Credits: Canva
We all must have come across the phase: this is why women live longer than men. These are all over the social media, where men are performing more often than not, some experiments, without gears, just for fun, "in the name of science". The caption reads: this is why women live longer. However, is there really a science to it, other than the fact that women choose to do things more safely?
In the United States, women have a life expectancy of about 80, whereas men have 75. Women outlive men and this holds true regardless of the country women live, the money they make, and other factors. In fact, it is true for most other mammals too.
Dr Dena Dubal, a professor of neurology at the University of California, San Francisco told the New York Times, "It is a very robust phenomenon all over the world, totally conserved in sickness, during famines, during epidemics, even during the times of starvation."
But what are the reasons? These reasons are often more complicated and less established. It is important to note that only because women are outliving men does not mean they are living a better life. In fact, women tend to have shorter health spans, which means the number of healthy years in a person's life is less in women than men, confirmed Bérénice Benayoun, an associate professor at the U.S.C. Leonard Davis School of Gerontology.
As per a 2021 study titled, Sex differences in frailty: Comparisons between humans and preclinical models, found that women are more physically grail than men in old age. They are also more vulnerable, especially after menopause and are at more risk of developing cardiovascular issues and Alzheimer's disease because of age.
The key is in figuring out what makes one sex more resilient or vulnerable.
For things which do not find easy explanations, scientists look for their answers in genes. Many research, including a 2020 study titled, The sex with the reduced sex chromosome dies earlier: a comparison across the tree of life, suggests that the XX set of female sex chromosomes may impact longevity. However, there has not been any clarity on how it affects longevity.
Another 2018 study titled, Female XX sex chromosomes increase survival and extend lifespan in aging mice, which was conducted by Dr Dubal's lab, looked at genetically manipulated mice with different combinations of sex chromosomes and reproductive organs. It was found that those with two X chromosomes and ovaries lived longest, followed by mice with two X chromosomes and testes. Mice with XY chromosomes had shorter life spans.
"There was something about the second X chromosome that was protecting the mice from dying earlier in life, even if they had testes. What if there was something on that second X chromosome that was in some ways a sprinkle of the fountain of youth," says Dr Dubal. While scientists have not yet looked at this factor in humans, Dr Dubal suggests that humans have the same hormones and sex chromosomes, and similar reproductive system that could corroborate the similar findings in people.
Plenty research has shown that estrogen is responsible for longevity also effect on the immune system. The data also shows that before menopause, the female immune system tends to do better. In fact Dr Benayoun said that males tend to do much worse in response to infection.
Another 2017 study titled, Ages at Menarche and Menopause and Reproductive Lifespan As Predictors of Exceptional Longevity in Women: The Women's Health Initiative, found that women who experienced menopause later in life over the age 50 lived longer than those who experienced it earlier.
There are also disparity in behavioral patterns between men and women. This includes smoking, drinking heavily, which can contribute significantly to mortality. Women also have more "health promoting behavior", believe experts. Women are also more likely to socialize than men and thus it protects them from detrimental effects of social isolation and loneliness. In fact, a 2023 analysis published in Jama Network, titled, Widening Gender Gap in Life Expectancy in the US, 2010-2021, found that women are less likely to die by drug overdose or suicide.
Credit: iStock
Non-healing mouth sores are often brushed off as minor issues, but when they persist for more than two weeks, they can signal something more serious.
Mouth ulcers are common and are often caused by stress, minor injuries, or nutritional deficiencies. Sores that do not heal may indicate underlying health concerns, particularly oral cancer.
"Early-stage oral cancers can present as painless ulcers or patches inside the mouth, making them easy to overlook. Conditions like Oral Cancer, Leukoplakia, or Lichen Planus may initially appear as harmless lesions but can progress if left unchecked," Dr. Mandeep Singh Malhotra, Director – Surgical Oncology at the CK Birla Hospital, Delhi, told HealthandMe.
Dr. Tejinder Kataria, Chairperson - Radiation Oncology, Medanta Hospital, Gurugram, added that mouth sores that don't go away after two to three weeks could be an early sign of oral cancer.
"These sores can be red or white and hurt or bleed easily. This is not the same as regular ulcers," he told HealthandMe.
The experts noted that non-healing sores can also be associated with systemic conditions such as
What Is Oral Cancer?
Also read: CDC Delay In Infant Hepatitis B Shots May Surge Infections, Deaths In US: Research
Oral cancer is a wide term for cancer that affects the inside of your mouth, and it typically presents itself as white patches or sores that bleed. It can occur on the:
It is estimated that about 60,000 new cases of oral cancer are reported annually in India, and five people die from the condition every hour. It is the most common cancer in Indian men and the third most common in women, with roughly 20 in 100,000 people affected.
Oral cancer grows slowly, and the first signs usually don't hurt, so a lot of people don't notice them. However, it's important to look out for
Early diagnosis plays a crucial role in effective treatment. If a mouth sore persists, grows, or is accompanied by pain, bleeding, or difficulty swallowing, it is important to consult a healthcare professional promptly. Paying attention to such small signs can make a significant difference in long-term health outcomes.
Credit: iStock
Knee replacement surgery has witnessed remarkable advancements over the past few years. Traditionally, total knee replacement was performed as a uniform procedure ("one procedure fits all"), where the entire knee joint was replaced regardless of the extent or location of damage.
However, with the evolution of modern orthopedics, the focus has shifted towards precision and personalized treatment. In this direction, an A La Carte or Modular approach towards patients who need knee Replacement has emerged, which customizes or personalizes the surgery according to the patient’s specific condition.
The term “à la carte” refers to selecting individual items from a menu. In knee replacement surgery, it means replacing only the damaged portion of the joint instead of the entire knee.
The knee is anatomically divided into three compartments:
In many patients suffering from osteoarthritis, the disease affects only one or two of these compartments—most commonly the medial compartment. In such cases, replacing the entire knee may not be necessary. Modular implants allow surgeons to selectively treat the affected area while preserving healthy bone and ligaments.
The à la carte technique helps preserve the natural structure of the knee while effectively treating only the damaged portion, resulting in better and more natural functional outcomes for patients.
However, this approach is not suitable for all patients. It is generally not recommended in inflammatory conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis.
In Total Knee Replacement (TKR), all three compartments of the knee are replaced, making it an effective solution for advanced and widespread arthritis.
In contrast, Modular Knee Replacement offers a more targeted approach:
This selective treatment helps maintain the knee’s natural structure and function.
For carefully selected patients, this technique offers several important benefits:
Not every patient is suitable for this procedure. Proper patient selection is one of the most critical factors in ensuring the success of this procedure. Ideal candidates typically include people:
When performed in the right patient, modular knee replacement delivers excellent long-term outcomes (90 to 95 per cent survivorship for 15 years). Its success largely depends on accurate patient selection and flawless surgical expertise.
In some cases, if arthritis progresses in the remaining compartments over time, conversion to total knee replacement can still be done. However, this is relatively uncommon when proper indications are followed.
Robotic-assisted surgery has further enhanced the precision of this technique. It enables:
Conclusion
Ala Carte or Modular Knee Replacement represents a significant shift toward personalized orthopaedic care. Instead of a "one-size-fits-all " approach, surgeons can now tailor treatment based on the patient’s anatomy and disease pattern.
For many patients, this means less invasive surgery, faster recovery, improved function, and a more natural-feeling knee. Individuals experiencing persistent knee pain are advised to consult an orthopaedic specialist early to determine the most appropriate treatment option.
Credit: Canva
Beyond lung cancers, air pollution fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is increasing mortality for breast as well as liver cancers, according to a global study led by the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC), including researchers from the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR).
The important study showed that long-term exposure to PM2.5 increases the overall risk of developing cancer and the chances of dying from it compared with those living in cleaner environments.
For every 10 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m³) increase in PM2.5 exposure, the overall risk of cancers increases by more than 11 per cent. At the same time, the risk of death also increases by more than 12 per cent for every 10 µg/m³ increase in PM2.5 exposure.
The researchers argued that while other common risk factors like tobacco and alcohol are being targeted with notable progress, air pollution is silently eroding the gains being made.
“We have made huge strides in reducing deaths from cancer, but polluted air is silently undermining that progress. It is a risk people cannot opt out of, and one that disproportionately affects women, children, and people living in poverty,” Cary Adams, CEO, UICC.
“The cancer community continues to make progress in addressing other major risk factors, including tobacco use, alcohol consumption, and viral, bacterial, or parasitic infections such as HPV and HBV that cause cervical and liver cancers. It is increasingly clear that air pollution must also be recognized as a major and preventable factor that increases the risk of developing cancer and of dying from the disease,” added Dr Elisabete Weiderpass, Director, IARC.
The study, based on data from 42 meta-analyses and systematic reviews published between 2019 and 2024, showed significantly strong associations for liver, colorectal, and breast cancers.
As per recent data from the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), PM₂.₅ exposure contributes to 434,000 lung cancers per year, accounting for more than a quarter of preventable lung cancers in women and nearly one in six in men.
In addition to lung cancer risk, the study noted that the rising levels of PM2.5 are associated with

According to the researchers, people living in low- and middle-income countries bear the greatest overall burden. These countries frequently lack the resources to reduce pollution at source or to provide timely access to cancer prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.
The challenge is compounded by the projected rise in global cancer cases, expected to increase from 20 million in 2022 to 35 million by 2050. People at risk include:
The researchers underscored that the evidence presented in the report is already sufficient to justify decisive action to reduce exposure to polluted air. They called upon policymakers to make required changes across energy, transport, industry, and urban planning to reduce the risk of cancer from air pollution.
The study urged the need for properly implementing effective interventions that are well-established. These include:
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited