Pregnancy is accompanied by a lengthy list of do's and don'ts—take prenatal vitamins, no alcohol, exercise carefully, and eat well. But what about when an unplanned health issue presents itself, such as the necessity for a mammogram? For most women, this might not even be something they think about until they are in a position where breast cancer screening is an option.

Perhaps you're over 40 and in need of your yearly mammogram, or perhaps you have a history of breast cancer in your family and you want to keep your screenings current. More emergently, you've found a lump in your breast. So, can you have a mammogram when pregnant? The answer is yes, but there are several things to consider.

Pregnancy creates substantial hormonal changes that affect the body, as well as breast tissue. Estrogen and progesterone's rise causes the breasts to expand and condition to produce milk, which results in denser tissue. This increased density is more challenging to detect any abnormalities with using mammograms. Even post-delivery, should the woman be breastfeeding, milk-filled glands can also make the breasts denser and, as a result, make mammogram readings less clear.

While 3D mammograms have improved imaging technology to help navigate dense breast tissue, doctors often suggest postponing routine screening mammograms until after pregnancy if there are no symptoms or high-risk factors. However, if a lump or abnormality is found, your doctor may recommend immediate diagnostic imaging.

When Is a Mammogram Necessary During Pregnancy?

Mammograms are not done routinely if a woman becomes pregnant, yet there are specific situations where one might be unavoidable. Breast cancer in pregnancy does occur—1 in 3,000 times—but it's not common. If a lump is detected by a woman, she has constant breast pain and no explanation, or she is at high risk (e.g., strong history of breast cancer in her family or genetic defect such as BRCA1 or BRCA2), a physician will order a mammogram.

The process itself takes very little radiation exposure. The radiation employed by a mammogram is concentrated on the breast, and there is little to no radiation that reaches other areas of the body. A lead apron is also placed over the belly to shield the unborn child.

Alternative Breast Imaging Options During Pregnancy

For pregnant women requiring breast imaging, physicians may initially suggest an ultrasound. In contrast to a mammogram, an ultrasound is not done with the use of radiation and is deemed safe for pregnant women.

An ultrasound of the breast can establish whether a lump is a fluid-filled cyst or a solid tumor that needs further investigation. Yet ultrasounds are not always diagnostic, and in certain instances, a mammogram or biopsy is needed to determine or rule out cancer.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is also an imaging choice but has some drawbacks. The majority of breast MRIs employ a contrast material called gadolinium, which is able to pass through the placenta and to the fetus. Although risks are not entirely clear, physicians usually do not use MRI with contrast unless necessary. Some practitioners may offer an MRI without contrast as an option.

What If You Find a Lump In Your Breast During Pregnancy?

Breast changes throughout pregnancy are normal, but finding a lump should never be taken lightly. If you notice a lump, alert your medical provider right away. They will conduct a clinical breast exam and potentially have you get an imaging study such as an ultrasound or mammogram to see whether anything needs to be done.

If imaging indicates a suspicious mass, a biopsy can be suggested. Core needle biopsy is the most frequently used and is safe during pregnancy. It consists of numbing the skin with local anesthetic and inserting a hollow needle into the area to obtain a small sample of tissue to be tested.

Breast Cancer Treatment During Pregnancy

In the extremely uncommon event of a diagnosis of breast cancer while pregnant, therapy will be determined by the nature and extent of cancer and by how far along in pregnancy one is. The most frequent form of treatment is surgery—either mastectomy (surgical removal of the entire breast) or lumpectomy (surgical removal of the lump)—which is usually safe while pregnant.

Chemotherapy is also possible but usually only attempted after the first trimester, when it can damage developing fetal tissue. Radiation therapy is not used during pregnancy and is typically deferred until after giving birth. Hormonal therapy and targeted therapies are also omitted until after giving birth.

Can I Get a Mammogram While Breastfeeding?

Yes, you can have a mammogram while you are breastfeeding. The radiation in a mammogram does not impact breast milk or hurt the baby. But breast density is still high during lactation, and this might complicate detection of abnormalities. To enhance image quality, physicians usually advise breastfeeding or pumping 30 minutes prior to the mammogram.

Routine screening mammograms are usually delayed in pregnancy unless there is a high-level concern.

If a lump is detected, an ultrasound is typically the initial imaging study done, with a mammogram being a consideration if additional assessment is necessary.

• Pregnancy mammograms utilize minimal radiation and are safe when required.
• Breast MRI with contrast is usually avoided in pregnancy.
• Breast biopsy, when necessary, is safe during pregnancy.

If breast cancer does develop during pregnancy, there are available treatment options that can be adjusted to keep the mother and infant safe.

Pregnancy is a period of significant change, and health issues particularly those involving breast health, are anxiety-provoking. Routine mammograms are typically postponed until after giving birth, but diagnostic testing can be done if necessary. The best you can do is discuss changes you notice in your breasts with your healthcare provider in an open manner. Early detection and prompt treatment can make a very big difference in the health of both mother and fetus.

Higher temperatures in the US could increase heat-related heart disease by 200 per cent by 2050, according to an alarming study.

The research, published in JAMA Cardiology, predicts rising temperatures driven by climate change will dramatically increase heat-related heart disease in the US.

It is already known that extreme heat is detrimental to heart health and can potentially trigger heart attacks and other cardiovascular events.

"But this study is the first to map out exactly how bad the problem could get—county by county, across the US. It also highlighted how states with lower median household incomes are likely to face higher heat-related heart disease burden," said Gokul Parameswaran, research associate at the Case Western Reserve School of Medicine's Cardiovascular Research Institute and the study's lead author.

Regional Hot Spots

Researchers analyzed heart disease data in each county in the contiguous US from 2010 to 2016 to develop projections through 2050.

They found that the Pacific Northwest has the highest heat-related heart disease rate in the country. Southern states, however, are projected to see the steepest increases by 2050.

"Climate change is not just an environmental issue—it is a health equity crisis, and prioritizing vulnerable communities must be at the center of any heat mitigation strategy," said Salil Deo, associate professor in the Department of Surgery.

Also read: Global Temperatures Likely To Stay Near Record Levels For Next Five Years: WMO

The study also found that aging — independent of temperature increases — will contribute an additional 34 per cent increase in heat-related heart disease by 2050, simply because there will be more older adults by then.

Heat Events In The US

The study comes amidst more frequent heat events in the US, which is also lasting longer, and the temperatures during heat events are going up.

The past 10 years, from 2015 to 2024, were the hottest on record globally. But in cities across the United States, the average rate of extreme heat events increased from two per year in the 1960s to 10 per year between 2010 and 2020, according to Center for Climate and Energy Solutions (C2ES), a Washington-based NGO.

Also Read:‘Heat Dome’ Triggering Record-Breaking May Temperatures In France, UK, Spain

Additionally, as of 2024, the average length of heat-wave season in the US has increased by 46 days since the 1960s.

How Does Heat Raise Heart Risks?

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, when temperatures rise, the heart must work harder to keep the body cool, and the likelihood of developing sudden clots in the bloodstream increases.

Read More: Can Extreme Heat Trigger Heart Palpitations? Expert Explains Risks

This extra stress on the heart due to high heat may lead to heart attacks or sudden worsening of heart disease, especially in the elderly or those with prior heart conditions.

How To Tackle The Risk

• Expanding green spaces and tree cover in urban areas could help reduce temperature-related adverse effects.
• Expanding access to cooling centers and air-conditioning assistance programs for low-income communities can also help bridge the gap in underserved communities.

"Climate change is not a distant, abstract threat," said Sanjay Rajagopalan, director of the Cardiovascular Research Institute and chief of Cardiovascular Medicine at University Hospitals Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute.

"It is a present and growing danger to the hearts of every American, and it is coming for the most vulnerable among us first. The choices made today about greenhouse gas emissions, urban planning, and health care policy will determine whether tens of thousands of Americans live or die from heat-related heart disease by 2050," he added.

Diabetes is not only a disorder affecting blood sugar levels, but it also increases the risk of heart disease. People who have diabetes are more prone to get affected by heart attack, stroke, high blood pressure, and blockage of arteries than people without diabetes. Because of this strong link, diabetes care needs a focus on both blood sugar control and heart care.

One of the biggest improvements in diabetes care is the use of GLP-1 receptor agonist therapies. These medications not only help to control sugars but also reduce the risk of heart disease. When a person combines GLP-1 treatment along with a healthy lifestyle, they can improve their overall well-being and lead a good quality of life.

Understanding the Link Between Type 2 Diabetes and Heart Disease

Type 2 diabetes and heart disease are interlinked. Diabetes increases heart disease risk by 2 to 4 times. Over a period of time, when the sugars are chronically high, blood vessels and nerves that support the heart get damaged. Many individuals with diabetes also have additional risk factors, such as:

• Obesity
• High blood pressure
• High cholesterol
• Physical inactivity

These conditions can make a person vulnerable to a heart attack and stroke. Studies show that people with Type 2 diabetes are nearly twice as likely to develop heart disease compared to those without diabetes.

What Are GLP-1 Therapies?

GLP-1 receptor agonists are medications to control high blood sugar in people with type 2 diabetes. These therapies help by:

• Increasing insulin release when blood sugar rises
• Delaying stomach emptying
• Reducing appetite
• Decreasing glucagon production
• Improving weight loss

GLP-1 therapies help control blood sugar. Beyond this, these treatment regimens provide many more benefits. Research shows that these medications can reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events such as heart attack and stroke.

In addition, GLP-1 therapies help in weight reduction. Obesity is also linked to diabetes and heart disease. Hence, GLP-1 therapies help to reduce weight and the risk of developing heart diseases.

Importance of Lifestyle Changes

Medications are important in controlling blood sugars. However, the medication therapies need to be combined with a healthy lifestyle, which can remain the foundation of diabetes and heart disease care.

Healthy Nutrition

A balanced, healthy plate can improve blood sugar, cholesterol, and blood pressure levels. Individuals with diabetes are encouraged to include:

Whole grains

Vegetables and fruits

Lean proteins

Nuts and seeds

Healthy fats

By restricting sugars, processed and ultra-processed foods, extra salt, and unhealthy trans-fats, one can reduce weight and support heart health.

Regular Physical Activity

Regularized physical activity routines help improve insulin sensitivity and strengthen the heart. Activities like walking, cycling, swimming, yoga, and strength training can help reduce the risk of heart disease. Experts generally recommend at least 150 minutes of moderate exercise every week.

Weight Management

Even small amounts of weight loss can improve blood sugar control and reduce stress on the heart. The combination of GLP-1 therapies, healthy lifestyle, controlled eating, and regular exercise gives better long-term results.

Conclusion

Type 2 diabetes and heart disease are closely interlinked, making complete diabetes care essential. GLP-1 therapies are changing diabetes management by offering benefits beyond glycemic control, including heart protection and weight reduction.

However, tablets and medicines alone cannot do all the work. Healthy lifestyle changes, such as balanced nutrition, regular physical activity, and proper weight management, must contribute equally. GLP-1 therapies and lifestyle changes can significantly reduce heart-related risks and improve overall well-being in individuals with Type 2 diabetes.

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurological condition in which the immune system attacks the central nervous system, leading to symptoms such as fatigue, chronic pain, bladder disturbances, gait imbalance, and blurry vision, among others. These symptoms fluctuate, progress over time, become life-limiting, and are not always outwardly visible.

Growing evidence shows that early diagnosis and timely initiation of high-efficacy therapies (HETs) can slow disease progression, reduce relapses, and preserve long-term neurological function. For many individuals living with MS, the struggle goes beyond simply managing their condition. It is also about whether the full impact of the disease is adequately recognized and understood by policymakers, healthcare systems, and the public at large.

Although MS is recognized as a disability under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act, 2016, people living with MS (PwMS) continue to face difficulties accessing disability-related support because their symptoms are not always consistent, visible, or measurable during assessment. This is particularly relevant in a condition like MS, where some of the most disabling symptoms remain invisible.

Living with an Unseen Disability

The effects of MS extend far beyond mobility issues alone. Fatigue, brain fog, memory problems, neuropathic pain, bladder dysfunction, visual disturbances, and emotional strain can significantly hinder a person's ability to work, engage socially, manage responsibilities, and fully participate in everyday activities.

One of the less understood aspects of MS is cognitive impairment, which affects a significant proportion of PwMS. MS causes inflammation in the brain and contributes to brain volume loss, thereby slowing processing speed, affecting concentration, impairing memory, and making planning or multitasking increasingly difficult. Even routine activities such as maintaining conversations, remembering instructions, or completing everyday tasks may become mentally exhausting.

Because many of these symptoms are episodic, variable, or invisible, PwMS may sometimes delay seeking specialist care, while the impact of the disease may also be underestimated by those around them. Yet, MS disease activity can continue even when symptoms appear intermittent or mild.

In MS, treatment decisions regarding the early initiation of the appropriate therapy (platform disease-modifying therapy versus high-efficacy therapy) can meaningfully influence long-term outcomes and quality of life.

Because slowing disease progression often requires highly potent intervention, evaluating a drug’s long-term safety profile becomes just as critical as its efficacy. Certain therapies may carry a risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML)—a rare and potentially fatal viral brain infection that occurs under severe immunosuppression. Therefore, choosing a high-efficacy treatment with a favorable long-term safety profile is paramount.

When Clinical Reality and Functional Recognition Diverge

MS is inherently unpredictable. A person may appear physically stable during one evaluation but experience significant neurological difficulties during a relapse or disease flare-up.

In clinical practice, neurologists evaluate MS through disease progression, relapse patterns, imaging findings, and the EDSS scale (a standardized method used to quantify and measure the level of disability in PwMS).

Looking Ahead

Improving understanding of invisible symptoms in MS is important not only for social awareness but also for enabling patients to access timely care. Greater clarity, consistency, and sensitivity in approaches to chronic neurological conditions can help ensure that PwMS are better supported across healthcare, workplace, and social settings.

Earlier diagnosis, timely intervention, and stronger recognition of the day-to-day realities of living with MS can together help patients preserve dignity, maintain independence, and achieve better long-term outcomes.