Can Damaged Sperm Lead To Pregnancy Complications?
Pregnancy is usually a time of happiness and hope, but it also brings in the unexpected. While there is much talk placed on the health of the expectant mother, the quality sperm coming from the father could dramatically change the outcome of pregnancy. The latest study suggests the risks of sperm DNA damage, even increasing the risks of complications preeclampsia and birth prematurity.
In a groundbreaking research study conducted by scientists from Lund University in Sweden, scientists discovered that DNA damage in sperm increases the risk almost up to double that of preeclampsia, this is a dangerous condition that may arise during pregnancies characterized by high blood pressure. In addition, DNA anomalies also increase the risk of premature births, and this further entails increased related adverse health outcomes for infants born through such conditions.
The next step would be to find out which group of men respond best to methods to prevent and treat sperm DNA damage, and to test these methods to prevent pregnancy complications," said Dr. Amelie Stenqvist, a lecturer at Lund University. According to this study, a significant message is put forward that paternal health assumes an important role in a successful pregnancy.
It focused its research on men, specifically whose sperm contained high levels of DNA fragmentation. For instance, some 20% to 30% of babies born via in vitro fertilization have fathers whose sperm contains damaged DNA. The DNA fragmentation index, an indicator to assess the percentage of DNA damage in sperm, indicated that when the percentage of sperm with a DFI above 30% was observed, they had almost no chance of resulting in natural conception. Even a DFI greater than 20% showed that the chances of getting pregnant are highly risky as the risk factor for pregnancy complications like preeclampsia is much high.
Uncommon Complications during Pregnancy
The most alarming complication during pregnancy is preeclampsia. It affects approximately 5% to 8% of pregnancies worldwide, which can cause fatal conditions for both the mother and the baby. The new findings now point out that sperm DNA damage may contribute to this condition, especially if it is due to assisted reproductive techniques such as IVF pregnancies. The research found that a DFI above 20% doubled the risk of preeclampsia from a mere 5% to almost 11% per.
Apart from causing preeclampsia, DNA fragmentation in sperm is also known to increase the risk for prematurity. Most premature babies experience respiratory, neurological, and developmental complications. Therefore, some degree of early intervention might be important for prospective parents.
Some of the rarer, though serious complications include placental abruption, which is the separation of the placenta from the uterine wall and intrauterine growth restriction, a condition by which the baby does not grow normally in the womb. These conditions though rare are potentially catastrophic both to the mother and the child. Results from this study may help in establishing the contribution of the father in such pregnancies.
Further study into sperm DNA damage is of urgent interest with regard to its consequences for pregnancy outcomes. According to Professor Aleksander Giwercman of Lund University in the field of Reproductive Medicine, "the analysis of DFI should be introduced as routine test in all fertility clinics.". "It could give answers to couples who are having difficulties with infertility, but our latest result also shows that DFI analysis can be a method to identify high-risk pregnancies, explained Giwercman.
For many, DNA fragmentation in sperm is often treatable. Common causes are oxidative stress, age, smoking, being obese, and infections. Addressing these elements will likely reduce DNA damage in sperm for men, raising the chances for a healthy pregnancy and baby.
Overall, the study importance should take into consideration paternal as well as maternal health towards reaching for a healthy pregnancy. Though DNA fragmentation in the sperm is supposed to increase the risk factors for complications in pregnancies, the advances into novel treatment approaches and tests are likely to alleviate complications in many families. Thus the findings of this study offer optimism and pave a pathway to more holistic fertility treatments in the future.
Credit: AI
For many women, menopause can bring a string of uncomfortable symptoms like hot flashes, sleep problems, changing body composition and weight gain.
Now, researchers are looking at whether combining GLP-1-based weight-loss medicines with menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) could offer greater benefits, particularly for women struggling with obesity after menopause.
A recent Mayo Clinic study, published in The Lancet Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Women's Health, found that postmenopausal women taking tirzepatide along with hormone therapy lost about 35% more weight than those taking tirzepatide alone.
Researchers studied 120 postmenopausal women with overweight or obesity who had been taking tirzepatide for at least 12 months. Forty women were also using MHT, while 80 were not.
Women taking both treatments lost around 17-19% of their body weight, compared with about 14% among those taking tirzepatide alone. About 45% of women on the combination achieved at least 20% weight loss, compared with 18% in the tirzepatide-only group.
“This study provides important insights for developing more effective and personalized strategies for managing cardiometabolic risk in postmenopausal women,” said Dr Regina Castaneda, first author and Mayo Clinic researcher.
However, this was just an observation in the study, not a randomized clinical trial. Therefore, it cannot prove that hormone therapy itself caused the additional weight loss.
“It is possible that women using hormone therapy were already engaged in healthier behaviors, or that menopause symptom relief improved sleep and quality of life,” said Dr Maria Daniela Hurtado Andrade, senior author of the study.
Also read: Postmenopausal Women May Face More Severe Dry Eye Disease; How Do Hormones Contribute?
During menopause, declining oestrogen levels can change fat distribution, appetite, metabolism and muscle mass. GLP-1 medicines, meanwhile, reduce appetite and slow stomach emptying, helping with weight management.
Researchers believe there could also be a biological interaction between oestrogen and GLP-1 signalling. “Preclinical data suggest a potential synergy, with estrogen appearing to enhance the appetite-suppressing effects of GLP-1,” Castaneda said.
Earlier research has also suggested greater weight loss among postmenopausal women using semaglutide alongside hormone therapy.
A 2026 review similarly concluded that GLP-1 medicines may help reduce weight and abdominal fat in menopausal women, but larger studies are needed.
Also read: Experimental Menopause Drug Shows Promise Mid-Stage Trial, Reduces Hot Flashes By 83%
GLP-1 medicines may cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, constipation, abdominal pain and reduced appetite. These effects often surface when the dose is increased.
Hormone therapy has its own side-effects and it is also not suitable for everyone. Depending on the patient's medical history, MHT can increase the risk of complications like blood clots and stroke.
Hormone therapy should not be started simply to fuel weight loss from a GLP-1 drug. It is primarily used to treat certain menopause symptoms and should be prescribed after considering a woman's age, symptoms, medical history and individual risks.
As Hurtado Andrade noted, researchers now want to determine whether the combination offers benefits beyond weight loss, including improvements in cardiometabolic health.
Credit: AI
It can be confusing and sometimes alarming to receive different thyroid test results from two different laboratories, especially when both tests are done on the same day. A slight difference in values does not necessarily mean that your thyroid function has suddenly changed. In many cases, the variation is due to differences in how the tests are performed rather than a change in your health.
One of the biggest reasons for varying results is the laboratory itself. Accredited laboratories, such as NABL-certified labs, follow stringent quality-control measures, use standardised testing protocols and have trained personnel to handle samples correctly. Laboratories with less rigorous quality standards may produce results that are less consistent.
The equipment and testing methods used can also differ from one laboratory to another. Different analysers, calibration techniques and testing kits can produce slightly different values for thyroid hormones such as TSH, T3, T4, Free T3 and Free T4.
Even the reference ranges printed on reports may not be identical because each laboratory establishes its own normal range based on the equipment used and the population it serves.
Also read: UK Approves Eli Lilly’s Foundayo: Is the GLP-1 Pill Better Than Wegovy, Mounjaro?
The timing of the test is another important factor. Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) naturally fluctuates throughout the day. It is generally higher during the early hours of the morning and gradually falls as the day progresses.
As a result, a blood sample collected in the afternoon may show a lower TSH level than one collected early in the morning.
Lifestyle and biological factors can also influence thyroid hormone levels. Stress, poor sleep, recent illness, medications and even eating before the test may affect the results.
For people taking thyroid medication, blood samples should ideally be collected in the morning on an empty stomach and before taking the daily dose. Testing after medication may temporarily alter hormone levels and make interpretation more difficult.
Also read: Why Women Want Hormonal Health Care, Not Just Pregnancy Care
Certain supplements and medications can interfere with thyroid tests as well. Biotin, commonly found in hair and nail supplements, can falsely lower TSH levels while increasing Free T3 and Free T4 values.
Medications such as amiodarone, glucocorticoids, dopamine and heparin may also affect thyroid hormone measurements. During pregnancy, hormonal changes, particularly increased levels of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), can naturally alter TSH values.
Laboratory handling also plays a role. Delays in processing, improper storage temperatures, differences in centrifugation timing or sample-handling errors can influence the final result.
In some individuals, thyroid autoantibodies may interfere with laboratory assays, potentially leading to inaccurate Free T3 and Free T4 measurements.
Also read: Silent Neck Swellings: Why An Unusual Lump Should Never Be Ignored
Because of these variables, experts recommend getting thyroid tests done at the same accredited laboratory whenever possible. This allows doctors to compare results more reliably over time.
If a thyroid value is only mildly abnormal or falls within a borderline range, it may often be advisable to repeat the test before making a diagnosis or starting lifelong medication.
Ultimately, thyroid test reports should never be interpreted in isolation. Doctors consider the patient's symptoms, medical history, physical examination and repeat test results before deciding on treatment.
Consistency in where and how the test is performed can help avoid unnecessary anxiety and support more accurate clinical decisions.
By Dr Shaheen Guy, General Physician, Saifee Hospital, Mumbai
Credit: AI
Robotic surgery has rapidly become one of the most talked-about advances in modern medicine. Yet, for many patients, the technology remains misunderstood.
The first thing to know is that the robot does not perform the operation. Every movement is directed by the surgeon. The robotic platform translates the surgeon’s hand movements into highly precise, tremor-filtered movements inside the body while providing magnified three-dimensional vision and greater instrument dexterity.
The real question, therefore, is not whether robotic surgery is better. It is whether it is the right choice for a particular patient, procedure and surgeon.
For many routine operations, conventional laparoscopy may achieve equally good outcomes. Technology should support clinical judgment, not replace it.
Patients should also recognise that outcomes depend far more on the experience of the surgical team than on the robotic system itself. Successful robotic surgery requires specialised training, structured credentialing and a coordinated operating theatre team.
Choosing an experienced surgeon can therefore be more important than choosing a hospital simply because it owns a robotic system.
Another important development is that robotic surgery is becoming more accessible. Indigenous platforms are helping expand advanced surgical care beyond a handful of metropolitan hospitals by making robotic programmes more viable for a wider range of healthcare institutions.
This gradual decentralisation means patients in Tier II and Tier III cities can increasingly access advanced minimally invasive surgery closer to home, reducing the need to travel long distances for specialised treatment.
Also read: Osteoporosis Drugs Offer New Hope For Back Pain By Blocking Disc Mineralisation: Study
Innovation is also extending beyond the operating room. Robotic telesurgery, demonstrated successfully using Made-in-India robotic platforms, has shown that expert surgeons can operate across vast distances using secure digital networks.
While widespread adoption will require robust infrastructure and regulatory frameworks, the technology represents an important step towards improving access to specialised surgical expertise.
Patients should look beyond the hype and ask informed questions:
With indigenous platforms helping decentralise robotic surgery, advanced care is becoming more accessible beyond major metros. The technology has also demonstrated the potential of interhospital telesurgery, enabling expert surgeons to operate across distances and potentially helping bridge gaps in access to highly skilled surgical expertise.
Ultimately, the future of surgery will not be shaped by machines alone. It will be shaped by skilled surgeons using intelligent technology to deliver safer, more precise and equitable patient care.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited