Irregular Sleep, Drinking Caffeine After 3PM Could Raise Your Risk Of Heart Attack And Stroke
I’ve always struggled with inconsistent sleep, staying up late and waking up at different times each day. My love for coffee was also on an all-time high with trying all the season specials. But it is only recently, I learned how this irregular sleep pattern and caffeine could increase my risk of heart attack and stroke. Now, I’m prioritizing a consistent sleep schedule and cutting out caffeine after 3 PM to protect my heart.
A new, shocking study shows that irregular sleep patterns can greatly increase the risk of heart attack and stroke. But that's not all: the timing of your caffeine intake could also play a critical role in your cardiovascular health. If you are struggling with inconsistent sleep patterns and regularly sipping on caffeinated beverages late in the day, you may be unknowingly putting yourself at risk for serious heart-related issues.
For most people, sleep is something of a given and we often only consider ourselves as long as we get our required seven to nine hours. However, according to a recent study conducted by researchers at the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, it may not be that long after all. The study, which included more than 72,000 participants, found that people with irregular sleep patterns—those who fall asleep and wake up at vastly different times each day—face a 26% higher risk of experiencing a heart attack or stroke. This increased risk persisted even for those who managed to get enough sleep. The study followed up participants for eight years to track heart events such as heart attacks, strokes, and heart failure. The conclusions were clear: irregular sleep, even if it's sufficient in duration, is a major cardiovascular risk factor.
The researchers found that those whose sleep patterns were highly irregular had a significantly greater chance of life-threatening heart issues. The more erratic your sleep schedule, the greater the risk, regardless of how many hours you sleep. In fact, people with irregular sleep schedules showed worse cardiovascular health outcomes, including higher rates of high blood pressure, elevated stress hormones, and poor blood sugar and cholesterol management.
Senior scientist Dr. Jean-Philippe Chaput said "sleep regularity may be more relevant than sufficient sleep duration in modulating MACE [major adverse cardiovascular event] risk." In the study, it shows that our bodies are comfortable with consistency, and a varied sleep schedule may interfere with other processes that keep us healthy, especially the heart.
Another daily habit that may be putting your heart at risk is caffeine consumption after 3 PM. According to Dr. Chaput, the experts emphasize the need for a healthy sleep schedule and avoiding caffeine late in the day. Caffeine can stay in your blood for up to eight hours, and its consumption later in the afternoon can disrupt your sleep cycle.
Consistent, good-quality sleep is necessary for maintaining healthy cardiovascular function, and the disruption of this by late-day caffeine intake exacerbates the risks posed by irregular sleep. When you drink coffee, tea, or other caffeinated beverages too late, the stimulant effect on your nervous system makes it harder to fall asleep at a regular time. This can lead to inconsistent sleep patterns, which, as we have seen, can be harmful to heart health.
Dr Chaput insists that humans need to adopt practices that contribute to regularized sleep habits. This can be attained by establishing a proper sleeping and waking schedule, eliminating afternoon intake of stimulants such as caffeine, and making your body clock coincide with the lifestyle one leads.
According to the experts, the disturbance due to irregular sleep patterns impacts more than one physiological process involved in the maintenance of the healthy heart. For example, poor sleep can be associated with increased inflammation of the body, weakened immunity, and altered regulation of blood sugar and cholesterol, all of which contribute to increased blood pressure and weakening endothelial function, both associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular diseases. Sleep also plays a very important role in regulating stress hormones. Poor or disturbed sleep results in increased levels of cortisol, the stress hormone, which increases blood pressure and can have negative impacts on cardiovascular health over time.
Scientists hypothesize that these disturbances trigger a series of negative effects that enhance the risk of developing chronic heart conditions, including hypertension, atherosclerosis, or even heart failure.
In order to protect your heart, experts recommend several proactive measures to improve your sleep patterns and lifestyle. First, maintain a regular sleep schedule whereby you go to bed and wake up at the same time every day, including weekends. Consistency will keep your body's internal clock in check.
Along with regulating your sleep, paying attention to your caffeine habits is just as important. To reduce your risk of heart disease and stroke, experts suggest avoiding caffeine after 3 PM. If you’re sensitive to caffeine, this rule becomes even more critical.
In addition, the introduction of stress-reducing activities like yoga or mindfulness can also be beneficial to lower cortisol levels, and therefore both sleep and heart health can improve. A diet rich in antioxidants, healthy fats, and low on processed sugars also helps maintain cholesterol levels and reduce inflammation.
Apart from the timing of caffeine and your sleep schedule, another very overlooked factor is the quality of your sleep environment. Scientists have long known that the environment in which you sleep has a huge impact on the quality of your rest. Poor quality of sleep, even if your sleep schedule is regular, can cause health risks that are very much the same as those that arise from irregular sleep patterns.
Here’s an additional tip: make sure your bedroom is conducive to restful sleep. This means keeping your room dark, quiet, and cool. A temperature of around 65°F (18°C) is ideal for most people. Consider investing in a comfortable mattress and pillows, and avoid screen time at least 30 minutes before bed to allow your brain to unwind.
Irregular sleep, in association with taking caffeine in late parts of the day, can risk heart attack and stroke, but a simple maintenance of a sleep schedule, the reduction of consumption of afternoon caffeine, and sleep environmental awareness can definitely safeguard one's heart along with total health.
Your sleep is more than just a time for rest; it's a vital component of your long-term health, and maintaining consistency in your sleep habits is one of the best things you can do for your heart.
Credit: AI
In my years as an orthopaedic surgeon, I have operated on thousands of joints, ligaments, and bones. And if there is one pattern I have seen repeat itself more consistently than any other, it is this: two patients can undergo the exact same surgery, performed by the same surgeon, using the same technique — and walk away with completely different outcomes. The difference rarely lies in the operating room. It lies in what happens afterwards.
Most patients walk into surgery believing it is the finish line — the hard part, after which everything else is just optional maintenance. Physiotherapy gets treated as something to fit in "if there's time" or "if it still hurts." This is one of the most damaging misconceptions in orthopaedic recovery.
Surgery fixes the structure. It repairs the torn ligament, replaces the worn joint, sets the fractured bone. But it does not, on its own, restore function. That has to be rebuilt — deliberately, gradually, under guidance. And that rebuilding is physiotherapy's job, not the scalpels.
The numbers bear this out. Across orthopaedic procedures, roughly one in five to one in three patients fail to reach their expected functional milestones, and inadequate rehab is consistently among the top reasons why — alongside pre-existing stiffness and delayed rehab starts. A technically flawless surgery, followed by a half-hearted recovery, routinely underperforms a good surgery paired with disciplined rehabilitation.
Three things happen to nearly every post-surgical joint, regardless of how well the operation goes. Muscles begin to atrophy almost immediately — the quadriceps around a knee can lose measurable strength within a week of reduced use, and rest alone does not reverse this. Only progressive, graded loading does, which is exactly what physiotherapy provides.
At the same time, as surgical wounds heal, the body lays down scar tissue. Left unmanaged, this tissue binds to surrounding structures, restricts tendon movement, and quietly steals range of motion — tightening further with time rather than loosening on its own. And joints that aren't moved regularly through their range begin to stiffen as the joint capsule tightens around them.
A joint essentially "learns" its new, restricted range unless someone deliberately and safely pushes it beyond that — which is precisely the judgment call a physiotherapist is trained to make.
Also read: Attention Ladies: More Than 5 Cups Of Coffee Linked To Lower Bone Density; Tea May Help
Healing and recovery are not the same thing. Biological healing — wound closure, bone union, tissue integration — largely happens on its own, on a fixed timeline. But functional recovery — strength, coordination, the confidence to move and bear weight normally — requires the tissue to be used correctly while it heals.
Left alone, the body defaults to protection. It guards the operated area, recruits other muscles to compensate, and avoids the very movements it needs to relearn. Patients typically drift toward one of two extremes: under-loading out of fear, or over-loading out of impatience. Physiotherapy is what calibrates that loading correctly, stage by stage.
There is also a less visible disruption that few patients are aware of — the connection between brain and muscle. Pain, swelling, and immobilisation can cause a structurally intact muscle to simply stop firing efficiently, because the nerve pathways that recruit it have gone quiet from disuse.
Left unaddressed, the body compensates by recruiting other muscles instead — which can look like recovery on the surface while quietly setting up problems in neighbouring joints. This is precisely what targeted neuromuscular re-education in physiotherapy is designed to correct — retraining the brain to activate the right muscle, in the right sequence, again.
The most common reason patients abandon physiotherapy early is what I call the "pain-free equals cured" mentality. Pain typically resolves well before strength, range, and control are fully restored — and once it's gone, patients read that as the finish line. Physiotherapy at that stage feels repetitive and effortful compared to the relief of simply feeling better, so motivation drops exactly when the harder, more important phase of rebuilding begins.
The long-term cost of this is real. In my practice, I regularly see stiffness that never fully resolves, chronic weakness that surfaces years later as instability or a limp, and compensatory strain in neighbouring joints — a hip overworking for an under-rehabbed knee, a shoulder overcompensating for a poorly recovered elbow.
Some of these cases eventually need a second procedure just to release stiffness that consistent physiotherapy could have prevented in the first place. These are not failures of surgery. They are failures of the recovery process that followed it.
Feeling fine and being fully recovered are not the same thing — and that gap is exactly where physiotherapy does its work. Pain is often the first symptom to disappear and the last thing to reflect what's actually happening inside the joint. Strength deficits, altered movement patterns, and residual stiffness can persist long after pain is gone, only to resurface later as instability, re-injury, or early joint wear.
Stopping physiotherapy because the pain has gone is a bit like stopping antibiotics because the fever broke — the underlying process isn't necessarily finished just because the most obvious symptom has resolved.
Surgery and physiotherapy are not two separate stages of treatment. They are two halves of a single continuous process, and the outcome is determined by both. Surgery repairs the structure. Physiotherapy restores the function. Patients who understand this going in don't just heal better — they move better, for years afterwards.
Credit: iStock
GLP-1 drugs are set to become the “new statins of the world” and could transform metabolic health, said Wasim Hanif, Professor of Diabetes and Endocrinology at University Hospital Birmingham.
Speaking exclusively to HealthandMe, Prof Hanif discussed their growing use in obesity and diabetes, potential benefits, side effects and when patients should stop treatment.
Even as the NHS is rolling out GLP-1 drugs, including tirzepatide (Mounjaro), for severe obesity, Prof Hanif said their kidney and cardiovascular benefits could also reduce the healthcare burden.
NICE recommendations cover tirzepatide and semaglutide for obesity and type 2 diabetes, with recommendations also expected for obstructive sleep apnea and MASH.
“I think these drugs will have a huge impact. These are going to be the game changers in metabolic health. These are the new statins of the world,” he said.
The only caveat, according to him, "is the cost, especially in the West".
"The cost of these medications is too high, but the hope is that within the next couple of years, once they become generic, they'll be used even more,” the professor told HealthandMe, on the sidelines of an event organized by the BMJ Group in New Delhi.
The Professor explained that the drugs have evolved beyond GLP-1 alone:
Prof Hanif pointed to growing use in the US and resulting health benefits.
“The total amount that the companies made with the use of these drugs in the United States was 43 billion dollars. Now we are actually seeing, for the first time, the trends of obesity and diabetes coming down,” he said.
He added that cardiovascular benefits are also expected to have a major impact.
Prof Hanif said the drugs are producing major clinical improvements.
“For the first time in years I'm seeing my patients with diabetes achieve normal HbA1c once these drugs are used. Secondly, we are seeing weight losses we never imagined we would be able to get,” he said.
He also highlighted improvements in:
Recent research showed that GLP-1 drugs are showing benefits, even with lower doses. Prof Hanif said dosing depends on the condition and patient.
“For weight loss, yes, you need bigger doses, and that depends upon what your baseline weight is. So if your BMI is 40-45, you probably require a bigger dose, but if your BMI is less, you require a lesser dose,” he explained.
“For diabetes, you don't need the higher doses. With one milligram of semaglutide or five milligrams of tirzepatide, 80% of the patients get the decision,” he said.
“For cardiovascular protection, you don't need big doses. So it really depends upon — it's not that every person will need the topmost dose.”
Do these drugs have side effects? Prof Hanif said yes — but stressed that side effects occur with every medication. However, he pointed out to increasing "medical misinformation about GLP-1 drugs spreading rapidly through social media and websites in the US, Asia and India".
“Between 2007 and 2025, there were 1900 cases of pancreatitis reported or associated with GLP-1, with 19 deaths in the UK. Now how many patients were using these agents? Millions,” said Prof Hanif, who is also part of the board of the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
Comparing this with metformin, he added: “During the same period of time or even less, metformin caused 25 deaths.”
Prof Hanif said side effects associated with GLP-1 drugs do occur, but there are strategies to mitigate them.
“Hair loss is very — it does happen, but it's not that common. Loss of muscle mass happens, but it happens with any kind of weight loss.”
“There are mitigation strategies — how you do it.”
He also highlighted retinopathy, particularly among people with diabetes.
“We know if somebody's having proliferative retinopathy or having laser treatment, you don't use it. There are guidelines on that.”
He also warned against viewing GLP-1 drugs as lifestyle drugs, and buying them online and using them without appropriate medical oversight.
“So these drugs have to be used under medical supervision by people who know how to use these drugs, like any other drugs," Prof Hanif said.
Credit: iStock
Immunotherapy isn’t always better than chemotherapy. Its benefits depend on the cancer type, stage and biomarkers. Similarly, “superfoods” do not cure cancer, health experts said while addressing comedian Rahul Dua’s claims about cancer treatment.
On a recent podcast, Dua opened up about a family member’s four-year cancer battle and his research into alternative treatments.
Dua said his family member began improving after switching from chemotherapy to immunotherapy. He also claimed that low-cost drug combinations, including ivermectin and fenbendazole, could have potential in cancer treatment and questioned whether pharmaceutical profits influence which treatments receive attention.
But what does science say? HealthandMe spoke to oncologist to fact-check these claims and address common cancer-treatment myths.
“Immunotherapy is not universally ‘better’ than chemotherapy. Benefit depends on cancer type, stage, and biomarkers such as PD-L1, MSI-H or TMB,” said Dr Shyam Aggarwal, Chairman, Medical Oncology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital.
“In melanoma, mismatch-repair–deficient tumors and selected lung or kidney cancers, immunotherapy often outperforms or usefully combines with chemotherapy. In many other cancers, chemotherapy remains the backbone,” he added.
Patients should not decide their treatment on their own, the expert told HealthandMe.
Accurate diagnosis, staging and molecular testing require a multidisciplinary team. Shared decision-making with an oncologist is essential, as self-directed treatment choices can delay effective care and cause harm.
Also read: Wegovy & Zepbound Are Not Approved By US FDA For Children Under 12: So Why Are Prescriptions Rising?
Dua also claimed that certain “superfoods” — including a high-protein, high-fat, low-fibre diet — combined with immunotherapy can cure cancer.
“‘Superfoods’ do not treat cancer. A balanced diet supports strength and treatment tolerance, but no food replaces proven therapy. Miracle-food claims lack rigorous evidence,” Dr Shyam said, stressing that patients should consult their oncologist for individualized, evidence-based care.
Dua also spoke about a combination of ivermectin and fenbendazole, describing it as a “₹50 cancer treatment” that he believed could be more effective and questioned whether pharmaceutical profits were a factor.
“But since it was a 50 rupee cure. There is no profit for pharma in that. There is no profit for pharma in that. Off the record, there is this medicine combination of Ivermectin and Fenbendazole. Fenbendazole is a dog dewormer. It costs 20 rupees. Ivermectin is a horse dewormer. I am very convinced that as soon as my auntie moved from (4 years of) chemo to immunotherapy. (She) Started becoming better,” Dua shared during the podcast.
According to the American Cancer Society, ivermectin is not approved to treat cancer in people or animals, and no clinical guidelines recommend it as a cancer treatment.
"Ivermectin has not undergone the rigorous clinical trials needed to establish whether it is safe and effective as a cancer treatment in humans. Available research is insufficient to determine whether it could work as an anticancer drug," it says.
While ivermectin may be used at recommended doses to treat certain worm infections, large doses can be dangerous, potentially causing seizures, coma and even death. It may also worsen the side effects of standard cancer treatments such as chemotherapy.
Dua’s claims has drawn sharp criticism from oncologists, public health specialists and medical communicators, who warned that unscientific “miracle cure” claims could mislead patients into delaying evidence-based treatment.
“Don’t fall for this. A ₹50 cancer ‘cure’ that pharma is hiding is clickbait, not care. These people never follow it themselves and feel no responsibility when patients delay real treatment just so a video can go viral. Lives are not content,” Dr Rishabh Jain, Medical Oncologist, AIIMS Delhi, said on X.
Dr Arshiet Dhamnaskar, neurosurgeon at Western India Institute of Neurosciences, also said people not “trained in medical science should refrain from commenting upon it. As even one bit of misinformation can be disastrous.”
© $2026 Times Horizon Private Limited