Image Credit: Health and me
Pregnancy is accompanied by a lengthy list of do's and don'ts—take prenatal vitamins, no alcohol, exercise carefully, and eat well. But what about when an unplanned health issue presents itself, such as the necessity for a mammogram? For most women, this might not even be something they think about until they are in a position where breast cancer screening is an option.
Perhaps you're over 40 and in need of your yearly mammogram, or perhaps you have a history of breast cancer in your family and you want to keep your screenings current. More emergently, you've found a lump in your breast. So, can you have a mammogram when pregnant? The answer is yes, but there are several things to consider.
Pregnancy creates substantial hormonal changes that affect the body, as well as breast tissue. Estrogen and progesterone's rise causes the breasts to expand and condition to produce milk, which results in denser tissue. This increased density is more challenging to detect any abnormalities with using mammograms. Even post-delivery, should the woman be breastfeeding, milk-filled glands can also make the breasts denser and, as a result, make mammogram readings less clear.
While 3D mammograms have improved imaging technology to help navigate dense breast tissue, doctors often suggest postponing routine screening mammograms until after pregnancy if there are no symptoms or high-risk factors. However, if a lump or abnormality is found, your doctor may recommend immediate diagnostic imaging.
Mammograms are not done routinely if a woman becomes pregnant, yet there are specific situations where one might be unavoidable. Breast cancer in pregnancy does occur—1 in 3,000 times—but it's not common. If a lump is detected by a woman, she has constant breast pain and no explanation, or she is at high risk (e.g., strong history of breast cancer in her family or genetic defect such as BRCA1 or BRCA2), a physician will order a mammogram.
The process itself takes very little radiation exposure. The radiation employed by a mammogram is concentrated on the breast, and there is little to no radiation that reaches other areas of the body. A lead apron is also placed over the belly to shield the unborn child.
For pregnant women requiring breast imaging, physicians may initially suggest an ultrasound. In contrast to a mammogram, an ultrasound is not done with the use of radiation and is deemed safe for pregnant women.
An ultrasound of the breast can establish whether a lump is a fluid-filled cyst or a solid tumor that needs further investigation. Yet ultrasounds are not always diagnostic, and in certain instances, a mammogram or biopsy is needed to determine or rule out cancer.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is also an imaging choice but has some drawbacks. The majority of breast MRIs employ a contrast material called gadolinium, which is able to pass through the placenta and to the fetus. Although risks are not entirely clear, physicians usually do not use MRI with contrast unless necessary. Some practitioners may offer an MRI without contrast as an option.
Breast changes throughout pregnancy are normal, but finding a lump should never be taken lightly. If you notice a lump, alert your medical provider right away. They will conduct a clinical breast exam and potentially have you get an imaging study such as an ultrasound or mammogram to see whether anything needs to be done.
If imaging indicates a suspicious mass, a biopsy can be suggested. Core needle biopsy is the most frequently used and is safe during pregnancy. It consists of numbing the skin with local anesthetic and inserting a hollow needle into the area to obtain a small sample of tissue to be tested.
In the extremely uncommon event of a diagnosis of breast cancer while pregnant, therapy will be determined by the nature and extent of cancer and by how far along in pregnancy one is. The most frequent form of treatment is surgery—either mastectomy (surgical removal of the entire breast) or lumpectomy (surgical removal of the lump)—which is usually safe while pregnant.
Chemotherapy is also possible but usually only attempted after the first trimester, when it can damage developing fetal tissue. Radiation therapy is not used during pregnancy and is typically deferred until after giving birth. Hormonal therapy and targeted therapies are also omitted until after giving birth.
Yes, you can have a mammogram while you are breastfeeding. The radiation in a mammogram does not impact breast milk or hurt the baby. But breast density is still high during lactation, and this might complicate detection of abnormalities. To enhance image quality, physicians usually advise breastfeeding or pumping 30 minutes prior to the mammogram.
Routine screening mammograms are usually delayed in pregnancy unless there is a high-level concern.
If a lump is detected, an ultrasound is typically the initial imaging study done, with a mammogram being a consideration if additional assessment is necessary.
If breast cancer does develop during pregnancy, there are available treatment options that can be adjusted to keep the mother and infant safe.
Pregnancy is a period of significant change, and health issues particularly those involving breast health, are anxiety-provoking. Routine mammograms are typically postponed until after giving birth, but diagnostic testing can be done if necessary. The best you can do is discuss changes you notice in your breasts with your healthcare provider in an open manner. Early detection and prompt treatment can make a very big difference in the health of both mother and fetus.
Credit: iStock
Down Syndrome is a common genetic disorder in which an extra copy of chromosome 21 (Trisomy 21) causes mild-to-moderate intellectual disabilities, developmental delays, and characteristic physical traits.
Every year, World Down Syndrome Day is observed on March 21 every year to raise public awareness about the condition, which deserves more than medical care.
The theme for World Down Syndrome Day 2026 is 'Together Against Loneliness,’ and it focuses on raising awareness of how loneliness disproportionately affects people with Down syndrome and other intellectual disabilities, as well as their families.
According to the UN data, the estimated incidence of Down syndrome is between 1 in 1,000 -- 1 in 1,100 live births worldwide. Each year, approximately 3,000 to 5,000 children are born with this chromosome disorder.
In India, about 30,000 babies are born with Down syndrome every year.
While Down Syndrome is not preventable, in a video post on the social media platform X, Dr. Neerja Gupta from AIIMS Delhi highlighted the importance of early detection, screening, and long-term support for better outcomes.
Dr. Gupta, Professor, Division of Genetics at AIIMS's Department of Pediatrics, also explained the causes of the condition and shared tests that can help eliminate the risks in future babies.
“Down syndrome is a common chromosomal disorder in which chromosome 21 is present in three copies instead of two. Normally, every human cell has 46 chromosomes. However, in Down syndrome, there are 47 chromosomes because the 21st chromosome is present in three copies instead of two,” she said.
Due to the increase in the number of chromosomes, the child may:
"The sooner we can catch them, the earlier we can begin the intervention, resulting in better health outcomes," Dr Gupta said.
Down syndrome can occur in three types, depending on how the extra copy of chromosome 21 is present. In all cases, chromosome 21 appears in three copies, but this can happen in different ways.
"As the mother’s age increases, the risk of Down syndrome also increases. Today, there are several prenatal tests available to detect this condition during pregnancy," the expert said.
"In this, the DNA is seen in the fetal baby's stomach through the mother's blood, to check whether the chromosomal copies are in the right number or not," she said.
The expert noted that this screening test is highly accurate, but if the results indicate a high risk, diagnostic testing of the fetus is recommended.
Credit: Canva
Cosmetic treatments are no longer rare or exclusive. A quick search online reveals hundreds of options promising smoother skin, sharper features, or younger-looking results. Walk through any city, and you’ll find salons and aesthetic studios advertising fillers, lasers, chemical peels, and anti-ageing injections. On the surface, it all looks routine. But for many doctors, this growing trend has also raised an uncomfortable question: who is actually performing these procedures?
The skin is considered a cosmetic surface that can be polished or fixed quickly. In reality, skin is the largest organ of the body and is closely related to other deeper structures like the blood vessels, nerves, and muscles. Procedures that alter or inject into these layers require medical knowledge and technical training.
When carried out by individuals without proper qualifications, even treatments marketed as “simple” can turn risky.
In recent years, cosmetic procedures have moved far beyond hospitals and specialised clinics. Many services are now offered in beauty salons or small aesthetic centres that operate with very little medical know-how.
The treatments themselves may sound harmless: lip fillers, Botox injections, laser resurfacing, or skin tightening.
Unfortunately, the procedures done are not merely surface-level. For example, injectables are not something done without considering the underlying structures and related anatomy. A small error or poor technique can result in uneven, unbalanced results, or prolonged swelling or more serious complications such as blocked blood vessels.
Laser treatments also require expertise. Different skin types react differently to energy-based devices. Incorrect settings can result in burns, pigmentation changes, or scarring that may take months to correct.
Qualified dermatologists and plastic surgeons approach cosmetic procedures with a very different mindset. The process rarely begins with the treatment itself. It begins with evaluation.
A trained specialist looks at the patient’s medical history, skin condition, lifestyle habits, and expectations before recommending any intervention. Sometimes the safest recommendation is to delay a procedure or choose a less aggressive approach.
Patients should also take a moment to verify the doctor's qualifications to perform the procedure. A qualified plastic surgeon typically holds an MCh or DNB degree in plastic surgery, whereas a dermatologist holds an MD or DNB in Dermatology. The risks of choosing a provider on the basis of cost or accessibility can expose patients to unnecessary risks.
Medical training also prepares specialists to recognise complications early and manage them effectively. Even well-performed procedures can occasionally cause reactions. The difference lies in how quickly those issues are identified and treated.
Lower prices and easy accessibility often attract people toward unregulated services. What many do not realise is that fixing a poorly performed cosmetic procedure can be far more complex than the original treatment.
Corrective procedures may involve dissolving fillers, repairing damaged skin, or undergoing additional medical care to restore normal appearance. Apart from the financial cost, these situations can also affect confidence and emotional well-being.
Cosmetic procedures can be safe and effective when performed by trained medical professionals. Patients should feel comfortable asking about qualifications, experience, and the type of equipment being used. A responsible practitioner will always prioritise safety, proper consultation, and realistic expectations.
Aesthetic treatments may focus on appearance, but the responsibility behind them is medical. Your skin deserves expertise, careful judgement, and the assurance that every step is taken with your health in mind.
An estimated 4.9 million children died before reaching their fifth birthday in 2024, including 2.3 million newborns, according to the latest United Nations report on global child mortality. The findings were released in the report Levels and Trends in Child Mortality, which examines the leading causes of deaths among children worldwide.
The report notes that many of these deaths could have been prevented through simple and affordable health measures. Access to quality healthcare, timely treatment, vaccination, and better nutrition remain key factors in reducing child deaths.
Over the past two decades, the world has made significant progress. Global under five deaths have dropped by more than half since 2000. However, the pace of improvement has slowed in recent years. Since 2015, the rate of decline in child mortality has fallen by more than 60 percent, raising concerns among health experts.
Despite global challenges, India has made notable progress in improving child survival rates through sustained public health efforts.
According to the United Nations Inter Agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (UNIGME) Report 2025, India has steadily reduced deaths among newborns and young children over the past decades. The Union Health Ministry said the country has played an important role in lowering child mortality across South Asia.
India’s Neonatal Mortality Rate, which measures deaths within the first 28 days of life, has seen a major decline. In 1990, the rate stood at 57 deaths per 1,000 live births. By 2024, it had dropped to 17.
A similar trend was seen in the Under Five Mortality Rate. In 1990, India recorded 127 deaths per 1,000 live births among children under five. By 2024, that number had fallen sharply to 27.
Health officials attribute this progress to targeted public health programmes, improved hospital deliveries, and wider vaccination coverage.
The report highlights that several preventable health conditions continue to drive child deaths across the world.
For the first time, the report estimated deaths directly caused by severe acute malnutrition. It found that more than 100,000 children aged between one month and five years died due to severe malnutrition in 2024.
Experts believe the real impact may be even higher because malnutrition often weakens the immune system. This makes children more vulnerable to common infections such as pneumonia, diarrhea, and malaria, which can become life threatening.
Some countries reporting high numbers of malnutrition related deaths include Pakistan, Somalia, and Sudan.
Nearly half of all deaths among children under five occur during the newborn stage. This reflects slower progress in preventing deaths around the time of birth.
The leading causes of newborn deaths include complications related to premature birth, which account for about 36 percent of cases. Problems during labor and delivery contribute to around 21 percent of deaths.
Other important causes include infections such as neonatal sepsis and certain birth defects.
After the first month of life, infectious diseases remain the main threats to children’s survival. Malaria, diarrhea, and pneumonia are among the biggest causes of death.
The report also points out that global funding for maternal and child health programmes is facing increasing pressure. This could slow progress in reducing child deaths in the coming years.
Experts stress that investing in child health remains one of the most effective public health strategies. Basic interventions such as vaccination, treatment for severe malnutrition, and skilled care during childbirth can save millions of lives.
According to the report, such measures not only improve health outcomes but also strengthen economies by creating healthier and more productive populations.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited