Credits: Canva
Leafy greens, we all know are one of the healthiest foods on the earth. It offers so much, the benefits are countless, whether it is brain health, heart health or to control your blood sugar levels. But there is always a debate between which one is better. Spinach or kale?
So let's get into it!
Kale, we often must have heard its name listed as a "superfood". The reason is because of the rich nutrients it has to offer. However, both, spinach and kale are powerhouse leafy greens, rich in various nutrients.
If one must break down its nutrients, then we can broadly divide it between the fiber content, vitamin K, vitamin C, vitamin A, calcium, and folate.
All leafy greens are rich in dietary fiber and thus is essential for feeding your gut microbiome. This is the community of good bacteria that lives in your gut and supports your digestive health. The recommended daily amount or the RDA of fiber is 25 grams per day. So, if you go for a cup of raw spinach, this gives you around .7 grams of dietary fiber, whereas one cup of raw kale gives you a bit more. It has .9 grams of fiber.
A study published in M J Lifestyle Med titled . Closing America's fiber intake gap: Communication strategies from a food and fiber summit, found that most Americans actually do not get their RDA for fiber met. So, adding spinach and kale could be a great way to give your RDA fiber a start!
Vitamin K is necessary for blood clotting or lowering blood flow following an injury so that the wound can heal. In addition to calcium and vitamin D, it also supports healthy bones. While some animal products and fermented foods include vitamin K2, a 2020 study titled Vitamin K2 needs an RDI separate from vitamin K1, notes that lush greens like spinach and kale have vitamin K1.
The recommended daily intake of vitamin K is 120 microgrammes (mcg). A cup of raw kale has 82 microgrammes of vitamin K, while a cup of raw spinach contains 145 microgrammes.
It is a water-soluble vitamin and antioxidant that protect cells from damage and supports immune health. While it is often attributed to citrus fruits like oranges, vitamin C can also be found in leafy greens and both kale and spinach could be a great source. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommends around 80 milligram of daily vitamin C. In one cup of raw spinach, you can get 8.5 milligrams, while kale provides 20 milligrams of daily vitamin C.
As per the FDA, vitamin A is important not only for your immune system, but also for your eye health. One must have at least 3,000 international units daily. The Office of Dietary Supplements notes that spinach and kale contain compounds called carotenoids, which our bodies convert to a usable form of vitamin A. This way you can have these leafy greens in your diet to fulfill your requirement of vitamin A. In one cup of spinach, you can get 2,810 international units of vitamin A, whereas in one cup of kale, you will find 1,010 international units of vitamin A.
Leafy greens are a rich source of calcium, an important nutrient which supports healthy bones and teeth, nerve communication, and muscle movement. The RDA for calcium in adults is 1,300 milligrams and one cup of raw spinach contains 30 milligrams of calcium, whereas in kale, it has 53 milligrams.
It is a B vitamin which is best known for its important in pregnancy and that provides neural tube defects like spina bifida in fetuses. The RDA for folate is 400 micrograms in pregnant mothers and 600 for those who are lactating. In one cup of spinach, one can get 58.2 micrograms of folate, whereas kale contains 13 micrograms of folate.
Now that you know the nutrients that kale and spinach contain, you make your own decision. This could be decided based on your requirement. The best way to do this is by talking to a healthcare expert, or a nutritionist who can recommend you better based on your body's need.
Credits: iStock
The latest Annual Ground Water Quality Report 2025 by the Central Ground Water Board (CGWB) has delivered a worrying revelation: Punjab now records the highest intensity of uranium contamination ever reported in India, with 62.5% of groundwater samples exceeding the safe limit post-monsoon. This is followed by Haryana, Delhi, Karnataka and Uttar Pradesh, indicating a dangerous pattern across north and north-central India.
While nitrate and fluoride remain more widespread contaminants, uranium’s increasing presence raises an urgent public health concern because even low-dose, long-term exposure can quietly harm vital organs.
The CGWB tested 3,754 groundwater samples across India in pre- and post-monsoon seasons. The findings show a clear upward trend:
Nationally, uranium exceedance rose from 6.71% (pre-monsoon) to 7.91% (post-monsoon).
Haryana followed with 15–23.75% of samples above limits.
The report highlights northwestern India: Punjab, Haryana, Delhi, and parts of Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh — as the main hotspot, likely due to geogenic factors, aquifer depletion, and intense groundwater extraction. Meanwhile, eastern and southern states reported minimal contamination.
According to the 2025 study “Uranium’s hazardous effects on humans and recent developments in treatment,” the real threat from uranium lies in its chemical toxicity, not its radioactivity.
Uranium behaves like a heavy metal that gets absorbed and stored in the kidneys, impairing their ability to filter waste.
Even low-dose, chronic exposure through drinking water can gradually weaken renal functioning.
People who inhale uranium particles — especially workers in mining or processing — face:
Recent findings note that the gastrointestinal system is the main route of uranium entry. Once consumed through contaminated water, uranium moves from the stomach and intestines into soft tissues and organs.
Because uranium is a chemical analog of calcium, it can get deposited into bones. Over time, this raises the risk of bone cancer and may interfere with normal bone cell functioning.
Animal studies suggest:
Some studies hint at:
These areas remain under-studied but concerning.
The CGWB report warns that while most groundwater in India remains safe, the pockets of rising uranium contamination require immediate monitoring and mitigation. With millions relying on groundwater for daily consumption, even a small rise in toxic metals can translate into widespread health damage over time.
Long-term exposure rarely shows immediate symptoms, which makes the threat quiet but deeply harmful.
Credits: Canva
A new study suggests that drinking coffee could help certain individuals slow their biological ageing. Researchers found that consuming up to four cups a day may give some people a biological advantage, effectively making their cells appear five years younger than those who abstain. The study, published in BMJ Mental Health, focused on people with severe mental illnesses, including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and psychosis.
The scientists linked this effect to coffee’s high antioxidant content, which appears to protect and lengthen telomeres—the protective caps at the ends of chromosomes. Telomeres function like the plastic tips on shoelaces, preventing chromosomes from fraying. Normally, telomeres shorten naturally as we age, but in people with major psychiatric conditions, this process is often accelerated, contributing to premature cellular ageing.
According to News Medical, coffee’s antioxidants can reduce oxidative stress, a factor that speeds up telomere shortening and biological ageing. By consuming the optimal amount, individuals may slow this process, potentially gaining the equivalent of five years of cellular youth.
The study observed 436 adults, including 259 participants with schizophrenia and the remainder with affective disorders like bipolar disorder or major depressive disorder with psychotic features. Researchers analyzed participants’ coffee consumption and its impact on telomere length.
Results showed that drinking up to four cups daily was associated with longer telomeres. However, consuming more than five cups each day did not provide additional benefits; in fact, heavy coffee drinkers were biologically older compared to those consuming one or two cups. This highlights the importance of moderation, as excessive caffeine intake may lead to cellular stress and telomere shortening.
The study authors emphasized that while this research cannot definitively prove causation—because it was observational—coffee’s established health benefits make it a plausible contributor to preserving cellular health. As they noted: “Telomeres are highly sensitive to both oxidative stress and inflammation, further highlighting how coffee intake could help maintain cellular integrity in a population predisposed to accelerated ageing.”
Global health authorities generally recommend limiting caffeine intake to around 400 mg per day, roughly equivalent to four cups of coffee. Staying within this range seems to provide the protective effects without overloading the body.
The researchers also acknowledged some limitations in the study. They did not track other sources of caffeine participants may have consumed, nor did they account for the type of coffee or the time of day it was consumed, factors that could influence outcomes.
Overall, the study reinforces the idea that moderate coffee consumption can be a simple lifestyle choice with potential long-term benefits for mental health populations and, possibly, the general population as well.
Credits: Canva
Americans reach for coffee more often than any other drink, and studies continue to show that a couple of daily cups suit most people and may even support overall health. At the same time, nearly half of U.S. adults live with high blood pressure, defined as a systolic reading above 130 mmHg or a diastolic reading above 80 mmHg.
This raises a natural question. Does caffeine play a part in rising blood pressure levels? Is our strong preference for coffee adding to the problem, or could regular coffee intake possibly help keep blood pressure lower?
Many people enjoy coffee because it sharpens focus and lifts energy. That same stimulating action is also what can nudge blood pressure upward for a short while. John Higgins, MD, a cardiologist and professor of medicine at UTHealth Houston, agrees that this happens and notes that the general answer is yes. Moderate coffee use is usually acceptable for people whose blood pressure is stable or only slightly raised, though individuals react differently. While caffeine can push readings higher for a brief period, long-term drinking patterns tell another story.
Several studies report no added risk of hypertension among people who drink coffee often. A review of 13 cohort studies found no clear link between coffee intake and the development of high blood pressure. A separate 2023 review even noted that heavier coffee consumption was tied to a 7 percent lower risk of hypertension. The evidence suggests that people who drink coffee regularly tend to build tolerance to caffeine’s short-lived effect on blood pressure.
The 2025 AHA/ACC Hypertension Guideline does not list specific limits for coffee, and the American Heart Association states that moderate amounts appear fine for healthy adults.
There is no set rule, but research supports one to three cups a day for most people whose blood pressure is well controlled.
Remember that caffeine levels can vary quite a bit depending on the brewing method, and it is wise to think about your total caffeine intake, including tea, soft drinks, and energy drinks.
Keep the following points in mind when having coffee:
Drinking coffee is generally safe for those with steady or slightly raised blood pressure, and the greater concern usually lies with uncontrolled hypertension. Still, people who are sensitive to caffeine or have poorly managed blood pressure should be more careful.
Extra caution is advised if you have:
In these situations, consider limiting or avoiding caffeinated coffee until your readings improve. Keep in mind that coffee is only one part of overall blood pressure care. Do not overlook reducing sodium intake, staying active, managing weight, and following prescribed treatment.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited