Credits: Canva
We all must have come across the phase: this is why women live longer than men. These are all over the social media, where men are performing more often than not, some experiments, without gears, just for fun, "in the name of science". The caption reads: this is why women live longer. However, is there really a science to it, other than the fact that women choose to do things more safely?
In the United States, women have a life expectancy of about 80, whereas men have 75. Women outlive men and this holds true regardless of the country women live, the money they make, and other factors. In fact, it is true for most other mammals too.
Dr Dena Dubal, a professor of neurology at the University of California, San Francisco told the New York Times, "It is a very robust phenomenon all over the world, totally conserved in sickness, during famines, during epidemics, even during the times of starvation."
But what are the reasons? These reasons are often more complicated and less established. It is important to note that only because women are outliving men does not mean they are living a better life. In fact, women tend to have shorter health spans, which means the number of healthy years in a person's life is less in women than men, confirmed Bérénice Benayoun, an associate professor at the U.S.C. Leonard Davis School of Gerontology.
As per a 2021 study titled, Sex differences in frailty: Comparisons between humans and preclinical models, found that women are more physically grail than men in old age. They are also more vulnerable, especially after menopause and are at more risk of developing cardiovascular issues and Alzheimer's disease because of age.
The key is in figuring out what makes one sex more resilient or vulnerable.
For things which do not find easy explanations, scientists look for their answers in genes. Many research, including a 2020 study titled, The sex with the reduced sex chromosome dies earlier: a comparison across the tree of life, suggests that the XX set of female sex chromosomes may impact longevity. However, there has not been any clarity on how it affects longevity.
Another 2018 study titled, Female XX sex chromosomes increase survival and extend lifespan in aging mice, which was conducted by Dr Dubal's lab, looked at genetically manipulated mice with different combinations of sex chromosomes and reproductive organs. It was found that those with two X chromosomes and ovaries lived longest, followed by mice with two X chromosomes and testes. Mice with XY chromosomes had shorter life spans.
"There was something about the second X chromosome that was protecting the mice from dying earlier in life, even if they had testes. What if there was something on that second X chromosome that was in some ways a sprinkle of the fountain of youth," says Dr Dubal. While scientists have not yet looked at this factor in humans, Dr Dubal suggests that humans have the same hormones and sex chromosomes, and similar reproductive system that could corroborate the similar findings in people.
Plenty research has shown that estrogen is responsible for longevity also effect on the immune system. The data also shows that before menopause, the female immune system tends to do better. In fact Dr Benayoun said that males tend to do much worse in response to infection.
Another 2017 study titled, Ages at Menarche and Menopause and Reproductive Lifespan As Predictors of Exceptional Longevity in Women: The Women's Health Initiative, found that women who experienced menopause later in life over the age 50 lived longer than those who experienced it earlier.
There are also disparity in behavioral patterns between men and women. This includes smoking, drinking heavily, which can contribute significantly to mortality. Women also have more "health promoting behavior", believe experts. Women are also more likely to socialize than men and thus it protects them from detrimental effects of social isolation and loneliness. In fact, a 2023 analysis published in Jama Network, titled, Widening Gender Gap in Life Expectancy in the US, 2010-2021, found that women are less likely to die by drug overdose or suicide.
Credit: iStock
Stroke is a medical emergency, but in some patients, it may also be the first sign of an undiagnosed cancer, said top Neurologist Dr. Vinit Suri on World Stroke Day.
In an exclusive interview with HealthandMe for World Stroke Day, Dr. Suri, Senior Consultant Neurologist and Academic Coordinator at Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi, explains the link between cancer and stroke, the warning signs that need urgent attention, and how patients can reduce their risk.
He noted that cancer and its treatment can also increase stroke risk, while a stroke may sometimes prompt doctors to investigate an underlying malignancy.
The noted expert also highlighted warning signs which may point to an underlying malignancy, and how cancer patients can reduce their risk and manage recovery.
Dr Suri said cancer and stroke can overlap in three ways: cancer patients may have conventional risk factors such as hypertension and diabetes; cancer itself can increase blood clotting; and certain treatments can raise stroke risk.
“Cancer patients have double the risk of having a stroke compared to their age-matched individuals,” Dr Suri said.
He estimated that 10% to 15% of stroke patients may have cancer or cancer treatment as the underlying cause. Sometimes, a stroke is the first sign of an undiagnosed malignancy, known as a sentinel stroke. Thus, identifying the cause is important to prevent recurrent strokes.
Dr. Suri said doctors should consider investigating an underlying malignancy in patients with:
Investigations may include D-dimer testing, tumor markers such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA), other cancer biomarkers and whole-body PET-CT, said the noted neurologist.
A stroke may reveal cancer even without obvious cancer-related symptoms. Emergency stroke treatment must take priority, followed by investigations to identify the cause and prevent recurrence, he added.
Read More: World Stroke Day: What Is BE FAST? Stroke Warning Signs To Watch For
Dr Suri said sudden neurological symptoms in cancer patients require urgent assessment because stroke and brain metastases can present similarly. Brain metastases may also cause seizures and one-sided weakness.
He recommended BE FAST to recognize possible stroke symptoms:
Anyone experiencing these symptoms should seek emergency care, the expert said.
“Time is brain,” he said. Clot-dissolving drugs may be given within four and a half hours in eligible patients, while clot-removal procedures may be possible within six to 24 hours, depending on the patient.
CT scans may be sufficient in many cases, but MRI may help distinguish a stroke from brain metastases.
Dr Suri said that some chemotherapy drugs and hormonal therapies for breast and prostate cancers can increase blood clotting.
Radiation to the neck may cause narrowing, scarring and fibrosis in the carotid arteries, potentially contributing to strokes years later.
READ: 1 in 7 Stroke Patients In India Are Under 45; Hypertension Leads Risk Factors: ICMR Study
Dr Suri advised people to control blood pressure, diabetes, abnormal cholesterol and obesity through physical activity and by avoiding a sedentary lifestyle.
Age, male sex and family history are the non-modifiable risks, while other risk factors include heart disease, smoking, alcohol use, chewing tobacco and drug abuse, which can contribute to strokes even in young people.
Dr Suri described hypertension as the most important modifiable risk factor and a major cause of ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes. He recommended regular blood pressure checks, reducing salt intake, walking and taking prescribed medication. He also stressed diabetes management and identifying atrial fibrillation, which can cause strokes affecting multiple brain blood vessel territories in older adults.
Oncologists should consider stroke risk when choosing treatments, particularly for patients with pancreatic or lung cancer and other adenocarcinomas associated with increased clotting risk, he said.
Treatment may involve addressing the underlying cancer through chemotherapy or surgery and preventing further clots. Warfarin may not work in some cases, and doctors may consider direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or low-molecular-weight heparin.
Dr Suri said having both conditions can worsen prognosis because stroke can cause death or long-term disability, while cancer may reduce life expectancy.
“When these two double whammies are happening together, the outlook becomes much, much graver,” he said, adding neurologists and oncologists must work together to adjust treatment.
“Both of them have to be involved together as a team to plan and modify both the cancer therapy as well as the stroke therapy,” he said.
Some medicines that increase stroke risk may need to be withdrawn. Blood thinners must be selected with the oncologist because certain chemotherapy drugs can rapidly lower platelet and white blood cell counts.
Cancer does not automatically prevent stroke rehabilitation, Suri said, although severe weakness or frailty may limit participation.
“Cancer is not likely to interfere with the rehabilitative processes unless and until it has made the patient very weak and frail,” he said.
Yes, Dr Suri said. Both can occur at any age, although their causes and cancer types may differ across age groups.
“Stroke can occur even in very young children,” he said, noting that infants may have strokes due to arteriopathies and other conditions. Both conditions become more common with age, but neither has a lower age limit.
Credit: AI
Ever since artificial intelligence became a part of our lives, we have fallen into the habit of quickly firing up that chat box and typing our biggest worries, darkest thoughts among many other things. But it has become important to stop and ponder whether AI is really producing the most useful and viable solutions for us.
A recent study published in NEJM AI suggests that artificial intelligence systems may recommend more expensive medical care than doctors. The findings said that AI-generated care plans may cost more than three times as much as doctors’ recommendations.
The researchers compared recommendations from 24 artificial intelligence systems with the recommendations by physicians across 200 outpatient and emergency department visits.
They found that AI systems suggested more diagnostic tests, specialist referrals and medications than doctors.
The average estimated cost of care recommended by 20 general-purpose AI systems was USD 314 per visit compared to USD 97 for physicians’ plans. That was equal to a 3.2-fold difference.
The researchers used 200 de-identified patient history and notes from outpatient and emergency department visits, sourced from MTSamples, a public collection of clinical documentation.
They gave the notes to 24 AI systems, including 20 general-purpose large language models and four specialised medical AI systems. Each system produced an assessment and plan based on that information. Researchers then compared these recommendations with the original physician’s documented plan.
The researchers estimated costs using 2026 US Medicare rates. The cost comparison included diagnostic tests and specialist referrals. New medications were counted separately. The results showed that AI-generated plans recommended more investigations and specialist consultations, increasing the estimated cost of care.
One of the key findings concerned visits in which physicians had not ordered diagnostic tests.
Doctors had recommended no diagnostic testing in approximately 66% of the encounters. Across these visits, the AI systems consistently suggested tests, often including standard panels of blood investigations.
Overall, diagnostic testing recommended by the general-purpose AI systems cost an estimated USD 176 per visit compared to USD 71 for doctors’ plans.
AI systems also recommended specialist referrals and new medications more frequently than doctors. The researchers saw an average of 1.14 new medications per visit across the AI systems, compared to 0.59 in physicians’ plans.
These findings suggest that AI-generated care plans may favour additional investigations and interventions.
Also read: AI Diet Advice Turns Dangerous: ChatGPT Plan Lands Man In ER With Bromide Poisoning
The researchers also examined whether changing the prompts given to AI systems could reduce the cost of their recommendations.
Prompts containing savings and budget-friendly suggestions reduced the estimated cost difference, but did not eliminate it. The cost ratio fell from 3.2 times physicians’ plans to 2.5 times when systems were specifically instructed to recommend cost-friendly tests and medicines.
When the systems were asked to recommend a plan that was both affordable and clinically sound, the ratio fell further, to approximately 1.4 times the physicians’ cost.
While some tests suggested by AI may come across as unnecessary, it should be noted that a physician’s recommended plan is also not the perfect benchmark.
It is possible for doctors to miss investigations that may be clinically needed, while AI systems may suggest additional tests that are unnecessary or poorly suited to an individual patient.
The findings raise questions about how AI systems should be evaluated before being incorporated into clinical decision-making.
AI can help doctors organise patient information, identify diagnoses and consider treatment options. But a recommendation generated by a chatbot is not a prescription or a substitute for a clinician’s assessment.
Credit: AI image
The death of 31-year-old Bowen Wan, who had epilepsy, has raised concerns about relying on AI for medical decisions. A lawsuit filed by her family alleges that she followed ChatGPT’s advice to reduce and eventually stop her anti-seizure medication.
According to the complaint, OpenAI’s chatbot provided a tapering schedule, encouraged her to keep the changes from her doctor and reassured her when she reported symptoms.
Wan, a former Amazon software engineer who lived in Seattle, had been taking lamotrigine to manage her epilepsy. She was concerned that the medication was affecting her memory, speech and performance in job interviews.
Epilepsy is a neurological condition characterized by seizures. Anti-seizure medicines help control abnormal electrical activity in the brain, and treatment is tailored to a person’s condition, seizure history and response to medication.
Although side effects may require treatment adjustments, patients should not independently reduce their dose or stop taking medication. The Epilepsy Foundation warns that suddenly stopping anti-seizure medicines can trigger withdrawal symptoms and potentially life-threatening seizures.
According to reports cited in the lawsuit, ChatGPT allegedly provided a plan to reduce Wan’s daily dose from 400 mg to zero over about 25 days without her doctor’s approval. The complaint further alleges that the chatbot encouraged her to keep the changes from her physician.
In one reported exchange, when Wan asked whether she could reduce the dose herself without telling her doctor, the chatbot allegedly replied, “Yes, you can absolutely do this.”
HealthandMe spoke to two neurologists about the risks of relying on AI tools to decide whether to skip, adjust or restart prescribed medication. They noted that AI can help patients understand medical terms and prepare questions for clinicians, but it should not replace professional advice on changing prescribed treatment.
“AI tools can provide general information but do not have access to a patient's complete medical history, seizure type, medication regimen, test results, or individual risk factors. As a result, their advice may be incomplete, inaccurate, or inappropriate for a specific patient,” said Dr. Sudhir Kumar, Senior Consultant Neurologist, Institute of Neurosciences, Apollo Hospitals, Hyderabad.
“Decisions about stopping, adjusting, or restarting anti-seizure medications should always be made in consultation with a qualified clinician who can assess the benefits and risks in the proper clinical context,” he said.
A missed-dose recommendation may not apply to every anti-seizure medicine or dosing schedule. Drug interactions can also affect medication levels, seizure control and the risk of side effects.
Dr. Praveen Gupta, Chairman of the Marengo Asia International Institute of Neuro and Spine (MAIINS), Marengo Asia Hospitals, told HealthandMe AI tools can help people understand medical information but should not replace a neurologist when decisions about epilepsy treatment are involved.
Managing epilepsy requires an individual assessment of the patient’s seizure type, medical history, prescribed medication and dosage, other health conditions, and response to treatment, he said.
“Patients should not use AI tools to decide whether to stop, restart, increase or reduce their medication. Suddenly stopping some anti-seizure medicines can lead to more severe or prolonged seizures that may require emergency treatment,” Dr. Gupta said.
AI can help patients understand a diagnosis or prepare questions for their doctor, he added, but medication decisions should be made by a qualified health professional who can assess the individual's clinical situation.
Dr. Kumar told HealthandMe that there is no universally safe number of doses a person with epilepsy can miss.
Missing or delaying an anti-seizure dose can lower medication levels in the blood, potentially reducing protection against seizures and increasing the risk of a breakthrough seizure, Dr. Gupta explained. This can happen even in people who have been seizure-free for a long time.
A single missed dose can trigger a seizure in some people, but the risk varies depending on the type of epilepsy, seizure control, medication, its half-life, dosing schedule, and individual susceptibility.
Taking medication as prescribed is the safest approach, the experts said.
The experts advised that patients to:
© $2026 Times Horizon Private Limited