Microwaves are a common appliance in every household now. You will see it in kitchens of not just houses, but offices, cafeterias, and co working space. However, there are studies that show that heating food in a microwave could be a health concern. While it does come handy, there are questions about harmful radiation and nutrient loss and heating safety that still linger.
Some research suggests that microwaving may cause nutritional loss, particularly in vegetables. For example, studies have shown that microwaving broccoli with water diminishes its flavonoid content, which are anti-inflammatory compounds. However, experts note that cooking method and duration have a significant influence on nutrient retention.
Surprisingly, several studies indicate that microwaving preserves more nutrients than traditional cooking methods. A study comparing microwaved versus oven-cooked ready meals found that the microwaved version contained somewhat more vitamin C. Another study discovered that microwaving some vegetables, such as broccoli and green beans, may retain more beneficial compounds than boiling.
Ultimately, the nutrient loss really vary on the type of food which is being heated and how it is being cooked. Experts also recommend using minimal water and shorter cooking times to maximize the nutrient retention.
Plastic containers and heating food in it, has always been a topic of debate. While containers do come with microwave-safe stamps, is it really safe to heat them with food?
According to research, when certain plastics are subjected to heat, they produce compounds such as phthalates and bisphenol A (BPA). These substances have been associated to hormonal disturbance, metabolic problems, and perhaps reproductive concerns.
A study also took in account over 400 plastic food containers that were microwave-safe and found that most of them leaked hormone-disrupting chemicals. These are phthalates, warn experts, which are commonly used in food packaging and can interfere with body's hormonal balance, and increase risk of diabetes or even high blood pressure.
Additionally, BPA exposure has been associated with fertility issues and immune system disruptions.
To minimize this risk, experts recommend using glass or ceramic container when microwaving foods. If you must use a plastic container, make sure the container is not damaged or old, as they are more prone to leach harmful chemicals.
Concerns about microwave radiation have been largely debunked by decades of research. Microwaves use non-ionizing radiation, which does not have enough energy to damage DNA or cause cancer. The electromagnetic waves used in microwaves are similar to those from radios and light bulbs.
Experts emphasize that microwave ovens are designed to contain radiation, preventing exposure. As long as the microwave is in good condition and the door seals properly, there is no significant health risk from microwave radiation.
Microwaving food could sometimes also lead to uneven cooking and it can create some risks to food safety. Thus, experts advertise to use microwave only to reheat the food and not to actually cook raw food. For safe reheating, food should reach at least 82°C (176°F) throughout to kill bacteria.
Credit: iStock
A stroke can happen suddenly and without warning, making every minute count. The first 60 minutes after the onset of stroke symptoms are crucial because timely medical treatment can help reduce brain damage and improve recovery.
A stroke happens when the blood flow to an area of the brain is cut off due to either the blockage of a blood vessel supplying that area or the bursting of the said blood vessel. Without adequate blood flow, brain cells are deprived of oxygen and nutrients and begin to be damaged within minutes.
The first hour after a stroke is focused on rapid assessment and treatment. Once the patient reaches the hospital, doctors evaluate the symptoms, determine when they started, and perform an urgent brain scan, usually a CT scan, to identify the type of stroke.
This step is important because treatment depends on whether the stroke is caused by a blocked artery (ischemic stroke) or bleeding in the brain (hemorrhagic stroke). For eligible patients with an ischemic stroke, clot-dissolving medication or a procedure to remove the clot may be considered.
Although treatment windows may extend beyond the first hour for some patients, reaching the hospital as early as possible offers the greatest chance of saving brain tissue. In most patients, clot-dissolving medication is given within 4.5 hours of symptom onset, while selected patients may be eligible for treatment up to 9 hours. Mechanical clot removal is generally performed within 6 hours, although carefully selected patients may benefit from the procedure up to 24 hours after symptoms begin. However, earlier treatment is associated with better protection of brain tissue and improved outcomes.
Recognizing stroke symptoms early can help save valuable time. The BEFAST acronym is a simple way to remember the common warning signs:
B – Sudden loss of balance or coordination
E – Sudden vision loss or changes in one or both eyes
F – Face drooping
A – Arm weakness
S – Speech difficulty
T – Time to call emergency medical services
Other symptoms may include sudden loss of vision, dizziness, difficulty walking, numbness on one side of the body, confusion, or a sudden, severe headache.
During a stroke, brain cells continue to be damaged as blood flow remains interrupted. Delays in reaching the hospital can limit treatment options and increase the risk of long-term disability. Seeking medical care as early as possible gives doctors the best chance to provide appropriate treatment.
If you notice stroke symptoms in yourself or someone else, do not ignore them or wait for them to improve. Call emergency medical services immediately and note the time the symptoms first appeared, as this information helps doctors decide the most suitable treatment.
The golden hour is a critical window during which timely action can significantly improve outcomes. Recognizing the signs of stroke and seeking immediate medical care can make a meaningful difference in recovery.
Credit: AI
Massive wildfires have ravaged several parts of Canada and other regions of the world, filling the air with hazardous smoke. This has triggered health warnings far beyond the fire zones.
While most people experience immediate breathing problems during and after wildfires, experts say that some health effects can persist long after the skies clear.
Wildfire smoke is composed of harmful gases and microscopic particles known as PM2.5. These tiny particles are small enough to travel into our lungs and enter the bloodstream, where they can trigger inflammation throughout the body.
Unlike typical air pollution, wildfire smoke also contains toxic substances released from burning homes, plastics, furniture, vehicles, electronics, and industrial materials, making prolonged exposure particularly harmful.
Also read: Delhi's Poor AQI, Monsoon Conditions Put Children's Lungs at Risk: Ways to Keep Kids Safe
Prolonged exposure to wildfire smoke can have long-term effects on the respiratory system. Possible health effects may include:
Children, older adults, and people with existing lung conditions face the highest risk because their lung function is already compromised.
Also read: Phones, Pollution, AI: What Is Driving Cognitive Decline In Humans?
The tiny particles in wildfire smoke don't just stay confined to the lungs. Once they enter the bloodstream, they can affect the cardiovascular system. In the long run, research says wildfire smoke exposure can lead to:
With frequent incidences of wildfires, scientists are looking into how wildfire smoke affects the brain. Emerging evidence suggests smoke exposure may contribute to:
Wildfires can affect mental health in more than one way. Besides the stress of evacuation and property loss, smoke exposure itself may contribute to mental health problems directly. One is at the risk of the following mental health issues after exposure:
Communities repeatedly exposed to wildfire events may experience prolonged psychological distress that could often go undetected.
Growing evidence suggests that long-term exposure to wildfire smoke may increase the risk of several cancers. Studies have reported possible associations with lung cancer, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, bladder cancer, and certain blood cancers
Although researchers say more studies are needed to establish a direct cause-and-effect relationship, the findings highlight the importance of limiting repeated smoke exposure.
Also read: How Air Pollution Puts Heart Patients At Risk - What You Can Do About It
Pregnant women are among the groups considered most vulnerable to wildfire smoke. Research suggests exposure during pregnancy may increase the risk of preterm birth, low birth weight and other pregnancy complications.
Healthcare providers recommend minimizing outdoor exposure whenever air quality deteriorates.
Even after visible smoke disappears, harmful particles may remain in the air. Experts recommend:
Credit: AI
When we think of dialysis, we often picture a machine filtering blood and keeping patients alive. What rarely comes to mind is the small blood vessel in the arm that makes the entire process possible.
For every patient on haemodialysis, the arteriovenous (AV) fistula is quite literally a lifeline. Without it, dialysis cannot be performed effectively. Yet, despite being one of the most important parts of treatment, fistula care remains one of the least understood aspects of kidney disease.
This silent gap in awareness is costing patients their lifeline.
India adds nearly 2.2 lakh new patients with end-stage kidney disease every year, creating a demand for over 3.4 crore dialysis sessions annually.
One of the biggest challenges we see in clinical practice is that patients often seek medical help only after the fistula has already stopped functioning.
The warning signs are usually ignored.
The vibration over the fistula becomes weaker. The arm begins to swell. Bleeding continues longer than usual after dialysis. Needle insertion becomes increasingly difficult. Sometimes dialysis itself becomes less effective.
By the time patients reach an interventional radiologist or vascular specialist, the fistula may already have developed significant narrowing (stenosis) or complete blockage.
Unfortunately, many of these complications are preventable if detected early.
In our experience, nearly 30% of patients eventually lose their fistula because they report too late, when timely intervention could have salvaged access.
Also read: COVID Spikes In India: Experts Allay Fears, Stress Vaccination And Masks
Unlike diabetes or blood pressure, there is no widespread public awareness around fistula surveillance.
Many dialysis patients receive instructions on medicines and dialysis schedules but very little education on how to examine their fistula every day.
There is also no universally implemented patient education protocol across dialysis centres, leading to inconsistent awareness about fistula care.
The result is simple: patients unknowingly damage the very access that keeps them alive.
Patients should examine their fistula daily.
A healthy fistula has a continuous buzzing sensation or “thrill.” If this vibration becomes weak or disappears, medical attention should be sought immediately.
Similarly, swelling of the arm, redness, prolonged bleeding after dialysis, pain around the fistula, or difficulty during needle insertion should never be dismissed as routine.
These are early warning signs - not inconveniences.
Also read: Omicron Sub-Lineages Likely Behind COVID Surge In India: Why Deaths Are Occurring
These small daily habits can often extend the life of a fistula by years.
One of the greatest advances in dialysis access care is that many fistula problems no longer require open surgery.
If narrowing is detected early, minimally invasive image-guided procedures such as fistuloplasty (balloon angioplasty) can restore blood flow, preserve the existing fistula and help patients continue dialysis without interruption.
The key, however, is timing.
A fistula that is evaluated early is often salvageable.
A fistula ignored for weeks may not be.
Every successful fistula represents months of planning, surgery and healing. Losing it means additional procedures, temporary catheters, higher infection risk, increased costs and emotional distress for patients already living with chronic kidney disease.
As doctors, we have become increasingly skilled at creating dialysis access.
The next challenge is ensuring patients know how to protect it.
Because for someone living with kidney failure, the fistula is not just another blood vessel.
It is the lifeline that keeps life moving.
By Dr. Avik Bhattacharyya, Senior Consultant - Interventional Radiology, CK Birla Hospitals, CMRI
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited