Is Raw Milk Worth The Risk? Truth About Raw Milk And Its Potential For Contamination
Raw milk, long debated as healthier and nutritious than pasteurized milk by enthusiasts but strongly cautioned against by health practitioners, is now a hot topic in health and wellness circles with the increasing popularity of "natural" and "unprocessed" foods. The dangers surrounding raw milk have been brought to the forefront with the outbreak of H5N1 bird flu, highlighting the risk of contamination in raw milk supplies. All about raw milk, its risks, and the latest science.
Raw milk is unpasteurized milk taken directly from cows, goats, or other similar animals. Unpasteurized milk does not go through the heat treatment process meant to destroy harmful pathogens and bacteria. Raw milk proponents say that pasteurization kills nutrients and enzymes. And that might be one false claim after another, as science continues to disprove it.
According to Dr. Meghan Davis of Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, pasteurization does not significantly alter the concentration of minerals or the quality of proteins in milk. In fact, it's a critical step to ensure food safety, particularly for animal-derived products prone to contamination.
Wellness influencers have in recent times advocated for raw milk as the "clean" and "natural" alternative to commercial milk distributed in stores, using claims from improved digestion to the stimulation of the immune system. However, these claims are not scientifically proven. Although raw milk contains antibodies, the amounts are too small to be worth anything for health.
Raw milk consumption poses immense risks. It can become contaminated in two major ways:
1. Internal Contamination: Pathogens such as E. coli, Salmonella, and Campylobacter can seep into milk through infected animals.
2. External Contamination: Polluted water, dirt, manure, and contaminated equipment introduce harmful microorganisms.
The infections acquired from raw milk include diarrhea, stomach cramps, nausea, and fever, and severe effects can be experienced by infants, the elderly, pregnant women, and even immunocompromised people. Some other rare but serious diseases like hemolytic uremic syndrome, which may bring about renal failure or stroke, have also been associated with raw milk.
Raw milk has become a focal point of the latest bird flu outbreak as preliminary genetic analysis indicates the H5N1 virus, which causes avian flu, may have begun infecting cattle earlier than thought. And the CDC says viral particles have been found in raw milk, which adds one more risk to consuming unpasteurized dairy.
A notable case was with sick and dead cats on a Texas dairy farm that resulted from ingesting unpasteurized milk from infected cows. This presents how unpasteurized milk can be a vector for transmitting diseases.
To reduce the risk, the FDA prohibited the interstate sale of unpasteurized milk in the United States. Different states, however, have their respective regulations on this matter:
- 20 states completely banned the sale of unpasteurized milk.
- 30 states allow raw milk sales under specified conditions.
Although these laws exist for protection of public health, many consumers are not even aware of the dangers associated with their consumption.
Pasteurization destroys harmful bacteria without affecting the nutritional content of milk. Several studies in *Nutrition Today* report that pasteurization does not change the nutrient profile of milk. Pasteurized milk is free from pathogens and, therefore, also a safer alternative for all consumers, especially vulnerable ones.
It's not just raw milk that's hazardous. Cheese, yogurt, and ice cream with unpasteurized milk carry the same dangers. To anyone tempted by the supposed health value of raw dairy, experts say in one voice: stick to pasteurized, and avoid illnesses like bird flu or salmonella infection.
Health organizations, including the FDA, CDC, and American Academy of Pediatrics, strongly advise against consuming raw milk. Beyond the personal health risks, drinking raw milk can also endanger others by increasing the spread of harmful bacteria and viruses.
The emergence of H5N1 in cattle and its link to raw milk calls the world to wake up to better preparedness. Like COVID-19, bird flu has demonstrated vulnerabilities in our food safety systems. The presence of avian flu in raw milk underscores the imperative for strict rules, public education, and investments in the prevention of these diseases.
Could this outbreak push governments and health organizations to step up surveillance and vaccination efforts against zoonotic diseases? The lessons learned from COVID-19 suggest a coordinated approach is essential to prevent future pandemics.
On the other hand, raw milk is far riskier and has far fewer benefits than its apparent healthy, "natural" choice. From bacterial contamination to the allowance of viruses like H5N1, there is evidence that is clear: pasteurization cannot be wished away. As we face new health challenges, it will be science over trends that safeguard public health.
A Canadian study has linked higher ultra processed food intake to increased odds of vascular brain injury visible on MRI scans. (Image Credits: iStock)
McMaster University’s release names packaged snack foods, sugary breakfast cereals, soft drinks, instant noodles and ready-to-eat frozen meals as examples of ultra-processed food.
Chips, sweet breakfast cereals, processed sweet yogurts, soft drinks, instant noodles and frozen ready meals all fall under the ultra-processed category, according to Russell de Souza, a health research professor at McMaster University and registered dietitian, speaking to CTV News.
McMaster University’s release names packaged snack foods, sugary breakfast cereals, soft drinks, instant noodles and ready-to-eat frozen meals as examples of ultra-processed food.
The study was led by McMaster’s Population Health Research Institute (PHRI) and enrolled nearly 9,000 Canadians aged 35 to 69 with no history of heart disease, according to McMaster. Participants came from two PHRI studies, the Canadian Alliance for Healthy Hearts and Minds and the Prospective Urban and Rural Epidemiology-MIND study. Each completed detailed dietary questionnaires and had an MRI brain scan, reviewed by neurologists who didn’t know their diets.
Also Read: Ozempic Baby: Can GLP-1 Drugs Help Women With PMOS Conceive?
Published October 15 in JAMA Network Open, the study found that participants with the highest intake were 40 per cent more likely to show tiny areas of brain damage than those who ate the least, per McMaster. These changes cause no obvious symptoms. They are considered early warning signs that can appear years before a stroke or memory problems.
Ultra-processed food made up about 25 per cent of participants’ daily food servings on average. For the heaviest consumers it was 45 per cent, compared with 16 per cent for the lowest group, McMaster reported.
Ultra-processed food made up about 25 per cent of participants’ daily food servings on average. For the heaviest consumers it was 45 per cent, compared with 16 per cent for the lowest group, McMaster reported. As intake rose, whole-food intake fell. Fruits, vegetables, grains and other minimally processed foods made up 41 per cent of daily servings in the highest-intake group, against 68 per cent in the lowest. Russell J. de Souza said this suggests ultra-processed foods displaced healthier whole foods rather than simply being eaten on top of a usual diet.
“I would not have expected this finding, frankly,” said de Souza, who is also an associate scientist at PHRI. The participants were middle-aged Canadians with no heart problems and no other reported health concerns, he noted. He added that this kind of damage is usually associated with conditions seen at a much older age, according to McMaster.
The association between ultra-processed food and brain damage appeared stronger among women. Those in the highest consumption group were nearly twice as likely to show signs of brain damage as those in the lowest, according to McMaster.
Participants with the highest intake also carried more body fat and more deep belly fat. McMaster’s release says this fat is linked to inflammation and blood vessel damage that can also reach the brain.
Senior author Sonia Anand, a senior scientist at PHRI, said the findings suggest the link between diet and brain health may be detectable before people notice memory or thinking problems. She said it adds to evidence that what Canadians eat from their 30s through their 60s shapes brain health later in life, per McMaster.
Because participants were assessed only once and not followed over time, the researchers couldn’t determine whether ultra-processed food directly causes these brain changes, McMaster noted. De Souza said longer-term studies with repeated MRI scans are needed to find out whether cutting back can slow or prevent them. He said such follow-up is ongoing.
Speaking to CTV News, Anand said some participants whose diets were more than 45 per cent ultra-processed showed a combination of silent stroke and a pre-stroke profile. She said the team observed an independent effect of ultra-processed food on the damage seen in the scans. In the same interview, de Souza acknowledged that avoiding these foods isn’t equally easy for everyone, with many people struggling to make ends meet. He encouraged eating at home, buying local and using supermarket sales. Some participants are now returning for follow-up MRIs, with results expected in early 2028.
Credit: AI
Navratri is a time of prayer, devotion and fasting for many people. While fasting is an important part of the celebration, what you eat during this period matters too. Choosing the right foods can help you stay energetic, avoid unnecessary hunger and maintain healthy blood sugar levels. A few simple changes to your fasting meals can make a real difference.
Fasting does not mean you have to compromise on nutrition. Instead of depending mainly on potatoes, sabudana and fried snacks, try including a variety of foods in your meals.
Some healthier choices include:
One common mistake during fasting is eating too many carbohydrate-rich foods while missing out on protein and fibre. This can leave you feeling hungry soon after a meal and may cause blood sugar levels to rise quickly.
For better balance, combine fasting grains or potatoes with protein-rich foods such as curd or paneer. Include permitted vegetables and choose whole fruits for additional fibre. Keep portions of sabudana khichdi, potato dishes and fasting flour rotis under control.
Remember, foods considered traditional or healthy during fasting can still raise blood sugar when eaten in large quantities.
Also read: Peanut Consumption Associated With Lower Type 2 Diabetes Risk: Study Explains
Sabudana, potatoes, sweets and fruit juices can raise blood sugar levels, particularly when consumed in large portions. Fried foods such as puris and pakoras can also add excess calories.
Whenever possible, choose boiled, steamed, roasted or lightly sautéed foods. Limit added sugar and avoid combining several starchy foods in the same meal.
Drinking enough water is important, especially if your fasting routine limits when you can eat or drink. Where permitted, unsweetened buttermilk can be another option. Avoid relying on sugary drinks to manage hunger or tiredness.
Instead of eating one very large meal after hours without food, choose moderate portions during your permitted eating periods.
Also read: Heart Racing During Garba: Is It Adrenaline Or A Warning Sign?
For people with diabetes, fasting needs extra care. Changes in meal timings and food intake can increase the risk of low or high blood sugar, as well as dehydration. The risk may be greater for those taking insulin or certain diabetes medicines.
Here are a few important precautions:
The takeaway: Navratri fasting can be both meaningful and mindful of your health. Simple choices, such as eating balanced meals, limiting fried foods and controlling portions, can help you feel better throughout the festival. If you have diabetes, plan your fast with your doctor to observe the tradition without putting your health at risk.
Credit: AI
Eating peanuts may help lower the risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Researchers have identified changes in blood fats that could help explain the association. The findings indicate that peanuts may impact the body’s lipid metabolism. The body weight also plays an important role in the association.
The study, published in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition in 2026, combined a dietary intervention of six months with data from a large cohort to investigate how eating peanuts changes circulating lipids and how these changes relate to cardiometabolic disease risk.
Researchers from the German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke and the University of Barcelona analysed data from two studies.
The first was the ARISTOTLE clinical trial, which involved 63 healthy adults aged 18 to 33. Participants were randomly assigned to consume one of three options daily for six months: 25 grams of skin-roasted peanuts, 32 grams of peanut butter or 32 grams of control butter made with peanut oil.
Researchers measured changes in participants’ blood lipids before and after the intervention. They then examined data from the EPIC-Potsdam cohort, which followed more than 27,000 people and included information on 774 cases of newly developed type 2 diabetes and 545 cases of cardiovascular disease.
Using a technique called lipidomics, which analyses fats circulating in the blood, the team identified a pattern of lipid changes associated with peanut consumption. They called this the “peanut lipidomic signature”
Peanut consumption altered 51 groups of fatty acids within different lipid classes, especially lipids containing very-long-chain saturated fatty acids (VLCSFAs).
These included changes involving C22:0 and C24:0 fatty acids. Researchers found that these fatty acids were incorporated into specific lipid classes, including ceramides, suggesting that peanut consumption was linked with restructuring of the blood lipid profile rather than simply an increase in fat levels.
“This is not merely a simple increase in fat levels, but a complex 'remodeling' of the lipidome,” said first author Dr. Inés Domínguez-López.
Professor Matthias Schulze explained the significance of the findings, “By characterizing this specific peanut lipid signature, we have uncovered a potential biological marker that links dietary fat quality to metabolic outcomes.”
When researchers examined the relationship between these lipid changes and disease outcomes in the larger cohort, they found that a higher PeLS was associated with a modestly lower risk of type 2 diabetes.
For every one-standard-deviation increase in the signature, the estimated risk was 11% lower. But the signature was not associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular disease in this analysis.
Body mass index (BMI) emerged as a possible explanation for much of the association between the peanut-affected lipid signature and type 2 diabetes risk.
Researchers estimated that BMI could explain approximately 89% of the observed association, although the estimate was inaccurate. This suggests that body weight or related metabolic processes may help understand the relationship.
Domínguez-López said, “This suggests that the positive metabolic effects of these specific peanut-derived lipids may be linked to their ability to support a healthier body weight or stabilize metabolic processes related to adiposity.”
Peanuts contain unsaturated fats, fibre, protein and several micronutrients, making them essential in a balanced diet. Replacing foods rich in saturated fats or highly processed snacks with unsalted peanuts may help improve overall dietary quality.
However, the findings do not prove that peanuts directly prevent diabetes. The intervention involved only 63 young, healthy adults, while the association with disease risk was assessed using a separate observational cohort. The analysis cannot establish that the lipid changes themselves caused the lower risk.
© $2026 Times Horizon Private Limited