Credits: Canva
This digital era is all about catching up with trends, TikToks and reels, but at the cost of what? Many believe all of this happens at the cost of one's health and mental well-being. As a result, the grades of students, especially in high school, when they are exposed to social media the most, start to drop. However, a study based on the University of Birmingham's findings, peer-revied and published by the Lancet's journal for European health policy compared 1,277 students and the rules their 30 different secondary schools had for smartphone use at break and lunchtimes.` The study found something else, contrary to the popular belief.
The study found that banning phones in school is not linked to pupils getting higher grades or having a better mental wellbeing. The study found that a student's sleep, classroom behavior, exercise or how long they spend on their phones did not seem much different for schools with phone bans versus schools without it.
However, the study did find that spending longer time in social media or on smartphones in general may be linked to such measures. This was the first study in the world that looked at school phone rules along with the children's health and education.
In an interview to the BBC, Dr Victoria Goodyear, study's lead author said, that the findings are not against smartphone bans in school, but, a suggestion that bans in isolation are not enough to tackle the negative impacts.
The focus must be on reducing how much time the student spends on their phone, which cannot just be supervised in school.
The schools were chosen from a sample of 1,341 mainstream state schools in England. Among these the behavior of student form schools that banned the smartphones versus those who did not ban it were studied to find out that schools restricting smartphone use did not seem to see the intended improvements on health, wellbeing and focus of the student, as one would have wished to.
The study also used the internationally recognized Warwick-Edinburg Mental Well-Being Scale, a measure of mental well-being focusing entirely on positive aspects. It is a 14-item scale with 5 response categories. This method was used to determine the wellbeing of the children who participated in the research. It further looked at students' anxiety and depression levels.
It also asked from teachers about whether their students were on target, below target or above target in English and maths.
When asked students, they said that the smartphone ban forces you to hang out and chat with your friends and some of them think in lower school, it has helped them spend less time scrolling social media and making lots of friends.
Experts point out that the important part is to help students learn to use their phone in a safe and controlled space. This way, phone-related issues, especially distraction, its impact on your mental health, will be much less. The answer is not ban, but the use of the smartphone in a controlled environment, so students learn to value the "freedom" they have been given to use them at break and lunch.
Credit: AI
The hype around GLP-1 weight loss drugs keeps growing due to numerous new benefits as well as side effects that are discovered every other day. A recent study found that the risk of aortic aneurysm rupture is significantly less among GLP-1 users. The study was published in the Journal of Vascular Surgery.
GLP-1 receptor agonists is a a class of medicines that is widely used to treat type 2 diabetes and obesity. Users have reported substantial weight loss results with the help of these medicines like Ozempic, Mounjaro, Zepbound and others.
Now, researchers have found that people with abdominal aortic aneurysms who used GLP-1 drugs had a 46% lower risk of rupture over five years compared with those who did not use these medicines. This means that GLP-1 drugs may also have cardiovascular benefit apart from diabetes and obesity.
The study analysed health records from 123 healthcare organisations in the US. It is based on more than 412,000 people diagnosed with abdominal aortic aneurysms who underwent imaging surveillance every six months.
After matching patients based on factors like age, sex, diabetes, high blood pressure, smoking, heart disease and kidney disease, the researchers compared 13,722 GLP-1 receptor agonist users with an equal number of non-users.
Also read: ‘Godzilla’ Drug Retatrutide Reverses Sleep Apnea In 1 In 4 Diabetes Patients
After five years, aortic aneurysm rupture was recorded in about 1.6% of people taking GLP-1 drugs, compared to 2.4% of those who were not taking them.
The researchers reported a hazard ratio of 0.538, indicating a 46.2% lower risk of rupture among GLP-1 drug users after adjustment.
The difference was also observed at the two-year mark, when rupture occurred in 1.1% of GLP-1 users compared to 1.8% of non-users.
People taking GLP-1 drugs also had fewer elective aneurysm repairs. At five years, 2.1% of users underwent elective repair compared to 3% of non-users.
The study further found lower rates of major cardiovascular events like heart attacks, strokes and heart failure, as well as lower all-cause mortality among GLP-1 users.
An abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) occurs when a section of the aorta, the body's largest artery, becomes enlarged or bulges due to weakening of its wall. It develops in the part of the aorta that passes through the abdomen.
Many abdominal aortic aneurysms do not cause symptoms and are detected during tests. However, as the aneurysm enlarges, its risk of rupture increases.
A ruptured aneurysm is considered to be a medical emergency as it can cause severe internal bleeding. Symptoms may include sudden, severe abdominal or back pain, dizziness, fainting and a rapid heartbeat.
Smoking, older age, high blood pressure, atherosclerosis and a family history of aneurysms are among the risk factors.
GLP-1 receptor agonists work by mimicking the naturally occurring GLP-1 hormone. They help regulate blood sugar by stimulating insulin release when glucose levels are high, slowing the emptying of stomach and reducing appetite.
Some of their effects may also impact blood vessel health. Abdominal aortic aneurysms develop through several processes, including inflammation, damage to vascular smooth muscle cells and changes in the proteins that maintain the artery wall.
GLP-1 drugs have shown anti-inflammatory and cardiovascular benefits in older research. The researchers suggest these effects may help explain the lower rates of aneurysm-related complications observed in the study.
The findings are promising but do not conclusively prove that GLP-1 medicines prevent aneurysm rupture. This was a retrospective observational study, meaning researchers examined existing health records rather than randomly assigning patients to receive the drugs.
One important limitation was that aneurysm size was not included among the matching variables. Since aneurysm size is a major determinant of rupture risk, differences between the groups could have impacted the findings.
Credit: AI
When a woman misses her period, pregnancy is usually the first thing she thinks about. If that is ruled out, stress, weight changes or a hormonal imbalance may seem like the obvious explanations. But when periods become irregular or stop for several months, there may be more to the story.
In some women, these changes can also signal a risk to bone health. The menstrual cycle is controlled by a complex interaction between the brain and the ovaries. Oestrogen, one of the key hormones involved, is important not only for reproductive health but also for maintaining strong bones. It helps regulate the continuous process of bone breakdown and rebuilding.
When oestrogen levels remain low for a prolonged period, this balance can be disturbed, leading to a reduction in bone mineral density and, in some cases, an increased risk of fractures.
Menstrual health is not just about getting a period every month. It can offer important clues about what is happening elsewhere in the body.
Also read: Why Do My Breasts Hurt Right Before My Period?
One possible cause is functional hypothalamic amenorrhoea, a condition in which the brain reduces the hormonal signals that stimulate the ovaries. It may occur when the body is under physical or emotional stress, particularly in the setting of inadequate food intake, rapid weight loss, excessive exercise or a combination of these factors.
In simple terms, the body may not be getting enough energy to support all its normal functions. Reproductive activity can slow down as a result. If this continues, the effects may extend beyond the menstrual cycle.
Low energy availability can affect hormones involved in bone formation and maintenance. Inadequate intake of protein, calcium and vitamin D may further compromise bone health.
The concern is particularly important in adolescents and young women, because these are the years when the body builds much of its peak bone mass. If this process is disrupted, they may not achieve their full bone-strength potential, which can have implications for bone health later in life. It can happen even when a woman is not underweight.
One common misconception is that only very thin women are at risk. In reality, a woman can have a seemingly healthy body weight and still not be eating enough to meet the demands of her daily activity.
A student under academic pressure may skip meals regularly. A working professional may combine long hours with restrictive eating, while a woman who exercises intensively may not increase her food intake to match her energy needs. In such situations, menstrual changes may be one of the first noticeable signs that something is wrong.
Persistent tiredness, declining exercise performance, poor recovery after workouts and recurrent bone or muscle injuries may provide additional clues.
These symptoms are easy to dismiss as the result of a busy lifestyle, but they deserve attention when they occur alongside irregular or absent periods.
Also read: Women With Endometriosis Are Earning Less, Reveals Study
Although inadequate energy intake and prolonged stress can affect menstruation, they are not the only explanations. Pregnancy must first be ruled out. Other possible causes include polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), thyroid disorders, raised prolactin levels, premature ovarian insufficiency, chronic illnesses and certain medications.
A woman should seek medical evaluation if her periods stop for three months without an explanation, if her cycles remain persistently irregular, or if menstrual changes are accompanied by significant weight loss, restrictive eating, excessive exercise, bone pain or a stress fracture.
The assessment usually begins with a detailed menstrual history and questions about diet, exercise, weight changes, stress and medication use. Depending on the findings, the doctor may recommend pregnancy testing, blood tests to assess thyroid function and reproductive hormones, prolactin levels and other investigations.
A bone mineral density scan may also be appropriate when periods have been absent for a prolonged period or when additional risk factors for bone loss are present.
Treatment depends on the underlying cause. When inadequate energy availability is responsible, the priority is to restore a healthy balance between food intake, physical activity and recovery.
This may require nutritional guidance, changes to exercise routines and support for managing psychological stress. A gynaecologist may work with an endocrinologist, dietitian or mental-health professional, depending on the individual’s needs.
Adequate calcium, vitamin D and protein are important for bone health, but supplements alone cannot correct an ongoing energy deficit. Similarly, hormonal medication should not be prescribed simply to produce a period without first understanding why menstruation has stopped.
A menstrual cycle is more than a monthly reproductive event. Persistent changes can provide valuable clues about hormonal function, nutrition and overall health. Paying attention to these changes early can help identify underlying problems and, where necessary, protect bone health for the future.
Credit: iStock
The manosphere is a network of male-centric online groups, forums and communities that focus on men’s issues, masculinity definition and the changing roles and treatment of men in today’s world. Oftentimes, the content produced in the manosphere leans heavily towards promoting misogyny online, distorting the definitions of feminism and masculinity.
A recent Lancet report highlights this issue, stating that these online communities that promote misogyny, male victimisation and hostility towards feminism are actually a growing public health problem. The report also suggests that this public health concern should be addressed in the same way as obesity or smoking.
The researchers say that the so-called manosphere not only normalises violence and misogyny towards women but also affects men’s mental health, fueling issues like social isolation and discouraging them from seeking help.
In the paper, titled Reframing the manosphere: a public health response to a commercial ecosystem, authors Sarah J Hawkes and Kent Buse describe the manosphere as a “diffuse commercial ecosystem and loose collection of online communities united by shared beliefs about masculinity, misogyny, and male victimisation”.
These communities often promote the idea that men are facing masculinity crisis and social isolation and that feminism has systematically disadvantaged and exploited them. The authors argue that these narratives can wrongfully make young men believe that their personal difficulties are due to women, which could direct their frustration towards the opposite gender.
The authors wrote, “Men’s problems are framed [in the manosphere] as the result of feminism rather than structural conditions, and masculine identity is commodified through products and paid content that normalise and reinforce health-harming and performance-oriented masculinities.”
Also read: Gender-based Violence Surging Global Antimicrobial Resistance, Say Experts
The authors identify several conditions that can make boys and young men vulnerable to manosphere content, including loneliness, educational disengagement, social exclusion, financial insecurity and uncertainty about their future.
Prof Sarah Hawkes, the report’s other author, said, “The manosphere offers boys and young men belonging, identity and an explanation for why life feels hard."
She added, “Those needs are real. A response that only removes the manosphere, without offering something credible in its place, will fail. We need to offer boys something better, not just tell them what to avoid.”
The authors also say that they may also reinforce resentment towards women and promote toxic ideas about masculinity, gender, relationships and success. They also say that these communities can harm men's mental health, contribute to body image concerns and discourage them from seeking professional support.
The authors argue that this business model can exploit insecurity while presenting structural problems as individual failures or the result of feminism. Some influencers promote twisted ideas of masculinity and encourage followers to purchase supplements, hormones and financial products.
Prof Kent Buse, a co-author of the paper and co-founder of the social justice thinktank Global 50/50, explained, “This is a business model, not a fringe. Outrage and grievance are good for business, so the system rewards the most extreme content. Expect the playbook that served tobacco so well: blame the individual, and call regulation an attack on freedom. Public health has a tested toolkit for commercial harms and we should use it.”
Also read: 'Put Up with the Pain': UK Report Exposes Gaps in Women's Reproductive Healthcare
The report also examines the consequences of following manosphere for women and girls. The authors warn that the manosphere can normalise misogynistic outlooks, reinforce gender inequality and create an environment in which violence against women and girls is more readily accepted.
The concern is not limited to individual posts or influencers. The researchers describe a commercial network in which content creators can benefit from extreme expressions of gender and hostility.
They compare the strategies used by this online ecosystem with those of industries such as tobacco and ultra-processed food, arguing that both can shift responsibility towards individuals while resisting regulation.
“Outrage and grievance are good for business, so the system rewards the most extreme content,” said co-author Kent Buse.
He added, “Boys and men are not the problem. The problem is the conditions that leave them isolated and without a secure future, and the companies that profit from their anger and insecurity.”
Also read: Amid Changing Health Laws In The US, Would Abortion Become Illegal?
The authors argue that simply removing misogynistic content or restricting access to certain communities will not address the reasons why young men are drawn to them.
Co-author Sarah Hawkes said, “The manosphere offers boys and young men belonging, identity and an explanation for why life feels hard. Those needs are real. A response that only removes the manosphere, without offering something credible in its place, will fail. We need to offer boys something better, not just tell them what to avoid.”
The report also calls for a coordinated response involving governments, schools, healthcare services and community organisations. This includes improving access to education, skills training and employment opportunities, addressing social isolation and ensuring that boys and young men can access mental health services.
The researchers identify six priorities for action: addressing the social and economic conditions that make young men vulnerable, improving collaboration between health and education services, developing effective communication strategies, regulating harmful platforms, investing in research and monitoring, and confronting the bigger misogyny and anti-gender equality attitudes that keeps these communities running.
They argue that regulation should focus on the commercial incentives that amplify harmful content, rather than placing the entire responsibility on individuals who consume it.
© $2026 Times Horizon Private Limited