The global challenge of HIV/AIDS remains one of the most pressing public health issues today. According to the latest data from UNAIDS, around 38.4 million people worldwide are living with HIV/AIDS, underlining the need for not only medical intervention but also comprehensive awareness, education, and social change. Despite the significant strides made in treatment and prevention, the confusion surrounding the relationship between HIV and AIDS still persists.

Young people have become influential advocates in the fight against HIV/AIDS. Research from UNICEF shows that youth-led initiatives can lower HIV transmission rates by as much as 45% in targeted communities. These young activists utilize digital platforms and peer-to-peer education to dispel myths, promote safe practices, and foster supportive environments for those affected by HIV/AIDS.

Dr Gowri Kulkarni, an expert in Internal Medicine, explains that while the terms HIV and AIDS are often used interchangeably, they are distinctly different. "HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) is a virus that attacks the immune system, whereas AIDS (Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome) is a condition that occurs when HIV severely damages the immune system," she clarifies. To understand the implications of these differences, it's important to explore the fundamental distinctions between the two.

1. HIV is a Virus; AIDS is a Syndrome

HIV is the virus responsible for attacking the body’s immune system, specifically targeting CD4 cells, which are crucial for the body’s defense against infections. As HIV progresses, it destroys these cells, weakening the immune system over time. If left untreated, this continuous damage can lead to AIDS.

AIDS, on the other hand, is a syndrome, not a virus. Dr Kulkarni further elaborates that AIDS is a collection of symptoms and illnesses that emerge when the immune system is severely compromised due to prolonged HIV infection. It represents the most advanced stage of HIV, and is characterized by very low CD4 counts or the onset of opportunistic infections like tuberculosis, pneumonia, or certain cancers.

2. Not Everyone with HIV Develops AIDS

A key distinction to remember is that not everyone with HIV will progress to AIDS. Thanks to advancements in medicine, particularly antiretroviral therapy (ART), individuals living with HIV can manage the virus and maintain a healthy immune system for many years, or even decades, without ever developing AIDS. ART works by suppressing the virus to undetectable levels, effectively preventing the damage HIV would otherwise cause to the immune system.

Without treatment, however, HIV progresses through three stages:

- Acute HIV Infection: This stage occurs shortly after transmission and may include symptoms like fever, fatigue, and swollen lymph nodes.

- Chronic HIV Infection: Often asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic, the virus continues to damage the immune system but at a slower rate.

- AIDS: This is the final stage, marked by severe immune damage and the presence of infections that take advantage of the compromised immune defenses.

3. HIV is Transmissible; AIDS is Not

Another key distinction between HIV and AIDS is the way in which they are transmitted. HIV is highly contagious and can be transmitted through the exchange of bodily fluids such as blood, semen, vaginal fluids, and breast milk. It is primarily spread through unprotected sexual contact, sharing needles, or from mother to child during childbirth or breastfeeding.

AIDS, however, is not transmissible. It is not a disease that can be passed from one person to another. Rather, AIDS is the result of untreated, advanced HIV infection and is a direct consequence of the virus’s damage to the immune system.

4. Diagnosis Methods Differ

HIV and AIDS are diagnosed through different methods. HIV is diagnosed through blood tests or oral swabs that detect the presence of the virus or antibodies produced by the immune system in response to the virus. Early detection of HIV is crucial, as it allows for timely intervention and treatment, which can prevent the virus from progressing to AIDS.

AIDS, on the other hand, is diagnosed using more specific criteria. Dr Kulkarni notes that the diagnosis of AIDS is made when the individual’s CD4 cell count falls below 200 cells/mm³, or when opportunistic infections or certain cancers (such as Kaposi's sarcoma or lymphoma) are detected. Diagnosing AIDS involves a more thorough assessment of the individual’s immune function and overall health, as opposed to just the detection of HIV.

5. Treatment Goals Are Different

The treatment goals for HIV and AIDS differ significantly, although both involve antiretroviral therapy (ART). For HIV, the primary treatment goal is to suppress the virus to undetectable levels, thus maintaining a strong immune system and preventing further transmission of the virus. People living with HIV can often live long, healthy lives if they adhere to ART.

For individuals diagnosed with AIDS, the treatment plan becomes more complex. While ART remains an essential part of managing the virus, treatment for AIDS also focuses on addressing the opportunistic infections and secondary health complications associated with severe immune suppression. The goal of treatment for AIDS is not only to manage the HIV virus but also to improve the quality of life and extend survival by treating these secondary health issues.

Role of Community Engagement in Combatting HIV/AIDS

While the medical community has made great strides in managing HIV, the battle to curb its transmission is also a social and cultural issue. Dr Daman Ahuja, a public health expert, highlights that HIV/AIDS awareness and education are vital to reducing transmission rates and supporting those affected by the virus. "Young people, especially, have become key advocates in the fight against HIV/AIDS," says Dr Ahuja. "Research from UNICEF shows that youth-led initiatives can lower HIV transmission rates by as much as 45% in targeted communities."

Additionally, grassroots activism plays a significant role in raising awareness and addressing stigma. As the World Health Organization reports, community-based interventions have been proven to increase HIV testing rates and improve treatment adherence, which are crucial in the fight against the pandemic.

The ultimate goal of organizations like UNAIDS is to eliminate the HIV/AIDS pandemic by 2030. Achieving this requires global collaboration, from medical treatment advancements to public health strategies, education, and advocacy. Dr Kulkarni’s insight underscores the importance of early detection, treatment adherence, and community support in the fight against HIV/AIDS.

Dr Gowri Kulkarni is Head of Medical Operations at MediBuddy and Dr Daman Ahuja, a public health expert and has been associated with Red Ribbon Express Project of NACO between 2007-12.

The bulge that appears when an internal organ pushes through a weakened muscle wall will not recede with rest or medication—it will, in most cases, grow larger and more uncomfortable over time. Surgery is the only definitive treatment. What has changed significantly in recent years is what that surgery looks like and what recovery from it requires.

Dr Rajesh Sharma, Director – General Surgery, Minimal Access & Bariatric Surgery, CK Birla Hospitals, Jaipur, in an interview with Health and Me, spoke about the introduction of robotics in hernia treatment and how it can benefit patients.

How hernia surgeries are becoming less painful

With advances in surgical technology, minimally invasive approaches have significantly improved patient outcomes. One of the most important developments in recent years is robotic-assisted hernia surgery using the da Vinci Surgical System. In robotic surgery, the surgeon operates from a console equipped with a high-definition, three-dimensional, magnified view of the surgical field. The robotic system translates the surgeon’s hand movements into extremely precise movements of miniaturised instruments inserted through small incisions. The system also filters natural hand tremors and provides a greater range of motion than the human wrist, enabling meticulous dissection and suturing.

For hernia repair, these capabilities allow surgeons to perform delicate steps such as accurate defect closure and optimal mesh placement, which are important for the long-term durability of the repair.

Benefits for patients

Robotic hernia repair offers several advantages for patients:

1. Smaller incisions and minimal scarring
2. Reduced postoperative pain
3. Lower risk of wound complications
4. Shorter hospital stay
5. Faster return to normal activities

Because the procedure is minimally invasive, most patients experience earlier mobilisation and quicker overall recovery compared with traditional open surgery. Robotic surgery is particularly useful in complex, recurrent, or large ventral hernias, where precise reconstruction of the abdominal wall is important. While not every hernia requires a robotic approach, the technology expands the surgeon’s ability to perform advanced minimally invasive repairs with improved ergonomics and visualisation.

The future of hernia surgery

The integration of robotic platforms such as the da Vinci system represents a major step forward in modern general surgery. By combining surgical precision with minimally invasive techniques, robotic hernia repair aims to enhance patient comfort, improve recovery, and deliver durable surgical outcomes.

The liver and heart are two of the most vital organs of the body, and although they perform very different functions, they are closely connected. When the liver is not functioning properly, it can place significant stress on the heart and circulatory system of the body.

Liver disease not only affects the digestion process, metabolism, and detoxification but can also trigger serious cardiovascular changes that may go unnoticed in the early stages. Understanding this particular connection is significant for timely diagnosis and better overall care.

The Liver-Heart Connection

The liver helps to regulate the flow of blood, fluid balance, cholesterol metabolism, and inflammation as well. When liver disease develops—whether due to fatty liver, hepatitis, cirrhosis, or alcohol-related damage—all these processes become disturbed.

As a result of the same, the heart may have to work harder to maintain circulation, while blood vessels may also undergo certain changes that impact blood pressure and delivery of oxygen as well.

Changes In Blood Circulation

In well-advanced liver disease, especially cirrhosis, the flow of blood through the liver becomes restricted. This can also increase pressure in the portal vein, a condition known as portal hypertension. At the same point in time, blood vessels in the rest of the body may also widen, causing a drop in effective blood pressure.

To compensate, the heart pumps faster and harder. With the passage of time, this constant strain can weaken cardiac function and even lead to a condition sometimes referred to as cirrhotic cardiomyopathy, where the heart does not respond normally under stress.

Fluid Retention And Heart Stress

Liver disease often causes the body to retain both salt and water. This can also lead to swelling in the legs, abdomen, and surrounding tissues as well. Extra fluid in the body increases the workload on the heart, making it more difficult for it to pump blood in an efficient way. In severe cases, this may also contribute to shortness of breath, fatigue, and worsening cardiovascular strain.

Inflammation And Metabolic Impact

Some of the conditions, such as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, are also linked with diabetes, obesity, high levels of cholesterol, and high blood pressure – all of which are the major risk factors for heart disease. Chronic inflammation, well-associated with liver damage, may further increase the risk of atherosclerosis and other cardiac complications.

GLP-1 receptor agonist drugs such as Ozempic and Wegovy have shown significant benefits for people with diabetes and obesity. However, not everyone experiences the same results.

Now, a study suggests that this variation may be due to genetic resistance, which means that some people are biologically less responsive to these medications, making these drugs less effective.

Also Read: NAFLD to MASLD: Experts Explain Why This Common Yet Dangerous Liver Condition Got Renamed

The new study by scientists at Stanford University in the US showed that about 10 per cent of the general population carry genetic variants that lead to what the researchers called “GLP-1 resistance”.

The GLP-1- receptor agonist drugs typically work by mimicking the hormone GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1), which naturally helps regulate blood sugar by stimulating insulin release. The process slows the emptying of the stomach and reduces appetite.

However, in individuals with certain genetic variants, the team found that higher levels of GLP-1 did not regulate blood sugar better.

The researchers noted that the findings, published in the journal Genome Medicine, may be key to developing new therapies for people with GLP-1 resistance.

“There are a whole class of medications that are insulin sensitizers, so perhaps we can develop medications that will allow people to be sensitized to GLP-1s or find formulations of GLP-1, like the longer-acting versions, that avoid the GLP-1 resistance,” said Anna Gloyn, professor of pediatrics and of genetics at Stanford Medicine.

The Gene Linked to GLP-1 Resistance

Also read: Foundayo: US FDA Approves Eli Lilly’s GLP-1 Weight Loss Pill

To zero in on the gene resistant to GLP-1 drugs, the team conducted experiments in humans. They traced this resistance to a PAM variant known as p.S539W.

PAM (peptidyl-glycine alpha-amidating monooxygenase) is an enzyme that is uniquely capable of activating many hormones in the body, including GLP-1.

While the researchers suspected that people with the PAM variant would have lower levels of GLP-1 in their blood, it actually increased levels of GLP-1. Although the exact mechanism is still unclear, experiments in both humans and mice confirmed signs of reduced response to GLP-1.

Analyzing diabetes drug trial data, they found that individuals with these variants were less able to lower their blood sugar levels even after six months of treatment. This suggests that despite having more circulating GLP-1, their bodies are less responsive to it.

“When I treat patients in the diabetes clinic, I see a huge variation in response to these GLP-1-based medications and it is difficult to predict this response clinically,” said Mahesh Umapathysivam, an endocrinologist and clinical researcher at Adelaide University in Australia.

“This is the first step in being able to use someone’s genetic make-up to help us improve that decision-making process,” he added.

Also read: Can Weight Loss Jabs Surge Divorce Rates? What Experts Are Saying

Importantly, participants with the PAM variants did not respond differently to other common diabetes treatments, including sulfonylureas, metformin, and DPP-4i.

The finding may help develop precision medicine, the researchers said. Knowing ahead of time who is likely to respond would help patients get on the right drugs faster, Gloyn said.

Reasons Why Ozempic May Not Help All People Lose Weight

Ozempic is primarily indicated for type 2 diabetes management. But some doctors may prescribe it for weight loss in appropriate patients without diabetes.

Previous research has shown that medical conditions such as sleep apnea, along with certain common medications, such as antidepressants, steroids, and contraceptives, can hamper the process of shedding extra pounds.

Another major reason that can hamper weight loss is the side-effects of these drugs that can prompt a person to halt their prescription mid-way.