By now, we all must be aware of how a mother's body changes during and even after pregnancy. What comes next is a challenging phase, called postpartum. However, it is not just the mothers, but dads too go through postpartum depression. As per the UT Southwestern Medical Center, 1 in 10 dads struggle with postpartum depression (PPD) and anxiety. According to a 2019 study published in Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience, a peer reviewed journal providing evidence-based information, titled Postpartum Depression in Men by Jonathan R Scarff defines postpartum depression as an episode of major depressive disorder occurring soon after the birth of a child. While it is frequently reported in mothers, but can also occur in father. However, there is no established criteria for this in men, although it could present over the course of a year, with symptoms of irritability restrict emotions, and depression.

Why Do Dads Experience PPD?

Fathers can also experience postpartum depression (PPD) due to various factors, including a history of depression, relationship conflicts, financial stress, and maternal depression. Sleep deprivation and disrupted circadian rhythms, known to affect maternal mental health, may also contribute to PPD in men. Additionally, hormonal changes during and after pregnancy play a role. Studies suggest that lower testosterone levels in new fathers reduce aggression and enhance responsiveness to a baby’s cries, while increased estrogen levels promote more engaged parenting. However, these hormonal shifts can also increase vulnerability to depression. Low testosterone is directly linked to depressive symptoms, and imbalances in estrogen, prolactin, vasopressin, and cortisol may hinder father-infant bonding, further exacerbating PPD symptoms.

In fact the study also goes on to note that fathers can experience prenatal depression like mothers too. While it depends on the kind of environment they are in, here are some of the common reasons why dads feel this way:

Hormonal Changes: As per a 2014 study published in the American Journal of Human Biology, titled Prenatal hormones in first-time expectant parents: Longitudinal changes and within-couple correlations, showed that fathers experience hormonal changes during and after their partner's pregnancy. The main reason is the decline in testosterone.

Feeling Disconnected: While dads also want to be part of the newborn experience, the baby usually spends most of the time with the mother. It may make them feel like they are on the "outside".

Other reasons include the pressure that a father feels. Parenting is not easy, it adds on to financial pressure, and this thought could also lead to depression. Especially, if depression runs in father's family, he is more likely to feel depressed with these changes around him. Most new parents underestimate the role lack of sleep plays in their lives. Staying up all night trying to get your baby to eat or sleep can leave you feeling sleep deprived, which could be one of the reasons why the father too may feel tired and depressed.

What Can Be Done?

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommended that postpartum depression screenings not be solely the responsibility of obstetrician, and it must be done by pediatricians too to incorporate maternal health. However, fathers too should go for such screenings. In fact, in 2020, an editorial in the Journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics called on pediatricians to assess the mental health of all new parents regardless of gender.

The ray of hope here is that more and more people are talking about it and are able to recognize the depression dads also go through. The change is not just for moms, but also for dads, thus it is important that they also are taken care of.

Nowadays, it is very common to see kids as young as 1st or 2nd graders having phones. While having phones on their person helps parents keep a closer eye on them, but is this much exposure to electronic devices, ok?

A survey reveals that many parents feel pushed to buy smartphones for their kids, even when they have doubts. Researchers studied 500 parents with children aged 8 to 13 found that almost half felt pressured into buying a phone. Another 44% worried their child would feel "left out" without one, showing how big this decision is for families.

Worries and Few Rules

Even though most parents (74%) had concerns at first, a quarter gave their child a smartphone without talking about if they were ready emotionally. The study also showed that a small number of parents (13%) put very few or no limits on phone use. Most of these parents felt their kids would just find ways around any rules anyway.

This study was requested by Motorola to highlight helpful online tools and advice from a UK children's charity. It aims to show the tough choices parents face when getting their child's first phone.

Is There a "Right" Age?

An expert noted that there's no "right" age to give a child their first phone. It really depends on each child and what that family needs. They stressed that parents should think about why their child needs a phone. If it's just for calls and texts, a simpler phone might be better than a smartphone. The expert also highlighted how important it is for parents and kids to talk openly about staying safe online.

Another survey, which included 500 children aged 8 to 13, found that 44% of kids were going online or using apps without their parents knowing. What's more concerning, during this unsupervised time, 31% saw things they felt were not appropriate for their age.

Why Smartphones Are Still Popular

Even with these concerns, most parents are still choosing smartphones over simpler devices for their kids. The main reasons are safety features and GPS tracking, with over half of parents (56%) seeing these as key benefits. A representative from the phone company said, "It's important to ensure children are equipped with the right guidance and boundaries when it comes to smartphone use and internet access." The company is actively working with charities to give parents the tools and information to make smart choices about their children's smartphone use.

Do Smartphones Affects Children’s Health

A 2022 study done by European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, states that more and more kids and teens are using cell phones and other wireless gadgets. The study found some evidence suggesting that a lot of general phone and device use might be linked to more outward behavior problems like being hyper or aggressive in younger kids and teens. However, the results were less clear for inward problems like anxiety or depression.

Another 2023 study published in the Journal of Therapies & Rehabilitation Sciences, detailed the physical as well as mental aspects of smartphone usage in kids.

Physical Health

Spending too much time looking down at smartphones is really impacting kids' bodies. This often leads to poor posture, where their necks are bent forward for long periods, causing stiffness and pain. It can also limit how much they can move their neck and put extra strain on their spine. Plus, this constant bent-neck position can even affect their breathing, making their lungs work less well and weakening the muscles they use to breathe. These problems are also connected to kids being less fit and sometimes gaining too much weight.

Mental Health and Well-being

Beyond just physical issues, using smartphones too much can also hurt kids' minds and feelings. It can make real-life friendships weaker, leading to kids feeling more lonely and shy around others. Emotionally, a lot of screen time might make them act immature, have unstable moods, struggle to pay attention, and have less self-control. Another big problem is that using phones a lot is linked to more sleep problems, meaning kids aren't getting the rest they need to be healthy and happy.

If a 3-year-old winces every time she bites an apple, parents think she is a picky eater but what happens months later, she develops a severe tooth decay that spreads to several teeth—an experience that can be avoided if she undergoes a simple dental check-up at an earlier time. This may all ring familiar and true to many parents and across the globe, thousands of kids quietly endure avoidable oral health problems, all because of delayed visits to the dentist. And although the symptoms may initially appear insignificant, the long-term effects of ignoring early dental care are immense—affecting all the way from sleep to speech to self-esteem.

Routine dental visits and early treatment are the foundation of proper oral health during childhood. Pediatric dentists emphasize that instilling healthy habits of oral hygiene at an early age not only wards off tooth decay and gum disease but also aids in the detection and treatment of conditions such as crooked teeth or irregular growth patterns. These initial treatments encourage proper dental growth and lay the foundation for a lifetime of healthy, confident smiles.

"Oral health is directly related to overall health, development, and growth," maintains Dr. Manasi Shimpi, an expert pediatric and preventive dentist. She wholeheartedly recommends that the first dental visit occur by a child's first birthday or whenever their first tooth erupts. "We are observing more cavities in toddlers than ever before," she cautions. The main culprits? Snacking throughout the day, high levels of processed and sugar intake, and poor oral hygiene habits.

Contrary to popular belief, cavities don't necessarily hurt in the beginning. That quiet march towards destruction typically means by the time they're detected, the damage is widespread—often necessitating intricate procedures with general anesthesia. These not only become physically draining for young children but emotionally traumatic for families, not to mention the cost involved.

Perhaps the most direct danger of delayed dental treatment is the onset of pain and infection. Painful cavities or gum problems can be very distressing, can cause discomfort while eating, and can even contribute to other oral diseases. In extreme instances, children can be treated under general anesthesia—a process not only psychologically draining for the child but also stressful and expensive for families.

Dentist visits aren't all about cavities. The anatomy of a child's mouth can tell us a lot about their health, development, and growth. Missed appointments mean important indications such as tongue-ties, incorrect bite formation, and constricted jaws usually go unseen until they appear as major problems—anything from feeding issues to speech disorders.

But the effect is not just in the mouth. Dr. Shimpi stresses, "Oral health is closely related to general health, growth, and development. When we take care of kids' teeth early, we are taking care of their future." Creating a good rapport with the dentist at an early age can also reduce fear and anxiety, fostering a lifetime of oral care.

The tongue molds the jaw, and the top of the mouth serves as the floor of the nose," says Dr. Shimpi. "Abnormalities in the structure of the jaw can cut off nasal breathing and push kids into mouth-breathing—a habit that's associated with sleep disturbance, snoring, even behavioral issues.

Factors such as tongue-ties—when the tissue underneath the tongue inhibits movement—can disrupt breastfeeding, followed by speech problems and the formation of a weak jaw. Early examination gives way to interventions like oral myotherapy, habit correction, or small procedures that can salvage these issues before they become entrenched.

Can Missing Dentist Visit Predispose Your Child to Developmental Defects?

The relationship between children's oral health and their capacity to develop and flourish is more profound than most of us appreciate. Impaired dental development can result in speech difficulties, difficulty chewing healthy foods, and sleep disturbances—all contributing factors in learning, behavior, and emotional balance.

Neglected, these issues tend to necessitate expensive and elaborate treatments—orthodontic work, operations, or speech therapy—that might have been prevented with early dental examination.

Additionally, early visits encourage a good rapport with dental health providers, eliminating fear and apprehension that might arise if a child's initial visit is already connected to pain or discomfort. Establishing trust during these formative years ensures children are more inclined to have good oral hygiene and keep regular dental check-ups in their lives.

Misconceptions About Baby Teeth

One of the most popular myths among parents is that baby teeth do not matter because they will fall out anyway. This myth is not only false but can also be detrimental. Baby teeth, or primary teeth, are essential in several ways: they enable children to chew food effectively, assist in the formation of speech, and preserve space for the incoming permanent teeth. Neglecting their upkeep can lay the groundwork for lifelong dental and developmental issues.

Dr. Shimpi says, "Tiny teeth are a big deal. They help with chewing, speech, and jaw formation, and hold space for permanent teeth. Ignoring delay or irregularity in milk teeth can influence these functions later on."

Dental care abandoned in early childhood can have a ripple effect: excruciating infections, eating problems, sleep disturbances, impaired speech development, and behavioral problems due to pain and malnutrition.

Dr. Shimpi stresses that hygiene needs to start even prior to teeth coming in. Gently wiping the baby's gums with a clean gauze after meals can set the stage for good habits. When teeth arrive, a soft-bristled toothbrush and a rice-sized amount of fluoride toothpaste are a must. "It's not really about brushing—about creating consistency," she says.

Is Delayed Teething Normal Or A Red Flag?

Teething typically begins between 6 and 10 months of age, but a slight delay—especially if there is a family history—is usually not a cause for concern. However, if no teeth have erupted by 12-14 months, it’s wise to consult a pediatric dentist. Dr. Shimpi notes, “Sometimes, delayed teething is simply a variation of normal growth, but occasionally it can indicate underlying issues like nutritional deficiencies, endocrine disorders, or genetic conditions.”

What is most important is not so much when the teeth come in, but how. Are they swollen or colored? Is there undue drooling or irritability without eruption signs? Early dental visits aid in monitoring teething patterns within the overall scheme of growth and development, preventing concerns from arising.

Early dental visits enable teething patterns to be evaluated in relation to overall development, so nothing essential is overlooked during these formative years.

Role of Parents and Dentists

Brushing the teeth twice a day, consuming nutritious foods, avoiding excessive snacks between meals, and minimizing sugary foods are habits that form the basis of maintaining oral health. Forming these habits at an early age not only avoids dental issues but also makes the children responsible for their own health.

