The global challenge of HIV/AIDS remains one of the most pressing public health issues today. According to the latest data from UNAIDS, around 38.4 million people worldwide are living with HIV/AIDS, underlining the need for not only medical intervention but also comprehensive awareness, education, and social change. Despite the significant strides made in treatment and prevention, the confusion surrounding the relationship between HIV and AIDS still persists.

Young people have become influential advocates in the fight against HIV/AIDS. Research from UNICEF shows that youth-led initiatives can lower HIV transmission rates by as much as 45% in targeted communities. These young activists utilize digital platforms and peer-to-peer education to dispel myths, promote safe practices, and foster supportive environments for those affected by HIV/AIDS.

Dr Gowri Kulkarni, an expert in Internal Medicine, explains that while the terms HIV and AIDS are often used interchangeably, they are distinctly different. "HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) is a virus that attacks the immune system, whereas AIDS (Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome) is a condition that occurs when HIV severely damages the immune system," she clarifies. To understand the implications of these differences, it's important to explore the fundamental distinctions between the two.

1. HIV is a Virus; AIDS is a Syndrome

HIV is the virus responsible for attacking the body’s immune system, specifically targeting CD4 cells, which are crucial for the body’s defense against infections. As HIV progresses, it destroys these cells, weakening the immune system over time. If left untreated, this continuous damage can lead to AIDS.

AIDS, on the other hand, is a syndrome, not a virus. Dr Kulkarni further elaborates that AIDS is a collection of symptoms and illnesses that emerge when the immune system is severely compromised due to prolonged HIV infection. It represents the most advanced stage of HIV, and is characterized by very low CD4 counts or the onset of opportunistic infections like tuberculosis, pneumonia, or certain cancers.

2. Not Everyone with HIV Develops AIDS

A key distinction to remember is that not everyone with HIV will progress to AIDS. Thanks to advancements in medicine, particularly antiretroviral therapy (ART), individuals living with HIV can manage the virus and maintain a healthy immune system for many years, or even decades, without ever developing AIDS. ART works by suppressing the virus to undetectable levels, effectively preventing the damage HIV would otherwise cause to the immune system.

Without treatment, however, HIV progresses through three stages:

- Acute HIV Infection: This stage occurs shortly after transmission and may include symptoms like fever, fatigue, and swollen lymph nodes.

- Chronic HIV Infection: Often asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic, the virus continues to damage the immune system but at a slower rate.

- AIDS: This is the final stage, marked by severe immune damage and the presence of infections that take advantage of the compromised immune defenses.

3. HIV is Transmissible; AIDS is Not

Another key distinction between HIV and AIDS is the way in which they are transmitted. HIV is highly contagious and can be transmitted through the exchange of bodily fluids such as blood, semen, vaginal fluids, and breast milk. It is primarily spread through unprotected sexual contact, sharing needles, or from mother to child during childbirth or breastfeeding.

AIDS, however, is not transmissible. It is not a disease that can be passed from one person to another. Rather, AIDS is the result of untreated, advanced HIV infection and is a direct consequence of the virus’s damage to the immune system.

4. Diagnosis Methods Differ

HIV and AIDS are diagnosed through different methods. HIV is diagnosed through blood tests or oral swabs that detect the presence of the virus or antibodies produced by the immune system in response to the virus. Early detection of HIV is crucial, as it allows for timely intervention and treatment, which can prevent the virus from progressing to AIDS.

AIDS, on the other hand, is diagnosed using more specific criteria. Dr Kulkarni notes that the diagnosis of AIDS is made when the individual’s CD4 cell count falls below 200 cells/mm³, or when opportunistic infections or certain cancers (such as Kaposi's sarcoma or lymphoma) are detected. Diagnosing AIDS involves a more thorough assessment of the individual’s immune function and overall health, as opposed to just the detection of HIV.

5. Treatment Goals Are Different

The treatment goals for HIV and AIDS differ significantly, although both involve antiretroviral therapy (ART). For HIV, the primary treatment goal is to suppress the virus to undetectable levels, thus maintaining a strong immune system and preventing further transmission of the virus. People living with HIV can often live long, healthy lives if they adhere to ART.

For individuals diagnosed with AIDS, the treatment plan becomes more complex. While ART remains an essential part of managing the virus, treatment for AIDS also focuses on addressing the opportunistic infections and secondary health complications associated with severe immune suppression. The goal of treatment for AIDS is not only to manage the HIV virus but also to improve the quality of life and extend survival by treating these secondary health issues.

Role of Community Engagement in Combatting HIV/AIDS

While the medical community has made great strides in managing HIV, the battle to curb its transmission is also a social and cultural issue. Dr Daman Ahuja, a public health expert, highlights that HIV/AIDS awareness and education are vital to reducing transmission rates and supporting those affected by the virus. "Young people, especially, have become key advocates in the fight against HIV/AIDS," says Dr Ahuja. "Research from UNICEF shows that youth-led initiatives can lower HIV transmission rates by as much as 45% in targeted communities."

Additionally, grassroots activism plays a significant role in raising awareness and addressing stigma. As the World Health Organization reports, community-based interventions have been proven to increase HIV testing rates and improve treatment adherence, which are crucial in the fight against the pandemic.

The ultimate goal of organizations like UNAIDS is to eliminate the HIV/AIDS pandemic by 2030. Achieving this requires global collaboration, from medical treatment advancements to public health strategies, education, and advocacy. Dr Kulkarni’s insight underscores the importance of early detection, treatment adherence, and community support in the fight against HIV/AIDS.

Dr Gowri Kulkarni is Head of Medical Operations at MediBuddy and Dr Daman Ahuja, a public health expert and has been associated with Red Ribbon Express Project of NACO between 2007-12.

Climate change caused a 10 per cent global increase in Salmonella antibiotic resistance genes between 1940 and 2023, according to the first-of-its-kind study published in The Lancet Planetary Health journal today.

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is mainly driven by the overuse and misuse of antibiotics, which allows resistant bacteria to survive and spread.

However, rising temperatures and changing rainfall patterns can influence how bacteria survive, mutate, and spread, potentially increasing the exchange of antibiotic resistance genes.

“The accumulated evidence suggests that climate change is an accelerating force behind the global spread of antimicrobial resistance,” the study authors wrote in the paper.

What Are The Findings?

The study provides supporting evidence that AMR doesn’t just increase steadily as temperatures rise, but that the number of resistance genes changes over time in a more complicated way, depending on both temperature and rainfall. This suggests that environmental changes can speed up how bacteria adapt to antibiotics.

“These findings reinforce the idea that climate change alters microbial ecological stability and accelerates resistance evolution across human, animal, and environmental reservoirs," said the global researchers.

How Was The Study Conducted?

The current study analyzed the genomes of more than 480,000 Salmonella samples from 139 countries, collected between 1940 and 2023, and compared levels of antibiotic resistance genes with changes in average temperature and rainfall over time.

Of the total, 82 per cent of countries saw increases in antibiotic resistance genes in Salmonella, with the strongest climate-associated increases occurring in the Middle East and North Africa, followed by South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa.

While the study shows a link between climate change and antibiotic resistance genes in Salmonella, it does not prove that climate change directly causes the increase.

The study also used a model to predict the change in antibiotic resistance genes in Salmonella by 2100 under different climate emissions scenarios.

The model suggests that if countries meet low-emission climate targets and strengthen efforts to use antibiotics responsibly, levels of resistance genes could be 24% lower than under the highest-emission scenario. However, they caution that these projections, as with all models, involve uncertainty.

The researchers stressed the need to consider climate change when monitoring and addressing AMR. They add that stronger climate action, alongside responsible antibiotic use and improved disease surveillance across humans, animals, and the environment, will be important in limiting the future spread of AMR.

What Is Salmonella?

As per the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Salmonella is a group of bacteria that can cause gastrointestinal illness and fever called salmonellosis. It can be spread by food handlers who do not wash their hands and/or the surfaces and tools they use between food preparation steps. It can also happen when people consume uncooked and raw food. Salmonella can also spread from animals to people.

Common symptoms of Salmonella include

• diarrhea,
• fever,
• stomach cramps 6 hours to 6 days after being exposed to the bacteria.

Children younger than 5, adults 65 and older, and people with weakened immune systems are more likely to have severe illness.

Indian summers are not just uncomfortable; they are becoming increasingly dangerous. With temperatures frequently crossing 45–48°C, heatwaves are putting excess stress on the human body, which hitherto had not experienced this level of heat strain. Now, add smoking to this already hostile environment and, like adding fuel to a fire, two harmful components combine to multiply the damage. Dr Shubham Garg, Director of Surgical Oncology, Dharamshila Narayana Superspeciality Hospital, Delhi, spoke about the risks of stepping out to grab a smoke during extreme heatwaves.

Smoking during heatwaves doesn’t just worsen existing risks; it accelerates dehydration, strains the heart, damages the lungs, and pushes the body closer to heat exhaustion or heatstroke. Here’s why lighting up in extreme heat is far more dangerous than most people realise.

Heatwaves Already Stress the Body—Smoking Adds Fuel to the Fire

When temperatures soar, your body works overtime to cool itself. A host of processes happen to aid in this—your blood vessels dilate, there could be an increase in heart rate, and sweating intensifies in order to regulate body temperature. When you smoke, it interferes with these very natural defense mechanisms of your body.

Nicotine results in vasoconstriction—narrowing of blood vessels—which makes it very difficult for the body to release heat trapped inside. The carbon monoxide from cigarettes reduces oxygen delivery to tissues. The result? Less oxygen reaches your organs, which are, in fact, working harder in the extreme heat. This is a perilous combination that can affect the body in many ways.

Dehydration Happens Faster Than You Think

A heatwave leads to sweating and, consequently, loss of fluids and electrolytes. And when you go for smoking a cigarette, it leads to fluid loss and delayed hydration. Nicotine acts as a mild diuretic, which contributes to increased fluid loss. Smoking also suppresses thirst signals, thus delaying hydration.

Collectively these factors raise the risk of severe dehydration, which can trigger dizziness, muscle cramps, low blood pressure, and confusion—all of which are early signs of heat exhaustion. Many smokers ignore these signs or dismiss them altogether.

A Deadly Mix for the Heart

Cardiovascular strain can happen independently through either smoking or heat. That in itself is a threat one should keep an eye out for. However, when combined, they pose a compelling risk of:

1. Sudden spikes or drops in blood pressure
2. Irregular heart rhythms
3. Heat-induced cardiac events

During extremely hot weather conditions, especially during a heatwave, the heart has to exert more effort to maintain circulation and cooling in the body. Smoking elevates heart rate and blood pressure further while also thickening the blood and increasing the risk of heart attacks and strokes, especially in people with pre-existing diabetes, hypertension, or heart disease.

Lungs Struggle More in Hot, Polluted Air

Hot weather is bad for air pollution levels too, as it traps smoke, dust, and harmful gases close to the ground. When one smokes in these conditions, it severely compromises lung function:

1. Airways become inflamed and constricted
2. Oxygen exchange efficiency drops
3. Symptoms like breathlessness, coughing, and chest tightness worsen

For people with asthma, COPD, or other respiratory conditions, smoking during a heatwave is likely to trigger severe flare-ups and emergency hospital visits.

Heat + Smoking Accelerates Ageing and Skin Damage

Extreme heat is damaging not just for the heart but for the skin as well. The skin becomes dehydrated, and collagen breaks down. Smoking compounds this damage by reducing blood flow and oxygen supply to the skin.

The result:

1. Faster wrinkles and sagging skin
2. Increased pigmentation and dullness
3. Delayed healing of rashes, infections, and sun damage

In short, smoking during summer doesn’t just harm internal organs; it visibly accelerates the ageing process.

Higher Risk of Heat Exhaustion and Heatstroke

Smoking reduces the body’s ability to regulate temperature effectively. This makes smokers more vulnerable to heat exhaustion (fatigue, nausea, headache, dizziness) and heatstroke (confusion, collapse, organ failure).

Heatstroke is a medical emergency and can be fatal if not treated promptly. Smokers often misread early warning signs as ‘normal summer weakness,' thus delaying care.

Why Cutting Down Isn’t Enough

Many smokers try to “reduce” smoking during summer. While any reduction helps, heatwaves are one of the worst times to smoke at all. Even a few cigarettes can significantly increase physiological stress when temperatures are extreme.

Smoking during heatwaves is not just bad—it’s dangerously synergistic. If there ever is a time to quit, or at least pause, this should be it. Because in peak summer, smoking doesn’t just harm you slowly. It fast-tracks damage, turning heat into a silent but serious health threat. In extreme heat, choosing not to smoke isn’t just a lifestyle choice—it’s a life-saving one.

When the heart stops functioning, time doesn’t stop with it. In cases of cardiac arrest, time serves as one of the most decisive factors between survival and irreversible loss. Within a couple of seconds, the body starts losing its oxygen supply. In a few minutes, the brain starts to suffer damage. And with each passing minute without intervention, the chances of survival reduce significantly.

This severe reality is at the centre of what Dr Ankit Desai, Paediatric Anaesthetist and Founder & Director of Children’s Anaesthesia Services, explains as “a race against biological shutdown — one where the bystander is the only lifeline”.

The silent collapse: what happens in cardiac arrest

Several people have the misconception that cardiac arrest is similar to a heart attack, but they are very different. A heart attack is a circulatory issue where the heart might still be beating. However, in cases of cardiac arrest, there is an electrical failure, and the heart suddenly stops pumping blood effectively.

Whenever this occurs, blood flow to the brain and other vital organs ceases immediately. The oxygen reserves in the brain are extremely limited and typically last for about 4 to 6 minutes before any permanent injury occurs.

This is where the concept of time sensitivity becomes more important. For every passing minute without CPR or defibrillation, the chances of survival drop by approximately 7–10%. By the time 10 minutes have elapsed without intervention, survival is extremely unlikely in most cases.

“The tragedy is not just the cardiac arrest itself,” explains Dr Desai, “but the silence that follows — when no one knows what to do or hesitates too long to act.”

The brain’s narrow window of survival

The brain is the first organ to be affected during cardiac arrest. Neurons are highly sensitive to oxygen deprivation. Brain cells start to malfunction within 3 minutes. By 5 minutes, the damage starts becoming increasingly severe. Beyond 10 minutes, the chances of meaningful recovery drastically reduce. This is why immediate CPR is not just a supportive measure but a bridge that keeps oxygen flowing artificially until a normal rhythm can be restored.

Chest compressions manually pump blood to the brain and heart, delaying cell death.

Why bystander action matters more than ambulance time

Emergency medical services, even in well-equipped systems, often take several minutes to reach a patient. In urban areas, response times may be shorter, but they are rarely instantaneous. In cardiac arrest, those minutes matter more than any hospital intervention.

Dr Desai emphasises that “the first responder is almost always not a doctor — it is a family member, a colleague, or a nearby stranger”.

This makes bystander CPR the most critical determinant of survival. Studies consistently show that when CPR is initiated immediately, survival rates can double or even triple compared to cases where no bystander action is taken.

Yet fear, hesitation, and lack of training remain major barriers. Many people worry about performing CPR incorrectly, causing harm, or being held legally responsible. In reality, doing nothing is far more dangerous than taking imperfect action.

The Chain of Survival: breaking down the timeline

Medical professionals often refer to this situation as the “Chain of Survival”, which includes early detection of cardiac arrest, immediate CPR, rapid defibrillation (AED use), advanced medical care, and post-resuscitation support. Every link in this chain is highly time-sensitive. Any delay in one step weakens the entire outcome. The strongest determinant, however, remains the second step — early CPR.

Automated External Defibrillators (AEDs), if available, can help restore a normal heart rhythm if used quickly. But again, their effectiveness decreases sharply with delay. The combination of CPR and early defibrillation within the first few minutes offers the best chance of survival.

Why awareness changes everything

The key difference between life and death is less about complexity and more about readiness.

Awareness training helps transform bystanders into responders. A person who knows how to identify cardiac arrest — unresponsiveness, absence of breathing, sudden collapse — is far more likely to act immediately rather than wait.

Dr Desai highlights a critical cultural gap: “We often associate medical emergencies with hospitals. But cardiac arrest begins in living rooms, offices, gyms, and streets. The response must begin there, too.”

Basic CPR training takes less than an hour to learn, but can influence outcomes for decades. Schools, workplaces, and community programmes play a vital role in normalising this skill.

Overcoming hesitation: the psychological barrier

One aspect of cardiac arrest that often gets overlooked is human hesitation. Bystanders often freeze due to shock and uncertainty. Some assume that someone else will step in. Others underestimate the severity of the situation.

Public awareness campaigns help highlight the simplicity of CPR, which helps overcome this barrier. Hands-only CPR focuses on continuous chest compressions without mouth-to-mouth breathing, making intervention much easier and more accessible. The message is simple: push hard, push fast, and don’t stop until help arrives.

A shift from reaction to preparedness

Cardiac arrest survival is not just a medical issue, but also one of public preparedness. The Chain of Survival starts long before the emergency happens. It starts with education, confidence, and awareness.

Dr Desai states that “if more people understood how little time they truly have, more lives would be saved not by hospitals, but by ordinary people doing extraordinary things in the first five minutes”.

Conclusion: time is the real patient

In cardiac arrest, the patient is not just the person who collapses — it is time itself. Every second lost reduces the chance of recovery. Every trained bystander becomes a potential lifesaver. The science is clear, the timeline is unforgiving, and the solution is remarkably simple: act immediately, compress the chest, and keep blood flowing until professional help arrives.