While, technically, it is, but the packaging might make it harmful for us. As per a November 2024 study published in Chemosphere, researchers tested three different brands of tea bags for exposure of microplastics, which are also degraded plastic bits that do not breakdown and found that it could impact human health.

What were the findings?

The team found that brewing tea in polypropylene, essentially plastic bags, or a common tea bag material actually released over a billion particle per milliliter of tea. In fact, what we think as the paper bags, made of cellulose and mesh nylon bags also shed millions of plastic particle per milliliter.

John Meeker, a professor of Environmental Health Sciences and Global Public Health at the University of Michigan School of Public Health said finding such high amounts of micro and nanoplastics in a product that is supposed to be consumed is a cause of concern.

How was the study conducted?

The researchers first extracted plastics from brewed tea and then exposed them to human intestinal cells that absorbed the plastic particles. It showed that microplastics could remain in the body even after drinking the tea.

The study author Alba Garcia-Rodriguez, a researcher in the Department of Genetics and Microbiology at the Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona said the research calls attention to the path of substantial exposure to plastic particles which are also found in everyday lives. "We have to be concerned about the huge number of single-use plastic that humans are exposed to daily," she said.

How was the test conducted?

Similar tests have been conducted previously. In 2019, a Canadian study was the first one to test nylon and polyethylene tea bags which released 11.6 billion microplastics and 3.1 nanoplastics, measuring less than a micron into a single cup of tea.

In another study from 2023, conducted by Garcia-Redriguez and colleagues, one brand of tea bags were tested that was made of polylactic acid, a biodegradable plant-based plastic. The study showed that it released 1 million nanoplastic particles per tea bag.

For this 2024 study, the research team set broadened their scope by testing out for various materials. They obtained empty tea bags made from three commonly used materials: polypropylene, nylon, and cellulose.

The team simulated typical tea-brewing conditions (without tea leaves) by steeping the bags in sterile water heated to 95°C (203°F) while stirring continuously. They then measured how many plastic particles each material released.

The results revealed that polypropylene bags shed the highest amount of microplastics—approximately 1.2 billion particles. Cellulose paper bags came next, releasing 135 million particles per milliliter, while nylon mesh bags released 8.18 million particles.

The study revealed that hot temperature water exposure and also the stirring of spoon can cause tea bags to "leach plastics".

When the plastics were exposed to humans, it showed that cells absorbed the microplastics, including the mucus cells, as they had the highest uptake of particles. After 24 hours, the particles reached the nucleus of the cells, which houses the DNA.

Health Impacts

Experts find the results concerning, as ingested microplastics could enter the bloodstream after targeting tissues in the gastrointestinal tract, potentially spreading to other organs. While chemicals added during plastic production have been linked to issues like endocrine disruption and cancer, the health effects of ingested microplastics remain unclear. Scientists caution against drawing conclusions, noting that human studies on microplastics are still limited and much more research is needed.

How can one reduce the exposure to plastics? The best way possible is by buying loose leaf, even when you are using green tea, which, is mostly used in tea bags, as a way to make it instantly. In case you are in rush, you can always use the steel infuser to use it as a replacement of plastic tea bags for an instant cup of tea.

A growing body of research is raising fresh concerns about how deeply smartphones are shaping not just attention spans, but also eating habits and self-image among young people. A recent study published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research has found that excessive and compulsive smartphone use may significantly increase the risk of disordered eating behaviors in adolescents and young adults.

Smartphones Could Turn Into Dependency

The study centers on what researchers describe as Problematic Smartphone Use, or PSU. This is not simply spending long hours on a device, but a pattern marked by psychological dependence, difficulty cutting back, and anxiety when separated from the phone. Unlike casual or necessary screen time, PSU begins to interfere with daily functioning and emotional well-being.

To understand the scale of the issue, researchers analyzed 35 studies involving more than 52,000 participants, with an average age of 17. The findings paint a worrying picture. Young individuals who showed signs of smartphone dependency were more likely to engage in unhealthy eating behaviors. These included emotional overeating, uncontrolled food consumption, and patterns resembling food addiction, even in the absence of a formal diagnosis.

A 7-hour Tipping Point

One of the most striking findings of the study is the identification of a potential threshold. The risk of disordered eating rose significantly among those who used their smartphones for more than seven hours a day. While this may not seem unusual in an increasingly digital world, the study suggests that crossing this limit could have tangible effects on both mental and physical health.

A key factor driving this link appears to be body image dissatisfaction. Constant exposure to curated and often unrealistic images on social media platforms can distort perceptions of beauty and self-worth. Over time, this can lead to unhealthy comparisons and a strained relationship with food.

More Than Screen Time

Importantly, the researchers highlight that not all screen time carries the same risk. The distinction between general use and PSU is crucial. It is the compulsive nature of usage, accompanied by withdrawal symptoms and loss of control, that is most strongly associated with negative outcomes.

The study does not claim that smartphones directly cause eating disorders. Instead, they act as a contributing factor that can amplify existing vulnerabilities, particularly in impressionable age groups.

Wider Mental Health Implications

Beyond eating behaviors, excessive smartphone use has also been linked to anxiety, depression, lower physical activity levels, and reduced productivity. These interconnected issues suggest that digital habits are playing a broader role in shaping overall health.

What Could Help?

Experts suggest that small, consistent changes can make a difference. Setting clear boundaries for screen time, taking regular breaks, and engaging in offline activities such as sports or hobbies can help restore balance. Encouraging mindful use of technology, especially among younger users, is increasingly being seen as an important step in both prevention and intervention.

As smartphones continue to be an inseparable part of daily life, the study highlights the need to look beyond convenience and consider their deeper psychological impact.

Tuberculosis continues to be one of India’s most persistent infectious diseases, but beyond medicines and diagnostics, one factor often decides how well a patient recovers or resists infection in the first place: nutrition. Experts say food and lifestyle are not just supportive elements in TB care. They are central to both recovery and prevention.

Why Nutrition Matters More Than You Think

Tuberculosis and malnutrition are closely linked. The infection weakens the body, reduces appetite, and leads to weight loss, while poor nutrition further lowers immunity, making it harder to fight the disease. Research, including findings published in PubMed Central, shows that undernutrition significantly increases the risk of developing active TB and worsens outcomes during treatment.

Dr Mihir Gangakhedkar explains that TB is both a cause and effect of protein energy malnutrition. In simple terms, poor dietary habits can increase susceptibility, and the disease itself further drains nutritional reserves. To counter this, patients often require nearly 1.5 times their usual calorie intake to regain weight and strength.

Read: Is Cough Really Necessary For TB? 80% Of Patients Don't Have It, Says Study

What Should TB Patients Eat?

Experts agree that rebuilding the body starts with prioritizing protein and calorie intake.

Dr Sumeet Singhania recommends including protein-rich foods such as eggs, lentils, dairy products, and meat to help repair tissues and regain muscle mass. Dr Gangakhedkar echoes this, adding paneer, curd, and even protein supplements if needed.

Alongside protein, micronutrients play a critical role. Colorful fruits and vegetables provide vitamins A and C, which support immune function and recovery. Whole grains like millets offer sustained energy, which is crucial for patients dealing with fatigue.

Another key takeaway from research is consistency. The RATIONS study in India demonstrated that improving dietary intake among families of TB patients reduced disease incidence by nearly 40 percent. This highlights that nutrition is not just important for patients, but also for those living with them.

Patients are also advised to avoid processed and junk foods, which offer little nutritional value and may slow recovery.

Read: World Tuberculosis Day 2026: Theme, Origin, And Significance

Can Lifestyle Changes Prevent TB?

While TB spreads through airborne droplets, not everyone exposed develops the disease. Immunity plays a decisive role here.

Dr Harsha Jain emphasizes that a strong immune system can significantly reduce the risk of developing active TB. This includes maintaining a balanced diet, engaging in regular physical activity, getting adequate sleep, and managing stress.

Certain habits can increase vulnerability. Smoking damages the lungs and weakens local immunity, while excessive alcohol intake can impair overall immune response. Avoiding these is considered essential.

Environmental factors also matter. Good ventilation reduces the concentration of infectious droplets in the air, and simple practices like covering the mouth while coughing can limit transmission. Early screening, especially for high-risk individuals, adds another layer of protection.

Food, Habits And Recovery Go Hand In Hand

TB treatment is often long and demanding, but recovery is not driven by medication alone. A nutrient-rich diet helps the body heal faster, regain weight, and tolerate treatment better. At the same time, healthy lifestyle choices strengthen immunity and reduce the chances of infection or relapse.

In a country where TB remains widespread, these everyday choices can quietly make a powerful difference.

Dr. Sumeet Singhania is a Consultant, Pulmonary Medicine at Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital, Mumbai

Dr Harsha Jain is a Consultant - Pulmonologist at Sahyadri Super Specialty, Deccan

Dr. Mihir Gangakhedkar is a Consultant - Pulmonology at Fortis Hospital Mulund, Mumbai

Hyderabad pediatrician Dr. Sivaranjani Santosh shared on X, previously Twitter that she has been sent a notice by JTNL Consumer Health (India) Private Limited, a Kenvue Inc. company. The notice claimed that Dr Sivaranjini has been maligning the names of ORSL and ERZL for her "own commercial benefits" and for "increasing the number of followers" on her page.

Also Read: Shigella Cases Rise To 12 In Kerala: Doctor Explains Why The Bacterial Infection Is Fatal For Young Kids

Dr Sivaranjini has been campaigning that commercial beverages labeled as ORS were often high in sugar and nutritionally different from the WHO-recommended Oral Rehydration Solution, a life-saving treatment for dehydration. In a statement following the court order, Dr. Sivaranjani said, “The long battle we have won! ORSL cannot produce new high-sugar ORSL, but it wants to clear out its existing ₹180 crore stock. India, please stand with me! People’s power has to win against corporate lobbying.”

Dr Sivaranjini claims that this is why she has been sent a notice by the company. However, the truth is that ORSL or ERZL, while specializes in hydration solution and claims it as solutions for illness and daily fluid replenishment, however, it does not match the WHO standards.

Also Read: Beat The Heat With ORS: How To Know Which One Is Real?

A Doctor's 8-year-long Fight Against Fake ORS

In 2022, Dr Sivaranjini filed a Public Interest Litigation in the Telangana High Court seeking directions for manufacturers to remove the letters “ORS” from the product name ORSL. Following the petition, companies began promoting the idea of “silent dehydration,” a term that does not appear in recognised medical literature, to market the drink.

the problem is that while there are disclaimers on the ORSL tetra packs that state: “Do not use during diarrhoea,” but these disclaimers are often printed in very small fonts, and easy to overlook. “Pharmacists also prefer selling ORSL because they earn a higher margin, as ORSL is twice as expensive as standard ORS solutions,” said Dr Sivaranjini.

Dr Sivaranjini has documented cases of children developing life-threatening dehydration despite being administered drinks marketed as ORS. These are so-called "repair solution" drinks, as she calls them, which contain excessive sugar and inadequate salt and electrolyte ratios and can undermine the purpose of a life-saving medical formulation, which is recognized by the WHO.

Dr Santosh explains: "During diarrhoea, high-sugar drinks should be avoided because excess sugar can worsen the condition.When ORSL was introduced, manufacturers met with paediatricians, leading many to believe it was ORS. But in reality, the sugar content in ORSL is as high as in packaged soft/fruit drinks, with only a little extra sodium. We noticed that many children’s diarrhoea worsened. When we investigated we realised ORSL is not the same as ORS.”

What Is ORS?

It is an adequate glucose-electrolyte solution called the Oral Rehydration Salts (ORS) solution. It was first used in 1969, and then a new solution has been recommended by the WHO and the UNICEF since 2003. This use of ORS formulation, as WHO mentions has improved effectiveness from as compared to the old solution.