Dr. Shimpi puts it in perspective: "Parents should consider baby teeth not as temporary fashion accessories, but as introductory instruments for life-long oral wellness. What is visible in the mouth tends to mirror what is occurring within the body. Baby teeth care is the gateway to a healthy mouth and lifetime smile confidence."

Prevention Is Easier Than Cure

Prevention is always better than cure—particularly when it comes to children's teeth. Beginning with simple measures such as wiping gums after feeding, brushing teeth twice daily, limiting sugary snacks, and planning for frequent dental visits can be the key.

Dr. Shimpi sums it up: "Tiny teeth are building blocks. They're not merely temporary add-ons—they shape speech, nutrition, sleep, and even future confidence. Neglecting delays or issues can have lasting effects well into adulthood."

Prolonged delays in visiting the dentist could be considered inconsequential, but the effects are far-reaching. Preventing dental cavities is just the tip of the iceberg of what early dental visits are all about—supporting a child's development, growth, and overall health. The price of postponed dental care is not merely financial. It's paid in pain, anxiety, lost developmental signals, and long-term health consequences.

Dr. Manasi Shimpi, a leading Pediatric and Preventive Dentist at HNM Dental Centre, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi in India

In January 2025, the Danish government finally announced an end to the use of the controversial forældrekompetenceundersøgelse (FKU) — a psychometric assessment used to evaluate parental competency. After years of increasing pressure from Indigenous rights organizations, international human rights groups, and the Greenlandic government had finally paid off when the test was officially abandoned amid accusations of systemic discrimination, cultural bias, and child removals based on colonial-era assumptions.

The test, based on Western norms of psychology, became a focal point in the already complicated relationship between Denmark and its former colony, Greenland, triggering important questions regarding cultural bias, child protection, and Indigenous rights.

What Was the Danish Parenting Competency Test?

The FKU, or “parenting competency test,” was a psychometric assessment used by Danish child protection authorities to evaluate whether parents were fit to raise their children. In theory, the test aimed to protect children by identifying families in crisis or parents unable to provide adequate care. In practice, however, it became a tool of controversy—especially when applied to Greenlandic families.

The test assessed parents in a series of areas, such as their responses to imagined scenarios, self-concept, physical and mental well-being, outlook on life, and plans for the future. Most importantly, it was based on Western conception of good parenthood and delivered in Danish, with minimal attention to Greenlandic language, customs, or kinship systems. This incompatibility resulted in regular misinterpretations of the capacity of Greenlandic parents and sometimes led to children being taken from their parents.

Greenlandic children have traditionally been disproportionately represented in Denmark's child welfare system. Approximately 7% of Greenland-born children and 5% of children who have at least one Greenlandic parent are placed out-of-home. That's in sharp contrast to only 1% of the general Danish child population.

The application of FKU tests, the campaigners maintain, was a contributory factor in this lopsided number. Families were regularly tested with instruments that were not culturally sensitive, and sometimes in the absence of legal or psychological support. The test to protect was then perceived by many as a means of control — tearing children away from their cultural heritage and severing family bonds.

For some families, such as 38-year-old Keira Alexandra Kronvold's, the shift is too late. Required to undergo the FKU test twice — once when giving birth to her second child and again when pregnant with her third — she was finally found "unfit" by Danish officials. Her infant was removed from her care just hours after delivery, sparking public outrage and initiating mass protests in Copenhagen and Nuuk.

In 2022, the Danish Institute for Human Rights warned of the test's application among Indigenous families. In 2023, the UN Special Rapporteur on the rights of Indigenous Peoples issued an official condemnation of the FKU as deeply flawed and culturally insensitive. The Danish government, even with these warning signs, only "urged municipalities" to reconsider its application.

It wasn't until January 2025 that the government, at last, declared an outright suspension of the FKU test among Greenlandic families, citing "doubts" as to its cultural sensitivity — a half-hearted recognition of what activists had been decrying as a systemic failure.

Why Was the Test So Controversial?

Cultural Bias and Misjudgment

Greenlandic families and their supporters complained that the FKU did not consider the special cultural, linguistic, and social norms of Greenlandic Inuit society. The fact that the test is based on Danish language and Western notions of parenting resulted in Greenlandic traditional values—like communal childcare, nonverbal communication, and varying methods of discipline—frequently being misinterpreted or downgraded. Parents were even incorrectly evaluated as having cognitive impairments due to mere cultural differences in communication or problem-solving in certain instances.

Unfair Disproportionate Impact on Greenlandic Families

The effect of the FKU was drastic: 5–7% of Greenlandic-origin children in Denmark were removed from their families, as opposed to only 1% of Danish-origin children. High-profile cases, like that of Keira Alexandra Kronvold—whose infant was removed from her shortly after birth based in part on FKU findings—sparked countrywide protests in both Denmark and Greenland. For many, the incidents resonated with traumatic historical moments of forced assimilation and family disruption.

Human Rights and Legal Criticism

The FKU has been condemned by human rights groups, such as the Danish Institute for Human Rights and the UN Special Rapporteur on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, for its "serious cultural biases" and its call for the abolition of the FKU. Denmark is bound under international conventions like ILO Convention No. 169 to respect and protect the cultural identity of Indigenous peoples like the Greenlanders. The critics claimed that the FKU breached these commitments by refusing to modify its standards and approach in accordance with Greenlandic conditions.

The Danish Ministry of Social Affairs currently commits to making any subsequent parental reports culturally sensitive, using Greenlandic language and culture. The government asserts it will attempt to restore confidence and provide reparative structures, including placement in Greenlandic families whenever feasible.

Greenland's Children's Minister, Dr. Aqqaluaq B. Egede, described the decision as a "necessary but tardy measure" toward justice. "We cannot restore that which is lost, but we can ensure no additional harm is caused," he told a joint press conference in Nuuk.

How Does Removal From Families Impact Children?

The psychological effect of separating children from their parents is deep and lasting, as numerous studies over several decades have shown. When children are taken from their families—whether because of such highly criticized policies as Denmark's now-abandoned parenting test or other child protection measures—the effects tend to reach far beyond the initial disruption.

Attachment, the strong emotional connection that develops between a child and his or her main caregiver, is more than a whimsical notion but a vital building block for wholesome growth throughout life. Research that appeared in Current Directions in Psychological Science explains that attachment influences a child's sense of emotional security, social competence, and even stress- and adversity-coping ability in the years to come.

This attachment starts to develop even before a child is born. Myron Hofer, past director of the Sackler Institute for Developmental Psychology at Columbia University, cites that fetuses begin to develop preferred reactions to their mother's odors and sounds during pregnancy—preferences that carry on after birth. During the newborn phase, infants learn rapidly to recognize their mother's face and voice, providing the foundation of a secure attachment.

When attachment is suddenly severed, through early maternal separation, children go through a series of emotional and physiological responses. First, they go through a stage of anxious searching—calling out and searching for their attachment figure—and then they go through a stage of withdrawal and worsening responsiveness if reunification is not achieved.

Hofer's experiments with infant rats emphasized the biological basis of this trauma. He discovered that deprivation of maternal warmth, body contact, and sustenance induced distress in the young. Although artificial surrogates—warmth, tactile stimulation, and plentiful nutrition—were able to normalize a few features of their physiology, these could not substitute for the complex, higher-level behaviors in an actual mother–child relationship. Aspects of reciprocity, imitation, attunement, and play form a vital role in emotional and social development and cannot be imitated by institutional care or foster planning, regardless of good intentions.

For human children, the effects of forced separation can involve increased anxiety, attachment disorders, relationship difficulties, and even persistent mental health issues. The trauma associated with loss of family is sometimes doubled when cultural identity and language are lost as well, as was true for many Greenlandic children sent to Danish families under the FKU regime.