Pregnancy is accompanied by a lengthy list of do's and don'ts—take prenatal vitamins, no alcohol, exercise carefully, and eat well. But what about when an unplanned health issue presents itself, such as the necessity for a mammogram? For most women, this might not even be something they think about until they are in a position where breast cancer screening is an option.

Perhaps you're over 40 and in need of your yearly mammogram, or perhaps you have a history of breast cancer in your family and you want to keep your screenings current. More emergently, you've found a lump in your breast. So, can you have a mammogram when pregnant? The answer is yes, but there are several things to consider.

Pregnancy creates substantial hormonal changes that affect the body, as well as breast tissue. Estrogen and progesterone's rise causes the breasts to expand and condition to produce milk, which results in denser tissue. This increased density is more challenging to detect any abnormalities with using mammograms. Even post-delivery, should the woman be breastfeeding, milk-filled glands can also make the breasts denser and, as a result, make mammogram readings less clear.

While 3D mammograms have improved imaging technology to help navigate dense breast tissue, doctors often suggest postponing routine screening mammograms until after pregnancy if there are no symptoms or high-risk factors. However, if a lump or abnormality is found, your doctor may recommend immediate diagnostic imaging.

When Is a Mammogram Necessary During Pregnancy?

Mammograms are not done routinely if a woman becomes pregnant, yet there are specific situations where one might be unavoidable. Breast cancer in pregnancy does occur—1 in 3,000 times—but it's not common. If a lump is detected by a woman, she has constant breast pain and no explanation, or she is at high risk (e.g., strong history of breast cancer in her family or genetic defect such as BRCA1 or BRCA2), a physician will order a mammogram.

The process itself takes very little radiation exposure. The radiation employed by a mammogram is concentrated on the breast, and there is little to no radiation that reaches other areas of the body. A lead apron is also placed over the belly to shield the unborn child.

Alternative Breast Imaging Options During Pregnancy

For pregnant women requiring breast imaging, physicians may initially suggest an ultrasound. In contrast to a mammogram, an ultrasound is not done with the use of radiation and is deemed safe for pregnant women.

An ultrasound of the breast can establish whether a lump is a fluid-filled cyst or a solid tumor that needs further investigation. Yet ultrasounds are not always diagnostic, and in certain instances, a mammogram or biopsy is needed to determine or rule out cancer.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is also an imaging choice but has some drawbacks. The majority of breast MRIs employ a contrast material called gadolinium, which is able to pass through the placenta and to the fetus. Although risks are not entirely clear, physicians usually do not use MRI with contrast unless necessary. Some practitioners may offer an MRI without contrast as an option.

What If You Find a Lump In Your Breast During Pregnancy?

Breast changes throughout pregnancy are normal, but finding a lump should never be taken lightly. If you notice a lump, alert your medical provider right away. They will conduct a clinical breast exam and potentially have you get an imaging study such as an ultrasound or mammogram to see whether anything needs to be done.

If imaging indicates a suspicious mass, a biopsy can be suggested. Core needle biopsy is the most frequently used and is safe during pregnancy. It consists of numbing the skin with local anesthetic and inserting a hollow needle into the area to obtain a small sample of tissue to be tested.

Breast Cancer Treatment During Pregnancy

In the extremely uncommon event of a diagnosis of breast cancer while pregnant, therapy will be determined by the nature and extent of cancer and by how far along in pregnancy one is. The most frequent form of treatment is surgery—either mastectomy (surgical removal of the entire breast) or lumpectomy (surgical removal of the lump)—which is usually safe while pregnant.

Chemotherapy is also possible but usually only attempted after the first trimester, when it can damage developing fetal tissue. Radiation therapy is not used during pregnancy and is typically deferred until after giving birth. Hormonal therapy and targeted therapies are also omitted until after giving birth.

Can I Get a Mammogram While Breastfeeding?

Yes, you can have a mammogram while you are breastfeeding. The radiation in a mammogram does not impact breast milk or hurt the baby. But breast density is still high during lactation, and this might complicate detection of abnormalities. To enhance image quality, physicians usually advise breastfeeding or pumping 30 minutes prior to the mammogram.

Routine screening mammograms are usually delayed in pregnancy unless there is a high-level concern.

If a lump is detected, an ultrasound is typically the initial imaging study done, with a mammogram being a consideration if additional assessment is necessary.

• Pregnancy mammograms utilize minimal radiation and are safe when required.
• Breast MRI with contrast is usually avoided in pregnancy.
• Breast biopsy, when necessary, is safe during pregnancy.

If breast cancer does develop during pregnancy, there are available treatment options that can be adjusted to keep the mother and infant safe.

Pregnancy is a period of significant change, and health issues particularly those involving breast health, are anxiety-provoking. Routine mammograms are typically postponed until after giving birth, but diagnostic testing can be done if necessary. The best you can do is discuss changes you notice in your breasts with your healthcare provider in an open manner. Early detection and prompt treatment can make a very big difference in the health of both mother and fetus.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved tradipitant to be sold under the brand name Nereus, for the prevention of vomiting induced by motion in adults — a first in the last four decades.

Motion sickness affects an estimated 65 to 78 million Americans—roughly 25 to 30 percent of adults—during everyday travel by car, plane, or boat. For decades, patients have had no meaningful new treatment options.

Tradipitant is an oral neurokinin-1 (NK-1) receptor antagonist that prevents motion-induced vomiting in adults.

It is an oral capsule, often taken 60 minutes before travel to block signals causing nausea.

The drug by Vanda Pharmaceuticals is now commercially available across the US.

"Today marks an important milestone for the tens of millions of Americans who experience motion sickness symptoms during common travel," said Mihael H. Polymeropoulos, M.D, President, CEO, and Chairman of Vanda, in a statement.

How Tradipitant Prevents Motion Sickness?

Motion sickness occurs when the brain receives conflicting signals from the eyes, inner ear, and body while in motion. This sensory mismatch is believed to trigger the release of substance P, which activates NK-1 receptors in the central nervous system and ultimately leads to nausea and vomiting.

Tradipitant works by blocking these receptors, interrupting the vomiting pathway.

"NEREUS is a selective, high-affinity antagonist of human substance P/neurokinin-1 (NK-1) receptors that can block the vomiting center of the brain,” Polymeropoulos said.

Tradipitant was approved by the FDA, following two pivotal Phase 3 clinical trials—Motion Syros and Motion Serifos—conducted under real-world conditions on the open sea.

Also read: India Installs US FDA-approved Portable MRI For Bedside Brain Scans At AIIMS Delhi

Both studies demonstrated that tradipitant significantly prevents vomiting compared to placebo, confirming the drug's effectiveness in actual sea travel conditions. It is the first new prescription option for people with a history of motion sickness in over 40 years.

It employs a novel mechanism as a selective, high-affinity antagonist of human substance P/NK-1 receptors. It offers simple dosing with just one or two capsules a day taken approximately an hour before travel.

Is Tradipitant Safe? Are There Any Side-Effects?

Read More: CDC Warns Over Potential Surge In Measles Cases: Will The US Lose Its Elimination Status?

According to Vanda Pharmaceuticals, tradipitant may impair abilities required for driving a motor vehicle or operating heavy machinery.

Combining tradipitant with sedatives or medications that increase the drug's levels may increase this effect. If use together cannot be avoided, your doctor may warn against driving or operating heavy machinery.

The most common side effects associated with tradipitant include drowsiness, headache, and fatigue.

Moreover, strong CYP3A4 inhibitors may increase NEREUS™ levels and the risk of side effects, the company said.

There are limited data on tradipitant's use in pregnant women and children.

Tradipitant is also not recommended in patients with liver problems or severe kidney problems.

Type 2 diabetes was once rare among the young. Now, it is a common diagnosis for Indians in their 20s and 30s. The country currently faces a massive health crisis with 101 million confirmed diabetic patients and 136 million prediabetics. This sudden spike did not happen because human genetics broke down overnight. It happened because the way we live has completely transformed.

Asians (Indians ) already have a " thin- fat " body phenotype, which has a heavy genetic disadvantage. Even when an Indian person appears thin, they typically carry a much higher body fat percentage than a European person of the exact same weight. This fat builds up dangerously as visceral fat around the internal organs. Because of this, Indians develop severe insulin resistance at a much lower Body Mass Index (BMI).

Secondly, we tend to have faster beta-cell exhaustion. The pancreas simply stops producing enough insulin earlier in life.

Thirdly, if you have a positive family history, then the risk is higher and happens at an early age as compared to the previous generation.

But definitely it is not just genetics. Our DNA remains exactly the same as it was a century ago. Still, the age of onset is dropping at an alarming rate. Data from the massive ICMR-INDIAB study reveals that the real "take-off" point for diabetes now sits squarely in the 25 to 34 age bracket. Out of all the people under 25 diagnosed with diabetes today, one in four has Type 2. It used to be very rare to see anything other than Type 1 in young adults.

Now, the situation is completely different. States like Goa, Kerala, and Tamil Nadu are recording huge numbers, especially in city areas. Data collected in Tamil Nadu from 2006 to 2016 proved that the 20 to 39-year-old age group was getting sick at a faster pace than older generations. Across India, the total prevalence rate jumped from 7.1 percent to 11.4 percent. If current trends hold, we are looking at 152 million cases nationwide by 2045.

Why Diabetes Is Rising?

The absolute driver behind this youth explosion is a drastic shift in how we live. Urbanization wiped out physical activity. Young professionals sit at desks for ten hours, endure stressful commutes, and spend their remaining free time staring at screens.

Our diets worsened at the same time. Traditional balanced meals gave way to heavily refined carbohydrates and ultra-processed food, which the younger generation highly depends on. Polished white rice, refined wheat, and cheap ultra-processed foods flood our daily plates. Young people eat far less protein and fiber. This combination of daily sugar spikes and zero physical movement directly causes the abdominal obesity driving this epidemic.

The rapid rise in youth diabetes comes down to a severe gene-environment mismatch. Young Indians live in bodies biologically programmed to store fat to survive famines, but they now live in an environment of constant fast food and zero movement. We cannot rewrite our DNA. We can, however, change our daily habits.

As per RSSDI, early medical screening before age 25 is now an absolute necessity. Replacing heavy carbs with a low-carb, high-protein diet, fixing bad sleep schedules, and making time for daily physical activity can stop this crisis. Youth diabetes is entirely preventable. We just need to act before it is too late.

India holds the record for the highest number of blind individuals in the entire world. The impact that the fact can have on those who hear it should be enough to cause them to stop dead in their tracks. The fact that it is preventable makes it all the more problematic, more than just a number. According to experts from AIIMS, New Delhi, more than 85% of blindness is preventable in the country, and not due to an incurable disease or insurmountable genetic condition.

The overwhelming majority of instances of blindness in India are due to a lack of glasses, or could be prevented by a surgical procedure lasting approximately 20 minutes. And yet, we are left with millions of blind people.

What Is Preventable Blindness?

Preventable blindness refers to vision loss that could have been avoided through timely screening, treatment, correction, or surgical intervention. It is not the same as blindness caused by trauma, hereditary disorders, or conditions beyond medical reach.

The leading culprits in India are well-documented: cataract is responsible for 66.2% of all blindness cases, uncorrected refractive errors for 18.6%, glaucoma for 6.7%, and diabetic retinopathy for 3.3%. Every single one of these is either treatable or manageable with early detection.

Cataracts can be reversed in under thirty minutes. Refractive error can be corrected with spectacles that cost less than a meal at a restaurant. Diabetic retinopathy, if caught early, can be treated before it takes vision at all.

The tragedy of preventable blindness is not medical. It is systemic.

The Scale Of The Problem In India

India carries one of the heaviest burdens of vision loss in the world, and the weight is only growing. There are disparities regarding the burden of vision loss. There are about 75% of the resources and health infrastructure that are found in urban locations whereas there are only 27% of the population and most of the hundreds of millions of people living in rural India do not have access to see an eye doctor because they would need to take a day off work without pay, travel over one hundred kilometers, and pay for the office bill in cash out-of-pocket.

Most people do not try to see an eye doctor, and when they do, it is usually too late to treat the problem.

At the same time, the problem has been exacerbated by the rapidly aging population of India and the incidence of age-related disorders increasing, such as cataracts and the diabetes epidemic, which is one of the largest in the world, has been causing a massive increase in diabetic retinopathy, which will cause continuing loss of vision without proper detection. These are not isolated cases but rather a direct result of the failure of the health care system in India to keep pace with the growing number of diseases in the population.

What Can Be Done?

On the infrastructure side, the priority must be decentralization. Eye care cannot remain a service that lives primarily in urban hospitals. Vision screening needs to be integrated into primary health centers, school programs, and community outreach camps. The private sector, which runs over 70% of all eye care institutes in India, has a role, but so does public policy in incentivizing rural postings and strengthening district-level facilities.

On the workforce side, training mid-level ophthalmic personnel, optometrists, ophthalmic nurses, and vision technicians can extend the reach of a limited specialist pool significantly. Telemedicine-assisted models, where a technician in a rural camp transmits data to a city-based specialist for review, have already shown promise and need to be mainstreamed rather than treated as pilot experiments.

Early detection is arguably the most powerful lever of all. Most people in India visit an eye doctor only after vision loss is already severe. Routine screenings, especially for:

- Adults above 40

- People living with diabetes

- School-going children

Accessing vision care is not complicated. Availability is a major factor. Vision care must also be affordable to be accessible; currently, affordability is at the bottom of the list of priorities.

Examples of initiatives that have been implemented include subsidized cataract surgeries, free glasses for school children, free glasses for senior citizens, and community insurance models for eye care. All of these have been successful with valid results, and there’s plenty of evidence available that supports all these types of programs.

India can solve this. It has the necessary eye surgeon specialists, the model of care, and the evidence needed to make this happen. The issue preventing more people from receiving care, preventing blindness, which could be avoided, has always been a lack of awareness or attention to the problem to turn a statistic into an urgent need. At some point, we need to stop asking why this is happening and start asking why we will allow it to keep happening.