Food safety concerns are up and front in the country again, with recent recalls hitting the retail shelves of organically grown carrots, slivered onions, and liverwurst sold by brands that include Boar's Head and McDonald's. Some question whether these high-profile incidents herald deeper challenges for the U.S. food safety system. But experts caution not to panic-and they point to improvements in detection and response as reasons why recall news is so prominent.

While the increase in recalls may alarm, it could be a sign that foodborne illnesses are increasingly being found and handled faster rather than a sign of a failing system. Rutgers University food science department chair Don Schaffner said the tools of whole genome sequencing now allow health officials to pinpoint and track an outbreak with precision in a way that simply wasn't possible before. That quick identification allows public health officials to move fast-to interview victims, trace sources of contamination-when a problem surfaces.

Public health expert Craig Hedberg at the University of Minnesota comments that many of these outbreaks would have otherwise gone undetected. Advanced surveillance and laboratory analysis allow small clusters of illness to be linked directly to a source, so recalls can be issued and public advisories can be released on time.

"When these outbreaks are identified and investigated, steps can be taken to protect public health," Hedberg says. "That's why there's a strong interest in keeping the public informed." Food Recalls Are on the Rise, but is it Necessarily Bad News?

Outbreaks of foodborne illnesses are by nature hard to predict. According to Schaffner, the recent clustering of high-profile incidents could simply be coincidental and not indicative of a systemic problem.

The eating habits and food production also make their contribution to the changes in food safety. Food safety expert Darin Detwiler from Northeastern University points out that the more people choose ready meals and restaurant meals, the greater the complexity of food supply chains becomes. Ingredients travel further, go through multiple processing steps, and change hands several times before consumers get them, and the possibilities of contamination increase.

Is the patchwork approach to blame for food safety regulation?

The U.S. food safety system operates on an intricate network of agencies, each covering different aspects of regulation; the USDA focuses on meat and poultry, while the FDA monitors most other food items, including overseeing recalls. In outbreak situations, the CDC works in conjunction with local health departments to investigate and contain the spread of illnesses.

Despite this overall framework, gaps in food safety can occur. Civil litigation serves as a safety net when food-borne diseases slip through regulatory cracks. According to Timothy Lytton, a professor at Georgia State College of Law, liability suits compel food producers to adhere to strict safety standards. Insurance companies, which cover potential risks, will also help through counseling and the promotion of incentives to minimize the risk involved.

Protecting Yourself from Foodborne Illness

As regulatory agencies and companies continue to work on the safety of food, it also remains crucially important for consumers to be proactive at home. Here are some steps:

1. Monitoring Food Recalls: Stay on top of recalls through FDA updates and remove affected products from your kitchen.

2. Hygiene and Its Practices: Be sure to wash your hands thoroughly with soap and water before touching and after handling food.

3. Wash Fresh Fruits and Vegetables: Even those that are pre-washed should still be washed under running water to remove unseen bacteria, especially from crevices or wounded areas.

4. Prevent Cross-Contamination: Separate cutting boards and utensils must be used for raw meat and fresh fruits and vegetables.

5. Cook Food Properly: Meat, Poultry, and Seafood must be cooked to a safe internal temperature to kill harmful microorganisms.

While food recalls can be scary, they are also a reflection of advances in monitoring and responding to food safety. For instance, due to advances in technology and surveillance, outbreaks may now be detected and contained faster than ever before, thus mitigating the potential risks to public health.

Meanwhile, the increased complexity of the food industry underscores that vigilance needs to be taken at every step of the supply chain. With knowledge, safe food-handling practices, consumers can participate actively in protecting themselves and their families from foodborne diseases.

In the end, the increasing profile of food recalls is as much a story of solutions as of problems — reminding one and all that protecting our food supply is a shared responsibility that involves regulators, producers, and consumers.

Walk through a grocery store today and even chips and pastries come in "protein-boosted" versions. Nutrition experts at Stanford Medicine say this trend, often called "protein-maxxing," has outrun the science behind it.

The real picture is more nuanced. Some people do need more protein than official guidelines once suggested, but for most, the bigger problem lies elsewhere in the diet, not in a shortage of protein. Here's what the research actually shows.

1. Your body does need protein

Protein is one of three macronutrients, along with carbs and fat, and your body can't skip it. Dietary protein breaks down into amino acids, the building blocks used to make your own body's proteins.

"Protein can take the form of your muscles, your hair, your skin, everything has protein in it," said Jonathan Long, an associate professor of pathology at Stanford. Of the 20 amino acids your body needs, nine can only come from food.

2. The official recommendation just changed, and the old number was debated for decades

Until early 2026, the US RDA for protein was 0.8 grams per kilogram of body weight, a figure that had stood for over 80 years, according to nutrition writer Shannon Keefe.

New federal dietary guidelines released in January 2026 raised that to 1.2 to 1.6 grams per kilogram. For a 150-pound adult, that moves the daily target from about 55 grams, roughly an 8-ounce steak, up to 80-110 grams.

Also Read: New Experimental Drug May Preserve Muscle Mass During Weight Loss From Ozempic

Whether this matters for you depends on who you are. Christopher Gardner, Stanford's director of nutrition studies, says the old RDA already covers most healthy adults.

But other experts interviewed by Today's Dietitian, including sports dietitian Angie Asche, argue the 0.8g figure is too low for people trying to build muscle, adults over 65, and anyone on a weight-loss diet. The gap is partly because the original RDA was built on decades-old nitrogen-balance studies that may underestimate real needs, Keefe writes.

3. Protein matters most when you're cutting calories

Stanford Medicine notes protein becomes more important specifically when someone eats fewer calories, since a calorie deficit raises the risk of losing muscle along with fat.

This is especially relevant now, given rising use of weight-loss medications. Outside a calorie deficit, piling on extra protein doesn't offer the same payoff.

4. Fiber is the real gap in most diets

While protein gets the spotlight, fiber doesn't. Gardner points out that antioxidants which lower inflammation and help prevent cancer "don't come in meat and cheese and protein bars," per Stanford Medicine.

Only 5% of Americans meet recommended fiber intake, despite its role in gut and heart health. Beans, legumes and whole grains deliver both fiber and protein, but Americans eat less than 10 grams of legumes a day on average, Gardner says.

5. "Incomplete protein" is a myth

The old claim that plant proteins are 'incomplete' and must be paired with specific grains doesn't hold up, Gardner says. Plant proteins contain all 20 amino acids. Legumes run only slightly lower in one of them. Gardner co-authored a 2019 paper comparing amino acid profiles across animal and plant foods and found them nearly identical.

Other myths don't hold up either. There's no need to spread protein evenly across meals, says Stanford dietitian Marily Oppezzo, though older adults may need more per meal to trigger muscle growth. The post-workout 'anabolic window' is also longer than assumed, closer to 24 hours, so a protein shake right after the gym isn't essential.

More isn't automatically better. "I don't think a high-protein diet is necessarily bad, but what are you not eating?" Oppezzo asked. Chasing protein can crowd out the fiber, vitamins and antioxidants in vegetables, fruits, whole grains and nuts.

A compound your body makes after eating pomegranates, walnuts and some berries has improved heart function by up to 80% in lab models of a form of heart failure that's notoriously hard to treat. The finding comes from King's College London, and it's early, but it points at a problem doctors have struggled with for years.

The Condition With Few Treatments

The heart failure in question is called heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, or HFpEF. Here, the heart still pumps blood normally, but becomes too stiff to relax and fill properly between beats. It causes breathlessness, fatigue and a poorer quality of life, and accounts for roughly half of all heart failure cases in the UK, affecting nearly half a million people, according to King's College London's release, carried by ScienceDaily.

HFpEF has long resisted treatment because it's driven by many overlapping factors, including ageing, high blood pressure and diabetes, King's College London says. One class of diabetes drugs, called SGLT2 inhibitors, has recently changed that picture. Large trials named EMPEROR-Preserved and DELIVER found that the drugs empagliflozin and dapagliflozin cut deaths and hospital visits in HFpEF patients, and empagliflozin became the first SGLT2 inhibitor approved in the US specifically for HFpEF, according to TCTMD. But researchers still call the field wide open.

Also Read: Heart Valve Clips Explained: How a Tiny Clip Can Help Repair a Leaking Valve

What The New Study Found

Researchers led by Dr. Joseph Burgoyne found that a compound called urolithin A activates a protein named PKGIα, which helps blood vessels and heart muscle relax, King's says. In animal models of HFpEF, urolithin A improved heart function measures by as much as 80%, helped heart tissue relax better, and reduced fibrosis, the scarring that interferes with normal heart function. It also limited harmful enlargement of heart muscle cells.

The team then tested the compound in engineered human heart tissue grown from stem cells, a lab model that closely mimics real heart muscle. Urolithin A significantly improved relaxation there too, according to King's, suggesting the animal results might carry over to humans.

Notably, urolithin A has already been studied in people and has shown a good safety record, King's says. But your body doesn't get it directly from food. Instead, gut bacteria produce it by fermenting compounds found in pomegranates, walnuts and berries, according to the Global Prebiotic Association, a nutrition industry group. That means how much urolithin A a person makes can depend on which gut bacteria they have, not just what they eat.

Not A Reason To Stock Up On Pomegranates Yet

Burgoyne was careful about what the findings mean. "While there isn't enough evidence to suggest that people should eat pomegranates to treat heart failure, these findings raise the possibility that dietary approaches that enhance urolithin A production may help alleviate this condition," he said, per King's.

Professor James Leiper of the British Heart Foundation, which funded the study, struck the same note: "These findings are promising, but the benefits have so far been seen in animals and engineered human tissue, so clinical trials involving people are needed." He added that a healthy, balanced diet is still one of the best ways to protect the heart, but "no single food can prevent or treat heart disease on its own."

There is a reason why when we think about coffee, we only see ‘caffeine’ in big, bold letters. It helps up wake up, stay energetic, alert, sharpens our attention and helps us fight the midday grogginess at work. So, little attention has been paid to other components of coffee.

But new research suggests some of coffee’s effects on the brain may have little to do with caffeine.

A study published in Nature Communications found that both caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee were linked to changes in the gut microbiome, mood and stress. But improvements in learning and memory were seen specifically among people who drank decaffeinated coffee.

The findings suggest that coffee’s effects on the brain could involve its many other compounds and the gut-brain connection, rather than caffeine alone.

How Was The Study Conducted

Researchers from APC Microbiome Ireland at University College Cork studied 62 people. Thirty-one were regular coffee drinkers, while 31 did not normally drink coffee.

The regular coffee drinkers first stopped consuming coffee for two weeks. Researchers then collected stool and urine samples and monitored their mood, stress, cognition and other measures.

Coffee was subsequently reintroduced, with participants receiving either caffeinated or decaffeinated coffee for three weeks. The researchers found that both forms of coffee were associated with changes in gut bacteria and metabolites. But when it came to cognitive effects, there was a striking finding.

Also read: Andrew Huberman’s Sleep Trick: Can Eye Movements Help You Fall Back Asleep?

Decaffeinated Coffee Improved Memory

Participants who drank decaffeinated coffee showed significant improvements in learning and memory. For example, they made fewer errors on a test examining learning and memory. They also showed improvements in episodic memory, which involves remembering information and experiences.

The caffeinated group did not show the same results. This helped researchers find out that the non-caffeine components of coffee may have some positive cognitive effects.

But the researchers also acknowledge that some of the improvement could have happened due to participants becoming more familiar with the tests over time.

Also read: Gut Microbiome Linked To 3x Higher Type 1 Diabetes Risk In Children

Decaf Coffee's Effect On Brain

Coffee contains thousands of chemical compounds, including polyphenols. These compounds can interact with gut microbes and influence the production of metabolites, which can then affect the body and brain. This is where the gut-brain axis comes into the picture.

The gut and brain are in constant communication through several processes involving the nervous system, immune system, hormones and chemicals produced by gut bacteria.

The study found that coffee consumption altered the composition and activity of gut microbes and changed certain metabolites. Some bacteria, including Eggerthella species and Cryptobacterium curtum, were more found in more quantity among coffee drinkers.

Researchers believe these microbial changes could help explain some of coffee’s effects on mood and cognition.

Effects Of Caffeinated Coffee

Participants drinking caffeinated coffee experienced reduced anxiety and other psychological effects, while some measures of attention and cognitive performance also improved.

Both caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee showed lower signs of stress, depression and impulsivity.

So the study does not suggest that decaf is universally better for the brain. Instead, it shows that different components of coffee may produce different effects.

It also adds another layer to the increasingly complicated story of coffee and health. Coffee may be more than a delivery system for caffeine. Its polyphenols and other compounds may interact with gut bacteria, influencing metabolism, inflammation, mood and brain function.