Credit-Canva
Many people believe that the modern-day skincare trends are a scam made by the big pharma companies who wish to make more money. This is a recent trend of ‘Anti-Aging’ skincare that keeps yourself on toes for the innate need for women to stay ‘young’ if they wish to be desirable. The beauty industry, in a way, feeds on such societal-made insecurities. But the recent rise in the trend has taken a different turn. While before people did it before to look prettier or fairer, now people are looking at this skincare routine as a way of taking care of themselves rather than doing to match someone else's beauty standards. This is why, this trend has resurfaced in the skin care community. This is the blue light routine.
In today's digital age, where we spend countless hours looking at screens, from phones and tablets to laptops. This constant screen time exposes us to blue light, which research suggests can have negative effects on our skin. It also leads to premature aging and dark spots. The screens also leads to stress, which could further cause harm to skin. While ditching our devices isn't realistic, a growing number of skincare products claim to protect against blue light. But do these products actually work?
You can find many skincare products that say they protect against blue light, like sprays, creams, gels, and sunscreens. Some promise to undo the damage blue light might cause, while others try to prevent it in the first place. Blue light sunscreens are special because they protect against both the sun's UV rays and blue light. This is what regular sunscreens don't do very well. Regular sunscreens, whether they use chemicals or minerals, don't block blue light as effectively.
However, tinted sunscreens are different. Tinted sunscreens with SPF 30 or higher can protect your skin from blue light, as well as UVA and UVB rays from the sun. This is because of the coloring in the tint. Some newer sunscreens also have special ingredients that help protect against visible light, including blue light. While scientists are still learning about how blue light affects skin, many skin doctors have found it to be helpful for skin.
Blue light comes from screens, TVs, and even the sun. While we used to worry mostly about how it affects our eyes and sleep, now we're learning it might also affect our skin. Some studies show that too much blue light can damage skin cells and speed up aging, leading to wrinkles and uneven skin tone. It can also cause dark spots on the skin. This happens because blue light can cause something called "oxidative stress" in the skin, which is linked to aging. It leads to dead skin cells. Blue light goes deeper into the skin than the sun's UV rays and can make skin cells produce more pigment, causing dark spots. It's important to know that not all blue light is bad. There is a difference between the blue light that comes out of the screens and the blue light that is used from a certain blue light wavelength as a therapy. The latter is used by doctors to treat acne and some skin cancers.
Credits: Canva and X
A diagnostic report from Madhya Pradesh’s Satna district has sparked shock and concern after it incorrectly stated that a 47-year-old man had a uterus. The incident has raised serious questions about negligence and accuracy in medical testing.
The report was issued to Niranjan Prajapati, chairman of the Uchehra Nagar Panchayat, who had gone for a sonography after experiencing abdominal pain and swelling. Instead of clarity about his condition, he received a report that appeared to describe female reproductive organs, including an inverted uterus.
Prajapati underwent the ultrasound at a diagnostic center on Station Road in Satna on January 13. Initially, he did not closely examine the report and followed the prescribed treatment. However, when his condition did not improve, he sought further medical advice.
“I was sick and had stomach pain. I first got treatment in Unchahara and then went for sonography in Satna,” Prajapati said. “I did not pay much attention to the report at first and took medicines, but there was no relief.”
He later visited a doctor in Jabalpur, where the mistake was clearly identified. “The doctor told me straight that this report cannot belong to me,” Prajapati recalled. “I said the report has my name on it, but it mentioned a uterus. That is when I realized something was seriously wrong.”
The report not only listed a uterus but also described its position, despite the patient being male. Medical experts say such an error goes far beyond a minor clerical mistake.
A senior doctor, speaking on condition of anonymity, said incorrect diagnostic reports can have serious consequences. “A wrong sonography report can mislead treatment, cause unnecessary stress to the patient, and in some cases become life-threatening if doctors act on false findings,” the expert said.
Attempts to seek clarification from the diagnostic center did not yield answers. Dr Arvind Saraf, associated with the facility, declined to comment on the incident, adding to concerns about accountability and quality checks.
Following the incident, Prajapati filed a formal complaint at the local police station. The matter has also been taken up by the Health Department.
Chief Medical and Health Officer of Satna, Dr Manoj Shukla, confirmed that an investigation is underway. “This complaint has come to my notice. We are examining the report thoroughly. If any irregularity or negligence is found during the investigation, appropriate action will be taken,” he said.
Officials are expected to review how the report was generated and whether standard diagnostic protocols were followed.
Sonography, also known as ultrasound, is a commonly used imaging test that uses sound waves to create images of internal organs. It does not involve radiation and is generally considered safe. However, experts stress that accuracy and proper verification are crucial, as reports directly guide diagnosis and treatment.
The incident has once again highlighted the need for stricter checks and accountability in diagnostic services, especially when errors can directly affect patient health and trust in the medical system.
Credits: Screengrab and Wikimedia Commons
Josie Gibson, English TV personality, opened up about her secret health disorder and that she is turning to a "last resort" surgery for the same. She revealed that this health challenge has left her with extreme pain. This Morning presenter, 40, appeared on the show and spoke to Cat Deeley and Ben Shephard about being diagnosed and having a "lipodema" body. She said, "A couple of years ago somebody actually said on Instagram, 'you have got a typical lipodema body'. I thought, 'what's lipedema?'"
She said she did not even have a clue, but she knew something was not right. But she did not know what lipedema was. She got diagnosed about a year ago and had a surgery. She told her fans that she has been "constantly fighting" her genetics.
Speaking on ITV’s This Morning, Gibson said surgery was a “last resort” but described herself as happy with the results after spending around £7,000 on liposuction to treat her calves. She explained that the procedure, which combines liposuction with a technique that tightens the skin, had to be carried out in stages.
“The last thing I want to do is put myself through surgery, but it was my last resort,” she said, adding that she had only treated her calves so far. Gibson said the change in her appearance had been significant, telling viewers: “All my life I have wanted to have ankles. I’ve finally got them.”
Lipoedema is a condition that mainly affects women and causes an abnormal build-up of fat, most commonly in the legs and sometimes the arms. It can make the lower body appear out of proportion and is often associated with pain, tenderness and a feeling of heaviness.

Gibson said she had always felt something “wasn’t right” with her body but was only diagnosed with lipoedema last September. She said specialists told her that diet and exercise would not remove the affected fat. “They said I could train seven days a week and I wouldn’t get rid of lipoedema fat like that,” she said.
Describing the impact of the condition, Gibson said her legs felt increasingly out of place compared with the rest of her body and that symptoms had worsened over time, now also affecting her arms. “I could train, train and train but really, I’m going down the surgery route now,” she added.
Lipoedema specialist Dr Dennis Wolf, who also appeared on the programme, said the condition is not currently treated on the NHS due to the lack of a formal diagnostic test and limited research. He said doctors often rely on symptoms and patient experiences to identify it and believes some people may have a genetic predisposition.
Dr Wolf explained that lipoedema fat is resistant to weight loss, meaning people can exercise and diet without seeing changes in affected areas. While surgery is the most common way to manage the condition, other treatments include compression garments to help reduce discomfort.
Gibson also shared a light-hearted moment from her surgery, admitting the anaesthetic left her flirtatious and apologetic towards her surgeons.
Credits: Canva
Fewer people are dying of heart disease, however, as per a new report from the American Heart Association (AHA), it is still the leading cause of death in the US. While the report noted a drop in rates of deaths by heart diseases for the first time in five years, the report also noted that it kills more American than any other condition. The report was published early Wednesday in the journal Circulation.
The report found that annual rates of heart disease deaths have in fact decreased by 2.7% between 2022 and 2023. This means it went from 941,652 to 915, 973. However, cardiovascular diseases still killed more people in the US than cancer and accidents combined.
The report found that deaths caused by blockages in the coronary arteries, the blood vessels supplying the heart, fell by 5.9%, dropping from 371,506 to 349,470 over the same period. Coronary artery disease, a major cause of heart attacks, still claims two lives every three minutes. Other vessel-damaging chronic conditions also remain widespread.
The report found that the share of U.S. adults with high blood pressure edged up to 47.3%, while overall obesity rates dipped slightly to 50%. However, obesity is increasing among children and teenagers, rising from 25.4% to 28.1% in those aged 2 to 19.
Prevention remains the most powerful tool to reduce heart disease deaths, experts say. Because heart disease cannot be cured, waiting for symptoms often means focusing only on treatment rather than stopping the problem early. Early prevention, by contrast, has a much bigger impact on saving lives.
The report highlights four key lifestyle habits for heart health: eating a balanced diet, staying physically active, getting enough sleep and avoiding tobacco. It also stresses four important health measures: managing weight, cholesterol, blood sugar and blood pressure.
Together, these eight factors could prevent up to 40% of heart disease deaths and cut the risk of developing serious heart disease symptoms by as much as 74%. These same habits also benefit the brain, helping slow brain ageing and lower the risk of dementia, especially by keeping blood pressure under control.
Cutting down cardiovascular disease in the U.S. would not only help people live healthier lives, it could also ease the strain on the economy, experts say. Heart disease carries a massive financial cost, with an estimated $414.7 billion spent each year on direct treatment and indirect losses between 2021 and 2022.
Even though the benefits of healthy habits are well known, getting people to prioritize heart health remains difficult. Only one in four U.S. adults meets national guidelines for both aerobic and muscle-strengthening exercise. Control of chronic conditions is also lacking, with less than half of Americans with type 2 diabetes managing their disease effectively.
Experts stress that regular physical activity, tailored to individual ability, can make a real difference. Simple, consistent movement and timely health checkups can go a long way in protecting both personal health and the wider economy.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited