Image Credit: Canva
When was the last time you measured your waistline? If you assume that BMI is the only number to focus on when it comes to your health, think twice. New research has revealed a shocking revelation—your waist circumference might be a far better predictor of men's cancer risk than BMI.
The study finds that for each 4-inch increase in waist size, a man's risk of cancer increases by a staggering 25%. Meanwhile, BMI, commonly regarded as the gold standard for assessing obesity, raises cancer risk by only 19% for the same weight gain. So, if you've been dismissing that pesky belly fat, it's time to take notice.
But why is your waistline so important? The reason is visceral fat—the hidden, deep fat that accumulates around your organs. Unlike other body fat, visceral fat is a stealthy troublemaker, causing inflammation, insulin resistance, and abnormal blood fat levels—all of which combine to create a cancer-perfect storm.
Obesity has been associated with an increased risk of numerous health conditions, including cancer, for decades. The research, though, indicates that a specific measure of the body—waist circumference—may be an even more reliable forecaster of cancer risk in men than the more frequently employed Body Mass Index (BMI). This finding emphasizes the need to pay particular attention to the distribution of fat and not merely to the weight of the body.
BMI has been the go-to measure for years for gauging health risks related to obesity. New research, though, that appears in The Journal of the National Cancer Institute indicates that waist measurement is a better predictor of cancer risk in men. According to the research, four more inches (10 cm) around the waist will add 25% to a man's cancer risk. Conversely, a 3.7 kg/m² rise in BMI (from a BMI of 24 to 27.7) increased cancer risk by only 19%.
Why is waist circumference a better predictor, then? Unlike BMI, which measures weight relative to height, waist circumference actually measures abdominal fat—specifically, visceral fat. This type of fat encircles internal organs and is also linked to higher levels of inflammation, insulin resistance, and abnormal blood lipids, all of which are factors in cancer growth. BMI, however, does not measure fat distribution, so two individuals with the same BMI can have very different levels of health risk depending on where fat is deposited on their bodies.
Interestingly, the research identified a significant difference between men and women when it came to waist circumference and cancer risk. Although waist circumference and BMI were linked with obesity-related cancers in women, the relationship was weaker than for men. An increase of 12 cm (4.7 inches) in waist size or a 4.3 rise in BMI (from 24 to 28.3) raised the cancer risk in women by just 13%—a much lower percentage than for men.
Experts credit this difference to the way that fat is stored in the body. Men are more likely to carry fat around the abdomen, especially as visceral fat, which is more metabolically active and associated with cancer-producing biological alterations. Women, by contrast, store fat in peripheral sites such as the hips and thighs, where it is less likely to drive systemic inflammation and metabolic disturbances.
A possible reason is that men tend to depot fat more in the visceral regions, whereas women tend to carry more subcutaneous and peripheral fat," wrote the researchers. "This may render waist circumference a more robust risk factor for cancer in men and account for why waist circumference provides additional risk information beyond BMI in men but not women."
The research used the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) data to define obesity-related cancers. These cancers are esophageal (adenocarcinoma), gastric (cardia), colorectal, rectal, liver, gallbladder, pancreatic, renal, and thyroid cancers, and multiple myeloma and meningioma. In men, abdominal obesity is especially significant in raising the risk of these cancers through high levels of insulin and markers of inflammation.
For women, the research proposes that both waist circumference and hip circumference may give a more accurate estimate of visceral fat and cancer risk. "Adding hip circumference to risk models could strengthen the link between waist circumference and cancer, especially in women," researchers observed.
With these results, doctors advise men to be more mindful of their waistline than only their BMI. Waist size is an easy method to gauge health risk, and its maintenance through lifestyle changes might be the key to cancer prevention.
Track Your Waist Size: Regularly measure your waist circumference and try to keep it in a healthy range (below 40 inches for men, according to medical advice).
Eat a Balanced Diet: A diet containing high fiber, lean protein, and healthy fats can assist in limiting visceral fat gain.
Exercise Consistently: Regular exercise with a combination of aerobic and strength training will help maintain a healthy waistline.
Control Stress and Sleep: Persistent stress and inadequate sleep tend to cause weight gain, especially in the midsection of the body.
Regular Health Screenings: Early identification of cancer risk factors through regular screening can greatly enhance long-term health status.
Credit: BBC
BBC News presenter Maryam Moshiri has opened up about her experience of living with an incurable blood cancer for the past two years.
Moshiri, 49, was diagnosed with Polycythemia Vera (PV) in November 2024. The condition affects the bone marrow and causes the blood to become thicker than normal.
While undergoing treatment, Moshiri has continued to work and has spoken about the challenges of managing her condition alongside her career.
“I love what I do. I love being where the story is. I don’t want to allow blood cancer to stop me from doing my work,” she told The Times.
Moshiri’s treatment involves having blood removed to reduce the concentration of red blood cells, a procedure that can leave her feeling exhausted.
She has also opened up about the challenges of continuing to work while experiencing fatigue related to her cancer treatment.
“I was working 14-hour days, constantly on air, constantly having to think on my feet, and holding it together, despite the fact that I had this chronic tiredness and fatigue,” she was quoted as saying.
“When you’re doing live news, you have this rush of adrenaline, and you just have to get on with it.”
Moshiri, who is a mother of three children aged 13, 11 and 9, also highlighted how she has struggled with constant fatigue while managing family life.
Polycythemia vera is a disorder in which the bone marrow produces excessive amounts of blood cells. In PV, the major problem is an overproduction of red blood cells.
An increased number of red blood cells means a higher proportion of cells are circulating in the blood. This can make the blood thicker and increase the risk of blood clots, stroke and heart attack.
Doctors therefore pay close attention to a patient's hematocrit, which represents the proportion of blood made up of red blood cells.
One of the major treatment goals is to keep hematocrit below 45%, which helps reduce cardiovascular risks.
One of the traditional ways of controlling PV is removing some blood. The procedure, called phlebotomy, involves taking blood from a vein to reduce the number of circulating red blood cells and bring the hematocrit level down.
For some patients, this can become a recurring procedure. They may need repeated blood draws even while receiving standard treatment. This treatment burden is one reason a new drug for PV has attracted attention.
Late last month, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Mimrylo (rusfertide) for adults with polycythemia vera (PV).
The drug is the first approved treatment for PV that mimics hepcidin, a naturally occurring hormone that regulates iron in the body.
The approval is particularly significant for patients whose disease remains inadequately controlled despite existing treatment and who need frequent blood-removal procedures.
“People living with polycythemia vera have long faced the challenge of managing a chronic blood disorder with frequent blood draws,” said Tanya Wroblewski, Director of the Division of Nonmalignant Hematology at the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
The FDA granted priority review and approved the drug to Takeda Pharmaceuticals America.
Credit: AI
Air pollution has now become an inevitable aspect in many Indian cities, whether it is vehicular emissions, dust from construction activities, industrial pollutants, or smoke from burning crops. Some of the worst pollutants from the health point of view are those comprising PM2.5 (particulate matter 2.5).
Particulate matter 2.5 means the fine particulate matter measuring 2.5 microns in diameter or smaller, which is roughly 30 times smaller than the diameter of a human hair.
Due to their microscopic size, these particles can enter deep inside the lungs and even the blood stream. The WHO and the IARC have labeled outdoor air pollution and particulate matter as a carcinogen, which implies that it can lead to increased risk of cancer.
Long-term exposure to PM2.5 is responsible for causing inflammation and oxidative stress within the body. Inflammation and oxidative stress will eventually result in DNA damage leading to an abnormal growth of cells.
The link between exposure to PM2.5 and cancer is well-documented, with lung cancer being the most established one, while others are still under investigation. According to WHO guidelines, long-term exposure to PM2.5 is linked to higher lung cancer mortality rates, even at lower concentrations.
This is highly relevant to India because air pollution in many Indian cities exceeds WHO recommendations.
Also read: Exposure To Air Pollution May Harm Male And Female Fertility, Expert Reveals
Even though individual measures may not solve the problem of air pollution completely, they do help to minimize personal exposure.
Monitor the AQI index before engaging in any outdoor physical activity and on polluted days, try to reduce the amount of time you spend outdoors.
Early morning and late evening are typically times when pollution level is high. Plan your outdoor activities on less polluted days.
When going out, especially commuting, during the days of high pollution use an N95 mask that helps to filter fine particles.
Close windows during heavy air pollution and install a HEPA filter air purifier if needed, especially for kids, elderly people and those who suffer from lungs diseases.
Do not smoke indoors; use less incense and mosquito coil indoors, and make sure there is a good ventilation system in the kitchen when you cook.
Never smoke, keep physically active during the days of decent air quality, and eat nutritious food with lots of fruit and veggies.
Protecting yourself from the health risks of PM2.5 can be done by both individual means and also collective efforts. More sustainable modes of transport, better emission control policies, improved waste disposal facilities, and sound urban planning practices will become necessary eventually. In the meantime, we only have our knowledge and preventive steps to safeguard our health.
By Dr. Reshma Puranik, Cancer Physician, MOC Pune
Credit: AI
Robotic thyroid surgery is a minimally invasive technique in which the surgeon uses robotic instruments to remove part or all of the thyroid gland. Unlike conventional surgery, which requires an incision on the front of the neck, the robotic approach uses small incisions hidden in the armpit and chest to access the thyroid, thereby avoiding a visible neck scar while maintaining surgical precision.
However, one of the biggest misconceptions about robotic surgery is that the robot performs the operation independently. It does not. Every movement is completely controlled by the surgeon, who sits at a console and guides the robotic instruments with exceptional precision. The technology essentially extends the surgeon's capabilities by providing a high-definition, three-dimensional and magnified view of the surgical field, along with highly flexible, wristed instruments.
The absence of a visible neck scar is undoubtedly a major advantage, especially for patients concerned about their appearance. However, robotic thyroid surgery is far more than a cosmetic procedure.
The robotic system provides high-definition, magnified 3D vision and wristed instruments that allow meticulous dissection around delicate structures such as the recurrent laryngeal nerves and parathyroid glands. This precision helps preserve these vital structures, minimizing the risk of nerve injury, voice changes, and parathyroid dysfunction. Tremor filtration and enhanced dexterity further improve surgical accuracy.
Together, these advantages result in less tissue trauma, reduced postoperative pain, faster recovery, and excellent functional and cosmetic outcomes.
Also read: Why Your Thyroid Test Results Can Vary Between Labs?
Not every thyroid patient is a candidate for robotic surgery. Patients with thyroid nodules, selected early thyroid cancers and certain benign thyroid enlargements may be considered after detailed evaluation.
So, patients with very large goitres, advanced thyroid cancers involving surrounding structures or certain complex medical conditions may be better suited to conventional open surgery.
Therefore, patient selection remains one of the most important aspects of robotic thyroid surgery.
There is a common belief that robotic thyroid surgery is meant only for young patients who want to avoid a neck scar. Is that true?
No. While the absence of a visible neck scar is certainly an attractive cosmetic benefit, it is not the main advantage of robotic thyroid surgery. The real strength of robotic technology lies in its precision, which minimizes tissue trauma, reduces postoperative pain, and promotes faster recovery.
Most patients require pain medication for only 48–72 hours after surgery. These benefits are particularly valuable for elderly patients, who often recover more comfortably and can avoid prolonged use of painkillers. Therefore, age is not a criterion for robotic thyroid surgery. Suitability depends on the nature of the thyroid disease and careful patient selection.
One of the major concerns after thyroid surgery is voice alteration, as the recurrent laryngeal nerve, which controls the vocal cords, lies in close proximity to the thyroid gland. The magnified 3D view and wristed robotic instruments enable meticulous identification and preservation of this delicate nerve during surgery.
Although no surgical technique can completely eliminate the risk of complications, the enhanced precision and superior visualization offered by robotic surgery help minimize the risk of nerve injury while ensuring careful preservation of other vital structures.
Recovery after robotic thyroid surgery varies from patient to patient. Most patients are able to walk within a few hours after surgery and are discharged within one to two days. In our experience, pain is usually mild, with most patients requiring pain medication for only 48–72 hours.
As there is no incision on the front of the neck, swallowing and neck movements are often more comfortable during recovery. Reduced postoperative discomfort can be particularly beneficial for elderly patients, in whom prolonged use of pain medication may be undesirable.
Our Department of Advanced Robotic Surgery has emerged as one of the highest-volume centres for robotic thyroid surgery in Eastern India, currently performing approximately 3–4 robotic thyroid procedures every month. As awareness among patients and referring physicians continues to grow, this number is steadily increasing.
Our experience has been highly encouraging, with no permanent voice changes or major complications reported among our robotic thyroid surgery patients to date. These results reinforce an important message: while robotic technology is a powerful tool, its success ultimately depends on careful patient selection and the experience of the surgical team.
Thyroid surgery need not be a cause for fear. Modern surgical techniques have made treatment safer, more precise, and increasingly patient-friendly. For appropriately selected patients, robotic thyroid surgery offers the advantages of exceptional surgical precision, reduced tissue trauma, faster and more comfortable recovery, and the significant cosmetic benefit of avoiding a visible neck scar.
By Dr. S. K. Bala, Surgical Oncologist and Robotic Surgeon, CK Birla Hospitals, CMRI
© $2026 Times Horizon Private Limited