Raw milk, long debated as healthier and nutritious than pasteurized milk by enthusiasts but strongly cautioned against by health practitioners, is now a hot topic in health and wellness circles with the increasing popularity of "natural" and "unprocessed" foods. The dangers surrounding raw milk have been brought to the forefront with the outbreak of H5N1 bird flu, highlighting the risk of contamination in raw milk supplies. All about raw milk, its risks, and the latest science.

What Is Raw Milk?

Raw milk is unpasteurized milk taken directly from cows, goats, or other similar animals. Unpasteurized milk does not go through the heat treatment process meant to destroy harmful pathogens and bacteria. Raw milk proponents say that pasteurization kills nutrients and enzymes. And that might be one false claim after another, as science continues to disprove it.

According to Dr. Meghan Davis of Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, pasteurization does not significantly alter the concentration of minerals or the quality of proteins in milk. In fact, it's a critical step to ensure food safety, particularly for animal-derived products prone to contamination.

Wellness influencers have in recent times advocated for raw milk as the "clean" and "natural" alternative to commercial milk distributed in stores, using claims from improved digestion to the stimulation of the immune system. However, these claims are not scientifically proven. Although raw milk contains antibodies, the amounts are too small to be worth anything for health.

Health Risks of Drinking Raw Milk

Raw milk consumption poses immense risks. It can become contaminated in two major ways:

1. Internal Contamination: Pathogens such as E. coli, Salmonella, and Campylobacter can seep into milk through infected animals.

2. External Contamination: Polluted water, dirt, manure, and contaminated equipment introduce harmful microorganisms.

The infections acquired from raw milk include diarrhea, stomach cramps, nausea, and fever, and severe effects can be experienced by infants, the elderly, pregnant women, and even immunocompromised people. Some other rare but serious diseases like hemolytic uremic syndrome, which may bring about renal failure or stroke, have also been associated with raw milk.

Bird Flu Impact on Raw Milk Safety

Raw milk has become a focal point of the latest bird flu outbreak as preliminary genetic analysis indicates the H5N1 virus, which causes avian flu, may have begun infecting cattle earlier than thought. And the CDC says viral particles have been found in raw milk, which adds one more risk to consuming unpasteurized dairy.

A notable case was with sick and dead cats on a Texas dairy farm that resulted from ingesting unpasteurized milk from infected cows. This presents how unpasteurized milk can be a vector for transmitting diseases.

Legal Status of Unpasteurized Milk

To reduce the risk, the FDA prohibited the interstate sale of unpasteurized milk in the United States. Different states, however, have their respective regulations on this matter:

- 20 states completely banned the sale of unpasteurized milk.

- 30 states allow raw milk sales under specified conditions.

Although these laws exist for protection of public health, many consumers are not even aware of the dangers associated with their consumption.

Why Pasteurization Is Important

Pasteurization destroys harmful bacteria without affecting the nutritional content of milk. Several studies in *Nutrition Today* report that pasteurization does not change the nutrient profile of milk. Pasteurized milk is free from pathogens and, therefore, also a safer alternative for all consumers, especially vulnerable ones.

Myths About Raw Milk Products

It's not just raw milk that's hazardous. Cheese, yogurt, and ice cream with unpasteurized milk carry the same dangers. To anyone tempted by the supposed health value of raw dairy, experts say in one voice: stick to pasteurized, and avoid illnesses like bird flu or salmonella infection.

Should You Drink Raw Milk?

Health organizations, including the FDA, CDC, and American Academy of Pediatrics, strongly advise against consuming raw milk. Beyond the personal health risks, drinking raw milk can also endanger others by increasing the spread of harmful bacteria and viruses.

The emergence of H5N1 in cattle and its link to raw milk calls the world to wake up to better preparedness. Like COVID-19, bird flu has demonstrated vulnerabilities in our food safety systems. The presence of avian flu in raw milk underscores the imperative for strict rules, public education, and investments in the prevention of these diseases.

Could this outbreak push governments and health organizations to step up surveillance and vaccination efforts against zoonotic diseases? The lessons learned from COVID-19 suggest a coordinated approach is essential to prevent future pandemics.

On the other hand, raw milk is far riskier and has far fewer benefits than its apparent healthy, "natural" choice. From bacterial contamination to the allowance of viruses like H5N1, there is evidence that is clear: pasteurization cannot be wished away. As we face new health challenges, it will be science over trends that safeguard public health.

An international team of 23 nutrition scientists has developed a food pyramid emphasizing plant foods, healthier fats and high-quality carbohydrates, offering an alternative to the Trump administration’s meat-heavy dietary advice.

Published in Advances in Nutrition, the International Food Guide Pyramid synthesizes evidence from more than 250 scientific publications and dietary guidelines from seven countries and regions.

“Despite what people often hear, there’s actually substantial agreement in nutrition science about the foundations of healthy eating,” said Karen Della Corte, a Brigham Young University nutritional scientist who led the team.

What Does The New Food Pyramid Recommend?

The pyramid focuses on three principles:

• Make plant foods the foundation of a healthy diet.

• Choose healthier sources of fat and protein.

• Prioritize carbohydrate quality.

It encourages plant-based proteins such as beans, lentils, nuts and soy, without excluding fish, poultry, eggs or dairy. The guide can also be adapted for vegetarian and vegan diets.

The EAT-Lancet Commission estimates that adopting its proposed plant-forward diet could prevent approximately 15 million premature deaths annually.

Why Carbohydrate Quality Matters

The guide prioritizes whole grains and other high-quality carbohydrates over refined grains and sugary drinks. Carbohydrate quality depends on fiber content, processing, food structure and glycemic index (GI), which measures how carbohydrate-containing foods affect blood glucose.

“For both health and sustainability reasons, carbohydrate-rich foods should provide a substantial share of our energy, so their quality is particularly important,” said Anette Buyken, a professor at Paderborn University in Germany.

Traditional staples such as basmati rice, durum pasta, tortillas, rice noodles and bulgur can fit into a healthy diet, Della Corte said, depending on their glycemic index and preparation.

Plant Proteins And Healthier Fats Take Priority

The pyramid also recommends choosing beans, peas, lentils, fish, poultry or yogurt more often than red and processed meats. It also advises replacing saturated fats, such as butter and animal fats, with unsaturated fats from sources such as olive and canola oils.

Other suggestions include choosing nuts, seeds, fruit or vegetables with hummus instead of processed snacks, whole-grain bread over refined white bread, and water instead of sugary soda.

How Does It Differ From Trump’s Dietary Advice?

The international pyramid contrasts with the Trump administration’s updated US dietary guidance, shaped by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s “Make America Healthy Again” (MAHA) agenda, which has emphasized meat and other animal-based foods.

Rather than prioritizing red meat, the international guide stresses plant proteins, unsaturated oils and higher-quality carbohydrates. It also considers the environmental impact of food production, including greenhouse gas emissions associated with livestock farming.

“Our diet has to be not only for our own health but also for the health of our planet,” said David Jenkins, a University of Toronto professor and creator of the glycemic index.

The guide also highlights the importance of limiting added sugars, particularly from sugary drinks, and favors water or sugar-free alternatives.

Can The Pyramid Work Across Cultures?

Working with the International Carbohydrate Quality Consortium, Della Corte compared dietary guidelines from Canada, Germany, Australia, China, the Netherlands, the United States and the Nordic countries. She also reviewed more than 250 scientific publications and drew on the EAT-Lancet Planetary Health Diet to identify shared principles of healthy eating.

The researchers say healthy eating does not require everyone to follow the same menu. Recommendations can be adapted to local food traditions, availability and budgets.

“When you’re designing a meal, start by thinking about the plant foods you want to emphasize,” Della Corte said. “What vegetables, whole or lower-GI grains, beans or lentils could you include?”

However, affordability and access can make healthier choices difficult.

“We need food environments that make it easy to put the pyramid’s recommendations into practice,” Buyken said, calling for nutrition policies that address food marketing, access and prices.

Children who consume more ultra-processed foods may show stronger brain responses that could make them crave those foods repeatedly. This helps explain the link between these foods and childhood weight gain, according to a new study.

The research, published in JAMA Network Open, found that kids who ate more ultra-processed foods had greater activity in a brain region that is involved in reward and motivation when they saw tempting pictures of appetising foods. That brain activity was also associated with increase in body fat over the following year.

The findings raise important questions about how eating highly processed foods frequently may affect a developing brain.

UPFs May Influence A Developing Brain

Also read: Six To Eight Cups Of Tea A Day Linked To Lower Heart Disease Risk: But Should You Drink More?

The study included 46 children aged 7 to 10 who had a healthy weight at the beginning of the research. Scientists collected data about their diets and used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine brain activity while the children viewed pictures of appetising foods, including cookies and French fries.

The researchers focused on the striatum, a brain region involved in learning, motivation and reward anticipation.

Children who consumed more ultra-processed foods showed stronger responses in the dorsal striatum when viewing food images. Greater activity in this region was also linked with an increase in body mass index (BMI) and body fat percentage one year later.

The researchers found that accounting for differences in brain responses weakened the association between ultra-processed food intake and subsequent increases in BMI by 31% and body fat percentage by 44%. This suggests that brain activity related to reward may help explain part of the relationship.

Senior study author Dr Kathleen A. Page, a professor of medicine and pediatrics at the Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, said, “This study goes beyond just understanding that UPFs affect weight gain. It actually gives us insight into the neurobiological underpinnings by which these foods may be linked to body composition over time.”

Importance Of Childhood Nutrition

Also read: Peanut Consumption Associated With Lower Type 2 Diabetes Risk: Study Explains

Ultra-processed foods include many packaged snacks, sugary cereals, sweetened drinks, instant meals and other similar products. They are often designed to be convenient, appealing, and have a long shelf life.

The researchers say childhood is an important period for understanding how food habits influence eating patterns and long-term health.

“Children’s brains are still developing, habits are still forming and food preferences are still being made. It’s an important period where the brain is very sensitive to food and the food environment,” Page said.

The research had key limitations. It involved only 46 children, assessed brain activity at a single time point and followed changes in body composition for one year. The observational design means researchers cannot determine whether greater ultra-processed food consumption caused the brain responses or whether other factors contributed to both.

Message For Parents

The findings point to existing concerns about children's diets high in ultra-processed foods. Page emphasised the importance of making healthier options more accessible.

“Changing the food environment to help people access healthier, more minimally processed foods is an important part of the solution,” she said.

Families can offer more fruits, vegetables, whole grains, pulses and other minimally processed foods while limiting consumption of sugary drinks and packaged snacks.

Whey protein is one of the most heavily marketed supplements in the fitness world, but the actual science behind it is more modest than the gym lore suggests.

Muscle is constantly being broken down and rebuilt, and the balance between those two processes over weeks and months determines whether you gain or lose muscle.

Resistance training raises the rate of muscle rebuilding, called muscle protein synthesis, and eating protein raises it further. Whey, the liquid left over when milk becomes cheese, digests quickly and is naturally high in leucine, an amino acid that appears to help trigger that rebuilding process. In short-term lab studies, this gives whey a sharper spike in synthesis compared with slower-digesting proteins like casein.

A short-term spike doesn’t automatically mean more muscle over months, though. What actually matters for long-term gains is a different question: how much total protein someone eats in a day.

How Much Protein Do We Actually Need?

A widely cited 2018 meta-analysis in the British Journal of Sports Medicine, led by Robert Morton and colleagues at McMaster University, looked at this directly. Pooling 49 resistance training trials with 1,863 participants, the researchers found that protein supplementation significantly increased gains in strength, muscle mass, and muscle fibre size compared with resistance training alone.

The benefits levelled off once total daily protein intake reached roughly 1.62 grams per kilogram of body weight, the study found. Past that point, extra protein, from whey or any other source, mostly just becomes calories. For an 80-kilogram (176-pound) person, that threshold works out to about 130 grams of protein a day.

Also Read: Is Lemon Water Really Helpful for Preventing Kidney Stones?

Right Time To Consume Protein

The idea of a 30-minute “anabolic window” after a workout has largely fallen out of favour in the research. When studies control for how much protein people ate in total, tight timing around workouts shows little added benefit.

Total daily intake is what predicts outcomes, not whether a shake was consumed within a specific window after training. Spreading protein across three or four meals a day is a reasonable habit, but missing a post-workout shake by an hour or two makes little practical difference.

Where Whey Actually Fits

If someone’s diet already supplies enough protein from food, around that 1.6 g/kg mark, a shake adds little extra benefit. Whey becomes useful mainly as a convenient way to close a gap when a person’s diet otherwise falls short, particularly because of its speed, high leucine content, and long shelf life compared with whole-food protein sources like chicken, eggs, or fish.

A few groups should be cautious. People with kidney disease should talk to a doctor before raising protein intake, and whey, as a dairy product, isn’t suitable for anyone with a milk allergy. People with lactose intolerance may tolerate whey isolate, which has less lactose than concentrate, but should check with a clinician if unsure.

Whey builds muscle the same way other high-quality proteins do: by helping people hit a sufficient total daily protein target alongside resistance training. It isn’t a shortcut or a requirement, just one convenient tool among several for reaching the same number. Training remains the main driver of muscle growth. Protein, whey included, is what supports it.