When was the last time you measured your waistline? If you assume that BMI is the only number to focus on when it comes to your health, think twice. New research has revealed a shocking revelation—your waist circumference might be a far better predictor of men's cancer risk than BMI.

The study finds that for each 4-inch increase in waist size, a man's risk of cancer increases by a staggering 25%. Meanwhile, BMI, commonly regarded as the gold standard for assessing obesity, raises cancer risk by only 19% for the same weight gain. So, if you've been dismissing that pesky belly fat, it's time to take notice.

But why is your waistline so important? The reason is visceral fat—the hidden, deep fat that accumulates around your organs. Unlike other body fat, visceral fat is a stealthy troublemaker, causing inflammation, insulin resistance, and abnormal blood fat levels—all of which combine to create a cancer-perfect storm.

Obesity has been associated with an increased risk of numerous health conditions, including cancer, for decades. The research, though, indicates that a specific measure of the body—waist circumference—may be an even more reliable forecaster of cancer risk in men than the more frequently employed Body Mass Index (BMI). This finding emphasizes the need to pay particular attention to the distribution of fat and not merely to the weight of the body.

BMI has been the go-to measure for years for gauging health risks related to obesity. New research, though, that appears in The Journal of the National Cancer Institute indicates that waist measurement is a better predictor of cancer risk in men. According to the research, four more inches (10 cm) around the waist will add 25% to a man's cancer risk. Conversely, a 3.7 kg/m² rise in BMI (from a BMI of 24 to 27.7) increased cancer risk by only 19%.

Why is waist circumference a better predictor, then? Unlike BMI, which measures weight relative to height, waist circumference actually measures abdominal fat—specifically, visceral fat. This type of fat encircles internal organs and is also linked to higher levels of inflammation, insulin resistance, and abnormal blood lipids, all of which are factors in cancer growth. BMI, however, does not measure fat distribution, so two individuals with the same BMI can have very different levels of health risk depending on where fat is deposited on their bodies.

Why Men Are at Higher Risk?

Interestingly, the research identified a significant difference between men and women when it came to waist circumference and cancer risk. Although waist circumference and BMI were linked with obesity-related cancers in women, the relationship was weaker than for men. An increase of 12 cm (4.7 inches) in waist size or a 4.3 rise in BMI (from 24 to 28.3) raised the cancer risk in women by just 13%—a much lower percentage than for men.

Experts credit this difference to the way that fat is stored in the body. Men are more likely to carry fat around the abdomen, especially as visceral fat, which is more metabolically active and associated with cancer-producing biological alterations. Women, by contrast, store fat in peripheral sites such as the hips and thighs, where it is less likely to drive systemic inflammation and metabolic disturbances.

A possible reason is that men tend to depot fat more in the visceral regions, whereas women tend to carry more subcutaneous and peripheral fat," wrote the researchers. "This may render waist circumference a more robust risk factor for cancer in men and account for why waist circumference provides additional risk information beyond BMI in men but not women."

Cancer Types Most Linked to Abdominal Fat

The research used the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) data to define obesity-related cancers. These cancers are esophageal (adenocarcinoma), gastric (cardia), colorectal, rectal, liver, gallbladder, pancreatic, renal, and thyroid cancers, and multiple myeloma and meningioma. In men, abdominal obesity is especially significant in raising the risk of these cancers through high levels of insulin and markers of inflammation.

For women, the research proposes that both waist circumference and hip circumference may give a more accurate estimate of visceral fat and cancer risk. "Adding hip circumference to risk models could strengthen the link between waist circumference and cancer, especially in women," researchers observed.

What This Means for Men's Health and Cancer Prevention?

With these results, doctors advise men to be more mindful of their waistline than only their BMI. Waist size is an easy method to gauge health risk, and its maintenance through lifestyle changes might be the key to cancer prevention.

How To Reduce Cancer Risk In Men?

Track Your Waist Size: Regularly measure your waist circumference and try to keep it in a healthy range (below 40 inches for men, according to medical advice).

Eat a Balanced Diet: A diet containing high fiber, lean protein, and healthy fats can assist in limiting visceral fat gain.

Exercise Consistently: Regular exercise with a combination of aerobic and strength training will help maintain a healthy waistline.

Control Stress and Sleep: Persistent stress and inadequate sleep tend to cause weight gain, especially in the midsection of the body.

Regular Health Screenings: Early identification of cancer risk factors through regular screening can greatly enhance long-term health status.

Waking up at night can make it difficult to fall back asleep, especially when the mind becomes alert and starts racing. Neuroscientist Andrew Huberman has suggested a simple eye-movement routine that he says may help people drift back to sleep. But does it actually work?

How Does Andrew Huberman’s Sleep Trick Work?

The routine is performed with the eyes closed:

• Slowly move the eyes to one side, then the other, followed by up and down.

• Trace a circle with the eyes, first counterclockwise and then clockwise.

• Point the eyes toward the nose and take a long exhale.

Huberman suggests repeating the sequence two to three times.

His theory is that the movements may interact with brain circuits involved in tracking the body's position, including pathways involving the eyes, brainstem and cerebellum.

Also read: Struggling With Sleep? Neurologist Shares 3 Simple Tips For Better Sleep Health

Sleep Experts Say The Idea Is Unproven

Shelby Harris, a psychologist and board-certified sleep expert, says there are reasonable grounds to try it, Women's World magazine reported.

“I think it’s a very reasonable thing to try. It’s free, low effort, carries essentially no risk and has solid reasons it could help,” Harris was quoted as saying.

She notes that sleep tends to become more fragmented with age.

“Sleep naturally becomes more fragmented with age, with less time in deep sleep and more time in the lighter stages where it’s easy to wake up,” Harris said.

Hormonal changes with age can also contribute to more fragile sleep in women. But a plausible explanation does not mean the technique has been proven.

Michael Grandner, a clinical psychologist and sleep researcher at the University of Arizona, told Inc.com that eye movements, balance signals, the brainstem and cerebellum all contribute to how the brain tracks the body's position in space.

However, he said he is “not aware of studies that have directly tested that chain of events, or clinical trials showing that this particular eye-movement exercise reliably shortens sleep onset.”

Brant Hasler, co-director of the Behavioral Sleep Medicine Training Program at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, added that the technique does not resemble a validated behavioral sleep intervention.

A Relaxing Technique Not A Treatment

According to Grandner, the exercise may be better understood as a relaxation or focused-attention technique.

He said he would place it “closer to a relaxation, focused-attention, or mindfulness exercise than to an established treatment for insomnia.”

The repetitive movements could give the mind something neutral to focus on instead of worrying, planning for the next day or checking whether sleep has returned.

Further, Hasler said bedtime activities can be useful when they occupy the mind without becoming stimulating. The eye exercise could work in that way, he said, “regardless of any additional effects via proprioception.”

The slow breathing paired with the exercise may also help with relaxation.

It Could Backfire If You Try Too Hard

Hasler said expectancy effects could explain some positive experiences with the technique. Grandner also cautioned against repeatedly checking whether the trick is working.

If the exercise becomes another task to perform perfectly, “it could become another form of sleep effort, which can actually perpetuate insomnia,” he said.

Rabies is most often associated with dog-mediated transmission in humans, but the virus can infect a wide range of mammals. In 2026, unusual cases involving farm goats, beavers and Cape fur seals raised fresh questions about how rabies moves between species.

Since July 2026, multiple US jurisdictions have reported human rabies exposures involving known rabies vectors or animals in which rabies is less commonly reported. The CDC issued a health advisory on September 10 “in response to recent reports of increases in human exposures to rabid or possibly rabid animals.”

The concern is not limited to North America. At least 176 people had been bitten by rabid Cape fur seals along South Africa’s coastline by the end of 2025, while researchers have warned that the disease could spread to other marine mammal species.

In North Carolina in 2026, a wild skunk entered a pen containing baby goats, some of which later tested positive for rabies. Of the 284 people evaluated by local health departments, post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) was recommended for 213. In Maryland, a 13-year-old boy was attacked by a beaver while swimming at a state park and required surgery for his injuries.

These cases raise a bigger question: Are unusual infections simply spillover from established rabies hosts, or can the virus establish sustained transmission in a new species? To understand this better, HealthandMe spoke to two experts.

Also read: US CDC Warns Of Rising Human Rabies Exposure Risk: How To Stay Safe

Are These New Rabies Hosts Or Spillover?

Dr Anish T S, Professor at the School of Public Health, Kerala University of Health Sciences, told HealthandMe that rabies can infect mammals, but an infected animal is not necessarily a reservoir host.

Genetic sequencing can help establish where an unusual infection came from and whether the virus is changing.

“So one thing that we can do is genetic analysis. If we are able to pick up these animals infected by rabies, we find what kind of rabies virus it is and do maybe a sequencing of the genome of this virus.”

“These kinds of analysis could be done still, but it is a question that whether this particular virus is changing its host or the virus is accumulating some kind of genetic mutations so that it can get maybe involved with some other animals. It can choose some other animals also as their host. It is actually a very pertinent question.”

The Cape fur seal cases add another dimension to this question, with sustained rabies transmission reported within the marine mammal population.

What Happens After Exposure?

Dr NK Ganguly, former Director General of the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), told HealthandMe that rabies in goats is rare, while beaver exposures need particular caution.

“Beaver is one animal where we have to be very careful.”

Dr Anish said rabies can also present as paralytic or “dumb” rabies, which may not show classic signs and could lead people to handle or treat an infected animal without recognizing the risk.

Dr Ganguly stressed the need for prompt medical care after exposure.

“The rabies incubation period is around 10 days. So if somebody has been exposed, they should be immediately vaccinated. And if the exposure is with a bite or something at the upper limbs, then they need to be given an antiserum as well as vaccinated.”

“So depending on the exposure, you are given a vaccine which is available, and you are also given the cocktail of antibodies, the monoclonal antibodies, which act immediately.”

Why Wildlife And Livestock Surveillance Matters

Read More: Rabies Day Exclusive: ‘We Need To Target The Source’ For A Rabies-Free India By 2030, Says Veterinary Epidemiologist

Dr Ganguly said rabies can also circulate in wild and feral animals, including foxes, while cats and other species can also be infected.

He said surveillance should extend beyond dogs to domestic animals that are in close contact with them and to wildlife where feasible.

“Surveillance should include domestic animals also which are in close contact with the dogs.”

“There should be surveillance. There should be sentinel surveillance. We should carry out, if it is affordable.”

He also pointed to dog vaccination and sterilization, as well as bait vaccination for wildlife and stray animals.

Could The Virus Be Changing?

Dr Anish said unusual infections need investigation to determine whether they are isolated spillover events or linked to changes in the virus.

“The real issue is if the virus is changing much because of mutations. Because rabies virus is not that much notorious for mutations. That is why most of our vaccines are working.”

He said genetic studies could help answer whether existing vaccines and treatments would remain effective if significant mutations emerge.

“So the genetic studies of the virus may give us the answers to these questions.”

India’s Rabies Elimination Challenge

For India, the experts said the priority remains breaking established dog-mediated transmission chains before focusing on less common pathways.

“If you just look at the rabies situation in India, we are not even able to manage the pure dog-mediated rabies. That is, people are bitten by rabid dogs and people are getting infected, and we are not able to have maybe full coverage of vaccination, and all the other things are actually the biggest concern,” Dr Anish said.

Dr Ganguly added that surveillance should include domestic animals also which are in close contact with the dogs.

"But essentially, in the urban areas, the dog is the main animal, and we should—the Supreme Court has given now a lot of directions in this particular regard—that the dogs may be sterilized," the expert said.

The pet dogs need to be vaccinated and other stray dogs should be taken to facilities where they need to be sterilized and they need to be vaccinated, the experts said.

The current treatment course for high cholesterol is taking a daily tablet or regular injections over a long period. But instead, could a single treatment change the way high cholesterol is treated?

This possibility is being explored after a small first-in-human trial conducted by Cleveland Clinic found that one infusion of an experimental CRISPR gene-editing therapy lowered LDL, also called bad cholesterol, by about half and that the effect was still present a year later.

The treatment, called CTX310, is still experimental. The study involved just 15 people, so the findings are premature, not evidence that CRISPR can replace statins or other cholesterol medications.

About The Study

The Phase 1 trial included people with lipid disorders who had not responded adequately to existing medications.

Participants received a single infusion of CTX310, at different doses, and researchers followed them for 12 months.

At the highest dose, LDL cholesterol was reduced by 52.5% after one year, while triglycerides fell by 47.8%. The reductions seen earlier in the trial therefore persisted for at least 12 months.

Additionally, no serious adverse side effects related to the treatment were reported during the one-year follow-up. However, the researchers plan to continue monitoring participants for 15 years, as recommended for gene-editing therapies.

Also read: Inflammation May Be Quietly Changing Your Heart: Study Finds 43% Higher Risk Of Heart Attack & Stroke

How Does The CRISPR Treatment Work?

CTX310 operates differently compared to conventional cholesterol medicines. The treatment uses CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing to target ANGPTL3, a gene involved in regulating fats circulating in the blood.

The therapy delivers the gene-editing machinery to the liver, where it switches off ANGPTL3. Lower activity of this gene can reduce levels of LDL cholesterol and triglycerides.

The idea is that instead of using daily medicines to keep cholesterol in check, doctors could make a long-lasting genetic change.

Also read: Preeclampsia May End With Pregnancy. Your Heart Risk May Not

What Does It Mean For Statins?

Statins remain a reliable treatment approach for lowering LDL cholesterol and reducing cardiovascular risk. CTX310 has only been tested in a very small Phase 1 trial. Also, the study was primarily designed to examine the safety and explore whether the gene-editing treatment could produce a meaningful effect.

The fact that LDL remained lower after one year is promising and encouraging, but researchers still need to determine whether the treatment can safely maintain its effects over many years and, crucially, whether it reduces heart attacks, strokes and other cardiovascular events.

There is also a fundamental difference between cholesterol tablets and permanently altering a person’s DNA.

Promising Cholesterol Treatment Approach

High cholesterol is often a long-term condition. Depending on their risk, patients may need cholesterol-lowering treatment for many years.

If CRISPR becomes a reality, people may no longer have to stick to a chronic treatment strategy for managing cholesterol.

"Building upon the initial data presented in November 2025, the durability of the lipid-lowering effect was impressive," said Cleveland Clinic cardiologist Luke Laffin, M.D., first author of the study. "It is encouraging that there were no serious safety events related to CTX310 in the trial and in the year following treatment. We look forward to continuing to investigate this therapy in a larger number of patients."