You are what you eat, and to science it is true. People live longer based on what they choose to eat. With such a thought, Canadians took on to a UK-based challenge of eating vegan for a month. The challenge is called Veganuary (Vegan + January). For many, it is not a hidden fact that eating less meat and more plants is good for our health and it can cut food-related emissions, which make up to a third of the greenhouse causing climate change. However, going vegan isn't really a smooth change, rather a big step. It means to revamp our entire diet.

The good news is, that there have been researches that prove that even relatively small substitutions of red meat with plant-based proteins like tofu, lentils and beans can add months, sometimes years to our expected lifespan. It can also make a noticeable dent in our carbon footprint.

The Rise Of Vegetarianism

As per 2018, only 7.1% of Canadians were vegetarian and 2.3% were vegan. Olivia Auclair, a research fellow at the University of Oxford, who researched on Canadian's eating habits told CBC that Canadians get 65% of their protein from animal sources. Only 5% of the protein comes from the high-protein plant-based sources. Some of these are also included in Canada's Food Guide.

It is true that eating habits, along with shopping habits are hard to change, this is why Auclair's research tried to bring people more in line with the food guide. The Canada Food Guide recommends lots of fruits, vegetables and whole grain, along with protein from both animal and plant sources.

ALSO READ: Is Plant-Based Cheese The Future?

What is the study all about?

Her research was published last year in the journal Nature Food, titled Partial substitutions of animal with plant protein foods in Canadian diets have synergies and trade-offs among nutrition, health and climate outcomes, found that replacing half their red and processed meat would increase people's life expectancy an average of nine months, while cutting their diet-related carbon footprint by 25%.

For her research, she analyzed what 13,600 Canadians ate based on the Statistics Canada data from "food diaries" recorded by them in 2015. After that, she modelled what could happen if the same people substituted 25 to 50% of the red and processed meat they had been consuming with plant-based proteins. However, they did not change their poultry, fish or seafood intake.

The results were great, as mentioned above. In fact, there was more. The health benefits were double for men compared to women!

Men gained one full year of increased life expectancy, on average. This is also because men eat more red and processed meats and the climate benefits were also higher for men cutting down on the meat.

CHECK OUT: Can A Vegan Diet Help You Loose Weight ?

Plant-based Diets

In 2019, an international group of scientist recommended a planetary health diet, a plant-based diet rich in fruits, vegetables, legumes, nuts and whole grain, with small amounts of meat, dairy and fish, similar to what is recommended by the Canada Food Guide. The reason for such a recommendation was also to prevent 11 million deaths per year from processed meats and help keep greenhouse gas emission from food.

Another US study that looked at 200,000 US healthcare workers found that eating a plant-based diet could reduce a person's risk of dying by 30% from heart diseases, cancers, and respiratory diseases. Another 2021 Swedish study found a similar benefit, where it saw a 25% drop in mortality for those who adhere to a plant-based diets.

Drinking a sugary beverage every day may be linked to a significantly higher risk of stomach cancer, according to a new study that researchers described as the first of its kind.

The study found that people who consumed at least one sugar-sweetened beverage everyday had 2.45 times the risk of developing gastric cancer compared with those who consumed fewer drinks in a month.

The findings were based on data obtained from 112,284 participants enrolled in the Nurses' Health Study and Health Professionals Follow-Up Study. Over the follow-up period, 278 participants developed gastric cancer.

Researchers from Mass General Brigham Cancer Institute and other institutions published their findings in Gastro Hep Advances.

Daily Sugary Drinks Linked To Higher Stomach Cancer Risk

The researchers examined participants' intake of sugar-sweetened beverages, including regular soft drinks, punch, lemonade and sports drinks.

After accounting for other potential risk factors, people who drank at least one serving of these beverages every day had a 2.45-fold higher risk of gastric cancer than those who consumed them less than once a month.

The association was even stronger among women in the Nurses' Health Study. Women who consumed more than one sugary drink a day had a 3.04-fold higher risk of stomach cancer compared with women who rarely consumed them. The study did not find a similar association between artificially sweetened beverages and gastric cancer.

Also read: How Brachytherapy Is Personalising Radiation Therapy For Breast Cancer

Researchers Think Sugar And Fructose Are Possible Factors

The researchers also looked at participants' intake of fructose, a type of sugar commonly found in sweetened beverages. Higher fructose consumption was associated with a greater incidence of gastric cancer, although the study could not establish exactly why.

Excessive sugar consumption can contribute to several metabolic changes, including weight gain and inflammation, which are being investigated as possible pathways connecting sugary drinks with cancer. However, the researchers stressed that the biological mechanism behind the association is still not established.

Senior author Andrew T. Chan, a gastroenterologist and epidemiologist at Mass General Brigham, said the study addresses an area that has received relatively little attention.

“This is the first study to demonstrate an association between sugar-sweetened beverage intake and gastric cancer in a U.S. population.” Chan noted that stomach cancer remains a major global health burden and is the fifth leading cause of cancer death worldwide.

Also read: Moderna and Merck’s Custom-Made mRNA Cancer Vaccine Shows Promise In Late-Stage Melanoma Trial

H. Pylori Infection Maybe A Common Denominator

The researchers also considered Helicobacter pylori, or H. pylori, a bacterium and one of the most common risk factors for stomach cancer. Among a smaller group of 940 participants for whom information about H. pylori was available, more than one-third showed evidence of infection. However, researchers did not find a clear relationship between sugary-drink consumption and H. pylori infection.

This suggests that the association between sugary beverages and stomach cancer may not simply be explained by sugary drinks increasing the likelihood of H. pylori infection. More research is needed to understand the connection.

Study Does Not Prove Sugary Drinks Cause Cancer

The study was observational, meaning it identified an association but could not establish that consuming sugary drinks directly causes stomach cancer.

Researchers also pointed to several limitations, including limited information about H. pylori infection and family history of stomach cancer. Most participants were also white, which could limit how broadly the findings can be applied to other populations.

Many people think that controlling blood sugar is just about avoiding sugary foods or cutting back on carbohydrates. Sure, what you eat is important but so is when you eat, especially if you have diabetes, prediabetes or insulin resistance.

Why Morning May Be A Better Time To Eat

Your body has an internal clock called the circadian rhythm. And, this impacts your sleep, digestion, hormone release and how your body metabolises energy. The stomach, intestine, liver, pancreas, muscles and fat tissue all work in coordination with this rhythm. In simple terms, the body is generally more prepared to digest and use food during the earlier part of the day.

Hormones also follow a daily pattern. Cortisol, for instance, is naturally more active in the morning, while growth hormone has greater activity at night and in the early hours of the day. Since the body is metabolically more active in the morning, it is often able to handle glucose and protein more efficiently at this time.

This is why having a balanced breakfast at a reasonable time, preferably before 9 am where possible, can be helpful for glycaemic control. It does not mean that breakfast has to be large or heavy. It means that the first meal of the day should be nutritious and should not be delayed unnecessarily.

Also read: Why Sustainable Weight Loss Requires More Than Cutting Calories?

How Skipping Breakfast Can Affect Blood Sugar

Eating early also prevents the long gap without food that can lead to tiredness, excessive hunger and overeating later in the day. By not eating breakfast, a person may be starving by lunchtime and may eat larger portions or foods high in refined carbohydrates. It can cause larger fluctuations in blood sugar.

Those with diabetes who are on insulin or other glucose-lowering medications in particular should eat regular meals. Skipping or delaying food can sometimes lead to hypoglycaemia, or low blood sugar. So, this may cause sweating, shakiness, dizziness, weakness or sudden hunger. In response, a person may overeat, which can then lead to a sharp rise in blood sugar and make overall control more difficult.

Also read: Study Links Lower Protein Intake To Healthy Ageing; Expert Explains Who Should & Shouldn't Cut Back

Should Dinner Be Your Lightest Meal?

The old saying, “Eat breakfast like a king, lunch like a prince and dinner like a pauper,” still has relevance. It does not mean overeating at breakfast. Rather, it reminds us not to make dinner the heaviest meal of the day, especially when it is eaten late.

A good breakfast can include protein, fibre and a moderate amount of carbohydrates. Eggs, curd, paneer, dal, sprouts, vegetables, nuts and whole grains are practical options. Timely eating, along with balanced meals, regular activity, prescribed medicines and medical follow up, can go a long way in improving blood sugar control.

The mukbangs, it a giant burrito in 5 bites, rock–paper–scissors “run and eat” challenge may look like harmless fun on Instagram, but medically, it’s a messy combination of speed, adrenaline and food. Your body simply isn’t built to sprint one second and swallow food the next, and that’s exactly why doctors are raising alarms.

When Running And Eating Collide

When you suddenly take off running, your system shifts into “performance mode.” Blood flow is pushed toward your muscles, your breathing gets heavier, and your heart rate shoots up. In that state, the body is not prioritising digestion, it’s prioritising oxygen and movement. If you try to eat immediately afterwards, your swallowing reflex is out of sync, your breathing is irregular, and your diaphragm is still working overtime. That makes choking far more likely than people realise, even with small bites.

What Happens To Your Digestion After Intense Exercise

Then there’s the digestive side. Eating right after a sprint forces the stomach to start working while the body is still in high-alert mode. This can lead to sudden acidity, cramps, indigestion, or even vomiting. Some people experience a sharp head rush or dizziness because the nervous system gets confused between “cool down” and “start digesting.” It’s a physiologically chaotic moment and food doesn’t belong in it.

Also read: Can Drinking Coffee Make You Leaner, Healthier? Study Decodes The Link

Another concern is behavioural. These challenges make speed-eating and chaotic eating patterns look entertaining. Young people often imitate trends without understanding the risks, and this normalises the idea that food is something to be shoved in quickly or eaten competitively. Over time, this can dull the body’s natural hunger and fullness cues.

The Social Media Trend May Be Fun, But Your Body Pays The Price

By Dr Chetan Kalal, DM Hepatologist and Liver Transplant Specialist, Saifee Hospital, Mumbai