Raw milk, long debated as healthier and nutritious than pasteurized milk by enthusiasts but strongly cautioned against by health practitioners, is now a hot topic in health and wellness circles with the increasing popularity of "natural" and "unprocessed" foods. The dangers surrounding raw milk have been brought to the forefront with the outbreak of H5N1 bird flu, highlighting the risk of contamination in raw milk supplies. All about raw milk, its risks, and the latest science.

What Is Raw Milk?

Raw milk is unpasteurized milk taken directly from cows, goats, or other similar animals. Unpasteurized milk does not go through the heat treatment process meant to destroy harmful pathogens and bacteria. Raw milk proponents say that pasteurization kills nutrients and enzymes. And that might be one false claim after another, as science continues to disprove it.

According to Dr. Meghan Davis of Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, pasteurization does not significantly alter the concentration of minerals or the quality of proteins in milk. In fact, it's a critical step to ensure food safety, particularly for animal-derived products prone to contamination.

Wellness influencers have in recent times advocated for raw milk as the "clean" and "natural" alternative to commercial milk distributed in stores, using claims from improved digestion to the stimulation of the immune system. However, these claims are not scientifically proven. Although raw milk contains antibodies, the amounts are too small to be worth anything for health.

Health Risks of Drinking Raw Milk

Raw milk consumption poses immense risks. It can become contaminated in two major ways:

1. Internal Contamination: Pathogens such as E. coli, Salmonella, and Campylobacter can seep into milk through infected animals.

2. External Contamination: Polluted water, dirt, manure, and contaminated equipment introduce harmful microorganisms.

The infections acquired from raw milk include diarrhea, stomach cramps, nausea, and fever, and severe effects can be experienced by infants, the elderly, pregnant women, and even immunocompromised people. Some other rare but serious diseases like hemolytic uremic syndrome, which may bring about renal failure or stroke, have also been associated with raw milk.

Bird Flu Impact on Raw Milk Safety

Raw milk has become a focal point of the latest bird flu outbreak as preliminary genetic analysis indicates the H5N1 virus, which causes avian flu, may have begun infecting cattle earlier than thought. And the CDC says viral particles have been found in raw milk, which adds one more risk to consuming unpasteurized dairy.

A notable case was with sick and dead cats on a Texas dairy farm that resulted from ingesting unpasteurized milk from infected cows. This presents how unpasteurized milk can be a vector for transmitting diseases.

Legal Status of Unpasteurized Milk

To reduce the risk, the FDA prohibited the interstate sale of unpasteurized milk in the United States. Different states, however, have their respective regulations on this matter:

- 20 states completely banned the sale of unpasteurized milk.

- 30 states allow raw milk sales under specified conditions.

Although these laws exist for protection of public health, many consumers are not even aware of the dangers associated with their consumption.

Why Pasteurization Is Important

Pasteurization destroys harmful bacteria without affecting the nutritional content of milk. Several studies in *Nutrition Today* report that pasteurization does not change the nutrient profile of milk. Pasteurized milk is free from pathogens and, therefore, also a safer alternative for all consumers, especially vulnerable ones.

Myths About Raw Milk Products

It's not just raw milk that's hazardous. Cheese, yogurt, and ice cream with unpasteurized milk carry the same dangers. To anyone tempted by the supposed health value of raw dairy, experts say in one voice: stick to pasteurized, and avoid illnesses like bird flu or salmonella infection.

Should You Drink Raw Milk?

Health organizations, including the FDA, CDC, and American Academy of Pediatrics, strongly advise against consuming raw milk. Beyond the personal health risks, drinking raw milk can also endanger others by increasing the spread of harmful bacteria and viruses.

The emergence of H5N1 in cattle and its link to raw milk calls the world to wake up to better preparedness. Like COVID-19, bird flu has demonstrated vulnerabilities in our food safety systems. The presence of avian flu in raw milk underscores the imperative for strict rules, public education, and investments in the prevention of these diseases.

Could this outbreak push governments and health organizations to step up surveillance and vaccination efforts against zoonotic diseases? The lessons learned from COVID-19 suggest a coordinated approach is essential to prevent future pandemics.

On the other hand, raw milk is far riskier and has far fewer benefits than its apparent healthy, "natural" choice. From bacterial contamination to the allowance of viruses like H5N1, there is evidence that is clear: pasteurization cannot be wished away. As we face new health challenges, it will be science over trends that safeguard public health.

Many people think that controlling blood sugar is just about avoiding sugary foods or cutting back on carbohydrates. Sure, what you eat is important but so is when you eat, especially if you have diabetes, prediabetes or insulin resistance.

Why Morning May Be A Better Time To Eat

Your body has an internal clock called the circadian rhythm. And, this impacts your sleep, digestion, hormone release and how your body metabolises energy. The stomach, intestine, liver, pancreas, muscles and fat tissue all work in coordination with this rhythm. In simple terms, the body is generally more prepared to digest and use food during the earlier part of the day.

Hormones also follow a daily pattern. Cortisol, for instance, is naturally more active in the morning, while growth hormone has greater activity at night and in the early hours of the day. Since the body is metabolically more active in the morning, it is often able to handle glucose and protein more efficiently at this time.

This is why having a balanced breakfast at a reasonable time, preferably before 9 am where possible, can be helpful for glycaemic control. It does not mean that breakfast has to be large or heavy. It means that the first meal of the day should be nutritious and should not be delayed unnecessarily.

Also read: Why Sustainable Weight Loss Requires More Than Cutting Calories?

How Skipping Breakfast Can Affect Blood Sugar

Eating early also prevents the long gap without food that can lead to tiredness, excessive hunger and overeating later in the day. By not eating breakfast, a person may be starving by lunchtime and may eat larger portions or foods high in refined carbohydrates. It can cause larger fluctuations in blood sugar.

Those with diabetes who are on insulin or other glucose-lowering medications in particular should eat regular meals. Skipping or delaying food can sometimes lead to hypoglycaemia, or low blood sugar. So, this may cause sweating, shakiness, dizziness, weakness or sudden hunger. In response, a person may overeat, which can then lead to a sharp rise in blood sugar and make overall control more difficult.

Also read: Study Links Lower Protein Intake To Healthy Ageing; Expert Explains Who Should & Shouldn't Cut Back

Should Dinner Be Your Lightest Meal?

The old saying, “Eat breakfast like a king, lunch like a prince and dinner like a pauper,” still has relevance. It does not mean overeating at breakfast. Rather, it reminds us not to make dinner the heaviest meal of the day, especially when it is eaten late.

A good breakfast can include protein, fibre and a moderate amount of carbohydrates. Eggs, curd, paneer, dal, sprouts, vegetables, nuts and whole grains are practical options. Timely eating, along with balanced meals, regular activity, prescribed medicines and medical follow up, can go a long way in improving blood sugar control.

The mukbangs, it a giant burrito in 5 bites, rock–paper–scissors “run and eat” challenge may look like harmless fun on Instagram, but medically, it’s a messy combination of speed, adrenaline and food. Your body simply isn’t built to sprint one second and swallow food the next, and that’s exactly why doctors are raising alarms.

When Running And Eating Collide

When you suddenly take off running, your system shifts into “performance mode.” Blood flow is pushed toward your muscles, your breathing gets heavier, and your heart rate shoots up. In that state, the body is not prioritising digestion, it’s prioritising oxygen and movement. If you try to eat immediately afterwards, your swallowing reflex is out of sync, your breathing is irregular, and your diaphragm is still working overtime. That makes choking far more likely than people realise, even with small bites.

What Happens To Your Digestion After Intense Exercise

Then there’s the digestive side. Eating right after a sprint forces the stomach to start working while the body is still in high-alert mode. This can lead to sudden acidity, cramps, indigestion, or even vomiting. Some people experience a sharp head rush or dizziness because the nervous system gets confused between “cool down” and “start digesting.” It’s a physiologically chaotic moment and food doesn’t belong in it.

Also read: Can Drinking Coffee Make You Leaner, Healthier? Study Decodes The Link

Another concern is behavioural. These challenges make speed-eating and chaotic eating patterns look entertaining. Young people often imitate trends without understanding the risks, and this normalises the idea that food is something to be shoved in quickly or eaten competitively. Over time, this can dull the body’s natural hunger and fullness cues.

The Social Media Trend May Be Fun, But Your Body Pays The Price

By Dr Chetan Kalal, DM Hepatologist and Liver Transplant Specialist, Saifee Hospital, Mumbai

Coffee is one of the world’s most widely consumed beverages and has been linked to various health benefits, including a lower risk of conditions such as type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. However, the biological mechanisms behind these benefits remain unclear.

Now, a Finnish study suggests that people who regularly drink coffee may have healthier body composition and metabolic markers.

The study, published in the European Journal of Nutrition, also found distinct associations between coffee consumption and sex hormones in men and women.

What Did The Study Find?

Researchers from the University of Oulu in Finland analyzed data from 2,264 participants, all aged 46, from the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966. They examined how coffee consumption was associated with circulating metabolites, cardiometabolic risk markers and sex hormones.

Coffee Linked To Leaner Body Profiles

Compared with people who drank less coffee, those who consumed more had:

• Lower total body fat
• Lower visceral fat
• Greater skeletal muscle mass

These biomarkers have previously been linked to insulin resistance and an increased risk of type 2 diabetes when chronically elevated.

Coffee And Sex Hormones

The strongest sex-specific associations were observed in men. Among men, higher coffee consumption was linked to:

• A more favorable glucose-insulin profile
• Higher concentrations of total and bioavailable testosterone
• Increased levels of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG)
• At the same time, free testosterone and the free androgen index were modestly lower.

What Could Explain The Link?

The researchers stated that hormonal pathways may partly explain the relationship between coffee consumption and metabolic health.

“What stood out in our findings was a distinct hormonal signature that didn't disappear even after we took into account BMI and lifestyle factors, with several of these associations differing between men and women,” said lead author Luca Verroest, a doctoral researcher at the University of Oulu.

More Research Is Needed

However, the findings do not prove that drinking coffee directly makes people leaner or healthier. The study was observational, meaning it identified associations between coffee consumption and metabolic measures rather than establishing cause and effect.

Further research is needed to determine whether coffee itself contributes to these differences in body composition and metabolic health.

How Much Coffee Is Good For You?

According to a recent scientific statement from the American Heart Association (AHA), published in the peer-reviewed journal Circulation, for most healthy adults, drinking up to five cups of black caffeinated coffee a day — providing up to 400 mg of caffeine — is considered safe and may even benefit heart health.

However, the statement noted that how coffee is brewed could make a difference, not just for its taste but also for cholesterol levels.

A review of the latest evidence on caffeine and cardiovascular health found that brewing methods matter because some types of coffee contain compounds that can raise LDL, or “bad,” cholesterol.

The review also found that drinking three to five 8-ounce cups of regular black coffee daily was associated with a lower risk of:

Heart disease

Stroke

Heart failure

Type 2 diabetes

Some abnormal heart rhythms.