Should Teenagers Drink Coffee? New Guidelines Clears The Air

Updated Feb 2, 2025 | 10:00 PM IST

SummaryCoffee is one of the most popular drinks in the current times, with people dedicating their time and often their schedules around the time they have their coffee. Naturally, this coffee obsession is bound to rub off on kids, but is it good for them? Here is what FDA says about it.
Credit-Canva

Credit-Canva

Coffee has always been a crowd favorite drink among all age groups. But we all know that caffeine has a different effect on everyone. Doctors often express how young kids and teens should be careful about caffeine but new guidelines regarding this set a firm boundary when it comes to teen health and caffeine. Health experts, working with the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, have new advice on healthy drinks for kids and teens in the age group of 5-18. The guidelines say that water and milk are the best drinks for them. They want kids to get into good drinking habits early so they can stay healthy. They're also worried about kids drinking too many sugary and caffeinated drinks. This new guide helps parents know what's good for their kids to drink.

How Did Caffeine Become So Popular Among Teens?

The new guidelines are especially relevant because caffeinated drinks have become increasingly popular among teenagers. Coffee shops, like Starbucks, are popular hangouts for teens, and energy drinks, often packed with caffeine and promoted by social media influencers, are widely available. And a very popular theme on social media is coffee, people enjoy having different varieties of it, making to a very affordable and trendy thing to enjoy! There are accounts dedicated to coffee consumption and often kids and teens partake in these trends.

A recent poll by the C.S. Mott Children's Hospital found that nearly a quarter of parents say their teens consume caffeine almost every day. The most common sources are sodas, followed by coffee and tea, and then energy drinks. Even chocolate contributes to caffeine intake. The amount of kids who consume coffee raises concerns about the potential health effects of caffeine on young people, whose bodies and brains are still developing. The easy access to these beverages and the marketing strategies targeting young audiences contribute to the problem.

Could The Lack Of Guidelines Be A Reason?

Right now, there aren't any official rules about how much caffeine kids can have. This makes it hard for parents and doctors to know what to tell kids about caffeine. The new report tries to fix this by giving some advice based on research. Experts are worried about how caffeine affects kids' sleep, mood, and health. Kids are more sensitive to caffeine than adults. Caffeine can keep them awake, make them anxious, and might even affect their hearts. Because there aren't any rules, it's important to have experts telling us what's safe.

How Caffeine Affects Kids

Caffeine is something that makes your body speed up. Adults can usually handle some caffeine, but it's different for kids and teens. Their bodies are smaller, and their brains are still growing, so caffeine can affect them more. It can make it hard for them to sleep, make them nervous, and even give them headaches or stomachaches. It can also raise their blood pressure and heart rate. Caffeine can also change their mood, making them cranky or unable to focus. We don't know all the ways caffeine affects kids in the long run, and that's another reason to be careful.

The report says that plain water and plain milk are the healthiest drinks for kids and teens. They say it's okay to have a little bit of 100% juice, plant-based milk, or flavored milk, but not too much. They also say kids should stay away from sugary drinks like soda, sports drinks, and lemonade. And, very importantly, they shouldn't drink caffeinated drinks or other things that give you a jolt. This advice is based on what we know about how these drinks affect kids' health. Sugary drinks can cause weight gain and other problems, and caffeine can mess with sleep and other things.

End of Article

After Lindsay Clancy Trial, Massachusetts Pushes Stronger Postpartum Mental Health Screening

Updated Sep 16, 2026 | 08:10 AM IST

SummaryMassachusetts Governor Maura Healey recently proposed to expand postpartum mental health screening, treatment and care for pregnant and new mothers.
After Lindsay Clancy Trial, Massachusetts Pushes Stronger Postpartum Mental Health Screening

Credit: X

Massachusetts is moving to strengthen postpartum mental-health care after the controversial trial of Lindsay Clancy increased focus on gaps in treating serious mental-health conditions during and after pregnancy.

Governor Maura Healey has proposed $2 million to expand voluntary nurse home visits to families with newborns, along with $250,000 to strengthen a state program that helps healthcare providers identify and treat mental-health and substance-abuse problems during pregnancy and after birth.

The state's Department of Public Health will also update regulations governing perinatal mental-health screening to identify a broader range of conditions, including mood and anxiety disorders and postpartum psychosis.

Massachusetts Expands Postpartum Mental Health Screening

The current Massachusetts law already requires postpartum depression or major depressive disorder screening for eligible postnatal individuals receiving care from primary-care providers, obstetricians, midwives and pediatricians.

But mental health problems after pregnancy can extend beyond depression.

