Raw milk, long debated as healthier and nutritious than pasteurized milk by enthusiasts but strongly cautioned against by health practitioners, is now a hot topic in health and wellness circles with the increasing popularity of "natural" and "unprocessed" foods. The dangers surrounding raw milk have been brought to the forefront with the outbreak of H5N1 bird flu, highlighting the risk of contamination in raw milk supplies. All about raw milk, its risks, and the latest science.

What Is Raw Milk?

Raw milk is unpasteurized milk taken directly from cows, goats, or other similar animals. Unpasteurized milk does not go through the heat treatment process meant to destroy harmful pathogens and bacteria. Raw milk proponents say that pasteurization kills nutrients and enzymes. And that might be one false claim after another, as science continues to disprove it.

According to Dr. Meghan Davis of Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, pasteurization does not significantly alter the concentration of minerals or the quality of proteins in milk. In fact, it's a critical step to ensure food safety, particularly for animal-derived products prone to contamination.

Wellness influencers have in recent times advocated for raw milk as the "clean" and "natural" alternative to commercial milk distributed in stores, using claims from improved digestion to the stimulation of the immune system. However, these claims are not scientifically proven. Although raw milk contains antibodies, the amounts are too small to be worth anything for health.

Health Risks of Drinking Raw Milk

Raw milk consumption poses immense risks. It can become contaminated in two major ways:

1. Internal Contamination: Pathogens such as E. coli, Salmonella, and Campylobacter can seep into milk through infected animals.

2. External Contamination: Polluted water, dirt, manure, and contaminated equipment introduce harmful microorganisms.

The infections acquired from raw milk include diarrhea, stomach cramps, nausea, and fever, and severe effects can be experienced by infants, the elderly, pregnant women, and even immunocompromised people. Some other rare but serious diseases like hemolytic uremic syndrome, which may bring about renal failure or stroke, have also been associated with raw milk.

Bird Flu Impact on Raw Milk Safety

Raw milk has become a focal point of the latest bird flu outbreak as preliminary genetic analysis indicates the H5N1 virus, which causes avian flu, may have begun infecting cattle earlier than thought. And the CDC says viral particles have been found in raw milk, which adds one more risk to consuming unpasteurized dairy.

A notable case was with sick and dead cats on a Texas dairy farm that resulted from ingesting unpasteurized milk from infected cows. This presents how unpasteurized milk can be a vector for transmitting diseases.

Legal Status of Unpasteurized Milk

To reduce the risk, the FDA prohibited the interstate sale of unpasteurized milk in the United States. Different states, however, have their respective regulations on this matter:

- 20 states completely banned the sale of unpasteurized milk.

- 30 states allow raw milk sales under specified conditions.

Although these laws exist for protection of public health, many consumers are not even aware of the dangers associated with their consumption.

Why Pasteurization Is Important

Pasteurization destroys harmful bacteria without affecting the nutritional content of milk. Several studies in *Nutrition Today* report that pasteurization does not change the nutrient profile of milk. Pasteurized milk is free from pathogens and, therefore, also a safer alternative for all consumers, especially vulnerable ones.

Myths About Raw Milk Products

It's not just raw milk that's hazardous. Cheese, yogurt, and ice cream with unpasteurized milk carry the same dangers. To anyone tempted by the supposed health value of raw dairy, experts say in one voice: stick to pasteurized, and avoid illnesses like bird flu or salmonella infection.

Should You Drink Raw Milk?

Health organizations, including the FDA, CDC, and American Academy of Pediatrics, strongly advise against consuming raw milk. Beyond the personal health risks, drinking raw milk can also endanger others by increasing the spread of harmful bacteria and viruses.

The emergence of H5N1 in cattle and its link to raw milk calls the world to wake up to better preparedness. Like COVID-19, bird flu has demonstrated vulnerabilities in our food safety systems. The presence of avian flu in raw milk underscores the imperative for strict rules, public education, and investments in the prevention of these diseases.

Could this outbreak push governments and health organizations to step up surveillance and vaccination efforts against zoonotic diseases? The lessons learned from COVID-19 suggest a coordinated approach is essential to prevent future pandemics.

On the other hand, raw milk is far riskier and has far fewer benefits than its apparent healthy, "natural" choice. From bacterial contamination to the allowance of viruses like H5N1, there is evidence that is clear: pasteurization cannot be wished away. As we face new health challenges, it will be science over trends that safeguard public health.

An 84-day clinical trial has found that a high-fibre diet improved blood sugar control and reduced body weight more effectively than metformin, the standard first-line diabetes drug, in adults newly diagnosed with both type 2 diabetes and obesity.

Researchers led by Li Y and colleagues enrolled adults aged 18 to 70 with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes and obesity, according to the study published in Frontiers in Microbiology.

Participants were randomly assigned to either a high-fibre dietary intervention, using two standardised fibre formulations plus dietary guidance, or metformin monotherapy, given according to routine clinical practice. Neither group combined the two approaches.

Researchers tracked diet through food frequency questionnaires and 24-hour dietary recalls, and measured outcomes including HbA1c, BMI, fasting blood glucose, and glucose responses during meal tolerance tests.

Fibre beat the drug on blood sugar and weight

By the end of the trial, the high-fibre group had significantly lower HbA1c and BMI than the metformin group, per the study. Continuous glucose monitoring showed the fibre group had more stable blood sugar overall, with lower average glucose levels and less variability throughout the day.

The fibre group also came out ahead on body composition: lower waist-to-hip ratios, lower leg, trunk and total body fat mass, and lower triglyceride levels compared with the metformin group, the researchers reported.

Also Read: 94% Of TB Patients Report Anxiety, 77% Depression: Study Highlights Mental Health Toll Of India's TB Burden

How the gut bacteria changed

The high-fibre diet reshaped participants’ gut microbiota in ways metformin didn’t. By day 28, the diet had enriched bacteria from the Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus genera, both generally considered beneficial, while reducing Bilophila wadsworthia, a bacterium linked to gut inflammation, according to the study. Metformin, by contrast, produced little detectable change in gut bacteria.

Several bacterial species associated with fermenting carbohydrates increased specifically in the fibre group. Participants whose acetate levels, a byproduct of that fermentation, rose the most also saw significantly greater drops in HbA1c at both day 28 and day 56, and these participants tended to have distinct gut microbiome profiles at the start of the trial.

Why fibre may work this way

The likely mechanism involves short-chain fatty acids like acetate, produced when gut bacteria ferment fibre. These compounds are thought to boost secretion of GLP-1, the same gut hormone that newer diabetes drugs like semaglutide are designed to mimic, which in turn improves insulin sensitivity and promotes fullness, according to a separate summary of the research by News-Medical.

This isn’t an isolated finding. A separate, smaller crossover trial of 34 newly diagnosed patients, published in a different study, similarly found that early high-fibre nutrition therapy produced rapid improvements in glycaemic control alongside reshaping of the gut microbiome, reinforcing the idea that timing and gut-level changes both matter.

The study’s authors concluded that a high-fibre dietary intervention could be a promising strategy for managing newly diagnosed diabesity, outperforming metformin alone on both blood sugar and weight-related outcomes. They noted that larger trials with longer follow-up are needed to confirm how durable these benefits are and to better understand the exact microbiome mechanisms involved.

Festivals bring family and friends together and all enjoy traditional sweets and savouries to rich gravies and deep-fried delicacies. However, the joy of celebration and eating more than regular can sometimes lead to bloating, acidity, heaviness, gas and discomfort. Understanding how digestion works and how Ayurveda explains it through the concept of Agni can help us celebrate with smoothness in our digestive system.

During festival, we may eat larger portions, enjoy several rich dishes at one meal, or eat again before we feel actual hunger. Digestive discomfort often occurs when we eat food without knowing agni, consume fatty or fried foods, eat too quickly or combine multiple rich dishes in one meal, untimely, without proper digestion of previous meal. For some people, carbonated drinks and particular food can increase gas or bloating. Stomach stretches when we overeat, and high-fat and heavy meals may delay stomach emptying, leaving us feeling uncomfortably full for longer period. Eating rapidly can also cause us to swallow more air. For people prone to acid reflux, large meals may get worsen with heartburn and regurgitation. Occasional bloating after a heavy meal is common.

Ayurveda explain digesting and metabolism through concept of Agni. The concept of Jatharagni relates particularly to the digestion and metabolism of food. Ayurveda also describes Mandagni (diminished digestive capacity) which will be associated with symptoms such as heaviness, reduced appetite and sluggish digestion etc..., from a practical perspective, the Ayurveda emphasis on eating according to digestive capacity, avoiding excessive food intake and maintaining regular dietary habits aligns sensibly with modern nutrition advice. Classical ayurvedic text emphasise the importance of maintaining balance Agni, for overall health, well-being and preventive care; however, Agni is a traditional Ayurvedic concept and should not be directly corelated with any single modern physiological process.

Also read: We Fact Checked The Ayurveda Claim Of Papaya Lowering Your Cholesterol, Details Inside

Five Healthy Eating Habits For Festive Season

1. Portion awareness: Enjoy your favourite dishes of festival but begin with moderate portions. Eat in moderate speed and pause before taking a second serving.

2. Avoid excessive food in one sitting: Multiple preparations which are fried and sugary can make a meal unnecessarily heavy. Choose a balanced plate with vegetables, protein-rich foods and appropriate portions of carbohydrates and Fats.

3. Hydration: Drink warm water regularly throughout the day sip by sip. Limit excessive carbonated beverages if they are causing any discomfort or not.

4. Digestion time: Avoid lying down immediately after meals. A gentle 10–15-minute slow walk after eating may support general digestive comfort, then if needed lie-down on left sided.

5. Routine and mindful eating: Avoid skipping meals to compensate for feasting. Eat when comfortably hungry after analysing agni, pay attention to fullness and maintain regular sleep, physical and mindfulness activities.

Festive eating need not mean deprivation or discomfort. Ayurveda's emphasis on Agni encourages us to respect individual digestive capacity, and guidance from nutrition reinforces moderation, mindful eating and balanced meals. Enjoy the foods you love, savour every bite, observe and recognise when you are comfortably full of stomach.

Seek medical evaluation if bloating is persistent, frequently recurring or accompanied by severe abdominal pain, repeated vomiting, diarrhea, blood in the stool, unexplained weight loss, difficulty swallowing or any GI related symptoms. Severe or sudden abdominal pain requires urgent medical attention and assessment.

This festive season, let celebration nourish your well-being not leave you feeling weighed down.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice.

According to Indian food regulations, there is a specified amount of pesticide residue that can legally remain in tea leaves. But the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has proposed new limits for two types of pesticides used in agriculture, including a limit for one that is lower than those in the United States and Japan.

The draft amendment, announced by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare on October 17, 2026, proposes maximum residue limits (MRLs) for acetamiprid and imidacloprid in tea. The move is aimed to give tea farmers, manufacturers and regulators clearer standards to follow.

Under the proposal, the maximum permitted residue of acetamiprid in tea would be 20 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), or 20 parts per million (ppm). For imidacloprid, the proposed limit is 50 mg/kg.

The draft regulations were published in the Gazette of India on October 16 and are yet to be finalised. These are proposed legal limits, not measurements showing how much pesticide is present in tea sold in India.

India's Proposed Limits For Pesticide Residue In Tea

India has proposed a limit of 20 ppm for acetamiprid, which is lower than the corresponding limit of 30 ppm in Japan and 50 ppm in the United States. For imidacloprid, the proposed Indian limit has been formulated with reference to international Codex standards.

These figures do not mean that tea sold in the US or Japan necessarily contains more pesticide residue. Maximum residue limits specify the highest concentration legally permitted in a food product. Actual residue levels depend on pesticide use, farming practices, and testing results.

A higher legal limit also does not automatically mean that a food product is unsafe. Risk assessment requires additional information about the pesticide, the amount consumed, the level of exposure and its toxicological profile.

The proposed tea standards are part of FSSAI's review of pesticide residue regulations. The government said an earlier regulatory measure aimed at delisting 13 pesticides that were known to have higher toxicity.

The regulator also highlighted India's comparatively low average pesticide use, at less than 0.5 kg per hectare, against an estimated global average of 2.38 kg per hectare.

Also read: Your Protein Powder May Be Toxic! A New Study Reveals High Levels Of Lead And Cadmium

What Are Acetamiprid And Imidacloprid?

Acetamiprid and imidacloprid belong to a class of insecticides called neonicotinoids. They are used to control agricultural pests. Although they help protect crops, their safety depends on how they are used, the residues left behind and the amount people are exposed to.

Acetamiprid acts on the nervous system of insects. Toxicological research has raised concerns about its potential effects on the nervous system and reproductive development at sufficiently high exposure levels.

Imidacloprid also works the same way and its excessive exposure can cause toxic effects, including neurological symptoms.

The health risks stem from long-term, low-level exposure that depend on the dose, way of exposure and duration. The proposed residue limit alone cannot establish whether a particular tea product poses a health risk.

Also read: Blueberries To Green Beans: Fruits & Vegetables With Maximum Pesticide Content

Health Risks Of Pesticide Residues In Tea

The health risks associated with pesticide residues depend on the chemical involved and how much enters the body. High exposure to certain insecticides can affect the nervous system, while toxicological studies have also investigated possible effects on reproduction.

For consumers, the key question is whether pesticide exposure through food remains within levels considered acceptable under established safety assessments.

Maximum residue limits are designed to help regulate pesticide use. They are generally set using data on pesticide use, residue levels, dietary exposure and toxicological assessments.

The actual exposure for tea drinkers also depends on how much residue remains in the dry leaves and how much transfers into the brewed drink. Residue levels in dry tea cannot be directly compared with the amount consumed in a cup.