Is It Safe To Get A Mammogram During Pregnancy?

Updated Feb 20, 2025 | 02:00 AM IST

SummaryMammograms use low-dose radiation, with a single screening exposing patients to about 0.4 millisieverts—equivalent to seven weeks of natural background radiation. Only 1 in 3,000 pregnant women are diagnosed with breast cancer.
Is It Safe To Get A Mammogram During Pregnancy?

Image Credit: Health and me

Pregnancy is accompanied by a lengthy list of do's and don'ts—take prenatal vitamins, no alcohol, exercise carefully, and eat well. But what about when an unplanned health issue presents itself, such as the necessity for a mammogram? For most women, this might not even be something they think about until they are in a position where breast cancer screening is an option.

Perhaps you're over 40 and in need of your yearly mammogram, or perhaps you have a history of breast cancer in your family and you want to keep your screenings current. More emergently, you've found a lump in your breast. So, can you have a mammogram when pregnant? The answer is yes, but there are several things to consider.

Pregnancy creates substantial hormonal changes that affect the body, as well as breast tissue. Estrogen and progesterone's rise causes the breasts to expand and condition to produce milk, which results in denser tissue. This increased density is more challenging to detect any abnormalities with using mammograms. Even post-delivery, should the woman be breastfeeding, milk-filled glands can also make the breasts denser and, as a result, make mammogram readings less clear.

While 3D mammograms have improved imaging technology to help navigate dense breast tissue, doctors often suggest postponing routine screening mammograms until after pregnancy if there are no symptoms or high-risk factors. However, if a lump or abnormality is found, your doctor may recommend immediate diagnostic imaging.

When Is a Mammogram Necessary During Pregnancy?

Mammograms are not done routinely if a woman becomes pregnant, yet there are specific situations where one might be unavoidable. Breast cancer in pregnancy does occur—1 in 3,000 times—but it's not common. If a lump is detected by a woman, she has constant breast pain and no explanation, or she is at high risk (e.g., strong history of breast cancer in her family or genetic defect such as BRCA1 or BRCA2), a physician will order a mammogram.

The process itself takes very little radiation exposure. The radiation employed by a mammogram is concentrated on the breast, and there is little to no radiation that reaches other areas of the body. A lead apron is also placed over the belly to shield the unborn child.

Alternative Breast Imaging Options During Pregnancy

For pregnant women requiring breast imaging, physicians may initially suggest an ultrasound. In contrast to a mammogram, an ultrasound is not done with the use of radiation and is deemed safe for pregnant women.

An ultrasound of the breast can establish whether a lump is a fluid-filled cyst or a solid tumor that needs further investigation. Yet ultrasounds are not always diagnostic, and in certain instances, a mammogram or biopsy is needed to determine or rule out cancer.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is also an imaging choice but has some drawbacks. The majority of breast MRIs employ a contrast material called gadolinium, which is able to pass through the placenta and to the fetus. Although risks are not entirely clear, physicians usually do not use MRI with contrast unless necessary. Some practitioners may offer an MRI without contrast as an option.

What If You Find a Lump In Your Breast During Pregnancy?

Breast changes throughout pregnancy are normal, but finding a lump should never be taken lightly. If you notice a lump, alert your medical provider right away. They will conduct a clinical breast exam and potentially have you get an imaging study such as an ultrasound or mammogram to see whether anything needs to be done.

If imaging indicates a suspicious mass, a biopsy can be suggested. Core needle biopsy is the most frequently used and is safe during pregnancy. It consists of numbing the skin with local anesthetic and inserting a hollow needle into the area to obtain a small sample of tissue to be tested.

Breast Cancer Treatment During Pregnancy

In the extremely uncommon event of a diagnosis of breast cancer while pregnant, therapy will be determined by the nature and extent of cancer and by how far along in pregnancy one is. The most frequent form of treatment is surgery—either mastectomy (surgical removal of the entire breast) or lumpectomy (surgical removal of the lump)—which is usually safe while pregnant.

Chemotherapy is also possible but usually only attempted after the first trimester, when it can damage developing fetal tissue. Radiation therapy is not used during pregnancy and is typically deferred until after giving birth. Hormonal therapy and targeted therapies are also omitted until after giving birth.

Can I Get a Mammogram While Breastfeeding?

Yes, you can have a mammogram while you are breastfeeding. The radiation in a mammogram does not impact breast milk or hurt the baby. But breast density is still high during lactation, and this might complicate detection of abnormalities. To enhance image quality, physicians usually advise breastfeeding or pumping 30 minutes prior to the mammogram.

Routine screening mammograms are usually delayed in pregnancy unless there is a high-level concern.

If a lump is detected, an ultrasound is typically the initial imaging study done, with a mammogram being a consideration if additional assessment is necessary.

  • Pregnancy mammograms utilize minimal radiation and are safe when required.
  • Breast MRI with contrast is usually avoided in pregnancy.
  • Breast biopsy, when necessary, is safe during pregnancy.

If breast cancer does develop during pregnancy, there are available treatment options that can be adjusted to keep the mother and infant safe.

Pregnancy is a period of significant change, and health issues particularly those involving breast health, are anxiety-provoking. Routine mammograms are typically postponed until after giving birth, but diagnostic testing can be done if necessary. The best you can do is discuss changes you notice in your breasts with your healthcare provider in an open manner. Early detection and prompt treatment can make a very big difference in the health of both mother and fetus.

End of Article

I'm Not Afraid Of Germs, I Snorted Cocaine Off Toilet Seats, Says US Secretary of Health, RFK Jr

Updated Feb 15, 2026 | 02:16 AM IST

SummaryUS Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said he once snorted cocaine off toilet seats and was unafraid of germs, drawing criticism. Experts note bacterial exposure does not confer viral immunity, amid his longstanding controversial vaccine views.
I'm Not Afraid Of Germs, I Snorted Cocaine Off Toilet Seats, Says US Secretary of Health, RFK Jr

Credits: Screengrab from podcast

"I'm not scared of a germ, I used to snort cocaine off of toilet seats," said the US Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F Kennedy Jr. Now 72, he said during a Theo Von podcast that he continued with in-person rehab meeting during pandemic due to his addiction because of his robust approach to infection.

In a statement, he said, "I said, ‘I don’t care what happens, I’m going to a meeting every day’,” he told Von. “I said, ‘I’m not scared of a germ — I used to snort cocaine off of toilet seats — and I know this disease [addiction] will kill me if I don’t treat it, which means, for me, going to meetings every day … for me, it was survival.”

Read: RFK Jr. Removes Entire CDC Vaccine Advisory Committee

What Is Wrong With RFK Jr's Statement?

While toilet seat may not be the dirtiest item in an average household, as scientists, including professor of microbiology at the University of Arizona, Dr Chuck Gerba told BBC that there are other dirtier items too. The statement to snort off a toilet seat could have a wrong tone.

While there exist other items with more bacteria than toilet, it is no safe to snort things off toilet seat and absolutely not to do drugs and to brag about it. This feels especially off when it comes from a Health Secretary.

On an average, a toilet seat typically has around 50 to 3,000 bacteria per square inch. A toilet seat could have many bacteria, including E. coli, Salmonella, norovirus and Shigella. They can cause gastrointestinal distress.

What is wrong with RFK Jr.'s statement is that having frequent encounters with fecal bacteria will not scientifically make him immune against the respiratory viruses which were common during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Read: Who is Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the Controversial Nominee for U.S. Health Secretary?

This is because bacteria are single-celled, living organisms that can live independently, while viruses are much smaller, non-living agents and require a host cell to reproduce. The basic difference in its composition and how they function after entering the body is the reason why exposure to bacteria does not necessarily means one is protected or has immunity against a virus.

RFK Jr And His Anti-Vaxxer Stance

He is the nephew of former US President John F Kennedy popularly known as JFK, who was a democratic candidate. However, RFK Jr., who earlier filed candidature as a Democrat, then switched to an independent candidate and endorsed Trump heavily.

RFK Jr. works closely with many anti-vaccine activists who work for his nonprofit group Children's Health Defense. While in his recent speech, he said that he has "never been anti-vax and have never told the public to avoid vaccination", his track record shows otherwise.

In a podcast interview, he said, "There is no vaccine that is safe and effective" and told FOX News that he still believes in the now long-debunked idea that vaccines can cause autism. In another 2021 podcast, he urged people to "resist" CDC guidelines on getting their kids vaccinated. "I see somebody on a hiking trail carrying a little baby and I say to him, better not get them vaccinated," he said.

His non-profit also led an anti-vax campaign sticker and he appeared next on the screen to a sticker that read: "If you are not an anti-vaxxer you are not paying attention," reports AP.

End of Article

Over 38,000 Prescriptions Of Wegovy Pill In 5th Week After Its Launch

Updated Feb 14, 2026 | 11:00 PM IST

SummaryFive weeks after launch, Novo Nordisk’s oral Wegovy recorded 38,220 US prescriptions, boosting shares 4 percent. Studies show up to 13.6 percent average weight loss over 64 weeks, though nausea and digestive issues remain common side effects.
Over 38,000 Prescriptions Of Wegovy Pill In 5th Week After Its Launch

Credits: Britannica

Five weeks after the launch of Novo Nordisk's weight loss pill, Wegovy, 38,220 US prescriptions have been reported by IQVIA for the same. The company shares too climbed up by 4% on Friday, and touched the levels last seen in October.

The oral version of the Wegovy pill became available to US patients earlier this month after the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved it in December.

How Effective Is The Wegovy Pill?

After injection by Novo Nordisk, of the same name, Wegovy, which has been on the market since 2021, its popularity grew so much that it was in short supply until February 2025. The pill version has now come out, which many experts believe will expand its accessibility. As the monthly supply of pill is expected to be cheaper than the monthly supply of the weight loss injection.

A study published in the New England Journal of Medicine show that a 25 milligram Wegovy pill led to 13.6% reduction in weight on average over 64 weeks. When compared to placebo, the result was only 2.2% of weight loss. Novo Nordisk says that those who stayed on the treatment and reduced their calorie intake, it would lead to a loss of 16.6% of their weight.

How To Use The Weight Loss Pill?

The first step lies in buying the correct and safe weight loss pill. Make sure the weight loss pills are clinically proven option for people to use to reduce their weight.

Take the pill with a glass of water. Make sure to always have the pill prescribed and follow the instructions that you GP has told. Store the pill in a cold place, however avoid freezing the medicine. Keep the medicine out of a child's reach. In some weight loss pills, if you miss your dosage, you can take it within 1 hour, however, clarify these doubts from your GP. A pill can usually be consumed within an hour of a fat-containing meal up to three times a day., however, the Wegovy pill must be taken on an empty stomach. Patients are advised not to eat, drink, or take other medicines for at least 30 minutes afterward. Thus, one must follow what is being prescribed for the best result, as the administering of the pill could vary based on the medication.

Most importantly, a healthy balanced diet, and a regular workout routine is also important will the person is on the pill.

Read: Wegovy Starter Dose Now Available As Daily Pill, Replacing Weekly Injections

What Are The Side Effects Of Wegovy Pill?

Digestive problems such as nausea and vomiting remain the most common side effects of GLP-1 drugs. These issues were also reported in studies of the pill versions. Around 7 percent of participants taking the Wegovy pill stopped treatment because of side effects, compared with 6 percent in the placebo group. In orforglipron’s trial, up to 10 percent of patients discontinued treatment, compared with 3 percent on placebo.

One key difference lies in how the medications are used. The Wegovy pill must be taken on an empty stomach with a small amount of water. Patients are advised not to eat, drink, or take other medicines for at least 30 minutes afterward. Doctors say this requirement has limited the use of Rybelsus, the pill form of semaglutide approved for diabetes, compared with Ozempic.

Eli Lilly highlights that orforglipron was taken once daily in trials without restrictions on food or water, which may make it easier for patients to use consistently.

End of Article

Women Heart Symptoms Could Differ From Men, Explains Expert

Updated Feb 14, 2026 | 08:11 PM IST

SummaryHeart disease is the leading cause of death in women, yet symptoms often differ from men and go unnoticed. Experts urge greater awareness of hormonal changes, reproductive aging, and earlier screening to prevent avoidable deaths.
Women Heart Symptoms Could Differ From Men, Explains Expert

Credits: Canva

On February 13, Canadians across the country mark Wear Red Canada Day, a reminder that heart disease remains the leading cause of death for women. Yet despite the scale of the problem, many women still do not recognize their risk or their symptoms.

“We’re learning more and more each day about how heart disease uniquely affects women,” said nurse practitioner and researcher Rachel Ollivier in an interview with CTV News. She emphasized that awareness is still lagging, both among patients and within health-care systems.

According to the World Health Organization, cardiovascular disease accounts for roughly one in three deaths among women globally. In Canada, heart disease and stroke continue to be leading causes of death among women, and women are less likely than men to receive timely diagnosis or treatment.

Symptoms Can Look Different

Chest pain remains the most common heart attack symptom in both men and women. But Ollivier explained that women’s symptoms can often be subtler or feel different.

“For women, they often uniquely experience chest pain that seems like more of a discomfort or a tightness in the chest,” she said. Some women may feel pain in the left arm or jaw, unusual fatigue, nausea, vomiting, or discomfort between the shoulder blades.

Because these symptoms can be less specific, they are sometimes dismissed as stress, anxiety, indigestion, or exhaustion. Social factors also play a role. Women often juggle multiple responsibilities at home and work, and may delay seeking care. In some cases, their concerns may also be minimized within health-care settings.

Medical differences matter too. Women typically have smaller hearts and arteries, and plaque buildup behaves differently compared to men. Conditions such as spontaneous coronary artery dissection and microvascular dysfunction are seen more commonly in women, making diagnosis more complex.

Hormones and the Hidden Risk Window

Beyond symptoms, experts are urging greater recognition of the role hormones play in lifelong heart health.

“Endogenous estrogen is cardio protective,” Ollivier explained. As women enter the perimenopausal transition, estrogen levels fluctuate and gradually decline, and that protection is lost. This shift can lead to higher cholesterol levels and changes in fat distribution, increasing cardiovascular risk, particularly between the ages of 40 and 60.

Colleen Norris, a nursing professor at the University of Alberta and research lead of the CKHui LHHW Women’s Heart Health Research Collaborative who wrote on Yahoo Canada, believes the conversation needs to go even deeper.

She argues that ovaries have long been viewed only through the lens of reproduction. “The ovaries are not just reproductive organs. They are architects of women’s health across the lifespan,” she noted. Estrogen influences the heart and blood vessels, but also the brain, bones, kidneys, metabolism, and immune function.

Most women are never told that ovarian reserve and estrogen levels begin declining in their late 30s. By the time noticeable symptoms appear, biological changes may have already been underway for years.

Menopause itself is just one day, Norris explained. The larger reproductive transition surrounding it is what significantly increases vulnerability to chronic disease. Yet the health-care system often waits until disease develops before intervening.

Moving From Awareness to Action

Both experts stress that education is critical. Women with conditions such as polycystic ovary syndrome, pregnancy complications like preeclampsia or gestational diabetes, and those entering midlife should be particularly mindful of their cardiovascular risk.

Wear Red Canada Day is meant to spark awareness, but symbols alone are not enough. Experts are calling for better research funding focused on midlife women, improved medical education around ovarian aging, and more proactive screening during the reproductive transition.

Heart disease in women is not inevitable. But recognizing that symptoms can differ, and that hormonal shifts matter, could be lifesaving.

End of Article