Bird Flu Cases In US: Could It Trigger The Next Global Pandemic?
The specter of bird flu, or Avian Influenza A (H5N1), is once again looming, this time in a more ominous leap from animals to humans. As the threat level at the moment remains low, the experts are watching closely its new species and regional interventions, raising alarms about its potential to mutate into a more dangerous form. With cases flying under the radar largely, it becomes crucial to understand the trajectory of the virus, its potential risks, and preparedness challenges.
The H5N1 bird flu has evolved from being an avian problem to infecting mammals and, occasionally, humans. Recent outbreaks have affected poultry, dairy cows, and humans in several U.S. states, including California, Colorado, Michigan, Missouri, Texas, and Washington. Infections among farmworkers—mostly those milking cows or cleaning barns—have been reported, with symptoms such as eye redness, fever, sneezing, and sore throat.
Testing of 115 dairy workers from Michigan and Colorado revealed that 7% had antibodies against the H5N1 virus, indicating previous exposure. Half of these individuals reported no illness, suggesting that some infections may result in mild or even asymptomatic cases.
The behavior of H5N1 also raised red flags globally. In Cambodia, a hybrid strain between two subtypes of the virus has emerged, with at least three deaths and displaying mutations that enhance airborne transmission among mammals. These developments underscore the virus's ability to adapt, making vigilant monitoring critical.
Several U.S. federal agencies are working in tandem to address the outbreak:
-The USDA leads from the animal health side by coordinating with the FDA and CDC.
-The FDA ensures safety for milk, dairy products, and feed intended for animals in order to safeguard public health.
-The CDC tracks human infections, tests potential cases, and tracks virus movement.
Despite these efforts, challenges remain. Testing gaps, limited surveillance in some states, and flaws in diagnostic tools mean many cases may go undetected, leaving communities vulnerable.
While human-to-human transmission of H5N1 has not been documented, the possibility remains a primary concern. Historical data paints a grim picture: since the virus's discovery in 1997, over 900 reported human cases have occurred globally, with a mortality rate exceeding 50%. Cambodia recently reported ten cases, including two fatalities, attributed to a more virulent strain.
If H5N1 mutates further to attain sustained human-to-human transmission, it will unleash a pandemic of catastrophic proportions. The US federal government has started the process of vaccine stockpiling, but the present level of supply is alarmingly grossly inadequate.
The United States has less than five million doses of H5N1 vaccines, which would be enough to cover only 2% of the population. Manufacturing contracts also have been signed to produce an additional 10 million syringes by 2025, though this timeline may be too slow in the face of a rapidly evolving virus.
The technology behind these vaccines is also antiquated. Most are produced in a slow and inflexible, century-old egg-based process. No licensed mRNA-based flu vaccine—a technology that proved so valuable during the COVID-19 pandemic—is available to add to this preparedness.
According to an immunologist, Dr. Vasso Apostolopoulos, genetic makeup could influence virulence for H5N1. Mutations in genes critical for such functions as hemagglutinin, helping viruses get inside the cells, and another that helps in enhancing replication, have been discovered recently. This may mean that genetic mutations may further enhance its capacity to induce severe disease.
The similarity between H5N1 and early COVID-19 is unnerving. Like SARS-CoV-2, H5N1 can quietly spread until a tipping point is reached. The world saw how quickly a virus could immobilize societies before vaccines were widespread. Still, current preparedness for a bird flu pandemic is still woefully insufficient.
It took almost a year to bring forward the first COVID-19 vaccines, in which millions lost their lives due to the virus. Experts believe that H5N1 will not present humanity with the flexibility to adapt slowly. The delayed response of the world towards the spread of a future H5N1 pandemic may be devastatingly slow unless advanced vaccine technologies are prepared proactively and investment in it is made.
To reduce the spread of H5N1, robust responses are required:
1. Public health agencies should increase testing for H5N1 in humans and animals, especially in high-risk environments like farms.
2. Accelerating the development and stockpiling of mRNA-based vaccines could provide a faster, more adaptive response.
3. Countries must share data, resources, and expertise to monitor and contain the virus.
4. Protective measures in case of exposure to infected animals for farmworkers are essential, such as wearing personal protective equipment and health checkup on a regular basis. H5N1 bird flu is a stark reminder that the line between preparedness and vulnerability is thin.
The risk at this moment is low, but the mutation and the historical lethality it holds require a proactive attitude. The lessons from COVID-19 highlight the price paid for underestimation of a virus's potency. The next pandemic will not be if, but when. Whether we rise to the challenge or repeat past mistakes will therefore define the impact of H5N1 on global health.
Credits: Canva
Over the past two decades, a lot has changed in psychiatry. The field has embraced many unexpected tools, including electricity. Once largely the realm of pharmaceuticals and talk therapy, the field is undergoing a technological evolution powered by devices that target the brain's circuitry. This is known as electroceuticals. These approaches offer new hope for people with severe, treatment-resistant psychiatric disorders such as depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).
These usually refer to therapies that use electrical stimulation to modulate nervous system activity. These technologies aim to correct misfiring circuits in the brain, much like how a pacemaker regulates the heart. The therapies now being studied or offered include:
While many of these interventions are still being evaluated for efficacy in psychiatric care, they are already in use for neurological conditions like Parkinson's disease. It lend credibility to the crossover.
Historically, psychiatry has operated on the assumption that mental illnesses stem primarily from chemical imbalances. This led to a focus on medications like SRRIs. However, recent research began shifting the focus from brain chemistry to brain circuitry. Neurosurgeons and psychiatrists alike now see disorders like depression not as chemical shortages but as network dysfunctions - where certain brain circuits fall to properly connect or regulate mood and behavior.
The shift is also shown in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) with DBS. Electrodes implanted deep in the brain deliver high-frequency pulses to specific regions believed to be involved in mood regulation. Though still considered experimental for depression by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), DBS is FDA-approved for treatment-resistant OCD and shows promise in clinical trials.
As per reports, an estimated 30% of people with depression and up to 60% with OCD do not respond to traditional treatments. For these individuals, electroceutical may also represent the only available hope. The access, however, is still very limited. The reason is cost and insurance coverage. However, with devices like VNS and TMS, which have now gained FDA clearance and some insurance support, the accessibility has been better. Though DBS and focused ultrasound remain largely available only through clinical trials.
The emotional and physical toll on patients can be considerable. Surgeries carry risks—such as infection, hemorrhage, or hardware complications—and require significant recovery time. Even successful cases often need supplementary treatments like medication or psychotherapy to sustain benefits.
Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS): Involves implanting electrodes in the brain to stimulate key regions. It has shown success in regulating mood in patients with severe depression and OCD. Some report life-changing relief after decades of suffering, although results vary.
Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS): Sends signals via the vagus nerve to influence brain activity. Approved for treatment-resistant depression, its effectiveness is debated, with mixed outcomes in clinical trials.
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS): Uses magnetic pulses delivered through a coil placed on the scalp. It’s non-invasive and increasingly accessible, though it requires multiple sessions and benefits may fade over time.
Focused Ultrasound: The newest contender, it uses sound waves to either ablate or modulate deep brain tissue. Still in early research stages, it’s entirely non-invasive and could become a game-changer due to its precision and safety profile.
Credits: Canva
Have you ever felt so tired that you had your joints aching, shaky hands, recurring headaches, and excessive weariness. Did you feel like you were just having a bad day and your body felt too tired? They are not only symptoms of a bad day. These are small but persistent symptoms of a larger problem: chronic pain. What is chronic pain? Pain that persists for more than three months is no longer considered transient or situational. It causes a condition that lowers not only one's physical health but also one's whole quality of life.
Chronic pain is a widespread issue, impacting nearly 30 percent of people globally. It can arrive slowly or after an injury, and once it settles in, it often refuses to leave. Over time, it can dull not just physical strength, but emotional resilience. The discomfort starts to bleed into other areas — your sleep, energy levels, social life, and mental well-being.
It’s no surprise that ongoing physical pain can be emotionally draining. But recent research points to something deeper: a strong biological link between chronic pain and depression. When pain is felt in multiple areas of the body — known as multisite chronic pain — the risk of developing depression rises sharply. In fact, people with this type of pain are nearly four times more likely to experience depressive symptoms.
What makes this connection particularly important is that it’s not just psychological. New scientific methods have revealed that chronic pain and depression might share genetic roots. Inflammatory markers like C-reactive protein (CRP) — commonly elevated in those with ongoing pain — are also linked to mental health issues. In other words, the pain-depression link may not just be coincidental. It could be caused by underlying biological processes.
Not all types of pain affect mental health equally. Some forms — like facial pain, stomach pain, and chronic headaches — have been found to carry a stronger link to depression. As pain spreads across the body, the emotional toll deepens. It’s not just the pain that becomes unbearable — it’s the sense of being worn down physically and mentally, day after day.
Even simple tasks can become overwhelming. Chronic pain can make everyday actions feel exhausting, while also disrupting sleep and making recovery more difficult. The longer it lasts, the more likely it is to impact work, relationships, and overall identity.
One of the key takeaways from the research is that chronic pain and depression often need to be treated together. Focusing only on physical relief without addressing the emotional damage can leave recovery incomplete. Similarly, treating mental health without easing physical symptoms may not be effective.
The emerging mind-body approach encourages healthcare providers to look at both aspects — helping patients manage pain while also supporting their emotional well-being. Whether through therapy, lifestyle changes, medication, or a mix of all three, the goal is to offer holistic care that treats the whole person.
Credits: Canva
In an breakthrough scientific discovery, scientists have found that a common diabetes medication taken by millions globally—metformin, may provide unexpected protection against acute myeloid leukemia (AML), a fast-growing and frequently fatal type of blood cancer. This has been established by a new study by the University of Cambridge, which has been published in the highly-respected journal Nature. The study suggests metformin to be a low-cost, safe preventative therapy for individuals who are at high risk of developing AML.
This finding may represent a paradigm change in the approach to cancer prevention in medicine—particularly in hematological malignancies where early intervention is usually restrictive.
In contrast to solid cancers like breast or prostate cancer, which at times may be removed surgically, blood cancers are more difficult to localize and destroy. As Cambridge Stem Cell Institute Professor George Vassiliou describes it, "With blood cancers, we must first find people at risk and then apply medical treatments to halt cancer growth across the body." AML, which begins in the bone marrow and develops quickly, is an example of this difficulty.
Approximately 3,100 individuals in the UK are diagnosed with AML every year. It has a poor prognosis and few treatment options, especially in the elderly. Although the latest advances in blood testing are able to indicate individuals at risk years earlier than before, to date, there has not been a sure way to stop AML from forming.
Scientists targeted their research on DNMT3A, a gene commonly mutated in AML patients. This one mutation is thought to trigger as much as 15% of all AML. Metformin seems to break the energy metabolism of these pre-leukemic cells, targeting their aberrant growth pathways. By disabling the cells' capacity to produce energy, metformin stops them from developing into full-blown leukemia.
Additional analysis of health information from more than 412,000 UK Biobank participants reinforced the link. Metformin users had a significantly lower incidence of damaging mutations in the DNMT3A gene, whether or not they had diabetes. The results indicate a protective effect that is independent of the drug's initial purpose.
The origins of metformin trace back to medicinal plants used during medieval Europe. Isolated from Galega officinalis, a plant used in traditional medicine to cure urinary and metabolic problems, its active ingredient—guanidine—was discovered to lower blood sugar in the early 20th century. Although it was disfavored for a period, metformin was re-released and approved in Europe in the 1950s and subsequently by the FDA in 1995. It's now most commonly prescribed diabetes medication globally, especially in patients who have type 2 diabetes and are unable to regulate blood sugar levels by diet and exercise alone.
Decreasing the level of glucose absorbed by the intestines through food.
Suppressing the liver's release of glucose.
Increasing insulin sensitivity, so that the body can utilize glucose more effectively.
These metabolic actions are not only helpful for controlling diabetes, but potentially for stopping or slowing other disease processes—such as cancer.
What's even more amazing is how metformin's benefits go beyond controlling blood sugar. According to Harvard Health and other medical centers, the medication has been linked with:
Off-label prescriptions have also been used for some of these indications in metformin, highlighting the drug's versatile utility and solid safety profile.
One of the main advantages of metformin is its long history of safety. Taken by millions of people over many decades, it tends to have only minor side effects—e.g., nausea, bloating, or altered taste. Serious side effects, such as lactic acidosis, are infrequent and typically only occur in those with existing kidney disease.
As Blood Cancer UK's Director of Research Dr. Rubina Ahmed put it, "Repurposing existing, safe drugs such as metformin allows the possibility that new treatments might get to people earlier, without going through the extensive drug development pathways."
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited