Is US Preparing For A Quademic 2025?

Updated Jan 15, 2025 | 03:10 PM IST

SummaryQuademic 2025: It is all caused by seasonal infections, including common flu, Covid-19, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) that dominate the winter season in the US. This year, norovirus also joined the list, which has further increased the load on the healthcare.
Is US preparing for a quademic?

Credits: Canva

Quademic 2025: Hospitals in the United States are dealing with a surge in patients admission, the reason is the quademic it is dealing with at this moment. This has led to an influx of patients. It is all caused by seasonal infections, including common flu, Covid-19, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) that dominate the winter season in the US. This year, norovirus also joined the list, which has further increased the load on the healthcare.

The healthcare company founded in academics M Health Fairview, confirmed that their hospitals are overflowing due to the quademic.

Is US able to cope with Quademic 2025?

The hospitals of M Health Fairview's volume is up by 30% and as a results, patients are being treated in the hallways and in alternative care areas. There is also a longer wait time and shortages for resources that are required to treat these emergencies. This has also impacted other life-threatening emergencies like heart attacks and strokes, as the healthcare resources and caregivers are occupied with the surge in seasonal cases.

ALSO READ: Birmingham Struggles With 4 Different Virus Hits, Know What They Are

What are these quademic infections?

Common cold and flu: The common cold and influenza (flu) are perhaps the most well-known illnesses that peak during the fall. As temperatures drop and humidity levels fluctuate, viruses that cause colds and the flu become more active. The flu, in particular, can be more severe than a common cold, leading to complications such as pneumonia, especially in vulnerable populations like the elderly and those with pre-existing health conditions. Symptoms include a runny nose, sore throat, coughing, fever, and body aches.

Covid-19: As per the World Health Organization, Coronavirus disease or COVID-19 is an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Most people infected with this virus will experience mild to moderate respiratory illness and recover without requiring special treatment, However, there could be some cases of seriously ill patients who may require medical attention. It is also because of the other existing medical conditions like cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, chronic respiratory diseases, cancers, or older age.

The best way to protect against this virus is by following social isolation form those who are infected, using mask to prevent droplets from infecting others when you cough or sneeze and to wash your hands for 20 seconds frequently.

RSV or Respiratory Syncytial Virus: As per the Centers of Diseases Control and Prevention (CDC), RSV is a common respiratory virus that infects nose, throat and lungs. Though symptoms are similar to the viruses like flu or COVID-19, the disease in itself is different. It also peaks during the winter season, especially between December and January.

However, the main difference between RSV and other respiratory illness, above mentioned is that RSV can cause pneumonia or bronchiolitis, especially for those who are over the age of 50 or with an existing heart or lung disease.

Norovirus: It is a number 1 cause of foodborne illness in the US and this happens when virus gets into the food and then it accidentally enters your mouth. These particles are from faeces or vomit from infected people, or can be transmitted via contaminated food and water. It could also spread by touching unclean surfaces like door handles or cutlery.

For most people, having norovirus is unpleasant, but mild and recovery could be made in 1 to 2 days. However, it could be more serious for babies, older people and anyone with any existing health condition.

End of Article

England Set To Become One Of The First Countries To Eliminate Hepatitis C; Here's How

Updated Aug 12, 2026 | 12:08 PM IST

SummaryEngland is on the way to become one of the first countries to eliminate hepatitis C as a public health emergency.
England Set To Become One Of The First Countries To Eliminate Hepatitis C

Credit: AI

England is on the verge of becoming one of the first countries in the world to eliminate hepatitis C, after more than 100,000 people received the life-saving pioneering antiviral drugs through the NHS that was rolled out in 2015.

NHS England said the country has already surpassed the World Health Organization’s target of treating at least 80% of patients diagnosed with hepatitis C. The latest numbers show that 81.5% of people diagnosed with chronic hepatitis C between 2015 and 2024 had started treatment.

Professor Frankie Swords, NHS national medical director, said hepatitis C can cause serious complications including liver failure and cancer. She also said that many people may live with the infection for years without knowing they have it.

“That’s why the NHS has worked hard alongside public health teams and charities to find and treat hidden cases,” she said, adding that England is now “leading the world” on the path to eliminate the disease.

“We are making significant progress towards eliminating Hepatitis C as a public health threat,” said Dr Sema Mandal, Deputy Director – Blood Safety, Hepatitis, STIs and HIV Division at UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA).

She added, "The sharp fall in cases since 2015 shows the impact of expanded testing and sustained access to modern curative treatments, and the commitment of health services and community partners across England."

“Treating over 100,000 people in just 10 years is a remarkable achievement and brings England closer than ever to becoming one of the first countries in the world to eliminate this disease as a public health threat,” Mandal said.

UK's Public Health Milestone

Also read: How Chronic Hepatitis Quietly Progresses To Liver Cirrhosis: Why Early Action Can Save Your Liver

Hepatitis C is a blood-borne virus that primarily affects the liver. If the infection becomes chronic and remains untreated, it may lead to cirrhosis, liver failure and liver cancer. But hepatitis C differs from many other chronic viral infections as it can be cured.

Since 2015, England has significantly expanded access to direct-acting antiviral medicines. These tablets are generally taken for just 8 to 12 weeks and can clear the virus in more than 90% of the patients.

An estimated 50,200 adults were living with chronic hepatitis C in England in 2024, down 61.1% from an estimated 129,000 in 2015.

Deaths linked to hepatitis C have also fallen, with NHS England reporting a 36% reduction over the past decade.

Testing Still Remains Crucial

The biggest challenge for the health officials right now is finding people who do not know they are infected with hepatitis C.

The UKHSA estimates that 84.6% of people living with chronic hepatitis C had been diagnosed between 2015 and 2024. While the number is is encouraging, it still below the WHO target of 90%.

Past or current injecting drug use remains the most important risk factor in England. People who received blood transfusions or blood products before widespread hepatitis C screening was introduced are also considered at risk.

Elimination does not mean that hepatitis C will disappear completely. Under WHO criteria, it means reducing transmission, illness and deaths to very low levels while maintaining strong testing, treatment and prevention systems in public health.

The progress is especially significant because the world is currently far away from WHO’s 2030 viral hepatitis elimination targets. WHO estimates that about 47 million people were living with hepatitis C globally in 2024, while around 240,000 people died from hepatitis C-related causes.

End of Article

Amid Cyclospora, Salmonella Outbreaks, US FDA Issues Guidance on Ready-to-Eat Produce

Updated Aug 12, 2026 | 09:04 AM IST

Summary​The FDA recommendations are not legally binding and are aimed at manufacturers and processors of products such as chopped lettuce, sliced cantaloupe, diced onions, shredded carrots, coleslaw mixes and fruit salads.
Amid Cyclospora, Salmonella Outbreaks, US FDA Issues Guidance on Ready-to-Eat Produce

Credit: iStock

Even as the US faces major outbreaks of Cyclospora and Salmonella infections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has finalized safety guidance for operations handling ready-to-eat (RTE) fresh-cut produce.

The guidance incorporates public comments received on the October 2018 draft and replaces the FDA’s 2008 guidance on fresh-cut produce.

“This guidance represents the agency’s current thinking on the issues related to preventing contamination in fresh-cut produce,” the FDA said.

The agency also encouraged the industry to continue advancing food safety practices, including through best-practice documents tailored to specific commodities and processes.

The FDA’s guidance targets manufacturers and processors of fresh-cut produce and recommends measures such as sanitation controls, supplier verification and refrigeration amid ongoing outbreaks of cyclosporiasis and salmonella linked to fresh produce.

What Does the FDA Guidance Include?

The FDA recommendations are not legally binding and are aimed at manufacturers and processors of products such as chopped lettuce, sliced cantaloupe, diced onions, shredded carrots, coleslaw mixes and fruit salads.

Fresh-cut produce can include a single commodity, such as cut lettuce, sliced cantaloupe, diced celery, diced onions and shredded carrots, or combinations of two or more produce items, such as coleslaw mixes and fruit salads.

The FDA has focused on contamination with pathogens including salmonella, cyclospora, E. coli and listeria.

Fresh-cut produce processors should assess whether these pathogens pose potential hazards that require preventive measures, including supply-chain controls, the FDA said.

The recommended measures include:

  • Using safe water
  • Washing fruits and vegetables with antimicrobial solutions
  • Training personnel
  • Improving facility design
  • Implementing sanitation controls
  • Verifying suppliers
  • Maintaining appropriate refrigeration
However, cyclospora may require supply-chain controls because antimicrobial treatments used in wash water may not adequately control the parasite, the FDA said. Research into how fresh produce becomes contaminated with cyclospora is ongoing.

Why Is Fresh-Cut Produce at Risk?

Fresh-cut produce can be particularly susceptible to contamination because pathogens may be introduced at multiple points, including during growing, transportation, manufacturing, commingling with other products or at retail.

The opportunity for contamination can increase at each stage before the food reaches consumers.

Fresh-cut produce also does not undergo a kill step to eliminate pathogens that may be introduced during these processes, and most products are sold ready to eat.

The guidance provides recommendations and examples of how Preventive Controls for Human Food can be implemented to protect fresh-cut RTE produce from biological hazards.

Cyclospora and Salmonella Outbreaks

The guidance comes as the US investigates outbreaks linked to contaminated lettuce and jalapenos that have sickened thousands of people.

The cyclospora outbreak linked to iceberg lettuce from Taylor Farms has spread to 15 states, with Michigan hit the hardest.

“Americans should feel confident in eating fresh produce, including leafy greens at this point,” Diamantas said during an appearance on CNBC. The FDA said it remains confident that iceberg lettuce linked to the cyclospora outbreak had been effectively removed from the market following the July 17 recall.

The US Department of Health and Human Services also said Tuesday on X: “Cyclospora: contained, American food: safe.”

However, the FDA and CDC say the investigation into the cyclospora outbreak remains ongoing.

Separately, Taylor Farms said Monday that it was recalling prepared foods containing jalapenos from retailers in several states because of potential salmonella contamination.

End of Article

Stopping Statins After 75 May Not Raise Death Risk In Low-Risk Adults: The Lancet Study

Updated Aug 12, 2026 | 09:00 AM IST

Summary​The new study does not establish that stopping statins is safe for all adults over 75. Longer-term research is needed to determine whether discontinuing treatment could affect cardiovascular risk or mortality beyond three years.
Stopping Statins After 75 May Not Raise Death Risk In Low-Risk Adults: The Lancet Study

Credit: iStock

Statins are widely used to lower “bad” LDL cholesterol and reduce the risk of heart attacks and strokes.

A new study published in The Lancet Healthy Longevity found that stopping statins in adults aged 75 and older with no history of cardiovascular disease did not increase the risk of death over three years compared with continuing treatment.

However, LDL cholesterol rose by around 50% among those who stopped taking the drugs.

Stopping Statins Did Not Increase Death Risk

The study found no significant difference in deaths or major cardiovascular events, including heart attacks and strokes, between older adults who stopped statins and those who continued treatment.

Researchers cautioned that the findings do not mean older adults should routinely stop taking statins.

“The decision to continue or stop statin treatment later in life should be individualized and made through shared decision-making between patients and clinicians,” the researchers said.

Further trials are needed to confirm the findings and assess the long-term effects of stopping statins.

“The benefits of statins increase over time in younger adults and it remains unknown whether stopping the medication could increase the risk of cardiovascular disease and death after the three-year follow-up period in older people,” said the researchers from Bordeaux University Hospital and Université de Bordeaux, France.

What Did the Trial Find?

The randomized controlled trial enrolled 1,160 adults aged 75 and older with no history of heart disease or stroke at general practices in France. Participants were randomly assigned to stop or continue their statin medication.

After three years:

  • 7.2% (35/484) in the statin discontinuation group had died.
  • 7.9% (48/604) in the continuation group had died.
  • There was no significant difference in major cardiovascular events, including heart attacks and strokes.
  • LDL cholesterol rose by 50%, from 115 mg/dL to 171 mg/dL, among those who stopped statins.
  • LDL cholesterol showed no change among those who continued treatment.
  • Physical and mental quality of life remained unchanged in both groups.

What Does This Mean for Patients?

The study involved people taking statins for primary prevention—those at risk of heart disease or stroke but without established cardiovascular disease.

The researchers stressed that the findings should not be interpreted as a recommendation to stop statins.

Instead, the decision should be based on the individual patient’s circumstances and discussed with a clinician.

Why Are Findings Important?

Evidence on the benefits of statins for primary prevention in older adults remains limited because many statin trials exclude people older than 70 or 80.

A 2013 Cochrane meta-analysis of 18 trials found a 14% reduction in deaths from all causes among adults taking statins for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. However, the median age of participants was 57.

The new findings also differ from observational studies from Denmark and Italy published in 2021. Those studies reported about a 30% higher risk of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular outcomes after statins were discontinued in older adults.

Unlike those cohort studies, the new research was a randomized controlled trial, but it only followed participants for three years.

How Statins Work

Statins work by reducing the amount of cholesterol produced by the liver, helping slow the buildup of fatty plaque in the arteries.

They are prescribed both for people at risk of cardiovascular disease (primary prevention) and those with established cardiovascular disease (secondary prevention).

The new study does not establish that stopping statins is safe for all adults over 75. Longer-term research is needed to determine whether discontinuing treatment could affect cardiovascular risk or mortality beyond three years.

End of Article