Credit: Canva
Fasting may reset your body, but can it reset your mind? The new trend of dopamine fasting claims it can. And wait, there's more. This trend also works against dopamine resistance, implying that things that did not make you happier before will now do. You see, dopamine is a part of the brain's reward system and plays an important role in your pleasure reception. While this neurotransmitter is not directly linked to an individual's happiness, it triggers feelings of satisfaction, motivation and pleasure.
However, a person can also reach a stage of dopamine resistance if they continue to indulge in activities that trigger its frequent or constant release. In this case, the individual stops feeling the impact of this neurotransmitter and thus, does feel good or happy.
So does dopamine fasting work?
Dopamine fasting is a practice where individuals limit their exposure to activities or stimuli that typically provide a surge of dopamine. The idea behind dopamine fasting is to reset or recalibrate the brain's reward system. This is usually done by abstaining from gratifying things or experiences like social media, junk food, and even sex. Proponents of dopamine fasting argue that continual overstimulation from digital devices, social media, and easily accessible indulgences has numbed our brain's reward pathways. By regularly denying ourselves these dopamine triggers, the idea claims, we might restore our ability to acquire fulfilment from life's basic pleasures.
Having low levels of dopamine can make you less motivated and excited about things. In Parkinson's disease, there is not enough dopamine in the areas of the brain important for movement. This leads to problems with muscle stiffness and movements such as walking.
The symptoms of a dopamine imbalance depend on what is causing the problem. They include physical symptoms such as:
Adjusting dopamine levels is complicated, as it is involved in many different roles in the brain. Your doctor won't measure your dopamine levels directly, and there is no simple test to measure it. Your symptoms will be the clues that tell your doctor if you have too much or not enough dopamine. They will then prescribe medicines to adjust your dopamine level, based on your symptoms, and make adjustments based on how your body responds and how you feel.
ALSO READ: Not Just a Screen Time Fix: 5 Timeless Health Habits from the ’50s
Credit: AI Generated Image
For years, diet sodas have enjoyed a pretty good reputation. They offered the sweetness without the sugar, the fizz without the guilt, and for many people, they became an easy replacement for regular soft drinks. It is not hard to see why. Whether it is an afternoon craving, something to sip with lunch, or a way to satisfy a craving without reaching for sugar, diet drinks have quietly become part of many people's daily routine. However, a major new study is making people look at those drinks a little differently. Researchers have found that people who regularly consumed higher amounts of artificial sweeteners showed faster declines in memory and thinking skills over time. It does not mean your occasional Diet Coke is suddenly a problem. But if you cannot remember the last day you went without one, the findings are definitely worth knowing.
The study followed 12,772 adults in Brazil over eight years, with the average age of participants being 52. It is the largest and longest study so far looking at how artificial sweeteners may be linked to brain health. Researchers examined seven commonly used low- and no-calorie sweeteners found in ultra-processed products like sodas, flavoured water, sugar-free yoghurt and low-calorie desserts. These included:
Throughout the study, participants completed tests that measured memory, verbal fluency, and processing speed. After taking other health factors into account, researchers noticed a clear pattern. People who consumed the highest amounts of artificial sweeteners experienced cognitive decline 62% faster than those who consumed the least. According to the researchers, that difference was roughly equal to 1.6 years of additional brain ageing.
Even people in the middle consumption group showed a 35% faster decline, equivalent to about 1.3 years of brain ageing. Out of the seven sweeteners studied, six showed an association with faster cognitive decline. The only one that did not was the Tagatose.
One finding stood out more than the rest. Most people tend to think of memory problems as something that only becomes a concern later in life. This study suggested that may not be the full picture. The link between artificial sweeteners and cognitive decline was strongest in adults under the age of 60. Researchers believe this could mean that the habits people build during midlife play a much bigger role in long-term brain health. The association was also stronger among people with diabetes, who are often more likely to choose artificially sweetened foods and drinks instead of sugary ones. Among all the areas tested, memory appeared to take the biggest hit.
This is where the conversation becomes important.
“Our findings do not suggest that drinking an occasional diet soda is harmful,” Claudia Kimie Suemoto of the University of São Paulo said. “Rather, they raise questions about the potential consequences of frequent, long-term consumption of artificial sweeteners.”
The study was observational, which means it identified the link, but it cannot say for sure that the sweeteners themselves caused the decline. That is a big difference. Lead researcher Claudia Kimie Suemoto from the University of São Paulo said: “Based on our study alone, I would not tell someone to stop drinking diet soda because of concerns about cognitive impairment”.
The findings also support earlier research. A 2017 study from the Framingham Heart Study reported a similar association between artificially sweetened beverages and a higher risk of stroke and dementia. Scientists say the evidence is growing, but there is still more to understand before firm conclusions can be made.
Read Also: UK Woman Dies After Sudden Abdominal Pain Following Increase In Her Mounjaro Dose
The answer is probably not to swear off diet soda forever. Instead, experts suggest taking a closer look at how often you are reaching for it. If one can has quietly turned into several every day, it may be worth cutting back little by little. Whenever you want a Diet Coke, go for plain water, sparkling water, unsweetened tea, or black coffee. This can help reduce your overall intake without making the change feel overwhelming. The goal is not perfection; it is balance.
There is no reason to panic over a single can. But if sugar-free drinks have become something you rely on every day without really thinking about it, this study is a good reminder that even habits that seem harmless deserve an occasional second look. Sometimes the healthiest changes start with asking a simple question: "Do I really need another one?"
Credit: iStock
When patients first hear the term "bone marrow transplant," they often picture a complex surgery involving the bones or spine. This is perhaps the most persistent misconception surrounding one of modern medicine's most remarkable achievements.
Unlike other organ transplants (kidney/ heart/ liver, etc), a bone marrow transplant is not a surgery at all! It is administered much like a blood transfusion, through a simple intravenous line. Yet this deceptively simple procedure can rebuild an entire blood-forming and immune system from scratch, offering a genuine cure for blood cancers and other serious blood disorders.
Bone marrow is the body's blood factory, producing the red cells that carry oxygen, the white cells that fight infection, and the platelets that prevent bleeding. At its heart lie blood-forming stem cells or the "parent cells" capable of generating every blood cell the body will ever need.
In leukemia and related cancers, these stem cells turn rogue, crowding out healthy ones. In several inherited disorders, the marrow simply fails to manufacture healthy cells at all. A transplant addresses the problem at its root, replacing defective stem cells with healthy ones.
I often explain this to patients using the language of farming. Before sowing fresh seed, a farmer clears the field of weeds. Similarly, before healthy stem cells can be transplanted, doctors must prepare the marrow through chemotherapy and, in select cases, radiation, a stage called conditioning. Once this was punishingly intensive, limiting transplants to the young and fit. Today, reduced-intensity regimens, which are carefully tailored to suit even the old or frail patients, have extended this option to older adults and those with other health conditions.
The transplant itself is almost anticlimactic in its simplicity: stem cells are infused through an IV, with no incision or operating theatre required. These cells possess a natural ability doctors call "homing": they find their own way into the bone marrow and settle there. Over two to four weeks, they begin producing healthy blood, a process called engraftment.
For decades, the greatest obstacle to transplantation was finding a matched donor. Traditionally, only a fully matched sibling would do, leaving many patients, particularly in a genetically diverse country like India, without options. That has changed decisively. Half-matched family transplants and unrelated donors identified through registries now succeed at rates that rival matched-sibling transplants. Nearly every patient today has a realistic path to a suitable donor.
Technology is reshaping this field further. Gene therapy is opening a new chapter for disorders such as sickle cell disease and thalassemia, correcting a patient's own stem cells in the laboratory rather than relying on a donor, though such therapies remain costly and available only in select countries for now.
Recovery, however, is a marathon, not a sprint. It can take months as the immune system rebuilds, requiring vigilant monitoring for infection and for graft-versus-host disease, in which transplanted immune cells attack the patient's own tissues. Advances in immunosuppressive and targeted therapies have greatly improved our ability to manage this complication, allowing most survivors to gradually return to work, education and family life.
A blood cancer diagnosis remains frightening, but treatment has advanced tremendously in two decades. Bone marrow transplantation is no longer experimental or exceptionally hazardous: it is established, evidence-based, and growing safer and more accessible across India.
Its truest achievement is not simply extending life, but restoring it: another birthday, another child watched growing up, another future reclaimed. For these patients, a transplant is quite literally a chance to begin again.
(Dr. Narendra Agrawal, Hematologist and Bone Marrow Transplant Physician and Senior Consultant and Unit Head of Haemato-Oncology at Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute & Research Centre.)
Credit: iStock
A six-in-one (hexavalent) vaccine could make India's Universal Immunization Program more efficient, convenient for families, and cost-effective if it becomes widely available at an affordable price, according to a study led by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.
The study found that while the hexavalent vaccine has higher upfront procurement costs, it could reduce the number of injections, improve operational efficiency, lower healthcare workload, and save time for caregivers.
The hexavalent vaccine protects children against six diseases with a single injection:
Combining multiple vaccines into one shot reduces the number of injections infants receive during routine immunization visits.
Also read: India Records 20,138 Organ Transplants In 2025; Deceased Donor Transplants Reach 3,526
Researchers found that the vaccine's price is the biggest factor determining the overall cost of introducing it into India's immunization program.
The study estimated that:
The findings were published in the peer-reviewed journal Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics.
According to the study, introducing the hexavalent vaccine could:
Read More: India's National Hepatitis Program Screens Over 210.6 Million, Treats 612,000 Patients
India runs one of the world's largest immunization programs, vaccinating nearly 26 million babies every year.
The program protects children against 12 vaccine-preventable diseases, including:
A team of researchers, including from The George Institute for Global Health India, The Gates Foundation, and Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, assessed two implementation scenarios:
The analysis considered costs from both government and household perspectives, including:
The researchers noted that replacing the current pentavalent, fIPV and DTP booster vaccines with the hexavalent vaccine would initially increase vaccine procurement costs. However, these would be partially offset by savings from:
The team added that based on previous vaccine procurement trends, a 50% reduction in the hexavalent vaccine price would make the switch economically favorable under the primary immunization schedule. Further price reductions could also generate cost savings for the booster-dose scenario.
"Our study demonstrates that although the hexavalent vaccine carries a higher upfront procurement cost, it also generates important efficiencies by reducing injections, easing pressure on frontline health workers, lowering cold-chain requirements and saving caregivers' time. These findings provide important economic evidence that can inform future policy discussions on strengthening India's immunization program," Dr. Susmita said.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited