While, technically, it is, but the packaging might make it harmful for us. As per a November 2024 study published in Chemosphere, researchers tested three different brands of tea bags for exposure of microplastics, which are also degraded plastic bits that do not breakdown and found that it could impact human health.

What were the findings?

The team found that brewing tea in polypropylene, essentially plastic bags, or a common tea bag material actually released over a billion particle per milliliter of tea. In fact, what we think as the paper bags, made of cellulose and mesh nylon bags also shed millions of plastic particle per milliliter.

John Meeker, a professor of Environmental Health Sciences and Global Public Health at the University of Michigan School of Public Health said finding such high amounts of micro and nanoplastics in a product that is supposed to be consumed is a cause of concern.

How was the study conducted?

The researchers first extracted plastics from brewed tea and then exposed them to human intestinal cells that absorbed the plastic particles. It showed that microplastics could remain in the body even after drinking the tea.

The study author Alba Garcia-Rodriguez, a researcher in the Department of Genetics and Microbiology at the Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona said the research calls attention to the path of substantial exposure to plastic particles which are also found in everyday lives. "We have to be concerned about the huge number of single-use plastic that humans are exposed to daily," she said.

How was the test conducted?

Similar tests have been conducted previously. In 2019, a Canadian study was the first one to test nylon and polyethylene tea bags which released 11.6 billion microplastics and 3.1 nanoplastics, measuring less than a micron into a single cup of tea.

In another study from 2023, conducted by Garcia-Redriguez and colleagues, one brand of tea bags were tested that was made of polylactic acid, a biodegradable plant-based plastic. The study showed that it released 1 million nanoplastic particles per tea bag.

For this 2024 study, the research team set broadened their scope by testing out for various materials. They obtained empty tea bags made from three commonly used materials: polypropylene, nylon, and cellulose.

The team simulated typical tea-brewing conditions (without tea leaves) by steeping the bags in sterile water heated to 95°C (203°F) while stirring continuously. They then measured how many plastic particles each material released.

The results revealed that polypropylene bags shed the highest amount of microplastics—approximately 1.2 billion particles. Cellulose paper bags came next, releasing 135 million particles per milliliter, while nylon mesh bags released 8.18 million particles.

The study revealed that hot temperature water exposure and also the stirring of spoon can cause tea bags to "leach plastics".

When the plastics were exposed to humans, it showed that cells absorbed the microplastics, including the mucus cells, as they had the highest uptake of particles. After 24 hours, the particles reached the nucleus of the cells, which houses the DNA.

Health Impacts

Experts find the results concerning, as ingested microplastics could enter the bloodstream after targeting tissues in the gastrointestinal tract, potentially spreading to other organs. While chemicals added during plastic production have been linked to issues like endocrine disruption and cancer, the health effects of ingested microplastics remain unclear. Scientists caution against drawing conclusions, noting that human studies on microplastics are still limited and much more research is needed.

How can one reduce the exposure to plastics? The best way possible is by buying loose leaf, even when you are using green tea, which, is mostly used in tea bags, as a way to make it instantly. In case you are in rush, you can always use the steel infuser to use it as a replacement of plastic tea bags for an instant cup of tea.

Every morning across India, fresh fruit finds its way onto the table — mangoes in summer, bananas year-round, grapes, guavas, and more. It remains one of the simplest and most powerful habits for good health. But emerging research is prompting a more nuanced question: not whether we should eat fruit, but how that fruit is grown. Dr Arjun Shah, Consultant Neurologist/Neurophysician, Saifee Hospital, spoke about the risks involved with eating unwashed fruits.

Understanding the Concern: Pesticides and Brain Health

Parkinson's disease is a progressive neurological condition in which dopamine-producing nerve cells in the brain gradually degenerate. This leads to symptoms such as tremors, stiffness, and slowed movement. In India, an estimated 5.8 lakh people are living with the condition, a number expected to rise as the population ages. The causes of Parkinson’s are complex and multifactorial. Genetics, age, and environmental exposures all play a role. Among these, long-term exposure to certain pesticides has drawn increasing scientific attention.

The Chemicals in Question

A number of pesticides have been linked, with varying levels of evidence, to neurological damage and increased Parkinson’s risk in human and animal studies:

1. Paraquat – Strong evidence; still legal in India
2. Chlorpyrifos—Moderate evidence of neurological harm; banned in the EU and US, but used in India
3. Mancozeb / Maneb – Moderate evidence, especially in combination; widely used on fruits like grapes and apples
4. Endosulfan—Strong evidence; banned in India (2011), but residues persist in soil and food chains
5. DDT – Moderate evidence; still used in malaria control programmes
6. Rotenone – Strong evidence in animal models; limited use in India

The concern is not a single meal or occasional exposure. The real issue lies in low-dose, repeated exposure over years, which may quietly accumulate risk. Parkinson’s disease is not caused by one factor alone. Pesticide exposure is just one piece of a much larger puzzle. However, reducing unnecessary exposure is a sensible and low-risk step towards long-term health.

Which Fruits Carry More Residues?

Residue levels often depend on farming practices, but certain patterns are consistently observed. Higher Residue Load (typically thin-skinned or heavily sprayed):

1. Grapes (table and wine)
2. Apples (especially imported varieties)
3. Strawberries
4. Chillies and capiscum
5. Pomegranates

Relatively Safer Choices (thick-skinned or locally grown):

1. Bananas
2. Papaya
3. Amla (Indian gooseberry)
4. Jamun
5. Guava (local and seasonal)

Practical Steps to Reduce Exposure

For most families, the goal is not perfection but simple, consistent habits that lower risk:

1. Wash thoroughly under running water for 30–60 seconds — more than just a quick rinse.
2. Soak before eating in salt water or diluted vinegar for 10–15 minutes.
3. Peel where possible, especially fruits like apples where residues concentrate on the skin.
4. Choose local and seasonal produce, which is less likely to have undergone heavy post-harvest treatment.
5. Opt for organic selectively, especially for high-residue produce like grapes and apples.

The Balanced Perspective

It is important not to lose sight of the bigger picture. Avoiding fruit altogether would do far more harm than good. Fruits are rich in antioxidants and anti-inflammatory compounds that actively support brain health. In fact, locally available options like amla, jamun, and guava are among the most nutrient-dense, neuroprotective foods — affordable, accessible, and deeply rooted in Indian diets. There is no single cause — and no single prevention — for Parkinson’s. But small, informed choices made every day can add up over a lifetime.

Many people turn to a pint of beer after a busy day at work to unwind and blow off steam, but little do they realise that they might be making their brain healthier in the process. According to scientists, a pint of beer has a host of health benefits to offer - apparently, it has brain-boosting vitamin B6, providing about 15 per cent of your daily requirement. Most of the ingredients used in beer are barley, yeast, and wheat, and these ingredients are sources of vitamin B6. However, just because of some benefits, one must not go on a mindless drinking spree.

Is beer good for your brain?

The study, published in the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, found some health benefits of beer that deserve recognition and credit, but it did not completely overlook the drawbacks. In fact, the drawbacks outweigh the benefits of drinking beer - beer belly and high blood pressure, for instance. In this study, however, researchers dug deeper into the potential benefits of drinking beer. Some of the key benefits of drinking beer are:

1. Healthy immune system
2. Good for the brain
3. Helps obtain energy from carbohydrates and proteins in food
4. Helps the body make haemoglobin

What are the dietary sources of vitamin B6?

Vitamin B6 is found in some foods, and in supermarkets, you can also buy foods fortified with vitamin B6. Some of the best dietary sources of vitamin B6 are:

1. Turkey
2. Pork
3. Chicken
4. Some types of fish
5. Bananas
6. Milk
7. Oats
8. Peanuts

Which type of beer has high vitamin B6 levels?

The study found that bock beer has the highest levels of vitamin B6 because of its high alcohol content. Following this are wheat beer and other dark beers. Non-alcoholic beers, on the other hand, have ethanol removed after full fermentation and provide higher vitamin B6 levels than those that are made with yeasts that produce less ethanol.

How much vitamin B6 do you need in a day?

Researchers noted that men need about 1.4 mg of vitamin B6 per day and women need 1.2 mg. An average lager can provide 20 per cent of the daily requirement, while a non-alcoholic version can provide about 59 per cent. The research further found that one litre of beer can contain 0.3 to 1 mg of vitamin B6. The study findings, therefore, are only beneficial for people looking to optimise their vitamin B6 intake. Researchers also said that because vitamin B6 is found in abundance in food sources, there is almost no need for one to turn to beer for this purpose.

Especially for people dealing with certain health issues, such as chronic kidney disease or alcoholism, beer must not be relied upon to increase vitamin intake. Instead, it is important to focus on other sources of B vitamins like B12 or B2, which are found in abundance in animal foods and dairy products. These foods can also help you absorb energy better from food and play a role in metabolism. People who are vegan can opt for other fortified substitutes to meet their nutritional requirements.

Fruits and vegetables are widely recommended to improve health and reduce the risk of cancer and other diseases. However, a new study claimed that eating a very healthy diet—packed with fruits, vegetables, and whole grains—can raise the risk of lung cancer.

Shockingly, the study showed that the risk of lung cancer with a healthy diet may be higher in younger non-smokers.

The research from the University of Southern California, presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research, found that patients under 50 diagnosed with lung cancer often had better-than-average diets.

The experts zeroed in on the culprit—pesticide exposure from conventionally grown produce.

"Our research shows that younger non-smokers who eat a higher quantity of healthy foods than the general population are more likely to develop lung cancer," said lead investigator Jorge Nieva, a medical oncologist and lung cancer specialist with USC.

"These counter-intuitive findings raise important questions about an unknown environmental risk factor for lung cancer related to otherwise beneficial food that needs to be addressed," Nieva added.

Pesticides In Healthy Foods — A Hidden Risk

According to the researchers, the reason may lie in environmental exposure, particularly pesticides used in agriculture. Nieva noted that commercially produced (non-organic) fruits, vegetables, and whole grains are more likely to carry higher levels of pesticide residue compared to dairy, meat, and many processed foods.

He also pointed out that agricultural workers who are regularly exposed to pesticides tend to have higher rates of lung cancer, which supports the possibility of a connection.

The study also found that young women who do not smoke are diagnosed with lung cancer more often than men in the same age group. Women in the study also tended to consume more fruits, vegetables, and whole grains than men.

What Is Lung Cancer?

Lung Cancer is one of the most common and serious types of cancer. It is also the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with approximately 2.5 million new cases and 1.8 million deaths reported in 2022.

Traditionally, lung cancer occurs in older people. However, non-smokers age 50 and younger, particularly women, are now experiencing increasing rates of lung cancer and are more likely than men to develop the disease.

In many cases, there are no symptoms; however, one must look out for these:

• a persistent cough
• coughing up blood
• persistent breathlessness
• unexplained tiredness and weight loss
• an ache or pain when breathing or coughing.

Why More Research Needed

Nieva emphasized that more research is needed to confirm any link between pesticide exposure and lung cancer in younger people, especially women.

In this study, researchers did not directly measure pesticide levels in the foods participants ate. Instead, they estimated exposure using existing data on average pesticide levels in food categories such as fruits, vegetables, and grains.