(Credit-Canva)
One of the most important and profound moments of a mother’s life is when they are nurturing and protecting the baby in their womb. The reason why they are advised precautions is because both their health, the baby’s and the mother’s, could be at risk for small mistakes. This fear may seem extreme but is not unfound especially as a new study has shown how the daily usage of plastic around them may cause their baby harm. That’s why days that bring the focus on baby and the mother's health are important.
7th of April every year is observed has World Health Day, according to World Health Organization (WHO), it helps draw attention to specific health concerns and this year’s focal point is “Healthy Beginning, Hopeful Futures” where they are highlighting women’s and baby health. According to WHO many women lose their lives during childbirth and many children lose their lives in the first year, and these are preventable death. So, it is very important to pay attention to your surroundings to make sure everyone is thriving.
Plastic products have become a huge part of our lives. According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Issues Brief 2024 edition, we generate over 460 million metric tons of plastic and 20 million metric tons every year. This not only affects the environment, but also for people’s direct health as we use plastic products every day. Many studies and health sources show us how the daily products we use are responsible for microplastics to invade our bodies and cause health issues. According to the United Nations Development Programme microplastics in our bodies could cause issues like endocrine disruption, weight gain and insulin resistance.
A new study published in the Nature Communications journal shows that even babies are not safe from the health effects of plastic. This study revealed a potential link between kids being affected by a common chemical found in plastic in their mother's womb, which may be negatively affecting their brain development.
The reason why this is a concerning link is because these chemicals are commonly found in everyday use plastics called phthalates. They have been linked to lower levels of important brain chemicals in newborns. Specifically, the research team observed reduced amounts of serotonin and dopamine in these infants. The study showed that these babies had lower amounts of serotonin and dopamine. These are like messengers in the brain that help with mood, learning, and how a baby reacts to things. This makes scientists worry that these "everywhere chemicals" could be bad for how a baby's brain grows.
To figure this out, the scientists followed 216 moms and their babies in a city called Atlanta. While the moms were pregnant, the scientists checked their urine samples to see how much of the phthalate chemicals was there. After the babies were born, they took a little bit of their blood to check different things. They found that the babies whose moms had more of these chemicals in their urine sample also had lower levels of specific amino acids in their blood.
These amino acids, called tyrosine and tryptophan, are used by the body to make the good brain stuff like serotonin and dopamine. These babies didn't do as well on tests that checked how well they paid attention and how quickly they reacted to things. This careful way of checking both moms and babies help show that the chemicals might be linked to these brain differences.
This study adds to other information that says these phthalate chemicals might cause other health problems too, like asthma and being overweight. It shows that these common chemicals might not just affect our bodies in general, but could also mess with how babies' brains grow, which is a very important time.
The researchers and other experts suggest some easy things we can do to be around less of these chemicals. One idea is to use glass or metal things instead of plastic for food and drinks. Another is to not use pans that have a nonstick coating. When you buy things like shampoo and soap, try to find ones that say "phthalate-free." As these chemicals can get into dust in our houses, it can help to open windows to get fresh air and to clean regularly with a damp cloth. Doing these simple things might help lower how much of these chemicals get into our bodies and could be especially important for protecting pregnant women and their babies.
Credits: Canva
When your child gets sick, the instinct to reach for antibiotics can be almost automatic. After all, we've been told for decades that these powerful medicines are the key to conquering infection. But what if that "quick fix" is silently reshaping your child's health in ways you never suspected? From tummy aches to chronic allergies and even developmental issues, new science is sounding an alarm about what repeated antibiotic therapy may be doing to little bodies. Before you agree to that next prescription, let's dig deeper into what's really happening in your child's system — and how to safeguard their health for the long term.
Antibiotics have revolutionized modern medicine with fatal infections such as pneumonia, strep throat, and bacterial meningitis are now curable, and thousands of lives have been saved through proper use of the medications. But when children—particularly those younger than two years old—are concerned, new studies are cautioning parents and doctors to be careful.
A recent study in the Journal of Infectious Diseases reviewed the medical histories of more than one million infants in the United Kingdom. The results showed a troubling correlation: frequent and early use of antibiotics in childhood might have lasting effects on a child's health. From disrupting gut microbiomes to making a child more susceptible to chronic diseases like asthma and allergies, overuse of antibiotics might be subtly changing pediatric health outcomes globally.
One of the deepest effects that antibiotics have on a child's body is by disrupting the gut microbiome. These drugs, though meant to target bad bacteria, sometimes fail to discriminate—destroying good bacteria within the gut in addition to the bad. And that's where problems start.
The gut contains trillions of microbes that contribute to digestion, immunity, and even mental health. If this system is disrupted at an early age, it may pave the way for inflammatory and allergic reactions in the future. The Rutgers Health study found that children who received multiple rounds of antibiotics before they were two were much more likely to develop asthma, food allergies, and hay fever. Risk increased with every course of antibiotics given.
The same research suggested an even more shocking possibility: a possible connection between early antibiotic exposure and intellectual disabilities. While this correlation needs more study for verification, it highlights a developing concern among pediatricians and researchers that the knock-on effects of antibiotic use may extend far beyond the gut.
Interestingly, the research did not identify a uniform association between antibiotic exposure and other conditions like ADHD, autism spectrum disorder, or autoimmune diseases like celiac disease and juvenile idiopathic arthritis. This difference highlights the complexity of how antibiotics affect the developing body, and it is implied that some systems are more susceptible to their impact than others.
In addition to the single child, a very real concern is growing antibiotic resistance. Antibiotic overuse and misuse—e.g., treating viral infections such as colds or flu with them—lead directly to drug-resistant bacteria. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), more than 35,000 people in the U.S. alone die every year from antibiotic-resistant infections.
What is particularly distressing about this for children is that they will frequently be put on antibiotics for viral infections for which antibiotics will not help. For instance, most upper respiratory infections, the common cold, and certain ear infections are viral and do not respond to antibiotic treatment. Yet, according to studies, half of all antibiotics prescribed to children are for precisely these conditions.
In a bid to eliminate genetic or environmental confounders, scientists even matched up siblings—one who was given antibiotics at an early age and one who wasn't. The outcomes were the same: children who had been exposed to more antibiotics were at greater risk for allergic and respiratory disease, family background aside. That's another indication that antibiotics themselves—rather than genetic factors or family practices—are likely the prime mover.
First, know that antibiotics are strong allies but not magical fixes. Antibiotics only work against bacterial illnesses—not viruses. Colds, flu, and most coughs won't benefit from antibiotics and could actually hurt a child's overall health if these medicines are abused.
If your child receives a prescription of antibiotics:
Doctors everywhere are promoting what's called "antibiotic stewardship"—the responsible use of antibiotics. Hospitals, clinics, and public health organizations are developing new standards to guarantee antibiotics are only used when absolutely necessary. But parents have a role to play, too. By asking the question of whether each antibiotic is really needed, following proper hygiene, and keeping up with vaccinations, families can stem the danger of resistance and safeguard their child's future health.
Antibiotics are a part of modern medicine, but not without danger—particularly in growing bodies. As important as they should never be avoided when medically indicated, parents and pediatricians need to balance their use, particularly in children younger than two years old. As scientists learn more about the ways these medications affect long-term health, one thing is certain, less is more for antibiotics early in life.
Credits: Canva
A new research from the University of Southern California (USC) has made a crucial new discovery regarding Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), highlighting the vital, yet often unexamined, connection between gut health and brain activity. The research, published in Nature Communications, highlights how children with autism may be experiencing metabolic disorders due to gut imbalance, which in turn affect the manufacture of neurotransmitters, and as a result, have an impact on behavior linked to the condition.
By current estimates around the world—1% of the world's population suffers from ASD, emerging findings such as these provide promise for more specific and effective treatments.
The idea that brain and gut constantly communicate with one another is no longer speculative; it's an essential biological truth. The gut-brain axis, a highly evolved, two-way communication network, involves neural, hormonal, and immunological signaling pathways. Interestingly, the gut possesses its own nervous system, the enteric nervous system, and it contains more neurons than the spinal cord.
We demonstrated how gut metabolites affect the brain, and also how the brain affects behavior," says Professor Lisa Aziz-Zadeh, lead author on the USC study and researcher for USC's Brain and Creativity Institute. "Essentially, the brain is the middleman between autism behavior and gut health.".
About 90% of the neural communications between gut and brain go in the direction from gut to brain, and not the other way around, suggesting that gut health may have a more predominant role in dictating emotions and behavior than is currently accepted.
The USC study recruited 84 children aged 8 to 17—43 with autism and 41 neurotypical controls. Researchers collected behavioral information, conducted brain scans, and analyzed stool samples to examine gut metabolites. Of note was the "tryptophan pathway," which degrades the amino acid tryptophan to synthesize serotonin and other neuroactive compounds.
Since serotonin is needed for emotional regulation, socialization, and learning—and 90% of it is produced in the gut—results point to the huge impact that gut health can have on brain function. Abnormality in serotonin production through the imbalance of gut microbes has a direct link with normal ASD symptoms, including social challenges and repetitive behavior.
Children with ASD also frequently present with gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms—constipation, diarrhea, bloating, and gastroesophageal reflux—frequently more than their neurotypical peers. They are not mere comorbidities, but could very likely be part of the pathology of ASD.
"The gut-brain axis may offer a way to explain the overlap of GI and behavioral symptoms," adds Sofronia Ringold, a USC doctoral student and study coauthor. "If we can reach the gut, we may also be able to influence behavior and thought."
This is where the tryptophan pathway plays a crucial role. Gut bacteria determine the metabolism of tryptophan, and as a result, serotonin production is influenced, and brain activity linked to autism-related behavior may be altered.
ASD has also been shown to result from a combination of epigenetic, genetic, and environmental factors. It has been linked with immune dysregulation, raised inflammatory cytokine levels, and complications during birth. However, the gut is increasingly being identified as a potentially modifiable factor in this intricate web.
Children with ASD typically possess higher levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and TNF-α, which may be responsible for breaking gut permeability and perpetuating a cycle of gut and brain inflammation.
Further, gut microbial dysbiosis—a distortion of the gut microbiome—has been shown to reduce microbial diversity and compromise intestinal barrier integrity. This can promote "leaky gut" conditions that allow toxic chemicals to enter the bloodstream and become transported to the brain, where they may trigger or exacerbate symptoms of ASD.
While current treatments for ASD are largely behavioral interventions and, in some cases, medication, the study sets the stage for non-invasive treatments. These include microbiota-targeted treatments such as probiotics, diet, and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT).
Probiotics, for instance, have already shown promise in improving neurotransmitter production and cognitive function. But more stringent, extended trials need to be conducted to ascertain their safety and efficacy as a treatment for the symptoms of ASD.
One of the biggest challenges remains in addressing ARFID (Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder), which affects children with autism. This feeding style reduces food diversity and also complicates the restoration of microbial balance with diet alone.
The USC research adds to a growing global effort to understand ASD from a more holistic view. As the number of autism diagnoses continues to grow, especially in developing countries where awareness and resources are still emerging, this research can inform future recommendations for treating the condition more holistically—starting not just with the brain but the gut.
Credits: Canva
A recent British Medical Journal (BMJ) study challenges the widely discussed idea of banning smartphones and social media among children. While such bands are often introduced with the intention of protecting or safeguarding the young minds, researchers have found this approach is unrealistic and also is ineffective in the longer run.
The BMJ study rightly points out that an outright ban on smartphones and social media would do little to nothing to prepare children for the digital world that they would inevitably be growing up in. While there are some countries that support bans to protect children from the potential harm, the experts of this study stress that there is little to no evidence showing such bans will actually improve children's well-being.
The evaluation of school smartphone policies in England revealed that limiting smartphone during school hours did not lead to any benefits. there was no improvement in student's mental health, physical activity levels, sleep, academic performance, or even in classroom behaviors. Moreover, the restrictions did not lead to reduced overall phone use or a drop in problematic social media habits outside the school.
Is there really a right approach to this? Well, experts suggest that instead of imposing bans, one must advocate for rights-based strategy. This is also rooted in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. This approach emphasizes the need to educate children about technology and guide their unsafe to help them understand the responsibility as digital citizens.
According to the study, this means designing digital experiences that are age-appropriate and creating policies that prioritize both protection and participation. Children should be taught how to use technology in a healthy way rather than be kept away from it altogether.
Digital literacy is important as technology is a permanent fixture in today's world. If you try to remove it entirely from a child's life, it would be practical. It could also leave them unequipped to navigate the digital world later on. The authors of the study also argue that while it is important to create tech-free spaces and moments, blanket restrictions are just temporary fixes. They do not help in fostering meaningful, long-term habits that support children's development.
Instead, the goal should be to ensure that children can use digital tools responsibly across various environments—be it school, home, or public spaces—while also protecting their mental and emotional well-being.
The best approach for this is to build a safe digital ecosystem. For this rights-based approach to work, the study also suggests that immediate efforts must be made. They must be directed toward improving legislation that holds tech companies accountable for child-friendly digital design.
There is also a need for professional training and guidance for parents, teachers, and schools so they can also support children in building healthy tech habits. While the challenges in the changing current systems and mindsets are being acknowledged, the authors of the study pointed out that this strategy is more sustainable and effective in the longer run.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited