Is Raw Milk Worth The Risk? Truth About Raw Milk And Its Potential For Contamination
Raw milk, long debated as healthier and nutritious than pasteurized milk by enthusiasts but strongly cautioned against by health practitioners, is now a hot topic in health and wellness circles with the increasing popularity of "natural" and "unprocessed" foods. The dangers surrounding raw milk have been brought to the forefront with the outbreak of H5N1 bird flu, highlighting the risk of contamination in raw milk supplies. All about raw milk, its risks, and the latest science.
Raw milk is unpasteurized milk taken directly from cows, goats, or other similar animals. Unpasteurized milk does not go through the heat treatment process meant to destroy harmful pathogens and bacteria. Raw milk proponents say that pasteurization kills nutrients and enzymes. And that might be one false claim after another, as science continues to disprove it.
According to Dr. Meghan Davis of Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, pasteurization does not significantly alter the concentration of minerals or the quality of proteins in milk. In fact, it's a critical step to ensure food safety, particularly for animal-derived products prone to contamination.
Wellness influencers have in recent times advocated for raw milk as the "clean" and "natural" alternative to commercial milk distributed in stores, using claims from improved digestion to the stimulation of the immune system. However, these claims are not scientifically proven. Although raw milk contains antibodies, the amounts are too small to be worth anything for health.
Raw milk consumption poses immense risks. It can become contaminated in two major ways:
1. Internal Contamination: Pathogens such as E. coli, Salmonella, and Campylobacter can seep into milk through infected animals.
2. External Contamination: Polluted water, dirt, manure, and contaminated equipment introduce harmful microorganisms.
The infections acquired from raw milk include diarrhea, stomach cramps, nausea, and fever, and severe effects can be experienced by infants, the elderly, pregnant women, and even immunocompromised people. Some other rare but serious diseases like hemolytic uremic syndrome, which may bring about renal failure or stroke, have also been associated with raw milk.
Raw milk has become a focal point of the latest bird flu outbreak as preliminary genetic analysis indicates the H5N1 virus, which causes avian flu, may have begun infecting cattle earlier than thought. And the CDC says viral particles have been found in raw milk, which adds one more risk to consuming unpasteurized dairy.
A notable case was with sick and dead cats on a Texas dairy farm that resulted from ingesting unpasteurized milk from infected cows. This presents how unpasteurized milk can be a vector for transmitting diseases.
To reduce the risk, the FDA prohibited the interstate sale of unpasteurized milk in the United States. Different states, however, have their respective regulations on this matter:
- 20 states completely banned the sale of unpasteurized milk.
- 30 states allow raw milk sales under specified conditions.
Although these laws exist for protection of public health, many consumers are not even aware of the dangers associated with their consumption.
Pasteurization destroys harmful bacteria without affecting the nutritional content of milk. Several studies in *Nutrition Today* report that pasteurization does not change the nutrient profile of milk. Pasteurized milk is free from pathogens and, therefore, also a safer alternative for all consumers, especially vulnerable ones.
It's not just raw milk that's hazardous. Cheese, yogurt, and ice cream with unpasteurized milk carry the same dangers. To anyone tempted by the supposed health value of raw dairy, experts say in one voice: stick to pasteurized, and avoid illnesses like bird flu or salmonella infection.
Health organizations, including the FDA, CDC, and American Academy of Pediatrics, strongly advise against consuming raw milk. Beyond the personal health risks, drinking raw milk can also endanger others by increasing the spread of harmful bacteria and viruses.
The emergence of H5N1 in cattle and its link to raw milk calls the world to wake up to better preparedness. Like COVID-19, bird flu has demonstrated vulnerabilities in our food safety systems. The presence of avian flu in raw milk underscores the imperative for strict rules, public education, and investments in the prevention of these diseases.
Could this outbreak push governments and health organizations to step up surveillance and vaccination efforts against zoonotic diseases? The lessons learned from COVID-19 suggest a coordinated approach is essential to prevent future pandemics.
On the other hand, raw milk is far riskier and has far fewer benefits than its apparent healthy, "natural" choice. From bacterial contamination to the allowance of viruses like H5N1, there is evidence that is clear: pasteurization cannot be wished away. As we face new health challenges, it will be science over trends that safeguard public health.
(Credit - Canva)
It turns out that a "boring" bowl of oatmeal might be a secret weapon for heart health. A recent study from the University of Bonn, published in Nature Communications, suggests that eating a diet focused almost entirely on oatmeal for just 48 hours can significantly lower cholesterol.
The study looked at people with metabolic syndrome, a group of health issues like high blood pressure, high blood sugar, and extra body weight that increase the risk of heart disease and diabetes.
Using oats as medicine isn't actually a new idea. Back in the early 1900s, a German doctor named Carl von Noorden used "oat cures" to help people with diabetes. While modern medications eventually took center stage, researchers wanted to see if this old-school method still held value for preventing disease today.
To test the theory, 32 men and women followed a strict plan for two days. Here is how it worked:
A second "control group" also cut their calories by half but didn't eat oats. While both groups saw some health improvements from eating less, the oatmeal group saw much better results. Not only did their LDL drop by 10%, but they also lost about 2 kilos on average. The study notes that that they also showed a slight improvement.
Even more surprising? The lower cholesterol levels were still visible six weeks later, suggesting that a short "oat reboot" every month or so could have lasting benefits.
Proteins carry cholesterol through your blood as "lipoproteins." HDL is "good" because it clears extra cholesterol by sending it to your liver for removal. Non-HDL (mostly LDL) is "bad" because it delivers cholesterol to your body; too much causes fatty buildup in your arteries, which blocks blood flow and significantly increases your risk of heart attacks or strokes.
Lowering high cholesterol is vital because it directly protects your heart and brain. When "bad" cholesterol levels are too high, sticky deposits called plaques narrow your arteries
The researchers believe the answer lies in our gut microbiome (the bacteria living in our digestive system).
When we eat oats, certain "good" bacteria thrive. These microbes break down the oats into substances like ferulic acid, which travels into the bloodstream and helps the body process cholesterol more effectively.
These bacteria also help prevent the body from creating compounds that lead to insulin resistance, a major cause of diabetes.
The study also found that "a little bit" of oatmeal might not be enough for a major impact. In a separate part of the study, people ate 80 grams of oatmeal a day for six weeks without changing the rest of their diet. This approach only led to small changes.
It seems the combination of high oat intake and temporary calorie restriction is the "magic formula" that triggers the most significant health improvements.
Credits: FSSAI and Canva
Ahead of Holi and Eid, and during Ramadan, when demand of cooking oil spikes for meal preparation, every year, substandard quality items hit the market. This year too this happened and to curb this practice, the Uttar Pradesh Food Safety and Drug Administration (UPFSDA) issued 37 notices for non compliance to sellers selling substandard oil. The Food Safety Department also seized oil worth Rs. 6.43 crore.
The UPFSDA inspected 64 manufacturing units across Uttar Pradesh and seized 4,16,494 litres of suspicious edible oil.
Substandard cooking oil refers to edible oils that are adulterated, improperly refined, reused, or of low quality, often containing harmful compounds due to poor manufacturing, such as high-heat processing or chemical contamination. FSSAI reports have indicated that up to 30.7% of edible oils in some markets are of poor quality or adulterated.
As per a 2024 study published in the International Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, common oil sources shows that most edible oils are extracted from seeds, while certain fruits such as olives, coconuts, and palm fruits are also used to produce oil. However, adulteration remains a major concern. Oils like Argemone oil, mineral oil, castor oil, karanja oil, olive oil, cottonseed oil, and paraffin oil are often blended with edible oils and ghee. Some adulterated products may even contain toxic substances such as cyanide and banned colouring agents.
Mustard oil and soybean oil are particularly vulnerable to adulteration through the deliberate addition of substances such as cyanide, mineral oil, karanja oil, Argemone oil, and linseed oil—practices that pose serious risks to consumer health and safety. Similarly, sesame oil is frequently mixed with other oils including avocado, olive, canola, walnut, peanut, and perilla oils.
Argemone oil, in particular, is derived from the seeds of the Argemone mexicana plant and is commonly mixed with mustard oil. Its seeds are spherical, blackish-brown, and have a net-like surface, closely resembling mustard seeds, which makes detection more difficult.
Adulteration, in general, makes edible oils and ghee unsafe for consumption and significantly reduces their nutritional value. According to the Indian Council of Medical Research, many adulterants can cause permanent organ damage. History offers stark warnings: in Spain, the sale of non-edible rapeseed oil falsely marketed as olive oil led to more than 600 deaths in what became known as the Spanish toxic oil syndrome.
Argemone-contaminated oils have triggered major outbreaks in several countries, including a severe epidemic dropsy crisis in New Delhi in 1998. Reported symptoms included retinal haemorrhages, anaemia, kidney dysfunction, and severe protein deficiency. Some adulterated oils may also contain carcinogenic substances such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), increasing long-term cancer risk.
Other adulterants pose additional dangers. Castor oil contamination can cause severe gastrointestinal distress. Mineral oil adulteration is linked to liver toxicity and cancer risk. Cottonseed oil, when improperly blended, increases exposure to high levels of polyunsaturated fats, potentially contributing to obesity, diabetes, and other lifestyle-related diseases. In some alarming cases, soybean and mustard oils have been found adulterated with burnt mobil oil containing polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), toxic chemicals associated with liver damage, neurological changes, dehydration, respiratory irritation, and systemic organ harm.
Adulteration can also trigger allergic reactions. If peanut oil is used as an undeclared adulterant, it may cause severe allergic responses in susceptible individuals.
The most concerning aspect is that loose or unpackaged edible oils are more prone to contamination and adulteration. What may appear to be a simple cost-cutting practice can, in reality, expose consumers to life-threatening toxins, chronic disease risks, and irreversible organ damage.
(Credit : Pinterest)
In a world where stress, anxiety and declining mental well-being are becoming increasingly common, many people are looking for simple lifestyle habits that can promote positive mood and psychological resilience.
New research suggests that eating around three servings of flavonoid-rich foods everyday, especially fruits such as blueberries, strawberries, apples and citrus fruits, may be linked with higher levels of happiness and optimism over time.
A large-scale observational study utilized data from the US Nurses Health Study 2026, one of the largest and longest running health studies focused on women. Scientists at Queens University Belfast and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health analyzed the eating habits and mental health of tens of thousands of women aged 60 and over for a period of up to 18 years.
Participants who consumed about three servings per day of flavonoid-rich foods were found to be three percent more likely to maintain sustained happiness over time and about six percent more likely to maintain long-term optimism
According to the authors, greater consumption of particular fruits such as blueberries and strawberries in some instances correlated with an 8-16 percent higher probability of being psychologically well over time.
Although the percentage increments may seem minor, the team of researchers point out that tiny effects at the population level can have a significant impact, particularly when the observation period is as long as almost twenty years.
The results were additionally featured in a press release of the International Blueberry Organization, which stressed the public health impact of regularly eating flavonoid-rich fruits.
1. Reduced Inflammation: Chronic low-grade inflammation has been associated with depressive symptoms. Flavonoids may help dampen inflammatory pathways in the body.
2. Antioxidant Protection: One of the most dangerous byproducts of metabolism is oxidative stress and the damage it causes to our cells, including neurons involved in emotional regulation. Flavonoids are effective in the neutralization of free radicals.
3. Improved Vascular Function: Better blood vessel function may enhance cerebral blood flow, supporting optimal brain performance.
Surprisingly, the researchers also retained that an individual with higher levels of optimism was more likely to maintain healthy diets over time, hence, the possibility of a "virtuous cycle" mood and nutrition may reinforce one another.
While research keeps delving into the complex connection between diet and mental health, the takeaway message that emerges is: our diet not only supplies energy to our bodies but it also influences the quality of our mood and outlook on life.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited