Image Credit: Canva
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder that affects millions of people, both children and adults. The key characteristics are hyperactivity, impulsivity, and inattention. Because of many obstacles, researchers have been searching for other therapies—inclining to include diet intervention to control the symptoms of ADHD more effectively. One interesting area of research is that for chili peppers! Yes, you read it correctly, scientists are studying the effects of chilli peppers in order to help ease symptoms of ADHD through their action on gut microbiota and the gut-brain axis.
The gut-brain axis (GBA) is a two-way communication system that connects the gastrointestinal tract with the central nervous system. It has significant roles in brain function, emotional control, and cognitive processes. The most recent research indicates that gut microbiota- bacteria living in the digestive system can potentially affect ADHD by impacting the production of neurotransmitters and brain structure.
People with ADHD tend to have reduced levels of healthy gut bacteria, including Lactobacillus, and a less diverse gut microbiota. This imbalance can contribute to greater neuroinflammation and oxidative stress, both of which are involved in ADHD pathology.
Gut microbiota also control the production of dopamine and serotonin, two neurotransmitters critical for attention, impulse control, and emotional stability.
Chili peppers have bioactive molecules, such as capsaicin, vitamin C, and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), that could affect symptoms of ADHD through modulation of the gut microbiota and neurotransmitter concentration.
Capsaicin, the phytochemical in chili peppers, has been found to modulate neurotransmitter levels. Experiments with animals reveal that capsaicin boosts the levels of serotonin and dopamine in the brain, which has the potential to enhance attention and impulse control.
Additionally, capsaicin has been shown to inhibit neuroinflammation and oxidative stress, both of which are associated with ADHD pathology. Through the reduction of these variables, capsaicin could help to decrease some ADHD symptoms. While animal models offer promising information, human studies are needed to ascertain if capsaicin supplementation can produce a concrete effect on ADHD symptoms.
Chili peppers are a rich source of vitamin C, a potent antioxidant that enhances immune function, neurotransmitter production, and iron absorption. New evidence indicates that vitamin C can also increase the prevalence of helpful microbes such as Lachnospiraceae in the gut microbiota. Gut microbial balance has been implicated in neurodevelopmental diseases such as ADHD, and vitamin C's activity in regulating gut microbes could potentially be used as a therapy.
Moreover, vitamin C also decreases brain inflammation, which tends to be higher in patients with ADHD.
Chili peppers are also rich in PUFAs, such as omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids. Studies have established that patients with ADHD tend to have lower levels of omega-3 PUFAs, which are important for brain function, synaptic plasticity, and regulation of neurotransmitters. Omega-3 supplementation has been shown to enhance memory function and boost short-chain fatty acid (SCFA)-producing gut bacteria, which promote brain and gut health.
Given that PUFAs have anti-inflammatory properties and maintain cognitive function, their occurrence in chili peppers contributes to the accumulating data indicating dietary intervention may be effective in modulating ADHD symptoms.
Although chili peppers have bioactive substances that could affect the gut-brain axis and help alleviate ADHD symptoms, their impact is speculative until stricter human trials are carried out. Being a readily available food item, peppers can be used as a possible adjunct therapy, which can be added to conventional ADHD treatments. Peppers, however, cannot be used as a substitute for established medical therapies, including behavioral therapy and prescription drugs.
The developing connection between nutrition, gut microbiome, and ADHD has paved the way for exploring non-medication interventions. Chili peppers, rich in capsaicin, vitamin C, and PUFAs, represent a novel yet unproven method for modulating ADHD symptoms. While early research points towards a possible intervention by chili peppers in modulating neurotransmitter content and minimizing neuroinflammation, human studies are essential to validate the observations.
Credit: AI
Children who consume more ultra-processed foods may show stronger brain responses that could make them crave those foods repeatedly. This helps explain the link between these foods and childhood weight gain, according to a new study.
The research, published in JAMA Network Open, found that kids who ate more ultra-processed foods had greater activity in a brain region that is involved in reward and motivation when they saw tempting pictures of appetising foods. That brain activity was also associated with increase in body fat over the following year.
The findings raise important questions about how eating highly processed foods frequently may affect a developing brain.
Also read: Six To Eight Cups Of Tea A Day Linked To Lower Heart Disease Risk: But Should You Drink More?
The study included 46 children aged 7 to 10 who had a healthy weight at the beginning of the research. Scientists collected data about their diets and used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine brain activity while the children viewed pictures of appetising foods, including cookies and French fries.
The researchers focused on the striatum, a brain region involved in learning, motivation and reward anticipation.
Children who consumed more ultra-processed foods showed stronger responses in the dorsal striatum when viewing food images. Greater activity in this region was also linked with an increase in body mass index (BMI) and body fat percentage one year later.
The researchers found that accounting for differences in brain responses weakened the association between ultra-processed food intake and subsequent increases in BMI by 31% and body fat percentage by 44%. This suggests that brain activity related to reward may help explain part of the relationship.
Senior study author Dr Kathleen A. Page, a professor of medicine and pediatrics at the Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, said, “This study goes beyond just understanding that UPFs affect weight gain. It actually gives us insight into the neurobiological underpinnings by which these foods may be linked to body composition over time.”
Also read: Peanut Consumption Associated With Lower Type 2 Diabetes Risk: Study Explains
Ultra-processed foods include many packaged snacks, sugary cereals, sweetened drinks, instant meals and other similar products. They are often designed to be convenient, appealing, and have a long shelf life.
The researchers say childhood is an important period for understanding how food habits influence eating patterns and long-term health.
“Children’s brains are still developing, habits are still forming and food preferences are still being made. It’s an important period where the brain is very sensitive to food and the food environment,” Page said.
The research had key limitations. It involved only 46 children, assessed brain activity at a single time point and followed changes in body composition for one year. The observational design means researchers cannot determine whether greater ultra-processed food consumption caused the brain responses or whether other factors contributed to both.
The findings point to existing concerns about children's diets high in ultra-processed foods. Page emphasised the importance of making healthier options more accessible.
“Changing the food environment to help people access healthier, more minimally processed foods is an important part of the solution,” she said.
Families can offer more fruits, vegetables, whole grains, pulses and other minimally processed foods while limiting consumption of sugary drinks and packaged snacks.
Whey protein can help meet daily protein requirements, but research suggests total protein intake matters more than supplement timing for muscle growth. (Image Credits: iStock)
Whey protein is one of the most heavily marketed supplements in the fitness world, but the actual science behind it is more modest than the gym lore suggests.
Muscle is constantly being broken down and rebuilt, and the balance between those two processes over weeks and months determines whether you gain or lose muscle.
Resistance training raises the rate of muscle rebuilding, called muscle protein synthesis, and eating protein raises it further. Whey, the liquid left over when milk becomes cheese, digests quickly and is naturally high in leucine, an amino acid that appears to help trigger that rebuilding process. In short-term lab studies, this gives whey a sharper spike in synthesis compared with slower-digesting proteins like casein.
A short-term spike doesn’t automatically mean more muscle over months, though. What actually matters for long-term gains is a different question: how much total protein someone eats in a day.
A widely cited 2018 meta-analysis in the British Journal of Sports Medicine, led by Robert Morton and colleagues at McMaster University, looked at this directly. Pooling 49 resistance training trials with 1,863 participants, the researchers found that protein supplementation significantly increased gains in strength, muscle mass, and muscle fibre size compared with resistance training alone.
The benefits levelled off once total daily protein intake reached roughly 1.62 grams per kilogram of body weight, the study found. Past that point, extra protein, from whey or any other source, mostly just becomes calories. For an 80-kilogram (176-pound) person, that threshold works out to about 130 grams of protein a day.
Also Read: Is Lemon Water Really Helpful for Preventing Kidney Stones?
The idea of a 30-minute “anabolic window” after a workout has largely fallen out of favour in the research. When studies control for how much protein people ate in total, tight timing around workouts shows little added benefit.
Total daily intake is what predicts outcomes, not whether a shake was consumed within a specific window after training. Spreading protein across three or four meals a day is a reasonable habit, but missing a post-workout shake by an hour or two makes little practical difference.
If someone’s diet already supplies enough protein from food, around that 1.6 g/kg mark, a shake adds little extra benefit. Whey becomes useful mainly as a convenient way to close a gap when a person’s diet otherwise falls short, particularly because of its speed, high leucine content, and long shelf life compared with whole-food protein sources like chicken, eggs, or fish.
A few groups should be cautious. People with kidney disease should talk to a doctor before raising protein intake, and whey, as a dairy product, isn’t suitable for anyone with a milk allergy. People with lactose intolerance may tolerate whey isolate, which has less lactose than concentrate, but should check with a clinician if unsure.
Whey builds muscle the same way other high-quality proteins do: by helping people hit a sufficient total daily protein target alongside resistance training. It isn’t a shortcut or a requirement, just one convenient tool among several for reaching the same number. Training remains the main driver of muscle growth. Protein, whey included, is what supports it.
Credit: AI
Avid tea drinkers now have a reason to rejoice as drinking tea regularly may be linked with a lower risk of cardiovascular disease. A new study has found that people who drank around six to eight cups a day are at low risk. However, researchers warn that this does not mean everyone should increase their tea consumption.
Published in the Journal of Internal Medicine, the study examined data from 485,934 adults in China, aged 30 to 79. Over an average follow-up of about nine years, researchers identified 14,863 cases of cardiovascular and other vascular diseases, including heart attacks, strokes and peripheral artery disease.
People who drank tea at least three days a week had an approximately 11% lower risk of developing vascular disease than those who drank it less frequently.
The lowest estimated risk was observed among people who drank around six to eight cups daily. However, risk began to rise again at higher consumption levels.
The findings are based on an observational study. It means that they just show an association rather than proving that tea directly prevents heart disease. It is also important to note that participants reported their own habits of drinking tea, and researchers did not use a standard cup size.
Emergency physician Dr Leana Wen cautioned against interpreting the results and drinking multiple cups of tea as a daily target, according to CNN. She said, "People should not interpret this to mean that everyone should aim to drink six to eight cups of tea daily."
Also read: India Proposes Lower Pesticide Residue Limits In Tea Than US & Japan: What Are The Health Risks?
The study mostly found associations between black tea consumption and lower cardiovascular risk across different types of vascular disease. Green tea showed benefits for heart health, according to the study.
Black and green tea come from the same plant, Camellia sinensis, but the leaves are processed differently, resulting in different compositions of polyphenols.
Tea contains polyphenols, including flavonoids, which have antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. These compounds may help support blood vessel function. Some research has also linked tea consumption with improvements in blood pressure and cholesterol.
However, researchers cannot rule out other lifestyle factors. People who drink tea regularly may differ from non-drinkers in their diet, physical activity, smoking habits and other aspects of health.
Dr Wen said, “Both can be part of a heart-healthy diet — especially if people take care to drink them without added sugar.”
Also read: Mississippi Student Deaths Put Kratom Under Scrutiny: How Dangerous Is It?
The study also found that people who reported drinking tea at a “burning hot” temperature had a 16% higher risk of vascular disease than those who did not regularly drink tea.
The researchers trusted the participants' descriptions of their preferred drinking temperature, rather than measuring the temperature directly. The finding should therefore be interpreted accordingly.
There is another reason to let tea cool before drinking it. Repeated consumption of very hot beverages has been linked to an increased risk of oesophageal cancer.
The study does not prove that drinking more tea will lower an individual's risk of heart disease, and the findings may not apply in the same way to every population.
Additionally, tea also contains caffeine. An eight-ounce cup of black tea typically contains around 30 to 50 milligrams, while green tea generally contains less. Excessive caffeine intake can contribute to sleep problems, anxiety or palpitations. Pregnant people are generally advised to limit caffeine to 200 milligrams a day,.
Drinking unsweetened tea can be part of a daily diet, especially when it replaces sugary drinks. Apart from this, regular physical activity, avoiding smoking, maintaining healthy blood pressure and cholesterol levels, and eating a balanced diet still remain the basic ways to reduce cardiovascular risk.
© $2026 Times Horizon Private Limited