Weight loss, to feel healthier, to prepare for a specific event, or just as a boost in the fitness journey, is on most people's bucket list. Rapid weight loss does need to be approached with care because of potential health risks. In that case, five of the well-researched diets from U.S. News & World Report on Best Diets can be of help in losing pounds efficiently in 2025.
Even when aiming for rapid results, balance and nutrition are key. Structure your meals as follows:
Rapid weight loss may be beneficial to people who face health issues, such as diabetes, high blood pressure, or high cholesterol. In this regard, when their BMI is greater than 30, the very low-calorie diet may be recommended by physicians. These VLCDs may help in controlling risks and facilitating a healthier weight, which further minimizes the chances of suffering from severe conditions, including postmenopausal breast cancer and colon cancer.
For others, rapid weight loss may serve as a motivational impetus but should be balanced with efficacy and sustainability. A healthcare provider should be consulted before beginning any weight loss program.
The Jenny Craig Diet is a highly structured meal program that provides clients with prepackaged, portion-controlled foods to manage calorie intake while teaching them healthy eating habits. This also includes the practice of intermittent fasting for better effects.
One thing that differentiates Jenny Craig is one-on-one coaching. Members receive individualized advice on the timing of meals, portion control, and balanced eating, leading to sustainable weight loss. The average weight loss for participants is 1–2 pounds per week, which makes it a very practical approach for people seeking steady, fast results.
The ketogenic diet, or keto, emphasizes high-fat and low-carb foods to induce ketosis, a state where the body burns fat for energy. This approach leads to significant weight loss, especially in the initial stages.
Beyond weight loss, keto is also said to improve mental acuity, energy, and stabilization of blood sugar. However, the diet's strictness comes at a great cost. Fattening avocado, fatty fish, nuts, and lean proteins are the stars, while carbohydrates in the form of bread, pasta, and sugar are banished.
For individuals who want a convenient, time-saving diet, SlimFast offers effective meal replacement solutions in the form of shakes, bars, and smoothies. It is great for losing up to 20 pounds, meaning participants can get to their goals in 8–10 weeks.
While convenient, it's important to balance other meals with nutrient-rich foods in order to avoid deficiencies. SlimFast is ideal for a busy person who cannot find time for meal planning but wants to lose weight rapidly.
WeightWatchers, recently branded as WW, combines the strengths of behavioral science, nutrition, and technology into a total solution for weight loss. In their point system, users get the freedom to choose from hundreds of foods.
WW is more than a weight loss program, offering programs designed for people with diabetes or those on GLP-1 drugs like Ozempic. The program is comprehensive with a strong app, recipes, and support groups, making it accessible and effective.
The Volumetrics Diet flips the conventional diet on its head, focusing on low-calorie-density foods that are high in nutrients. Think fruits, vegetables, broth-based soups, and whole grains. Participants eat filling, water-rich foods, so they consume fewer calories while still feeling satisfied.
Volumetrics isn't a restriction diet but rather a lifestyle, teaching one portion control and how to eat. It's not a diet, as most of the ingredients can be sourced at any local grocery store.
Also Read: 20-Minute At-Home Pilates To Tone Up And Burn Fat
Though effective diets, rapid weight loss comes with its challenges:
Many rapid plans will initially cause water loss, which is sure to return after the normal eating habit is resumed.
Fad diets will always create an urge to consume and hinder one's ability to stick to a diet for long periods of time.
Eliminating specific food groups entirely can lead to the omission of necessary vitamins and minerals.
These three challenges can be overcome by focusing on rapid weight loss as the stepping stone to good lifestyle changes. This should be complemented with exercise, mindful eating, and stress management to sustain progress.
Quick diets may be a great starting point, but sustainable lifestyle habits are essential for long-term success. These include regular exercise, balanced nutrition, and control of stressors. All of these can maintain a healthy weight.
In any case, all these diets focus on achieving one goal- that of general wellness. Begin small, and create a base upon which to sustain long-term outcomes.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and should not replace medical advice. Consult a healthcare professional before starting any diet, especially if you have preexisting health conditions.
Credits: Canva
Vitamin D and calcium, both are nutrients you body needs to function well. While both are different nutrients, often many people get confused because vitamin D and calcium both are important for strong bones. Lack of both could lead to an increased risk of osteoporosis or bone fracture.
However, these two nutrients are different, react differently to your body and works differently too. The sources too could be different. Let us understand how.
As per WebMD, here are the following vitamin D rich food items:
However, there is one source, often recommended as the best and natural source, that is the exposure to sun. In this case too, one must keep in mind the sun burn, as it could cause skin problems, including skin cancer.
Beverages like milk, orange juice, yogurt, cereals too often have vitamin D added into them.
As per the Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation, calcium is a mineral that builds and maintains dense, strong bones, while Vitamin D is a hormone that enables the body to absorb that calcium from food. Calcium also assists with nerve, muscle, and vascular functions, whereas Vitamin D is primarily responsible for calcium regulation.
Role: Calcium is a building block for bones and teeth; Vitamin D is the "key" that unlocks calcium absorption.
Definition: Calcium is a mineral (found in dairy, leafy greens); Vitamin D is a fat-soluble nutrient/hormone.
Source: Calcium comes from diet, while Vitamin D is produced by the skin via sun exposure in addition to food sources.
Deficiency Symptoms: Low calcium can lead to weak bones (osteoporosis). Low Vitamin D can cause soft bones (rickets in children) and prevents calcium absorption.
Credits: Canva
Dr. Dominik Nischwitz, a dentist based in Germany, highlights on his Instagram that organ meats like liver are a nutrient-dense food, calling them "nature's multivitamin via real food," and suggests that eating organs was historically "prized & classed as a real luxury". His perspective aligns with how predators in the wild often prioritize organs like the brain, heart, and bone marrow over muscle meat.
A key reason for this prioritization is the immense concentration of nutrients in organs, which are essential for running "EVERY biochemical process in the human body especially your metabolism".
He has also posted on his Instagram @drdome1, comparing chicken liver with chicken breast. The post noted that chicken breast has 165cals per 100grams, while liver has 167cals per 100grams. However, the chicken breast has 0% vitamin A, 0% vitamin C, 1% folate, and 6% vitamin B12. Whereas, he noted that chicken liver has 267% vitamin A, 47% vitamin C, 144% folate, and 281% vitamin B12.
Chicken liver is significantly richer in numerous vitamins compared to chicken breast, offering a high percentage of the daily value (DV) for several B vitamins and Vitamin A.
Vitamin B12: Chicken liver has a massive amount of Vitamin B12, providing 675% more of the daily needs compared to chicken breast. Per 100 grams, chicken liver contains 16.58 μg of Vitamin B12, while chicken breast only has 0.37 μg.
Vitamin A: Chicken liver is an exceptional source of Vitamin A, containing 482 times more than chicken breast. Per 100 grams, chicken liver has 11,078 IU of Vitamin A, compared to 23 IU in chicken breast. This high content is necessary for various processes in the body, including those that regulate metabolism.
Other B Vitamins and Folate: The liver is loaded with all B vitamins. Specifically, per 100 grams, chicken liver has more Vitamin B2 (1.778 mg vs. 0.125 mg), Vitamin B5 (6.233 mg vs. 1.04 mg), and Folate (588 μg vs. 4 μg). These are crucial, for example, with B2 helping make FAD for fatty acid utilization, and B3 needed to make NAD+.
While chicken liver excels in these vitamins, the one exception is Vitamin B3, which chicken breast is richer in.
In addition to vitamins, chicken liver is a standout source of key minerals.
Iron: Chicken liver contains 8.99 mg of Iron per 100 grams, which is significantly more than chicken breast's 1.14 mg. This represents a 688.6% increase in Iron content for the liver.
Copper and Selenium: The liver is an excellent source of Copper. Chicken liver has 0.492 mg of Copper, substantially more than the 0.054 mg in chicken breast. It also contains more Selenium (54.6 μg vs. 26.2 μg). The presence of copper is important for how the body handles oxygen.
Zinc and Manganese: Compared to chicken breast, chicken liver is richer in Zinc and Manganese, showing a 147.2% and 1114.3% increase, respectively, in these minerals.
Fats and Cholesterol: Although chicken liver has more beneficial nutrients, it also contains more Cholesterol (345 mg per 100g) than chicken breast (91 mg per 100g).
While chicken breast is generally a better source of protein (33.44 g vs. 16.92 g per 100g), chicken liver is still considered a "VERY good source of protein" and is "VERY cost effective". Calorie content is very similar, with raw chicken liver at 119 kcal per 100g and cooked chicken breast at 187 kcal per 100g.
The notion that liver stores toxins is a "bogus claim." In a healthy animal, the liver's function is to transport and remove toxins from circulation, moving them to "less important and energetic tissue such as adipocytes (fat cells)". Historically, humans consumed the whole bird or animal, including the carcass for bone broth, indicating a shift in modern eating habits toward only muscle meat like chicken breast.
Credit: Pixabay
Edible cactus, especially varieties from the genus Opuntia, has moved far beyond traditional cuisine and into the world of functional foods. Often eaten as cactus pads known as cladodes or as the fruit called prickly pear, this plant has been studied for its possible benefits in diabetes, cholesterol management and overall metabolic health.
But how strong is the evidence? Here is a clear and scientific look at what research says:
The most commonly studied species is Opuntia ficus-indica, widely consumed in Mexico and other arid regions. According to 2011 Journal of Food Science and Technology study, cactus cladodes are rich in dietary fiber, antioxidants, vitamins and minerals.
A 2025 Scientific Reports study also shows that cactus pear accessions contain bioactive compounds such as polyphenols, betalains, and flavonoids, which may help prevent chronic illnesses like cancer, diabetes and cardiovascular diseases, while supporting immune function, gut health and cognitive health.
Another 2021 Food Chemistry study describes cactus species as underutilized plants with strong nutritional potential. They are particularly high in soluble fiber which are important for blood sugar and cholesterol regulation.
A 2022 Medicina study reviewed the use of prickly pear cladodes as a functional ingredient for hyperglycemia management and found evidence suggesting that consuming cactus pads with meals may reduce fasting glucose levels.
Normal postprandial (post-meal) blood sugar for adults without diabetes is typically below 140 mg/dL two hours after eating. For individuals with diabetes, the target is generally less than 180 mg/dL.
A systematic review by a 2019 Medicina study examined human trials on Opuntia consumption and found reductions in blood glucose and insulin levels, especially in individuals with Type 2 diabetes. However, the results were not entirely consistent across all trials.
More recent analytical research by the Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry suggests that cactus bioactive compounds may inhibit enzymes such as alpha-glucosidase and alpha-amylase, both key digestive enzymes that work sequentially to break down starch into glucose in the body.
These enzymes are involved in carbohydrate digestion. By slowing their activity, cactus components may reduce the speed at which glucose enters the bloodstream, suggetsing that cactus may help the body handle carbohydrates more gradually.
A Nutrition review and meta-analysis conducted randomized clinical trials on cactus pear and cardiovascular risk factors. They found significant reductions in body weight and some lipid parameters, though the overall quality of evidence varied.
Another 2024 Nutrition study also highlighted the potential of Opuntia species in managing obesity and related metabolic conditions, including dyslipidemia. Some studies reported reductions in total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol, particularly in individuals with metabolic syndrome.
However, the magnitude of these changes is generally described as moderate rather than dramatic.
Many studies involve small sample sizes. Some trials are short-term. Preparation methods also vary widely, from fresh cladodes to powders, extracts, or capsules. Dosage differences make it difficult to compare results directly.
In addition, cactus should not be viewed as a replacement for medical treatment. For individuals with diabetes or high cholesterol, it may be a supportive dietary addition rather than a standalone therapy.
However, the improvements observed in studies are generally modest. Cactus works best as part of an overall balanced diet rich in fiber, whole grains, fruits, vegetables, and healthy fats.
In summary, edible cactus is not a miracle cure, but it is a scientifically interesting and nutritionally valuable food. As research continues, especially with better-designed human trials, we may gain clearer answers about how strong its metabolic benefits truly are.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited