A new report published in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology challenges the conventional definition of obesity, and urges a shift from the reliance on Body Mass Index (BMI) to a more nuanced approach. This is supported by over 50 global medical experts. The report also recommends splitting the term "obesity" into two categories: "Clinical obesity" and "Pre-clinical obesity". This aims to improve diagnosis and treatment for over a billion people worldwide living with obesity.
This applies to individuals whose obesity has progressed to a disease state, manifesting in organ damage, heart disease, type 2 diabetes, or other health complications. These individuals could also experience symptoms like breathlessness, joint pain, or impaired daily functioning. Treatment also involves medical interventions, including weight-loss medications or surgery.
Whereas the term "pre-clinic obese" refers to those who are overweight but not yet exhibiting health issues. While they may be at risk of developing obesity-related conditions, their organ function and overall health remain intact. What they need is preventive care, which includes dietary guidance, counselling, and regular monitoring to avoid and reduce future health risks.
The study, led by Professor Francesco Rubino from King's College London emphasizes that obesity is not one-size-fits-all condition. This means it should rather be treated as a spectrum as some individuals maintain normal organ function despite being classified as obese. There are others who may face severe health complications too. However, the current method of calculating obesity based on BMI often leads to misdiagnosis or inadequate care.
The report also states that BMI, while is useful for analyzing population trends, is a flawed unit of measuring individual health. Therefore, there is a need to redefine obesity, and healthcare professionals can provide more precise care by distinguishing those who need immediate medical intervention and those who require preventive strategies.
BMI is used to classify individuals as underweight, healthy weight, overweight, or obese based on their height and weight. It is calculated by dividing weight in kilograms by health in meters squared. However, there are reasons while it falls short.
•Muscle vs Fat: Athletes or muscular individuals often have high BMIs despite the low body fat
•Fat Distribution: BMI does not measure fat around the waist or organs, which could be more dangerous to one's health.
•Individual Health Variation: It also overlooks the specific health conditions such as heart diseases or diabetes, or any other, while evaluating a person's category in terms of weight.
ALSO READ: Is It Time To Say Goodbye To BMI?
By redefining obesity, the study could transform the approach to diagnosis and treatment. It can focus on individual health risks rather than BMI alone. Healthcare providers can also offer tailored care. This also will ensure hat weight-loss medications like Wegovy or Mounjaro are prescribed only to those who genuinely require it.
As per Professor Louise Baur from the University of Sydney, a Children's obesity expert said that this redefinition allows both adults and children to receive more appropriate care while reducing over-diagnosis and unnecessary treatments.
Credit: AI
It can be confusing and sometimes alarming to receive different thyroid test results from two different laboratories, especially when both tests are done on the same day. A slight difference in values does not necessarily mean that your thyroid function has suddenly changed. In many cases, the variation is due to differences in how the tests are performed rather than a change in your health.
One of the biggest reasons for varying results is the laboratory itself. Accredited laboratories, such as NABL-certified labs, follow stringent quality-control measures, use standardised testing protocols and have trained personnel to handle samples correctly. Laboratories with less rigorous quality standards may produce results that are less consistent.
The equipment and testing methods used can also differ from one laboratory to another. Different analysers, calibration techniques and testing kits can produce slightly different values for thyroid hormones such as TSH, T3, T4, Free T3 and Free T4.
Even the reference ranges printed on reports may not be identical because each laboratory establishes its own normal range based on the equipment used and the population it serves.
Also read: UK Approves Eli Lilly’s Foundayo: Is the GLP-1 Pill Better Than Wegovy, Mounjaro?
The timing of the test is another important factor. Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) naturally fluctuates throughout the day. It is generally higher during the early hours of the morning and gradually falls as the day progresses.
As a result, a blood sample collected in the afternoon may show a lower TSH level than one collected early in the morning.
Lifestyle and biological factors can also influence thyroid hormone levels. Stress, poor sleep, recent illness, medications and even eating before the test may affect the results.
For people taking thyroid medication, blood samples should ideally be collected in the morning on an empty stomach and before taking the daily dose. Testing after medication may temporarily alter hormone levels and make interpretation more difficult.
Also read: Why Women Want Hormonal Health Care, Not Just Pregnancy Care
Certain supplements and medications can interfere with thyroid tests as well. Biotin, commonly found in hair and nail supplements, can falsely lower TSH levels while increasing Free T3 and Free T4 values.
Medications such as amiodarone, glucocorticoids, dopamine and heparin may also affect thyroid hormone measurements. During pregnancy, hormonal changes, particularly increased levels of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), can naturally alter TSH values.
Laboratory handling also plays a role. Delays in processing, improper storage temperatures, differences in centrifugation timing or sample-handling errors can influence the final result.
In some individuals, thyroid autoantibodies may interfere with laboratory assays, potentially leading to inaccurate Free T3 and Free T4 measurements.
Also read: Silent Neck Swellings: Why An Unusual Lump Should Never Be Ignored
Because of these variables, experts recommend getting thyroid tests done at the same accredited laboratory whenever possible. This allows doctors to compare results more reliably over time.
If a thyroid value is only mildly abnormal or falls within a borderline range, it may often be advisable to repeat the test before making a diagnosis or starting lifelong medication.
Ultimately, thyroid test reports should never be interpreted in isolation. Doctors consider the patient's symptoms, medical history, physical examination and repeat test results before deciding on treatment.
Consistency in where and how the test is performed can help avoid unnecessary anxiety and support more accurate clinical decisions.
By Dr Shaheen Guy, General Physician, Saifee Hospital, Mumbai
Credit: AI
Robotic surgery has rapidly become one of the most talked-about advances in modern medicine. Yet, for many patients, the technology remains misunderstood.
The first thing to know is that the robot does not perform the operation. Every movement is directed by the surgeon. The robotic platform translates the surgeon’s hand movements into highly precise, tremor-filtered movements inside the body while providing magnified three-dimensional vision and greater instrument dexterity.
The real question, therefore, is not whether robotic surgery is better. It is whether it is the right choice for a particular patient, procedure and surgeon.
For many routine operations, conventional laparoscopy may achieve equally good outcomes. Technology should support clinical judgment, not replace it.
Patients should also recognise that outcomes depend far more on the experience of the surgical team than on the robotic system itself. Successful robotic surgery requires specialised training, structured credentialing and a coordinated operating theatre team.
Choosing an experienced surgeon can therefore be more important than choosing a hospital simply because it owns a robotic system.
Another important development is that robotic surgery is becoming more accessible. Indigenous platforms are helping expand advanced surgical care beyond a handful of metropolitan hospitals by making robotic programmes more viable for a wider range of healthcare institutions.
This gradual decentralisation means patients in Tier II and Tier III cities can increasingly access advanced minimally invasive surgery closer to home, reducing the need to travel long distances for specialised treatment.
Also read: Osteoporosis Drugs Offer New Hope For Back Pain By Blocking Disc Mineralisation: Study
Innovation is also extending beyond the operating room. Robotic telesurgery, demonstrated successfully using Made-in-India robotic platforms, has shown that expert surgeons can operate across vast distances using secure digital networks.
While widespread adoption will require robust infrastructure and regulatory frameworks, the technology represents an important step towards improving access to specialised surgical expertise.
Patients should look beyond the hype and ask informed questions:
With indigenous platforms helping decentralise robotic surgery, advanced care is becoming more accessible beyond major metros. The technology has also demonstrated the potential of interhospital telesurgery, enabling expert surgeons to operate across distances and potentially helping bridge gaps in access to highly skilled surgical expertise.
Ultimately, the future of surgery will not be shaped by machines alone. It will be shaped by skilled surgeons using intelligent technology to deliver safer, more precise and equitable patient care.
Credit: AI
A cigarette after stress. Chewing tobacco during the day. Smoking to “calm the nerves”
But modern science is forcing us to confront the difficult truth; Tobacco does not treat mental health symptoms, in fact it quietly deepens it.
As Oncologists and physicians, we often see patients who say, “smoking makes them feel normal.” However, in reality, what they are experiencing is nothing more than the temporary relief from nicotine withdrawal not genuine emotional regulation.
When we smoke or chew tobacco, nicotine stimulates dopamine release in the brain, creating a short-lived sense of relaxation or control. But overtime it leads to brain depending on nicotine to achieve the same baseline feeling again and again. The result is a vicious cycle of dependence, irritability, anxiety, and worsening emotional resilience.
Several large studies now show that long-term tobacco use is associated with higher rates of anxiety, depression, sleep issues and substance dependence. A 2023 review published in BMJ found that smoking cessation will result in improvements in both anxiety and depression and an improved mood with benefits comparable to antidepressant treatment in some individuals.
Also read: Lung Health After 40: Natural Changes, Warning Signs And Ways To Protect Your Lungs
This has serious implications for the urban Indian population in regard to the increasing prevalence of mental exhaustion, lack of social support, digital overload, work-related stress and lack of sleep. Tobacco often enters quietly during vulnerable moments of college pressure, workplace stress, loneliness, grief and gradually shifts from “social habit” to psychological crutch.
Although they think they believe in tobacco, many of them use it, thinking that they are using it to cope with their emotional symptoms, when in fact they are making the symptoms worse.
Also, recognize the biology of tobacco use. For example, the use of nicotine will result in long-term changes in how well your body handles emotional stress because of the role of long-term nicotine exposure in altering the system of cortisol regulation and the stress response pathways in neurons. So, with time, it will become harder and harder for a person to control his/her emotional response to stress because his/her body will not be able to do it. Thus, tobacco has a negative influence on the recovery process from emotional responses to stress, rather than a beneficial one.
Also read: Air Pollution May Increase The Risk Of Painful Rheumatoid Arthritis Flares, Study Finds
Tobacco is a significant preventable risk factor for oral, head and neck, lung, oesophageal, pancreatic and bladder cancers. When many patients arrive at cancer centres, the addiction to tobacco is already set, and it is even more difficult to quit while receiving cancer treatment.
This is why it is important to help move the conversation on tobacco beyond cancer. Now, it's more than just a public health issue; it also includes issues of mental health. Individuals experiencing emotional difficulties should not think that they are being judged. They have to learn to find alternative coping strategies, get psychological support early on in their lives, sleep well, exercise, be part of the community, and access timely medical support. The goal of this care is not just to support someone in quitting tobacco, but to provide support for them to stop needing tobacco in order to feel good.
By Dr Amit Chakraborty, Consultant Oncologist, Saifee Hospital, Mumbai
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited