When was the last time you measured your waistline? If you assume that BMI is the only number to focus on when it comes to your health, think twice. New research has revealed a shocking revelation—your waist circumference might be a far better predictor of men's cancer risk than BMI.

The study finds that for each 4-inch increase in waist size, a man's risk of cancer increases by a staggering 25%. Meanwhile, BMI, commonly regarded as the gold standard for assessing obesity, raises cancer risk by only 19% for the same weight gain. So, if you've been dismissing that pesky belly fat, it's time to take notice.

But why is your waistline so important? The reason is visceral fat—the hidden, deep fat that accumulates around your organs. Unlike other body fat, visceral fat is a stealthy troublemaker, causing inflammation, insulin resistance, and abnormal blood fat levels—all of which combine to create a cancer-perfect storm.

Obesity has been associated with an increased risk of numerous health conditions, including cancer, for decades. The research, though, indicates that a specific measure of the body—waist circumference—may be an even more reliable forecaster of cancer risk in men than the more frequently employed Body Mass Index (BMI). This finding emphasizes the need to pay particular attention to the distribution of fat and not merely to the weight of the body.

BMI has been the go-to measure for years for gauging health risks related to obesity. New research, though, that appears in The Journal of the National Cancer Institute indicates that waist measurement is a better predictor of cancer risk in men. According to the research, four more inches (10 cm) around the waist will add 25% to a man's cancer risk. Conversely, a 3.7 kg/m² rise in BMI (from a BMI of 24 to 27.7) increased cancer risk by only 19%.

Why is waist circumference a better predictor, then? Unlike BMI, which measures weight relative to height, waist circumference actually measures abdominal fat—specifically, visceral fat. This type of fat encircles internal organs and is also linked to higher levels of inflammation, insulin resistance, and abnormal blood lipids, all of which are factors in cancer growth. BMI, however, does not measure fat distribution, so two individuals with the same BMI can have very different levels of health risk depending on where fat is deposited on their bodies.

Why Men Are at Higher Risk?

Interestingly, the research identified a significant difference between men and women when it came to waist circumference and cancer risk. Although waist circumference and BMI were linked with obesity-related cancers in women, the relationship was weaker than for men. An increase of 12 cm (4.7 inches) in waist size or a 4.3 rise in BMI (from 24 to 28.3) raised the cancer risk in women by just 13%—a much lower percentage than for men.

Experts credit this difference to the way that fat is stored in the body. Men are more likely to carry fat around the abdomen, especially as visceral fat, which is more metabolically active and associated with cancer-producing biological alterations. Women, by contrast, store fat in peripheral sites such as the hips and thighs, where it is less likely to drive systemic inflammation and metabolic disturbances.

A possible reason is that men tend to depot fat more in the visceral regions, whereas women tend to carry more subcutaneous and peripheral fat," wrote the researchers. "This may render waist circumference a more robust risk factor for cancer in men and account for why waist circumference provides additional risk information beyond BMI in men but not women."

Cancer Types Most Linked to Abdominal Fat

The research used the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) data to define obesity-related cancers. These cancers are esophageal (adenocarcinoma), gastric (cardia), colorectal, rectal, liver, gallbladder, pancreatic, renal, and thyroid cancers, and multiple myeloma and meningioma. In men, abdominal obesity is especially significant in raising the risk of these cancers through high levels of insulin and markers of inflammation.

For women, the research proposes that both waist circumference and hip circumference may give a more accurate estimate of visceral fat and cancer risk. "Adding hip circumference to risk models could strengthen the link between waist circumference and cancer, especially in women," researchers observed.

What This Means for Men's Health and Cancer Prevention?

With these results, doctors advise men to be more mindful of their waistline than only their BMI. Waist size is an easy method to gauge health risk, and its maintenance through lifestyle changes might be the key to cancer prevention.

How To Reduce Cancer Risk In Men?

Track Your Waist Size: Regularly measure your waist circumference and try to keep it in a healthy range (below 40 inches for men, according to medical advice).

Eat a Balanced Diet: A diet containing high fiber, lean protein, and healthy fats can assist in limiting visceral fat gain.

Exercise Consistently: Regular exercise with a combination of aerobic and strength training will help maintain a healthy waistline.

Control Stress and Sleep: Persistent stress and inadequate sleep tend to cause weight gain, especially in the midsection of the body.

Regular Health Screenings: Early identification of cancer risk factors through regular screening can greatly enhance long-term health status.

Climate change caused a 10 per cent global increase in Salmonella antibiotic resistance genes between 1940 and 2023, according to the first-of-its-kind study published in The Lancet Planetary Health journal today.

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is mainly driven by the overuse and misuse of antibiotics, which allows resistant bacteria to survive and spread.

However, rising temperatures and changing rainfall patterns can influence how bacteria survive, mutate, and spread, potentially increasing the exchange of antibiotic resistance genes.

“The accumulated evidence suggests that climate change is an accelerating force behind the global spread of antimicrobial resistance,” the study authors wrote in the paper.

What Are The Findings?

The study provides supporting evidence that AMR doesn’t just increase steadily as temperatures rise, but that the number of resistance genes changes over time in a more complicated way, depending on both temperature and rainfall. This suggests that environmental changes can speed up how bacteria adapt to antibiotics.

“These findings reinforce the idea that climate change alters microbial ecological stability and accelerates resistance evolution across human, animal, and environmental reservoirs," said the global researchers.

How Was The Study Conducted?

The current study analyzed the genomes of more than 480,000 Salmonella samples from 139 countries, collected between 1940 and 2023, and compared levels of antibiotic resistance genes with changes in average temperature and rainfall over time.

Of the total, 82 per cent of countries saw increases in antibiotic resistance genes in Salmonella, with the strongest climate-associated increases occurring in the Middle East and North Africa, followed by South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa.

While the study shows a link between climate change and antibiotic resistance genes in Salmonella, it does not prove that climate change directly causes the increase.

The study also used a model to predict the change in antibiotic resistance genes in Salmonella by 2100 under different climate emissions scenarios.

The model suggests that if countries meet low-emission climate targets and strengthen efforts to use antibiotics responsibly, levels of resistance genes could be 24% lower than under the highest-emission scenario. However, they caution that these projections, as with all models, involve uncertainty.

The researchers stressed the need to consider climate change when monitoring and addressing AMR. They add that stronger climate action, alongside responsible antibiotic use and improved disease surveillance across humans, animals, and the environment, will be important in limiting the future spread of AMR.

What Is Salmonella?

As per the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Salmonella is a group of bacteria that can cause gastrointestinal illness and fever called salmonellosis. It can be spread by food handlers who do not wash their hands and/or the surfaces and tools they use between food preparation steps. It can also happen when people consume uncooked and raw food. Salmonella can also spread from animals to people.

Common symptoms of Salmonella include

• diarrhea,
• fever,
• stomach cramps 6 hours to 6 days after being exposed to the bacteria.

Children younger than 5, adults 65 and older, and people with weakened immune systems are more likely to have severe illness.

Indian summers are not just uncomfortable; they are becoming increasingly dangerous. With temperatures frequently crossing 45–48°C, heatwaves are putting excess stress on the human body, which hitherto had not experienced this level of heat strain. Now, add smoking to this already hostile environment and, like adding fuel to a fire, two harmful components combine to multiply the damage. Dr Shubham Garg, Director of Surgical Oncology, Dharamshila Narayana Superspeciality Hospital, Delhi, spoke about the risks of stepping out to grab a smoke during extreme heatwaves.

Smoking during heatwaves doesn’t just worsen existing risks; it accelerates dehydration, strains the heart, damages the lungs, and pushes the body closer to heat exhaustion or heatstroke. Here’s why lighting up in extreme heat is far more dangerous than most people realise.

Heatwaves Already Stress the Body—Smoking Adds Fuel to the Fire

When temperatures soar, your body works overtime to cool itself. A host of processes happen to aid in this—your blood vessels dilate, there could be an increase in heart rate, and sweating intensifies in order to regulate body temperature. When you smoke, it interferes with these very natural defense mechanisms of your body.

Nicotine results in vasoconstriction—narrowing of blood vessels—which makes it very difficult for the body to release heat trapped inside. The carbon monoxide from cigarettes reduces oxygen delivery to tissues. The result? Less oxygen reaches your organs, which are, in fact, working harder in the extreme heat. This is a perilous combination that can affect the body in many ways.

Dehydration Happens Faster Than You Think

A heatwave leads to sweating and, consequently, loss of fluids and electrolytes. And when you go for smoking a cigarette, it leads to fluid loss and delayed hydration. Nicotine acts as a mild diuretic, which contributes to increased fluid loss. Smoking also suppresses thirst signals, thus delaying hydration.

Collectively these factors raise the risk of severe dehydration, which can trigger dizziness, muscle cramps, low blood pressure, and confusion—all of which are early signs of heat exhaustion. Many smokers ignore these signs or dismiss them altogether.

A Deadly Mix for the Heart

Cardiovascular strain can happen independently through either smoking or heat. That in itself is a threat one should keep an eye out for. However, when combined, they pose a compelling risk of:

1. Sudden spikes or drops in blood pressure
2. Irregular heart rhythms
3. Heat-induced cardiac events

During extremely hot weather conditions, especially during a heatwave, the heart has to exert more effort to maintain circulation and cooling in the body. Smoking elevates heart rate and blood pressure further while also thickening the blood and increasing the risk of heart attacks and strokes, especially in people with pre-existing diabetes, hypertension, or heart disease.

Lungs Struggle More in Hot, Polluted Air

Hot weather is bad for air pollution levels too, as it traps smoke, dust, and harmful gases close to the ground. When one smokes in these conditions, it severely compromises lung function:

1. Airways become inflamed and constricted
2. Oxygen exchange efficiency drops
3. Symptoms like breathlessness, coughing, and chest tightness worsen

For people with asthma, COPD, or other respiratory conditions, smoking during a heatwave is likely to trigger severe flare-ups and emergency hospital visits.

Heat + Smoking Accelerates Ageing and Skin Damage

Extreme heat is damaging not just for the heart but for the skin as well. The skin becomes dehydrated, and collagen breaks down. Smoking compounds this damage by reducing blood flow and oxygen supply to the skin.

The result:

1. Faster wrinkles and sagging skin
2. Increased pigmentation and dullness
3. Delayed healing of rashes, infections, and sun damage

In short, smoking during summer doesn’t just harm internal organs; it visibly accelerates the ageing process.

Higher Risk of Heat Exhaustion and Heatstroke

Smoking reduces the body’s ability to regulate temperature effectively. This makes smokers more vulnerable to heat exhaustion (fatigue, nausea, headache, dizziness) and heatstroke (confusion, collapse, organ failure).

Heatstroke is a medical emergency and can be fatal if not treated promptly. Smokers often misread early warning signs as ‘normal summer weakness,' thus delaying care.

Why Cutting Down Isn’t Enough

Many smokers try to “reduce” smoking during summer. While any reduction helps, heatwaves are one of the worst times to smoke at all. Even a few cigarettes can significantly increase physiological stress when temperatures are extreme.

Smoking during heatwaves is not just bad—it’s dangerously synergistic. If there ever is a time to quit, or at least pause, this should be it. Because in peak summer, smoking doesn’t just harm you slowly. It fast-tracks damage, turning heat into a silent but serious health threat. In extreme heat, choosing not to smoke isn’t just a lifestyle choice—it’s a life-saving one.

When the heart stops functioning, time doesn’t stop with it. In cases of cardiac arrest, time serves as one of the most decisive factors between survival and irreversible loss. Within a couple of seconds, the body starts losing its oxygen supply. In a few minutes, the brain starts to suffer damage. And with each passing minute without intervention, the chances of survival reduce significantly.

This severe reality is at the centre of what Dr Ankit Desai, Paediatric Anaesthetist and Founder & Director of Children’s Anaesthesia Services, explains as “a race against biological shutdown — one where the bystander is the only lifeline”.

The silent collapse: what happens in cardiac arrest

Several people have the misconception that cardiac arrest is similar to a heart attack, but they are very different. A heart attack is a circulatory issue where the heart might still be beating. However, in cases of cardiac arrest, there is an electrical failure, and the heart suddenly stops pumping blood effectively.

Whenever this occurs, blood flow to the brain and other vital organs ceases immediately. The oxygen reserves in the brain are extremely limited and typically last for about 4 to 6 minutes before any permanent injury occurs.

This is where the concept of time sensitivity becomes more important. For every passing minute without CPR or defibrillation, the chances of survival drop by approximately 7–10%. By the time 10 minutes have elapsed without intervention, survival is extremely unlikely in most cases.

“The tragedy is not just the cardiac arrest itself,” explains Dr Desai, “but the silence that follows — when no one knows what to do or hesitates too long to act.”

The brain’s narrow window of survival

The brain is the first organ to be affected during cardiac arrest. Neurons are highly sensitive to oxygen deprivation. Brain cells start to malfunction within 3 minutes. By 5 minutes, the damage starts becoming increasingly severe. Beyond 10 minutes, the chances of meaningful recovery drastically reduce. This is why immediate CPR is not just a supportive measure but a bridge that keeps oxygen flowing artificially until a normal rhythm can be restored.

Chest compressions manually pump blood to the brain and heart, delaying cell death.

Why bystander action matters more than ambulance time

Emergency medical services, even in well-equipped systems, often take several minutes to reach a patient. In urban areas, response times may be shorter, but they are rarely instantaneous. In cardiac arrest, those minutes matter more than any hospital intervention.

Dr Desai emphasises that “the first responder is almost always not a doctor — it is a family member, a colleague, or a nearby stranger”.

This makes bystander CPR the most critical determinant of survival. Studies consistently show that when CPR is initiated immediately, survival rates can double or even triple compared to cases where no bystander action is taken.

Yet fear, hesitation, and lack of training remain major barriers. Many people worry about performing CPR incorrectly, causing harm, or being held legally responsible. In reality, doing nothing is far more dangerous than taking imperfect action.

The Chain of Survival: breaking down the timeline

Medical professionals often refer to this situation as the “Chain of Survival”, which includes early detection of cardiac arrest, immediate CPR, rapid defibrillation (AED use), advanced medical care, and post-resuscitation support. Every link in this chain is highly time-sensitive. Any delay in one step weakens the entire outcome. The strongest determinant, however, remains the second step — early CPR.

Automated External Defibrillators (AEDs), if available, can help restore a normal heart rhythm if used quickly. But again, their effectiveness decreases sharply with delay. The combination of CPR and early defibrillation within the first few minutes offers the best chance of survival.

Why awareness changes everything

The key difference between life and death is less about complexity and more about readiness.

Awareness training helps transform bystanders into responders. A person who knows how to identify cardiac arrest — unresponsiveness, absence of breathing, sudden collapse — is far more likely to act immediately rather than wait.

Dr Desai highlights a critical cultural gap: “We often associate medical emergencies with hospitals. But cardiac arrest begins in living rooms, offices, gyms, and streets. The response must begin there, too.”

Basic CPR training takes less than an hour to learn, but can influence outcomes for decades. Schools, workplaces, and community programmes play a vital role in normalising this skill.

Overcoming hesitation: the psychological barrier

One aspect of cardiac arrest that often gets overlooked is human hesitation. Bystanders often freeze due to shock and uncertainty. Some assume that someone else will step in. Others underestimate the severity of the situation.

Public awareness campaigns help highlight the simplicity of CPR, which helps overcome this barrier. Hands-only CPR focuses on continuous chest compressions without mouth-to-mouth breathing, making intervention much easier and more accessible. The message is simple: push hard, push fast, and don’t stop until help arrives.

A shift from reaction to preparedness

Cardiac arrest survival is not just a medical issue, but also one of public preparedness. The Chain of Survival starts long before the emergency happens. It starts with education, confidence, and awareness.

Dr Desai states that “if more people understood how little time they truly have, more lives would be saved not by hospitals, but by ordinary people doing extraordinary things in the first five minutes”.

Conclusion: time is the real patient

In cardiac arrest, the patient is not just the person who collapses — it is time itself. Every second lost reduces the chance of recovery. Every trained bystander becomes a potential lifesaver. The science is clear, the timeline is unforgiving, and the solution is remarkably simple: act immediately, compress the chest, and keep blood flowing until professional help arrives.