Credits: Canva
A recent study suggests that people who donate blood regularly may have genetic changes in their blood that could in fact reduce the risk of developing cancer. It is conducted by the researchers at the Francis Crick Institute, and the study has now provided new insights into how and why blood cancers develop. The study is published in the journal Blood and was conducted by the scientists from Heidelberg and the German Red Cross blood donation center. There is yet a need for further research to confirm these findings.
The researchers examined the blood of two groups of healthy male donors in their 60s:
The goal was to analyze genetic mutations in their blood and assess whether frequent donation had any impact on their genetic makeup.
As and when people age, their blood and other cells naturally develop mutations and some of them can also increase the risk of cancer. When anyone donates blood, his or her body compensates by producing new blood cells, which can influence the genetic diversity of stem cells in the bone marrow. The study also found that both groups had a similar number of mutations. For instance the frequent donors had 217 mutations, while the irregular donors had 212 mutations.
However, the nature of these mutations differed. In the frequent donors, 50% of the mutations were of a type not associated with a high risk of blood cancers, compared to only 30% in the irregular donors.
Further laboratory analysis showed that these specific mutations behaved differently from those linked to leukemia, a type of blood cancer. When human blood stem cells with these mutations were injected into mice, they were found to be highly effective at producing red blood cells, which is considered a positive outcome.
Dr. Hector Huerga Encabo, one of the study authors, emphasized that these mutations do not indicate an increased risk of leukemia. The findings suggest that regular blood donation may influence how stem cells evolve, but whether this translates into a lower cancer risk remains uncertain.
Read More: Who Can Donate Blood To Whom?
One notable disadvantage is the "healthy-donor effect"—because blood donors are often healthier than the general population, their lower cancer risk could be unrelated to blood donation.
Dominique Bonnet, senior researcher and head of a stem-cell laboratory at the Francis Crick Institute, stressed the need for larger studies with female volunteers to confirm the findings.
Despite ongoing research into potential health benefits for donors, the primary goal of blood donation remains saving lives. NHS Blood and Transplant emphasized that while the study is interesting, further research is required to draw firm conclusions. The organization also noted that blood supplies are currently critically low and encouraged eligible individuals to donate.
Also Read: How Long After a Tattoo or Piercing Can I Donate Blood?
Credit: AI
When we think of dialysis, we often picture a machine filtering blood and keeping patients alive. What rarely comes to mind is the small blood vessel in the arm that makes the entire process possible.
For every patient on haemodialysis, the arteriovenous (AV) fistula is quite literally a lifeline. Without it, dialysis cannot be performed effectively. Yet, despite being one of the most important parts of treatment, fistula care remains one of the least understood aspects of kidney disease.
This silent gap in awareness is costing patients their lifeline.
India adds nearly 2.2 lakh new patients with end-stage kidney disease every year, creating a demand for over 3.4 crore dialysis sessions annually.
One of the biggest challenges we see in clinical practice is that patients often seek medical help only after the fistula has already stopped functioning.
The warning signs are usually ignored.
The vibration over the fistula becomes weaker. The arm begins to swell. Bleeding continues longer than usual after dialysis. Needle insertion becomes increasingly difficult. Sometimes dialysis itself becomes less effective.
By the time patients reach an interventional radiologist or vascular specialist, the fistula may already have developed significant narrowing (stenosis) or complete blockage.
Unfortunately, many of these complications are preventable if detected early.
In our experience, nearly 30% of patients eventually lose their fistula because they report too late, when timely intervention could have salvaged access.
Also read: COVID Spikes In India: Experts Allay Fears, Stress Vaccination And Masks
Unlike diabetes or blood pressure, there is no widespread public awareness around fistula surveillance.
Many dialysis patients receive instructions on medicines and dialysis schedules but very little education on how to examine their fistula every day.
There is also no universally implemented patient education protocol across dialysis centres, leading to inconsistent awareness about fistula care.
The result is simple: patients unknowingly damage the very access that keeps them alive.
Patients should examine their fistula daily.
A healthy fistula has a continuous buzzing sensation or “thrill.” If this vibration becomes weak or disappears, medical attention should be sought immediately.
Similarly, swelling of the arm, redness, prolonged bleeding after dialysis, pain around the fistula, or difficulty during needle insertion should never be dismissed as routine.
These are early warning signs - not inconveniences.
Also read: Omicron Sub-Lineages Likely Behind COVID Surge In India: Why Deaths Are Occurring
These small daily habits can often extend the life of a fistula by years.
One of the greatest advances in dialysis access care is that many fistula problems no longer require open surgery.
If narrowing is detected early, minimally invasive image-guided procedures such as fistuloplasty (balloon angioplasty) can restore blood flow, preserve the existing fistula and help patients continue dialysis without interruption.
The key, however, is timing.
A fistula that is evaluated early is often salvageable.
A fistula ignored for weeks may not be.
Every successful fistula represents months of planning, surgery and healing. Losing it means additional procedures, temporary catheters, higher infection risk, increased costs and emotional distress for patients already living with chronic kidney disease.
As doctors, we have become increasingly skilled at creating dialysis access.
The next challenge is ensuring patients know how to protect it.
Because for someone living with kidney failure, the fistula is not just another blood vessel.
It is the lifeline that keeps life moving.
By Dr. Avik Bhattacharyya, Senior Consultant - Interventional Radiology, CK Birla Hospitals, CMRI
Credit: iStock
GLP-1 drugs such as Ozempic, Wegovy, Mounjaro and liraglutide, best known for regulating appetite and aiding weight loss, may also help reduce symptoms of binge eating disorder (BED), which affects more than 17 million people worldwide, according to a new study.
The systematic review and meta-analysis, published in the journal eClinicalMedicine, found that GLP-1 drugs, with semaglutide as its key ingredient, reduced binge eating episodes, loss-of-control eating and emotional eating, highlighting their potential role in treating binge eating disorder alongside obesity.
Binge eating disorder affects over 17 million people globally, and around two-thirds of people with the condition also live with overweight or obesity. It is also common among individuals seeking weight-loss treatment.
"Binge eating disorder, where people regularly eat an excessive amount of food while feeling they have lost control, is common and highly impairing, affecting over 17 million people worldwide," said lead author Dr Ilaria Costantini from the Psychiatry Department at University College London (UCL), UK.
"But treatment options are limited and there are currently no approved medications, so there remains a need for better ways to help people living with this condition. We found evidence that weight loss drugs may help to manage some key symptoms of binge eating disorder," Costantini added.
Also read: Babies Without Vitamin K Shot At Higher Risk Of Brain Bleeding: Study
The researchers analyzed 25 randomized controlled trials conducted across 12 countries on four continents, involving 8,069 participants.
The trials evaluated GLP-1 drugs that target the appetite-regulating hormone GLP-1, including semaglutide (marketed as Ozempic or Wegovy), tirzepatide (Mounjaro) and liraglutide.
These medications suppress appetite by acting on the central nervous system and insulin secretion, delay stomach emptying, and may also influence brain pathways involved in reward and impulse control.
Compared with placebo or other treatments, people taking GLP-1 drugs reported:
Read More: Obesity-Driven CKM Syndrome A Growing Public Health Threat, Warns American Heart Association
The researchers also found that participants taking GLP-1 drugs reported greater cognitive or dietary restraint, meaning they made more deliberate efforts to limit what they ate.
The benefits extended beyond weight loss, with improvements seen in several behaviors associated with binge eating disorder.
While increased dietary restraint was observed, the researchers cautioned that it remains unclear whether this represents healthy self-regulation or a more rigid, potentially harmful eating pattern that could worsen binge eating over time.
"From the evidence available, we cannot say whether the increase in dietary restraint reflects a positive and helpful form of self-regulation or if it is a more dysfunctional pattern of eating. We hope that future research can clarify whether or not taking weight loss drugs might contribute to more pathological forms of eating restriction such as meal skipping," said Izzy Emptage from UCL Psychiatry.
The researchers said GLP-1 drugs could become an important addition to treatment plans for binge eating disorder when used alongside psychological therapies and social support.
However, they also highlighted important limitations. Most of the studies included in the review had a high risk of bias, were funded by pharmaceutical companies, and rarely included participants with a clinical diagnosis of binge eating disorder, reducing the certainty of the findings.
"GLP-1s may offer a promising additional treatment option for people living with both binge eating and obesity," the researchers said, while stressing that these drugs "should not be viewed as a standalone solution to binge eating disorder."
They added that larger, independently funded clinical trials are needed before these medications can be routinely recommended for treating binge eating disorders.
Credit: AI
What if staying younger has less to do with expensive anti-aging products and more to do with spending time appreciating the culture. A new study suggests that regular cultural outings may be linked to slower biological aging.
Expect an unexpected addition to the list of healthy lifestyle habits. Researchers recently found that older adults who frequently visited museums, theaters, cinemas, concerts, and art galleries physically functioned as if they were about three years younger than those who didn’t take part in such activities.
Published in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, the researchers say that cultural interaction appears to be associated with a younger physiological age, although the study does not prove that cultural activities directly contribute to slow aging.
The study analyzed data from 1,899 adults aged 50 years and older who participated in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Participants reported how often they:
Researchers also assessed 10 health indicators, including:
These measures were combined to ascertain each participant's physiological age.
People who participated in cultural activities every few months or more had an average physiological age of 66.9 years, compared with 69.9 years among those with lower levels of cultural engagement, a difference of roughly three biological years.
The researchers also found that every one-point increase in a person's cultural engagement score was associated with approximately a 31-day reduction in physiological age, even after accounting for income, employment, and chronic health conditions.
Although the study wasn't designed to identify a direct cause, the researchers suggest several possible explanations that can help reduce biological age. Cultural activities may help:
Interestingly, the researchers noted that the association between cultural engagement and slower aging was comparable to the benefits seen with frequent physical activity, highlighting that healthy aging may involve much more than exercise alone.
The latest findings add to a growing body of research suggesting that spending time on cultural activities may benefit both the brain and the body as people age.
Previous studies have found that older adults who regularly visit museums, art galleries, theaters, concerts, and similar cultural spots may have a lower risk of dementia, experience slower cognitive decline, and even live longer than those who rarely engage in such activities.
For example, a 2019 study published in The BMJ reported that adults over 50 who participated in cultural activities every few months or more had a 31% lower risk of death during a 14-year follow-up compared with those who never took part.
Another study from University College London found that frequent museum visits were associated with a reduced risk of developing dementia over the following decade.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited