Pregnancy is accompanied by a lengthy list of do's and don'ts—take prenatal vitamins, no alcohol, exercise carefully, and eat well. But what about when an unplanned health issue presents itself, such as the necessity for a mammogram? For most women, this might not even be something they think about until they are in a position where breast cancer screening is an option.

Perhaps you're over 40 and in need of your yearly mammogram, or perhaps you have a history of breast cancer in your family and you want to keep your screenings current. More emergently, you've found a lump in your breast. So, can you have a mammogram when pregnant? The answer is yes, but there are several things to consider.

Pregnancy creates substantial hormonal changes that affect the body, as well as breast tissue. Estrogen and progesterone's rise causes the breasts to expand and condition to produce milk, which results in denser tissue. This increased density is more challenging to detect any abnormalities with using mammograms. Even post-delivery, should the woman be breastfeeding, milk-filled glands can also make the breasts denser and, as a result, make mammogram readings less clear.

While 3D mammograms have improved imaging technology to help navigate dense breast tissue, doctors often suggest postponing routine screening mammograms until after pregnancy if there are no symptoms or high-risk factors. However, if a lump or abnormality is found, your doctor may recommend immediate diagnostic imaging.

When Is a Mammogram Necessary During Pregnancy?

Mammograms are not done routinely if a woman becomes pregnant, yet there are specific situations where one might be unavoidable. Breast cancer in pregnancy does occur—1 in 3,000 times—but it's not common. If a lump is detected by a woman, she has constant breast pain and no explanation, or she is at high risk (e.g., strong history of breast cancer in her family or genetic defect such as BRCA1 or BRCA2), a physician will order a mammogram.

The process itself takes very little radiation exposure. The radiation employed by a mammogram is concentrated on the breast, and there is little to no radiation that reaches other areas of the body. A lead apron is also placed over the belly to shield the unborn child.

Alternative Breast Imaging Options During Pregnancy

For pregnant women requiring breast imaging, physicians may initially suggest an ultrasound. In contrast to a mammogram, an ultrasound is not done with the use of radiation and is deemed safe for pregnant women.

An ultrasound of the breast can establish whether a lump is a fluid-filled cyst or a solid tumor that needs further investigation. Yet ultrasounds are not always diagnostic, and in certain instances, a mammogram or biopsy is needed to determine or rule out cancer.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is also an imaging choice but has some drawbacks. The majority of breast MRIs employ a contrast material called gadolinium, which is able to pass through the placenta and to the fetus. Although risks are not entirely clear, physicians usually do not use MRI with contrast unless necessary. Some practitioners may offer an MRI without contrast as an option.

What If You Find a Lump In Your Breast During Pregnancy?

Breast changes throughout pregnancy are normal, but finding a lump should never be taken lightly. If you notice a lump, alert your medical provider right away. They will conduct a clinical breast exam and potentially have you get an imaging study such as an ultrasound or mammogram to see whether anything needs to be done.

If imaging indicates a suspicious mass, a biopsy can be suggested. Core needle biopsy is the most frequently used and is safe during pregnancy. It consists of numbing the skin with local anesthetic and inserting a hollow needle into the area to obtain a small sample of tissue to be tested.

Breast Cancer Treatment During Pregnancy

In the extremely uncommon event of a diagnosis of breast cancer while pregnant, therapy will be determined by the nature and extent of cancer and by how far along in pregnancy one is. The most frequent form of treatment is surgery—either mastectomy (surgical removal of the entire breast) or lumpectomy (surgical removal of the lump)—which is usually safe while pregnant.

Chemotherapy is also possible but usually only attempted after the first trimester, when it can damage developing fetal tissue. Radiation therapy is not used during pregnancy and is typically deferred until after giving birth. Hormonal therapy and targeted therapies are also omitted until after giving birth.

Can I Get a Mammogram While Breastfeeding?

Yes, you can have a mammogram while you are breastfeeding. The radiation in a mammogram does not impact breast milk or hurt the baby. But breast density is still high during lactation, and this might complicate detection of abnormalities. To enhance image quality, physicians usually advise breastfeeding or pumping 30 minutes prior to the mammogram.

Routine screening mammograms are usually delayed in pregnancy unless there is a high-level concern.

If a lump is detected, an ultrasound is typically the initial imaging study done, with a mammogram being a consideration if additional assessment is necessary.

• Pregnancy mammograms utilize minimal radiation and are safe when required.
• Breast MRI with contrast is usually avoided in pregnancy.
• Breast biopsy, when necessary, is safe during pregnancy.

If breast cancer does develop during pregnancy, there are available treatment options that can be adjusted to keep the mother and infant safe.

Pregnancy is a period of significant change, and health issues particularly those involving breast health, are anxiety-provoking. Routine mammograms are typically postponed until after giving birth, but diagnostic testing can be done if necessary. The best you can do is discuss changes you notice in your breasts with your healthcare provider in an open manner. Early detection and prompt treatment can make a very big difference in the health of both mother and fetus.

Mental health struggles among young children and teens are most likely to get overlooked due to many reasons. That is one of the glaring problems that prompted 16-year-old Imaan Zara Khan to write and direct Unspoken, a movie that follows four teenagers from different social, cultural, and economic backgrounds who navigate their mental health struggles.

Imaan told HealthandMe, "We constantly tell young people to speak up, but what happens when they don’t have the words for what they’re feeling? And even when they do, there’s the fear of being judged, misunderstood or simply not taken seriously. The social visibility cost is simply too high. So, they choose silence instead. I wanted to explore that silence, because sometimes the biggest barrier to seeking help comes long before someone actually asks for it."

The Ministry of Education, Government of India, recently reviewed the draft school mental health policy to foster students' mental wellbeing. The landmark move aims at ensuring adequate resources to protect students' mental well-being by strengthening school systems. Scaling up proven best practices to promote student mental health and psychosocial well-being is one of the primary objectives of the policy.

On World Mental Health Day, we review the government's initiative to comprehend its importance and urgency amid expanding mental health crisis in India's young population.

School Mental Health Policy Aims To Reshape Mental Care For Young Children

Also read: Childhood Fitness Linked To Lower Risk Of Depression In Adulthood: 30-Year Study

The policy entails several key measures to reshape mental healthcare in educational institutions. From identifying early signs of academic stress to proactive screening, it says that schools must routine mental wellness checkups into their academic calendars.

Nandita Bhatla, Vice President and Country Director, WorldBeing India, an international non-profit that works towards integrating mental health wellbeing programs into education systems, told HealthandMe, "India has done well to break the silence. Yet the loss of young lives to suicide tells us that too many children still feel they have nowhere to turn, and that listening cannot wait for a crisis."

She added, "The harder, more important work is making care a routine part of a school day, owned and led by governments, and not dependent on a single programme or a single champion. Schools are the lived reality of millions of our children. When they become spaces to build resilient, hopeful individuals and not mere academic achievers, we know we are on the right path."

The draft also stresses upon building an inclusive and supportive school culture built on a strong foundation of empathy, care, and mutual trust.

The policy also moves away from emergency crisis management. Instead, it aims to create robust, long-term support systems that could help children thrive and stay motivated towards building their future.

Imaan said mental health problems should not be treated as emergencies. She said, "Just as we build physical health through everyday habits, schools should be building emotional resilience, coping skills and mental-health literacy from an early age. But equally important is having a clear, transparent, end-to-end framework that everyone, whether it’s a student, teacher or parent, can understand and navigate."

Also read: Over 2 Hours of Daily Screen Time Linked to Depression, Obesity In Young People: Lancet

Turning Teachers Into Mentors

The policy also focuses on training teachers to be primary mentors for students who could interact with them every day and recognise early signs of conditions like stress, anxiety, and depression. According to the policy, teachers will be trained to identify changes in behaviours and academic burnout.

This does not mean that teachers will replace professional counselors. Additionally, this effort also urges parents to monitor domestic environments.

The policy also plans to channel traditional Indian Knowledge Systems to promote mental wellness among students. It urges schools to integrate mindfulness practices into everyday student activities.

It promotes that these ancient practices can equip students to handle academic pressure, especially during stressful board examinations. The updated curriculum will now support both cognitive growth and development and psychological well-being.

Spending hours sitting at a desk, gaming or binge-watching shows without moving may increase the risk of blood clots, including deep vein thrombosis (DVT), vascular experts have warned.

Prolonged sitting slows blood flow from the legs, potentially increasing the risk of clot formation. Experts from the Vascular Society of India (VSI) highlighted the concern at the VSI-ASVS 2026 Conference, noting that sedentary screen habits warrant attention even among young, otherwise healthy people.

“In our OPD, we are seeing patients where lifestyle history has become an important part of the vascular evaluation. Earlier, when we thought about prolonged immobility, we primarily discussed long-distance travel, hospitalization or being bedridden. Today, we also need to ask young patients how many hours they spend continuously sitting in front of a gaming console, computer or OTT screen,” said Dr. Tarun Grover, Senior Director of Peripheral Vascular and Endovascular Sciences at Medanta.

What Is DVT?

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) occurs when a blood clot forms in a deep vein, usually in the legs. If the clot travels to the lungs, it can cause a potentially life-threatening pulmonary embolism.

Although prolonged immobility has traditionally been associated with long-distance travel, hospitalization and bed rest, experts say extended screen time can also contribute to inactivity.

Gaming and binge-watching do not automatically cause DVT. However, prolonged sitting may add to the risk, particularly in people with obesity, dehydration, smoking habits, hormonal risk factors, inherited clotting disorders or a previous history of thrombosis.

Also read: Richard Branson’s Wife’s Death Highlights Blood Clot Risk After Fractures

What Does Science Say?

A 2024 systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis published in Scientific Reports, covering 25 articles and 31 studies, found that people with the highest levels of sedentary behavior had approximately 24% higher risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) than those with the lowest levels.

The analysis also found a 2% increase in VTE risk for every additional hour of sedentary behavior per day. The association persisted after accounting for physical activity, suggesting that exercise may not fully offset the potential risks of prolonged sitting.

The experts explained that when people sit for hours, their calf muscles—which help pump blood back toward the heart—remain relatively inactive, slowing venous circulation.

A separate study of 11 adolescents with thrombosis found that all reported at least four hours of daily screen exposure, averaging approximately six hours. Eight had DVT in the legs, two had pulmonary embolism and one had subclavian vein thrombosis.

Many also had inherited thrombophilia, a predisposition to blood clots. Researchers noted that prolonged screen-related inactivity may act as an additional trigger rather than the sole cause of thrombosis.

“The evidence showing a 24% higher VTE risk with higher sedentary exposure should make us take this issue seriously. A young age should not create a false sense of security, particularly when prolonged sitting is combined with other risk factors,” Dr. Grover said.

How Can You Reduce The Risk?

Experts recommend taking regular movement breaks during work, gaming and streaming sessions to avoid prolonged uninterrupted sitting.

“Just as smoking increases vascular and clotting risks, prolonged sitting can also increase the risk of blood clots. When a person remains seated for hours, the calf-muscle pump becomes inactive, venous blood flow from the legs slows down and blood can stagnate in the deep veins," said Dr. Bhupesh Garg, Senior Vascular and Endovascular Surgeon, Vascular Society of India.

The message should be simple: if you are going to spend hours on a screen, do not spend those hours completely still, the experts said.

The Black Death swept across Eurasia and North Africa between 1346 and 1353, killing an estimated 30% to 60% of Europe's population.

Plague continued to recur in Europe over subsequent centuries, causing millions of deaths. Caused by Yersinia pestis, the same bacterium responsible for plague today, the Black Death was primarily associated with bubonic plague, although pneumonic plague also occurred.

Bubonic plague typically spreads through infected flea bites, while pneumonic plague affects the lungs and can spread between people through infectious respiratory particles during close contact. All forms can be fatal without prompt treatment, but antibiotics are effective when administered early.

India's 1994 Plague Outbreak

Although often associated with medieval history, plague continues to occur in parts of the world.

In 1994, India experienced an outbreak involving both bubonic and pneumonic plague, following heavy flooding and reports of exposure to dead rats.

“When the plague outbreak happened in India, I was one of the people who investigated it. The outbreak involved bubonic plague, which can be treated with antibiotics, and Surat also saw 64 to 68 cases of pneumonic plague. We identified the plague bacillus and traced its cycle in the surrounding wildlife. Plague surveillance in rats and other animals is essential to detect outbreaks early and take preventive measures,” Dr. N.K. Ganguly, former Director General of the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), told HealthandMe.

There were 693 suspected cases that tested positive for Yersinia pestis antibodies and 56 deaths nationwide.

Surveillance, hygiene and timely treatment were essential to controlling the disease, said Dr. Amitabh Banerjee, an epidemiologist and former member of the Indian Armed Forces’ mobile epidemic investigation team. He investigated the 2002 pneumonic plague outbreak in Himachal Pradesh, which caused 16 cases and four deaths.

Plague Still Exists In Africa And The US

In the US, an average of about seven human plague cases are reported annually, mostly in rural areas of the American West, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

The continued presence of Yersinia pestis in animal populations means the disease has not been eradicated.

“People think the plague is gone, it was something that occurred 500 years ago. It's not. It's here amongst us,” Simon Clarke of the University of Reading in the UK told the Associated Press. “Unless you get rid of those wild animals, which of course is not possible, then you're not going to get rid of the bacteria.”

Russia's Plague Scare: What We Know

Russia has completed checks following the October 2 death of 28-year-old laboratory worker Darya Shipilova in Siberia. Authorities have not confirmed plague as the cause, describing her illness as pneumonia of unknown origin. Nearly 5,000 samples reportedly showed no dangerous pathogens.

Reports of a second death linked to the plague was called "fake news" by Russia, and no plague outbreak has been confirmed in Russia. The WHO and US have requested Russia for more transparency regarding the cases.

Can Plague Be Eradicated?

Plague persists because Yersinia pestis circulates naturally among wild and domestic animals, including rodents, and their fleas. Eliminating human cases in one location does not remove the bacterium from these animal reservoirs.

Dr. Banerjee said plague can be deadly, particularly when it affects the lungs, but modern antibiotics are highly effective when treatment begins early.

“Plague cannot be eradicated because it is in wildlife, it is in rodents and all. So the only thing is hygiene and, with modern antibiotics, there should not be any panic,” he told HealthandMe.

Bubonic plague does not typically spread directly between people, while pneumonic plague can spread through infectious respiratory particles during close contact. Pneumonic plague can progress rapidly and requires urgent treatment.

Dr. Banerjee cautioned against assuming that a suspected case automatically signals a wider outbreak, noting that early diagnosis and appropriate antibiotic treatment are crucial.