You are what you eat, and to science it is true. People live longer based on what they choose to eat. With such a thought, Canadians took on to a UK-based challenge of eating vegan for a month. The challenge is called Veganuary (Vegan + January). For many, it is not a hidden fact that eating less meat and more plants is good for our health and it can cut food-related emissions, which make up to a third of the greenhouse causing climate change. However, going vegan isn't really a smooth change, rather a big step. It means to revamp our entire diet.
The good news is, that there have been researches that prove that even relatively small substitutions of red meat with plant-based proteins like tofu, lentils and beans can add months, sometimes years to our expected lifespan. It can also make a noticeable dent in our carbon footprint.
As per 2018, only 7.1% of Canadians were vegetarian and 2.3% were vegan. Olivia Auclair, a research fellow at the University of Oxford, who researched on Canadian's eating habits told CBC that Canadians get 65% of their protein from animal sources. Only 5% of the protein comes from the high-protein plant-based sources. Some of these are also included in Canada's Food Guide.
It is true that eating habits, along with shopping habits are hard to change, this is why Auclair's research tried to bring people more in line with the food guide. The Canada Food Guide recommends lots of fruits, vegetables and whole grain, along with protein from both animal and plant sources.
ALSO READ: Is Plant-Based Cheese The Future?
Her research was published last year in the journal Nature Food, titled Partial substitutions of animal with plant protein foods in Canadian diets have synergies and trade-offs among nutrition, health and climate outcomes, found that replacing half their red and processed meat would increase people's life expectancy an average of nine months, while cutting their diet-related carbon footprint by 25%.
For her research, she analyzed what 13,600 Canadians ate based on the Statistics Canada data from "food diaries" recorded by them in 2015. After that, she modelled what could happen if the same people substituted 25 to 50% of the red and processed meat they had been consuming with plant-based proteins. However, they did not change their poultry, fish or seafood intake.
The results were great, as mentioned above. In fact, there was more. The health benefits were double for men compared to women!
Men gained one full year of increased life expectancy, on average. This is also because men eat more red and processed meats and the climate benefits were also higher for men cutting down on the meat.
CHECK OUT: Can A Vegan Diet Help You Loose Weight ?
In 2019, an international group of scientist recommended a planetary health diet, a plant-based diet rich in fruits, vegetables, legumes, nuts and whole grain, with small amounts of meat, dairy and fish, similar to what is recommended by the Canada Food Guide. The reason for such a recommendation was also to prevent 11 million deaths per year from processed meats and help keep greenhouse gas emission from food.
Another US study that looked at 200,000 US healthcare workers found that eating a plant-based diet could reduce a person's risk of dying by 30% from heart diseases, cancers, and respiratory diseases. Another 2021 Swedish study found a similar benefit, where it saw a 25% drop in mortality for those who adhere to a plant-based diets.
Credit: AI
High-protein diets have become increasingly popular among fitness enthusiasts and health-conscious masses.
However, a new scientific review suggests that many adults, particularly those who are sedentary, maybe consuming more protein than they actually need.
The study also shows that eating less protein rather than more may support healthier ageing by improving metabolism and reducing age-related biological changes.
The review, published by Cell Press, studied data from more than 350 studies investigating how dietary protein affects ageing and metabolic health.
Researchers concluded that reducing overall protein intake, or restricting certain amino acids like methionine, isoleucine, and valine, activates biological pathways linked to better metabolic function, cellular maintenance, and lower inflammation.
According to the researchers, several of these benefits appear to be driven by fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21), a hormone that rises when protein intake falls.
Higher FGF21 levels have been associated with better insulin sensitivity, better blood sugar regulation, increased energy expenditure, and healthier ageing in experimental models.
Lead author Dr Dudley Lamming, professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, said the growing popularity of protein-enriched foods may not benefit everyone.
"Our review suggests that reducing protein intake, rather than calories, may provide many of the same metabolic benefits while being easier for people to follow," the research team noted, adding that protein recommendations may need to be tailored according to an individual's age and physical activity rather than using a one-size-fits-all approach.
Also read: Do Most Adults Eat More Protein Than They Need? New Review Challenges The 'High-Protein' Trend
HealthandMe spoke to Dr. Mukesh Thakur, Director - Internal Medicine, Acute Medicine & Clinical Transformation, Sir H. N. Reliance Foundation Hospital, to find out who should and should not cut back on protein to improve longevity.
The doctor says that protein is essential for maintaining muscle mass, supporting immune function, and promoting overall health.
Dr Thakur says, "The optimal amount of protein varies depending on factors such as age, overall health status, and, most importantly, an individual's level of physical activity. For people who are largely sedentary, consuming very high amounts of protein may not offer additional health benefits."
He added that if the excess protein consumed is not utilized to build or maintain muscle through regular physical activity, it may contribute to excess calorie intake and increase metabolic stress.
He also explains, "Emerging research also suggests that chronically high protein intake, particularly from animal sources, may overstimulate biological pathways such as IGF-1 and mTOR, which have been linked to accelerated ageing in experimental studies."
To sum up, for individuals with obesity or diabetes, excessively high-protein diets can be particularly concerning, as they may increase the metabolic burden and are not necessarily associated with better health outcomes.
The researchers caution that the findings should not be interpreted as a recommendation for everyone to reduce protein intake.
While sedentary adults consuming excessive protein may benefit from moderation, adequate protein remains essential for older adults, athletes, pregnant women, children, and people recovering from illness or surgery to maintain muscle mass and overall health.
Credit: AI
Today, protein has found its way into everything from coffee and cereal to chips and even water. But a new scientific review suggests that for many adults, especially those who are not physically active, consuming more protein than needed may offer little benefit and could even have pose unintended health consequences.
Published in Cell Press Blue, the review analyzed more than 350 studies on restriction of protein, aging, metabolism, and longevity across humans and animal models.
Researchers concluded that while protein remains essential in one's diet, most sedentary adults are likely consuming more than they need. It also found that bringing down excess protein intake may support healthier aging.
“It’s absolutely crystal clear that there are benefits of protein to muscle growth and exercise response of active individuals,” said Dr. Dudley Lamming, aging researcher at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and the review’s corresponding author.
“But because most people are relatively sedentary, many people are likely consuming more protein than they actually need, which probably has negative health consequences,” he added.
The researchers explain that eating less protein appears to activate several biological pathways that are associated to healthy aging.
One key player is fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21), a hormone that rises when protein intake is reduced.
Higher FGF21 levels have been associated with increased energy expenditure, better blood sugar control, lower inflammation, and healthier metabolism. Animal studies have also linked elevated FGF21 to longer lifespan.
The review also highlights specific amino acids, including methionine, isoleucine, and valine, which may influence aging-related processes when consumed in excess. Restricting these amino acids appears to alleviate cellular stress and improve metabolic health in experimental studies.
Also read: No Junk Food Near Schools! Maharashtra FDA Bans Sale Of Foods & Drinks High In Fat, Salt & Sugar
Researchers caution that the findings do not mean everyone should start eating a low-protein diet.
Protein requirements vary depending on age, activity level, health status, and life stage. Athletes, pregnant women, people recovering from illness or surgery, and many older adults often require more protein for muscle maintenance and recovery.
“Recent recommendations have encouraged people to eat more protein, but they’ve also encouraged people to exercise more,” Lamming said. “We probably need to personalize protein recommendations based not just on age, but also on how physically active people are.”
For healthy adults, the recommended dietary allowance is 0.8 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight daily. Although individual needs increase with regular exercise, aging, pregnancy, or certain medical conditions.
Many adults already exceed these recommendations through regular meals alone, even before adding protein supplements.
The researchers acknowledge that much of the evidence comes from animal studies, and long-term human trials are still limited. They say future research should determine exactly who benefits from lower protein intake and who needs more.
As protein-fortified products continue to flood supermarket shelves, the researchers argue that dietary advice should become more personalized rather than assuming higher protein intake benefits everyone.
Credit: iStock
Ultra-processed foods (UPFs), typically high in salt, sugar, and unhealthy fats, have long been associated with obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and other chronic diseases.
Now, new research suggests that the vast majority of foods marketed for toddlers in the US fall into this category. A study led by the University of Texas at Austin found that more than 80% of toddler foods sold in US grocery stores are ultra-processed, while nearly half fail to meet at least one nutrient standard set by the World Health Organization (WHO) for commercial foods intended for children aged 6 to 36 months.
Researchers analyzed 2,783 toddler food products sold across 21 grocery stores in Texas. Using the Nova classification system, they found that 81% of products were ultra-processed, while 49% failed to meet at least one WHO nutrient standard.
Among the products analyzed:
Products that exceeded WHO recommendations included:
“Many parents may assume that products sold on the baby/toddler food aisles of their grocery stores have to meet certain nutrient standards. Our findings highlight that half of the toddler foods available in local grocery stores do not,” said Erin A. Hudson, a University of Texas at Austin graduate student and science policy fellow with the American Society for Nutrition.
Hudson urged parents "to be vigilant in checking labels and ingredients to determine the nutrient content and processing level of products for their toddlers".
Read More: 'Let's Fix Our Food': India Launches New Policy To Fight Childhood Obesity, Boost Nutrition
The toddler years are a crucial period for developing lifelong eating habits and taste preferences. Diets high in added sugars and ultra-processed foods during early childhood may increase the risk of obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and other chronic illnesses later in life.
The researchers found that ultra-processed toddler foods were significantly more likely to be high in sugar than less-processed alternatives. Excess sugar intake in young children has been consistently linked to poor health outcomes, including obesity and metabolic disorders.
The findings come as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is considering new guidelines for front-of-package nutrition labels, healthy claims and marketing of food products to children. The US currently does not require warning labels on any food products that are high in sugar, sodium or calories.
Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) are industrially manufactured products made with ingredients and additives rarely used in home cooking, including preservatives, emulsifiers, artificial sweeteners, colorants, flavor enhancers, and hydrogenated oils. They are generally high in refined carbohydrates, added sugars, unhealthy fats, and sodium, while being low in fiber and other essential nutrients.
Research suggests that diets high in UPFs may promote chronic inflammation, disrupt the gut microbiome, and impair insulin regulation over time, potentially increasing the risk of obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and other chronic illnesses from an early age.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited