Food safety concerns are up and front in the country again, with recent recalls hitting the retail shelves of organically grown carrots, slivered onions, and liverwurst sold by brands that include Boar's Head and McDonald's. Some question whether these high-profile incidents herald deeper challenges for the U.S. food safety system. But experts caution not to panic-and they point to improvements in detection and response as reasons why recall news is so prominent.

While the increase in recalls may alarm, it could be a sign that foodborne illnesses are increasingly being found and handled faster rather than a sign of a failing system. Rutgers University food science department chair Don Schaffner said the tools of whole genome sequencing now allow health officials to pinpoint and track an outbreak with precision in a way that simply wasn't possible before. That quick identification allows public health officials to move fast-to interview victims, trace sources of contamination-when a problem surfaces.

Public health expert Craig Hedberg at the University of Minnesota comments that many of these outbreaks would have otherwise gone undetected. Advanced surveillance and laboratory analysis allow small clusters of illness to be linked directly to a source, so recalls can be issued and public advisories can be released on time.

"When these outbreaks are identified and investigated, steps can be taken to protect public health," Hedberg says. "That's why there's a strong interest in keeping the public informed." Food Recalls Are on the Rise, but is it Necessarily Bad News?

Outbreaks of foodborne illnesses are by nature hard to predict. According to Schaffner, the recent clustering of high-profile incidents could simply be coincidental and not indicative of a systemic problem.

The eating habits and food production also make their contribution to the changes in food safety. Food safety expert Darin Detwiler from Northeastern University points out that the more people choose ready meals and restaurant meals, the greater the complexity of food supply chains becomes. Ingredients travel further, go through multiple processing steps, and change hands several times before consumers get them, and the possibilities of contamination increase.

Is the patchwork approach to blame for food safety regulation?

The U.S. food safety system operates on an intricate network of agencies, each covering different aspects of regulation; the USDA focuses on meat and poultry, while the FDA monitors most other food items, including overseeing recalls. In outbreak situations, the CDC works in conjunction with local health departments to investigate and contain the spread of illnesses.

Despite this overall framework, gaps in food safety can occur. Civil litigation serves as a safety net when food-borne diseases slip through regulatory cracks. According to Timothy Lytton, a professor at Georgia State College of Law, liability suits compel food producers to adhere to strict safety standards. Insurance companies, which cover potential risks, will also help through counseling and the promotion of incentives to minimize the risk involved.

Protecting Yourself from Foodborne Illness

As regulatory agencies and companies continue to work on the safety of food, it also remains crucially important for consumers to be proactive at home. Here are some steps:

1. Monitoring Food Recalls: Stay on top of recalls through FDA updates and remove affected products from your kitchen.

2. Hygiene and Its Practices: Be sure to wash your hands thoroughly with soap and water before touching and after handling food.

3. Wash Fresh Fruits and Vegetables: Even those that are pre-washed should still be washed under running water to remove unseen bacteria, especially from crevices or wounded areas.

4. Prevent Cross-Contamination: Separate cutting boards and utensils must be used for raw meat and fresh fruits and vegetables.

5. Cook Food Properly: Meat, Poultry, and Seafood must be cooked to a safe internal temperature to kill harmful microorganisms.

While food recalls can be scary, they are also a reflection of advances in monitoring and responding to food safety. For instance, due to advances in technology and surveillance, outbreaks may now be detected and contained faster than ever before, thus mitigating the potential risks to public health.

Meanwhile, the increased complexity of the food industry underscores that vigilance needs to be taken at every step of the supply chain. With knowledge, safe food-handling practices, consumers can participate actively in protecting themselves and their families from foodborne diseases.

In the end, the increasing profile of food recalls is as much a story of solutions as of problems — reminding one and all that protecting our food supply is a shared responsibility that involves regulators, producers, and consumers.

A growing body of research is raising fresh concerns about how deeply smartphones are shaping not just attention spans, but also eating habits and self-image among young people. A recent study published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research has found that excessive and compulsive smartphone use may significantly increase the risk of disordered eating behaviors in adolescents and young adults.

Smartphones Could Turn Into Dependency

The study centers on what researchers describe as Problematic Smartphone Use, or PSU. This is not simply spending long hours on a device, but a pattern marked by psychological dependence, difficulty cutting back, and anxiety when separated from the phone. Unlike casual or necessary screen time, PSU begins to interfere with daily functioning and emotional well-being.

To understand the scale of the issue, researchers analyzed 35 studies involving more than 52,000 participants, with an average age of 17. The findings paint a worrying picture. Young individuals who showed signs of smartphone dependency were more likely to engage in unhealthy eating behaviors. These included emotional overeating, uncontrolled food consumption, and patterns resembling food addiction, even in the absence of a formal diagnosis.

A 7-hour Tipping Point

One of the most striking findings of the study is the identification of a potential threshold. The risk of disordered eating rose significantly among those who used their smartphones for more than seven hours a day. While this may not seem unusual in an increasingly digital world, the study suggests that crossing this limit could have tangible effects on both mental and physical health.

A key factor driving this link appears to be body image dissatisfaction. Constant exposure to curated and often unrealistic images on social media platforms can distort perceptions of beauty and self-worth. Over time, this can lead to unhealthy comparisons and a strained relationship with food.

More Than Screen Time

Importantly, the researchers highlight that not all screen time carries the same risk. The distinction between general use and PSU is crucial. It is the compulsive nature of usage, accompanied by withdrawal symptoms and loss of control, that is most strongly associated with negative outcomes.

The study does not claim that smartphones directly cause eating disorders. Instead, they act as a contributing factor that can amplify existing vulnerabilities, particularly in impressionable age groups.

Wider Mental Health Implications

Beyond eating behaviors, excessive smartphone use has also been linked to anxiety, depression, lower physical activity levels, and reduced productivity. These interconnected issues suggest that digital habits are playing a broader role in shaping overall health.

What Could Help?

Experts suggest that small, consistent changes can make a difference. Setting clear boundaries for screen time, taking regular breaks, and engaging in offline activities such as sports or hobbies can help restore balance. Encouraging mindful use of technology, especially among younger users, is increasingly being seen as an important step in both prevention and intervention.

As smartphones continue to be an inseparable part of daily life, the study highlights the need to look beyond convenience and consider their deeper psychological impact.

Tuberculosis continues to be one of India’s most persistent infectious diseases, but beyond medicines and diagnostics, one factor often decides how well a patient recovers or resists infection in the first place: nutrition. Experts say food and lifestyle are not just supportive elements in TB care. They are central to both recovery and prevention.

Why Nutrition Matters More Than You Think

Tuberculosis and malnutrition are closely linked. The infection weakens the body, reduces appetite, and leads to weight loss, while poor nutrition further lowers immunity, making it harder to fight the disease. Research, including findings published in PubMed Central, shows that undernutrition significantly increases the risk of developing active TB and worsens outcomes during treatment.

Dr Mihir Gangakhedkar explains that TB is both a cause and effect of protein energy malnutrition. In simple terms, poor dietary habits can increase susceptibility, and the disease itself further drains nutritional reserves. To counter this, patients often require nearly 1.5 times their usual calorie intake to regain weight and strength.

Read: Is Cough Really Necessary For TB? 80% Of Patients Don't Have It, Says Study

What Should TB Patients Eat?

Experts agree that rebuilding the body starts with prioritizing protein and calorie intake.

Dr Sumeet Singhania recommends including protein-rich foods such as eggs, lentils, dairy products, and meat to help repair tissues and regain muscle mass. Dr Gangakhedkar echoes this, adding paneer, curd, and even protein supplements if needed.

Alongside protein, micronutrients play a critical role. Colorful fruits and vegetables provide vitamins A and C, which support immune function and recovery. Whole grains like millets offer sustained energy, which is crucial for patients dealing with fatigue.

Another key takeaway from research is consistency. The RATIONS study in India demonstrated that improving dietary intake among families of TB patients reduced disease incidence by nearly 40 percent. This highlights that nutrition is not just important for patients, but also for those living with them.

Patients are also advised to avoid processed and junk foods, which offer little nutritional value and may slow recovery.

Read: World Tuberculosis Day 2026: Theme, Origin, And Significance

Can Lifestyle Changes Prevent TB?

While TB spreads through airborne droplets, not everyone exposed develops the disease. Immunity plays a decisive role here.

Dr Harsha Jain emphasizes that a strong immune system can significantly reduce the risk of developing active TB. This includes maintaining a balanced diet, engaging in regular physical activity, getting adequate sleep, and managing stress.

Certain habits can increase vulnerability. Smoking damages the lungs and weakens local immunity, while excessive alcohol intake can impair overall immune response. Avoiding these is considered essential.

Environmental factors also matter. Good ventilation reduces the concentration of infectious droplets in the air, and simple practices like covering the mouth while coughing can limit transmission. Early screening, especially for high-risk individuals, adds another layer of protection.

Food, Habits And Recovery Go Hand In Hand

TB treatment is often long and demanding, but recovery is not driven by medication alone. A nutrient-rich diet helps the body heal faster, regain weight, and tolerate treatment better. At the same time, healthy lifestyle choices strengthen immunity and reduce the chances of infection or relapse.

In a country where TB remains widespread, these everyday choices can quietly make a powerful difference.

Dr. Sumeet Singhania is a Consultant, Pulmonary Medicine at Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital, Mumbai

Dr Harsha Jain is a Consultant - Pulmonologist at Sahyadri Super Specialty, Deccan

Dr. Mihir Gangakhedkar is a Consultant - Pulmonology at Fortis Hospital Mulund, Mumbai

Hyderabad pediatrician Dr. Sivaranjani Santosh shared on X, previously Twitter that she has been sent a notice by JTNL Consumer Health (India) Private Limited, a Kenvue Inc. company. The notice claimed that Dr Sivaranjini has been maligning the names of ORSL and ERZL for her "own commercial benefits" and for "increasing the number of followers" on her page.

Also Read: Shigella Cases Rise To 12 In Kerala: Doctor Explains Why The Bacterial Infection Is Fatal For Young Kids

Dr Sivaranjini has been campaigning that commercial beverages labeled as ORS were often high in sugar and nutritionally different from the WHO-recommended Oral Rehydration Solution, a life-saving treatment for dehydration. In a statement following the court order, Dr. Sivaranjani said, “The long battle we have won! ORSL cannot produce new high-sugar ORSL, but it wants to clear out its existing ₹180 crore stock. India, please stand with me! People’s power has to win against corporate lobbying.”

Dr Sivaranjini claims that this is why she has been sent a notice by the company. However, the truth is that ORSL or ERZL, while specializes in hydration solution and claims it as solutions for illness and daily fluid replenishment, however, it does not match the WHO standards.

Also Read: Beat The Heat With ORS: How To Know Which One Is Real?

A Doctor's 8-year-long Fight Against Fake ORS

In 2022, Dr Sivaranjini filed a Public Interest Litigation in the Telangana High Court seeking directions for manufacturers to remove the letters “ORS” from the product name ORSL. Following the petition, companies began promoting the idea of “silent dehydration,” a term that does not appear in recognised medical literature, to market the drink.

the problem is that while there are disclaimers on the ORSL tetra packs that state: “Do not use during diarrhoea,” but these disclaimers are often printed in very small fonts, and easy to overlook. “Pharmacists also prefer selling ORSL because they earn a higher margin, as ORSL is twice as expensive as standard ORS solutions,” said Dr Sivaranjini.

Dr Sivaranjini has documented cases of children developing life-threatening dehydration despite being administered drinks marketed as ORS. These are so-called "repair solution" drinks, as she calls them, which contain excessive sugar and inadequate salt and electrolyte ratios and can undermine the purpose of a life-saving medical formulation, which is recognized by the WHO.

Dr Santosh explains: "During diarrhoea, high-sugar drinks should be avoided because excess sugar can worsen the condition.When ORSL was introduced, manufacturers met with paediatricians, leading many to believe it was ORS. But in reality, the sugar content in ORSL is as high as in packaged soft/fruit drinks, with only a little extra sodium. We noticed that many children’s diarrhoea worsened. When we investigated we realised ORSL is not the same as ORS.”

What Is ORS?

It is an adequate glucose-electrolyte solution called the Oral Rehydration Salts (ORS) solution. It was first used in 1969, and then a new solution has been recommended by the WHO and the UNICEF since 2003. This use of ORS formulation, as WHO mentions has improved effectiveness from as compared to the old solution.