(Credit-Canva)
We are always told to never mix work and friendships in social settings. While it is normal to make friendships at work, you should always keep a professional distance to make sure things do not go sour and start affecting your work. This also means that you do not divulge private information or have private conversations with your colleagues as you may never know how this could be brought up and affect you. This is an unsaid rule in corporate culture that if you are sick or you are coming down with a serious issue, you should never bring it up and keep it to yourself. While this may seem unusual to new workers, it is a very common knowledge for people who have been in the industry for a long time. A new study showed that this is much more common than many people believe!
A new poll shows that a lot of U.S. workers with long-term health problems keep it a secret from their bosses. This affects their health and their jobs. It's a big problem that employers could help fix, which would be good for everyone. This isn't just about people having a sniffle. We're talking about serious conditions like heart disease, diabetes, and asthma that require ongoing management and can significantly impact a person's life, both inside and outside of work. The fact that so many people feel they need to hide these conditions shows a larger issue of stigma and lack of support in the workplace.
Most U.S. workers which were over half of the people, have some kind of long-term health problem. But a lot of them, about 6 out of 10, don't tell their boss. They might be afraid their boss will treat them differently or think they can't do their job. Keeping secrets like this can make it hard to get the help you need at work. It can also make your health problems worse because you're stressed about hiding them. It's a tough situation, and it shows that many workplaces aren't as supportive as they could be.
The poll also found that more than a third of people with health problems have had to miss doctor's appointments because of work. This means they're putting their jobs ahead of their health, which isn't good. It's hard to balance work and health, especially when you have a long-term illness. People need understanding bosses who will let them take time off for important medical stuff. Missing appointments can make health problems worse, and it can also make people feel more stressed and anxious.
Almost half of the workers with health problems said they couldn't even take breaks during the day to take care of themselves. They also said they felt like they'd been passed over for promotions because of their health. And some people even got bad reviews at work because of their health problems. This can make people feel really bad about themselves and their jobs. It can also make their health problems worse because they're so stressed. It's not fair, and it's something that needs to change.
It's not just people with health problems who have a hard time. Lots of people are also taking care of someone at home who is sick. Almost half of these caregivers have to help their sick family member during work hours. And many of them have trouble taking time off to care for their loved ones. Some people even have to work fewer hours, which means less money. This shows how much pressure people are under, trying to juggle work and family and health.
Heat already pushes the body to its limits; smoking removes its safety net. (Photo credit: AI generated)
Indian summers are not just uncomfortable; they are becoming increasingly dangerous. With temperatures frequently crossing 45–48°C, heatwaves are putting excess stress on the human body, which hitherto had not experienced this level of heat strain. Now, add smoking to this already hostile environment and, like adding fuel to a fire, two harmful components combine to multiply the damage. Dr Shubham Garg, Director of Surgical Oncology, Dharamshila Narayana Superspeciality Hospital, Delhi, spoke about the risks of stepping out to grab a smoke during extreme heatwaves.
Smoking during heatwaves doesn’t just worsen existing risks; it accelerates dehydration, strains the heart, damages the lungs, and pushes the body closer to heat exhaustion or heatstroke. Here’s why lighting up in extreme heat is far more dangerous than most people realise.
When temperatures soar, your body works overtime to cool itself. A host of processes happen to aid in this—your blood vessels dilate, there could be an increase in heart rate, and sweating intensifies in order to regulate body temperature. When you smoke, it interferes with these very natural defense mechanisms of your body.
Nicotine results in vasoconstriction—narrowing of blood vessels—which makes it very difficult for the body to release heat trapped inside. The carbon monoxide from cigarettes reduces oxygen delivery to tissues. The result? Less oxygen reaches your organs, which are, in fact, working harder in the extreme heat. This is a perilous combination that can affect the body in many ways.
A heatwave leads to sweating and, consequently, loss of fluids and electrolytes. And when you go for smoking a cigarette, it leads to fluid loss and delayed hydration. Nicotine acts as a mild diuretic, which contributes to increased fluid loss. Smoking also suppresses thirst signals, thus delaying hydration.
Collectively these factors raise the risk of severe dehydration, which can trigger dizziness, muscle cramps, low blood pressure, and confusion—all of which are early signs of heat exhaustion. Many smokers ignore these signs or dismiss them altogether.
Cardiovascular strain can happen independently through either smoking or heat. That in itself is a threat one should keep an eye out for. However, when combined, they pose a compelling risk of:
During extremely hot weather conditions, especially during a heatwave, the heart has to exert more effort to maintain circulation and cooling in the body. Smoking elevates heart rate and blood pressure further while also thickening the blood and increasing the risk of heart attacks and strokes, especially in people with pre-existing diabetes, hypertension, or heart disease.
Hot weather is bad for air pollution levels too, as it traps smoke, dust, and harmful gases close to the ground. When one smokes in these conditions, it severely compromises lung function:
For people with asthma, COPD, or other respiratory conditions, smoking during a heatwave is likely to trigger severe flare-ups and emergency hospital visits.
Extreme heat is damaging not just for the heart but for the skin as well. The skin becomes dehydrated, and collagen breaks down. Smoking compounds this damage by reducing blood flow and oxygen supply to the skin.
The result:
In short, smoking during summer doesn’t just harm internal organs; it visibly accelerates the ageing process.
Smoking reduces the body’s ability to regulate temperature effectively. This makes smokers more vulnerable to heat exhaustion (fatigue, nausea, headache, dizziness) and heatstroke (confusion, collapse, organ failure).
Heatstroke is a medical emergency and can be fatal if not treated promptly. Smokers often misread early warning signs as ‘normal summer weakness,' thus delaying care.
Many smokers try to “reduce” smoking during summer. While any reduction helps, heatwaves are one of the worst times to smoke at all. Even a few cigarettes can significantly increase physiological stress when temperatures are extreme.
Smoking during heatwaves is not just bad—it’s dangerously synergistic. If there ever is a time to quit, or at least pause, this should be it. Because in peak summer, smoking doesn’t just harm you slowly. It fast-tracks damage, turning heat into a silent but serious health threat. In extreme heat, choosing not to smoke isn’t just a lifestyle choice—it’s a life-saving one.
Even imperfect CPR is better than no intervention at all. (Photo credit: AI generated)
When the heart stops functioning, time doesn’t stop with it. In cases of cardiac arrest, time serves as one of the most decisive factors between survival and irreversible loss. Within a couple of seconds, the body starts losing its oxygen supply. In a few minutes, the brain starts to suffer damage. And with each passing minute without intervention, the chances of survival reduce significantly.
This severe reality is at the centre of what Dr Ankit Desai, Paediatric Anaesthetist and Founder & Director of Children’s Anaesthesia Services, explains as “a race against biological shutdown — one where the bystander is the only lifeline”.
Several people have the misconception that cardiac arrest is similar to a heart attack, but they are very different. A heart attack is a circulatory issue where the heart might still be beating. However, in cases of cardiac arrest, there is an electrical failure, and the heart suddenly stops pumping blood effectively.
Whenever this occurs, blood flow to the brain and other vital organs ceases immediately. The oxygen reserves in the brain are extremely limited and typically last for about 4 to 6 minutes before any permanent injury occurs.
This is where the concept of time sensitivity becomes more important. For every passing minute without CPR or defibrillation, the chances of survival drop by approximately 7–10%. By the time 10 minutes have elapsed without intervention, survival is extremely unlikely in most cases.
“The tragedy is not just the cardiac arrest itself,” explains Dr Desai, “but the silence that follows — when no one knows what to do or hesitates too long to act.”
The brain is the first organ to be affected during cardiac arrest. Neurons are highly sensitive to oxygen deprivation. Brain cells start to malfunction within 3 minutes. By 5 minutes, the damage starts becoming increasingly severe. Beyond 10 minutes, the chances of meaningful recovery drastically reduce. This is why immediate CPR is not just a supportive measure but a bridge that keeps oxygen flowing artificially until a normal rhythm can be restored.
Chest compressions manually pump blood to the brain and heart, delaying cell death.
Emergency medical services, even in well-equipped systems, often take several minutes to reach a patient. In urban areas, response times may be shorter, but they are rarely instantaneous. In cardiac arrest, those minutes matter more than any hospital intervention.
Dr Desai emphasises that “the first responder is almost always not a doctor — it is a family member, a colleague, or a nearby stranger”.
This makes bystander CPR the most critical determinant of survival. Studies consistently show that when CPR is initiated immediately, survival rates can double or even triple compared to cases where no bystander action is taken.
Yet fear, hesitation, and lack of training remain major barriers. Many people worry about performing CPR incorrectly, causing harm, or being held legally responsible. In reality, doing nothing is far more dangerous than taking imperfect action.
Medical professionals often refer to this situation as the “Chain of Survival”, which includes early detection of cardiac arrest, immediate CPR, rapid defibrillation (AED use), advanced medical care, and post-resuscitation support. Every link in this chain is highly time-sensitive. Any delay in one step weakens the entire outcome. The strongest determinant, however, remains the second step — early CPR.
Automated External Defibrillators (AEDs), if available, can help restore a normal heart rhythm if used quickly. But again, their effectiveness decreases sharply with delay. The combination of CPR and early defibrillation within the first few minutes offers the best chance of survival.
The key difference between life and death is less about complexity and more about readiness.
Awareness training helps transform bystanders into responders. A person who knows how to identify cardiac arrest — unresponsiveness, absence of breathing, sudden collapse — is far more likely to act immediately rather than wait.
Dr Desai highlights a critical cultural gap: “We often associate medical emergencies with hospitals. But cardiac arrest begins in living rooms, offices, gyms, and streets. The response must begin there, too.”
Basic CPR training takes less than an hour to learn, but can influence outcomes for decades. Schools, workplaces, and community programmes play a vital role in normalising this skill.
One aspect of cardiac arrest that often gets overlooked is human hesitation. Bystanders often freeze due to shock and uncertainty. Some assume that someone else will step in. Others underestimate the severity of the situation.
Public awareness campaigns help highlight the simplicity of CPR, which helps overcome this barrier. Hands-only CPR focuses on continuous chest compressions without mouth-to-mouth breathing, making intervention much easier and more accessible. The message is simple: push hard, push fast, and don’t stop until help arrives.
Cardiac arrest survival is not just a medical issue, but also one of public preparedness. The Chain of Survival starts long before the emergency happens. It starts with education, confidence, and awareness.
Dr Desai states that “if more people understood how little time they truly have, more lives would be saved not by hospitals, but by ordinary people doing extraordinary things in the first five minutes”.
Conclusion: time is the real patient
In cardiac arrest, the patient is not just the person who collapses — it is time itself. Every second lost reduces the chance of recovery. Every trained bystander becomes a potential lifesaver. The science is clear, the timeline is unforgiving, and the solution is remarkably simple: act immediately, compress the chest, and keep blood flowing until professional help arrives.
Credit: AI generated image
For years, PCOS was often diagnosed through the most visible disruptions: irregular periods, acne, facial hair, weight gain, or difficulty conceiving. That made many patients enter the healthcare system through gynecology, usually when menstrual, reproductive, or visible hormonal symptoms became hard to ignore.
The shift from Polycystic Ovary Syndrome to Polyendocrine Metabolic Ovarian Syndrome encourages clinicians to look earlier, wider, and more systematically at the condition.
The old name placed the ovary at the center of the condition. PMOS keeps ovarian function in the picture, but it widens the diagnostic lens to include the hormone and metabolic systems that are often involved from the start. This distinction matters because the condition is not defined by harmful ovarian cysts. In fact, ovarian cysts are not required for diagnosis, and some women with PCOS may not show polycystic ovaries on ultrasound at all. The newer name, therefore, helps move diagnosis beyond a scan-based or ovary-only understanding, and closer to how the condition actually presents and manifests itself in the body.
With PMOS, diagnosis should become less dependent on ultrasound and more attentive to the full clinical pattern. Doctors will still look at irregular or absent periods and signs of high androgen levels, such as acne, excess facial or body hair, hair thinning, and raised testosterone levels, where tested. But the newer framing should also make metabolic screening routine, especially for insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes risk, blood pressure, cholesterol, obesity, sleep apnea, and fatty liver-related concerns. WHO describes PCOS as a chronic metabolic condition that can persist beyond the reproductive years, with symptoms and risks varying from person to person.
The scale of underdiagnosis is large. It is estimated that PCOS affects 10–13% of reproductive-aged women, while up to 70% of affected women worldwide may not know they have the condition. A name that leads with “polyendocrine” and “metabolic” may help clinicians connect symptoms that were previously treated separately: a dermatologist sees acne, a gynecologist sees irregular periods, an endocrinologist sees insulin resistance, and a mental-health professional sees anxiety or poor quality of life.
The diagnosis is not changing into a different disease. The condition remains the same, but the way it is understood may become broader and more accurate. The real opportunity lies in better recognition: fewer patients being told their symptoms are only about cysts, weight, periods or fertility, and more patients being assessed for the long-term hormonal and metabolic risks that can come with the condition.
For this shift to matter, awareness must grow across the medical fraternity and among patients, so PMOS is approached as a multi-system condition; symptoms are recognized earlier, and care becomes more connected from the beginning.
(Written by Dr. Rashmi Dharaskar, Sr. Consultant Obstetrics and Gynaecologist at Surya Mother & Child Super Specialty Hospital).
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited