The global challenge of HIV/AIDS remains one of the most pressing public health issues today. According to the latest data from UNAIDS, around 38.4 million people worldwide are living with HIV/AIDS, underlining the need for not only medical intervention but also comprehensive awareness, education, and social change. Despite the significant strides made in treatment and prevention, the confusion surrounding the relationship between HIV and AIDS still persists.

Young people have become influential advocates in the fight against HIV/AIDS. Research from UNICEF shows that youth-led initiatives can lower HIV transmission rates by as much as 45% in targeted communities. These young activists utilize digital platforms and peer-to-peer education to dispel myths, promote safe practices, and foster supportive environments for those affected by HIV/AIDS.

Dr Gowri Kulkarni, an expert in Internal Medicine, explains that while the terms HIV and AIDS are often used interchangeably, they are distinctly different. "HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) is a virus that attacks the immune system, whereas AIDS (Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome) is a condition that occurs when HIV severely damages the immune system," she clarifies. To understand the implications of these differences, it's important to explore the fundamental distinctions between the two.

1. HIV is a Virus; AIDS is a Syndrome

HIV is the virus responsible for attacking the body’s immune system, specifically targeting CD4 cells, which are crucial for the body’s defense against infections. As HIV progresses, it destroys these cells, weakening the immune system over time. If left untreated, this continuous damage can lead to AIDS.

AIDS, on the other hand, is a syndrome, not a virus. Dr Kulkarni further elaborates that AIDS is a collection of symptoms and illnesses that emerge when the immune system is severely compromised due to prolonged HIV infection. It represents the most advanced stage of HIV, and is characterized by very low CD4 counts or the onset of opportunistic infections like tuberculosis, pneumonia, or certain cancers.

2. Not Everyone with HIV Develops AIDS

A key distinction to remember is that not everyone with HIV will progress to AIDS. Thanks to advancements in medicine, particularly antiretroviral therapy (ART), individuals living with HIV can manage the virus and maintain a healthy immune system for many years, or even decades, without ever developing AIDS. ART works by suppressing the virus to undetectable levels, effectively preventing the damage HIV would otherwise cause to the immune system.

Without treatment, however, HIV progresses through three stages:

- Acute HIV Infection: This stage occurs shortly after transmission and may include symptoms like fever, fatigue, and swollen lymph nodes.

- Chronic HIV Infection: Often asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic, the virus continues to damage the immune system but at a slower rate.

- AIDS: This is the final stage, marked by severe immune damage and the presence of infections that take advantage of the compromised immune defenses.

3. HIV is Transmissible; AIDS is Not

Another key distinction between HIV and AIDS is the way in which they are transmitted. HIV is highly contagious and can be transmitted through the exchange of bodily fluids such as blood, semen, vaginal fluids, and breast milk. It is primarily spread through unprotected sexual contact, sharing needles, or from mother to child during childbirth or breastfeeding.

AIDS, however, is not transmissible. It is not a disease that can be passed from one person to another. Rather, AIDS is the result of untreated, advanced HIV infection and is a direct consequence of the virus’s damage to the immune system.

4. Diagnosis Methods Differ

HIV and AIDS are diagnosed through different methods. HIV is diagnosed through blood tests or oral swabs that detect the presence of the virus or antibodies produced by the immune system in response to the virus. Early detection of HIV is crucial, as it allows for timely intervention and treatment, which can prevent the virus from progressing to AIDS.

AIDS, on the other hand, is diagnosed using more specific criteria. Dr Kulkarni notes that the diagnosis of AIDS is made when the individual’s CD4 cell count falls below 200 cells/mm³, or when opportunistic infections or certain cancers (such as Kaposi's sarcoma or lymphoma) are detected. Diagnosing AIDS involves a more thorough assessment of the individual’s immune function and overall health, as opposed to just the detection of HIV.

5. Treatment Goals Are Different

The treatment goals for HIV and AIDS differ significantly, although both involve antiretroviral therapy (ART). For HIV, the primary treatment goal is to suppress the virus to undetectable levels, thus maintaining a strong immune system and preventing further transmission of the virus. People living with HIV can often live long, healthy lives if they adhere to ART.

For individuals diagnosed with AIDS, the treatment plan becomes more complex. While ART remains an essential part of managing the virus, treatment for AIDS also focuses on addressing the opportunistic infections and secondary health complications associated with severe immune suppression. The goal of treatment for AIDS is not only to manage the HIV virus but also to improve the quality of life and extend survival by treating these secondary health issues.

Role of Community Engagement in Combatting HIV/AIDS

While the medical community has made great strides in managing HIV, the battle to curb its transmission is also a social and cultural issue. Dr Daman Ahuja, a public health expert, highlights that HIV/AIDS awareness and education are vital to reducing transmission rates and supporting those affected by the virus. "Young people, especially, have become key advocates in the fight against HIV/AIDS," says Dr Ahuja. "Research from UNICEF shows that youth-led initiatives can lower HIV transmission rates by as much as 45% in targeted communities."

Additionally, grassroots activism plays a significant role in raising awareness and addressing stigma. As the World Health Organization reports, community-based interventions have been proven to increase HIV testing rates and improve treatment adherence, which are crucial in the fight against the pandemic.

The ultimate goal of organizations like UNAIDS is to eliminate the HIV/AIDS pandemic by 2030. Achieving this requires global collaboration, from medical treatment advancements to public health strategies, education, and advocacy. Dr Kulkarni’s insight underscores the importance of early detection, treatment adherence, and community support in the fight against HIV/AIDS.

Dr Gowri Kulkarni is Head of Medical Operations at MediBuddy and Dr Daman Ahuja, a public health expert and has been associated with Red Ribbon Express Project of NACO between 2007-12.

You can feel fine and still have a heart that is slowly changing. Researchers at Imperial College London and the MRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences say millions of people could be living with hidden inflammation that does exactly that. They say the changes can start years before any symptoms show up.

"Our study, which is the largest of its kind, suggests that millions of people could be living with hidden inflammation, which is slowly changing their heart and causing long-term damage," said Professor Declan O'Regan, British Heart Foundation Chair of Cardiovascular AI at Imperial College London.

What The Study Found

The study was published in the European Journal of Preventive Cardiology. The team looked at data from nearly 480,000 adults in the UK Biobank, a large health database, Imperial says. They measured a blood marker called glycoprotein acetyls, or GlycA for short, which the paper uses to measure chronic inflammation. They also used heart scans and genetic data.

People with the highest levels of inflammation, the top 20%, had a 43% higher risk of heart attack and stroke than those with the lowest levels, the bottom 20%, according to Imperial.

Imperial adds that higher levels also went with changes in the heart itself. These included thicker heart walls, smaller heart chambers and poorer filling of the heart. The researchers say such changes can build quietly for years before possibly leading to heart failure.

Read More: Childhood Vaccine Rates Decline Across Europe, Lancet Study Finds

Where The Inflammation Comes From

Chronic inflammation is a long-term, low-level activation of the immune system, Imperial explains. It has been linked to cancer and diabetes, and is increasingly seen as a driver of heart disease.

According to Imperial, higher inflammation was strongly linked to poorer social and economic circumstances and to mental distress, as well as to smoking and excess body fat.

"The surprising thing was how much social factors and mental health are linked to inflammation and damage to the heart, as well as more well-known risk factors like smoking and inactivity," O'Regan said. He added that there was also a strong genetic factor, "with some people being naturally more resilient or susceptible to the inflammatory damage that comes from different lifestyles."

What Could Come Next

The study named proteins from the interleukin-1 and TNF families as likely drivers of the damage, Imperial says. Several are already targeted by drugs in clinical trials, which Imperial says raises hopes that anti-inflammatory treatments could help prevent heart disease before symptoms begin. The researchers say combining inflammation blood tests with genetic risk scores could help find the people who would benefit most from early action.

There is earlier proof that this idea can work. In the 2017 Canakinumab Anti-inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study, or CANTOS trial for short, led by Paul Ridker and published in the New England Journal of Medicine, 10,061 people who had already had a heart attack, and had high inflammation, were given canakinumab or a placebo. The paper concluded that at the 150 mg dose, given every three months, canakinumab led to fewer repeat cardiovascular events than the placebo, independent of any drop in cholesterol. But those were heart attack survivors, not people without symptoms.

What to keep in mind

The study reports links, and the researchers describe inflammation as one possible pathway to heart damage. They also stress that being genetically susceptible, or living in hard circumstances, does not mean a person will develop heart disease, and that much can be done to prevent long-term inflammation.

A few floaters, a brief flash of light or mild blurring across your vision may seem harmless at first. But when these changes appear suddenly without any probable cause, they may signal a bigger problem. On World Retina Day, experts explain when your retina needs urgent medical attention.

The retina is the light-sensitive layer at the back of the eye, which plays a crucial role in maintaining healthy eyesight. Some retinal conditions may develop without obvious symptoms in early stages, while others can present suddenly and threaten your eyesight if treatment is delayed.

“Retinal health is fundamental to maintaining clear vision and preserving quality of life, yet many retinal conditions can develop silently, without obvious warning signs in their early stages,” Dr Rajesh Kapoor, Medical Director, Suruchi Eye Hospital, Navi Mumbai told HealthandMe.

“By the time a person begins to notice blurred or distorted vision, dark spots, flashes, floaters, or other visual changes, the condition may already require urgent medical attention. This is why we need to shift our approach from waiting for symptoms to prioritizing awareness, regular comprehensive eye examinations and timely consultation with an ophthalmologist.”

What Are Floaters And Flashes?

Floaters can look like tiny dots, lines, specks or cobweb-like shapes moving across your field of vision. They are easier to notice when looking at a bright background.

Flashes, on the other hand, can look like brief streaks or bursts of light. They may occur even when there is no actual source of light around you.

Occasional floaters can occur for reasons that are not always serious. However, a sudden increase in floaters or the sudden appearance of flashes should not be dismissed, especially if there are other changes in vision. One of the conditions doctors want to rule out in such situations is retinal detachment.

Also read: Ferritin Face: Can Pale Skin Signal Iron Deficiency?

What Is Retinal Detachment?

“Retinal detachment is a serious condition which requires urgent medical attention and occurs when the retina, the light sensitive layer at the back of the eye pulls away from its normal position,” Dr Mudit Tyagi, Scientific Chair, VRSI and Head, Smt Kanuri Santhamma Center for VitreoRetinal Diseases, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad told HealthandMe.

There are several possible causes of retinal detachment. According to Dr. Tyagi, they include injury to the eye, high myopia and certain eye diseases.

When the retina separates from its normal position, its ability to function properly can be affected. The longer the condition remains untreated, the greater the concern about permanent vision loss.

Sudden Flashes And A Curtain Or Shadow Over Your Vision

The symptoms of retinal detachment can vary, but certain changes should warrant immediate medical attention.

A dark curtain or shadow across the field of vision is concerning because it can represent a portion of the visual field being lost.

Dr. Tyagi said, “The urgency of recognising retinal detachment can’t be overstated. If you have sudden flashes of light, a dramatic increase in floaters, or a dark shadow or curtain across your field of vision, don’t ignore it, even if there is no pain.”

The absence of pain should not be misconstrued as a non-emergency. A retinal problem can occur without the kind of discomfort people usually associate with an eye emergency.

Also read: The 5 Climate-Related Eye Risks Every Indian Should Know

Timing Is Key

Retinal detachment is not a condition where it is advisable to wait and see whether symptoms settle on their own. “Retinal detachments, if detected in time and operated early enough can result in a good recovery of vision,” Dr Tyagi said.

He added, “It is important, therefore, to be vigilant and see an eye care specialist as early treatment can help avoid preventable loss of vision. So, timely recognition and diagnosis followed by right treatment can help save vision.”

This is why sudden visual changes deserve attention even if they seem minor initially.

Who Is At Risk?

Some people may need to be particularly proactive about retinal health. Dr. Kapoor said individuals with diabetes, increasing age, a family history of retinal disease or other risk factors that may affect retinal health should be more careful and alert.

Diabetes can affect the blood vessels supplying the retina and lead to diabetic retinal disease. Regular eye examinations can help identify changes before vision is significantly affected. Dr Kapoor also stressed that screening should not necessarily wait until symptoms appear.

“Advances in retinal imaging, diagnostics and treatment today provide ophthalmologists with valuable opportunities to identify and manage several retinal conditions at an earlier stage. However, technology can make its greatest impact when people seek eye care at the right time.”

A sudden change in vision does not automatically mean that a person has retinal detachment. But because some retinal conditions can progress rapidly, it is important to have sudden symptoms assessed rather than trying to determine their cause on your own.

Dr Kapoor said: “Through greater public awareness and proactive screening, we can encourage people to take retinal health more seriously. Protecting sight begins with understanding that healthy vision should never be taken for granted—because when it comes to the retina, we should not wait for a problem to become noticeable before taking action.”

After surgery, radiotherapy could significantly decrease the chances of an atypical meningioma returning, according to a new international phase 3 trial published in The Lancet.

The findings come from the ROAM/EORTC-1308 trial, the first randomised controlled trial to directly test whether patients with a completely removed atypical meningioma benefit from receiving radiotherapy or whether regular scans and observation are enough.

The results could help settle a treatment question that has remained uncertain for years.

What Is An Atypical Meningioma?

Meningiomas are the most common brain tumours in adults. They develop from the meninges, the protective membranes surrounding the brain, and spinal cord.

An atypical meningioma is classified as a WHO grade 2 tumour. Unlike grade 1 meningiomas, that generally grow slowly, grade 2 tumours are more likely to grow again after surgery.

Even when surgeons manage to remove the entire visible tumour, microscopic tumour cells may remain, sparking a risk of recurrence.

Also read: The Gynecological Cancer Symptoms Women Often Mistake for “Normal” Ageing Like

What Did The Lancet Study Find?

The ROAM/EORTC-1308 trial enrolled 157 patients whose atypical meningiomas had been completely removed surgically. They were randomly assigned to either:

• Radiotherapy: 78 patients received 30 sessions of radiotherapy
• Observation: 79 patients underwent regular imaging surveillance

After a median follow-up of about five years, the difference in recurrence was significant. 14% of patients in the radiotherapy group experienced a recurrence, compared to 30% in the observation group. In other words, the risk of recurrence was reduced by nearly half with postoperative radiotherapy.

Additionally, at five years, about 80% of patients receiving radiotherapy remained free of recurrence, compared to about 64% of those who were monitored without immediate radiotherapy.

Also read: After 70% of His Tongue Was Removed For Cancer, Lawyer Regains Speech & Returns To Court

The Trial Cements Necessary Evidence

Until now, doctors have had to weigh two approaches after complete surgical removal of an atypical meningioma.

One option is to give radiotherapy immediately, hoping to destroy microscopic tumour cells that surgery may have missed. The other is to monitor the patient with regular brain scans and use radiotherapy if the tumour returns.

The uncertainty existed as strong randomised evidence showing whether immediate radiotherapy actually reduced recurrence had been lacking. The trial helps cement that evidence.

Who Needs Radiotherapy After Surgery?

The researchers say that treatment decisions still need to be made jointly by doctors and patients, taking into account possible side effects and the long-term consequences of radiation treatment. Serious radiation-related complications were uncommon in the trial.

The study also did not establish whether the recurrence benefit extends beyond five years. This means that longer follow-up will be needed to gather more evidence. According to the researchers, the findings are expected to shape national and international treatment guidelines.

The options may extend for patients who have undergone complete removal of a WHO grade 2 atypical meningioma. Rather than contemplating “Should we simply watch and wait?”, they can consider moving to a more evidence-based discussion about whether postoperative radiotherapy should be offered upfront.