We all know that drinking water is good for us. If you are feeling tired, have some water. Have a dry skin? Have some water. Have a dry throat? Have some water. It is almost like water is the fix to all our issues. May be it is, but not always. So, are we sometimes drinking more water than necessary? What happens then?
Many say that there is an 8x8 rule one must follow when it comes to drinking water.
Many believe that in the 8x8 rule, eight 240ml glasses of water per day adds up to almost 2 liters. However, it is not in the guidelines in both the UK and the EU health advisory. None of them recommends this specific amount.
The origins of this rule seem to come from misinterpreted advice given decades ago. In 1945, a US advisory board suggested adults should consume one milliliter of fluid per calorie of food, totaling about two liters for women and 2.5 liters for men. Importantly, this included all drinks and even water-rich foods like fruits and vegetables.
A later book in 1974 recommended six to eight glasses of water daily but also noted that coffee, tea, and even beer could count towards hydration. Yet, the idea of drinking two liters of plain water daily took hold and has persisted ever since.
As per experts, drinking 8 glasses of water a day may be unnecessary and the research estimates that the actual requirement is around 1.5 to 1.8 liters per day. This not only includes water, but all kinds of fluids from all sources that we may consume in a day.
Also, studies show that instead of following a rigid routine, what is best is to focus on factors like temperature, physical activity and health conditions for your water intake. Those in hot and humid climate, high altitudes or pregnant or breastfeeding, and athletes may require more water. Whereas those in cooler areas, with a more sedentary lifestyle won't. However, for the average person, thirst is a more reliable guide than any fixed rule.
ALSO READ: What Happens When You Drink Too Much Water?
Water is necessary to transport nutrients, control temperature, and keep organs functioning. We lose water through sweat, urine, and respiration, so staying hydrated is critical. However, dehydration develops only when the body loses 1-2% of its total water content.
A widespread myth is that feeling thirsty indicates that you are already severely dehydrated. Experts argue that thirst is an excellent evolutionary mechanism that ensures us drink when we need to. The body also produces hormones that aid in water conservation when necessary.
While drinking too much water is generally harmless, it can cause hyponatremia, a condition in which salt levels in the blood become dangerously low. This can result in brain enlargement, disorientation, convulsions, and, in extreme cases, death.
There have been reports of athletes overhydrating during endurance races, resulting in significant difficulties. Experts caution that simply following hydration myths might be dangerous, stating that thirst remains the greatest signal of when to drink.
Credits: Canva
The search for the perfect anti-ageing diet never seems to end. From intermittent fasting to keto plans, most options require discipline, calorie restrictions, or rigid meal routines. But a new trend, gaining attention worldwide and called ‘fake fasting,’ suggests you could reap the benefits of fasting without actually going hungry. And yes, experts are taking notice.
Recent research shows that “fake fasting” may provide similar age-reversing health effects as full fasting. Known as the fasting-mimicking diet (FMD), this approach is designed to imitate water fasting by affecting blood glucose, ketone levels, and other biomarkers.
Unlike traditional fasting, which means completely abstaining from food, FMD allows for a controlled intake of certain nutrients and follows a cycle: usually five days on the diet each month, with normal eating the rest of the time.
The FMD is a five-day plan that is high in unsaturated fats but low in calories, protein, and carbs, designed to mimic the effects of water-only fasting while still giving your body essential nutrients. The idea is to simulate fasting’s benefits, like targeting blood glucose and ketone levels, without going entirely without food.
During normal fasting, people consume nothing. In fake fasting, however, you eat small amounts of specific nutrients in cycles.
A study published in Nature Communications in 2024 outlined the diet’s benefits. Researchers highlighted that FMD is a five-day program rich in unsaturated fats, low in calories, protein, and carbohydrates, and structured to mimic a water-only fast while still supplying necessary nutrients, making it easier for people to complete.
Professor Valter Longo of the USC Leonard Davis School, senior author of the study, developed the diet. “This is the first study showing that a food-based approach, without requiring permanent dietary or lifestyle changes, can make people biologically younger, based on changes in both ageing and disease risk factors and a validated method by the Levine group to measure biological age,” Longo said.
In USC studies, participants went through three to four cycles of the fasting-mimicking diet, each followed by a return to regular eating. Typical meals included plant-based soups, nut bars, herbal teas, vegetable chips, and supplements packed with vitamins, minerals, and essential fats.
Key findings included:
Researchers suggested that limiting calories while following precise nutrient ratios may create an environment that supports cellular renewal.
A standard FMD program is low in protein and carbohydrates but high in healthy fats. Typical foods include:
During FMD, calories are cut to about 40–50% of normal daily intake, with protein and carbs restricted to trigger cellular and metabolic effects similar to water fasting. The diet relies on unsaturated fats, known to lower inflammation and support heart health. In the USC study, participants followed three to four monthly FMD cycles, each lasting five days, then returned to a normal or Mediterranean-style diet for the remaining 25 days.
While on FMD, participants consumed plant-based soups, energy bars, chips, drinks, and tea, along with supplements rich in vitamins, minerals, and essential fatty acids.
The study found that FMD lowered diabetes risk factors, reduced liver fat, slowed immune ageing, and decreased age-related health risks, effectively lowering biological age. “This is the first evidence from two clinical trials showing a reduction in biological age, along with rejuvenation of metabolic and immune function,” said Professor Valter Longo.
Fake fasting is not for everyone. Some may experience:
It is not recommended for pregnant or breastfeeding women, underweight individuals, or anyone with chronic health conditions unless supervised by a professional. Experts stress consulting a doctor before making major dietary changes.
(Credit - Canva)
A new study has revealed that Gen Zs eat much more ultra-processed foods than we may think. Processed foods have saturated the market over the years, however, recent researches have revealed how these foods affect our health. But do you know who is most affected by this? The study, done by the Virginia Tech, showed that not only are gen Zs more likely to overeat, but most of their diet is also affected by processed foods.
Research suggests about 62% of their total calories come from these factory-made items. A new study from Virginia Tech warns that this high intake, especially when it leads to overeating, is a major concern for their future health.
Researchers at Virginia Tech looked at 27 young men and women, aged 18 to 25. For the study, the volunteers followed two different eating plans:
81% of the calories came from ultra-processed foods.
A whole-food diet with no junk food.
The diets were strictly controlled and matched for things like fiber, sugar, and fat content to make sure the researchers were measuring the effect of processing alone, not just the nutrients. Each participant followed one diet for two weeks, took a break, and then switched to the other diet for two weeks.
According to John Hopkins University, Ultra-Processed Foods (UPFs) contains ingredients you wouldn't find in a home kitchen. These include chemical-based preservatives, industrial emulsifiers (like certain oils), high-intensity sweeteners (like high-fructose corn syrup), and artificial colors and flavors.
Furthermore, UPFs undergo intense factory processing techniques like molding, extrusion, and chemical alteration. The final product often bears almost no resemblance to the original ingredients it came from.
Common examples of UPFs include soda, packaged snacks (chips, cookies), candy, boxed macaroni and cheese, frozen ready-to-eat meals, lunch meats, and hot dogs.
After following each two-week diet, the participants were given a breakfast buffet and allowed to eat as much or as little as they wanted. The researchers noticed a key difference based on age:
This younger group consumed significantly more calories during the buffet, especially after eating the high-UPF diet for two weeks. They were also more likely to gorge themselves even when they weren't hungry.
This older group ate less and did not show the same tendency to overeat.
The study suggests that being a younger adult may be a risk factor for eating too many calories after being exposed to a high-UPF diet. This indicates that the younger participants may be more influenced by the strong, appealing nature of junk food.
The lead researcher noted that even though this was a short-term trial, if this kind of increased calorie intake continues over time, it will almost certainly lead to weight gain in these young people.
The findings are especially concerning because UPFs have already been linked to 32 negative health issues, including higher risks of heart disease, cancer, Type 2 diabetes, and mental health problems. Experts predict that if drastic measures are not taken, a third of Americans aged 15 to 24 could meet the criteria for obesity by 2050.
Credits: Canva
The latest Lancet Study warns that India is experiencing a rapid and worrying rise in the consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs). The UPF includes food like instant noodles, packaged snacks, ready-to-eat meals, sugary beverages, mass-produced breads, processed meats, and other industrially formulated products.
The paper was authored by 43 global experts who noted that traditional Indian meals are increasingly being replaced by convenient but nutritionally poor foods, which are not contributing to a rise in chronic diseases.
The Series calls for “immediate and decisive public health action”, stressing that individual willpower alone cannot fix dietary patterns. Instead, the availability, affordability, marketing, and widespread promotion of UPFs must be addressed at the policy level.
The shift has been dramatic. The retail sales of UPFs in India jumped from ₹7,996 crore in 2006 to ₹3.3 lakh crore in 2019. In other words, the initial value for the same products in 2006 was less than $ 0.9 Billion and by 2019, it reached the value of $ 38 Billion, leading to a forty-fold rise, or an increase around 4000%. This reflects a massive surge of how deeply these products have entered the Indian household.
During the same period, obesity rates among both men and women have doubled. Today, nearly one in four Indians is obese, one in ten has diabetes, and one in three has abdominal obesity. Childhood obesity has also risen, increasing from 2.1% to 3.4% between 2016 and 2019–21. The authors warn that this pattern mirrors global trends where UPF consumption is strongly linked to weight gain and metabolic disorders.
According to the papers, the UPF industry is a central driver of this shift. Because UPFs are more profitable than minimally processed foods, corporations invest heavily in their production, distribution, and marketing. This profit-focused model encourages continuous expansion, making these foods widely accessible and aggressively promoted.
The Lancet Series highlighted that the major concerns are due to corporate influence and gap in India's food regulation. The marketing network of corporate influence often delay or weaken public health policies.
They uses strategies like direct lobbying and political pressure, involvement in the government committees, litigation to block regulations, funding research that creates doubt or shifts the blames and influence public opinion through advertising and public relation campaigns.
“UPFs are advertised addictions. A ban on their advertising and sponsorship is needed,” said Prof. Srinath Reddy, Chancellor of PHFI University of Public Health Sciences to The Tribune.
The authors emphasize that the harm caused by UPFs extends far beyond poor nutrition. Industrial processes, such as chemical modification, extrusion, and the addition of synthetic ingredients, can alter food structure in ways that negatively affect metabolism, immunity, and long-term health.
Regular consumption of UPFs has been linked to higher risks of obesity, Type-2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, depression, and premature death. “These foods contribute to diminished immunity, aggravated inflammation, and a rise in life-threatening chronic diseases,” Dr. Reddy said.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited