Credits: Canva
This digital era is all about catching up with trends, TikToks and reels, but at the cost of what? Many believe all of this happens at the cost of one's health and mental well-being. As a result, the grades of students, especially in high school, when they are exposed to social media the most, start to drop. However, a study based on the University of Birmingham's findings, peer-revied and published by the Lancet's journal for European health policy compared 1,277 students and the rules their 30 different secondary schools had for smartphone use at break and lunchtimes.` The study found something else, contrary to the popular belief.
The study found that banning phones in school is not linked to pupils getting higher grades or having a better mental wellbeing. The study found that a student's sleep, classroom behavior, exercise or how long they spend on their phones did not seem much different for schools with phone bans versus schools without it.
However, the study did find that spending longer time in social media or on smartphones in general may be linked to such measures. This was the first study in the world that looked at school phone rules along with the children's health and education.
In an interview to the BBC, Dr Victoria Goodyear, study's lead author said, that the findings are not against smartphone bans in school, but, a suggestion that bans in isolation are not enough to tackle the negative impacts.
The focus must be on reducing how much time the student spends on their phone, which cannot just be supervised in school.
The schools were chosen from a sample of 1,341 mainstream state schools in England. Among these the behavior of student form schools that banned the smartphones versus those who did not ban it were studied to find out that schools restricting smartphone use did not seem to see the intended improvements on health, wellbeing and focus of the student, as one would have wished to.
The study also used the internationally recognized Warwick-Edinburg Mental Well-Being Scale, a measure of mental well-being focusing entirely on positive aspects. It is a 14-item scale with 5 response categories. This method was used to determine the wellbeing of the children who participated in the research. It further looked at students' anxiety and depression levels.
It also asked from teachers about whether their students were on target, below target or above target in English and maths.
When asked students, they said that the smartphone ban forces you to hang out and chat with your friends and some of them think in lower school, it has helped them spend less time scrolling social media and making lots of friends.
Experts point out that the important part is to help students learn to use their phone in a safe and controlled space. This way, phone-related issues, especially distraction, its impact on your mental health, will be much less. The answer is not ban, but the use of the smartphone in a controlled environment, so students learn to value the "freedom" they have been given to use them at break and lunch.
Credit: iStock
India is facing a significant and growing cancer burden, with the latest National Cancer Registry Programme study estimating that the lifetime risk of developing cancer in the country is 11% — about one in nine people.
The 2025 study also found that India ranks second in Asia and third globally in cancer incidence.
Around 17 states in India have already made cancer a notifiable disease, while the Supreme Court in August directed the remaining 19 states and Union Territories to comply with the requirement, aimed at enabling early detection and proper care of patients.
The petition before the court argued that the continued non-notification of cancer, despite its alarming and escalating burden in India, amounted to a grave abdication of the state's constitutional duty under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution. It said this denied uniform treatment to similarly situated citizens and undermined their fundamental right to health and a life of dignity.
The Supreme Court's order is legally binding on the remaining 19 states and Union Territories, which have until November 11, 2026, to comply with the directive.
By the deadline, the concerned administrations are required to transition cancer into a notifiable disease and formally submit their progress reports to the Supreme Court. States will also need to issue official Gazette notifications requiring public and private healthcare entities to report cancer cases and related data.
Speaking to HealthandMe, experts said making cancer notifiable could strengthen cancer surveillance, improve data collection and support research and treatment planning.
Dr Karishma Kirti, Consultant Obstetrician & Gynaecologist, Jaslok Hospital, Mumbai, said cancer should be treated as a notifiable disease, but through a system different from the traditional notification process used for infectious diseases.
Dr Kirti told HealthandMe that mandatory registration of cancer cases could help India understand cancer trends and generate more real-world data to guide research.
“Mandatory registration of cancer cases will in the future help in understanding trends, generating real-world data early, and guiding research. Most of the evidence-based medicine and treatment that we recommend comes from Western data and mandating cancer registration will help India generate its own data and understand the inherent characteristics of Indian cancers better.”
Dr Harit K Chaturvedi, CEO & Clinical Head, Apollo Oncology Network, said making cancer a notifiable disease could help improve cancer care and research as the country's cancer burden rises.
“No two cancers are the same and the disease cannot be fought in silos. As the burden of cancer cases is increasing, wherein India is projected to record 1.5 million cases in 2026, declaring cancer as a notifiable disease can enable better cancer care and research across India,” he told HealthandMe.
Chaturvedi said notification of cancer would also give impetus to the decades-old National Cancer Registry Program and enable proper and mandatory record-keeping of cancer cases, as seen in many developed nations.
“By making cancer a notifiable disease, we can ensure that all cancer cases are reported and documented accurately, enabling us to track cancer incidence, mortality, and survival rates.”
Importantly, he said, notification would also enable policymakers, healthcare providers and researchers to work with real-time data, which could help bring more awareness, strengthen prevention and early detection, and improve treatment outcomes and quality of life.
Credit: iStock
Recurring abdominal pain is often dismissed as acidity or indigestion. This becomes a matter of concern when persistent pain reaches the back and causes vomiting and weight loss. These are symptoms of a more serious disease such as chronic pancreatitis.
A recent case highlights the importance of recognizing the condition early. A 35-year-old mother of two had been living with severe upper abdominal pain for nearly three years. She experienced episodes that required hospital admission. Upon detailed investigations, it was confirmed to be a case of chronic idiopathic calcific pancreatitis. Long-standing inflammation had caused stones to develop within the pancreatic duct, which blocked the normal flow of digestive juices and triggered repeated attacks of pain. The underlying problem remained unresolved. To the patient, the mental toll of being a daily-wage worker came with loss of income and disruption to family life.
Chronic pancreatitis is when repeated inflammation causes permanent damage to the pancreas. Gradually, the gland becomes scarred, the pancreatic duct narrows, and stones develop. Pressure within the pancreas increases, thereby causing recurrent abdominal pain. As the disease advances, patients may also develop difficulty digesting food, unintended weight loss, nutritional deficiencies, and diabetes due to loss of pancreatic function. There exist multiple causes of chronic pancreatitis such as alcohol, gallstones, smoking, genetic disorders, autoimmune diseases and certain metabolic conditions. In a proportion of patients, no definite cause can be identified despite extensive evaluation.
Diagnosis is made on clinical grounds and imaging modalities such as ultrasound, CT scan, or MRI, which are helpful in identifying changes in the pancreas and detecting ductal stones. Early diagnosis is essential to prevent further complications and long-term outcomes. Treatment is modified according to the severity of the illness and the patient's signs and symptoms. Initial management is done in the form of dietary modifications, enzyme supplementation, and avoidance of substances such as alcohol and tobacco. However, when pain persists despite medical treatment, surgery may be required to relieve the obstruction and restore pancreatic drainage. This also occurs when stones obstruct the pancreatic duct,
In this patient's case, the severity of the case warranted surgery in order to ensure the best chance of lasting relief. Prior to the surgery, the patient consulted multiple hospitals before treatment. She underwent a minimally invasive robotic-assisted procedure to remove the pancreatic duct stones and create a new drainage pathway for pancreatic secretions. She had been advised open surgery but delayed it because she feared the large incision and long recovery; before this, she was admitted every 2-3 months for severe pain. The surgery was performed through small incisions with reduced tissue trauma as compared to conventional open surgery. The recovery was unsuccessful, and the patient was discharged with pancreatic enzyme supplementation.
Three months later, she was free from the disabling pain that had dominated her life. She had returned to work and was able to resume her daily routine.
Available treatment options have increased due to minimally invasive and robotic techniques for selected patients, but they may not be suitable for everyone. The choice of treatment is dependent on multiple factors such as the stage of the disease, the anatomy of the pancreas, and the patient's overall condition.
The more important message, however, extends beyond surgery. Persistent pain should never be ignored or considered a common passing occurrence; neither should it be repeatedly treated with painkillers without identifying the cause.
Earlier diagnosis and timely referral can be encouraged by raising awareness amongst the general public to prevent recurring hospital visits. Awareness can make the difference between years of repeated hospitalizations and a return to a healthier, more productive life.
(Dr. Sreedhara V., Surgical Gastroenterologist, Apollo Hospitals Bannerghatta Road, Bengaluru)
Credit: iStock
Liver cancer rarely announces itself. It creeps in without warning, and by the time symptoms surface, the disease has often progressed to a stage where treatment options shrink, and outcomes worsen. That's why doctors have long called it a "silent killer."
In India, the threat is growing. Rising rates of hepatitis infection, fatty liver disease, and lifestyle-driven risk factors are pushing the numbers up.
Data from the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) shows more than 40,000 new liver cancer cases reported in India, a figure that underscores a mounting public health challenge. The disease also carries a high mortality rate, largely because most cases surface only once treatment options have narrowed.
This fits into a much larger global picture: WHO's newly released Global Status Report on Cancer 2026 warns that annual cancer cases worldwide could climb from 20.6 million today to nearly 35 million by 2050 without urgent intervention, with infections like hepatitis B and C among the preventable risk factors driving a significant share of the burden.
The liver is a workhorse organ, filtering toxins, storing nutrients, and keeping the body running, and it can keep functioning almost normally even after cancer takes hold. That resilience is precisely what makes early detection so difficult. When symptoms do appear, they're vague enough to be mistaken for something else entirely:
Because these signs surface late, patients often delay seeking care, which is exactly why regular health checkups matter most for high-risk groups, including people with chronic liver disease, hepatitis infection, or fatty liver.
Liver cancer doesn't appear overnight; it's the result of years of accumulated damage. Key contributors include:
India's shifting disease landscape, sedentary routines, poor dietary habits, and metabolic disorders like obesity and diabetes, means liver cancer is no longer just an infectious-disease concern. It's increasingly a lifestyle disease too.
The good news: much of this risk is manageable.
Paired with lifestyle changes and timely medical care, these steps can meaningfully lower the risk of developing liver cancer and support long-term liver health.
Because liver cancer tends to progress silently, early detection is everything when it comes to improving outcomes. Doctors typically rely on a combination of diagnostic tools, ultrasound scans, AFP blood tests, CT or MRI imaging, and in some cases a liver biopsy, to catch the disease at a more treatable stage.
When caught early, treatment can significantly improve survival odds. The right approach depends on the stage of disease, liver function, and the patient's overall health:
Liver cancer is serious and life-threatening, but early diagnosis through screening, paired with timely medical intervention, can meaningfully improve treatment success and survival rates.
(By Dr. Kundan, Consultant - Surgical Oncology, Manipal Hospital, Ghaziabad_
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited