When Ozempic And Wegovy Fail To Work- Why GLP-1 Drugs Aren’t The Magic Bullet For Everyone
Ozempic and Wegovy have received a lot of publicity as revolutionizing treatment options for obesity. Both medications form a class of GLP-1 receptor agonists, which mimic a hormone in the body called glucagon-like peptide-1 and are involved in the regulation of appetite and blood sugar. Indeed, in initial clinical studies, the majority of those on the drugs lost 15% to 22% of body weight, hence much optimism. For most patients, these medications are underwhelming for about 20% of patients due to minimal weight loss or other challenges.
Take a closer look at why the weight loss drugs may not work for everyone, together with what options exist when they don't deliver the expected outcomes.
While GLP-1 receptor agonists have produced phenomenal responses in a majority of patients, it remains a reality that these drugs work differently for different people. Here's why:
1. Genetic and Hormonal Variability
Weight loss medications interact with complex systems in the body that differ from person to person. Genetics, hormones, and individual brain responses to energy regulation play significant roles in determining how a person responds to drugs like Ozempic and Wegovy.
2. Underlying Medical Conditions
Other conditions, such as sleep apnea, may be prevalent and prevent or delay the achievement of weight loss goals. Prescription drugs like antidepressants, steroids, or contraceptives are other medications that can nullify weight loss medication benefits.
3. Unrealistic Expectations
Often, they come to these medications with enormous hopes; expecting the promised rapid and dramatic weight loss. Progress creates disappointment if it has not stalled. In patients who rigidly follow recommended lifestyle modifications, frustration and disappointment are most common.
For most patients, the effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists is evident within a few weeks of treatment. Weight loss typically begins within a few weeks of initiating therapy and tends to increase with dosage. However, some patients respond very little, if at all, despite strict adherence to their regimen.
For nonresponders, this can feel like a dead end. However, understanding the unique complexities of obesity is essential. This condition stems from brain dysfunction, and the pathways that contribute to weight regulation differ among individuals.
When Ozempic or Wegovy doesn’t yield desired results, there are still many paths to explore:
For example, some patients who don't respond well to one GLP-1 receptor agonist might find success with another drug in the same class. Newer medications, such as Zepbound, target other hormone pathways and seem promising even for those not responsive to earlier drugs.
While there is much to say about newer drugs, older treatments can still be useful and work for some patients. One can also seek the help of a medical provider specializing in obesity treatments in order to identify the best alternatives.
Diet, exercise, sleep, and stress management continue to be integral components of any weight loss program. New changes may be small but can make an enormous difference in one's health and success.
It is a complex disorder, and most patients should receive a multidisciplinary treatment. Collaboration with an obesity-aware doctor may mean access to tailored treatment plans, ranging from psychological support all the way to metabolic testing, and many others.
For others, side effects like nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea hinder them from continuing with these drugs. These symptoms often reduce as the body becomes accustomed, but for some, they might be severe enough to stop treatment altogether. In those instances, alternative drugs or procedures become vital to find.
Another largely unexplored area relates to GLP-1 drugs' long-term effects on the brain's regulation of hunger and satiety. Although GLP-1 drugs suppress appetite and can lead to effective weight loss, emerging research suggests that they may also affect brain reward mechanisms, changing the way patients experience foods.
This aspect could prove of paramount significance in the future treatment of obesity. Perhaps GLP-1 receptor agonists do indeed affect and rewire the brain's reward pathways and will thus provide sustained benefits beyond discontinuation. However, more research is required to understand this phenomenon fully.
While for many, Ozempic and Wegovy have revolutionized obesity treatment, these are certainly not a one size fits all. Nonresponders need not lose hope- alternative strategies and medications abound. A consultation with an obesity expert healthcare provider is essential to put together a comprehensive, tailored treatment plan.
The route toward effective weight loss may be challenging, but with the evolution of obesity medicine and a better understanding of individual needs, there is a path forward for everyone.
Credits: Canva
The NHS has released updated guidance for people who are currently taking clonazepam, a commonly prescribed medicine that belongs to the benzodiazepine group. According to the health service, clonazepam is often used to control seizures or fits linked to epilepsy, ease involuntary muscle spasms, and help manage panic disorders. It is also prescribed in some cases for people with restless legs syndrome (RLS). NHS Inform notes that “around 1 in 10 people experience restless legs syndrome at some stage in their life.”
Explaining how the drug works, the NHS says it increases levels of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), a chemical in the brain that has a calming effect. By boosting GABA, clonazepam can reduce anxiety, prevent seizures or fits, and relax tight or overactive muscles.
Clonazepam is only available on prescription and comes as tablets or a liquid. Most adults aged 18 and over can take either form. In certain cases, children as young as one month old may be prescribed clonazepam to treat epilepsy, as per NHS.
That said, there are situations where extra caution is needed. People who are due to have surgery or dental treatment, those who are pregnant, trying to conceive, or who have sleep-related conditions may be advised to stop taking the medicine. However, these are not the only groups the NHS says should be careful.
Clonazepam is not suitable for everyone. Before starting treatment, patients are advised to tell their doctor if they:
Like many medicines, clonazepam can cause side effects. Common effects, which affect more than 1 in 100 people, include disturbed sleep such as vivid dreams, feeling sleepy during the day, light-headedness, dizziness, unsteadiness, and muscle weakness.
When it comes to long-term use, the NHS warns that clonazepam can lead to withdrawal symptoms if taken for a prolonged period. Because of this risk, people who have been prescribed the drug for more than four weeks may have their dose reduced slowly when stopping treatment, rather than stopping suddenly.
The NHS also stresses that this is not a complete list of side effects. Patients are advised to read the information leaflet that comes with their medicine for full details.
Although uncommon, some people may experience serious side effects while taking clonazepam. The NHS advises contacting a doctor or calling 111 immediately if you notice:
In rare cases, clonazepam can trigger a serious allergic reaction known as anaphylaxis.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and is not intended as a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified doctor, pharmacist, or healthcare provider before starting, stopping, or changing the dosage of any medication.
Credits: AI Generated
Every winter, people in Delhi prepare themselves for stinging eyes, tight chests and coughs that refuse to go away as thick smog blankets the city. Now, fresh research from Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) suggests there is another hidden danger in the polluted air. According to the study, Delhi’s winter smog may also be carrying antibiotic-resistant bacteria, adding to health worries in one of the most polluted cities on the planet.
The research, titled Distribution and antibiotic resistance patterns of airborne staphylococci in urban environments of Delhi, India, was published in Nature – Scientific Reports. It found disturbingly high levels of antibiotic-resistant “superbugs” in both indoor and outdoor air across the city, particularly in winter when pollution levels spike. The findings point to polluted air acting as a possible vehicle for antimicrobial resistance (AMR), which experts already consider one of the gravest global health threats.
As per Indian Express, to understand what people might be breathing in, the researchers collected air samples from a range of everyday locations across Delhi, such as:
Both indoor and outdoor air samples were taken during summer, monsoon and winter to track how bacterial levels and resistance patterns shifted with the seasons.
Across every setting, airborne bacteria levels were far above the World Health Organization’s recommended safe limit for microbial exposure. In some winter samples, bacterial counts exceeded 16,000 colony-forming units per cubic metre, which is more than 16 times higher than the WHO guideline.
What raised even greater concern was the type of bacteria detected. Many belonged to the Staphylococcus group, which includes strains linked to skin infections, pneumonia, bloodstream infections and illnesses commonly acquired in hospitals.
According to the researchers, a large share of the airborne bacteria were identified as methicillin-resistant staphylococci (MRS), meaning they do not respond to commonly prescribed antibiotics. Among these:
Notably, 14 out of 36 multidrug-resistant samples carried the mecA gene, a well-known marker that makes bacteria resistant to methicillin and related antibiotics.
The study showed that levels of airborne drug-resistant bacteria were highest in winter, while monsoon rains led to a sharp drop in outdoor contamination.
Researchers point to a few likely reasons:
On the other hand, rainfall during the monsoon appears to clear bioaerosols from the air, reducing bacterial concentrations outdoors.
Many healthy people may breathe in these bacteria without becoming sick. However, the risk is much higher for:
The researchers note that inhaling drug-resistant bacteria does not automatically lead to infection. Still, it raises the risk of infections that are harder to treat, especially if the bacteria manage to enter vulnerable parts of the body.
Credit: Canva
Researchers say consuming excessive short-form videos on social media may lead to 'brain rot' and cause cognitive decline, increase the risk of depression and worsen behavior in young children and adults.
Named as the 2024 Oxford University Word Of The Year, 'brain rot' is defined as the supposed deterioration of a person’s intellectual state due to overconsumption of low-quality online content such as TikTok videos, Instagram reels and YouTube Shorts.
Until now, brain rot was considered to be merely internet slang but now multiple studies show that the condition can, indeed, impact overall brain health and pave the way for neurodegenerative diseases.
According to a literature review published in Psychological Bulletin, a journal of the American Psychological Association, scientists found links between heavy consumption of such videos and increased symptoms of depression, anxiety, stress and loneliness.
Additionally, the September 2025 study also found that extreme intake of short form videos (SFVs) can worsen cognitive functioning and weakening emotional control as well as regulation.
Moreover, an October 2025 study from Capella University, Minneapolis which summarized 14 studies on SFVs discovered that people who regularly watch videos, ranging between 15 to 60 seconds, were prone to developing 'TikTok Brain' and suffered from low attention spans.
The review noted, "Reports from educators and parents describe teens struggling to focus in class or during prolonged tasks, behavior changes often attributed to constant stimulation from social media scrolling."
Based on these results, Keith Robert Head, a doctoral student in social work at Capella University and study author commented, "So one of the questions that would be interesting for researchers to study is: Are these ADHD diagnoses actually ADHD, or is it an impact from the continued use of short-form video?"
James Jackson, a neuropsychologist at Vanderbilt University Medical Center told NBC News, "The narrative that the only people who are worried about this are grumpy old grandpas who are yelling at you to get off their lawn or the idea that if you’re concerned about this you’re not in step with the times, I think that’s really simplistic."
He also noted that SFVs can be useful through the opportunities it creates for learning as well as community-building and social media users should seek to maintain a balance.
“There are people that engage with short-form videos in ways that are value-added, for sure. But if their engagement is pulling them away from other, more healthy opportunities, if it is isolating them from other people, if it is creating situations where they’re less and less likely to just sit around and be bored, I think that’s a problem," he said.
She further noted that it may take many years of study to determine whether cognitive changes associated with SFVs consumption are reversible and whether they can qualify as an 'addiction'
“It might be too early to claim universal doom,” Gupta said. “The research for alcohol, cigarettes and drugs took 75 years or more to develop. But I would be surprised if, in the next five to 10 years, we do not have similar signs validating the moral panic that we have around short-form videos.”
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited