Microwaves are a common appliance in every household now. You will see it in kitchens of not just houses, but offices, cafeterias, and co working space. However, there are studies that show that heating food in a microwave could be a health concern. While it does come handy, there are questions about harmful radiation and nutrient loss and heating safety that still linger.

Does Microwave Destroy The Nutrients In Food While Heating?

Some research suggests that microwaving may cause nutritional loss, particularly in vegetables. For example, studies have shown that microwaving broccoli with water diminishes its flavonoid content, which are anti-inflammatory compounds. However, experts note that cooking method and duration have a significant influence on nutrient retention.

Surprisingly, several studies indicate that microwaving preserves more nutrients than traditional cooking methods. A study comparing microwaved versus oven-cooked ready meals found that the microwaved version contained somewhat more vitamin C. Another study discovered that microwaving some vegetables, such as broccoli and green beans, may retain more beneficial compounds than boiling.

Ultimately, the nutrient loss really vary on the type of food which is being heated and how it is being cooked. Experts also recommend using minimal water and shorter cooking times to maximize the nutrient retention.

Is Heating In Plastic Safe?

Plastic containers and heating food in it, has always been a topic of debate. While containers do come with microwave-safe stamps, is it really safe to heat them with food?

According to research, when certain plastics are subjected to heat, they produce compounds such as phthalates and bisphenol A (BPA). These substances have been associated to hormonal disturbance, metabolic problems, and perhaps reproductive concerns.

A study also took in account over 400 plastic food containers that were microwave-safe and found that most of them leaked hormone-disrupting chemicals. These are phthalates, warn experts, which are commonly used in food packaging and can interfere with body's hormonal balance, and increase risk of diabetes or even high blood pressure.

Additionally, BPA exposure has been associated with fertility issues and immune system disruptions.

So, what can be done instead?

To minimize this risk, experts recommend using glass or ceramic container when microwaving foods. If you must use a plastic container, make sure the container is not damaged or old, as they are more prone to leach harmful chemicals.

What About The Radiation?

Concerns about microwave radiation have been largely debunked by decades of research. Microwaves use non-ionizing radiation, which does not have enough energy to damage DNA or cause cancer. The electromagnetic waves used in microwaves are similar to those from radios and light bulbs.

Experts emphasize that microwave ovens are designed to contain radiation, preventing exposure. As long as the microwave is in good condition and the door seals properly, there is no significant health risk from microwave radiation.

Other Concerns

Microwaving food could sometimes also lead to uneven cooking and it can create some risks to food safety. Thus, experts advertise to use microwave only to reheat the food and not to actually cook raw food. For safe reheating, food should reach at least 82°C (176°F) throughout to kill bacteria.

She came to the hospital because of a cough that would not go away. The cough was eventually found to be nothing serious. But her CT scan revealed something unexpected — a 12 mm nodule in the outer part of her right lung.

She had never smoked. She felt completely well.

Yet that tiny shadow raised a big question: was it an old tuberculosis scar, a harmless growth, or an early lung cancer?

A CT scan can show us that a nodule is there. It cannot always tell us what it is.

This is an increasingly familiar situation. As CT scans have become more widely used, particularly after the COVID-19 pandemic, doctors are finding small lung nodules in people being scanned for entirely different reasons. Most turn out to be benign. Some, however, need closer assessment.

India has another challenge. Tuberculosis and its scars are common, and a lung shadow can sometimes be attributed to TB without tissue confirmation. While treating tuberculosis promptly is important, assuming that every suspicious nodule is TB can occasionally delay the diagnosis of something else, including cancer.

The answer, when appropriate, is to obtain a tissue sample.

Traditionally, a small nodule deep in the lung could be difficult to reach. A needle biopsy through the chest can be effective but carries a risk of a collapsed lung. Conventional bronchoscopy is excellent for the larger airways but becomes more challenging as the target gets smaller and farther towards the edge of the lung. Surgery may sometimes be necessary.

Newer techniques are changing the picture.

Navigation bronchoscopy uses the patient's CT scan to create a three-dimensional map of the airways and guide a thin catheter towards the nodule. Cone Beam CT adds real-time three-dimensional imaging during the procedure, allowing the doctor to check where the instruments are in relation to the lesion before taking the biopsy.

In simple terms, navigation helps us find the way; Cone Beam CT helps us confirm we are there.

The tissue can then be examined immediately where appropriate, helping determine whether the sample is adequate and whether additional material is needed for advanced testing.

Importantly, not every nodule needs a biopsy. Many are best managed through carefully planned follow-up scans. The decision depends on the nodule's size and appearance, previous scans, and the patient's overall risk.

For patients, the message is reassuring: a lung nodule does not mean cancer. But it should not be ignored either.

Keep previous scans. Ask what the likely possibilities are. Understand why your doctor recommends surveillance or biopsy — and make sure the follow-up happens.

Today, advanced bronchoscopy is helping doctors turn a worrying shadow into something much more useful: an answer.

(By Dr Shyam Krishnan, Intervention Pulmonologist, CMRI)

Dry cough and breathing difficulty aren’t always caused by asthma, COPD, or infections. They can also be signs of interstitial lung disease (ILD), a group of lung conditions that can cause inflammation and scarring and, in some cases, progressive loss of lung function.

ILD can go unnoticed in its early stages because its symptoms are often mistaken for more common respiratory conditions. By the time a patient undergoes a CT scan and reaches an ILD clinic, significant lung scarring may have already developed — and some of that damage may be irreversible.

Millions May Be Living With ILD Worldwide

A Global Burden of Disease Study 2023 analysis, published in December 2025, estimated that 4.58 million people were living with ILD and pulmonary sarcoidosis worldwide in 2023, with 112,650 deaths attributed to the conditions that year.

“The true global burden of ILD is higher than currently reported, particularly in underserved populations and low- and middle-income countries,” Prof. Marlies Wijsenbeek-Lourens, Pulmonologist and Head of the Center for Interstitial Lung Diseases and Sarcoidosis at Erasmus University Medical Center, Netherlands, told HealthandMe.

The global expert said most available epidemiological data come from Europe, North America, Japan, South Korea and Australia, where access to specialist care, multidisciplinary diagnosis and high-resolution CT imaging is generally more available.

“As a result, large parts of Africa, South America, South and Southeast Asia remain underrepresented in current estimates. In these regions, more limited access to diagnostic facilities, fewer ILD specialists and under-recognition of disease undoubtedly result in substantial underdiagnosis.”

Even in high-income countries, she added, some patients with ILD likely remain undiagnosed because symptoms such as breathlessness and cough are often attributed to more common conditions.

Also read: From Occasional to Long-Term Smoking, Experts Explain How Much Lung Damage Can Actually Reverse After Quitting?

What Is Interstitial Lung Disease?

ILD is not a single disease but a group of more than 200 lung conditions. The disease affects the interstitium, the tissue surrounding and supporting the lungs’ air sacs, or alveoli. In ILD, this tissue can become inflamed and/or scarred.

As scarring progresses, the lungs can become stiffer, making it harder for them to expand and reducing the efficiency of oxygen transfer. As the disease progresses, the lung shrinks, making it difficult for the patient to breathe.

According to Prof. Marlies, there is a rise in ILD diagnoses due to several factors, such as:

• Better awareness
• More HRCT scans
• Better diagnosis
• Ageing populations
• Autoimmune disease
• Environmental and occupational exposure.

When Should Doctors Suspect ILD?

Some forms of ILD can be treated more effectively when identified early, before permanent lung damage occurs.

“Unfortunately, many patients still reach an ILD specialist late. Breathlessness and cough may initially be treated as asthma, infection or sometimes even tuberculosis. By the time a CT scan is done and the patient reaches an ILD clinic, significant scarring may already have developed,” Dr Asmita Mehta, Professor and Head, Department of Respiratory Medicine at Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, told HealthandMe.

“A dry cough and gradually progressive breathlessness lasting for more than three months, particularly breathlessness while walking or climbing stairs, should raise suspicion of ILD rather than simply being attributed to asthma, infection or ageing,” she added.

Read More: US Cancer Death Rates Fall For Men, Women: Lung Cancer Progress Drives Decline

Doctors should think of ILD especially when these symptoms do not improve with usual treatment, when fine crackling sounds are heard in the lungs, or when oxygen levels fall during walking.

It is also important to ask about joint pain, skin changes, dry eyes or mouth, and exposure to birds, mould, biomass smoke or occupational dust. Sometimes the clue to ILD is outside the lungs, the expert said.

ILD And COVID-19

Pre-existing ILD was associated with worse outcomes during COVID-19. Now, six years later, some patients who had severe COVID-19 also continue to show persistent lung abnormalities.

“The reassuring part is that not every abnormal CT after COVID means progressive lung fibrosis. In many patients, the lung changes gradually improve or remain stable. Some patients who had very severe COVID, prolonged ICU admission, or required ventilation may be left with persistent scarring and may need longer follow-up,” Dr Asmita said.

What Does ILD Look Like In India?

Common ILD diagnoses seen in India include connective tissue disease-associated ILD (CTD-ILD), hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), sarcoidosis and idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP).

Dr Asmita said that, apart from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, ILD related to autoimmune diseases and environmental exposures is also commonly seen in India. These exposures can include birds, mould, biomass smoke and certain occupations.

Epidemiological reviews estimate the overall prevalence of ILD in India to range between 49.0 and 98.1 per 100,000 people, with an annual crude incidence rate of 10.1 to 20.2 per 100,000 population.

India is also building a larger national evidence base through the ICMR-led Indian Network of Pulmonary Fibrosis (INPF) registry.

Biggest Challenges For ILD Patients In India

• Delayed diagnosis: Symptoms can be mistaken for asthma, infections, or tuberculosis.
• Limited specialist access: ILD specialists and advanced diagnostic facilities are concentrated in larger centres.
• High treatment costs: Medicines, investigations, oxygen, and pulmonary rehabilitation can be expensive.
• Limited transplant access: Lung transplantation remains available only to a limited number of eligible patients.
• Low awareness: Many patients and families are unfamiliar with ILD and its long-term nature.

“We therefore need not only earlier diagnosis, but better awareness, affordable treatment, wider access to ILD specialists and stronger advanced-care and transplant programs,” Dr Asmita said.

Humans and most mammals have two sex chromosomes, X and Y. Females typically have two X chromosomes (XX), while males typically have one X and one Y chromosome (XY). As men age, many of their cells gradually lose the Y chromosome, due to a common genetic change.

Research has shown that cancer incidence and mortality rate are more among men than women. A new study may offer clues as to why.

Researchers from the University of Arizona found that loss of the Y chromosome in men’s tissues could create conditions that allow cancer to develop.

The research, published in JCI Insights, found that Y chromosome loss creates a pre-neoplastic field effect — a hidden zone of genetic vulnerability in normal-appearing tissue that may provide fertile ground for cancer development.

What Did The Study Find?

Also read: US Cancer Death Rates Fall For Men, Women: Lung Cancer Progress Drives Decline

Previous studies have linked loss of the Y chromosome in blood cells to an increased risk of disease. The new study systematically profiled Y chromosome loss across normal, precancerous and cancerous tissues from 11 major human organs.

“We were able to show that the loss of the Y chromosome is found in normal-appearing tissues adjacent to a tumor,” said physician-scientist Dr. Dan Theodorescu of the University of Arizona Cancer Center.

“That finding is what makes this discovery so exciting. It suggests we may be looking at one of the earliest signposts of cancer forming.”

The team analyzed 1,000 tissue samples from 405 men, using an automated fluorescent imaging system to examine more than 4.3 million individual cell nuclei and measure the ratio of Y to X chromosomes.

In one part of the study, researchers created detailed maps of bladder tissue removed during cancer surgery.

The maps showed that Y chromosome loss increased as tissue progressed from normal tissue to early abnormal cells and then to cancer.

Y chromosome loss in normal-appearing tissue was highest in samples from colon, rectal, esophageal, pancreatic and lung cancers.

“We are now thinking of this as a gradient, similar to a hillside that slowly gets steeper,” Theodorescu said. “The closer the tissue is to a cancer, the more Y chromosome loss we see. That gradient could one day help doctors suspect trouble in biopsies that miss a smaller cancer.”

How Y Chromosome Loss May Affect Cancer

Read More: UK NHS Trust To Review 4,500 More Breast Cancer Cases After 20 Unnecessary Mastectomies

Theodorescu’s previous research examined how loss of the Y chromosome in cancer cells can help them evade the immune system. This may help explain why Y chromosome loss has been associated with higher mortality from certain carcinomas.

What Does The Y Chromosome Do?

The Y chromosome spans more than 59 million DNA base pairs and accounts for almost 2% of the DNA in human cells. It contains roughly 70 to 200 genes involved in protein production.

The chromosome contains genes that play important roles in male sex development and fertility, including sperm production.

Beyond reproduction, research suggests that the Y chromosome can influence immune and inflammatory responses in men, potentially affecting susceptibility to certain diseases.

READ: Multicancer Blood Test Detects 17 Cancer In A Large Study: Can It Replace Mammograms & Colonoscopies?

Cancer Risk In Men

Globally, cancer is diagnosed more often in men than in women, with men having roughly a 25% higher incidence rate. Men also account for a greater share of cancer deaths worldwide.

Some of the most common cancers affecting men include prostate, lung, colorectal and skin cancers. Early detection and appropriate screening can improve the chances of successful treatment for several types of cancer.