In the age of social media and quick fix health remedies, viral claims of herbal concoctions which promise to clean the uterus from diseases have grabbed much attention. One such viral claim has made its way through the Instagram reels suggesting that a simple herbal tea, made with red onion and shilajit capsules, removes uterine cysts, fibroids, and even controls the menstrual cycle. How accurate are these claims? Let's dig into the science of these claims, and sort out fact from fiction.

The Instagram reel claims to boil red onion in its skin and drink this concoction empty stomach or just before bed that will cleanse the uterus of cysts, fibroids, and so on. It is also promoting supplementary shilajit capsules. Some videos feature alternative medicine enthusiast Deepak Chopra who is preaching in this video. It promises women results right away-for example, how it can straighten out one's periods, get rid of reproductive health concerns, and other such benefits.

Medical experts refute all these claims vigorously. The uterus, they note, is a self-cleansing organ that doesn't need extraneous assistance to "detoxify" or "cleanse." Such claims lack scientific evidence, and in most cases, it's a matter of misinformation or even manipulated content, at times even generated with the help of AI.

It is important to understand why these claims fall short by grasping the nature of uterine cysts and fibroids.

Cysts

Fluid-filled sacs that develop in different areas, including the ovaries. Ovarian cysts are mainly benign and disappear over time without a need for surgical intervention.

Fibroids

These are abnormal growths found in the uterus. They appear in different sizes and cause the following symptoms; heavy bleeding, pelvic pain among others.

Both have to be diagnosed properly and receive adequate treatment. Medication or surgical methods may occasionally be necessary. Herbal teas and remedies, though helpful for general well-being, do not have the capacity to dissolve cysts or fibroids.

Lack of evidence and adequacy on the use of herbal preparations to the study done on uterine fibroids was concluded. That is, more studies of higher quality are needed to fully understand if herbal remedies can possibly contribute any positive effects on the health of the uterus.

Some medicinal plants and herbs are actually capable of exhibiting anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities; however, their contribution toward addressing issues like those in fibroids and cysts had not yet been proven.

Foods That Can Promote Uterine Health

Although no food or beverage can prevent, eradicate, or kill fibroids or cysts, a healthy diet can be a useful tool in the reduction of possible risk factors and control of symptoms. Foods high in the essential nutrients, antioxidants, and vitamins can have a general benefit for the reproductive organs.

Fruits and Vegetables: Produce such as apples, broccoli, cabbage, tomatoes, and citrus fruits (oranges, lemons, grapefruit) are rich in antioxidants and may reduce the risk of developing fibroids.

Calcium-Rich Foods: Dairy products such as milk, yogurt, and fortified alternatives (soy, almond, or oat milk) are good sources of calcium and vitamin D, which studies suggest may reduce the risk of fibroids.

Vitamin D-Containing Foods: Some of these include light tuna, salmon, and rainbow trout, which provide immune health as well as balance to hormones.

Herbs and Spices for Uterus- Related Ailments

Even though red onion tea and shilajit cannot cleanse the uterus, a few herbs and spices may ease symptoms of disorders such as endometriosis or premenstrual syndrome (PMS).

1. Curcumin: This is a compound found in turmeric that has shown anti-inflammatory effects and may be able to suppress the production of estradiol, a hormone associated with endometriosis.

2. Chamomile: Chamomile tea has been used to alleviate PMS symptoms, and its active compound, chrysin, has been reported to inhibit the growth of endometrial cells.

3. Essential Oils: A combination of cinnamon, clove, rose, and lavender oils applied during aromatherapy massage reduces menstrual pain and bleeding.

4. Ashwagandha: This is an adaptogenic herb used to reduce stress, which can indirectly benefit women with hormonal imbalances or chronic conditions like endometriosis.

While the allure of natural remedies is strong, especially when presented as quick and easy solutions, it’s essential to rely on evidence-based healthcare. Self-diagnosing and experimenting with unproven remedies can delay necessary medical treatment and lead to complications.

Consulting a healthcare provider is critical for accurate diagnosis and tailored treatment plans. Doctors can also provide guidance on incorporating safe and effective complementary therapies into your routine.

There is no scientific basis to support the fact that a simple herbal concoction can cleanse the uterus of "any disease," which misleads the individuals to follow some ineffective remedies. The uterus does not require any kind of external "cleansing" for it to work at its best, and cysts and fibroids are usually treated by proper medical care.

Generally speaking, a proper diet with essential fruits, vegetables, and supplements can help develop overall reproductive well-being, however, it shall not replace other medical treatments and interventions. Also, herbs and plants such as chamomile, turmeric, and ashwagandha have been confirmed to be efficient in treating most related conditions.

Always be up to date, follow trusted health care professionals, and beware of fads that promise miraculous improvements in health with less scientific proof. Your health deserves nothing less.

Herbal preparations for uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009

Curcumin inhibits endometriosis endometrial cells by reducing estradiol production. ran J Reprod Med. 2013

Comparison of the effects of Matricaria chamomila (Chamomile) extract and mefenamic acid on the intensity of premenstrual syndrome. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2014

The effect of aromatherapy abdominal massage on alleviating menstrual pain in nursing students: a prospective randomized cross-over study. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013

A Systematic Review of Human Trial Results Reported for the Ayurvedic Herb Ashwagandha. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 2014

Prolactin and cortisol levels in women with endometriosis. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2006

Eating more ultra-processed food (UPF) has been associated with a higher risk of several chronic health conditions, including cardiovascular disease, cancer, metabolic disorders and high blood pressure.

Yet another large review of studies involving about 9 million participants showed that every additional 100 grams of UPF consumed per day was associated with a 14% higher risk of cardiovascular events and an 11% higher risk of high blood pressure.

This is concerning because cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the world’s leading cause of death. In 2022, an estimated 19.8 million people died from CVDs, accounting for about 32% of all deaths globally. Heart attacks and strokes caused 85% of these deaths, as per data from the WHO.

Uncontrolled blood pressure is also worrying as it is a leading cause of heart attack, stroke, chronic kidney disease, and dementia. An estimated 1.4 billion people lived with hypertension in 2024, yet just over one in five have it under control either through medication or addressing modifiable health risks.

What Did The Study Find?

The findings, published in the open-access journal Family Medicine and Community Health, were based on 51 prospective cohort studies involving 8,819,894 participants across the Americas, Europe, Asia and Oceania.

The researchers found that people with higher UPF consumption had greater risks of several health problems:

• Cardiovascular events: 24% higher risk
• Cancer: 12% higher risk
• Overweight or obesity: 23% higher risk
• Metabolic syndrome or diabetes: 24% higher risk
• Depression or anxiety: 27% higher risk
• Digestive diseases: 31% higher risk
• High blood pressure: 11% higher risk
• Death from any cause: 18% higher risk

The researchers also examined the association with every additional 100 grams of UPF consumed per day. This was associated with:

• 14% higher risk of cardiovascular events
• 4% higher risk of cancer
• 3% higher risk of death from any cause
• 2% higher risk of metabolic syndrome or diabetes

The studies included participants aged 23 to 77 years, with follow-up periods ranging from two to 32 years.

How UPF Affects Heart Health?

The researchers said emerging evidence suggests that exposure to multiple additives in UPFs may have combined effects on health.

Some compounds that can form during food processing, including acrylamide and acrolein, have been associated with cardiovascular disease.

Laboratory research also suggests that the altered physical structure of UPFs may affect the gut microbiome and contribute to inflammation and insulin resistance.

However, the researchers noted that these mechanisms are still being investigated.

“Given that UPF-related chronic diseases often cluster as multi-morbidity, reducing consumption of UPFs and replacing them with minimally processed alternatives may be relevant for chronic disease prevention and primary care management,” the Duke-NUS Medical School researchers said.

What Are Ultra-Processed Foods?

Ultra-processed foods are industrially manufactured products that typically contain ingredients and additives not commonly used in home cooking.

They can include:

• Sugary drinks
• Processed meats
• Packaged snacks and chips
• Candy and confectionery
• Baked goods
• Refined grain products
• Ready-to-eat or ready-to-heat meals

Many UPFs are high in added sugar, sodium, and refined carbohydrates and may contain additives such as emulsifiers, sweeteners, preservatives, colorants and flavor enhancers.

Limit ultra-processed foods to lower risk of heart disease, say experts. Replacing some ultra-processed foods with minimally processed alternatives may therefore be one dietary approach to consider as part of broader chronic disease prevention.

India is actively taking steps towards stricter front-of-pack warnings for packaged foods. The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) is now proposing that a product could be labelled with a red warning even if one nutrient, like salt, sugar or fat, crosses the prescribed limit.

The change marks a shift from FSSAI’s earlier proposal, under which a warning would have been needed only when at least two nutrients crossed their respective thresholds. The latest proposal was submitted to the Supreme Court on Wednesday, September 23.

The rules are not final yet. FSSAI has proposed about four months to finalise the draft regulations, followed by a 365-day voluntary compliance period for food businesses.

How Will The New Warning Appear On Packaging?

Under the proposed system, packaged foods exceeding the specified limits would carry a red hexagonal warning on the front of the pack. The warning would identify the nutrient concerned, such as:

• HIGH SALT
• HIGH SUGAR
• HIGH FAT

If a product crosses the limits for two or three nutrients, the same warning symbol would identify all the applicable nutrients.

The label is proposed to appear prominently on the upper left of the front of the package, with the text larger than the nutrition information printed on the back.

Also read: High Sugar, Salt Or Fat? India May Mandate Red Hexagon Labels On Food Packs

Separate FOPL For Products Containing Non-Caloric Sweetener

FSSAI has also proposed a separate front-of-pack statement for certain products containing non-calorific sweeteners. It stresses that packaged foods and beverages containing non-caloric sweeteners should carry the declaration “CONTAIN NON CALORIC SWEETENER” on the front of the pack.

A LocalCircles survey found that 92% of respondents wanted artificial sweeteners to be prominently disclosed on the front of packaged foods. 41% urban Indian consumers confirm consuming foods with artificial sweeteners every month.

Also read: Synthetic Paneer Whitened With Chuna Busted In Delhi: How Dangerous Is It For Your Health?

Single-Nutrient Warning

Consider a packaged food that is extremely high in sugar but relatively low in salt and fat. Under the earlier two-nutrient approach, that product could have escaped the warning as only one nutrient crossed the threshold. The revised proposal would change that.

The idea is that no product should escape a warning simply because it is high in only one nutrient of concern.

This is a key development as excessive intake of added sugars, sodium and saturated fats is associated with major diet-related health risks. High sodium intake, for example, can contribute to raised blood pressure, while diets high in added sugars can contribute to excess calorie intake and weight gain.

Also read: Cipla's Drug License Cancelled Over Reactin Plus, Then Restored: Why Did Bombay HC Pull Up Maharashtra FDA?

FSSAI’s Key Initiative

A front-of-pack warning is meant to flag specific nutrients that are present above the permitted threshold, rather than declare that the entire food is unhealthy.

A food item could be high in one nutrient while still providing other nutrients like protein, fibre, vitamins or minerals. Conversely, a product without a warning should not automatically be considered as healthy.

FSSAI has proposed using the Dietary Guidelines for Indians, 2024, developed by the ICMR-National Institute of Nutrition, as the basis for the nutrient thresholds.

What About “Healthy” Claims On Packets?

FSSAI’s proposal could also make it easier for consumers to look beyond marketing claims. Words like “multigrain”, “baked” or claims about added vitamins do not necessarily tell consumers how much salt, sugar or fat a product contains.

A prominent warning on the front could bring that information into view before a consumer reaches the detailed nutrition panel on the back.

Just when we thought the widespread protein takeover on almost all foods and drinks had settled, it crept up in the alcoholic beverage industry. Yes, beer may soon be getting a ‘health makeover’.

The world's largest brewer by market value has declared its plans to introduce smaller pack sizes as well as ‘health-ify’ these drinks by adding protein or electrolytes. With this move, the company wants to create a shift in changing consumer preferences amid growing focus on health and wellness.

The company has already launched a version of its Spaten beer that contains added protein in Brazil and now plans to expand low-calorie, zero-alcohol beers with functional ingredients like protein and electrolytes. The company has candidly expressed that wants to increase consumption among people who drink beer occasionally.

The news leaves us with one glaring question: does adding protein or electrolytes actually make an alcoholic drink healthier? To put it simply, it won’t if the drink contains alcohol.

The Era Of Protein In Beer

As most of us know, protein is an essential macronutrient needed to build and strengthen muscles, enzymes, hormones, and repair tissue. Simply adding protein to a beverage can amplify its nutritional value. But doing so with an alcoholic drink like beer does not negate the harmful effects of alcohol.

Alcohol is a psychoactive and toxic substance that threatens the consumer with dependence-inducing properties.

The World Health Organization says alcohol consumption is linked with more than 200 diseases, injuries, and health conditions. Also considered to be carcinogenic, alcohol increases the risk of several cancers, including breast, liver, colorectal and oesophageal cancers.

So a beer containing some additional protein cannot automatically be considered a healthy, protein-rich drink that one can consume regularly. This is because the nutritional value of the added protein has to be considered separately from the risks linked with the alcohol itself.

Also read: US Gen Z, Millennials Are Drinking Less Alcohol For First Time Since COVID-19

Do Electrolytes Make A Difference?

Electrolytes like sodium and potassium can help regulate fluid balance in the body, especially when one is dehydrated.

Electrolyte drinks can be useful in situations when the body loses significant fluid and electrolytes, like prolonged exercise, sweating or certain illnesses. But adding electrolytes to an alcoholic beverage does not make it healthier.

Alcohol increases the production of urine and thus contributes to dehydration. It can disrupt the electrolyte balance in your body even on days when you don’t engage in strenuous exercise.

Therefore, an electrolyte label should not have an alcoholic drink be considered appropriate for hydration.

Also read: BORG Drinking Trend: Why These Viral Alcohol Jugs Can Be Dangerous

Marketing Gimmick To Get More People Drunk

The company, Anheuser-Busch InBev, has openly said it wants to grow beer consumption among occasional drinkers, while simultaneously cashing in on the current health-and-wellness trend with products containing protein, electrolytes and fewer calories.

It may seem to be a harmless tactic, but presenting alcohol alongside words associated with fitness and nutrition could make the product appear healthier than it actually is. The company is simply ‘masking’ its beer to make it more palatable for health-conscious consumers.

This is not the first time an alcohol company has resorted to such marketing gimmicks. They often opt for surrogate marketing, especially in countries where advertising alcohol directly is prohibited.

Dr. Robin Ireland, public health activist and honorary research fellow at the University of Glasgow, UK, told HealthandMe, “Alcohol companies often promote alcohol-free products. In India, I'm aware of surrogate marketing, where alcohol companies produce packaged drinking water using the same brand, colourway and distribution networks. So it's hardly surprising these brands are normalised to young people. Even where alcohol advertising is banned, alcohol can still be heavily promoted.”

This does not mean the company's intention is to deliberately mislead consumers. But the poorly-placed combination of wellness language and an alcoholic product can blur an important health boundary.

Hence, it is crucial to remember that adding a beneficial nutrient does not eliminate the harm associated with ethanol.

WHO warns that there is no risk-free level of alcohol consumption. It says that the health risk comes from the alcohol itself, regardless of the type or quality of the drink.

Can Labelling Help?

One may argue that alcohol companies will do the ethical thing and disclose all the nutritional facts on the packaging. But it’s not a guarantee that everyone will read the information diligently and make the healthy choice.

Dr. Ireland said, “Labelling helps, but it's only part of the solution. Not everybody has the time or resources to read labels, and people will still buy what they can afford and what is accessible.”

As alcohol companies have resorted borrow the language of wellness to influence consumer behaviour, people should learn to look beyond the front-of-pack claims and ask the simplest question first: How much alcohol does it contain?