Pregnancy is usually a time of happiness and hope, but it also brings in the unexpected. While there is much talk placed on the health of the expectant mother, the quality sperm coming from the father could dramatically change the outcome of pregnancy. The latest study suggests the risks of sperm DNA damage, even increasing the risks of complications preeclampsia and birth prematurity.

In a groundbreaking research study conducted by scientists from Lund University in Sweden, scientists discovered that DNA damage in sperm increases the risk almost up to double that of preeclampsia, this is a dangerous condition that may arise during pregnancies characterized by high blood pressure. In addition, DNA anomalies also increase the risk of premature births, and this further entails increased related adverse health outcomes for infants born through such conditions.

The next step would be to find out which group of men respond best to methods to prevent and treat sperm DNA damage, and to test these methods to prevent pregnancy complications," said Dr. Amelie Stenqvist, a lecturer at Lund University. According to this study, a significant message is put forward that paternal health assumes an important role in a successful pregnancy.

It focused its research on men, specifically whose sperm contained high levels of DNA fragmentation. For instance, some 20% to 30% of babies born via in vitro fertilization have fathers whose sperm contains damaged DNA. The DNA fragmentation index, an indicator to assess the percentage of DNA damage in sperm, indicated that when the percentage of sperm with a DFI above 30% was observed, they had almost no chance of resulting in natural conception. Even a DFI greater than 20% showed that the chances of getting pregnant are highly risky as the risk factor for pregnancy complications like preeclampsia is much high.

Uncommon Complications during Pregnancy

The most alarming complication during pregnancy is preeclampsia. It affects approximately 5% to 8% of pregnancies worldwide, which can cause fatal conditions for both the mother and the baby. The new findings now point out that sperm DNA damage may contribute to this condition, especially if it is due to assisted reproductive techniques such as IVF pregnancies. The research found that a DFI above 20% doubled the risk of preeclampsia from a mere 5% to almost 11% per.

Apart from causing preeclampsia, DNA fragmentation in sperm is also known to increase the risk for prematurity. Most premature babies experience respiratory, neurological, and developmental complications. Therefore, some degree of early intervention might be important for prospective parents.

Some of the rarer, though serious complications include placental abruption, which is the separation of the placenta from the uterine wall and intrauterine growth restriction, a condition by which the baby does not grow normally in the womb. These conditions though rare are potentially catastrophic both to the mother and the child. Results from this study may help in establishing the contribution of the father in such pregnancies.

Further study into sperm DNA damage is of urgent interest with regard to its consequences for pregnancy outcomes. According to Professor Aleksander Giwercman of Lund University in the field of Reproductive Medicine, "the analysis of DFI should be introduced as routine test in all fertility clinics.". "It could give answers to couples who are having difficulties with infertility, but our latest result also shows that DFI analysis can be a method to identify high-risk pregnancies, explained Giwercman.

For many, DNA fragmentation in sperm is often treatable. Common causes are oxidative stress, age, smoking, being obese, and infections. Addressing these elements will likely reduce DNA damage in sperm for men, raising the chances for a healthy pregnancy and baby.

Overall, the study importance should take into consideration paternal as well as maternal health towards reaching for a healthy pregnancy. Though DNA fragmentation in the sperm is supposed to increase the risk factors for complications in pregnancies, the advances into novel treatment approaches and tests are likely to alleviate complications in many families. Thus the findings of this study offer optimism and pave a pathway to more holistic fertility treatments in the future.

Learning a second or even a third language may do more than expand your communication skills. According to a new study presented at the Federation of European Neuroscience Societies (FENS) Forum 2026 in Barcelona, learning a new language could also help keep your brain younger as you age.

The findings of the study say that people who speak multiple languages have brains that appear biologically younger than those who speak only one language. The research added to the growing evidence that multilingualism has a beneficial effect on healthy cognitive ageing.

About The Study

To investigate how language affects the ageing brain, researchers analysed brain activity in adults living in Spain's multilingual Basque region.

They used magnetoencephalography (MEG), a non-invasive brain imaging technique that records the brain's electrical activity, along with artificial intelligence (AI) to ascertain each participant's brain age.

Rather than relying on a person's actual age, the AI model assessed how well different regions of the brain communicated with one another, a key marker that normally weakens with age.

Researchers first trained the AI using brain scans from 728 adults with varying language abilities before validating the findings in an independent group of 144 participants.

Read more: Normal Ageing or Alzheimer's? Doctors Explain Six Key Differences to Watch For

The results revealed an association between multilingualism and a younger-looking brain. Compared with people who spoke only one language, bilingual participants had brains that appeared around six years younger. Those who spoke three languages had brains that looked approximately seven years younger, while participants fluent in four languages had brains that appeared up to 13 years younger.

Researcher Lucia Amoruso, deputy scientific director at the Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language in San Sebastián, Spain, said, “In simple terms, people who spoke more languages tended to have brains that looked younger than expected for their chronological age.”

The researchers also found that language proficiency mattered. People who learned additional languages earlier in life and became more fluent showed even greater differences in brain age.

Is Multilingualism The Key To Keep Your Brain Younger?

Scientists believe speaking multiple languages provides the brain with a constant mental workout. Regularly switching between languages requires attention, memory, problem-solving and cognitive control, all of which strengthen the neural networks involved in thinking and decision-making.

This exercise may help maintain stronger communication between brain regions, increasing the brain's resilience against age-related decline.

While the team considered factors like age, sex, and education, multilingual individuals may also be more likely to engage in other habits that are beneficial for the brain.

Although the findings are encouraging, the researchers say that the study does not prove that learning another language directly slows brain ageing or prevents dementia. Experts say further long-term studies are needed to determine whether multilingualism can reduce the risk of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease.

Despite the need for more research, scientists say the findings offer another compelling reason to learn a new language. Whether through formal classes, language-learning apps or everyday conversations, developing language skills could provide meaningful mental stimulation throughout life.

Completing cancer treatment is often imagined as the moment life returns to normal. The final chemotherapy session ends, follow-up scans show encouraging results, and the long-awaited words, “You’re in remission,” bring immense relief. Family and friends celebrate the milestone, expecting life to pick up where it left off.

Yet for many survivors, the end of treatment marks the beginning of a different journey. The hospital visits may become less frequent, but new questions often take their place. Will energy levels ever return? Is it normal to still feel anxious before every check-up? How does one rebuild a life that has been profoundly changed by illness?

Life After Cancer

Life after cancer is not simply about surviving; it is about learning to live well again. This phase is an opportunity to focus not only on physical recovery but also on emotional healing, meaningful relationships, and rediscovering a sense of purpose. Survivorship is not defined by the absence of disease alone; it is measured by the quality of life that follows.

During treatment, every decision revolves around cancer. Appointments, medications, scans, and side effects dominate daily life. Once treatment ends, the focus gradually shifts from fighting the disease to rebuilding health and well-being. This transition, often referred to as survivorship care, is about moving from crisis management to long-term wellness.

The goal is no longer simply to eliminate cancer cells, but to create a life that feels fulfilling and meaningful. Survivors are encouraged to focus on three things treatment itself cannot provide: strength, joy, and a renewed sense of control.

Quality of life after cancer extends far beyond follow-up scans and medical reports. It encompasses physical, emotional, social, and practical well-being. Paying attention to each of these areas can help survivors thrive rather than merely cope.

Physical Recovery After Cancer Treatment

Physically, the body often needs time to recover from the effects of chemotherapy, surgery, radiation, or hormone therapy. Fatigue, reduced stamina, neuropathy, weight changes, and muscle loss are common challenges. Regular movement plays a critical role in recovery.

Experts recommend at least 150 minutes of moderate exercise each week, along with two sessions of strength training to rebuild muscle and improve energy levels. For survivors experiencing lymphedema, pelvic floor concerns, or mobility limitations, working with a physiotherapist can provide targeted support. A balanced diet rich in protein also helps restore strength and independence.

Emotional Recovery Post Cancer Treatment

Emotional recovery deserves equal attention. Fear of recurrence, anxiety before follow-up scans, survivor's guilt, and grief for the life that existed before diagnosis are all common experiences.

These feelings are not symptoms of weakness; they are natural responses to a life-changing event. Seeking support from a psycho-oncologist, counsellor, or support group can significantly improve emotional well-being. Even simple practices such as mindfulness, journaling, or spending a few quiet minutes each day focusing on the present moment can help reduce stress and build resilience.

Cancer's Impact On Relationships And Financial Pressures

Cancer can also reshape relationships. Some friendships may change, while family members and partners may continue adjusting to roles they adopted during treatment.

Open conversations about needs, limitations, and expectations can help strengthen these relationships. Reconnecting with supportive people, participating in survivor communities, or mentoring newly diagnosed patients can create a sense of belonging and purpose. Healing is often easier when it happens in the company of others.

Practical concerns can persist long after treatment ends. Financial pressures, career interruptions, insurance challenges, and concerns about returning to work can affect overall well-being. Seeking guidance from social workers, financial counsellors, or patient support organizations can help survivors navigate these issues. In India, government initiatives such as Ayushman Bharat, state-level healthcare schemes, and various non-governmental organizations may offer valuable assistance.

Challenges Of Survivors

One of the greatest challenges survivors face is the expectation of returning to the person they were before cancer. However, recovery is not about going back; it is about moving forward. A new normal often emerges, the one shaped by deeper self-awareness, healthier boundaries, and a greater appreciation for everyday moments.

Many long-term survivors describe experiencing what experts call post-traumatic growth. They report stronger relationships, clearer priorities, and a renewed sense of purpose. They become more intentional about how they spend their time and energy, recognizing that health and meaningful experiences deserve as much attention as professional achievements.

The first year after treatment is a time of adjustment. Establishing healthy routines, gradually resuming work and hobbies, staying consistent with follow-up appointments, and setting goals unrelated to cancer can help restore confidence. Whether it is taking a short trip, learning a new skill, planting a garden, or simply enjoying time with loved ones, these experiences remind survivors that life extends beyond medical milestones.

Risk of New Symptoms

At the same time, wellness does not mean ignoring new symptoms. Persistent pain, unexplained weight loss, unusual bleeding, ongoing fatigue, or symptoms of anxiety and depression that last more than two weeks should be discussed with a healthcare provider. Survivorship care is an essential part of recovery, and seeking help when needed is a sign of self-care, not concern.

Cancer may have changed the course of life, but it does not define its future. The chapter after treatment may look different from the one that came before, but it can still be rich with meaning, connection, and hope.

The treatment phase was about fighting to survive. The next phase is about discovering what makes life meaningful again. It is about protecting quality of life with the same determination that carried survivors through treatment—because surviving cancer is not only about living longer, but about living well.

Millions of people around the world undergo blood tests every year to measure LDL, commonly known as "bad" cholesterol. But researchers now suggest that this standard test may not always provide the most accurate picture of heart disease risk.

A new study from Northwestern Medicine found that a blood test measuring apolipoprotein B (ApoB) may be better than LDL cholesterol testing for identifying people who need more intensive treatment to reduce their risk of heart attacks and strokes.

The researchers also found that using ApoB to guide treatment decisions could prevent more cardiovascular events while remaining cost-effective for healthcare systems. The findings were published in the journal JAMA.

"We found that ApoB testing to intensify cholesterol-lowering medication would prevent more heart attacks and strokes than current practice, and that these health benefits were achieved at a cost that represents good value for US healthcare payers," said study lead author Ciaran Kohli-Lynch, Assistant Professor of Preventive Medicine in the Division of Epidemiology at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.

ApoB vs LDL: What's the Difference?

Also read: Confused By Your Cholesterol Report? Here's What LDL And ApoB Really Mean

Doctors have traditionally relied on LDL ("bad") cholesterol and non-HDL cholesterol levels to assess heart disease risk and decide when patients should begin or intensify cholesterol-lowering treatment. While these tests provide useful information, researchers say they do not tell the whole story.

The difference lies in what the two tests measure:

• LDL cholesterol test: Measures the amount of LDL cholesterol in the blood.
• ApoB test: Measures the number of cholesterol-carrying particles—including LDL and other potentially harmful particles—that can enter artery walls and contribute to plaque buildup.

"Research strongly shows that apolipoprotein B (ApoB) is better at identifying who is at risk because it counts the total number of harmful particles in the blood," Kohli-Lynch said.

According to the researchers, the number of harmful particles may provide a more accurate measure of cardiovascular risk than LDL cholesterol levels alone.

What Is ApoB?

Read More: US Cardiologist Explains Why 2026 AHA Cholesterol Guidelines Recommend Starting Young

In a post on X, Dr. Sudhir, Senior Consultant Neurologist at the Institute of Neurosciences, Apollo Hospitals, Hyderabad, explained that ApoB is a protein found on potentially harmful cholesterol-carrying particles such as LDL and VLDL (very low-density lipoprotein).

"Think of ApoB as a count of the particles capable of entering artery walls and causing plaque. One ApoB is equal to one potentially harmful particle," he said.

Dr. Sudhir explained that two people can have the same LDL cholesterol level but very different numbers of cholesterol-carrying particles. The person with more particles will usually have a higher ApoB level and, potentially, a greater risk of cardiovascular disease.

He added that ApoB often provides a more accurate assessment of heart disease risk than LDL cholesterol alone.

Despite growing evidence supporting ApoB, the test is still not widely used in routine clinical practice because it generally requires an additional blood test beyond the standard cholesterol panel, increasing both cost and inconvenience.

"Our study asked: Is it worth spending extra money to use ApoB instead of LDL to guide treatment intensification?" Kohli-Lynch said.

Dr. Sudhir suggested that ApoB testing should be considered for:

• people with diabetes,
• prediabetes,
• metabolic syndrome,
• obesity,
• elevated triglycerides,
• strong family history of heart disease.

New Cholesterol Guidelines

Earlier this year, the American Heart Association and 10 other medical organisations released updated guidelines recommending that many people begin cholesterol-lowering therapy at younger ages.

"This means it is increasingly important to accurately identify who would benefit most from intensive treatment," Kohli-Lynch said.

The updated guidelines also recommend measuring ApoB, particularly in people with high triglycerides, diabetes or in situations where LDL cholesterol levels may underestimate the number of harmful cholesterol-carrying particles.