Pregnancy is accompanied by a lengthy list of do's and don'ts—take prenatal vitamins, no alcohol, exercise carefully, and eat well. But what about when an unplanned health issue presents itself, such as the necessity for a mammogram? For most women, this might not even be something they think about until they are in a position where breast cancer screening is an option.

Perhaps you're over 40 and in need of your yearly mammogram, or perhaps you have a history of breast cancer in your family and you want to keep your screenings current. More emergently, you've found a lump in your breast. So, can you have a mammogram when pregnant? The answer is yes, but there are several things to consider.

Pregnancy creates substantial hormonal changes that affect the body, as well as breast tissue. Estrogen and progesterone's rise causes the breasts to expand and condition to produce milk, which results in denser tissue. This increased density is more challenging to detect any abnormalities with using mammograms. Even post-delivery, should the woman be breastfeeding, milk-filled glands can also make the breasts denser and, as a result, make mammogram readings less clear.

While 3D mammograms have improved imaging technology to help navigate dense breast tissue, doctors often suggest postponing routine screening mammograms until after pregnancy if there are no symptoms or high-risk factors. However, if a lump or abnormality is found, your doctor may recommend immediate diagnostic imaging.

When Is a Mammogram Necessary During Pregnancy?

Mammograms are not done routinely if a woman becomes pregnant, yet there are specific situations where one might be unavoidable. Breast cancer in pregnancy does occur—1 in 3,000 times—but it's not common. If a lump is detected by a woman, she has constant breast pain and no explanation, or she is at high risk (e.g., strong history of breast cancer in her family or genetic defect such as BRCA1 or BRCA2), a physician will order a mammogram.

The process itself takes very little radiation exposure. The radiation employed by a mammogram is concentrated on the breast, and there is little to no radiation that reaches other areas of the body. A lead apron is also placed over the belly to shield the unborn child.

Alternative Breast Imaging Options During Pregnancy

For pregnant women requiring breast imaging, physicians may initially suggest an ultrasound. In contrast to a mammogram, an ultrasound is not done with the use of radiation and is deemed safe for pregnant women.

An ultrasound of the breast can establish whether a lump is a fluid-filled cyst or a solid tumor that needs further investigation. Yet ultrasounds are not always diagnostic, and in certain instances, a mammogram or biopsy is needed to determine or rule out cancer.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is also an imaging choice but has some drawbacks. The majority of breast MRIs employ a contrast material called gadolinium, which is able to pass through the placenta and to the fetus. Although risks are not entirely clear, physicians usually do not use MRI with contrast unless necessary. Some practitioners may offer an MRI without contrast as an option.

What If You Find a Lump In Your Breast During Pregnancy?

Breast changes throughout pregnancy are normal, but finding a lump should never be taken lightly. If you notice a lump, alert your medical provider right away. They will conduct a clinical breast exam and potentially have you get an imaging study such as an ultrasound or mammogram to see whether anything needs to be done.

If imaging indicates a suspicious mass, a biopsy can be suggested. Core needle biopsy is the most frequently used and is safe during pregnancy. It consists of numbing the skin with local anesthetic and inserting a hollow needle into the area to obtain a small sample of tissue to be tested.

Breast Cancer Treatment During Pregnancy

In the extremely uncommon event of a diagnosis of breast cancer while pregnant, therapy will be determined by the nature and extent of cancer and by how far along in pregnancy one is. The most frequent form of treatment is surgery—either mastectomy (surgical removal of the entire breast) or lumpectomy (surgical removal of the lump)—which is usually safe while pregnant.

Chemotherapy is also possible but usually only attempted after the first trimester, when it can damage developing fetal tissue. Radiation therapy is not used during pregnancy and is typically deferred until after giving birth. Hormonal therapy and targeted therapies are also omitted until after giving birth.

Can I Get a Mammogram While Breastfeeding?

Yes, you can have a mammogram while you are breastfeeding. The radiation in a mammogram does not impact breast milk or hurt the baby. But breast density is still high during lactation, and this might complicate detection of abnormalities. To enhance image quality, physicians usually advise breastfeeding or pumping 30 minutes prior to the mammogram.

Routine screening mammograms are usually delayed in pregnancy unless there is a high-level concern.

If a lump is detected, an ultrasound is typically the initial imaging study done, with a mammogram being a consideration if additional assessment is necessary.

• Pregnancy mammograms utilize minimal radiation and are safe when required.
• Breast MRI with contrast is usually avoided in pregnancy.
• Breast biopsy, when necessary, is safe during pregnancy.

If breast cancer does develop during pregnancy, there are available treatment options that can be adjusted to keep the mother and infant safe.

Pregnancy is a period of significant change, and health issues particularly those involving breast health, are anxiety-provoking. Routine mammograms are typically postponed until after giving birth, but diagnostic testing can be done if necessary. The best you can do is discuss changes you notice in your breasts with your healthcare provider in an open manner. Early detection and prompt treatment can make a very big difference in the health of both mother and fetus.

Lung cancer has long been associated with smoking, but this is no longer the complete picture. While tobacco remains the leading cause, an increasing number of people who have never smoked are also being diagnosed with the disease. This changing pattern highlights the need to look beyond smoking alone when considering lung cancer risk.

In non-smokers, lung cancer is often diagnosed later because neither patients nor families may initially suspect the disease. As a result, symptoms are sometimes mistaken for common respiratory illnesses, delaying evaluation and treatment.

Why Non-Smokers Are Also at Risk

While smoking continues to account for most lung cancer cases, several other factors can also contribute. Long-term exposure to second-hand smoke, air pollution, radon gas, asbestos, diesel exhaust, and certain workplace chemicals has been linked to an increased risk. A family history of lung cancer or specific genetic mutations may also make some individuals more susceptible, even if they have never used tobacco.

In urban areas, prolonged exposure to polluted air is becoming an important concern. Fine particulate matter can enter deep into the lungs, causing long-term inflammation and damage that may increase the risk of developing lung disease, including cancer.

Symptoms That Should Not Be Ignored

Early lung cancer may not cause noticeable symptoms. When symptoms do appear, they should not be ignored, particularly if they persist for more than a few weeks. Symptoms that should be evaluated by a doctor include:

• A persistent cough that does not improve

• Coughing up blood

• Chest pain

• Shortness of breath

• Unexplained weight loss

• Repeated chest infections

• Hoarseness of voice

• Persistent fatigue

These symptoms can occur due to several conditions and do not always indicate lung cancer. However, persistent or worsening symptoms should be assessed promptly to identify the underlying cause and begin appropriate treatment if needed.

Why Early Diagnosis Makes a Difference

Finding lung cancer at an early stage improves the chances of successful treatment. Individuals with prolonged exposure to environmental or occupational risk factors, or those with a strong family history of lung cancer, should discuss their risk with a doctor. Imaging tests such as chest CT scans and, when indicated, molecular testing help identify the type of lung cancer and support treatment planning.

Looking Beyond Smoking

Not every case of lung cancer can be prevented, but reducing exposure to tobacco smoke, avoiding harmful occupational exposures, improving indoor air quality where possible, and seeking medical advice for persistent respiratory symptoms can help protect lung health. Greater awareness that lung cancer can affect both smokers and non-smokers may lead to earlier diagnosis, timely treatment, and better outcomes.

(Dr Dipanjan Panda, Senior Consultant, Medical Oncology, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, Delhi)

Influenza strain H1N1, formerly known as swine flu, is rising significantly in India, with deaths also being reported in some states.

H1N1 is a subtype of Influenza A and can cause sudden fever, cough, sore throat, headache, body aches and fatigue. These symptoms can overlap with those of other seasonal influenza strains, COVID-19 and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), making it difficult to identify the infection based on symptoms alone.

H1N1 Cases and Deaths Reported in States

Delhi: According to official data, Delhi has reported 1,349 confirmed H1N1 infections. No official deaths have been reported.

Kerala: A total of 2,468 influenza cases were recorded in the state in July, with 24 deaths reported during the month. The total number of cases recorded in the state this year stands at 5,519, with 60 deaths reported.

Maharashtra: The state has reported 25 laboratory-confirmed H1N1 cases, including a major spike of 15 cases in July. One confirmed death was officially verified by the Nagpur Municipal Corporation (NMC) Death Audit Committee.

Gujarat: H1N1 activity is also being reported, with Ahmedabad currently seeing a rise in cases.

Although H1N1 influenza primarily affects the respiratory tract, the infection can also put additional strain on the heart in some people, particularly those with a chronic history of cardiovascular disease, experts told HealthandMe.

How H1N1 Can Strain the Heart

Fever, dehydration, increased levels of carbon dioxide in the body, decreased oxygen levels and the body’s inflammatory response can increase the workload on the heart during an H1N1 infection.

This added strain may be more concerning for people who already have cardiovascular disease, said Dr. Praveen Raman Mishra, Associate Consultant, Institute of Cardiac Sciences at ShardaCare – Healthcity.

Heart Problems Linked to H1N1

Some H1N1 influenza patients may experience cardiovascular complications, including:

• Inflammation of the heart
• Abnormal heartbeats
• Worsening of heart failure

Dr. Saurabh Gupta, Associate Director, Internal Medicine, Yashoda Medicity, added that H1N1 infection may cause fluctuations in heart rhythm or inflammation associated with the heart.

“In some circumstances when suffering from the H1N1 virus, although the initial symptoms of the virus may be those shared with the normal flu, such as temperature, aches and cough, those with pre-existing heart conditions should be more vigilant whilst they’re recuperating,” he told HealthandMe.

“As the infection puts more work on the body, you can find that previous heart problems are more noticeable,” he added.

Warning Signs to Watch For After H1N1

The experts noted that people recovering from H1N1 should seek medical attention if they develop symptoms such as:

• Severe chest pain
• Shortness of breath
• A high or fluttering pulse
• Sudden faintness
• Severe weakness

Who Should Be Particularly Careful?

People with a chronic history of cardiovascular disease may face greater strain on the heart during H1N1 infection.

Monitoring symptoms during recovery and seeking medical attention when concerning symptoms develop can help identify cardiovascular problems early.

For many women, menopause can bring a string of uncomfortable symptoms like hot flashes, sleep problems, changing body composition and weight gain.

Now, researchers are looking at whether combining GLP-1-based weight-loss medicines with menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) could offer greater benefits, particularly for women struggling with obesity after menopause.

A recent Mayo Clinic study, published in The Lancet Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Women's Health, found that postmenopausal women taking tirzepatide along with hormone therapy lost about 35% more weight than those taking tirzepatide alone.

What Are The Study's Findings?

Researchers studied 120 postmenopausal women with overweight or obesity who had been taking tirzepatide for at least 12 months. Forty women were also using MHT, while 80 were not.

Women taking both treatments lost around 17-19% of their body weight, compared with about 14% among those taking tirzepatide alone. About 45% of women on the combination achieved at least 20% weight loss, compared with 18% in the tirzepatide-only group.

“This study provides important insights for developing more effective and personalized strategies for managing cardiometabolic risk in postmenopausal women,” said Dr Regina Castaneda, first author and Mayo Clinic researcher.

However, this was just an observation in the study, not a randomized clinical trial. Therefore, it cannot prove that hormone therapy itself caused the additional weight loss.

“It is possible that women using hormone therapy were already engaged in healthier behaviors, or that menopause symptom relief improved sleep and quality of life,” said Dr Maria Daniela Hurtado Andrade, senior author of the study.

Also read: Postmenopausal Women May Face More Severe Dry Eye Disease; How Do Hormones Contribute?

Could The Combination Work?

During menopause, declining oestrogen levels can change fat distribution, appetite, metabolism and muscle mass. GLP-1 medicines, meanwhile, reduce appetite and slow stomach emptying, helping with weight management.

Researchers believe there could also be a biological interaction between oestrogen and GLP-1 signalling. “Preclinical data suggest a potential synergy, with estrogen appearing to enhance the appetite-suppressing effects of GLP-1,” Castaneda said.

Earlier research has also suggested greater weight loss among postmenopausal women using semaglutide alongside hormone therapy.

A 2026 review similarly concluded that GLP-1 medicines may help reduce weight and abdominal fat in menopausal women, but larger studies are needed.

Also read: Experimental Menopause Drug Shows Promise Mid-Stage Trial, Reduces Hot Flashes By 83%

Are There Any Side Effects Of Combining These Drugs?

GLP-1 medicines may cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, constipation, abdominal pain and reduced appetite. These effects often surface when the dose is increased.

Hormone therapy has its own side-effects and it is also not suitable for everyone. Depending on the patient's medical history, MHT can increase the risk of complications like blood clots and stroke.

Hormone therapy should not be started simply to fuel weight loss from a GLP-1 drug. It is primarily used to treat certain menopause symptoms and should be prescribed after considering a woman's age, symptoms, medical history and individual risks.

As Hurtado Andrade noted, researchers now want to determine whether the combination offers benefits beyond weight loss, including improvements in cardiometabolic health.