Image Credit: Canva
Cashews have long enjoyed a spot among the esteemed members of the nut family, gracing snack bowls, trail mixes, and gourmet recipes alike. With their creamy texture, delightful crunch, and rich nutritional profile, they’re a staple in many households and cuisines worldwide. But what if we told you that cashews, the humble kitchen favorite, aren’t actually nuts?
Much like peanuts, which are scientifically classified as legumes, cashews belong to a completely different botanical category. Surprising, right? This article delves deep into the botanical intricacies and culinary mysteries surrounding cashews, offering a clearer understanding of where this beloved ingredient truly belongs.
To unravel the mystery of cashews, it’s essential to first understand what defines a "true" nut. Botanically, a nut is a dry fruit encased within a hard shell, containing a single seed. The hard shell doesn’t split open when the fruit ripens, distinguishing nuts from other plant-based foods. Examples of true nuts include acorns, chestnuts, and hazelnuts. These are the quintessential representatives of the nut family.
In contrast, many foods colloquially referred to as nuts—like cashews, almonds, and pistachios—do not fit this scientific definition. So, if cashews aren’t nuts, what are they?
Cashews are classified as drupes. Drupes are fruits that have a fleshy exterior surrounding a single seed encased in a hard shell. The part we consume—the cashew “nut”—is the seed of this drupe.
The cashew tree, scientifically known as Anacardium occidentale, produces a fascinating fruit structure. The visible pear-shaped cashew apple, which often draws attention, is not the actual fruit. Beneath it hangs a small, kidney-shaped drupe. Inside this drupe lies the cashew seed, which is what we eat.
Interestingly, the cashew’s outer shell is inedible due to the presence of urushiol, a toxic compound also found in poison ivy. This makes the processing of cashews labor-intensive, as the shells must be carefully removed to ensure safety.
Given their culinary similarity to peanuts, you might wonder if cashews are legumes. However, legumes grow in pods containing multiple seeds that split open when mature. Examples include beans, peas, and peanuts.
Although cashews, like peanuts, can be split in half, their development within a drupe rather than a pod excludes them from the legume family. Cashews occupy a unique botanical category, making them difficult to classify strictly.
While cashews may not be nuts by botanical standards, they’re treated as nuts in the culinary world. Why? Because cashews share many characteristics with true nuts:
Nutritional Profile: Like nuts, cashews are rich in healthy fats, protein, and essential nutrients, making them a key ingredient in energy-boosting snacks and recipes.
Culinary Uses: Cashews are versatile and can be used in everything from nut butters and trail mixes to stir-fries and desserts, much like almonds or walnuts.
Interestingly, many popular “nuts” aren’t botanically nuts either. Walnuts, pecans, pistachios, and almonds are also drupe seeds. Even with their misclassification, cashews’ nutritional and culinary contributions have cemented their place in the nut aisle.
Regardless of classification, cashews are undeniably nutritious. They are packed with essential nutrients like magnesium, zinc, iron, and vitamins B6 and K. Their high content of monounsaturated fats supports heart health, while their protein and carbohydrate content make them a satisfying snack for sustained energy.
Cashews are also an excellent plant-based source of copper, which plays a vital role in energy production, brain health, and immune function. Adding them to your diet can offer numerous health benefits, whether sprinkled over salads, blended into creamy sauces, or enjoyed as a simple roasted snack.
Understanding the botanical classification of cashews not only satisfies curiosity but also highlights the incredible diversity of plant-based foods. It’s a reminder of the complexity of the natural world and the importance of accurate labeling in agriculture and nutrition.
Moreover, cashews’ unique classification showcases their versatility. Whether you consider them nuts, drupes, or seeds, there’s no denying their culinary and health value. Their rich flavor, satisfying texture, and nutrient-dense profile make them a standout ingredient across cuisines and diets.
So, are cashews nuts? Botanically, no. Cashews are drupe seeds, with a fascinating journey from tree to table. Yet, in the culinary world, they’ve earned a spot alongside true nuts, thanks to their similar flavor, texture, and nutritional attributes.
Regardless of their classification, cashews are a delicious, versatile, and nutritious food. Whether you’re enjoying a handful as a snack, blending them into a creamy vegan sauce, or incorporating them into a dessert, cashews deserve a place in your pantry and your diet.
Next time you reach for a bowl of “mixed nuts,” remember the botanical intricacies that make each ingredient unique- and give a little extra appreciation to the not-so-nutty cashew!
Credit: Canva
While the World Health Organization recommends 5g or a tablespoon of salt every day, Indians consume more than double, increasing their risk of having a fatal stroke exponentially.
According to EatRightIndia, Indians consume about 11g of salt each day through meals which can significantly increase their risk of high blood pressure, strokes and hypertension.
Hypertension causes over 1.6 million deaths annually, accounting for nearly 18 percent of all fatalities and heavily contributes to deaths caused by heart disease, stroke and kidney disease.
The most important side effect of consuming excessive salt intake is high blood pressure. Salt causes the body to retain water, increasing the volume of blood in your vessels and leading to elevated pressure levels. If your blood pressure consistently measures over 140/90 mmHg, it's time to evaluate your salt consumption.
Over time, this can rapidly raise your risk for heart disease, stroke while also potentially contributing to stomach cancer and weakened bones. Additionally, high blood pressure damages kidneys and excess sodium can lead to kidney stones or disease.
Apart from a 5gm recommendation for adults, NHS suggests that children between seven to 11 years of age should not eat more than 5g of salt while those between four to six years of age should eat less than 3g of salt every day to maintain heart health.
Both excessive and insufficient salt intake have been linked to adverse outcomes. Achieving the right balance is critical, and the best approach is to minimize processed food consumption rather than relying solely on the salt shaker.
Common items such as pickles, paapads, chutneys, salads and buttermilk significantly contribute to daily salt consumption. Hidden salts in packaged goods like biscuits, sauces, condiments and snacks also can increase your salt intake.
To cut down on your salt intake, experts recommend:
Credit: Canva
Tagatose, a natural sugar with a third of the calories of table sugar, may be the up-and-coming safe alternative to unhealthy added sugars, scientists say.
Researchers from Tufts University, Massachusetts in partnership with biotechnology companies Manus Bio (US) and Kcat Enzymatic (India), claim that tagatose, found in only small amounts in some dairy products and fruits, is a healthier option than regular sugar and sweeteners.
The experts also claim it this rare natural sugar also does not cause insulin spikes, making it safe for consumption for both Type 1 and 2 diabetes patients. Tagatose has also been previously recognized as safe for consumption by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the World Health Organization (WHO).
Certain studies have also found tagatose to be 'tooth friendly', as it can limit the growth of harmful microbes in the dental cavity and prevent tooth decay as well as cavities.
Due to being a natural sugar with similar taste and bulk to sugar but fewer calories, minimal blood sugar impact, prebiotic benefits and heat-stable for baking, tagatose is known to better than artificial sweeteners.
Moreover, it also lacks the bitter aftertaste common with some artificial sweeteners such as saccharin and stevia and tastes 92 percent as sweet and 60 percent less calories than common sugar.
With low calories and low absorption, tagatose is an attractive bulk sweetener, meaning it can not only can replace sugar for sweetness but can also provide a similar bulk texture in cooking that comes with adding the sugar in some quantity, something that high intensity sweetener substitutes are unable to do due to their composition.
Yes, tagatose can be eaten by insulin-resistant people as it's only partially absorbed in the small intestine; much of it being fermented by gut bacteria in the colon. Because of this, its impact on blood glucose and insulin is much less than that of conventional sugar.
Clinical studies show very low increases in plasma glucose or insulin after ingestion of tagatose. However, in the gut, the rare sugar is metabolized in a similar way to the fruit sugar, fructose, meaning those with fructose intolerances may want to steer clear
While tagatose is far more beneficials than other commercially-available sugars, it remains unavailable due to limited production. "There are established processes to produce tagatose, but they are inefficient and expensive," explains biological engineer Nik Nair from Tufts.
But it can still be found in milk and other dairy products when lactose is broken down by heat or enzymes, such as yogurt, cheese and kefir. Along with this, fruits such as apples, pineapples and oranges also contain trace levels of tagatose as part of their natural carbohydrate spectrum.
Credits: AP/Canva
President Donald Trump signed a bipartisan bill on January 14 that allows schools across the United States to serve whole milk and 2% milk again, rolling back Obama-era rules that restricted school cafeterias to low-fat or fat-free options. The decision was welcomed by dairy farmers, milk industry advocates, and lawmakers from both parties, many of whom attended the signing of the Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act at the Oval Office. The bill had passed unanimously in both chambers of Congress toward the end of 2025.
Trump’s move followed a major shift in federal nutrition messaging earlier this month. On January 7, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. unveiled updated dietary guidance that moves away from the traditional food pyramid and places greater emphasis on full-fat dairy, protein, and what he described as “healthy fats.” While announcing the changes, Kennedy said the government was “ending the war on saturated fats,” signalling a clear departure from decades of advice that encouraged lower-fat choices.
The Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act drew rare unanimous backing from lawmakers across party lines. President Donald Trump signed the legislation after sustained lobbying by dairy groups, farmers, and members of Congress who argued that schools needed more flexibility in what they serve children.
The law overturns restrictions introduced during the Obama administration, once again permitting whole and 2% milk in school meal programmes. The signing ceremony at the White House was attended by members of Congress, representatives from the dairy industry, and senior officials including Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins. Supporters described the measure as a practical step that supports children’s nutrition while also helping American farmers and giving parents more choice.
There is broad agreement that milk plays an important role in a child’s diet. Health bodies have long advised that children aged five to eight drink up to two and a half cups of milk daily, while those aged nine and older should aim for up to three cups. The disagreement has centred on whether full-fat or lower-fat versions are the better option.
Since 1990, federal dietary guidelines have recommended that children aged two and above consume skim or low-fat milk to reduce their intake of saturated fat. That position has been endorsed by organisations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Heart Association.
Megan Lott, a registered dietitian at Duke University and deputy director of Healthy Eating Research, an organisation involved in shaping guidance on beverages for school-aged children, has pointed out that low-fat and whole milk contain similar levels of key nutrients. These include protein, calcium, potassium, and vitamin D. The difference, she explained, is that lower-fat milk delivers those nutrients with fewer calories and less saturated fat.
Research has shown that high intake of saturated fat can raise cholesterol levels and, over time, increase the risk of heart disease. Extra calories can also contribute to weight gain in children, Lott said, according to The New York Times.
Experts say the healthiest milk choice depends largely on a child’s individual needs. For children over the age of two who are significantly overweight, calorie intake becomes more important. In such cases, nonfat or 1% milk may be a better option, said Dr. Abrams. For most children, however, he noted that any unsweetened, pasteurised milk is acceptable. He stressed that raw or unpasteurised milk should never be given to children because of the risk of serious food-borne infections.
Higher-fat milk may be beneficial for children who are underweight, Lott added. She recommended that parents speak to a paediatrician or dietitian to get advice tailored to their child’s health and growth needs, according to The New York Times.
Milk consumption among American children has fallen sharply over the past few decades. In its place, many children are drinking more fizzy drinks, sports drinks, and other sweetened beverages. That trend worries health experts because milk remains a key source of calcium, vitamin D, and protein. Dr. Abrams said that if bringing whole milk back into schools encourages children to drink more milk overall, it could have a positive effect on their health.
Lott, however, argued that the legislation missed an opportunity to make a bigger impact. She said removing flavoured milks from schools would have done more to improve children’s diets, as they add unnecessary sugar. That change, she noted, is backed by stronger evidence.
“There’s no reason they need chocolate milk or vanilla milk or any other flavours,” she said.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited