Credits: Canva
Quademic 2025: Hospitals in the United States are dealing with a surge in patients admission, the reason is the quademic it is dealing with at this moment. This has led to an influx of patients. It is all caused by seasonal infections, including common flu, Covid-19, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) that dominate the winter season in the US. This year, norovirus also joined the list, which has further increased the load on the healthcare.
The healthcare company founded in academics M Health Fairview, confirmed that their hospitals are overflowing due to the quademic.
The hospitals of M Health Fairview's volume is up by 30% and as a results, patients are being treated in the hallways and in alternative care areas. There is also a longer wait time and shortages for resources that are required to treat these emergencies. This has also impacted other life-threatening emergencies like heart attacks and strokes, as the healthcare resources and caregivers are occupied with the surge in seasonal cases.
ALSO READ: Birmingham Struggles With 4 Different Virus Hits, Know What They Are
Common cold and flu: The common cold and influenza (flu) are perhaps the most well-known illnesses that peak during the fall. As temperatures drop and humidity levels fluctuate, viruses that cause colds and the flu become more active. The flu, in particular, can be more severe than a common cold, leading to complications such as pneumonia, especially in vulnerable populations like the elderly and those with pre-existing health conditions. Symptoms include a runny nose, sore throat, coughing, fever, and body aches.
Covid-19: As per the World Health Organization, Coronavirus disease or COVID-19 is an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Most people infected with this virus will experience mild to moderate respiratory illness and recover without requiring special treatment, However, there could be some cases of seriously ill patients who may require medical attention. It is also because of the other existing medical conditions like cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, chronic respiratory diseases, cancers, or older age.
The best way to protect against this virus is by following social isolation form those who are infected, using mask to prevent droplets from infecting others when you cough or sneeze and to wash your hands for 20 seconds frequently.
RSV or Respiratory Syncytial Virus: As per the Centers of Diseases Control and Prevention (CDC), RSV is a common respiratory virus that infects nose, throat and lungs. Though symptoms are similar to the viruses like flu or COVID-19, the disease in itself is different. It also peaks during the winter season, especially between December and January.
However, the main difference between RSV and other respiratory illness, above mentioned is that RSV can cause pneumonia or bronchiolitis, especially for those who are over the age of 50 or with an existing heart or lung disease.
Norovirus: It is a number 1 cause of foodborne illness in the US and this happens when virus gets into the food and then it accidentally enters your mouth. These particles are from faeces or vomit from infected people, or can be transmitted via contaminated food and water. It could also spread by touching unclean surfaces like door handles or cutlery.
For most people, having norovirus is unpleasant, but mild and recovery could be made in 1 to 2 days. However, it could be more serious for babies, older people and anyone with any existing health condition.
Credit: AI
Endometriosis is usually characterised by painful periods, chronic pelvic pain and fertility issues. But a new study suggests the condition may also be linked to a significantly higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes.
Researchers found that women with endometriosis had a 46% higher risk of type 2 diabetes compared with women without the condition.
The findings come from one of the largest studies to examine the relationship between the two conditions, adding a new dimension to the adverse effects of endometriosis.
Also read: 'My Periods Are Painful' Is Not Always Normal: When Could It Be A Sign of Endometriosis?
Researchers studied health records from nearly 3 million women in the Utah Population Database, covering the period from 1996 to 2021. Almost 100,000 women were diagnosed with endometriosis.
After accounting for factors including age, race and body mass index, women with endometriosis were found to have a 46% greater risk of developing type 2 diabetes than women without the condition. The researchers also found that the association differed depending on the type of endometriosis.
Additionally, the risk of type 2 diabetes was higher across several subtypes, including superficial peritoneal, ovarian and deep infiltrating endometriosis.
The strongest association was seen in women with endometriosis outside the usual pelvic sites, where the risk was about twice as high. Adenomyosis was also associated with an increased risk.
Also read: Maternal Anemia: Why It’s A Major Pregnancy Risk For Indian Women And How to Prevent It
Chronic inflammation could be the reason why the two disorders could be connected. Endometriosis is an inflammatory disease in which tissue resembling the lining of the uterus grows outside the uterus.
Persistent inflammation can affect several systems in the body, while inflammation and poor insulin sensitivity could lead to type 2 diabetes.
“Previous studies largely evaluated endometriosis as a single condition and generally reported little or no overall association with type 2 diabetes,” said Fuzak Nunziato, lead author of the study. “Our findings add to a growing understanding that endometriosis may affect more than reproductive health alone.”
Despite the strong observation, it is to be noted that study found an association, meaning women with endometriosis were more likely to develop type 2 diabetes. It does not prove that endometriosis directly causes type 2 diabetes.
The study was also retrospective, meaning researchers looked back at archival health records rather than assigning participants to groups and studying them prospectively.
A large prospective research published in 2021 found no overall significant increase in type 2 diabetes among women with laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis, although it did find modestly higher risks among certain groups, including women who were not obese.
The association was particularly notable among premenopausal women and women without obesity - groups that are not normally not considered to be at the highest risk for type 2 diabetes.
If further research solidifies the the link, researchers say women with endometriosis could potentially benefit from greater awareness of metabolic health and earlier identification of diabetes risk.
Credit: AI
A one-time gene-editing treatment has been reported to lower bad cholesterol (LDL) by as much as 62% in an early clinical trial, raising hopes that high cholesterol could one day be treated without everyday pills.
The experimental treatment, VERVE-102, is designed to make a long-term genetic change in the liver. Researchers say it could eventually offer a new way of managing high cholesterol, although it is still years away from standard use. The latest results have been described as an “extremely exciting milestone” by researchers.
VERVE-102 targets a gene called PCSK9, which plays an important role in controlling how much LDL cholesterol circulates in the bloodstream.
The treatment uses base editing, a form of gene editing, to switch off the PCSK9 gene in liver cells. PCSK9 reduces the liver’s ability to remove LDL cholesterol from the blood.
By permanently disabling the gene, researchers hope to reproduce the effect seen in people who naturally have PCSK9 variants that keep their cholesterol low and their risk of coronary heart disease reduced.
The treatment is delivered through a single intravenous infusion containing the gene-editing machinery packaged inside a lipid nanoparticle.
Also read: How To Read Your Blood Test Results: A Simple Guide To What Your Numbers Mean
The Phase 1b Heart-2 trial involved 35 adults with either heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia, an inherited condition that leads to high cholesterol, or premature coronary artery disease. Participants received a single infusion at different doses.
At the highest dose tested, LDL cholesterol fell by an average of 62%, while PCSK9 levels fell by as much as 88%. The reductions sustained during follow-up, with some being observed for up to 18 months.
The study was published in the New England Journal of Medicine, making the findings particularly notable because they provide the first clinical evidence that this type of in-body gene editing can produce a substantial and potentially durable cholesterol reduction.
Also read: Stopping Statins After 75 May Not Raise Death Risk In Low-Risk Adults: The Lancet Study
The clinical trial was small and still early-stage. It was designed to examine safety and whether the treatment produces the expected biological effect, not to prove that VERVE-102 prevents heart attacks or strokes by lowering cholesterol. Researchers also need to understand the consequences of permanently altering PCSK9 over many years.
The trial did not report any serious adverse events related to the treatment or dose-limiting toxicities, although some participants experienced fatigue and other reactions.
Dr Riyaz Patel, a cardiologist at Barts Health NHS Trust and professor at University College London, said the early results provide encouraging evidence that PCSK9 base editing could eventually offer “substantial and durable” LDL reduction with a one-time treatment.
Statins and other cholesterol-reducing medicines generally require regular, continued treatment. VERVE-102 is attempting to change the liver’s system of regulating cholesterol.
That could be particularly useful for people who struggle to take medication consistently or whose cholesterol remains dangerously high despite existing treatments.
Despite the promising results, calling VERVE-102 a 'cure' for high cholesterol would be premature. Eli Lilly plans to begin a Phase 2 trial by the end of 2026, which should provide more information about the treatment’s safety, effectiveness and durability.
Credit: AI
Men in the UK could face limited access to prostate cancer testing under updated guidance that gives GPs authority to decide if some men without symptoms should receive a PSA blood test.
The development comes after the UK Government rejected calls for routine prostate cancer screening for all men. It instead backed a targeted approach in which those at highest genetic risk would be considered first.
Under existing NHS guidance, men aged 50 and over can request a PSA test after discussing the benefits and limitations with their GP.
The new guidance states that the decision to authorise PSA testing ultimately rests with the doctor. Recent reports suggested that the policy has sparked criticism from cancer charities and campaigners.
Regardless, a PSA test can find prostate cancer, but it cannot reliably tell doctors which cancers are dangerous and which may be manageable with treatment.
The UK National Screening Committee (UK NSC) concluded in May that routine screening of the whole male population could do more harm than good.
It said that for every 1,000 men aged 50 to 60 screened using PSA, up to two lives could be saved, but as many as 20 men could experience overdiagnosis.
Also read: Prostate Cancer: NHS England's New Precision Radiotherapy Offers Hope In Just 5 Sessions
The UK NSC has recommended targeted screening every two years for a much smaller group who are more likely to get prostate cancer. It includes men in the age group of 45 to 61 who have a BRCA2 gene variant and a family history of breast, ovarian, pancreatic or prostate cancer.
Importantly, the committee did not recommend targeted screening for other groups at higher risk, including Black men or men with a family history but no BRCA2 variant. It said that more evidence is needed to take a call on those matters.
PSA, or prostate-specific antigen, is a protein produced by prostate cells. Higher levels can be associated with prostate cancer. But they can also increase because of non-cancerous prostate enlargement or inflammation.
This means screening can produce false alarms and lead to biopsies or treatment that some men may never need. Cancer Research UK says PSA testing may also fail to detect some prostate cancers.
Also read: Testicular Cancer Warning: Be Vigilant About These Unnoticeable Signs, Doctor Warns
Black men have a substantially higher risk of developing and dying from prostate cancer, but the UK NSC said there is currently insufficient evidence to establish whether routine screening of Black men would help.
At the same time, the UK Government has expanded access for Black men to the TRANSFORM prostate cancer screening trial, which is designed to find a better way of detecting clinically significant prostate cancer.
The change does not mean PSA testing is being banned. Men with symptoms or particular risk factors can still be assessed by their GP, and doctors can request testing when it is clinically appropriate.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited