This digital era is all about catching up with trends, TikToks and reels, but at the cost of what? Many believe all of this happens at the cost of one's health and mental well-being. As a result, the grades of students, especially in high school, when they are exposed to social media the most, start to drop. However, a study based on the University of Birmingham's findings, peer-revied and published by the Lancet's journal for European health policy compared 1,277 students and the rules their 30 different secondary schools had for smartphone use at break and lunchtimes.` The study found something else, contrary to the popular belief.

What Did The Study Find?

The study found that banning phones in school is not linked to pupils getting higher grades or having a better mental wellbeing. The study found that a student's sleep, classroom behavior, exercise or how long they spend on their phones did not seem much different for schools with phone bans versus schools without it.

However, the study did find that spending longer time in social media or on smartphones in general may be linked to such measures. This was the first study in the world that looked at school phone rules along with the children's health and education.

In an interview to the BBC, Dr Victoria Goodyear, study's lead author said, that the findings are not against smartphone bans in school, but, a suggestion that bans in isolation are not enough to tackle the negative impacts.

The focus must be on reducing how much time the student spends on their phone, which cannot just be supervised in school.

How Was The Study Conducted?

The schools were chosen from a sample of 1,341 mainstream state schools in England. Among these the behavior of student form schools that banned the smartphones versus those who did not ban it were studied to find out that schools restricting smartphone use did not seem to see the intended improvements on health, wellbeing and focus of the student, as one would have wished to.

The study also used the internationally recognized Warwick-Edinburg Mental Well-Being Scale, a measure of mental well-being focusing entirely on positive aspects. It is a 14-item scale with 5 response categories. This method was used to determine the wellbeing of the children who participated in the research. It further looked at students' anxiety and depression levels.

It also asked from teachers about whether their students were on target, below target or above target in English and maths.

What Do The Students Feel?

When asked students, they said that the smartphone ban forces you to hang out and chat with your friends and some of them think in lower school, it has helped them spend less time scrolling social media and making lots of friends.

Experts point out that the important part is to help students learn to use their phone in a safe and controlled space. This way, phone-related issues, especially distraction, its impact on your mental health, will be much less. The answer is not ban, but the use of the smartphone in a controlled environment, so students learn to value the "freedom" they have been given to use them at break and lunch.

Post-viral syndromes are a classic example of the body not feeling better even after the viraemia is over. When a viral infection ends, most people expect life to quickly return to normal.

For many, it does, but for some, recovery stretches on for weeks or even months. This condition, often called a post-viral syndrome, is now being seen more clearly across the country, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, the main question that arises is why doesn’t recovery end when the infection is gone? The answer is that the body does not always ‘reset’ immediately.

Why Symptoms Continue After the Infection Clears?

During an infection, the body’s defense system becomes highly active to fight the virus. In some people, this response does not completely settle down even after the virus has been cleared. This can lead to ongoing tiredness, body aches, or a general feeling of being unwell. This could be due to the immune system remaining partially activated.

In certain cases, the body’s defense system may even start reacting in an unbalanced way, affecting normal tissues. This is why some people develop symptoms like joint pains, palpitations, or dizziness after a viral illness, even though tests may not show an active infection.

Another important reason is energy depletion. Viral infections can temporarily affect how the body produces and uses energy. As a result, even small physical or mental efforts can feel exhausting. Many patients describe a pattern where they feel better, try to return to normal activity, and then feel worse again. This cycle can delay full recovery. The nervous system can also be affected. Some people experience what is commonly called ‘brain fog’, poor sleep, or a sense of imbalance in heart rate and blood pressure. These symptoms are real and are part of the body’s recovery process.

POTS Syndrome

Also, there is something called POT (Positional Orthostatic Tachycardia) syndrome. Patients, when they get up and stand, develop mild giddiness and palpitations.

It is also important to understand that the body may take time to rebuild strength. Muscle loss, physical inactivity, and lack of appetite are common effects following an illness.

Why Recovery Should Not Be Rushed

Consequently, when an individual has recovered from the virus, it is more than just getting rid of the virus. It involves restoring and getting stronger over time. Most importantly, recovery should never be rushed. Pushing too hard or returning to high levels of activity too soon after becoming ill can lead to worsening of symptoms and therefore prolong the recovery time.

A more effective way to recover is by taking a gradual, steady approach. Recovery involves resting adequately, maintaining a nutritious diet, engaging in light exercise and receiving adequate amounts of sleep and at the same time being aware of how your body feels. Long-term symptoms are not in your head. They are part of the process of healing that occurs after some forms of infection.

Most people will recover, but patience and using proper methods are key to recovering completely. It is also important to understand that recovery involves rebuilding the strength that the body needs time to restore this balance.

It is important not to get carried away assuming post-viral syndrome, but consult a physician and not miss out on an underlying medical disorder, and investigate appropriately.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the commonest non-communicable disease in Indian women, with a prevalence rate of 35%. Globally, 30% of the population is suffering from NAFLD, and this projection is expected to progress to 56%, in a similar range to diabetes and obesity.

In India, the high rate of NAFLD is driven by the adoption of a westernized lifestyle, associated comorbidities like diabetes, obesity & hypertension. Fatty liver is known to progress to cirrhosis (end-stage liver disease) or liver cancer (hepatocellular cancer) if left untreated, which affects the survival rates and implicates a poor prognosis.

Unfortunately, it’s a silent disease and often presents at an advanced stage, leading to serious complications.

Why Women Face Different Risks Than Men

Women tend to have different outcomes with fatty liver disease when compared to men. Women may have a higher risk of life secondary to NAFLD when compared with men of the same age group. Conditions like age of menarche (first menstrual period), menopause status, alteration in reproductive hormones, and sarcopenia (muscle loss) may affect the development of NAFLD. Hormonal issues like oestrogen deficiency and Polycystic Ovarian Disease (PCOD) increase the risk of developing NAFLD. Women with type 2 diabetes, obesity, and larger waist circumference (metabolic syndrome) are more prone to NAFLD.

Besides physiological and hormonal factors, there are social and cultural factors like limited autonomy for women, hierarchy based on earning potential, and poor literacy levels (especially in rural regions), which may create health neglect or gender bias towards women’s health, and conditions like NAFLD can go neglected or ignored.

Fatty Liver Disease Is Preventable and Reversible

The urban populace has its own share of modern problems like alcohol, smoking, and a sedentary lifestyle. Fatty liver is totally preventable and reversible if diagnosed at an early stage with simple lifestyle modifications. Studies show that a diet high in protein and low in carbohydrates, or a diet with fruits and vegetables and whole grains combined with exercise for 30 minutes a day and 5 days a week, can significantly reverse fatty liver and liver cell inflammation.

There are no gender-based guidelines to treat or prevent this problem. In general, reducing the cardiovascular and metabolic risk remains the cornerstone to treat NAFLD in both men and women.

Weight Loss Can Significantly Improve Liver Health

Research shows that up to 10% weight loss can reduce liver scarring and inflammation, whereas between 5-10% weight loss can reduce liver fat significantly.

There is some evidence that suggests black coffee (without sugar), Vitamin E, and Omega-3 fatty acids help prevent and reverse NAFLD. Specific and early consultation with a specialist (e.g. cardiologist, endocrinologist, or a gynecologist) can control the morbidity and mortality around the problem. Fatty liver has reached an epidemic level problem and therefore needs mass screening & awareness programs.

Early Diagnosis Is the Key

Early diagnosis is key and can be achieved by simple USG of the liver or Fibro scan combined with simple blood tests, liver LFT’s (liver function tests). Unfortunately, there’s no pill to replace exercise or a healthy lifestyle; otherwise, it would have been a blockbuster medicine.

However, the good news is this deadly and silent disease has a simple and inexpensive solution: a healthy diet and plenty of exercise, which is accessible to all. There is also an urgent need to increase awareness in women on NAFLD and ways to combat it, so they can get access to life-saving treatment at the earliest.

For decades, thalassemia has been synonymous with lifelong blood transfusions, frequent hospital visits, and the persistent risk of iron overload. For patients and families, it has largely meant managing a chronic condition rather than truly treating it. That narrative, however, is beginning to change.

The recent approval of oral drugs for thalassemia by the US Food and Drug Administration marks a historic milestone. These oral, disease-modifying pyruvate kinase activators improve anemia in adults with non-transfusion-dependent (NTDT) and transfusion-dependent (TDT) \(\alpha\)- or \(\beta\)-thalassemia. For now, they are approved in the US and Saudi Arabia for adults with thalassemia, with European review ongoing.

It is offering a fundamentally different approach, one that targets the disease at its biological core rather than simply managing its complications. Yet, as this new era unfolds, a critical question remains: are patients being diagnosed early enough to benefit from it?

A shift from supportive care to targeted therapy:

Until recently, thalassemia management has depended heavily on blood transfusions and iron chelation therapy. While these interventions are life-saving, they do not correct the underlying defect in red blood cell production. Over time, repeated transfusions can lead to complications affecting vital organs such as the heart, liver, and endocrine system.

Oral drugs, however, work by activating pyruvate kinase in red blood cells, improving energy (ATP) production, and enhancing red cell survival. In simple terms, it helps the body produce more functional and longer-lasting red blood cells, leading to an increase in hemoglobin levels, reduced transfusion requirements, and improved quality of life, particularly with respect to fatigue, one of the most debilitating symptoms of the disease. Oral therapy working across a broader disease spectrum marks a significant advance.

India’s Hidden Burden

India bears one of the highest burdens of thalassemia globally, with an estimated 10,000–15,000 affected children born each year and a carrier frequency of approximately 3–4% in the general population. Despite this, a large number of cases remain undiagnosed or are diagnosed late, particularly in individuals with milder forms who may live for years with unexplained anemia.

Delayed diagnosis has far-reaching consequences. Patients may develop preventable complications, families miss opportunities for genetic counseling, and access to emerging therapies is delayed or entirely missed. In the era of precision medicine, such delays are no longer acceptable.

The Problem Of Misdiagnosis

A major challenge in India is the frequent misdiagnosis of thalassemia as iron deficiency anemia, especially in primary care settings. Many patients receive repeated courses of iron supplementation without clinical improvement, while the underlying genetic disorder remains unrecognized.

Certain clinical clues should prompt further evaluation: persistent microcytic anemia unresponsive to iron therapy, a family history of anemia or transfusion dependence, and a disproportionately high red blood cell count relative to hemoglobin levels. Diagnostic confirmation is straightforward with hemoglobin analysis using HPLC or electrophoresis; however, these tests are not always utilized at the appropriate time.

Diagnosis And Screening

The approval of oral drugs underscores a fundamental shift, from managing symptoms to modifying disease biology. However, these benefits are maximized when therapy is initiated early, before irreversible organ damage occurs, for which timely diagnosis is pivotal.

Thalassemia diagnosis begins with a complete blood count demonstrating microcytic anemia with low mean corpuscular volume and a relatively high red cell count. Peripheral smear findings include target cells and anisopoikilocytosis. Confirmation is achieved through hemoglobin analysis using HPLC or electrophoresis, which typically shows elevated HbA₂ in β-thalassemia trait. Molecular testing further identifies specific gene mutations, enabling definitive diagnosis and prenatal counseling.

Screening programs play a pivotal role. Carrier detection through HbA₂ estimation, premarital and antenatal screening, and cascade testing within families are essential strategies, particularly in high-prevalence populations like India.

The mutation spectrum in India is well characterized. The most common β-thalassemia mutation is IVS-I-5 (G→C), accounting for nearly half of cases, followed by IVS-I-1 (G→T), codon 41/42 deletion, codon 8/9 insertion, and the 619 bp deletion. In α-thalassemia, the –α³․⁷ deletion predominates. This knowledge allows for cost-effective targeted molecular screening.

For years, the central question in thalassemia was: how do we manage this disease?

Today, it is shifting to: how early can we treat it effectively? Oral drugs represent a major therapeutic advance; however, cost considerations, accessibility, and long-term real-world outcomes will influence their widespread adoption. Nevertheless, the direction is clear: thalassemia care is entering a transformative era. In modern medicine, early diagnosis is no longer just beneficial; it is truly transformative.