When was the last time you measured your waistline? If you assume that BMI is the only number to focus on when it comes to your health, think twice. New research has revealed a shocking revelation—your waist circumference might be a far better predictor of men's cancer risk than BMI.

The study finds that for each 4-inch increase in waist size, a man's risk of cancer increases by a staggering 25%. Meanwhile, BMI, commonly regarded as the gold standard for assessing obesity, raises cancer risk by only 19% for the same weight gain. So, if you've been dismissing that pesky belly fat, it's time to take notice.

But why is your waistline so important? The reason is visceral fat—the hidden, deep fat that accumulates around your organs. Unlike other body fat, visceral fat is a stealthy troublemaker, causing inflammation, insulin resistance, and abnormal blood fat levels—all of which combine to create a cancer-perfect storm.

Obesity has been associated with an increased risk of numerous health conditions, including cancer, for decades. The research, though, indicates that a specific measure of the body—waist circumference—may be an even more reliable forecaster of cancer risk in men than the more frequently employed Body Mass Index (BMI). This finding emphasizes the need to pay particular attention to the distribution of fat and not merely to the weight of the body.

BMI has been the go-to measure for years for gauging health risks related to obesity. New research, though, that appears in The Journal of the National Cancer Institute indicates that waist measurement is a better predictor of cancer risk in men. According to the research, four more inches (10 cm) around the waist will add 25% to a man's cancer risk. Conversely, a 3.7 kg/m² rise in BMI (from a BMI of 24 to 27.7) increased cancer risk by only 19%.

Why is waist circumference a better predictor, then? Unlike BMI, which measures weight relative to height, waist circumference actually measures abdominal fat—specifically, visceral fat. This type of fat encircles internal organs and is also linked to higher levels of inflammation, insulin resistance, and abnormal blood lipids, all of which are factors in cancer growth. BMI, however, does not measure fat distribution, so two individuals with the same BMI can have very different levels of health risk depending on where fat is deposited on their bodies.

Why Men Are at Higher Risk?

Interestingly, the research identified a significant difference between men and women when it came to waist circumference and cancer risk. Although waist circumference and BMI were linked with obesity-related cancers in women, the relationship was weaker than for men. An increase of 12 cm (4.7 inches) in waist size or a 4.3 rise in BMI (from 24 to 28.3) raised the cancer risk in women by just 13%—a much lower percentage than for men.

Experts credit this difference to the way that fat is stored in the body. Men are more likely to carry fat around the abdomen, especially as visceral fat, which is more metabolically active and associated with cancer-producing biological alterations. Women, by contrast, store fat in peripheral sites such as the hips and thighs, where it is less likely to drive systemic inflammation and metabolic disturbances.

A possible reason is that men tend to depot fat more in the visceral regions, whereas women tend to carry more subcutaneous and peripheral fat," wrote the researchers. "This may render waist circumference a more robust risk factor for cancer in men and account for why waist circumference provides additional risk information beyond BMI in men but not women."

Cancer Types Most Linked to Abdominal Fat

The research used the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) data to define obesity-related cancers. These cancers are esophageal (adenocarcinoma), gastric (cardia), colorectal, rectal, liver, gallbladder, pancreatic, renal, and thyroid cancers, and multiple myeloma and meningioma. In men, abdominal obesity is especially significant in raising the risk of these cancers through high levels of insulin and markers of inflammation.

For women, the research proposes that both waist circumference and hip circumference may give a more accurate estimate of visceral fat and cancer risk. "Adding hip circumference to risk models could strengthen the link between waist circumference and cancer, especially in women," researchers observed.

What This Means for Men's Health and Cancer Prevention?

With these results, doctors advise men to be more mindful of their waistline than only their BMI. Waist size is an easy method to gauge health risk, and its maintenance through lifestyle changes might be the key to cancer prevention.

How To Reduce Cancer Risk In Men?

Track Your Waist Size: Regularly measure your waist circumference and try to keep it in a healthy range (below 40 inches for men, according to medical advice).

Eat a Balanced Diet: A diet containing high fiber, lean protein, and healthy fats can assist in limiting visceral fat gain.

Exercise Consistently: Regular exercise with a combination of aerobic and strength training will help maintain a healthy waistline.

Control Stress and Sleep: Persistent stress and inadequate sleep tend to cause weight gain, especially in the midsection of the body.

Regular Health Screenings: Early identification of cancer risk factors through regular screening can greatly enhance long-term health status.

India faces a substantial hepatitis C burden, with the World Health Organization (WHO) estimating that 5.5 million to 12 million people are living with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.

Untreated chronic HCV infection can lead to liver scarring, cirrhosis and liver cancer. Could shortening treatment by four weeks help more patients access a cure?

A multi-center trial led by researchers from the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) found that an eight-week course of a commonly used antiviral combination was as effective as the standard 12-week regimen in patients without cirrhosis. Published in The Lancet, the findings could have implications for treatment costs and access to care.

The treatment combines sofosbuvir (400 mg) and velpatasvir (100 mg), two direct-acting antivirals that target the hepatitis C virus.

What Did The Indian Trial Find?

Also read: Punjab To Start Screening For HIV, Hepatitis B & C At De-Addiction Centres

The RESOLVE trial, led by researchers from Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Lucknow, evaluated whether eight weeks of sofosbuvir and velpatasvir could match the effectiveness of the standard 12-week course.

The trial enrolled 880 patients without cirrhosis across five publicly funded hospitals in Lucknow, New Delhi and Varanasi. Half received the combination for eight weeks, while the other half received it for 12 weeks.

Among participants who completed treatment and follow-up, 98.8% in the eight-week group achieved a sustained virological response, compared with 99% in the 12-week group. This means the virus remained undetectable after treatment, indicating a cure.

The researchers found that the shorter regimen was non-inferior to the standard course, meaning it was not less effective beyond the trial's prespecified statistical margin.

The study also reported no drug-related serious adverse events or treatment discontinuations due to adverse events.

How Shorter Treatment Help Reduce Hepatitis C Burden In India?

Direct-acting antivirals transformed hepatitis C treatment nearly a decade ago, making it possible to cure most patients with relatively few side effects. However, treatment costs and access remain important considerations for large public health programmes.

A 12-week course of sofosbuvir and velpatasvir costs approximately ₹15,000. Shortening treatment by four weeks could save around ₹5,000 per patient.

If adopted for a population of 60 lakh people requiring treatment, the shorter regimen could potentially save ₹3,000 crore. However, these are projected savings, and the actual impact would depend on patient eligibility, treatment costs and adoption in clinical practice.

Who Can Receive The Shorter Treatment?

The findings apply to patients without cirrhosis, as the trial excluded those with the condition. Patients with cirrhosis may require different treatment approaches depending on the severity of their liver disease and other clinical factors.

The trial's results do not mean that everyone with hepatitis C can switch to an eight-week course. Further evaluation and changes to relevant clinical guidance may be needed before the shorter regimen becomes routine practice.

Patients should consult their treating physician before making any changes to their prescribed treatment.

How Does Hepatitis C Spread?

Hepatitis C can cause illness ranging from mild infection to serious, long-term liver disease. Although some acute infections resolve spontaneously, chronic infection can progress to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, a type of liver cancer.

The virus can spread through infected blood, including via shared needles and unscreened blood transfusions.

Perinatal transmission is an important route of HCV acquisition in children. Early detection can help identify infected infants and ensure appropriate follow-up.

Colorectal cancer (CRC), a term encompassing cancer of the colon and rectum, is not only a growing burden in India, but a significant proportion of patients are now being diagnosed at a young age. While colorectal cancer is more common in older adults, Indian clinical studies have identified the phenomenon of young onset colorectal cancer (YO-CRC), typically diagnosed before the age of 50. An experts’ review on epidemiology of colorectal cancer with special emphasis on India, an article in 2025 was published in the Indian Journal of Gastroenterology. The review found that there has been an annual rise of 2-3% in the incidence of colorectal cancer over the past two decades.

In the area of Young Onset Colorectal Cancer, an editorial in 2024 in the South Asian Journal of Cancer noted that one quarter to one-third of colorectal cancer patients in India were below 40 years, and many were diagnosed at stage III or IV. Titled Clinicopathologic Profile and Treatment Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer in Young Adults, A Multicenter Study from India, an article published in JCO Global Oncology studied colorectal cancer among adolescents and young adults. The study revealed 62.70% had colon cancer and 37.30% rectal cancer, with 67% being aged 30-39 years and no significant gender predisposition, though females had a higher metastatic burden.

Why is colorectal cancer affecting younger Indians?

There is no single explanation. Researchers have studied factors like dietary changes, obesity, physical inactivity, altered metabolism, alcohol consumption, smoking, and environment as possible contributors. Increasing urbanisation and changing food habits could also be playing a role in India’s shifting colorectal cancer profile. But not all patients present with conventional risk factors, and in many patients, the causes remain unclear.

Genetic predispositions need special mention. Conditions such as Lynch syndrome and familial adenomatous polyposis (an inherited genetic condition that causes precancerous polyps to form in the large intestine) can raise the risk of colorectal cancer at a young age, but most young-onset cases are not explained by an inherited cancer syndrome.

Also read: Pope Leo XIV, Diagnosed With Lung Cancer, Undergoes Surgery As His Brother Battles Relapsed Multiple Myeloma

The problem of missed symptoms

One of the biggest problems in cancer treatment is delayed diagnosis. Because cancer is associated with older age, the symptoms in younger people may be mistaken for piles, constipation, diet-related problems or even irritable bowel syndrome. Rectal bleeding, persistent changes in bowel habits, unexplained weight loss, abdominal pain, iron-deficiency anaemia, persistent fatigue, or a feeling of incomplete bowel evacuation is usually dismissed as minor issues in younger people.

What should young Indians do?

Colonoscopy is not a solution that can be recommended for every young adult. Symptoms- and risk-based screening is a more reasonable approach. People with persistent symptoms, a strong family history of colorectal cancer, hereditary cancer syndromes, inflammatory bowel disease, or unexplained anaemia may require more intensive evaluation (including colonoscopy) if clinically indicated. This are high risk group, and they need regular screening lifelong. India’s colorectal cancer burden is rising, and younger patients are important segment of this burden.

The evidence available does not prove a nationwide explosion of colorectal cancer in under-50 age groups in India, but it does demonstrate an increasing overall incidence, a significant presence of young onset colorectal cancer, and frequent late presentation. If someone have a first degree relative with colon or rectal cancer like parents, ideally, they should have a colonoscopy done by the age of 45. For younger Indians, early recognition of warning signs may be one of the most critical steps for timely diagnosis and improved outcomes.

By Dr. Abhishek Gangopadhyay, Consultant - Surgical Gastroenterology, Surgical Oncology, Narayana RN Tagore Hospital, Mukundapur, Kolkata

At 42, Danielle Ripley-Burgess of Kansas City, Missouri, has survived colon cancer three times, at 17, 25 and 39.

The disease often begins as noncancerous growths called polyps in the colon or rectum. Early-stage cancer and precancerous polyps may cause no noticeable symptoms. Ripley-Burgess spotted her first symptom at the age of 14 but ignored.

Her First Symptom At 14

At 14, Ripley-Burgess noticed specks of blood in her stool but hid them out of embarrassment, believing red foods might be responsible.

“I thought, I’m eating something red and that’s probably what I see,” she told Today. “So I put myself on a ‘no red foods diet’ and stopped eating anything that was red in color: everything from candy to pizza to salsa to raspberry popsicles.”

After two years she eventually told her mother, who believed it to be a case of hemorrhoids. As her bleeding worsened, and she developed fatigue and severe stomach pain, she was taken to a gastroenterologist.

Colon Cancer Diagnosis At Age 17 And 25

A few weeks after her 17th birthday, Ripley-Burgess was diagnosed with stage 3 colon cancer. She underwent chemotherapy, radiation and surgery. But years later, a follow-up colonoscopy revealed another cancerous polyp.

“I thought I had beaten cancer. I was getting colonoscopies every three years, and after one of them, I woke up and saw the very same look on the doctor’s face that I had seen eight years prior,” she said. “He saw a polyp that later turned out to be cancerous. I had no symptoms. At 25, I had stage 1 colon cancer.”

The second diagnosis was emotionally difficult as she feared losing the life she had built with her husband and the future they had planned.

Lynch Syndrome Increased Her Cancer Risk

Further testing revealed that Ripley-Burgess had Lynch syndrome, an inherited condition that increases the risk of colorectal, uterine and other cancers, according to the Mayo Clinic.

She underwent a preventive hysterectomy and subtotal colectomy, which removed all but about 13 inches of her colon.

Despite these measures, a colonoscopy in 2023 yet again detected a recurrence. At 39, she opted to have the remaining colon removed and a permanent ileostomy.

“I wasn’t expecting it, but I also wasn’t completely shocked,” she said, explaining that living with Lynch syndrome meant knowing cancer could return.

Why Blood in Stool Should Not Be Ignored

Ripley-Burgess now shares her story to encourage people, especially younger adults, to seek medical attention for unusual symptoms.

“If I could go back and tell my younger self something, it would be: Don’t be embarrassed about your body,” she told the outlet. “If you’re seeing something with your body that’s uncomfortable and weird, and you’re not ready yet to tell a doctor, tell somebody — a friend or family member. Don’t sit in that place of: something is wrong with your body, and you don’t know what it is. Don’t sit there alone. Don’t downplay what you’re seeing,” she

Colorectal cancer is expected to cause 158,850 new cases and 55,230 deaths in the US in 2026, according to the American Cancer Society.

Dr. Sajjan Rajpurohit, medical oncologist at BLK-Max Super Speciality Hospital, said, “Blood in the stool is one of the most common and concerning signs. While it might be due to hemorrhoids or fissures, it’s important not to assume. A proper evaluation is critical.”

Rectal bleeding can have several causes, but it should not automatically be attributed to hemorrhoids. Timely medical evaluation can help identify the cause and ensure appropriate treatment.