(Credit-Canva)
We all enjoy a good slushie every now and then. While they do not add any great nutritional value to our meal, they are a delightful snack made with shredded ice and sugar. To make them more accessible to people who cannot or do not wish to have sugar, there are many sugar free options to pick from. However, a recent study has revealed that sugar-free slushies containing glycerol, which is a sugar alcohol used to maintain their icy texture, can cause severe health problems in young children. The study was published in the journal Archives of Disease in Childhood, it explains that having these sugar free slushies can lead to children having a condition called "glycerol intoxication syndrome". In this condition there is a rapid drop in blood sugar, reduced consciousness, and a buildup of acid in the blood.
Kids who drank slushies with glycerol got sick very quickly. Within an hour, they started showing serious symptoms. Their blood sugar would plummet, sometimes dangerously low. Many became confused or lost consciousness, and some even had seizures. Doctors studied 21 children who got sick from these drinks between 2018 and 2024. Most of these kids were very young, seven years old or younger. By the time they got to the hospital, many were in bad shape, either unconscious or barely awake. This quick reaction time makes it especially scary, as parents might not realize the slushy is the cause right away. It's important to recognize these signs fast.
According to WebMD Glycerol is a type of naturally occurring alcohol, and it's used in lots of food products. You might find it in protein bars, diet foods, and even sugar-free candies. In slushies, it plays a key role in keeping the drink icy. Usually, slushies use tons of sugar to stop them from freezing completely. But because people are trying to cut back on sugar, companies are using glycerol instead. This is especially true in places with "sugar taxes," where sugary drinks cost more. So, to make sugar-free versions, they add glycerol. This switch means more kids are being exposed to this ingredient, which can be harmful to them.
The study explains that little kids are more at risk from glycerol because their bodies are still growing and developing. Their tiny bodies and young metabolisms might not be able to handle glycerol as well as adults' bodies can. This means that even a small amount can cause a big problem. Also, the amount of glycerol in a slushy can vary, and it's hard to know exactly how much is safe. Factors like how fast they drink it, if they've eaten recently, or if they've been exercising can also make a difference. Even the standard size of a slushy drink can be too much for a small child. This makes it hard to give a safe dose.
Health authorities in the UK and Ireland have already started warning about glycerol in slushies. They suggest that kids under four shouldn't have them at all, and older kids should only have one at most. But doctors are worried that these warnings might not be enough. They point out that it's hard to know how much glycerol is actually in each drink, making it difficult to give safe advice. Parents are being told to be very careful and consider avoiding these drinks altogether for young children. In the US, glycerol is approved for use in food, but parents should still be aware of the potential risks. More research is needed to understand the full impact.
Credit: WHO
Breastfeeding is important not only for babies' health and nutrition but also for protecting mothers from serious diseases, the World Health Organization (WHO) said.
It urged governments to strengthen access to services and interventions that support breastfeeding as part of World Breastfeeding Week, observed annually from August 1–7.
The 2026 theme, "Breastfeeding for a Sustainable Start in Life: Strengthen What Works," focuses on tracking progress, evaluating impact, and scaling proven approaches that improve breastfeeding outcomes.
"Scaling up breastfeeding could prevent almost 400,000 child deaths and around 140,000 maternal deaths each year," said UNICEF Executive Director Catherine Russell and WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus in a joint statement.
"Every US$1 invested in breastfeeding promotion generates an estimated US$59 in economic returns through lower health-care costs, improved cognitive development, higher educational attainment, and increased lifetime earnings," they added.
The experts noted that breastfeeding is one of the simplest and most powerful ways to protect a child's health. It provides infants and young children with essential nutrition, boosts immunity, helps protect against serious illnesses, and supports cognitive development.
For mothers, breastfeeding also offers significant health benefits by reducing the risk of noncommunicable diseases such as breast and ovarian cancers, and type 2 diabetes.
The WHO said breastfeeding rates have improved globally due to sustained investments in policies and programs supporting mothers and families.
Exclusive breastfeeding during the first six months increased from around 37 per cent in 2012 to more than 47 per cent today. Over the past five years, the prevalence of breastfeeding up to two years of age has risen from 38 per cent to 50 per cent.
Despite these gains, the WHO said many countries continue to lag behind global targets.
"Coverage of services supporting breastfeeding remains low, policies are inconsistently enforced, and service quality is often inadequate, especially in low-income, fragile, and humanitarian settings," the WHO said.
The agency noted that cost-effective interventions include skilled breastfeeding support within health systems, community-based counselling, maternity protection policies, and protection from the exploitative marketing of commercial milk formulas.
WHO and UNICEF called on governments, health systems, workplaces, communities, civil society organizations, and families to strengthen the "Warm Chain of Support" for breastfeeding.
During World Breastfeeding Week, the agencies urged countries to:
"Breastfeeding is vital. By investing in proven solutions, we can give every child the best possible start in life and ensure every mother gets the care and services she needs," the agencies said.
Credit: iStock
A new study published in The Lancet Regional Health–Southeast Asia has found that India accounts for 68% of all childhood cancer cases in the SAARC region.
While the country's large child population contributes to the high numbers, experts say underdiagnosis and incomplete cancer registration may mean the actual burden is even greater.
An international team of researchers, including from the US, India, and Canada, estimated that nearly 37,700 children aged up to 14 years were diagnosed with cancer across South Asia in 2022, with 17,700 deaths reported. India alone accounted for an estimated 25,939 cases and 12,028 deaths.
The researchers noted that because cancer registration remains incomplete, particularly in rural areas, the true number of childhood cancer cases in India could exceed 50,000 annually.
India is home to more than 380 million children, accounting for nearly 69% of the child population in the SAARC region. This naturally contributes to the country's higher share of childhood cancer cases and deaths.
However, experts emphasize that population size is only part of the explanation. Delayed diagnosis, limited access to specialized treatment, and gaps in cancer registration continue to affect both disease estimates and patient outcomes.
Dr. Narendra Agrawal, a leading Hematologist and Bone Marrow Transplant Physician and Senior Consultant and Unit Head of Haemato-Oncology at Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute & Research Centre, told HealthandMe that childhood cancer remains a major public health concern in India.
"Current estimates suggest that around 70,000–80,000 children and adolescents develop cancer each year, although the exact number remains uncertain due to expanding cancer registration systems". The most common childhood cancers in India include:
Unlike many adult cancers, most childhood cancers do not have a clearly identifiable or preventable cause. Dr. Agrawal explained that, in most children, cancer develops because of genetic changes that occur during early development. These changes are usually not linked to lifestyle factors or inherited from parents.
Although the causes of most childhood cancers remain unclear, some well-established risk factors include:
Dr. Agrawal said India's substantial childhood cancer burden is largely driven by its population size. However, improving outcomes requires addressing several systemic challenges.
Key issues include:
Credit: AI
For many people, the first thing that comes to their minds when hearing the term “lung cancer” is smoking. Although smoking remains the primary causative factor for this cancer, many other risk factors have been identified that need to be considered.
Lung cancers develop in non-smokers too and form a rather large percentage of all cases. Thus, it is very important to enlighten people about other possible causes of lung cancer.
Second-hand smoking is one of the major risk factors that leads to the development of lung cancer in non-smokers. Exposing oneself to a smoker in your family, workplace, and in your surroundings for a prolonged period of time can result in accumulation of smoke and carcinogens found in cigarette smoke even in a non smoker’s lung.
The other reason for the development of the disease is air pollution which is critically worsening by the day, especially in large cities where the proportion of particulate matter is rising in the air.
Chemical exposure at workplace to harmful substances and carcinogens such as asbestos, silica dust, diesel exhaust, arsenic, and other industrial chemicals also increase the risk. Using protective wear at work is essential in industries dealing with such chemicals is very essential.
The presence of radon gas in some geographical locations is another lesser known cause. Invisible and odorless in nature, exposure to high levels of radon gas has been known to cause lung cancer.
Also read: The 'Safer Than Smoking' Myth? Doctors Warn Vaping May Carry Its Own Lung Cancer Risks
People with a family history of lung cancer in their immediate family could be more prone to developing lung cancer, even without having ever smoked. The factors contributing to this are not hereditary or genetic as directly as other cancers, but more as a result of shared environmental exposure and lifestyle factors.
Certain lung conditions, such as COPD, pulmonary fibrosis, and some long-standing lung infections, can also increase the risk.
Age is another important factor. Lung cancer is more commonly diagnosed in older adults, but it can also occur in younger people. That is why it is important to be aware of the symptoms and seek medical attention early, regardless of age.
Also read: Don't Fear The Biopsy, Fear The Delay
The main problem in diagnosing lung cancer is that this disease has no symptoms until it develops to a certain extent and has symptoms such as coughing persistently, coughing up blood, chest pain, unexplained weight loss, shortness of breath, chest infection, and exhaustion.
None of these symptoms can be ignored as lung cancer can still be treated in its early stages.
Preventing lung cancer entails more than just not smoking. Measures to ensure good air quality at home, to protect against any occupational dangers and hazards, to reduce exposure to air pollutants whenever possible, and to undertake regular health examinations can help in prevention and early detection.
Just as crucial is the awareness of symptoms and the fact that anyone can get lung cancer, including people who have never smoked.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited