(Credit-Canva)
We all enjoy a good slushie every now and then. While they do not add any great nutritional value to our meal, they are a delightful snack made with shredded ice and sugar. To make them more accessible to people who cannot or do not wish to have sugar, there are many sugar free options to pick from. However, a recent study has revealed that sugar-free slushies containing glycerol, which is a sugar alcohol used to maintain their icy texture, can cause severe health problems in young children. The study was published in the journal Archives of Disease in Childhood, it explains that having these sugar free slushies can lead to children having a condition called "glycerol intoxication syndrome". In this condition there is a rapid drop in blood sugar, reduced consciousness, and a buildup of acid in the blood.
Kids who drank slushies with glycerol got sick very quickly. Within an hour, they started showing serious symptoms. Their blood sugar would plummet, sometimes dangerously low. Many became confused or lost consciousness, and some even had seizures. Doctors studied 21 children who got sick from these drinks between 2018 and 2024. Most of these kids were very young, seven years old or younger. By the time they got to the hospital, many were in bad shape, either unconscious or barely awake. This quick reaction time makes it especially scary, as parents might not realize the slushy is the cause right away. It's important to recognize these signs fast.
According to WebMD Glycerol is a type of naturally occurring alcohol, and it's used in lots of food products. You might find it in protein bars, diet foods, and even sugar-free candies. In slushies, it plays a key role in keeping the drink icy. Usually, slushies use tons of sugar to stop them from freezing completely. But because people are trying to cut back on sugar, companies are using glycerol instead. This is especially true in places with "sugar taxes," where sugary drinks cost more. So, to make sugar-free versions, they add glycerol. This switch means more kids are being exposed to this ingredient, which can be harmful to them.
The study explains that little kids are more at risk from glycerol because their bodies are still growing and developing. Their tiny bodies and young metabolisms might not be able to handle glycerol as well as adults' bodies can. This means that even a small amount can cause a big problem. Also, the amount of glycerol in a slushy can vary, and it's hard to know exactly how much is safe. Factors like how fast they drink it, if they've eaten recently, or if they've been exercising can also make a difference. Even the standard size of a slushy drink can be too much for a small child. This makes it hard to give a safe dose.
Health authorities in the UK and Ireland have already started warning about glycerol in slushies. They suggest that kids under four shouldn't have them at all, and older kids should only have one at most. But doctors are worried that these warnings might not be enough. They point out that it's hard to know how much glycerol is actually in each drink, making it difficult to give safe advice. Parents are being told to be very careful and consider avoiding these drinks altogether for young children. In the US, glycerol is approved for use in food, but parents should still be aware of the potential risks. More research is needed to understand the full impact.
Credits: Canva
As per the World Health Organization (WHO), more than 720 000 people die due to suicide every year. Suicide is the third leading cause of death among 15–29-year-olds.
November 22 is observed as the International Survivors of Suicide Loss Day, which brings attention to a form of grief, which is not always talked about. Neuroscience now provides more clarity on how different the experience of losing someone close is. This experience is not just gone for once, but instead as recurring waves of pain, intrusive questions, and long-lasting emotional "aftershocks".
Suicide loss comes in many layers of shocks, guilty, and often confusion. The brain not only processes the loss, but also a rupture. There are many forms of grief, including cognitive, emotional, and sometimes biological, if it is a lost family member, like a daughter, son, sister, or a very close family member.
The amygdala is responsible for detecting fear and danger. After a suicide loss, it can stay hyperactive for months or even years.
Sudden reminders, unanswered questions, anniversaries, or simple triggers—like a song, photo, or notification, can instantly activate the brain’s stress response. Experts suggest since suicide is an unexpected and traumatic incident, the amygdala keeps replaying the alert and thus the survivors could often feel frozen in the moment when they receive the news.
The hippocampus helps form memories and gives context to events. After a suicide loss, the brain tries to create meaning around something that often has no clear explanation. This leads to persistent mental looping:
These are not just emotional spirals—they are the hippocampus working overtime, trying to rebuild a narrative that makes sense, even when the event itself defies understanding.
The day was created in 1999, following a US Senate resolution that was introduced by Senator Harry Reid, who lost his father to suicide. The day was officially designated by the United States Congress as a time for those affected by suicide loss to come together for healing and support.
The American Foundation for Suicide Prevention of Illinois has also planned multiple free, in-person gatherings for people who have lost someone to suicide. Angela Cummings, who is the executive director of the foundation says, "Grief after suicide is unique, and so is the strength it takes to keep going," as reported by My Journal Corner.
"Survivor Day helps people find understanding and connection through shared experience. It reminds us that even in the midst of loss, hope and healing are possible."
Every year, the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention sponsors International Survivors of Suicide Loss Day, a program that unites survivors of suicide loss across the world. These events help survivors cope with the tragedy of losing someone to suicide.
Credits: Canva
Permanent hair dyes promise vibrant, long-lasting colour, but many contain a hidden risk: a chemical called p-phenylenediamine, or PPD. While essential for keeping hair shades bold, PPD has been linked to allergic reactions, skin inflammation, and, in rare cases, life-threatening poisoning. Experts warn that even everyday use can trigger unexpected skin issues, making awareness and caution crucial for anyone coloring their hair.
Most permanent hair dyes sold in the US and Europe contain an ingredient called p-phenylenediamine (PPD), an aromatic amine. This chemical is essential for keeping hair colour long-lasting and resistant to washing or drying. However, research increasingly links PPD to severe allergic reactions, potential cancer risks, and even life-threatening poisoning.
Even in normal cosmetic use, the body absorbs only small amounts of PPD, but it can still trigger a variety of health issues. Allergic reactions and contact dermatitis are the most common. About 72 hours after exposure, PPD can provoke immune sensitization and inflammation, which may show up as redness, swelling, blisters, and intense itching.
People with pre-existing skin conditions such as eczema, dandruff, or other rashes are more susceptible. While 1.5% of the general population may react to PPD, this rises to 6% among those already prone to dermatitis.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies occupational exposure to hair dye as “probably carcinogenic,” but personal use hasn’t been conclusively linked to cancer. A 36-year study in 2020 found no strong association between regular hair dye use and most cancers, although it noted potential links to specific types, including estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer and basal cell carcinoma. Experts caution that these findings are not definitive and require further investigation.
While cosmetic exposure carries minimal systemic risk, ingesting PPD can be deadly. Oral exposure can cause rapid multi-organ failure, with initial signs including unpredictable swelling of the neck and airways, known as angioneurotic edema. Even with medical intervention, the mortality rate for severe PPD poisoning is around 14.5%.
Rising awareness of PPD’s risks has prompted the development of PPD-free dyes using alternatives like p-toluenediamine sulfate (PTDS). However, research shows that about half of individuals allergic to PPD may also react to PTDS.
The safest way to reduce risk is by performing a patch test 48 hours before every use. Professional users should wear protective gloves, and improved consumer education on potential sensitivities can further minimize danger.
Finding out if you’re sensitive to PPD is relatively straightforward. You can visit an allergy clinic for a professional assessment, or do a patch test at home before applying any PPD-based hair dye.
PPD may appear under different names on hair dye packaging. Look out for any of the following terms, as they all indicate the presence of PPD:
Credits: Canva
COVID-19 and influenza are major causes of illness and death worldwide, particularly in countries like the US and UK. Vaccines can prevent infection or reduce the severity of illness, yet many people struggle to stay up to date due to time constraints or lack of motivation. If you are eligible for both vaccines around the same time, combining them in a single visit can save time and effort.
Doctors suggest that receiving both vaccines at the same visit can be a convenient approach, but a common question arises: which arm should you use? Is it safe to administer both vaccines in the same arm, or is it better to use separate arms?
Getting both shots in one visit sounds efficient, but you still need to decide whether to use one arm or two. Often, it comes down to personal preference, although sometimes the healthcare provider will make the decision. Is there evidence to guide this choice? Should both vaccines go in the same arm or one in each?
Animal studies suggest that administering the COVID and flu vaccines in the same limb may enhance immune responses. The mRNA COVID vaccines include a built-in immune booster called an ionizable lipid, which is a fatty molecule that protects the mRNA inside the vaccine.
Flu vaccines usually lack an adjuvant, but the built-in adjuvant in the COVID shot could potentially boost the flu vaccine’s immune response if both are given in the same arm.
However, giving two shots in one arm can increase the risk of arm soreness, the most common side effect. To explore this in humans, researchers at the University of Melbourne conducted a randomized controlled trial with 56 healthy adults. The study compared giving the Moderna COVID mRNA vaccine and the CSL influenza vaccine in the same arm versus opposite arms.
Participants were randomly assigned to two groups: the “same arm” group received both vaccines in the non-dominant arm (usually the left arm for right-handed people), while the “opposite arm” group had the COVID vaccine in the non-dominant arm and the flu vaccine in the dominant arm. This setup was chosen because the COVID vaccine is more likely to cause a sore arm compared to the flu shot. Researchers collected blood, saliva, and nasal samples, and participants reported on any side effects.
The trial found no significant differences in key immune responses, such as neutralizing antibodies, whether the vaccines were given in the same arm or separate arms. Secondary analyses suggested a slightly higher immune response to COVID in the opposite arm group.
Nearly all participants reported mild arm soreness. Those in the same-arm group experienced more tenderness in that single arm, while participants in the opposite-arm group had reactions in both arms, particularly in the non-dominant arm that received the COVID vaccine.
Overall, receiving both vaccines on the same day, whether in one arm or two, provides strong protection against both infections. Choosing opposite arms may slightly improve immune response and reduce soreness in any one arm, but it comes with two mildly sore arms.
For anyone looking to save time, having both vaccines in the same visit is convenient and effective. Most side effects are mild, making the benefits of dual vaccination well worth it.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited