Image Credit: Canva
When was the last time you measured your waistline? If you assume that BMI is the only number to focus on when it comes to your health, think twice. New research has revealed a shocking revelation—your waist circumference might be a far better predictor of men's cancer risk than BMI.
The study finds that for each 4-inch increase in waist size, a man's risk of cancer increases by a staggering 25%. Meanwhile, BMI, commonly regarded as the gold standard for assessing obesity, raises cancer risk by only 19% for the same weight gain. So, if you've been dismissing that pesky belly fat, it's time to take notice.
But why is your waistline so important? The reason is visceral fat—the hidden, deep fat that accumulates around your organs. Unlike other body fat, visceral fat is a stealthy troublemaker, causing inflammation, insulin resistance, and abnormal blood fat levels—all of which combine to create a cancer-perfect storm.
Obesity has been associated with an increased risk of numerous health conditions, including cancer, for decades. The research, though, indicates that a specific measure of the body—waist circumference—may be an even more reliable forecaster of cancer risk in men than the more frequently employed Body Mass Index (BMI). This finding emphasizes the need to pay particular attention to the distribution of fat and not merely to the weight of the body.
BMI has been the go-to measure for years for gauging health risks related to obesity. New research, though, that appears in The Journal of the National Cancer Institute indicates that waist measurement is a better predictor of cancer risk in men. According to the research, four more inches (10 cm) around the waist will add 25% to a man's cancer risk. Conversely, a 3.7 kg/m² rise in BMI (from a BMI of 24 to 27.7) increased cancer risk by only 19%.
Why is waist circumference a better predictor, then? Unlike BMI, which measures weight relative to height, waist circumference actually measures abdominal fat—specifically, visceral fat. This type of fat encircles internal organs and is also linked to higher levels of inflammation, insulin resistance, and abnormal blood lipids, all of which are factors in cancer growth. BMI, however, does not measure fat distribution, so two individuals with the same BMI can have very different levels of health risk depending on where fat is deposited on their bodies.
Interestingly, the research identified a significant difference between men and women when it came to waist circumference and cancer risk. Although waist circumference and BMI were linked with obesity-related cancers in women, the relationship was weaker than for men. An increase of 12 cm (4.7 inches) in waist size or a 4.3 rise in BMI (from 24 to 28.3) raised the cancer risk in women by just 13%—a much lower percentage than for men.
Experts credit this difference to the way that fat is stored in the body. Men are more likely to carry fat around the abdomen, especially as visceral fat, which is more metabolically active and associated with cancer-producing biological alterations. Women, by contrast, store fat in peripheral sites such as the hips and thighs, where it is less likely to drive systemic inflammation and metabolic disturbances.
A possible reason is that men tend to depot fat more in the visceral regions, whereas women tend to carry more subcutaneous and peripheral fat," wrote the researchers. "This may render waist circumference a more robust risk factor for cancer in men and account for why waist circumference provides additional risk information beyond BMI in men but not women."
The research used the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) data to define obesity-related cancers. These cancers are esophageal (adenocarcinoma), gastric (cardia), colorectal, rectal, liver, gallbladder, pancreatic, renal, and thyroid cancers, and multiple myeloma and meningioma. In men, abdominal obesity is especially significant in raising the risk of these cancers through high levels of insulin and markers of inflammation.
For women, the research proposes that both waist circumference and hip circumference may give a more accurate estimate of visceral fat and cancer risk. "Adding hip circumference to risk models could strengthen the link between waist circumference and cancer, especially in women," researchers observed.
With these results, doctors advise men to be more mindful of their waistline than only their BMI. Waist size is an easy method to gauge health risk, and its maintenance through lifestyle changes might be the key to cancer prevention.
Track Your Waist Size: Regularly measure your waist circumference and try to keep it in a healthy range (below 40 inches for men, according to medical advice).
Eat a Balanced Diet: A diet containing high fiber, lean protein, and healthy fats can assist in limiting visceral fat gain.
Exercise Consistently: Regular exercise with a combination of aerobic and strength training will help maintain a healthy waistline.
Control Stress and Sleep: Persistent stress and inadequate sleep tend to cause weight gain, especially in the midsection of the body.
Regular Health Screenings: Early identification of cancer risk factors through regular screening can greatly enhance long-term health status.
Credit: iStock
For someone who has been hospitalized with heart failure, going home from the hospital can feel like a turning point. The breathlessness may have eased, the swelling may have reduced, and normalcy returns slowly. But feeling better does not mean that the condition has been cured. However, heart failure is a chronic and progressive condition in which the heart is unable to pump blood effectively enough to meet the body's needs.
The course of heart failure can include periods when patients feel stable and periods when their condition worsens. A worsening episode may require hospitalization or additional treatment, but even after the immediate episode has been stabilized and the patient is discharged, the underlying heart failure remains. The months following discharge from the hospital are a crucial period, when continued treatment, follow-up and attention to changes in symptoms can make a meaningful difference.
People who have recently experienced a heart failure episode are at higher risk of their condition worsening again. The period after discharge should therefore not be viewed simply as a return to normal life, but as a phase when continued monitoring, follow-up and treatment remain important.
The risk is reflected in the outcomes after discharge. Within one year, studies have reported a heart failure readmission rate of nearly 30%, while all-cause mortality was 37%. This highlights why the months following hospitalization require particular attention, even when symptoms have improved.
A heart failure hospitalisation is also an important marker of future outcomes. In patients with recurrent multiple heart failure hospitalizations, the risk of cardiovascular death and all-cause mortality is six times higher in patients with four or more heart failure hospitalisations compared with patients with no heart failure hospitalizations.
This makes preventing another worsening episode an important part of long-term heart failure management.
For example, a patient may return home after treatment feeling less breathless and able to resume a daily routine. If, after some time, the same person begins to struggle with a regular walk, develops increasing ankle swelling, or takes longer to recover from everyday activity, these changes should not be ignored. They may indicate that heart failure is worsening again and should prompt a timely conversation with the doctor.
Recognizing this period of increased vulnerability is not intended to create fear, but to encourage timely care. Patients should take their medicines exactly as prescribed and keep their follow-up appointments. Patients and their families should also be aware of the warning signs that indicate the condition may be worsening. This includes symptoms such as breathlessness; swelling of the legs or ankles; reduced ability to exercise; lack of appetite; nausea; increased heart rate; weight gain from fluid build-up; dizziness; or lightheadedness.
If familiar symptoms return, become more frequent or severe, or begin to affect everyday activities, the doctor should be consulted promptly. Regular follow-ups also provide an opportunity to assess whether the condition remains stable and treatment continues to meet the patient's needs.
Even when patients are stable with current treatment, the risk of hospitalization or serious cardiovascular outcomes can remain. Timely and appropriate treatment, including newer therapeutic approaches where suitable, can help reduce this risk.
Hospitalization following heart failure should not be seen as an episode to recover from, but as a reminder of the need for continued care in the months to follow. Patients and families who understand the warning signs, stay consistent with treatment and follow-up, and consult with the doctor regularly are better placed to manage the risk.
By Dr KV Srikanth, Consultant Interventional Cardiologist, KIMS Hospital, Electronic City, Bengaluru
Credit: AI
Chronic pelvic pain in adulthood may have warning signs that appear much earlier in life. A new study suggested that reproductive and gynecological health problems during adolescence could identify people at higher risk years before chronic pain develops.
The study, carried by The Lancet Regional Health – Americas, analysed health data of nearly half a million people in Ontario, Canada, following them from adolescence into adulthood.
The researchers found that after 10 years into adulthood, chronic pelvic pain affected 28% of people who had sought healthcare for gynecological or reproductive health problems during their teenage years, compared to about 15% among those without such health issues during adolescence.
In a nutshell, the rate of chronic pelvic pain was 41% higher among people who had earlier gynecological or clinical visits due to reproductive issues.
Also read: High BP in Pregnancy Linked to 42,000 Maternal Deaths, 500,000+ Stillbirths, Newborn Deaths: WHO
The researchers used population-based health data held by ICES and followed people from adolescence into adulthood. The analysis also considered other health problems and healthcare use during adolescence.
The findings also indicated that teenagers who had sought care for gynecological or reproductive problems were also more likely to have gastrointestinal problems, mental health conditions and chronic pain in other parts of the body.
“We asked a simple question: Were there signs, years earlier, that someone was on a path toward chronic pelvic pain? This study shows that indeed, the gap between those affected by CPP was already visible early in adulthood and grew over time,” said lead author Shay Freger, a PhD candidate in McMaster University's Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Also read: Childhood Fitness Linked To Lower Risk Of Depression In Adulthood: 30-Year Study
Chronic pelvic pain refers to persistent pain in the lower abdomen or pelvic region that can continue for months or years.
It can affect everyday life, education, work, relationships and mental health. Researchers also identified that pelvic and menstrual symptoms during adolescence can sometimes be dismissed as a normal part of growing up, even when the pain is severe or persistent. This could discourage a person to seek medical help.
The findings suggest that these symptoms could offer doctors and healthcare experts a key opportunity to identify patterns of certain health conditions earlier in life.
“What is important about this study is that the warning signs were not limited to reproductive health alone,” said Mathew Leonardi, senior author and associate professor in McMaster’s Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
“It suggests that adolescent menstrual and pelvic health may be part of a broader health picture that deserves earlier attention and more integrated care.”
The study just noticed an association, but it does not establish that adolescent gynecological or reproductive problems are the direct reasons behind chronic pelvic pain decades later in life.
Instead, the researchers say the findings indicate that healthcare providers may already be seeing patterns during adolescence that could be linked with greater vulnerability to chronic pain and other disorders in adulthood.
The researchers also said that recognising these patterns earlier could help shift pelvic pain care from treating to identifying and addressing problems before they become persistent.
Credit: AI
As pollution season creeps back in Delhi, N95 masks outdoors and air purifiers are once again most likely to become the primary go-to protective measures for the public.
Both are known to lower exposure to harmful particles significantly, but neither can completely nullify the health risks of polluted air. So before you invest in an air purifier or buy a dozen N95 masks, understand how much you will be protected as you step out during smog everyday.
Also read: Delhi Pollution: What Are The Different Types Of Anti-Pollution Masks?
A properly fitted N95 respirator can filter at least 95% of airborne particles under standard environment. That makes it substantially more protective against fine particulate matter like PM2.5 than regular surgical or cloth masks.
But just wearing an N95 does not mean you are breathing toxins-free air. Its effectiveness depends heavily on fit. Gaps around the nose, cheeks or chin can let polluted air to bypass the filter.
An N95 also does not protect equally against every pollutant. It is designed primarily to filter particles, not gases like nitrogen dioxide or ozone. So if you spend most of your time outdoors during severe pollution, wear a well-fitted, certified respirator to reduce exposure.
Protection from PM2.5 is key as these particles are small enough to seep deep into your lungs and, in some circumstances, even cross over to enter the bloodstream. Long-term exposure to PM2.5 has been associated with cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease and other serious health problems.
The effectiveness of an air purifier depends significantly on the purifier, the size of the room and how it is used. A purifier equipped with a HEPA filter can remove fine particles from indoor air. When outdoor PM2.5 levels are high and polluted air enters homes through windows, doors and ventilation systems, this could be one of the best ways to protect yourself.
However, simply switching on a purifier in a large room does not guarantee clean air. The purifier needs to have sufficient clean air delivery rate (CADR) for the size of the room.
Keeping doors and windows closed during periods of extreme outdoor pollution can also help reduce the amount of polluted air entering. Filters need to be replaced according to the manufacturer's recommendations because a heavily loaded filter can reduce performance.
Also read: Delhi Air Pollution Is Back: What Days Of Poor AQI Can Do to Your Lungs
One of the limitations is that HEPA filtration primarily addresses particles. A purifier needs additional technologies, like an activated-carbon filter, to reduce some gaseous pollutants, and even then it cannot remove every pollutant completely.
For Delhi's pollution season, these two measures address different exposure issues. N95 masks help reduce inhalation of polluted particles while outdoors. Air purifiers help lower indoor concentrations of particulate matter. Using both can therefore provide greater protection than relying on either measure alone.
People with asthma, COPD, heart disease or other respiratory and cardiovascular conditions, as well as children and older adults, can be more vulnerable to the effects of air pollution.
Even healthy people can experience symptoms like coughing, throat irritation, wheezing, eye irritation and breathing discomfort when pollution levels rise.
© $2026 Times Horizon Private Limited