Credits: Canva
The clothes you wear when you work out may do you more harm than helping you to stay healthy as you hit the gym. This is because research has revealed alarming levels of bisphenol A (BPA), a chemical compound linked to significant health risks in several sports wear, including sports bra, leggings, and athletic wear. The Center for Environmental Health (CEH), which is a nonprofit consumer advocacy group has brought these concerns to light, and have raised awareness about the potential danger and damage these sports wear can cause because of the common chemicals used.
Bisphenol A, or BPA is a chemical that is used to make plastics and resins. It is also used in certain fabrics and is known for its endocrine-disrupting properties, which can also interfere with one's hormonal balance. There have been studies, including a 2019 study titled The adverse health effects of bisphenol A and related toxicity mechanisms that have linked BPA exposure to various health problems, including asthma, cardiovascular diseases, obesity, diabetes, and even cancer.
Many of research which have been conducted focus on the ingestion, which can happen when you store food in BPA-lined containers. Among them, some of the more recent studies show that skin absorption is also a pathway. This means when you are handling receipts which are printed on thermal paper, or wear BPA-containing fabrics, the chemical can seep through your skin and enter your bloodstream.
Though it is also true that BPA is exposed from the body within days, however, continuous exposure from multiple sources can be concerning.
CEH also tested popular athletic wear in October 2023 and found BPA levels were exceeding California's safety standards by as much as 22 times.
Testing also showed that top brands contained up to 40 times the permissible limit of BPA.
As far as laws are concerned, under California's Proposition 65, the maximum allowable dose for BPA exposure via skin is 3 micrograms per day. While this law is among the strictest in the United States, it highlights a broader issue of chemical safety in consumer products nationwide.
Ana Soto, an immunologist with decades of research on BPA, even low doses of dermal and oral exposure can combine to create a significant health risk. She also warned that prolonged exposure through fabric, especially when you are exercising, as your pores are open and sweat is present, can in fact, amplify these effects.
BPA can disrupt your body's endocrine system, which is a network of glands and organs that produce hormones that control many bodily functions. These include growth and development, metabolism, and reproduction, to name a few. BPA can mimic natural hormones like estrogen and interfere in those bodily functions.
Studies also link it with obesity and diabetes, respiratory issues, especially asthma risk in school-aged children, cardiovascular diseases, and cancer risks.
There are certain steps you can follow to protect yourself:
Credits: Canva
Every year on March 20, World Oral Health Day is observed to raise awareness about the importance of caring for your mouth at every stage of life. This means starting from birth through later years. However, a visit to dentist is usually the last thing anyone plans when they think of a doctor's visit. Dental visits happen only when extraction or something bigger is involved. More often than not people ignore a follow up or a regular dental checkup to maintain oral health. Why so?
In a previous interview with Health and Me Lt Gen Dr Vimal Arora, the Chief Clinical officer at Clove Dental, who has 40 years of experience as a dentist and also served in the Indian Army explained how oral health is not just about a pretty smile. He explained that many do not plan a regular visit to a dentist because the problems that pertains to oral health do not seem "life threatening".
Read: Exclusive: Astronaut Rakesh Sharma Had To Get His Wisdom Tooth Extracted Before His Trip To Space
However, Dr Arora told Health and Me that oral health can in fact be the first way to know if anyone is prone to a chronic disease.
“There is now scientific evidence, published in top medical journals, that shows how oral infections can significantly worsen pre-existing systemic diseases,” says Dr. Arora. This isn’t just a theory — it’s a medically established fact.
Take diabetes, for instance. People with gum infections often find it harder to control their blood sugar levels. “If you're suffering from diabetes and you have a gum infection, your diabetes will not be well controlled. In fact, it may worsen,” he adds. The same applies to heart diseases. Oral infections can increase inflammation in the body, potentially triggering or worsening cardiovascular problems.
This is concerning especially for those people who may already be managing conditions like hypertensions, arthritis, or respiratory illness. Poor oral health can actually sabotage their efforts to stay stable.
“Your tongue is a true mirror of your oral and general health,” says Dr. Arora. The correlation therefore goes beyond just gums and teeth. Dentists are trained to detect early signs of systemic disorders simply by examining the tongue's color, coating and texture.
A pale tongue might indicate iron deficiency, while a coated tongue could be a sign of digestive issues or a viral illness. “Sometimes, we ask patients if they've had their blood work done, based purely on what we see on their tongue,” he adds. In some cases, dentists can even detect undiagnosed diabetes or early signs of nutritional deficiencies.
Dr. Arora also highlights the overlooked risks that pregnant women face when they neglect their dental hygiene. “If you are pregnant and suffer from periodontitis or even gingivitis — essentially poor gum health — you are at risk of having a preterm or low-birth-weight baby,” he says.
This isn’t just theory; it’s a well-documented risk in obstetric dentistry. Pregnant women are encouraged to get dental check-ups not just for themselves, but for the health of their unborn child.
Despite these evidences, oral health remains one of the most neglected aspects of personal healthcare. Dr. Arora believes this is partly due to a lack of awareness and the perception that dental problems are not "serious enough."
“People often wait until they’re in pain before they see a dentist, but by then, the damage might already be affecting other parts of the body,” he says. Preventive check-ups, regular cleaning, and treating gum infections early on can go a long way in improving not just oral health, but overall wellness.
Credits: Canva
Most people reach for sunscreen when heading to the beach or stepping out for a long day in the sun. But skincare experts say sun protection should not be limited to vacations or outdoor activities. Sunscreen is meant to be part of a daily skincare routine.
This often raises a common question. If you are staying indoors all day, do you still need sunscreen?
Dermatologists say the answer depends on your surroundings and daily habits.
Many people assume that staying inside completely protects their skin from sunlight. But this is not always true.
Dr Khushboo Jha, MBBS, MD, Chief Dermatologist Consultant at Metro Hospital and Founder of One Skin Clinic, explains that sunlight entering through windows can still affect the skin.
“While standard window glass blocks most UVB rays, which cause sunburn, UVA rays can still pass through. These rays penetrate deeper into the skin and are linked to long term concerns such as premature aging, uneven pigmentation and loss of skin elasticity,” she says.
These UVA rays are often overlooked because they do not cause immediate redness or burning like UVB rays. However, over time they can lead to visible signs of skin aging and pigmentation.
Dermatologists say sunscreen indoors is particularly useful for people who spend long hours near windows or in well lit spaces.
Dr Jha notes that individuals who work near windows, sit in sunlit rooms or spend time driving during the day may still be exposed to sunlight. “Even short periods of daily exposure to sunlight over time can contribute to cumulative skin damage,” she explains.
In such situations, applying sunscreen in the morning can offer an added layer of protection. A broad spectrum sunscreen with at least SPF 30 is generally recommended.
This approach is especially relevant for people working in offices with large windows or those who frequently commute during daylight hours.
Experts also say sunscreen use indoors is not always equally necessary for everyone.
If you spend most of the day inside a room with minimal natural light and away from windows, your exposure to ultraviolet radiation becomes much lower.
Dr Jha says that in such cases the urgency of frequent sunscreen reapplication becomes less important. The risk of sun related skin damage is significantly reduced when there is little to no direct daylight entering the space.
This means sunscreen indoors should not be treated as a strict rule but rather as a flexible part of skincare based on lifestyle and environment.
Another topic that often comes up is blue light exposure from digital devices such as phones, laptops and tablets.
Some studies suggest that prolonged exposure to visible light may contribute to pigmentation, especially in individuals with deeper skin tones. However, dermatologists point out that the amount of blue light from electronic screens is much lower than what we receive from natural sunlight.
Dr Jha says the effect of digital screens on the skin is still being studied, but compared to sun exposure, the impact remains minimal.
Dermatologists suggest viewing sunscreen as a preventive skincare habit rather than a rigid rule.
Dr Jha recommends incorporating sunscreen into your morning routine, particularly if your day includes stepping outdoors or spending time in naturally lit environments.
In simple terms, if daylight reaches your workspace or you plan to go outside later in the day, applying sunscreen in the morning is a small step that can help protect your skin over time.
Credits: ABC News' Four Corners
At the age of 28, Courtney Paton realized she could never have children. She was medically infertile. This was after years of repeated surgeries, a total of seven, for 'suspected' endometriosis, due to which Dr Simon Gordon, Melbourne-based gynecologist removed both her ovaries and eventually her uterus.
Also Read: Menopause Can Raise Alzheimer Risk In Women, Neurologist Warns
Her story came to light through an investigation by the Australian Broadcasting Company or ABC's Four Corners, an investigation that looked at the treatment she received from Dr Gordon.
Courtney says she trusted the doctor completely. Now she says that trust has been shattered. “I feel completely betrayed by not only Simon Gordon, but by Epworth, by the healthcare system,” she told the program.
Courtney first had laparoscopic surgery in 2018 with another surgeon, which confirmed she had endometriosis. The condition affects about one in seven Australian women and can cause severe pelvic pain and fertility problems.
Still struggling with pain, she began seeing Gordon in 2019 when she was 21.
Over the next several years she underwent seven surgeries with him. Gordon told her the procedures were necessary to treat severe endometriosis. Courtney and her family paid more than 32,000 Australian dollars for these surgeries alone.
But when investigators asked her to obtain her pathology reports, the results told a very different story. The tissue tests from most of her surgeries showed no evidence of endometriosis.
Despite this, operation reports written by Gordon continued to describe findings consistent with the disease.
Read: A Woman Lost Her Ovary To Endometriosis Surgery After Receiving An Ultimatum From Gynecologist
In 2021 Gordon removed one of Courtney’s ovaries, saying it was stuck to the pelvic wall. Later he removed the second ovary as well.
Independent specialists who reviewed the pathology for the investigation said the ovary appeared normal and there was no clear justification for removing it. One expert described the treatment as “unbelievable” after reviewing the medical records.
Medical guidelines generally advise caution when removing ovaries from young women who may want children in the future.
Despite losing both ovaries, Courtney continued to experience pelvic pain. Gordon later advised that she should undergo a hysterectomy.
Concerned, she sought a second opinion from another gynecologist who said the procedure was unnecessary and suggested non surgical treatments.
But after years of pain and repeated surgeries, Courtney says she felt desperate for relief and trusted the doctor who had treated her for so long. Her uterus was removed in 2023 when she was just 25.
Again, pathology results found no evidence of endometriosis.
Courtney is now pursuing legal action through a medical negligence claim. The case has also drawn attention from regulators, with investigations underway into Gordon’s conduct.
Australia’s federal health minister Mark Butler described the allegations as “physically sickening”.
For Courtney, the emotional impact remains overwhelming.
“No woman should ever have to endure what I’ve endured,” she said. “I’ve had the opportunity to have a family taken away from me.”
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited