A report by Swachh Bharat Mission says that 74.5 per cent of public places are equipped with toilets. Another report by the Ministry of Jal Shakti states that there are 2.23 lakh Community Sanitary Complexes built across all States and UTs under the Swachh Bharat Mission (SBM) since October 2014. Over 92 lakh toilets have been constructed since the launch of SBM Gramin (SBM (G)) in April 2020.

While toilets are there, are they accessible? This is the question one should ask. The National Family Health Survey (NFHS) focuses on 131 health indicators, but not until the NFHS 5 survey did they include the question of accessibility of toilets in the survey. This happened after the inputs from the Department of Drinking Water and Sanitation (DDWS) and the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare questioned the accessibility.

One might ask, why is the question of accessibility so important? The answer is quite simple. Access to water, sanitation and hygiene is the most basic human need and is also included under the Sustainable Development Goals by the UN.

Are These Numbers Real?

This thought crossed my mind because back in 2021, I went on a solo trip, on a bus to Udaipur from Delhi. There, the bus made two stoppages. This was done so people could get a quick dinner and freshen up, relieve themselves and be prepared for the rest of the journey. This was a nightmare. The bus only stopped for 10 minutes. While some men used the washroom, others went to the bushes.

For the women, there were three cubicles. One of them was broken, and the other one did not have a light bulb, which meant only one was usable. There was a long queue for that cubicle, and time was short. There was no point in trying to find an isolated corner, because it was past midnight, in an unknown area.

I waited anxiously. When finally, my turn came, I saw an overused, dirty washroom. The toilet seat is in a horrible condition. I wanted to touch nothing there. But I had to pee. So, I used my mask to cover my nose from the odour, folded my pants so they did not touch the floor and squatted. It was quite a task to balance.

On my way back to Delhi, I made sure to not drink any water for over a 13-hour bus journey. I dehydrated myself so I did not have to use the washroom. When I did reach, I was severely dehydrated and was sick for three days.

I shared my experience with my friends only to realise that many women have faced the same. There are no washrooms for women.

A friend of mine told me that it is because these roads and dhabas are mainly designed to serve men. They are the ones who travel at night or are on the roads most of the time. As a result, the few women who do travel or are on the road suffer.

Health Risks Women Are Prone To

Well, it is true, but partially. While holding your pee for too long can lead to health risks, peeing on a dirty toilet seat cannot lead to infections unless your urethra is in contact with the bacteria present on that toilet seat. However, nobody wants to sit on a dirty toilet seat, even if you do not get an infection. A safe and hygienic toilet is a basic need.

One of the regular saleswomen, Usha, who visits my house shared her experience with me. “Being on the road constantly means I must use the dirty public washrooms. But I do not want to use them. So, sometimes I ask my regular customers to let me use their washrooms. Some say yes, and some say no. I understand they are also concerned about their safety and privacy,” she says. As a result, Usha spends most of her day not drinking enough water and holding her pee when she is at work. Due to this, she also suffered from a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI).

Her friend, Halima too faced similar problems and due to increased levels of uric acid in her body, she suffered from Hyperuricemia.

Other health risks are kidney stones and other kidney problems, headaches, dull skin, xerostomia or dry mouth, fatigue, and urinary incontinence, which means losing control over your pelvic floor muscles leading to uncontrolled leakage of urine, seizures and weakness.

What Can You Do?

Wear comfortable clothes and capris. Capri pants are comfortable and are short in length, which means this won’t touch the toilet floor when you squat or sit.

Carry Essentials

Even though you cannot get a UTI alone from sitting on a toilet seat, it is always safe to carry a toilet seat sanitiser. If nothing, it can help you get rid of the bad odour so you can use your stand and pee device inside the toilet. You can also use disposable toilet seat covers if your knees are weak, and you cannot squat. Always flush with your seat down.

Always keep disposable gloves, a portable bidet (fill it with water before use), a pocket liquid handwash, wet wipes, tissues and sanitiser handy. Do not forget to keep extra sanitary pads. It might sound a lot, but I promise that it all fits in one pouch. Use this travel-friendly pouch every time you are on the road, or using a public washroom.

What Can We Learn From Others?

However, in case we do not get these technologically advanced toilets here, you can always pack a travel-friendly toilet kit!

As we grow older, it is almost expected that memory will fade. Names slip. Dates blur. Thoughts take longer to form. Inside the aging brain, proteins can misfold and clump together, damaging cells and gradually eroding cognition. But not everyone follows this script.

Some people reach their 80s with memory and mental sharpness that rival those decades younger. Scientists call them “super-agers.” Now, new research published in Nature offers a possible explanation for why some brains hold up so remarkably well.

At the heart of the findings lies one of neuroscience’s most contested questions: can adult human brains grow new neurons?

Read: A Longevity Expert Who Studies 'Super Agers' Eats All THIS In A Day

Can The Aging Brain Grow New Cells?

For years, scientists have debated whether neurogenesis, the birth of new neurons, continues into adulthood. While it is well established in babies and young children, and in many animal species, evidence in adult humans has been mixed.

This new study adds weight to the idea that it does continue, even into advanced age.

Researchers examined brain tissue donated after death from several groups: younger adults with normal cognition, older adults with typical memory for their age, people with mild cognitive impairment, individuals with Alzheimer’s disease, and super-agers over 80 whose memory functioned like someone about 30 years younger.

They focused on the hippocampus, the brain’s memory hub and a region long suspected to be a birthplace for new neurons.

To detect neurogenesis, scientists looked for three types of cells: neural stem cells, neuroblasts, and immature neurons. In simple terms, stem cells are like infants, neuroblasts are adolescents, and immature neurons are on the brink of adulthood.

“We identified genetic markers for three key types of cells,” the researchers explained, tracing the pathway from stem cell to developing neuron.

What Makes Super-Agers Different

All groups showed signs of these cell types. The difference lay in the numbers.

Super-agers had roughly twice as many new neurons as older adults with typical memory, and about two and a half times more than those with Alzheimer’s disease. In fact, their hippocampi contained even more immature neurons than the brains of younger adults.

“This paper shows biological proof that the aging brain is plastic,” Tamar Gefen told The New York Times. She added that this adaptability appears to persist “even into a person’s 80s.”

The immature neurons in super-agers also carried distinctive genetic and epigenetic signatures. According to Gefen, as quoted by The New York Times, “Super-aging happens not only because there’s more of these young cells, but because there is a type of genetic programming” that allows them to survive and resist age-related decline.

In other words, it is not just about quantity. It may also be about resilience.

A Clue For Alzheimer’s Disease?

The Alzheimer’s findings were equally intriguing.

People with Alzheimer’s actually had more neural stem cells than other older adults. But they had far fewer neuroblasts and immature neurons. This suggests that while the starting material was present, the developmental process stalled.

One interpretation is that neurogenesis becomes disrupted in Alzheimer’s. Stem cells may remain dormant, unable to mature into functioning neurons.

“If that’s true, that’s really opened up a new direction for the field,” Hongjun Song told The New York Times, suggesting that reactivating these dormant cells could one day become a therapeutic strategy.

It is an exciting possibility. Instead of only trying to prevent damage, scientists might be able to encourage regeneration.

Not Everyone Is Convinced

The neurogenesis debate is far from settled.

Some researchers argue that methodological differences have led to conflicting conclusions over the years. Shawn Sorrells, who studies neurogenesis, told The New York Times that mapping how the hippocampus changes in people who age differently is “fantastically interesting and important,” but he cautioned that the findings should be validated using additional techniques.

Skepticism remains because detecting new neurons in adult human brains is technically difficult. Results often hinge on the markers and imaging tools used.

What This Means For The Future

Even if this study does not end the debate, it opens new doors. If certain people naturally maintain robust neurogenesis into their 80s, researchers want to understand why. Is it genetics? Lifestyle? A combination of both?

Scientists are now exploring whether the special properties seen in super-agers’ immature neurons can be replicated or supported through medication or other interventions.

The bigger takeaway is hopeful. Aging does not necessarily mean inevitable cognitive collapse. The brain may retain more capacity for renewal than once believed.

If neurogenesis truly persists across the lifespan, the story of brain aging may need rewriting. Instead of focusing only on decline, researchers may increasingly look toward regeneration and resilience.

And for anyone worried about forgetting where they left their keys, that possibility feels quietly revolutionary.

In 2025, Andhra Pradesh reported 1,566 scrub typhus cases, and nine suspected deaths, according to data from the Integrated Health Information Platform, Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP-IHIP) on 8 December. Followed by Karnataka with 1,870 cases, Tamil Nadu 7,308 cases, and Telangana, 309 cases. Scrub typhus cases have significantly increased from previous year. It is one of the deadliest infections affecting multiple organs, or even death. Early it was relevant to poeple working in fields, new studies show it migrating to human settlements.

What Is Scrub Typhus?

Scrub typhus, also known as bush typhus, is a bacterial infection caused by bacteria infection, caused by bacterium Orientia tsutsugamushi. It is spread through bites of infected larval mites, Chiggers.

Most cases of scrub typhus occur in rural areas of Southeast Asia, Indonesia, China, Japan, the Indian subcontinent and northern Australia. Until now, it was believed that chiggers only lurked in the tall grasses of remote paddy fields or dense forests. Due to this, it is commonly known as "farmers' disease", only confined to the fields.

However, new PLOS study data revealed the opposite. The study is led by researchers from Christian Medical College (CMC) Vellore and international collaborators and suggests that the bulk of infections are now even occurring within human settlements.

The study monitored over 32 000 people in Tamil Nadu, which led to the conclusion that agricultural activities, long considered the primary risk factor, were only weakly associated with the disease in high-prevalence areas.

How are Human Settlements A Prime Factor?

Risk for scrub typhus is significantly higher for those living in clustered houses or homes with fewer rooms. If the micro environment around the residence is unmaintained, gardens are patched, or even the damp corners of a courtyard, it could lead to breeding ground for the mites and the rodents that carry Chiggers.

Who Is At Most Risk?

It was once believed that working-age men were the most affected, but the new study tells otherwise. According to the new data, women over 60 are at the highest risk of infection.

As women spend most of their time in and around the home, due to household work, from the kitchen to the laundry, these activities are now the primary cross point of contact with infected mites.

What Is the Risk Factor Of Infection?

As initial symptoms of infection, such as fever, headache, and muscle pain, are the same as viral flu or dengue, many first seek help from untrained practitioners or local pharmacies.

By the time they reach the hospital, the disease has already progressed to severe complications like acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), Kidney failure, or Meningoencephalitis, which is inflammation of your meninges and brain at the same time, a life-threatening condition.

Not only this, the researchers revealed that nearly 10 percent of affected households exceed 25 percent of their income in the treatment.

For severe cases, the cost of treatment can be up to approximately INR 110,000, a staggering sum for rural and peri-urban families earning a fraction of that monthly.

Prevention

• Do not let the grass grow tall around your house
• Tightly maintain kitchen gardens and remove piles of wood or debris where rodents (the primary hosts for mites) might nest.
• As chiggers are usually found close to the ground, do not sit directly on the grass or soil. Use chairs or mats. For children, make them wear socks and full- length trousers while playing in the yard.
• If you notice a small, dark, cigarette-burn-like mark, it is usually left behind by mites. It is most likely "Eschar". It is an important critical clue. As the bite is painless, it often goes unnoticed.
• Do a thorough skin check for an eschar, especially in warm, moist areas like the armpits, groin, or behind the knees.

Early intervention is necessary, as if a fever lasts more than two days, don't just treat it as "seasonal fever".

Consult a qualified doctor and specifically ask about scrub typhus. Infection can be treated with doxycycline common antibiotic, in the early stages. The case fatality rate in this study was 1.5 percent, hospital based studies in South India have previously recorded mortality rates as high 30 percent when treatment is delayed

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommended that vaccine manufacturers must completely change the three viral strains included in the vaccines for the Northern Hemisphere's next influenza season. This is in the backdrop of the new strain called the influenza A (H3N2) or the subclade k, also known as the super flu. This flu season's vaccine was manufactured before the new strain was detected, which is why there was a mismatch. However, this does not mean that the vaccine was ineffective. In order to achieve better immunization, the WHO has asked manufacturer to consider the viral strain for newer vaccines.

The United States also saw a hike in the numbers of flu patients, including hospitalization. As per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the CDC data, the country saw a 48 per cent hospitalization increase in every week.

However, with the US exiting out of the WHO could be a hurdle for the US Foods and Drugs Administration or the FDA to approve the WHO updates. Furthermore, the vaccine overhaul too have removed influenza vaccine from the mandatory coverage.

What Does The New WHO Influenza Vaccine Mean For The US?

The latest flu vaccine recommendations from the World Health Organization come at a politically sensitive moment. They are the first issued since the United States formally withdrew from WHO on January 22. The US has long been one of WHO’s largest contributors, providing more than $680 million annually in recent years, according to the Department of Health and Human Services.

Despite the withdrawal, NPR reported that scientists from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention attended the strain selection meeting virtually. The gathering took place in Istanbul, Turkey.

Daniel Jernigan, former head of the CDC’s National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, said the newly announced vaccine composition underscores why continued engagement with WHO is essential. He noted that flu prevention depends on global cooperation. Through WHO’s network, the CDC gains access to virus samples from around the world, while WHO-affiliated labs benefit from the CDC’s specialized testing capabilities. According to him, the collaboration strengthens both sides.

Concerns had surfaced about how the US exit might disrupt flu vaccine production. Andrew Pekosz, a professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, acknowledged that many researchers were worried about potential ripple effects.

However, two of the strains selected for next fall’s flu vaccines are based on virus samples collected in Missouri and Pennsylvania. That detail suggests that US scientists remain actively involved in surveillance and strain identification. Jernigan pointed out that this is particularly important for improving protection against recently circulating flu B viruses, especially in children. He added that if the CDC were ever prevented from participating in WHO’s network, both the US and international partners would lose valuable data and expertise.

Pekosz explained that the global flu monitoring system was intentionally designed with redundancy. Independent laboratories worldwide collect and analyze viral samples before submitting them to centralized databases. Multiple facilities can grow and test these viruses, ensuring backup capacity if one lab encounters problems. This structure helps safeguard vaccine development from single-point failures.

Danuta Skowronski, MD, a flu researcher at the British Columbia Centre for Disease Control in western Canada, emphasized that these lab networks enable researchers to monitor the genetic makeup of circulating viruses in near real time. Academic centers and vaccine effectiveness networks also contribute data, reinforcing the global surveillance web.

Countries typically look to WHO guidance when deciding their own vaccine formulations. In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration has historically aligned its recommendations with WHO’s selections. The FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee is scheduled to meet March 12 to discuss upcoming flu shot recommendations.

Still, uncertainty remains over how US regulators will proceed. Jernigan questioned whether the FDA will follow WHO’s updates without introducing additional hurdles for manufacturers preparing this fall’s vaccines.

Over the past year, several public health decisions have surprised experts, including shifts in vaccine-related policies. Earlier this month, the FDA initially declined to consider Moderna’s mRNA flu vaccine, a technology that could potentially reduce production time from six months to as little as six to eight weeks. Such speed could allow manufacturers to respond more quickly to late-emerging viral strains. The agency reversed that decision a week later.

Further uncertainty surrounds Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has previously expressed skepticism about vaccines. He has made claims linking flu shots to his own spasmodic dysphonia, though there is no scientific evidence supporting that assertion.

Against this backdrop, experts stress that global coordination remains central to effective influenza prevention, regardless of shifting political landscapes.