The state's updated approach is expected to give healthcare providers more opportunities to ask about a patient's mental health during and after pregnancy, including during visits with an obstetrician, primary-care doctor or pediatrician.

Healey said, “Becoming a mother is a profound life change, and every parent deserves support — not just during pregnancy, but in the months that follow.”

She added, “Postpartum depression, anxiety and other maternal mental health conditions are real medical conditions, and no mother should feel ashamed to ask for help or feel like she has to navigate this journey alone.”

The changes are particularly relevant because there is currently no validated screening tool specifically for postpartum psychosis. Massachusetts health guidance says diagnosis depends on a healthcare provider assessing the person's symptoms.

Also read: The Postpartum Nutrition Gap: Why New Mothers Often Neglect Their Own Health After Delivery

More About The New Programme

The proposed $2 million investment would expand the state's Welcome Family programme so that all families with newborns can be offered a voluntary nurse home visit.

Massachusetts has around 68,000 births a year, while the programme currently reaches about 3,000 families annually. During a visit, a nurse can assess the health of the mother and baby, answer questions about feeding and sleep, and connect families with additional support.

The state also plans to invest $250,000 in the Massachusetts Child Psychiatry Access Program for Moms, which supports healthcare providers treating maternal mental health and substance-use conditions.

The additional funding could also help track postpartum psychosis data and improve education for healthcare professionals, mothers and families about warning signs.

Also read: Paris Jackson Undergoes ‘Painful’ ECT for Depression: Can Electroconvulsive Therapy Reduce Suicide Risk?

Early Detection Is Key

Perinatal mental-health conditions can affect people during pregnancy and after childbirth. Depression and anxiety are more common, while postpartum psychosis is rare but requires urgent medical attention.

Massachusetts' move aims to ensure that mental-health concerns are not identified only during a dedicated postpartum visit, but also when new parents interact with other parts of the healthcare system.

The measures follow the trial of Lindsay Clancy, whose attorneys argued that she experienced postpartum psychosis when she killed her three children in 2023. Prosecutors disputed the defence's argument, and the jury ultimately failed to reach a unanimous verdict, resulting in a mistrial.

Healey said the bigger goal is to make conversations about maternal mental health more routine. She said, “To every mom who has struggled with her mental health before, during or after pregnancy, I want you to know we see you — I see you.”

End of Article

22-Year-Old Frozen Embryo Produced A Healthy Baby: Does An Embryo Have An Expiry Date?

Updated Sep 13, 2026 | 08:00 PM IST

SummaryIn Athens, a 54-year-old woman recently became a mother to a healthy baby girl from a old frozen embryo that had been in cryopreservation for over two decades.
22-Year-Old Frozen Embryo Produced A Healthy Baby: Does An Embryo Have An Expiry Date?

Credit: AI

A 54-year-old woman in Greece recently gave birth to a healthy baby girl using an embryo that had been frozen for more than two decades. The case has marked a milestone in IVF, raising an intriguiging question: does a frozen embryo eventually have an expiry date?

Cristina Rapti-Tzelepi and her husband, Constantinos Raptis, welcomed their daughter Georgia in Athens on September 9.

The embryo was originally cryopreserved in March 2004 and was transferred in December 2025. The baby weighed 3.49 kg at birth.

The couple decided to use one of their remaining embryos after their 21-year-old son, Giorgos, died in a road accident in October 2025. Their son had also been born following IVF using an embryo from the same original treatment.

The case is remarkable as the embryo remained frozen for more than two decades. But scientifically, that does not mean the embryo continued ageing for 22 years.

Does A Frozen Embryo Actually Age?

A frozen embryo does not age in the way a an actual human person does. During cryopreservation, embryos are stored at extremely low temperatures, generally around -196°C in liquid nitrogen. At this temperature, biological processes that drive cellular ageing effectively stop.

The key is maintaining stable cryostorage conditions. The American Society for Reproductive Medicine says cryopreserved embryos must be maintained under stringent conditions, with IVF laboratories monitoring liquid-nitrogen levels and storage systems.

So, an embryo frozen in 2004 does not biologically become a 22-year-old embryo. Its chronological storage time increases, but its cells are preserved in the state they were in when frozen.

Also read: Emma Barnett Reveals She Had A Hysterectomy After Endometriosis Battle: What To Know About Adenomyosis

Long Storage Of Embryo & Healthy Pregnancy

A recent systematic review and meta-analysis published in Human Reproduction Open examined 23 studies involving more than 250,000 embryo-transfer cycles.

Researchers found that embryos stored for longer than five years appeared slightly less likely to survive thawing, with some reductions in pregnancy and live-birth rates.

However, the outcomes stopped worsening after around two years of storage, with no further deterioration as storage continued for much longer periods.

Longer storage was also not associated with increased risks of premature birth, high birth weight, or birth defects.

Earlier research has similarly found no dose-response relationship between the duration of embryo cryostorage and pregnancy outcomes.

Also read: Explained: What Is Posthumous Reproduction?

Does An Embryo Have An Expiry Date?

Scientifically, there is no established biological expiry date for a properly cryopreserved embryo. The bigger concerns are the quality of the embryo before freezing, the freezing and thawing technique, laboratory conditions, and whether the embryo survives thawing.

There are also factors like biological limits and legal limits that affect IVF. In Greece, women currently have a legal age limit of 54 for completing IVF procedures.

Rapti-Tzelepi had only a limited window in which to obtain approval and undergo treatment. Her case is therefore not proof that every embryo can remain viable indefinitely. But it provides another striking example of how modern cryopreservation can preserve reproductive potential for decades.

End of Article

Beyond Vaccines And Nutrition: Why Childhood Cancer Needs A Wider Conversation

Updated Sep 11, 2026 | 02:41 PM IST

SummaryFever, tiredness, headaches, loss of appetite or body pain are frequent childhood complaints. But when they persist, keep returning or occur alongside other changes, they should not simply be treated repeatedly without evaluation.
Beyond Vaccines And Nutrition: Why Childhood Cancer Needs A Wider Conversation

Credit: iStock

Nearly 76,805 children and adolescents in India are estimated to develop cancer each year. At the same time, childhood cancer can be highly treatable when diagnosed early and managed appropriately, with survival exceeding 80% in settings where timely diagnosis and comprehensive treatment are available.

When people think about preventive healthcare for children, the conversation usually centers on vaccinations, good nutrition, physical activity, sleep and regular health check-ups. These are important for a child’s overall health. But prevention also involves something that is often overlooked: recognizing when a child’s health is changing and seeking medical advice at the right time.

Childhood cancer is different from many cancers seen in adults. In most cases, there is no clear lifestyle-related cause that parents could have avoided. A child developing cancer is therefore not usually linked to something the parents did or did not do. This is important because there is no particular diet, exercise routine or supplement that can guarantee protection against childhood cancer.

The Importance of Recognizing a Pattern

For doctors, one of the more practical ways to improve outcomes is to recognize when a seemingly common symptom is not following its usual course. Fever, tiredness, headaches, loss of appetite or body pain are frequent childhood complaints. But when they persist, keep returning or occur alongside other changes, they should not simply be treated repeatedly without evaluation.

• Unexplained weight loss

• Unusual bruising or bleeding

• Persistent bone or abdominal pain

• A growing lump or swelling

• Repeated headaches

• Changes in vision

These are some signs that may require further assessment. These symptoms are not specific to cancer, but their persistence warrants attention.

Why Early Diagnosis Matters

Most childhood cancers do not have a routine screening test for healthy children. Diagnosis therefore often depends on noticing an unusual pattern and investigating it appropriately.

A delay does not necessarily mean that cancer has been missed, but prolonged delays can allow some cancers to progress before treatment begins. For this reason, awareness among parents and healthcare providers, timely evaluation and appropriate referral are important parts of childhood cancer care.

Prevention Is Not Just About Avoiding Cancer

Vaccination still has a place in the broader cancer-prevention conversation. Hepatitis B vaccination helps reduce the risk of liver cancer linked to chronic hepatitis B infection, while HPV vaccination can help prevent HPV-related cancers later in life. However, these vaccines do not prevent most cancers that occur during childhood.

Similarly, nutrition should be viewed in the right context. A balanced diet supports growth and recovery, including during cancer treatment, but there is no specific food or diet that can prevent a cancer.

The Cost of Childhood Cancer

Childhood cancer can place a significant financial and practical burden on families. Treatment costs may be accompanied by expenses related to travel, accommodation, food and time away from work.

At the same time, families today have more avenues of support than before. Government health schemes, public healthcare facilities and non-government organizations can help with treatment costs and other practical needs. The challenge is ensuring that families are aware of these resources and can access them early enough.

Looking Beyond Treatment

Children who survive cancer may need long-term monitoring for possible effects of treatment on growth, development and other aspects of health.

For childhood cancer, therefore, prevention is less about finding a way to eliminate risk and more about reducing what can be changed: delayed diagnosis, interruptions in treatment and avoidable long-term complications..

(Dr Amita Mahajan, Senior Consultant, Pediatric Oncology, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, Delhi)

End of Article