Eating Restaurant Foods Carefully (Credit-Canva)
Dining out is a popular pastime, but it's essential to be aware of potential food safety risks. We all have our go to foods whenever we are at a restaurant and enjoy the prospect of getting to eat their favorite meal. But even in the most high-end restaurants, the risk of getting sick always lingers. You never know when or what may cause issues for you
Food poisoning is a common problem that can lead to things like nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, and stomach upset. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that about 48 million people in the United States get sick from food poisoning each year. While sometimes it is unavoidable, being aware of these things can help you understand things that can go wrong and taking precautions when eating at restaurants. It's crucial to be informed to protect your health and enjoy your dining experience without worry. Here are some foods you should either avoid or be careful while eating.
Even eggs that look fine can have Salmonella bacteria. These bacteria can make you sick with stomach cramps, diarrhea, fever, and vomiting. Restaurants can cause outbreaks if they don't cook eggs to 160 degrees Fahrenheit, store them at the wrong temperature, use unpasteurized eggs, or use dirty cooking tools. These bad practices let bacteria grow and make people sick. So, it's important to cook and handle eggs the right way.
Melons that are cut up ahead of time, like in fruit salads, are more likely to cause food poisoning. When you cut a melon, bacteria on the outside can get to the inside. If lots of fruit is cut in one place, it's easier for bacteria to spread. Since people eat melons raw, there's no cooking to kill the germs. These germs, like Listeria, Salmonella, or E. coli, can make you really sick. So, be careful with pre-cut melons.
Sprouts are healthy, but they grow in warm, wet places where bacteria like Listeria like to live. Even washing sprouts doesn't always get rid of these germs. And because people usually eat sprouts raw, there's no cooking to kill the bacteria. This makes sprouts a big cause of food poisoning. There have been lots of outbreaks linked to sprouts, with many people getting sick and even ending up in the hospital. So, it's a good idea to avoid sprouts, especially at restaurants.
Meat that isn't cooked enough can have harmful bacteria like Salmonella, E. coli, and Campylobacter. Campylobacter is a common cause of diarrhea. Ground beef is extra risky because it's often made from meat from many different cows. If one cow is sick, all the ground beef can be contaminated. While quickly cooking the outside of a steak can kill surface germs, undercooked ground beef and other meats are still dangerous. Cooking meat all the way through is super important.
Some fish can cause specific kinds of food poisoning. Ciguatera poisoning happens when you eat fish that ate poisonous algae, like grouper, sea bass, and red snapper. Cooking doesn't get rid of these poisons. Scombroid poisoning can happen if fish like tuna, sardines, and mahi-mahi aren't stored correctly, which lets bacteria make poisons. Cooking doesn't help with this either. It's important for restaurants to get their fish from good places and keep it stored at the right temperature.
Oysters filter water, which means they can collect bacteria and viruses. A big risk is vibriosis, which is caused by Vibrio bacteria that live in warm ocean water where oysters grow. Eating raw or undercooked oysters is very risky. These bacteria can cause serious sickness, and sometimes even infections in the blood. Cooking oysters completely to at least 145 degrees Fahrenheit makes them much safer. So, cooked oysters are a better choice.
Greens like lettuce and spinach can get contaminated with bacteria from things like dirty water, animal poop, and not handling them correctly. Even washing them might not get rid of all the germs, especially if they're inside the leaves. Bacteria can grow fast on greens that are wilted or slimy. Restaurants need to get their greens from good farms, wash them really well, and store them correctly. Choosing fresh, crispy greens helps reduce the risk.
Buffets have a higher chance of food poisoning for a few reasons. Many people use the same serving spoons, which spreads germs. Food can sit out for too long at the wrong temperature, letting bacteria grow. Also, people might cough or sneeze near the food. Common germs at buffets include bacteria like E. coli, Salmonella, and Listeria, and viruses like norovirus. Restaurants need to check food temperatures, change serving spoons often, and make sure everyone is washing their hands.
Credit: iStock
Menopause is a natural stage of aging that ends menstruation and reproductive function. It usually occurs between ages 45 and 55.
But growing interest in extending the reproductive years has raised a question: Can menopause be delayed, and would doing so actually benefit women's health?
Longevity influencer Kayla Barnes-Lentz, in her mid-30s, recently told Business Insider that she is trying to delay menopause until 60 using lifestyle changes and experimental treatments.
Scientists are studying ways to slow ovarian aging, including ovarian tissue freezing and drugs such as rapamycin.
Early human research suggests rapamycin may slow ovarian aging by around 20%. However, evidence remains limited, and the drug is not FDA-approved for delaying menopause. Its use for this purpose is off-label.
The 2024 Research by Dr. Kutluk Oktay at Yale School of Medicine has also explored whether menopause could eventually be postponed or prevented by preserving ovarian function.
But delaying menopause is not necessarily an all-round health benefit. Longer estrogen exposure may support bone, heart and brain health, while potentially increasing the risk of some hormone-sensitive cancers.
Also read: ‘I Was Vocal About Cancer But Silent About Menopause Out Of Shame’, Says Actress Lisa Ray
Menopause around age 45 or younger can affect several aspects of health as estrogen levels fall.
Is Later Menopause Healthier?
Menopause at 55 or older means longer exposure to estrogen and has been associated with some benefits, including better bone and cardiovascular health.
But the picture is not straightforward. Longer estrogen exposure has also been linked to a higher risk of breast, endometrial and ovarian cancers. So, later menopause should not automatically be considered healthier.
No. Hormone replacement therapy treats menopause symptoms but does not stop or postpone menopause.
It can help with hot flashes, sleep problems and vaginal dryness and may benefit some women at risk of bone loss. HRT can contain estrogen alone or estrogen with progesterone.
Its risks and benefits depend on factors such as age, timing, formulation, dose and duration. For appropriate women, the benefit-risk balance is generally more favorable when treatment begins before age 60 or within 10 years of menopause.
Genetics play a major role in determining when menopause occurs, and there is no lifestyle change proven to reliably postpone it.
Some factors have been linked with later menopause or a lower risk of early menopause:
These habits cannot guarantee a later menopause but can support overall health through midlife.
For now, treatments specifically designed to delay natural menopause remain experimental. There is no established method that can reliably and safely postpone menopause in healthy women.
Credit: iStock
The suspected plague situation in Russia has reportedly claimed another life, fueling fears of a potential outbreak. However, Russia has not confirmed that either death was caused by plague, and investigations into the cases are ongoing.
India, which has witnessed plague outbreaks in the past, including the 1994 Surat outbreak and a pneumonic plague outbreak in Himachal Pradesh in 2002, also has rodent populations that can serve as reservoirs for plague. But does the situation in Russia pose a risk to India if plague is eventually confirmed?
To understand the potential risk to India, HealthandMe spoke to two experts with experience investigating plague outbreaks in India.
Also read: Russia Plague Scare: Is Pneumonic Plague Deadlier Than Bubonic & Septicemic Plague?
The death of a 28-year-old laboratory worker in Russia’s Irkutsk region has raised concerns about possible plague exposure. Reports said she may have accidentally broken a test tube containing Yersinia pestis, the bacterium causing plague, while collecting samples. However, Russian authorities have not confirmed plague and said she died of pneumonia of unknown cause.
Dr NK Ganguly, former Director General of the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) told HealthandMe that the case has not been established as plague and questioned whether a test-tube exposure could explain plague pneumonia.
“Actually, the case in Russia has not been proven to be plague. It has been reported as a case of unknown cause and undiagnosed pneumonia. They have been investigating plague among about 2,000 people in the vicinity, as well as among people in the laboratory. So, they have not confirmed it as a plague case. And from a test tube exposure, it is difficult to have plague pneumonia.”
Unconfirmed reports have also claimed another death linked to the same laboratory, but this has not been independently verified.
Dr Ganguly was one of the people who investigated the 1994 plague outbreak in Maharashtra’s Beed district.
There is currently no indication that the situation in Russia poses a significant pandemic risk to India.
Dr Ganguly said there is no reason for India to be very concerned about the Russian situation, particularly because plague has not been confirmed.
“So from the Russian plague, there is no, we need not be very worried. Firstly, they have not reported it as plague. It might be plague, but they have not reported it as plague.”
The WHO has also assessed the risk to the wider population as low. WHO spokesperson Christian Lindmeier said the initial assessment based on available information put the risk at moderate to low for Irkutsk, low for Russia as a whole and very low for the WHO European Region.
Plague is caused by the bacterium Yersinia pestis and is primarily associated with rodents and their fleas. It can occur in different forms, including bubonic, septicemic and pneumonic plague. Russia is suspected to have pneumonic plague.
Dr Amitabh Banerjee, who investigated the Himachal Pradesh plague outbreak in 2002, said plague does not typically spread rapidly from person to person.
“So it's not a very quick transmission, particularly person to person. But plague is a disease which cannot be eradicated because it is in wildlife, it is in rodents and all. So the only thing is hygiene and, with modern antibiotics, there should not be any panic,” he told HealthandMe.
Banerjee also noted that pneumonic plague can be severe, while bubonic plague does not typically spread easily from person to person.
“So pneumonic plague can be very deadly particularly pneumonic plague and that will be localized pandemic it is not possible because those persons will be very sick, they cannot move out or not and bubonic plague will not transmit very easily from person to person and both are treatable…”
While Dr Ganguly said there is no immediate reason for India to be worried about the Russian situation, he stressed the importance of continued surveillance of rodents and other animals, particularly where wildlife and human habitation overlap.
“So the main thing is that go on doing surveillance in the rats and other, in the vicinity of where the forest and the human habitat march. And whenever you find any activity, then take preventive precaution.”
Credit: AI
Leaving Delhi for a city with cleaner air could be a health-smart decision as it can reduce your exposure to harmful pollutants. But just because you are away from the smog, it does not mean the health effects from years of inhaling polluted air will recover overnight.
That brings us to an important question. How long do lungs take to recover after living in an excessively polluted environment?
Air pollution, particularly fine particulate matter known as PM2.5, triggers inflammation and oxidative stress throughout the body. This can directly impact the lungs, heart, blood vessels and even the brain.
The World Health Organization says long-term exposure to air pollution increases the risk of serious disorders like heart disease, stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and lung cancer. That is why relocating could be beneficial without necessarily being a complete reset for the body.
Also read: Delhi Air Pollution Is Back: What Days Of Poor AQI Can Do to Your Lungs
The key difference to note here is between ongoing exposure and the damage that exposure may have contributed to. Once someone moves to a place with cleaner air, they are no longer receiving the same daily dose of pollutants. This can alleviate the ongoing inflammatory burden due to toxic air significantly.
But if years of exposure have contributed to changes in lung function, blood vessels or cardiovascular health, those effects may take much longer to recover, and some chronic disease may not even be completely reversible.
A recent study examining Delhi’s pollution between 2019 and 2023 found that PM2.5 levels exceeded India’s national daily standard on roughly 60% of measurements and the WHO daily guideline on almost all days.
Researchers also found that particles deposited deep in the lungs can be cleared much more slowly than larger particles, sometimes over weeks to years.
Also read: Children, Adults & Seniors: How Lung Health Risks Change Across Life Stages
PM2.5 particles are small enough to travel deep into the respiratory system. Some particles can reach the alveolar regions of the lungs, where clearance and recovery are slower. Constant exposure can also keep irritating the airways, worsening conditions like asthma and contributing to long-term respiratory disease.
WHO notes that short-term exposure can aggravate asthma and increase respiratory infections, while chronic exposure is associated with diseases such as COPD and lung cancer.
The consequences of air pollution on health are not just limited to breathing. PM2.5 can contribute to inflammation and oxidative stress, while some particles can enter into the bloodstream. This can affect blood vessels and the cardiovascular system.
Long-term exposure has also been associated with atherosclerosis, heart attacks and stroke, among other cardiovascular outcomes. The US Environmental Protection Agency says evidence links both short and long-term PM2.5 exposure with changes in heart and blood-vessel function and with cardiovascular disease.
Reducing exposure could be an excellent health intervention to start the recovery process. Once a person is no longer repeatedly exposed to high concentrations of PM2.5 and other pollutants, the body is no longer subjected to its active effects.
But recovery also depends on what has happened during the years of exposure. Temporary inflammation or irritation may improve after exposure falls, while structural changes or chronic diseases may persist for quite a while even after moving away.
It is therefore more accurate to think of relocation as reducing future exposure rather than expecting to escape pollution health effects scot-free.
Delhi’s pollution crisis is not confined to a few extremely bad winter days. Research analysed five years of AQI data and found persistently high PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations. It also found that pollution generally worsened during post-monsoon and winter months. Evening commuting periods also produced higher particulate deposition than morning periods.
© $2026 Times Horizon Private Limited