Microwaves are a common appliance in every household now. You will see it in kitchens of not just houses, but offices, cafeterias, and co working space. However, there are studies that show that heating food in a microwave could be a health concern. While it does come handy, there are questions about harmful radiation and nutrient loss and heating safety that still linger.
Some research suggests that microwaving may cause nutritional loss, particularly in vegetables. For example, studies have shown that microwaving broccoli with water diminishes its flavonoid content, which are anti-inflammatory compounds. However, experts note that cooking method and duration have a significant influence on nutrient retention.
Surprisingly, several studies indicate that microwaving preserves more nutrients than traditional cooking methods. A study comparing microwaved versus oven-cooked ready meals found that the microwaved version contained somewhat more vitamin C. Another study discovered that microwaving some vegetables, such as broccoli and green beans, may retain more beneficial compounds than boiling.
Ultimately, the nutrient loss really vary on the type of food which is being heated and how it is being cooked. Experts also recommend using minimal water and shorter cooking times to maximize the nutrient retention.
Plastic containers and heating food in it, has always been a topic of debate. While containers do come with microwave-safe stamps, is it really safe to heat them with food?
According to research, when certain plastics are subjected to heat, they produce compounds such as phthalates and bisphenol A (BPA). These substances have been associated to hormonal disturbance, metabolic problems, and perhaps reproductive concerns.
A study also took in account over 400 plastic food containers that were microwave-safe and found that most of them leaked hormone-disrupting chemicals. These are phthalates, warn experts, which are commonly used in food packaging and can interfere with body's hormonal balance, and increase risk of diabetes or even high blood pressure.
Additionally, BPA exposure has been associated with fertility issues and immune system disruptions.
To minimize this risk, experts recommend using glass or ceramic container when microwaving foods. If you must use a plastic container, make sure the container is not damaged or old, as they are more prone to leach harmful chemicals.
Concerns about microwave radiation have been largely debunked by decades of research. Microwaves use non-ionizing radiation, which does not have enough energy to damage DNA or cause cancer. The electromagnetic waves used in microwaves are similar to those from radios and light bulbs.
Experts emphasize that microwave ovens are designed to contain radiation, preventing exposure. As long as the microwave is in good condition and the door seals properly, there is no significant health risk from microwave radiation.
Microwaving food could sometimes also lead to uneven cooking and it can create some risks to food safety. Thus, experts advertise to use microwave only to reheat the food and not to actually cook raw food. For safe reheating, food should reach at least 82°C (176°F) throughout to kill bacteria.
Credits: Canva
A GP has warned that people can catch Covid more than once in a short span, including while they are still unwell from a previous infection. In some cases, this may even involve picking up two strains of the virus at the same time, a situation doctors are calling “double Covid”.
New figures from the UK Health Security Agency show confirmed Covid cases have risen by 11 per cent. In the week leading up to January 9, 51 deaths were recorded and more than 500 people were in hospital with the virus.
Speaking to the BBC, GP Dr Nish Manek said it is possible to be infected again while still dealing with ongoing symptoms, including long Covid. She explained that having long Covid does not provide immunity against reinfection.
According to Dr Manek, protection from a previous infection or vaccination reduces over time. New variants are also better at evading the immune system, making repeat infections more likely.
As a result, someone managing long Covid symptoms may still catch Covid again. A fresh infection can trigger a relapse of symptoms or slow down recovery.
She added that a positive test may reflect either the same strain or a new variant. In both cases, it is still Covid and should be taken seriously.
Dr Manek stressed that vaccination remains important. While vaccines may not fully prevent infection, they significantly reduce the risk of severe illness and hospitalisation.
She said Covid continues to change and remains present in the community. Simple protective steps still matter, including testing when unwell, wearing masks in crowded indoor settings, and staying up to date with vaccinations.
Doctors say symptoms linked to current variants often affect the upper respiratory tract and can feel similar to a bad cold or flu.
Commonly reported symptoms include a very painful sore throat described as feeling like razor blades, a hoarse voice with swollen glands, blocked or runny nose, sneezing, and extreme tiredness. Fever, a persistent cough, and body aches are still widely seen.
Loss of taste or smell is now reported far less often than during the early stages of the pandemic.
The UK has moved to a targeted vaccination approach, focusing on those most at risk of serious illness.
The current winter vaccination programme is coming to an end. The final date to receive this dose is January 31, 2026. You are eligible if you are aged 75 or over, live in a care home for older adults, or are aged six months or older and immunosuppressed due to medical treatment or long-term conditions.
A spring booster programme has been confirmed for 2026. Appointments are expected to open in late March, with vaccinations starting from April 13. Eligibility criteria remain the same as the winter programme.
Doctors continue to urge those eligible to get vaccinated while doses are still available.
Credits: AI Generated
A lace-like pattern appearing on the skin may sometimes point to blocked arteries. Health experts warn that this netted discoloration can, in certain cases, be linked to damage in tissues and organs.
Heart and circulatory diseases remain the leading cause of death worldwide, claiming close to 18 million lives every year. This group includes serious conditions such as stroke, coronary artery disease, and heart failure.
In the UK, cardiovascular disease is responsible for around one quarter of all deaths. Because of its scale and severity, recognising warning signs early can save lives.
Most people are familiar with common symptoms like chest pain. What is less widely known is that heart-related problems do not always announce themselves clearly. Some signs are subtle and can appear in unexpected places, including the skin.
The American Academy of Dermatology highlights one particular skin pattern that may be linked to heart and blood vessel problems. A blue or purple, net-like discoloration on the skin can sometimes indicate reduced blood flow or a blocked artery.
This condition is known as livedo reticularis. It is believed to occur when small blood vessels near the skin tighten suddenly or when circulation close to the skin becomes uneven.
In many cases, livedo reticularis is not a cause for concern. Cold temperatures are a common trigger, and the pattern often fades once the skin warms up. Certain medications can also produce this effect without posing a serious health risk.
According to the dermatology body, some people notice the pattern when they feel cold, only for it to disappear as their skin warms. When medication is responsible, it is generally considered harmless.
In some situations, the same skin pattern can be linked to a condition known as cholesterol embolisation syndrome. This happens when tiny arteries become blocked by cholesterol particles.
Such blockages can interfere with blood supply and lead to damage in tissues and organs. For this reason, experts stress the importance of medical evaluation to rule out any underlying or undiagnosed disease.
The Mayo Clinic advises seeking medical advice if the mottled skin does not fade with warmth or if it appears alongside other worrying symptoms. You should also consult a doctor if painful lumps or sores develop in the affected area, if you already have a condition that affects blood flow to your limbs, or if you have a connective tissue disorder and notice new skin changes.
Doctors also caution that a similar-looking condition, called livedo racemosa, is more often linked to serious underlying illnesses.
Skin changes are only one possible clue. Other symptoms linked to heart disease include chest discomfort, pain or weakness in the arms or legs, shortness of breath, irregular heartbeats, dizziness, unusual tiredness, and swelling in the limbs.
If any of these symptoms feel concerning or persistent, it is important to speak to your GP for further advice.
Credits: Canva and X
A diagnostic report from Madhya Pradesh’s Satna district has sparked shock and concern after it incorrectly stated that a 47-year-old man had a uterus. The incident has raised serious questions about negligence and accuracy in medical testing.
The report was issued to Niranjan Prajapati, chairman of the Uchehra Nagar Panchayat, who had gone for a sonography after experiencing abdominal pain and swelling. Instead of clarity about his condition, he received a report that appeared to describe female reproductive organs, including an inverted uterus.
Prajapati underwent the ultrasound at a diagnostic center on Station Road in Satna on January 13. Initially, he did not closely examine the report and followed the prescribed treatment. However, when his condition did not improve, he sought further medical advice.
“I was sick and had stomach pain. I first got treatment in Unchahara and then went for sonography in Satna,” Prajapati said. “I did not pay much attention to the report at first and took medicines, but there was no relief.”
He later visited a doctor in Jabalpur, where the mistake was clearly identified. “The doctor told me straight that this report cannot belong to me,” Prajapati recalled. “I said the report has my name on it, but it mentioned a uterus. That is when I realized something was seriously wrong.”
The report not only listed a uterus but also described its position, despite the patient being male. Medical experts say such an error goes far beyond a minor clerical mistake.
A senior doctor, speaking on condition of anonymity, said incorrect diagnostic reports can have serious consequences. “A wrong sonography report can mislead treatment, cause unnecessary stress to the patient, and in some cases become life-threatening if doctors act on false findings,” the expert said.
Attempts to seek clarification from the diagnostic center did not yield answers. Dr Arvind Saraf, associated with the facility, declined to comment on the incident, adding to concerns about accountability and quality checks.
Following the incident, Prajapati filed a formal complaint at the local police station. The matter has also been taken up by the Health Department.
Chief Medical and Health Officer of Satna, Dr Manoj Shukla, confirmed that an investigation is underway. “This complaint has come to my notice. We are examining the report thoroughly. If any irregularity or negligence is found during the investigation, appropriate action will be taken,” he said.
Officials are expected to review how the report was generated and whether standard diagnostic protocols were followed.
Sonography, also known as ultrasound, is a commonly used imaging test that uses sound waves to create images of internal organs. It does not involve radiation and is generally considered safe. However, experts stress that accuracy and proper verification are crucial, as reports directly guide diagnosis and treatment.
The incident has once again highlighted the need for stricter checks and accountability in diagnostic services, especially when errors can directly affect patient health and trust in the medical system.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited