Image Credit: Canva
When was the last time you measured your waistline? If you assume that BMI is the only number to focus on when it comes to your health, think twice. New research has revealed a shocking revelation—your waist circumference might be a far better predictor of men's cancer risk than BMI.
The study finds that for each 4-inch increase in waist size, a man's risk of cancer increases by a staggering 25%. Meanwhile, BMI, commonly regarded as the gold standard for assessing obesity, raises cancer risk by only 19% for the same weight gain. So, if you've been dismissing that pesky belly fat, it's time to take notice.
But why is your waistline so important? The reason is visceral fat—the hidden, deep fat that accumulates around your organs. Unlike other body fat, visceral fat is a stealthy troublemaker, causing inflammation, insulin resistance, and abnormal blood fat levels—all of which combine to create a cancer-perfect storm.
Obesity has been associated with an increased risk of numerous health conditions, including cancer, for decades. The research, though, indicates that a specific measure of the body—waist circumference—may be an even more reliable forecaster of cancer risk in men than the more frequently employed Body Mass Index (BMI). This finding emphasizes the need to pay particular attention to the distribution of fat and not merely to the weight of the body.
BMI has been the go-to measure for years for gauging health risks related to obesity. New research, though, that appears in The Journal of the National Cancer Institute indicates that waist measurement is a better predictor of cancer risk in men. According to the research, four more inches (10 cm) around the waist will add 25% to a man's cancer risk. Conversely, a 3.7 kg/m² rise in BMI (from a BMI of 24 to 27.7) increased cancer risk by only 19%.
Why is waist circumference a better predictor, then? Unlike BMI, which measures weight relative to height, waist circumference actually measures abdominal fat—specifically, visceral fat. This type of fat encircles internal organs and is also linked to higher levels of inflammation, insulin resistance, and abnormal blood lipids, all of which are factors in cancer growth. BMI, however, does not measure fat distribution, so two individuals with the same BMI can have very different levels of health risk depending on where fat is deposited on their bodies.
Interestingly, the research identified a significant difference between men and women when it came to waist circumference and cancer risk. Although waist circumference and BMI were linked with obesity-related cancers in women, the relationship was weaker than for men. An increase of 12 cm (4.7 inches) in waist size or a 4.3 rise in BMI (from 24 to 28.3) raised the cancer risk in women by just 13%—a much lower percentage than for men.
Experts credit this difference to the way that fat is stored in the body. Men are more likely to carry fat around the abdomen, especially as visceral fat, which is more metabolically active and associated with cancer-producing biological alterations. Women, by contrast, store fat in peripheral sites such as the hips and thighs, where it is less likely to drive systemic inflammation and metabolic disturbances.
A possible reason is that men tend to depot fat more in the visceral regions, whereas women tend to carry more subcutaneous and peripheral fat," wrote the researchers. "This may render waist circumference a more robust risk factor for cancer in men and account for why waist circumference provides additional risk information beyond BMI in men but not women."
The research used the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) data to define obesity-related cancers. These cancers are esophageal (adenocarcinoma), gastric (cardia), colorectal, rectal, liver, gallbladder, pancreatic, renal, and thyroid cancers, and multiple myeloma and meningioma. In men, abdominal obesity is especially significant in raising the risk of these cancers through high levels of insulin and markers of inflammation.
For women, the research proposes that both waist circumference and hip circumference may give a more accurate estimate of visceral fat and cancer risk. "Adding hip circumference to risk models could strengthen the link between waist circumference and cancer, especially in women," researchers observed.
With these results, doctors advise men to be more mindful of their waistline than only their BMI. Waist size is an easy method to gauge health risk, and its maintenance through lifestyle changes might be the key to cancer prevention.
Track Your Waist Size: Regularly measure your waist circumference and try to keep it in a healthy range (below 40 inches for men, according to medical advice).
Eat a Balanced Diet: A diet containing high fiber, lean protein, and healthy fats can assist in limiting visceral fat gain.
Exercise Consistently: Regular exercise with a combination of aerobic and strength training will help maintain a healthy waistline.
Control Stress and Sleep: Persistent stress and inadequate sleep tend to cause weight gain, especially in the midsection of the body.
Regular Health Screenings: Early identification of cancer risk factors through regular screening can greatly enhance long-term health status.
Credit: iStock
Vitiligo is an acquired disorder of depigmentation characterized by white patches on the body. It affects all races. There is a lot of stigma associated with the disease due to disfigurement. The affected persons suffer from psychological distress, low self-esteem, and social neglect. Inadequate knowledge and age-old misconceptions are the key reasons for this undue apprehension associated with this condition.
Common Myths About Vitiligo
There is a misconception that vitiligo can spread by contact. However, vitiligo is non-contagious and does not spread by contact.
Another misconception is that sour food causes vitiligo, which is not scientifically proven. It cannot be transmitted through contact, shared items, or proximity. It is not caused by bacterial, viral, or other infectious agents. It tends to be more noticeable in people with darker skin, due to higher contrast between affected and unaffected areas.
There is no significant variation in people of different races, religions, and socio-economic status for predisposition to vitiligo. There is another myth that vitiligo and leprosy are the same, as both present with white skin.
The exact cause is multifactorial, with hypotheses based on genetic—autoimmune, neural, and biochemical theories. There is a role of acquired factors like stress and infections in its clinical expression. It is associated with other autoimmune disorders like diabetes mellitus, alopecia areata, Addison's disease, and thyroid disorders.
The course of the disease is unpredictable. If you notice any skin discoloration, reach out to a dermatologist for early diagnosis and treatment.
Bust the myths about vitiligo with proper information regarding the condition.
By proper public awareness, the social stigma associated with the condition can be debunked. A qualified dermatologist can diagnose the condition with medical history, Wood's lamp examination, and blood tests to rule out other autoimmune diseases.
There is no cure for vitiligo, but treatment to restore pigmentation and to prevent progression of the disease can be done. Counseling and support groups to help patients with this disorder can make a meaningful difference.
(Dr. Saji Firoz, Consultant, Dermatology & Cosmetology, KIMSHEALTH, Thiruvananthapuram)
Credit: iStock
Fentanyl is an FDA-approved, quick-acting narcotic painkiller that is nearly 100 times more potent than morphine and 50 times stronger than heroin. While it has important medical uses, widespread illicit use has created a public health crisis, with researchers now warning that commonly used addiction treatments are struggling to keep pace.
A study by researchers at the University of California, Los Angeles, found that people who regularly use illicit fentanyl consume opioid doses equivalent to morphine levels hundreds of times higher than the fentanyl doses used in hospitals—far beyond what current addiction treatment protocols were designed to address.
Published in the journal Drug and Alcohol Dependence, the findings suggest these extreme exposure levels contribute to high opioid tolerance, making medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) less effective and increasing overdose risk.
Although methadone and buprenorphine remain highly effective at reducing overdose deaths, many patients have struggled to start and remain on treatment since fentanyl replaced heroin as the dominant illicit opioid in the US because of the severity of fentanyl withdrawal, the team said.
The researchers estimated fentanyl exposure using morphine milligram equivalence (MME), a standardized measure that compares the potency of different opioids.
The analysis combined purity data from more than 500 fentanyl samples collected by Drug Checking Los Angeles between September 2023 and January 2026 with surveys of 47 people who regularly used fentanyl.
The researchers estimated that participants consumed an average of 8,887 MME per day.
According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), just 2 mg of fentanyl can be lethal for an opioid-naïve person. The study found that the average fentanyl user in Los Angeles consumes roughly 60 times that amount each day.
Tolerance develops not only to the drug's intoxicating effects but also to the respiratory depression that causes overdose, said Dr. Chelsea Shover, associate professor in the Department of Health Policy and Management.
"Now, we find that people are regularly exposed to doses of opioids that would have seemed impossible to me before I started this work," Shover said.
"To put it in perspective, in hospital settings, fentanyl is often dosed in 100-microgram vials. One gram of average-purity fentanyl that we tested had a dose equivalent to more than 1,200 of these vials. So people are getting daily doses that are on par with injecting hundreds of the hospital vials or taking 440 Percocet pills."
According to the researchers, the potency and variability of illicit fentanyl mean that people are consuming opioid doses far beyond what existing treatment protocols were designed to manage.
"Of course, starting MOUD is going to be harder for fentanyl than it is for heroin," Shover said.
"This study is a great example of where our science was directly informed by lived experience. It is a call to take withdrawal management seriously, with adjuvant therapies, and compassionate approaches."
As a fully synthetic drug, fentanyl is cheaper and easier to produce than heroin. Its high potency also increases the risk of unintentionally consuming dangerous amounts, raising the likelihood of overdose.
"It's no longer, 'how do we treat someone who smokes a gram of fentanyl per day,' it's 'how do we treat someone using thousands of MMEs of oral morphine in fentanyl per day?' That question and its answers feel more accessible, less abstract to clinicians," Shover said.
The study reinforces concerns among addiction experts that standard treatment regimens for opioid addiction may no longer adequately address patients with extremely high fentanyl tolerance.
Current doses of medications such as buprenorphine and methadone were originally developed to treat heroin and prescription opioid addiction. The findings add to growing calls from clinicians to update treatment guidelines to reflect today's illicit fentanyl market.
"When patients say their withdrawal is not being treated well, it's important to listen," Shover said.

Credit: AI-generated image
Athletes who spend years training their bodies undergo remarkable physiological changes. Athlete's heart is one of them. It becomes stronger, more efficient, and sometimes even larger. This natural adaptation is known as athlete's heart, a condition that is completely normal in most cases but can occasionally resemble serious heart disease.
Understanding the difference between a healthy athletic heart and an underlying cardiac disorder is crucial, especially as awareness grows around sudden cardiac deaths in young athletes.
HealthandMe spoke to Dr. Ruchit Shah, Interventional Cardiologist at Saifee Hospital, Mumbai, who said, “If a person exercises too much, normally more than 60 minutes in most days of the week for a prolonged period of time, the body's need for oxygen and for blood to supply the oxygen rises significantly. This can often be seen in the very intense training regimens of competitive athletes. The heart muscle responds to this extra demand by getting "conditioned" and thickening with time.”
Just like skeletal muscles that get bigger and thicker and with training and exercise, the heart muscle can get bigger and thicker too.
Athlete's heart is usually characterised by a “conditioned heart rate”. People with athlete's hearts will now show symptoms or serious warning signs and thereby won't need a specific treatment for the condition.
Also read: Illinois Governor Claims Trump Continues To Suffer From Dementia
Signs include:
The expert also says that athlete's heart is different from serious cardiac diseases like cardiomyopathies, especially hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM).
He says, “HOCM is a serious disease, with heart muscle thickening also occurring and causing the left ventricular cavity to narrow. The left ventricle's outflow tract can also become obstructed from this excessive thickening. Athletes with HOCM have a risk of sudden cardiac arrest and death, unlike athletes with athlete's heart.”
An athlete‘s heart, by itself, is considered a benign physiological adaptation and does not require medical intervention.
However, it becomes important to investigate further if an athlete experiences:
Ignoring these warning signs can delay the diagnosis of potentially serious cardiac conditions. Those who have an athlete’s heart must get periodic cardiac evaluation, do a temporary reduction in training if the diagnosis remains uncertain, and monitor when minor abnormalities are present.
Athlete's heart is proof of the body's extraordinary ability to adapt to sustained physical activity. For most athletes, it represents a healthy, efficient cardiovascular system rather than a medical problem. The challenge lies in distinguishing these normal adaptations from potentially dangerous heart conditions that can look remarkably similar.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited