While, technically, it is, but the packaging might make it harmful for us. As per a November 2024 study published in Chemosphere, researchers tested three different brands of tea bags for exposure of microplastics, which are also degraded plastic bits that do not breakdown and found that it could impact human health.
The team found that brewing tea in polypropylene, essentially plastic bags, or a common tea bag material actually released over a billion particle per milliliter of tea. In fact, what we think as the paper bags, made of cellulose and mesh nylon bags also shed millions of plastic particle per milliliter.
John Meeker, a professor of Environmental Health Sciences and Global Public Health at the University of Michigan School of Public Health said finding such high amounts of micro and nanoplastics in a product that is supposed to be consumed is a cause of concern.
The researchers first extracted plastics from brewed tea and then exposed them to human intestinal cells that absorbed the plastic particles. It showed that microplastics could remain in the body even after drinking the tea.
The study author Alba Garcia-Rodriguez, a researcher in the Department of Genetics and Microbiology at the Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona said the research calls attention to the path of substantial exposure to plastic particles which are also found in everyday lives. "We have to be concerned about the huge number of single-use plastic that humans are exposed to daily," she said.
Similar tests have been conducted previously. In 2019, a Canadian study was the first one to test nylon and polyethylene tea bags which released 11.6 billion microplastics and 3.1 nanoplastics, measuring less than a micron into a single cup of tea.
In another study from 2023, conducted by Garcia-Redriguez and colleagues, one brand of tea bags were tested that was made of polylactic acid, a biodegradable plant-based plastic. The study showed that it released 1 million nanoplastic particles per tea bag.
For this 2024 study, the research team set broadened their scope by testing out for various materials. They obtained empty tea bags made from three commonly used materials: polypropylene, nylon, and cellulose.
The team simulated typical tea-brewing conditions (without tea leaves) by steeping the bags in sterile water heated to 95°C (203°F) while stirring continuously. They then measured how many plastic particles each material released.
The results revealed that polypropylene bags shed the highest amount of microplastics—approximately 1.2 billion particles. Cellulose paper bags came next, releasing 135 million particles per milliliter, while nylon mesh bags released 8.18 million particles.
The study revealed that hot temperature water exposure and also the stirring of spoon can cause tea bags to "leach plastics".
When the plastics were exposed to humans, it showed that cells absorbed the microplastics, including the mucus cells, as they had the highest uptake of particles. After 24 hours, the particles reached the nucleus of the cells, which houses the DNA.
Experts find the results concerning, as ingested microplastics could enter the bloodstream after targeting tissues in the gastrointestinal tract, potentially spreading to other organs. While chemicals added during plastic production have been linked to issues like endocrine disruption and cancer, the health effects of ingested microplastics remain unclear. Scientists caution against drawing conclusions, noting that human studies on microplastics are still limited and much more research is needed.
How can one reduce the exposure to plastics? The best way possible is by buying loose leaf, even when you are using green tea, which, is mostly used in tea bags, as a way to make it instantly. In case you are in rush, you can always use the steel infuser to use it as a replacement of plastic tea bags for an instant cup of tea.
Credit: iStock
Ever wondered why a food you have eaten comfortably for years suddenly starts causing bloating, abdominal discomfort or bowel changes? The food may not have changed — your gut may have.
Food intolerance can develop in adulthood as the gut microbiome, digestive enzymes, intestinal lining and gut-brain interactions change with age, illness, medications, diet, stress and other factors.
“The intestine is a dynamic ecosystem. Its microbiome, immune system, intestinal lining and digestive enzymes are constantly changing and adapting to factors such as age, infections, antibiotics, medications, diet, stress and hormonal changes,” Dr. Amit Maydeo, Chairman, Institute of Gastrosciences, Sir HN Reliance Foundation Hospital, told HealthandMe.
Dr. Geeta Malkan-Billa, Director of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, highlighted several changes that can affect food tolerance:
Dr Amit said that changes in gut bacteria can alter how carbohydrates and fibers are fermented, while a more sensitive gut lining can make previously tolerated foods feel uncomfortable.
A previous gut infection can also leave the gut more sensitive. After gastroenteritis, some people develop post-infectious IBS, which can make certain foods trigger symptoms.
Stress can further amplify these sensations through the gut-brain axis. As the nervous system becomes more sensitive, normal amounts of gas or intestinal distension may feel uncomfortable, Dr. Amit said.
Not every reaction to food is an intolerance. Some conditions can look similar but are actually different:
So, a new reaction to a familiar food should not automatically be labelled as food intolerance.
Before cutting gluten from your diet, get celiac serology testing, as going gluten-free beforehand can affect the results.
A two-week food and symptom diary can also help identify patterns. Note:
The key is to remember that the food itself may not have suddenly become “bad” for you. Your gut’s ability to process and tolerate it may have changed.
Sometimes, however, a new food allergy or another gastrointestinal disorder may need to be ruled out.
Certain symptoms should not simply be blamed on food intolerance. See a doctor if you experience:
These symptoms need medical evaluation rather than simply eliminating foods from your diet.
Credit: AI
Sorbitol is often seen as a healthier alternative to sugar. The sugar alcohol is widely used in sugar-free chewing gum, candies and other low-calorie foods, offering sweetness with fewer calories than regular sugar.
But new research suggests that sorbitol may not just pass through the digestive system as it was previously assumed.
Scientists have found that after reaching the liver, sorbitol may be converted into a compound related to fructose, where it could trigger metabolic changes associated with fatty liver disease.
Researchers from Washington University in St. Louis used zebrafish models to analyse what happens to sorbitol after it enters the body.
They found that after eating a meal, sorbitol can be produced naturally in the intestine from the glucose. What happens next depends partly on the bacteria residing in the gut.
Certain bacteria, including Aeromonas strains that degrades sorbitol, can consume sorbitol and convert it into a harmless bacterial byproduct. This may act as a protective filter, preventing the compound from reaching the liver.
But when those bacteria are absent, more sorbitol may pass through to the liver. Researchers found sorbitol can be converted into a derivative of fructose.
The researchers describe sorbitol as being “one transformation away from fructose”, because of how closely the two compounds are connected through metabolism.
Also read: Should You Really Cut Out Rice And Roti To Lose Weight? Expert Explains The Truth About Carbs
The metabolism of fructose in the liver has been linked to steatotic liver disease, a condition in which excess fat accumulates in liver cells. The new findings suggest that sorbitol may have some of the same metabolic effects.
The researchers found that sorbitol could contribute to processes linked with liver fat accumulation when the gut's ability to break it down was impaired.
However, this does not mean that eating sugar-free gum or food containing sorbitol will automatically and mandatorily cause fatty liver disease.
The research was conducted in zebrafish, and the study is exploring a biological mechanism rather than demonstrating that ordinary dietary sorbitol causes liver disease in humans.
One of the more unexpected findings was the potential role of the gut microbiome in preventing this scenario. At relatively low levels, including amounts naturally obtained from fruit, researchers found that bacteria appeared capable of breaking down sorbitol.
Problems may surface when the amount of sorbitol becomes too high for these microbes to process efficiently. That could happen through consuming large quantities of products that contain sorbitol. High glucose intake may also increase the amount of sorbitol produced inside the intestine.
The researchers therefore suggest that how much sorbitol is consumed and the composition of an individual's gut bacteria could influence what happens to the compound and thus shape the risk of liver disease.
The study does not establish that sorbitol is harmful for humans even when consumed in moderate amounts. In fact, sorbitol occurs naturally in fruits such as stone fruits, and the researchers noted that relatively low amounts are generally handled effectively by gut bacteria.
The findings challenge the assumption that sugar substitutes are automatically metabolically healthy simply because they contain less sugar or fewer calories.
Credit: AI
Carbohydrates have unfortunately become one of the most misunderstood parts of the diet, particularly when it comes to weight loss.
Cutting out rice, roti or other carbohydrate-rich foods completely is not necessarily the answer. Carbohydrates are an important source of energy, and the issue is more about the quality, quantity and overall balance of the diet than the nutrient itself.
For Indians, this becomes particularly relevant because staples such as rice, roti, poha, idli and other grain-based foods are an integral part of our traditional diets.
Removing them completely can sometimes make a diet unnecessarily restrictive and difficult to sustain. It may also mean missing out on foods that provide fibre, vitamins, minerals and other nutrients, particularly when whole grains and minimally processed sources are chosen.
Also read: The New Nutrition Gap: Why Knowing What To Eat Doesn't Mean We Actually Eat It
What matters is understanding the difference between refined and high-quality carbohydrate sources. A diet dominated by refined flour, sugary foods, sweetened beverages and highly processed snacks is very different from one that includes whole grains, millets, legumes, vegetables and appropriately portioned rice or roti.
Another common mistake is replacing carbohydrates with excessive amounts of protein or fat without considering the overall nutritional balance.
Weight loss ultimately depends on overall energy intake, dietary quality, physical activity, sleep and several other factors—not simply whether carbohydrates are present on the plate.
Also read: Protein Is In Everything, But Is Every Source Actually Healthy? Experts Explain
A practical approach is to focus on portions and pair carbohydrates with protein, vegetables and healthy fats. For example, roti with dal and vegetables or rice with dal, vegetables and curd can form a balanced meal. Choosing less-refined carbohydrate sources and paying attention to portion sizes can make the diet both nutritious and sustainable.
Carbohydrates do not need to be feared or completely eliminated. The goal should be to eat the right kind, in appropriate portions, as part of a balanced diet rather than following the latest anti-carb trend.
© $2026 Times Horizon Private Limited