This digital era is all about catching up with trends, TikToks and reels, but at the cost of what? Many believe all of this happens at the cost of one's health and mental well-being. As a result, the grades of students, especially in high school, when they are exposed to social media the most, start to drop. However, a study based on the University of Birmingham's findings, peer-revied and published by the Lancet's journal for European health policy compared 1,277 students and the rules their 30 different secondary schools had for smartphone use at break and lunchtimes.` The study found something else, contrary to the popular belief.

What Did The Study Find?

The study found that banning phones in school is not linked to pupils getting higher grades or having a better mental wellbeing. The study found that a student's sleep, classroom behavior, exercise or how long they spend on their phones did not seem much different for schools with phone bans versus schools without it.

However, the study did find that spending longer time in social media or on smartphones in general may be linked to such measures. This was the first study in the world that looked at school phone rules along with the children's health and education.

In an interview to the BBC, Dr Victoria Goodyear, study's lead author said, that the findings are not against smartphone bans in school, but, a suggestion that bans in isolation are not enough to tackle the negative impacts.

The focus must be on reducing how much time the student spends on their phone, which cannot just be supervised in school.

How Was The Study Conducted?

The schools were chosen from a sample of 1,341 mainstream state schools in England. Among these the behavior of student form schools that banned the smartphones versus those who did not ban it were studied to find out that schools restricting smartphone use did not seem to see the intended improvements on health, wellbeing and focus of the student, as one would have wished to.

The study also used the internationally recognized Warwick-Edinburg Mental Well-Being Scale, a measure of mental well-being focusing entirely on positive aspects. It is a 14-item scale with 5 response categories. This method was used to determine the wellbeing of the children who participated in the research. It further looked at students' anxiety and depression levels.

It also asked from teachers about whether their students were on target, below target or above target in English and maths.

What Do The Students Feel?

When asked students, they said that the smartphone ban forces you to hang out and chat with your friends and some of them think in lower school, it has helped them spend less time scrolling social media and making lots of friends.

Experts point out that the important part is to help students learn to use their phone in a safe and controlled space. This way, phone-related issues, especially distraction, its impact on your mental health, will be much less. The answer is not ban, but the use of the smartphone in a controlled environment, so students learn to value the "freedom" they have been given to use them at break and lunch.

Every morning, millions begin their day with a quick breakfast and blood pressure (BP) medication swallowed mechanically. But what happens when BP remains uncontrolled despite medicines? Uncontrolled hypertension is one of the most underestimated health threats. Often called the silent killer, it quietly damages the heart, brain, kidneys, and blood vessels.

The BP reading on the cuff captures only a visible measurement. BP that remains above goal over time despite treatment is concerning. Hypertension affects approximately 1.4 billion adults worldwide. Studies suggest that almost 54% of Indian patients have uncontrolled hypertension even while taking ≥2 medications. Thus, treatment does not necessarily mean control.

Why Does BP Control Matter?

Global organizations recommend stricter BP targets, aiming for readings below 130/80 mmHg or even 120 mmHg if tolerated. Studies show that each 10 mmHg reduction in systolic BP can decrease the risk of major cardiovascular events by 20%, stroke by 27%, heart failure by 28%, and death by 13%.

On the other hand, uncontrolled hypertension increases the risk of heart attacks, strokes, heart failure, end-stage kidney disease, type 2 diabetes, and death.

But What If The Numbers Don’t Change Despite Medication?

In persistently uncontrolled hypertension that other causes cannot explain, a hidden culprit called aldosterone is an under-recognized driver. Normally, aldosterone balances sodium and water to regulate BP.

However, in patients with uncontrolled hypertension, aldosterone production may remain abnormally high, causing sodium and fluid buildup, increasing BP.

Approximately 30% of patients with hypertension may have aldosterone dysregulation, and patients with resistant hypertension, obesity, type 2 diabetes, sleep apnea, and hypokalemia are at greater risk. Nearly 10–20% of patients with hypertension are treatment resistant, increasing their risk. In these patients, aldosterone dysregulation could be an important cause.

It is time to look beyond the cuff, as uncontrolled hypertension is a chronic, progressive, and often silent condition with serious consequences. Improving patient outcomes requires greater urgency, earlier intervention, better treatment optimization, and stronger awareness of underlying drivers such as aldosterone.

It is time to identify and treat the root causes of uncontrolled hypertension, so that patients can regain lasting BP control.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which includes Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, affects millions of people worldwide. The lifelong condition commonly begins in adolescence or early adulthood and can require repeated hospital treatment, long-term immunosuppressive medication, and, in some cases, surgery.

Despite advances in treatment, many patients cycle through multiple therapies without achieving lasting disease control, impacting their lives and costing healthcare systems millions.

Now, a team of UK researchers from the Universities of Oxford, Newcastle, and Cambridge has identified an important driver of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

The findings, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, suggest that inflammatory bowel disease is not a single condition but a group of biologically distinct diseases driven by different underlying mechanisms.

"Understanding what drives the inflammation provides a clear explanation for disease in this group of people and opens the door to new treatments that target the autoantibodies themselves or cells that produce those autoantibodies," said Professor Holm Uhlig, a pediatric gastroenterologist and director of the Centre for Human Genetics, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford.

What Did the Study Find?

Also read: Alcohol Study Shelved By Trump Administration Published In Scientific Journal: What Did It Find?

The researchers analyzed more than 4,900 patients with IBD and discovered that:

• A substantial subset of patients shows autoimmune responses to one of the guardians of the immune system, interleukin-10 (IL-10), which leads to uncontrolled inflammation.
• This damaging immune response is the mechanism for one of the strongest known genetic risk factors for IBD.

Antibodies that block interleukin-10 (IL-10), a cell-to-cell messenger that normally acts as one of the body's key controls on inflammation, effectively remove the immune system's natural "brake" on inflammation, allowing inflammatory responses to continue unchecked.

The researchers found high levels of anti-IL-10 neutralizing autoantibodies in the blood of about 3.5% of IBD patients, including those with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, but not in healthy individuals. This could equate to 15,000–20,000 people with IBD in the UK carrying these autoantibodies.

The Genetic Link

Read More: US FDA Approves First New Sunscreen Ingredient Since the 1990s

The researchers also found that the presence of these antibodies was strongly linked to carriage of a particular genetic variant known as HLA-DRB1*01:03.

The link between HLA-DRB1*01:03 and a severe form of inflammatory bowel disease was first identified by Oxford researchers 30 years ago.

The new findings show that people carrying this variant are far more likely to develop antibodies that block IL-10, helping explain how the gene contributes to disease.

What Could This Mean for Patients?

The researchers say the findings support the development of a blood test to identify this subgroup of patients, helping clinicians move quickly toward more appropriate treatment.

What Is IBD?

As per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), IBD refers to a group of lifelong diseases that affect your intestines. The main types of IBD are ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease.

Ulcerative colitis affects the large intestine, while Crohn’s disease can inflame any part of the digestive tract. Both are lifelong conditions of unknown cause that trigger abdominal pain, diarrhea and other complications, with no known cure.

What Are The Symptoms Of IBD That People Usually Ignore?

• Diarrhea or changes in bowel movements
• Stomach pain
• Fatigue
• Nausea
• Weight loss

• Dehydration
• Increased risk of colon and rectal cancers
• Low red blood cell count (anemia)
• Reduced bone density
• Joint pain
• Skin changes
• Eye irritation
• Delayed or impaired growth in some children.

With modern lifestyle changes, delayed childbearing, and other factors, infertility among Indians as young as 25 has become a looming public health concern for the country. However, the issue does not stop at the present.

A recent study published by The Menopause Society in their journal Menopause found that infertility may lead to earlier menopause, raising questions about the long-term reproductive health implications of this demographic shift.

What is Menopause?

Menopause is the final stage of a woman’s reproductive lifecycle, when menstruation stops, and she can no longer get pregnant. When the ovaries stop producing estrogen and progesterone, and a woman misses her period for 12 consecutive months, she has officially reached menopause.

Although menopause is a regular part of ageing, women typically reach menopause between 45 and 55 years of age. If menopause occurs before age 45, it is considered early menopause. If it occurs before 40, it is termed premature menopause – rarer than early menopause but involves the same causes, symptoms, and health risks.

While previous studies have been conducted to find a link between infertility and both early and premature menopause, they have had mixed results and did not consider the effect of different types of infertility; this study focuses on women with a history of primary infertility, women who have never achieved pregnancy, and have difficulty conceiving.

What Did the Study Find?

For the study, researchers examined the reproductive lifecycle of nearly 700 women in the U.S. – 461 with primary infertility and 530 without infertility – who were otherwise demographically similar (age, education, smoking status, etc.). It found that the 461 women had a 25% higher likelihood of reaching natural menopause about 1.2 years earlier than the 530.

Researchers also noted that women with underlying endometriosis as a cause of their infertility reached menopause between 40 and 44 years, much sooner than the national average of the United States, i.e., 52 years.

Possible explanations include accelerated ovarian ageing, reduced ovarian reserve, or the effects of endometriosis on ovarian function. But no matter the causes, the implications for women’s long-term health are substantial.

Why Does This Matter?

All women are born with a finite, predetermined number of eggs, which are sensitive to age, environmental toxins, medications, hormonal imbalances, and lifestyle factors. When exposed to such risk factors, especially over a long period of time, the DNA inside the eggs is altered, causing permanent genetic damage and reducing the egg quality and quantity.

As a core part of the reproductive process, any damage to the eggs directly affects reproductive health and, in turn, long-term systemic health.

Infertility impacts more than the ability to conceive and go through a pregnancy; it is often a sign of underlying health conditions and potential chronic illnesses, acting as a biomarker of increased all-cause mortality. Experiencing infertility itself increases a woman’s risk of developing cardiovascular disease, metabolic disorders, gynecologic cancers, etc., but reaching menopause early on top of that puts them at further health risk, adding osteoporosis and cognitive decline to the mix, along with the emotional distress and mental health challenges.

Indian women already reach menopause earlier than women in Western countries, with the average woman experiencing menopause at 46.2 years of age. With fertility rates dropping across the country, this study highlights just how critical it is to increase fertility awareness. Early screenings and regular fertility testing can help detect risks early and enable timely intervention, not only to combat the ongoing crisis but to ensure that women live healthy, fulfilling lives without impending morbidity.