Bone Health In Older Adults (Credit-Canva)
Strengthening your bones is not something that can happen overnight, it takes years for your body to build strong bones and even then, it is natural for them to lose their dexterity. All you can do is keep your body healthy to make sure it is prepared for any unexpected situations. For years, many older adults have been told to take vitamin D and calcium supplements to keep their bones strong and prevent falls. However, a new report from U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) is changing that advice. This report suggests that for most older people, these supplements don't actually prevent falls or broken bones. This might be surprising news, we must understand why falls happen more often as we age, what vitamin D and calcium do in the body, and most importantly, what you can do to stay safe and prevent fractures.
According to the report, vitamin D supplements don't seem to help prevent falls or broken bones for most people over 60. They also found that these supplements, especially with calcium, might increase the risk of kidney stones. This report doesn't mean people with weak bones (osteoporosis), low vitamin D, or who take vitamin D for other health reasons shouldn't take it. It just means that for most healthy older people, these supplements don't prevent falls and fractures.
There are many reasons why older people are more prone to breaking their bones. Our bones are strongest when we're in our 20s and 30s, and they get weaker as we age so naturally, they can break easily. It can also be harder to move around as we get older, sometimes because of problems like arthritis this can affect how we walk and make us less steady.
There are also different issues like neuropathy, which is a nerve problem that can also make it harder to feel your feet and keep your balance. Eyesight is also a culprit as it can cause you to feel dizzy and fall. Some medicines can also make people feel unsteady, and older people often take more medicines than younger people. Low vitamin D itself can also increase the risk of falls, so keeping vitamin D levels up is still important.
USPSTF recommends a few better ways to protect your bone health and prevent broken bones and falls.
Regular walks strengthen your muscles and bones, which helps you stay steady on your feet. It is as simple as practice makes perfect so the more you walk, the better it is. Walking also improves your balance, making you less likely to fall.
Strength training, like lifting weights or using resistance bands, makes your bones stronger and helps prevent fractures if you do fall. It is like a safety cushion, but you must be careful while doing so because it can lead to injuries if done too much.
Activities like tai chi, Pilates, and yoga can improve your balance and coordination, making you more stable and less prone to falls. These can also help you improve your muscle flexibility and strength that in turn helps your body be stronger.
If you have osteoporosis, talk to your doctor about medications that can help strengthen your bones and lower your risk of fractures. Many medications can also have unsavory side effects like weakened joints, losing muscle strength, etc.
A proper diet goes a long way when it comes to your entire body health. So to keep up with your body’s nutrition and muscle health, eat more protein along with a balanced meal that includes loads of fiber, healthy fats and carbs.
Having poor eyesight can be difficult, not only does it make life difficult without glasses, but it also increases the possibilities of getting into minor accidents like bumping into people and missing objects placed in front of us.
Getting enough sleep is also important because when you are not sleeping, you get disoriented and can ignore even obvious things like the last stair in the staircase. Make sure you get enough sleep to keep you fresh and focused.
There are many things that can cause you to have accidents, even in your home. To avoid such falls, make sure there are no lose ends like crooked floor panels, rugs that are sticking out or protruding furniture that can hurt your knees
Credits: Canva and Piktochart
In June 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, overturning the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that had established a constitutional right to abortion. With the Dobbs ruling, the authority to regulate abortion returned to individual states—setting off a wave of legislative action that continues to reshape access to abortion care across the country.
Three years later, the national abortion landscape is more fragmented than ever. Some states have implemented near-total bans, while others have enshrined protections into their constitutions. As legal battles unfold and ballot measures continue to appear, access to abortion has become heavily dependent on geography.
As of mid-2025, abortion is nearly banned in 13 states, with limited exceptions such as life endangerment or cases of rape or incest.
In over 25 other states, gestational limits range from six to 26 weeks. These restrictions are particularly concentrated in the South and Midwest, where legislative action following the Dobbs decision was swift.
Conversely, several states have moved to protect or expand abortion rights.
Since 2022, voters in California, Michigan, Ohio, and Vermont have passed constitutional amendments guaranteeing the right to abortion.
In states like Kansas, Kentucky, and Montana, voters rejected ballot measures that would have added new abortion restrictions.
In Missouri—a state that implemented one of the country’s strictest abortion bans immediately after the Dobbs ruling—voters passed a measure in 2024 to enshrine abortion access in the state constitution.
However, that decision was followed by further legal disputes. The Missouri Supreme Court later blocked abortion access again, and lawmakers have approved another referendum for 2026 that could reverse the constitutional amendment.
As access has narrowed in certain states, more people are traveling long distances to obtain abortion care. According to data from The Brigid Alliance, an organization that provides travel and logistical support to abortion-seekers, average travel distances have increased nearly 50% since the Dobbs ruling. Today, many patients are traveling more than 1,400 miles round trip to reach a provider.
The group also reports that average travel-related expenses have risen to more than $2,300 per patient—reflecting the rising cost of transportation, lodging, and time away from work. The majority of their clients seeking assistance now come from states like Texas, Florida, Georgia, and North Carolina, where laws have become increasingly restrictive.
Southern states, in particular, have emerged as areas where abortion access is most limited. For example, Florida implemented a six-week abortion ban after a proposed constitutional amendment to protect abortion access narrowly failed, receiving just under the 60% threshold required for passage. This has redirected patients to other states with more permissive laws, such as Virginia.
Since the Dobbs ruling, many abortion-related measures have appeared on state ballots—either to protect or restrict access. In 2024 alone, voters in Arizona, Colorado, Maryland, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, and New York took up initiatives involving abortion rights. Most successful measures focused on preserving access until fetal viability, generally considered to occur around 24 weeks of pregnancy.
Not all efforts to expand abortion rights have succeeded. In Nebraska, voters faced competing ballot measures—one aiming to restrict abortion after the first trimester (which passed) and another to guarantee abortion access up to fetal viability (which failed). South Dakota also rejected a measure to protect abortion rights.
Three years after Dobbs, the U.S. remains sharply divided on abortion access, with legal and political fights continuing to play out across state lines. As more ballot measures are introduced and court rulings evolve, the future of abortion rights in America remains uncertain—shaped less by federal law than by the individual choices of state governments and their voters.
Credits: Canva
A new study published in the Journal of the American Chemical Society offers critical insight into the biological mechanisms underlying type 2 diabetes. Researchers from the Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IIT Bombay), in collaboration with IIT Kanpur and the Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute (CNCI), Kolkata, have identified a key trigger that accelerates the progression of this widespread disease: the structural protein collagen I.
Type 2 diabetes currently affects over 500 million people worldwide, and numbers are expected to rise sharply in the coming decades. The disease is primarily driven by a combination of genetics, lifestyle factors, and complex cellular mechanisms. At its core lies the dysfunction of pancreatic β-cells, the insulin-producing cells responsible for regulating blood sugar levels.
As diabetes develops, β-cells either fail to produce enough insulin or the body’s cells become resistant to it. A lesser-known yet crucial hormone, amylin, is also secreted by these β-cells and plays a vital role in managing blood sugar after meals. However, in diabetic conditions, excessive amylin production leads to misfolding and toxic clumping, which damages β-cells and accelerates disease progression.
In the latest study, the research team pinpointed fibrillar collagen I, a common component of the extracellular matrix, as a key factor driving the toxic aggregation of amylin. Found abundantly in connective tissues like skin and bones, collagen I is also present in the pancreatic environment—particularly in diabetic tissues where it is elevated.
“Every tissue is composed of cells and an extracellular matrix that provides structural support. In diabetic pancreatic tissue, this matrix, especially collagen I, becomes more prominent,” explained Prof. Shamik Sen, the study’s lead investigator from the Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering at IIT Bombay.
The researchers discovered that collagen I acts like a scaffold or platform, accelerating the misfolding and aggregation of amylin, which in turn damages β-cells. This discovery adds a new layer to understanding why the disease worsens over time, even with treatments targeting cellular pathways.
To investigate how collagen I interacts with amylin, the team used a suite of advanced biophysical tools. These included surface plasmon resonance to measure binding strength, atomic force microscopy to study molecular adhesion, thioflavin T fluorescence to track aggregation speed, and NMR spectroscopy to identify interacting regions of the molecules.
“Amylin almost coats the collagen fibres, forming stable, toxic aggregates that cells struggle to clear,” said Prof. Sen. The behavior of amylin on collagen fibres resembled trains moving on tracks—quickly and with destructive momentum.
Computer simulations by Prof. Prasenjit Bhaumik’s group at IIT Bombay confirmed that fibrillar collagen I accelerates the toxic aggregation process, offering further validation of the molecular interaction.
The team extended their study to biological samples from diabetic mice and humans. With the help of Prof. Hamim Zafar and Prof. Sai Prasad Pydi from IIT Kanpur, and Dr. Sankhadeep Dutta from CNCI, they analyzed single-cell data and tissue architecture.
The findings were striking: as diabetes progressed, both collagen and amylin levels rose, accompanied by damage to pancreatic islets—clusters of cells that house insulin-producing β-cells.
To test the functional impact, the researchers grew lab-engineered β-cells on collagen gels containing amylin. These cells showed increased oxidative stress, reduced insulin production, and higher rates of cell death, compared to controls grown without collagen or amylin.
This suggests that the extracellular environment, particularly collagen I, plays a central role in worsening β-cell dysfunction in diabetes.
The findings could explain why many diabetes treatments fall short—they overlook the external microenvironment contributing to disease progression. “Unless we disrupt the interaction between amylin and collagen, we may not be able to eliminate the toxic pancreatic environment,” said Prof. Sen.
Looking ahead, the team is working on cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) models to visualize how amylin and collagen interact at the molecular level. They are also exploring 3D tissue engineering strategies to restore pancreatic function by replicating healthy extracellular conditions.
Credits Canva
As wildfires become an all-too-familiar headline across the globe, their visible devastation—scorched forests, lost homes, and displaced communities—often overshadows a more insidious threat: the impact of wildfire smoke on human health. While the immediate dangers of flames and evacuations are clear, a new study published in Nature Medicine reveals that wildfire smoke does far more than irritate eyes and throats. It can fundamentally alter the immune system, potentially making people more susceptible to illness long after the smoke has cleared.
The study, led by researchers from the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, found that people exposed to wildfire smoke exhibit changes in gene expression and immune function, even if they’re otherwise healthy. This suggests that the health consequences of wildfires may extend far beyond the immediate coughing, wheezing, and watery eyes that so many experience during fire season.
The research, led by Dr. Kari Nadeau of the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, provides the most detailed look yet at how wildfire smoke affects the body on a cellular level. By analyzing blood samples from 31 firefighters and civilians exposed to wildfire smoke and comparing them to 29 unexposed individuals, the study uncovered a complex web of immune changes.
People exposed to wildfire smoke showed a marked increase in memory immune cells—cells that typically provide long-term immunity. At first glance, this might seem beneficial, but the study also found elevated biomarkers of inflammation and immune activity, as well as changes in dozens of genes linked to allergies and asthma. In short, the immune system was not just activated—it was thrown into overdrive, potentially increasing vulnerability to illness.
Dr. Mary Johnson, the study’s lead researcher, explains, “Our findings demonstrate that the immune system is extremely sensitive to environmental exposures like fire smoke, even in healthy individuals. Knowing exactly how may help us detect immune dysfunction from smoke exposure earlier and could pave the way for new therapeutics to mitigate, or prevent altogether, the health effects of smoke exposure and environmental contaminants.”
Wildfire smoke is a toxic brew. It contains:
The ultra-fine PM2.5 particles are particularly dangerous. At less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter, they are 28 times smaller than the width of a human hair and can be inhaled deep into the lungs, enter the bloodstream, and affect organs throughout the body.
“These findings suggest that even short-term exposure to wildfire smoke can act as a biological stressor with long-lasting effects,” said Dr. Mary Johnson, lead researcher and environmental health scientist at Harvard. “That’s especially concerning as wildfire seasons grow longer and smoke plumes travel farther.”
One of the most striking findings of the study was the alteration of 133 genes related to allergies and asthma in those exposed to wildfire smoke. This genetic shift may help explain why people living in wildfire-prone areas often report more respiratory problems, even months after the fires have ended.
The study also found that smoke-exposed individuals had more immune cells affected by toxic metals, further increasing inflammation and the risk of immune dysfunction. These changes may make people more susceptible to infections, worsen existing respiratory conditions, and potentially contribute to the development of new allergies or asthma.
The United States, particularly western states like California, has witnessed a dramatic increase in wildfire frequency and severity. In 2023 alone, California experienced over 7,000 wildfires, with the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection responding to nearly 590,000 related emergencies. The devastating January 2025 fire in Los Angeles County, which claimed 30 lives and scorched 40,000 acres, underscored the deadly toll of these disasters.
Climate change is a major driver, creating hotter, drier conditions that fuel longer and more intense fire seasons. As wildfires become more common, understanding and mitigating the health risks of smoke exposure is more urgent than ever.
Wildfire smoke can trigger a range of symptoms, from burning eyes and runny noses to persistent coughs and breathing difficulties. For people with pre-existing conditions like asthma, COPD, or eczema, exposure can lead to dangerous flare-ups.
But the risks extend beyond the lungs. Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) can enter the bloodstream, causing inflammation throughout the body. Studies have linked wildfire smoke to increased emergency room visits for heart attacks and coronary heart disease within 24 hours of exposure. There is also emerging evidence that PM2.5 can impair cognitive functions such as memory and attention, likely by inducing inflammation in the brain.
Experts emphasize the need for proactive measures as wildfire season peaks:
If evacuation orders are issued, follow them promptly—not just for safety from flames, but from the health threats the smoke carries.
As wildfires continue to reshape landscapes and communities, their invisible legacy—on our immune systems and overall health—demands urgent attention. The message from scientists is clear: wildfire smoke is not just an environmental nuisance, but a profound health hazard that can affect anyone, anywhere the wind blows. Proactive measures, informed guidelines, and continued research are essential to protect public health in an increasingly fiery world.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited