Credits: Canva
This digital era is all about catching up with trends, TikToks and reels, but at the cost of what? Many believe all of this happens at the cost of one's health and mental well-being. As a result, the grades of students, especially in high school, when they are exposed to social media the most, start to drop. However, a study based on the University of Birmingham's findings, peer-revied and published by the Lancet's journal for European health policy compared 1,277 students and the rules their 30 different secondary schools had for smartphone use at break and lunchtimes.` The study found something else, contrary to the popular belief.
The study found that banning phones in school is not linked to pupils getting higher grades or having a better mental wellbeing. The study found that a student's sleep, classroom behavior, exercise or how long they spend on their phones did not seem much different for schools with phone bans versus schools without it.
However, the study did find that spending longer time in social media or on smartphones in general may be linked to such measures. This was the first study in the world that looked at school phone rules along with the children's health and education.
In an interview to the BBC, Dr Victoria Goodyear, study's lead author said, that the findings are not against smartphone bans in school, but, a suggestion that bans in isolation are not enough to tackle the negative impacts.
The focus must be on reducing how much time the student spends on their phone, which cannot just be supervised in school.
The schools were chosen from a sample of 1,341 mainstream state schools in England. Among these the behavior of student form schools that banned the smartphones versus those who did not ban it were studied to find out that schools restricting smartphone use did not seem to see the intended improvements on health, wellbeing and focus of the student, as one would have wished to.
The study also used the internationally recognized Warwick-Edinburg Mental Well-Being Scale, a measure of mental well-being focusing entirely on positive aspects. It is a 14-item scale with 5 response categories. This method was used to determine the wellbeing of the children who participated in the research. It further looked at students' anxiety and depression levels.
It also asked from teachers about whether their students were on target, below target or above target in English and maths.
When asked students, they said that the smartphone ban forces you to hang out and chat with your friends and some of them think in lower school, it has helped them spend less time scrolling social media and making lots of friends.
Experts point out that the important part is to help students learn to use their phone in a safe and controlled space. This way, phone-related issues, especially distraction, its impact on your mental health, will be much less. The answer is not ban, but the use of the smartphone in a controlled environment, so students learn to value the "freedom" they have been given to use them at break and lunch.
Credit: AI Credited Image
Teachers are unarguably one of the most important influences during the early stages of a person's life. Along with learning and wisdom, teachers can also influence a child's or adolescent's mental health. Thus, they help shape students who are the future of any society or nation. This impactful profession and its contributions are celebrated worldwide, including in India.
The deteriorating mental health condition in students has escalated into a major global public health concern, heavily accelerated by academic pressure, systemic changes, and digital isolation. The World Health Organization (WHO), UNICEF, and Indian governmental bodies like NCERT have shared data that reveals a grim situation: there is a huge gap between the rising psychological distress among youth and the infrastructure available to support them.
The role of teachers in youth mental health is a topic that the study "A Shelter for the Heart: The Impact of Teacher Quality on Students' Mental Health" has thoroughly analyzed. The research, published in the journal Health Economics in 2026, was conducted in China and included 3,529 Grade 7 students, 86 classrooms, and 43 schools throughout the country. The study examines the impact of teacher quality, proxied by teacher experience, on student mental health.
According to the study, the role of the head teacher is particularly important to a student's mental well-being. While subject teachers are primarily responsible for learning, the study emphasizes that experienced teachers might do more than improve grades—they may also help protect students' mental health.
The study finds that the more experienced head teachers tended to build stronger teacher–student relationships, communicate more with parents, and create more supportive classroom environments. They were less likely to ignore or isolate struggling students and more likely to try to help them. All in all, the researchers concluded that school environments play an important role in determining adolescents’ mental health.
The study “A study on mental health of students teacher in relation to their achievement in education psychology” by researchers at Tamil Nadu Teachers Education University, Chennai, found significant differences in mental health based on gender and location, with female and rural student-teachers reporting better mental health than their male and urban counterparts.
A 2024 study published in BMC Psychology by researchers from McMaster University, the University of Sydney, the University of Johannesburg and the Hospital for Sick Children examined the relationship between teacher distress and student mental health. The researchers analysed data from 23,568 students and 1,478 teachers across 268 schools in Ontario, Canada. The researchers suggested that supporting teachers’ mental health and creating safer school environments could also benefit students’ well-being.
A 2019 study published in the Journal of Affective Disorders by researchers led by Stephen Harding also suggested that better teacher well-being was associated with better student well-being, highlighting the potential importance of supporting teachers’ mental health within schools.
Teachers’ Day 2026 in India is celebrated on September 5 to honour the contribution of teachers and educators. The day marks the birth anniversary of Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, India’s first Vice President and second President, who was a distinguished philosopher, scholar and teacher. Since 1962, his birthday has been observed as Teachers’ Day in India. The occasion recognises teachers’ role in shaping students’ knowledge, character, confidence and well-being, while inspiring future generations to learn, grow and contribute to society.
Credits: Canva
Deceased organ donation covers our organ needs. In India, we are woefully short of organs such as kidneys and livers in cases of liver and kidney failure that need to be transplanted.
Deceased donation, as the name sounds, is a donation by people who are brain dead, whose family has now accepted and has willingly donated their organs for the benefit of the rest of the world.
Live donation, on the other hand, is a donation by living or emotionally related individuals who want to donate a kidney to a diseased patient. A live donation is usually transplanted immediately. It's done in the same centre, and both are done together, as the harvesting of the organ from the donor and transplantation are done simultaneously.
On the other hand, a deceased organ from a cadaveric donor may be harvested in a different geographical location and may be transported over time and over a lot of distance to another centre.
Deceased donation can be done for organs that cannot be transplanted by live donation, which are so consequential to a human body, such as the heart, lungs, and pancreas. They are very vital and cannot be transplanted from a live patient to another.
In a deceased organ donation, we can even donate tissues such as the cornea, skin, and blood vessels, which are required as a part of donation, as a part of other organ donation transplant programmes or, for example, in giving vision to people who have a white cornea or corneal opacity.
These are a few differences between live and deceased or cadaveric donation.
Dr. Vikram Shah Batra, Director - Urology, Kidney Transplant and Uro Oncology, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Dwarka
Credits: Canva
A uterine growth diagnosis can be very alarming. That said, it is vital to note that such growths are often simple, run-of-the-mill fibroids. They are non-cancerous, very common, and completely harmless. At the same time, it is important to realise what uterine sarcoma is, and why fibroids are often confused with uterine sarcoma. It comes down to anatomy. The uterus consists mainly of smooth muscle tissue. A fibroid is just an overgrowth of this smooth muscle that expands over time. Uterine sarcoma is a rare cancer that originates within that very same muscle wall. Since both develop in the same spot, they tend to trigger identical symptoms—like unexpected bleeding, pelvic aching, or pressure.
Before starting treatment, it is important to fully understand what the diagnosis is, as that is the first step to safety.
Surgeons often treat routine fibroids with minimally invasive techniques. These methods break or chop the tissue into smaller fragments so it can be pulled through tiny incisions. If a growth, however, turns out to be an unsuspected sarcoma, breaking it apart inside the pelvis can spread malignant cells. A thorough diagnostic workup beforehand makes sure nothing gets disrupted accidentally, so that the surgical team builds the safest possible treatment plan.
Here is some genuine peace of mind: benign fibroids don't suddenly turn into cancer. Medical research shows that malignant transformation inside an existing fibroid is exceptionally rare. Because fibroids and sarcomas are biologically different conditions from the start, monitoring a standard fibroid does not put you at risk of it turning into a tumor down the line.
Most fibroids stay completely harmless throughout life. It is, however, important to watch out for a few specific red flags:
Post-menopause changes: Fibroids shrink on their own once hormone levels drop after menopause. Any new growth or spotting at this stage demands a closer look.
Growths that keep expanding on medication: If a mass gets bigger while one is on prescriptions designed to shrink it, the patient must seek out a secondary review.
Ambiguous scans: When a routine ultrasound shows atypical tissue structure, stepping up to advanced imaging helps clear up the picture.
Following an ultrasound, it is recommended to opt for a dedicated pelvic MRI for a much sharper view of the uterine muscle wall to confirm whether a mass is truly benign.
Getting a second opinion from a specialist is a normal, proactive move. It is especially critical if:
The good news is that uterine sarcomas are remarkably rare, making up just 2% to 5% of all uterine cancers. A patient needs to be cognizant by paying attention to changes in the body and asking questions about the scans.
Dr Bindhu KS - Sr. Consultant Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Robotic Surgery, Apollo Hospitals Navi Mumbai
© $2026 Times Horizon Private Limited