Bone Health In Older Adults (Credit-Canva)
Strengthening your bones is not something that can happen overnight, it takes years for your body to build strong bones and even then, it is natural for them to lose their dexterity. All you can do is keep your body healthy to make sure it is prepared for any unexpected situations. For years, many older adults have been told to take vitamin D and calcium supplements to keep their bones strong and prevent falls. However, a new report from U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) is changing that advice. This report suggests that for most older people, these supplements don't actually prevent falls or broken bones. This might be surprising news, we must understand why falls happen more often as we age, what vitamin D and calcium do in the body, and most importantly, what you can do to stay safe and prevent fractures.
According to the report, vitamin D supplements don't seem to help prevent falls or broken bones for most people over 60. They also found that these supplements, especially with calcium, might increase the risk of kidney stones. This report doesn't mean people with weak bones (osteoporosis), low vitamin D, or who take vitamin D for other health reasons shouldn't take it. It just means that for most healthy older people, these supplements don't prevent falls and fractures.
There are many reasons why older people are more prone to breaking their bones. Our bones are strongest when we're in our 20s and 30s, and they get weaker as we age so naturally, they can break easily. It can also be harder to move around as we get older, sometimes because of problems like arthritis this can affect how we walk and make us less steady.
There are also different issues like neuropathy, which is a nerve problem that can also make it harder to feel your feet and keep your balance. Eyesight is also a culprit as it can cause you to feel dizzy and fall. Some medicines can also make people feel unsteady, and older people often take more medicines than younger people. Low vitamin D itself can also increase the risk of falls, so keeping vitamin D levels up is still important.
USPSTF recommends a few better ways to protect your bone health and prevent broken bones and falls.
Regular walks strengthen your muscles and bones, which helps you stay steady on your feet. It is as simple as practice makes perfect so the more you walk, the better it is. Walking also improves your balance, making you less likely to fall.
Strength training, like lifting weights or using resistance bands, makes your bones stronger and helps prevent fractures if you do fall. It is like a safety cushion, but you must be careful while doing so because it can lead to injuries if done too much.
Activities like tai chi, Pilates, and yoga can improve your balance and coordination, making you more stable and less prone to falls. These can also help you improve your muscle flexibility and strength that in turn helps your body be stronger.
If you have osteoporosis, talk to your doctor about medications that can help strengthen your bones and lower your risk of fractures. Many medications can also have unsavory side effects like weakened joints, losing muscle strength, etc.
A proper diet goes a long way when it comes to your entire body health. So to keep up with your body’s nutrition and muscle health, eat more protein along with a balanced meal that includes loads of fiber, healthy fats and carbs.
Having poor eyesight can be difficult, not only does it make life difficult without glasses, but it also increases the possibilities of getting into minor accidents like bumping into people and missing objects placed in front of us.
Getting enough sleep is also important because when you are not sleeping, you get disoriented and can ignore even obvious things like the last stair in the staircase. Make sure you get enough sleep to keep you fresh and focused.
There are many things that can cause you to have accidents, even in your home. To avoid such falls, make sure there are no lose ends like crooked floor panels, rugs that are sticking out or protruding furniture that can hurt your knees
Credits: Canva
Delhi woke up again to a thick layer of smog, with Delhi's AQI hovering over 300 on the Air Quality Index on Thursday morning under "very poor" category. After a long nine-day wait, city's AQI had slipped under "poor" category on Tuesday, but it is again back on the "very poor" category, while on Wednesday, there were strong winds that dispersed the pollutants. Yet the condition of the air quality remains bad.
As a result of this many people are leaving the city, or have at least considered leaving the city.
Nikita Singh, 31, who runs a remote PR boutique agency was living in Delhi on and off for two years because it was two years back when she struggled to breathe during Delhi winters. "The pollution levels were so extreme that I felt breathless and constantly fatigued. That was the first time I seriously questioned whether I could continue living here long-term," she says.
For the first two years, she kept "oscillating". "I would stay in Delhi for work during peak months, then leave when pollution became unbearable, especially from November to January. Every return felt heavier. I had my eyes burning, headaches, chest tightness and a general feeling of 'I cannot do this forever'."
She has now permanent moved away from Delhi to Jodhpur, in Rajasthan, where she works remotely. However, it has not been easy on her. "Emotionally, it was tough because Delhi had become familiar, and my life and work circle were mostly based there," she says. However, thanks to her fully remote work and that fact that she had decided to prioritize her health, she was able to make the move.
She says that Jodhpur offers the cleaner air which she "never felt in Delhi". Her decision to move also came with her family uprooting from Delhi. "My family and I shifted together. AQI was a major trigger. We realized we could not keep exposing ourselves to those levels of pollution year after year," she reveals.
She is not alone, Vikash Makkar, a freelance linguist specialist and a journalist, who had been living in Delhi from the last 12 years, moved back to his hometown in Jamshedpur. "Since October with an unplanned journey, I moved to my hometown and have been living there. It is quite relaxed here as compared to Delhi's ongoing pollution crisis that I had faced," he shares.
29-year-old Riya Baibhawi also uprooted from the city. She had been living in Delhi from last 5 years. She is currently living in Ludhiana, Punjab, and her decision to leave city is also affected by the pollution. Though, it was not easy for her. "It was very tough because it was very difficult to find career opportunities with competitive salaries outside Delhi-NCR. It also required a cut down of my social life, which adversely affected my mental health," she says. She shares that one of her friends, who had been living in Noida for the last 20 years had also moved out as pollution exacerbated her asthma.
Another family, who have been living in Delhi's Karol Bagh for more than two decades now are considering moving out of Delhi. "They are looking for properties outside Delhi where air is cleaner," shares their 26-year-old daughter who now lives in her marital home in Noida.
As per a survey by a consumer insights platform Smytten PulseAI, about 34.6% of the residents surveyed in Delhi NCR have considered to move out of the city due to worsening air. A 2023 study published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health shows that if the level of PM2.5 increases by 10µg/m3, migrants coming into the city will be reduced by 21.2%. While migration in the city has been ongoing, pollution does show some strains of people moving out of the city.
As per the Air Quality Life Index released by the Energy Policy Institute at the University of Chicago (EPIC), the fine particulate matter or PM2.5 in air will shorten an average Indian's life expectancy by 5.3 years, and in Delhi, it could shorten a person's life span by 11.9 years. However, the Union government has said in the parliament that there is "no conclusive national data to establish a direct correlation between deaths or diseases occurring exclusively due to air pollution". This statement comes at a time when doctors themselves noted a surge in cases due to pollution and have urged people to leave the cities.
Credits: Canva
The internet is obsessing with the idea that Japan has a fat law, it fines people for being "fat". Talk about sensational headlines, mistranslations, and social media exaggerations. But what does Japan's so-called 'fat law' actually say? Does it really change anything?
Health and Me did a closer fact check on Japan's Fat Law, and here is what we found.
In 2008, the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare introduced the Metabolic Syndrome Countermeasures Promotion Law, which was popularly nicknamed the 'Metabo Law'. the word 'metabo' comes from metabolic syndrome, a cluster of high-risk conditions that include elevated blood pressure, high blood sugar, abnormal cholesterol, and excess fat around the waist. If left untreated, this could increase the risk of heart attacks, stroke and diabetes.
The law's main focus is on identifying these risks as early as possible. As part of Japan's long-standing annual health check tradition, about 50 to 56 million adults aged 40 to 74 undergo this mandatory waist measurements every year. The waistline thresholds are:
While the numbers are not arbitrary, they match the International Diabetes Federation's guidelines used to screen metabolic risks.
The Times-Union fact check confirms: "Japanese citizens cannot be fined or imprisoned for being overweight". RosePlus Japan also reports that the term "fat tax is a mistranslation and that "it is not illegal to be fat in Japan".
The law basically shifts the responsibility away from individuals to governments and employers.
Annual measurement: Employers and local authorities measure the waistlines of eligible adults.
If someone exceeds the limit:
No individual penalties: There is no fine for not losing weight.
Employer penalties:
This structure makes the Metabo Law more of a workplace wellness mandate than a personal weight regulation.
Much of the misunderstanding comes from how Japanese concepts were translated in English. With the word "law" being reported internationally, it implied a strict legal prohibition.
"Metabo" was incorrectly equated was being "fat", losing its medical meaning.
However, there have been things that changed since 2008. This includes companies offering nutrition workshops, physical activity support, health check programs for employees and their families. The annual health checks are now more structured. People flagged for metabolic syndrome were connected with counselling and monitoring, which can reduce long-term medical costs. The conversation has now also shifted towards body autonomy, public health and role of employers in personal wellness.
Credits: Canva
In a what doctors call an "exceptionally rare event', a Michigan man has died of rabies after receiving a kidney from a donor who was unknowingly infected with the virus. A recent report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) gives information on how this rare medical event took place, with a surprising chain of exposures that vegan with a skunk scratch.
The Michigan patient underwent a kidney transplant at an Ohio hospital in December 2024. For several weeks, he seemed to be recovering normally. About five weeks after the procedure, he suddenly developed worrying symptoms such as tremors, weakness in his lower limbs, confusion and urinary incontinence. His condition deteriorated quickly and he was admitted to the hospital, soon requiring ventilation. Despite treatment, he passed away. Postmortem tests confirmed that he had rabies, a diagnosis that shocked doctors since his family said he had not been around any animals.
The unexpected diagnosis pushed doctors to take another look at the kidney donor, a man from Idaho. In the Donor Risk Assessment Interview, he had mentioned that a skunk had scratched him. At the time, this detail did not raise major concern. When investigators spoke to the donor’s family again, they learned more about the incident. A couple of months before his death, the donor had been holding a kitten in a shed on his rural property when a skunk approached and behaved aggressively. He stepped in to protect the kitten and managed to knock the skunk unconscious. Before that happened, the animal scratched his shin deeply enough to draw blood. He believed he had not been bitten, and the incident was never viewed as a medical emergency.
Around five weeks after the skunk encounter, the donor began showing symptoms that closely resemble rabies. He became confused and had trouble swallowing and walking. His family said he experienced hallucinations and complained of a stiff neck. Two days later, he was found unresponsive at home after what was believed to be a cardiac arrest. He was resuscitated and hospitalized but never regained consciousness. He was declared brain dead after several days, and his organs, including his left kidney, were donated.
Once rabies was detected in the kidney recipient, authorities examined stored laboratory samples from the donor. These tests were initially negative. However, kidney biopsy samples revealed a strain that matched silver-haired bat rabies. This finding suggested that the donor had in fact died of rabies and unknowingly passed the virus to the transplant recipient.
Investigators believe a likely three step transmission occurred. A bat infected a skunk, the skunk infected the donor, and the donor’s kidney infected the recipient. The CDC noted that only three other cases of rabies transmission through organ transplantation have been reported in the United States since 1978.
Three other people had received cornea grafts from the same donor. Once the risk was identified, the grafts were removed and all three individuals received Post Exposure Prophylaxis. They remained healthy and showed no symptoms.
Rabies is not routinely tested for in organ donors because human cases are extremely rare and difficult to diagnose. In this situation, the donor’s earlier symptoms were attributed to existing health conditions. Speaking to the New York Times, Dr Lara Danziger-Isakov said the case was exceptionally rare and reminded the public that the overall risk to transplant recipients remains very small.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited