Food Recalls Are on the Rise, but is it Necessarily Bad News?
Food safety concerns are up and front in the country again, with recent recalls hitting the retail shelves of organically grown carrots, slivered onions, and liverwurst sold by brands that include Boar's Head and McDonald's. Some question whether these high-profile incidents herald deeper challenges for the U.S. food safety system. But experts caution not to panic-and they point to improvements in detection and response as reasons why recall news is so prominent.
While the increase in recalls may alarm, it could be a sign that foodborne illnesses are increasingly being found and handled faster rather than a sign of a failing system. Rutgers University food science department chair Don Schaffner said the tools of whole genome sequencing now allow health officials to pinpoint and track an outbreak with precision in a way that simply wasn't possible before. That quick identification allows public health officials to move fast-to interview victims, trace sources of contamination-when a problem surfaces.
Public health expert Craig Hedberg at the University of Minnesota comments that many of these outbreaks would have otherwise gone undetected. Advanced surveillance and laboratory analysis allow small clusters of illness to be linked directly to a source, so recalls can be issued and public advisories can be released on time.
"When these outbreaks are identified and investigated, steps can be taken to protect public health," Hedberg says. "That's why there's a strong interest in keeping the public informed." Food Recalls Are on the Rise, but is it Necessarily Bad News?
Outbreaks of foodborne illnesses are by nature hard to predict. According to Schaffner, the recent clustering of high-profile incidents could simply be coincidental and not indicative of a systemic problem.
The eating habits and food production also make their contribution to the changes in food safety. Food safety expert Darin Detwiler from Northeastern University points out that the more people choose ready meals and restaurant meals, the greater the complexity of food supply chains becomes. Ingredients travel further, go through multiple processing steps, and change hands several times before consumers get them, and the possibilities of contamination increase.
The U.S. food safety system operates on an intricate network of agencies, each covering different aspects of regulation; the USDA focuses on meat and poultry, while the FDA monitors most other food items, including overseeing recalls. In outbreak situations, the CDC works in conjunction with local health departments to investigate and contain the spread of illnesses.
Despite this overall framework, gaps in food safety can occur. Civil litigation serves as a safety net when food-borne diseases slip through regulatory cracks. According to Timothy Lytton, a professor at Georgia State College of Law, liability suits compel food producers to adhere to strict safety standards. Insurance companies, which cover potential risks, will also help through counseling and the promotion of incentives to minimize the risk involved.
As regulatory agencies and companies continue to work on the safety of food, it also remains crucially important for consumers to be proactive at home. Here are some steps:
1. Monitoring Food Recalls: Stay on top of recalls through FDA updates and remove affected products from your kitchen.
2. Hygiene and Its Practices: Be sure to wash your hands thoroughly with soap and water before touching and after handling food.
3. Wash Fresh Fruits and Vegetables: Even those that are pre-washed should still be washed under running water to remove unseen bacteria, especially from crevices or wounded areas.
4. Prevent Cross-Contamination: Separate cutting boards and utensils must be used for raw meat and fresh fruits and vegetables.
5. Cook Food Properly: Meat, Poultry, and Seafood must be cooked to a safe internal temperature to kill harmful microorganisms.
While food recalls can be scary, they are also a reflection of advances in monitoring and responding to food safety. For instance, due to advances in technology and surveillance, outbreaks may now be detected and contained faster than ever before, thus mitigating the potential risks to public health.
Meanwhile, the increased complexity of the food industry underscores that vigilance needs to be taken at every step of the supply chain. With knowledge, safe food-handling practices, consumers can participate actively in protecting themselves and their families from foodborne diseases.
In the end, the increasing profile of food recalls is as much a story of solutions as of problems — reminding one and all that protecting our food supply is a shared responsibility that involves regulators, producers, and consumers.
Guavas Better Than Blueberries (Photos: Canva)
Tiny but mighty, eating blueberries not only gives you a sweet taste but also can be extremely beneficial for your entire body.
Extremely rich in antioxidants called anthocyanins, they help with slowing down brain aging. Along with this, the fruit also helps regulates blood pressure and cholesterol levels, overall improving cardiovascular health.
Although they might sound beneficial, they are pricey and inaccessible to a majority of the public.
However, experts have now revealed that guava can provide the body with more benefits than blueberries at half the price.
Why Is Guava Better Than Blueberries?Guavas are living proof that appearances are deceptive. Packed with nearly five times more Vitamin C (about 228mg) and loaded with digestive fibers, this winter fruit is perfectly suited for everyday snacking.
According to Healthline, a single guava can fulfill 12 percent of your recommended daily intake of fiber. A 2025 overview by PubMed also shows that guava leaves have been researched for managing blood sugar levels.
Guavas contain soluble fibers which slow down the digestion and absorption of sugars, preventing sudden spikes in glucose levels. Previous research also shows that regular consumption can help improve insulin sensitivity and lipid profiles, benefiting metabolic health.
With significantly higher Vitamin C content than blueberries, this fruit supports collagen production and gives you brighter skin and protection against premature aging.
While cranberries support urinary tract health by preventing bacterial adhesion and reducing inflammation, strawberries are rich in Vitamin C and folate and help with blood sugar regulation which can help stabilize glucose levels.
After all the environmental damage and aging that you have caused your skin, it deserves the utmost care and protection to rebuild and glow.
While blueberries have been linked to improving skin texture, goji berries are far rich in flavonoids that can neutralize free radicals, boost collagen and protect against UV damage.
Blackberries and raspberries are excellent sources that reduce oxidative stress and inflammation.
Experts recommend incorporating a mix of these fruits in your diet to help repair your DNA, reduce inflammation and prevent chronic conditions.
Credits: Canva
If you drink 14 drinks per week, the American Cancer Society's peer-reviewed journal Cancer, noted that you have a 25% higher risk of developing colorectal cancer. This also means that you have a 95% higher risk of developing rectal cancer as compared to those who drink an average of one drink per week.
Moderate alcohol intake is measured as seven or less drinks per week, which is associated with a lower risk. However, experts have time and again stressed that there is no safe limit of drinking.
"While the data on former drinkers were sparse, we were encouraged to see that their risk may return to that of the light drinkers,” co–senior author Erikka Loftfield of the National Institutes of Health's National Cancer Institute said in a news release.
The findings come from an analysis of U.S. adults who took part in the National Cancer Institute’s Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial. Researchers tracked 88,092 participants over a 20 year period and identified 1,679 cases of colorectal cancer during that time.
The data showed a clear pattern. Higher lifetime alcohol consumption was linked to a higher risk of colorectal cancer, with the strongest association seen for rectal cancer. However, the study also offered encouraging news. People who stopped drinking saw their risk decline, highlighting that lifestyle changes can still make a difference later in life.
Read: Drinking Alcohol Could Damage Your DNA, Not Just Your Liver Or Heart
These findings come at a time of growing concern about colorectal cancer rates, especially among younger people. Earlier this month, the American Cancer Society reported that colorectal cancer has become the leading cause of cancer-related deaths among people under 50 in the United States.
Dr. Ahmedin Jemal, senior author of the report and senior vice president of surveillance, prevention and health services research at the American Cancer Society, said the trend is alarming. He noted that the speed at which colorectal cancer rates have risen among younger adults means it can no longer be considered a disease that only affects older people.
Also Read: Diljit Dosanjh Swears By This Green Juice to Power His 4am to 9pm Routine
Federal health guidance around alcohol has also shifted. Instead of specifying how many drinks are considered safe, the latest dietary guidelines advise Americans to drink less overall. People with certain health conditions are encouraged to avoid alcohol entirely.
Christopher Kahler, director of the Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies at Brown University, has previously explained that no amount of drinking is completely risk-free. According to him, health risks increase with higher consumption, which is why current guidelines focus on reducing intake rather than defining a safe threshold.
Taken together, the research reinforces a simple message. Heavy drinking raises cancer risk, drinking less is better for health, and stopping alcohol use can help lower the chances of developing colorectal cancer. With rates rising in younger adults, experts say awareness and prevention efforts are more important than ever.
Credits: iStock
In many parts of the world, sun is again unseen, thanks to the extended winters. Does this mean you should worry about your vitamin D levels? Yes. However, it does not mean that everyone needs to rush to the nearest pharmacy for supplements.
Health and Me had previously reported on the adverse impact of overdosing on vitamin D supplements. Now, a new study by The Austrian Association for Consumer Information (VKI), and Stiftung Warentest, a German consumer organization tested 22 supplements and found that only two were suitable for preventing a deficiency.
Also Read: NHS Doctors Warn Vitamin D Users About Four Key Overdose Symptoms
Of these, only GSE and Rotbäckchen were noted to be safe for use. Markus Herrmann, head of the Institute of Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics at the Medical University of Graz, said, "Based on the available data, reputable professional societies do not recommend vitamin D supplementation for healthy adults."
VKI found that 20 out of the 22 products tested were overdose. The worst offenders, according to the study were products from: Hübner, Dekristolvit, Alsiroyal, and Sanotact. Their recommended daily dose exceeded that of the GSE product, which is considered effective, by a factor of 20.
VKI generally advises against the use of vitamin D supplements without consulting doctor. However, the belief that vitamin D is essential still persist. Who are at most risk? The answer is: children, elderly, pregnant women, and people who do not get much sun exposure or cover their skin are most likely to be deficient.
Also Read: After NHS Warning On Vitamin D, Turkish Expert Too Warns Of Poisoning
Vitamin D has unique characters that makes it different from vitamin C, another popular supplements. It is a steroid that acts as a hormone in the body and is one of the fat-soluble vitamin. This means, it could be stored in fat and muscles, that too for a relatively long time, says Herrmann.
People who spent a lot of time outdoors in summers only begin to deplete their vitamin D levels in February, which is almost the end of winters. Even after this, a few hours a week in fresh air and winter sunlight is enough to produce sufficient vitamin D again.
However, experts point out that because vitamin D is stored, this is what makes it difficult to be excreted, especially when the doses are high. It remains in the body and could harm the person.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited