Vegan Diet (Credit: Canva)
Vegan diets are a plant-based nutrition programme, which involves eating solely plant-based foods such as vegetables, fruits, nuts, seeds and whole grains. Following this kind of diet means refraining from all types of animal products like eggs, dairy, meats etc. Advocates of this diet across the world argue that a well-balanced vegan diet not only protects people from chronic diseases such as cancer and heart disease but also saves animals from the pain and terror of slaughter and factory conditions. A vegan diet also contributes to the environment by significantly decreasing the emission of greenhouse gasses.
A 2023 study, published in the journal Nature, elucidated how different diet types influence an individual's microbiota composition. Research indicates that there is a significantly higher diversity of gut bacteria, like Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, capable of breaking down fibres found in vegan and vegetarian diets compared to the bacteria needed to metabolize the fats and proteins from animal-based diets. This suggests that plant-based diets promote a more varied and beneficial gut microbiome, which can enhance digestive health and nutrient absorption. The greater abundance of fiber-digesting bacteria may also contribute to improved overall health outcomes, as these microbes are linked to better metabolic functions and reduced inflammation.
(Photos: Canva)
Recent insights from medical experts show that even people who eat very less can gain weight due muscle mass, stress, and their body’s movement during the day.
Dr Mohit Bhandari, a robotic bariatric and endoscopic weight loss surgeon, founder and director of Mohak Bariatrics and Robotics at Bhandari Hospital Indore notes some people eat whatever they want without gaining weight, while others struggle even with dieting.
The secret lies in the complex interplay of genetics, metabolism, and environmental factors that influence weight management.
This is why are you are putting on weight, according to Dr Bhandari:
The speed at which the body burns calories is different for every individual. A slower metabolism means that even consuming small amount of food can lead to gain.
Individuals with high level of physical activity are less likely to be obese as they mean calories quicker.
Hormones like thyroid hormones, cortisol, and play a major role in weight regulation. Stress, lack of sleep and Insulin sensitivity are also factors that lead to fat storage in the body.
Consuming a snack rich in carbohydrate with 10-20 grams of protein before and immediately after strength training sessions further acts as a responsible factor in gaining weight.
Additionally, it can also trigger inflammation, which interferes with normal metabolism and insulin function, encouraging fat storage.
(Photos: Canva)
People are switching from weightlifting and training in the gym to real world strength training.
By strengthening multiple muscle groups at once, it enhances balance, posture, and overall physical efficiency. And one of the best ways to do this is by adopting the farmer's walk
Here’s Why Farmer’s Walk Has Gained Popularity:
Meanwhile, the legs including the quadriceps and hamstrings support the lower body’s endurance.
Overall, this exercise also regulates spinal and musculoskeletal health.
It can rebuild strength and stabilize mobility without exceeding tissue healing thresholds.
It can help build strength, improve balance, and boost endurance all at the same time by ensuing coordination among different muscles of the body, making it useful for physical therapy and everyday fitness.
5. Proper Diet and Care It is crucial to fuel your body and make it ready for such a comprehensive exercise.
Proteins such as legumes, tofu and supplements support muscle repair and growth making them an excellent source.
Hydration is the key factor that prevents fatigue and muscle cramps.
Before any extensive workout, warm up thoroughly with light cardio or stretching for about 15-20 minutes.
Credits: iStock
Ultra Processed Foods (UPF) should be treated more like cigarettes than foods. A new study by researchers at Harvard, the University of Michigan and Duke University noted that UPFs have more in common with cigarettes than with fruits and vegetables and thus require tighter regulation.
Their findings, published on February 3 in the healthcare journal Milbank Quarterly, suggest that both industries have historically engineered products to maximize consumption and potentially drive addiction-like behaviors.
According to the researchers, both cigarettes and ultra-processed foods are developed using similar strategies aimed at influencing reward pathways in the brain. The study suggests manufacturers carefully calibrate ingredients to optimize the “dose” of sugar, fat or salt, ensuring rapid sensory satisfaction that encourages repeated consumption.
The paper draws from addiction science, nutrition research and public health history to highlight these overlaps. The authors concluded that many UPFs demonstrate behavioral and consumption patterns that resemble addictive substances, even if they differ biologically from tobacco.
Professor Ashley Gearhardt, a clinical psychologist at the University of Michigan and one of the study’s authors, said she often hears patients describe their eating patterns in language similar to addiction. She explained that many individuals report intense cravings for products like soda and sugary snacks, acknowledging their health risks but finding it difficult to stop consuming them.
UPFs refer to food products that are heavily industrially manufactured using ingredients rarely found in home kitchens. These often include additives such as emulsifiers, artificial flavors, preservatives and coloring agents. Common examples include sugary soft drinks, packaged snacks, biscuits, instant meals and processed meats.
Unlike minimally processed foods such as fruits or vegetables, UPFs are typically designed for longer shelf life, convenience and enhanced taste appeal.
Read: Ultra-Processed Foods May Add 330 Extra Calories A Day, Study Finds
The researchers also examined marketing strategies used by food companies. They argue that claims such as “low fat” or “sugar free” may create a perception of health benefits while distracting from overall nutritional quality. The study compares this tactic to cigarette advertising in the 1950s, when filters were promoted as safety innovations despite offering limited protection.
The authors believe such marketing can delay regulatory action by creating confusion among consumers and policymakers.
While tobacco is not essential for survival, food is a basic human necessity, making regulation far more complex. However, Professor Gearhardt noted that it should still be possible to distinguish between potentially harmful ultra-processed foods and healthier dietary options, much like alcoholic beverages are regulated differently from other drinks.
The researchers argue that UPFs meet several established criteria used to identify addictive substances, including product designs that may encourage compulsive consumption. Regardless of whether UPFs qualify as addictive in a strict scientific sense, the authors emphasize that their link to rising health problems remains well documented.
The study recommends adopting strategies similar to tobacco control measures, including stricter marketing regulations, industry accountability and structural public health interventions.
However, not all experts fully agree with the comparison. Professor Martin Warren, chief scientific officer at the Quadram Institute, acknowledged parallels but cautioned against drawing direct equivalence between nicotine addiction and UPF consumption. He suggested that it remains unclear whether UPFs are chemically addictive or whether they primarily exploit behavioral preferences and convenience.
Professor Warren also noted that health risks associated with UPFs may partly stem from their replacement of nutrient-rich whole foods.
Dr Githinji Gitahi, chief executive of Amref Health Africa, warned that the expansion of ultra-processed food markets, especially in regions with weaker regulatory systems, is placing additional strain on public health infrastructure. He emphasized that without stronger government-led interventions, the rising burden of non-communicable diseases could overwhelm healthcare systems.
As research continues to explore the long-term health effects of ultra-processed foods, the debate highlights a larger question: whether modern food environments are shaping consumer choices in ways that demand stronger regulatory oversight.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited