The global challenge of HIV/AIDS remains one of the most pressing public health issues today. According to the latest data from UNAIDS, around 38.4 million people worldwide are living with HIV/AIDS, underlining the need for not only medical intervention but also comprehensive awareness, education, and social change. Despite the significant strides made in treatment and prevention, the confusion surrounding the relationship between HIV and AIDS still persists.

Young people have become influential advocates in the fight against HIV/AIDS. Research from UNICEF shows that youth-led initiatives can lower HIV transmission rates by as much as 45% in targeted communities. These young activists utilize digital platforms and peer-to-peer education to dispel myths, promote safe practices, and foster supportive environments for those affected by HIV/AIDS.

Dr Gowri Kulkarni, an expert in Internal Medicine, explains that while the terms HIV and AIDS are often used interchangeably, they are distinctly different. "HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) is a virus that attacks the immune system, whereas AIDS (Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome) is a condition that occurs when HIV severely damages the immune system," she clarifies. To understand the implications of these differences, it's important to explore the fundamental distinctions between the two.

1. HIV is a Virus; AIDS is a Syndrome

HIV is the virus responsible for attacking the body’s immune system, specifically targeting CD4 cells, which are crucial for the body’s defense against infections. As HIV progresses, it destroys these cells, weakening the immune system over time. If left untreated, this continuous damage can lead to AIDS.

AIDS, on the other hand, is a syndrome, not a virus. Dr Kulkarni further elaborates that AIDS is a collection of symptoms and illnesses that emerge when the immune system is severely compromised due to prolonged HIV infection. It represents the most advanced stage of HIV, and is characterized by very low CD4 counts or the onset of opportunistic infections like tuberculosis, pneumonia, or certain cancers.

2. Not Everyone with HIV Develops AIDS

A key distinction to remember is that not everyone with HIV will progress to AIDS. Thanks to advancements in medicine, particularly antiretroviral therapy (ART), individuals living with HIV can manage the virus and maintain a healthy immune system for many years, or even decades, without ever developing AIDS. ART works by suppressing the virus to undetectable levels, effectively preventing the damage HIV would otherwise cause to the immune system.

Without treatment, however, HIV progresses through three stages:

- Acute HIV Infection: This stage occurs shortly after transmission and may include symptoms like fever, fatigue, and swollen lymph nodes.

- Chronic HIV Infection: Often asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic, the virus continues to damage the immune system but at a slower rate.

- AIDS: This is the final stage, marked by severe immune damage and the presence of infections that take advantage of the compromised immune defenses.

3. HIV is Transmissible; AIDS is Not

Another key distinction between HIV and AIDS is the way in which they are transmitted. HIV is highly contagious and can be transmitted through the exchange of bodily fluids such as blood, semen, vaginal fluids, and breast milk. It is primarily spread through unprotected sexual contact, sharing needles, or from mother to child during childbirth or breastfeeding.

AIDS, however, is not transmissible. It is not a disease that can be passed from one person to another. Rather, AIDS is the result of untreated, advanced HIV infection and is a direct consequence of the virus’s damage to the immune system.

4. Diagnosis Methods Differ

HIV and AIDS are diagnosed through different methods. HIV is diagnosed through blood tests or oral swabs that detect the presence of the virus or antibodies produced by the immune system in response to the virus. Early detection of HIV is crucial, as it allows for timely intervention and treatment, which can prevent the virus from progressing to AIDS.

AIDS, on the other hand, is diagnosed using more specific criteria. Dr Kulkarni notes that the diagnosis of AIDS is made when the individual’s CD4 cell count falls below 200 cells/mm³, or when opportunistic infections or certain cancers (such as Kaposi's sarcoma or lymphoma) are detected. Diagnosing AIDS involves a more thorough assessment of the individual’s immune function and overall health, as opposed to just the detection of HIV.

5. Treatment Goals Are Different

The treatment goals for HIV and AIDS differ significantly, although both involve antiretroviral therapy (ART). For HIV, the primary treatment goal is to suppress the virus to undetectable levels, thus maintaining a strong immune system and preventing further transmission of the virus. People living with HIV can often live long, healthy lives if they adhere to ART.

For individuals diagnosed with AIDS, the treatment plan becomes more complex. While ART remains an essential part of managing the virus, treatment for AIDS also focuses on addressing the opportunistic infections and secondary health complications associated with severe immune suppression. The goal of treatment for AIDS is not only to manage the HIV virus but also to improve the quality of life and extend survival by treating these secondary health issues.

Role of Community Engagement in Combatting HIV/AIDS

While the medical community has made great strides in managing HIV, the battle to curb its transmission is also a social and cultural issue. Dr Daman Ahuja, a public health expert, highlights that HIV/AIDS awareness and education are vital to reducing transmission rates and supporting those affected by the virus. "Young people, especially, have become key advocates in the fight against HIV/AIDS," says Dr Ahuja. "Research from UNICEF shows that youth-led initiatives can lower HIV transmission rates by as much as 45% in targeted communities."

Additionally, grassroots activism plays a significant role in raising awareness and addressing stigma. As the World Health Organization reports, community-based interventions have been proven to increase HIV testing rates and improve treatment adherence, which are crucial in the fight against the pandemic.

The ultimate goal of organizations like UNAIDS is to eliminate the HIV/AIDS pandemic by 2030. Achieving this requires global collaboration, from medical treatment advancements to public health strategies, education, and advocacy. Dr Kulkarni’s insight underscores the importance of early detection, treatment adherence, and community support in the fight against HIV/AIDS.

Dr Gowri Kulkarni is Head of Medical Operations at MediBuddy and Dr Daman Ahuja, a public health expert and has been associated with Red Ribbon Express Project of NACO between 2007-12.

A new, highly mutated COVID variant called 'Cicada' is spreading in the US. This is the BA.3.2 mutation of the COVID-19 variant. While nationally the cases of COVID have remained low, the BA.3.2 strain is gaining traction across the globe.

What Is The Cicada COVID Variant?

Cicada or the BA.3.2 strain emerged over a year ago, and simmered until last fall. However, this was when it started ramping up in countries including the US. As of February, BA.3.2 has been detected in at least 25 states, noted the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

The variant's slew of genetic changes in its spike protein is what has made people concerned. This is what makes it unique and distinct from other variants in circulation.

According to Andrew Pekosz, Ph.D., a virologist at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, as reported by TODAY.com, "It [the variant] has a lot of mutations that may cause it to look different to your immune system."

The SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID-19 mutates constantly and spreads over time. It thus leads to emergence of new variants.

A new study published in the CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report suggests that emerging variants could weaken protection gained from prior COVID-19 infection or vaccination.

One such “hyper-mutated” strain, BA.3.2, is now being closely tracked by public health officials. In December 2025, the World Health Organization classified it as a “variant under monitoring.”

Read: COVID Variant BA.3.2 Spreads To 23 Countries: Is The Variant Under Monitoring A Cause Of Worry?

When Was Cicada COVID Variant First Detected?

BA.3.2 was first detected in South Africa in November 2024. It is a descendant of BA.3, an Omicron subvariant that appeared in 2022 and briefly circulated alongside BA.1 and BA.2, according to the CDC.

Although BA.3 never became dominant, it did not completely disappear. “It fizzled out, but persisted at low levels,” said Pekosz. After two years and dozens of mutations, BA.3.2 eventually emerged.

For much of 2024, the variant spread quietly, overshadowed by dominant strains like Nimbus and XFG, which stem from BA.2. However, by September, BA.3.2 began gaining ground. “It was under the radar, replicating, until it started spreading more efficiently between people,” Pekosz noted.

What sets BA.3.2 apart is its spike protein, which carries an unusually high number of mutations — around 70 to 75. This makes it significantly different from strains such as JN.1 and LP.8.1, which current COVID-19 vaccines are designed to target.

The CDC describes BA.3.2 as a “genetically distinct” lineage compared to recent variants. Early laboratory studies suggest it may be capable of evading existing immunity, as its spike protein changes help it escape neutralising antibodies.

What Makes Cicada So Unique?

The BA.3.2 variant is nicknamed by T Ryan Gregory, Ph.D., a professor of evolutionary biology at the University of Guelph. He wrote on X, formerly Twitter: "Well, it's that time again. Meet "Cicada", BA.3.2* (including descendant RE.*). This one has been underground for years (its ancestor BA.3 hasn't been circulating since early 2022, and didn't do much then either) but is now emerging as a contender for the next major lineage."

While most of the symptoms of this new variant remains same as from the other variants, one thing that stands out here is the gastrointestinal symptoms that cicada could cause. However, experts note that this variant will not make anyone more sicker. Other symptoms include:

• Cough
• Fever or chills
• Sore throat
• Congestion
• Shortness of breath
• Loss of smell or taste
• Fatigue
• Headache

On March 13, the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment introduced the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Bill, 2026, in the Lok Sabha. Amid opposition, the Rajya Sabha gave its not to the Bill on March 25. The bill seeks to amend the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Act 2019. The bill was passed in the Lok Sabha on March 24.

What Makes The Bill So Controversial?

What the law originally promised: India's legal framework for transgenders rights comes from the landmark NALSA v. Union of India ruling. This is where the Supreme Court recognized transgender persons as 'third gender' and affirmed their fundamental rights, including access to healthcare. The 2019 amendment followed and promised non-discrimination in education employment, housing, and crucially, healthcare. As per a Live Law analysis, the law was intended to align with constitutional guarantees of equality and dignity, especially under Article 14 (Equality Before Law), 15 (Prohibition of Discrimination), and 21 (Right To Life).

Recent amendments have however raised concerns because of how it could reshape access to healthcare and recognition of identity.

What Does The New Bill Introduce?

The Bill introduces stricter verification of identification and tightens the definition of transgender identity by replacing self-identification with mandatory medical certification. This, many argue is against the 2019 Act supported by the NALSA judgment.

'We, the transgender people of India, reject the erasure of our identity," writes Dr Aqsa Shaikh for the media outlet - The Indian Express. One of the biggest concerns she and many pointed was the continued requirement of official certification for gender identity.

While the law does not always explicitly mandate surgery, activists argue that in practice, access to updated identity documents often becomes tied to medical procedures.

This creates barriers to gender-affirming healthcare, which includes hormone therapy, surgeries, and mental health support.

Dr Shaikh, who is a transgender professor at the Department of Community Medicine in Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Jamia Hamdard, argues that such provisions undermine the principle of self-identification, which was central to the NALSA judgment.

Gaps In Gender-Affirming Healthcare Access

Experts have long pointed out that transgender healthcare in India is already limited:

• Few public hospitals offer structured gender-affirming services
• Mental health support tailored to transgender individuals remains scarce
• Hormone therapy is often accessed informally without supervision

Critics also argue that the amendments do little to expand healthcare infrastructure, focusing instead on administrative control.

Health activists have also flagged the absence of:

• Universal insurance coverage for gender-affirming procedures
• Clear funding commitments for public healthcare services
• Standardized treatment protocols across states

This is significant because transgender individuals face disproportionately high rates of:

• Depression and anxiety
• Substance use disorders
• Suicide risk

Without systemic healthcare guarantees, the law’s protections risk remaining symbolic.

Erasure Of Identity

An opinion piece in The Leaflet describes this bill as an "architecture of erasure". The piece argued that it weakens recognition of diverse transgender identities by reinforcing bureaucratic control. Dr Shaikh argues that the community rejects any framework that takes away the right to self-identify, calling it a rollback of constitutional morality.

Furthermore, a LiveMint report notes that the amendment is a "hurried, short-sighted decision" because it was passed without adequate consultation with transgender communities, it ignores lived experiences and healthcare needs, and prioritizes regulation over welfare.

Live Law notes that any law that govern transgender rights must remain consistent with the NALSA judgment. However, the recent amendment could dilute the principle supported by NALSA judgment that gender identity is based on self-perception and not state or medical approval.

Metformin Brain: A popular diabetes drug, prescribed to manage type 2 diabetes by controlling blood sugar, which has been in use for 60 years - metformin, now shows how it is directly linked to the brain.

A drug used for over six decades did not have a study that made scientists sure of exactly how it works, until now. Researchers from the Baylor College of Medicine in the US were able to identify in 2025 a brain pathway that the drug seems to work through. It also has impacts on biological processes in other areas of the body.

"It's been widely accepted that metformin lowers blood glucose primarily by reducing glucose output in the liver. Other studies have found that it acts through the gut," said Makoto Fukuda, a pathophysiologist at Baylor.

"It's been widely accepted that metformin lowers blood glucose primarily by reducing glucose output in the liver. Other studies have found that it acts through the gut," said Makoto Fukuda, a pathophysiologist at Baylor.

What the Study Found

In a 2025 study on mice, researchers observed that metformin travels to the VMH and switches off Rap1 activity. This action appears to be crucial for its ability to control blood sugar. To test this further, scientists bred mice that lacked Rap1. In these mice, metformin no longer improved diabetes-like symptoms, even though other medications still worked.

This points to something important. Metformin may be working through a completely different pathway compared to other diabetes drugs, one that depends on the brain.

Read: Metformin Controls Blood Sugar With Help From Brain Neurons, Finds Study

The researchers also identified specific nerve cells involved in this process. They found that SF1 neurons become active when metformin enters the brain, suggesting these cells play a direct role in how the drug works.

Why This Matters

These findings could change how doctors and scientists think about diabetes treatment. If metformin’s brain pathway is confirmed in humans, future therapies could be designed to target these exact neurons, making treatments more precise and possibly more effective.

There is also a bigger picture. Metformin has already been linked to benefits beyond diabetes, including slowing aspects of brain aging and improving longevity. In one study involving postmenopausal women, those taking metformin had a significantly lower risk of dying before the age of 90 compared to those on another diabetes drug.

Read: Metformin Can Help Lower Risk Of Age-related Vision Loss: Study

What Comes Next

While the results are promising, human studies are still needed. If confirmed, this discovery could open the door to new treatments that not only manage blood sugar better but also tap into the brain’s role in overall health and aging.

It also reinforces an emerging idea that metformin is not just acting on the body’s metabolic organs, but quietly influencing the brain at much lower doses.