Credits: Canva
The winter season compels us to sit at one place, under the blanket, at the ease of warmth. But aren't we all aware of the dangers of a sedentary lifestyle? And when it is winter, it makes it more so stagnant. Not just that, but now a new study from the University of Iowa says that being a couch potato could lead to 19 chronic conditions. Among the 19 chronic conditions, obesity, diabetes, depression and heart diseases also made it to the list.
Research shows that among many diseases, increased blood pressure, high blood sugar, excess body fat around the waist, unhealthy cholesterol levels that leads to metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease and cancer are also there. This is why any extended sitting whether at desk, behind the wheel or the screen can be harmful.
The team of researchers from various departments at the University of Iowa conducted a detailed study where they analyzed records from over 40,000 patients at a major Midwestern hospital system. In the records, they looked at the extensive physical inactivity of these patients and how it impacted their overall health.
The study and the detailed analysis is published in the journal Preventing Chronic Disease and studies.
As part of conducting the study, a 30-second exercise survey was conducted. Then, patients were also asked two questions: how many days per week they engaged in moderate to vigorous exercise and for how many minutes per session? On the basis of response, the patients were categorized into three groups:
As per Lucas Carr, associate professor in the Department of Health and Human Physiology and study's corresponding author, "This two-question survey typically takes fewer than 30 seconds for a patient to complete so it does not interfere with their visit. But it can tell us a whole lot about that patient's overall health."
The study got 7,261 responses, and it found that around 60% of them met the recommended guidelines for exercising. These people met the 150 minutes or more minutes of moderate exercise per week. However, almost 36% exercised less than 150 minutes per week and 4% reported no physical activity.
The study also found that people experienced lower rates of depression. 15% of people who exercise for 150 minutes or more, or at least for some amount of time could experience depression, as compared to 26% of those who are inactive. Similarly, for obesity, the numbers are 12% versus 21% for obesity, 20% versus 35% for hypertension and the similar trend was seen in other diseases, and markers of good health, including lower resting pulse rates, and cholesterol profiles.
Patients with no physical activity carried a median of 2.16 chronic conditions, this number was 1.49 conditions in insufficiently active patients and dropped to 1.17 in active patients.
Credit: iStock
Parkinson’s disease (PD) symptoms differ between women and men, a new study has found, with potential implications for treatment.
Presented at the 2026 International Congress of Parkinson’s Disease and Movement Disorders in Seoul, the study found that women experienced more severe motor complications and depression. Men, however, had greater cognitive impairment.
“Sex differences in movement disorders remain understudied and undervalued despite having an important impact on clinical outcomes in both real-life and clinical trial settings,” said Dr. Marina Picillo, assistant professor of neurology at AOU San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d’Aragona.
Researchers retrospectively analyzed 10 years of clinical data from more than 10,000 Parkinson’s patients examined at a movement disorders clinic in Germany.
The findings showed that women had a greater burden of motor complications and depression. Men were more likely to experience cognitive impairment, REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) and loss of smell.
“By analyzing data for more than 10,000 PD patients, this study confirmed that depression is more common in women, while RBD, worse cognition, and poorer olfaction are more prevalent in men,” Picillo said. “With good representation of women (40%), it also confirmed a greater female burden of motor complications.”
The findings highlight the need to account for sex differences in Parkinson’s disease management and clinical trial design, particularly given the historical underrepresentation of women in neurological research. However, the factors underlying these differences remain unclear.
Picillo stressed that considering sex differences when tailoring treatment and designing clinical trials could be an important first step toward precision medicine in Parkinson’s disease.
“This would be the very first, basic step for boosting precision medicine in PD,” she said.
Parkinson’s disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder caused by the loss of dopamine-producing nerve cells in the brain.
Common symptoms include tremors, muscle stiffness, slowed movement and impaired balance. As the disease progresses, patients may have difficulty walking, speaking and performing everyday tasks.
The condition can also cause cognitive impairment, depression, anxiety, sleep disturbances, pain and swallowing difficulties, affecting patients’ independence and quality of life. Although it primarily affects older adults, younger people can also develop Parkinson’s disease.
Parkinson’s disease affected an estimated 11.9 million people worldwide in 2021. The number is projected to reach 25.2 million by 2050, a 112% increase.
There is currently no established way to prevent Parkinson’s disease. However, research suggests that certain lifestyle and environmental factors may influence disease risk.
Credit: AI
Auto antibodies that target the body’s DNA-repair process may provide researchers with some clues about why some children develop cancer. It has opened new avenues for early detection and appropriate treatment, according to a study published in Frontiers in Immunology recently.
A team of researchers from Norway, through the study, identified that children with cancer were more likely to have antibodies that target proteins tasked with repairing damaged DNA.
In a separate group of children whose blood samples had been collected years before they developed cancer, those who were later diagnosed were about eight times more likely to carry these antibodies than their peers who remained free of cancer.
The findings suggest that these antibodies could be an important marker of early indicator of cancer risk. However, the researchers state that further studies are needed to prove whether the antibodies contribute to cancer development and whether they can reliably predict the disease years before.
Also read: Pope Leo XIV’s Lung Cancer Diagnosis: When Should You Worry About Lung Nodules?
Antibodies are proteins that are generated by the immune system. They help recognise and neutralise foreign bodies, like viruses and bacteria.
Sometimes, however, the immune system produces autoantibodies, which mistakenly target the body’s own proteins.
The study found that some children with cancer had elevated levels of autoantibodies against six proteins involved in DNA repair. They are RAD52, NUMA1, ALKBH7, APBB1, UNG and MGMT.
DNA repair is essential because cells constantly go through damage that can lead to errors into their genetic material. When these errors are not corrected, mutations may accumulate and gradually contribute to cancer.
The researchers proposed an unproven theory that the antibodies might enter cells and bind to protein responsible for DNA repair, interfering with their normal function.
Their laboratory experiments provided evidence that these antibodies can enter living cells and localise to a cellular compartment called the TIGER domain.
“We showed that many children with various types of cancer have antibodies against some of their own DNA repair proteins. We also demonstrated that such ‘auto-antibodies’ can enter live cells and bind to – and probably inhibit – the activity of these essential proteins,” said corresponding author Dr Ola Myklebost, emeritus professor of molecular oncology at the University of Bergen.
If the antibodies do impair DNA repair, they could contribute to the accumulation of genetic damage. However, this mechanism has not yet been conclusively observed in humans.
To investigate whether the antibodies appeared before cancer diagnosis, the researchers examined blood samples from 59 children who participated in two British long-term studies: the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children and Born in Bradford.
Half of the children were subsequently diagnosed with cancer before the age of 30, while the other half had not developed the disease. On average, the blood samples from those who later developed cancer had been collected approximately six years before diagnosis.
“Although this cohort is small, it was the best we could find internationally,” Myklebost said.
He added that children who later developed cancer were about eight times more likely to have antibodies against at least one key DNA-repair protein.
The researchers analysed samples from a broader group of 375 healthy individuals and patients, alongside cancer samples from adults and children with sarcoma or acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.
Childhood cancers are often biologically different from adult cancers. Unlike many adult malignancies, which can accumulate mutations over decades, paediatric cancers may arise in developing cells with fewer accumulated genetic changes. The researchers believe the immune system could play an important role in some cases.
However, the findings do not establish that the antibodies cause cancer. The study also cannot determine how accurately an antibody test would predict future disease in the general population.
The researchers are now investigating whether these antibodies affect DNA repair in laboratory-grown cells and plan to study their potential cancer-causing effects in animal models.
“At present we are investigating the effect of patient antibodies on the repair of induced mutations in cultured cells. Ultimately, we hope to clone white blood cells that secrete such auto-antibodies, and test for any cancer causing effects in mice to definitively prove our hypothesis,” Myklebost said.
Credit: iStock
Atorvastatin, a widely prescribed statin, helps lower cholesterol and reduce the risk of heart attacks and strokes. However, stopping the medication without medical advice can allow cholesterol levels to rise
again. Higher cholesterol levels have been linked to increased risk of heart attacks and other cardiovascular conditions.
Pharmacist Raj Patel recently warned about this in a TikTok video, comparing stopping the drug to giving up regular exercise.
“What happens if you stop taking atorvastatin? You know when you stop exercising for a month and everything slips back?” Patel asked.
“That's what happens when you stop atorvastatin. Your cholesterol creeps back up and so does your heart attack risk,” he warned.
According to the UK's National Health Service (NHS), cholesterol levels may rise again after stopping atorvastatin. Patients should continue taking it unless their doctor advises otherwise.
Also read: Confused By Your Cholesterol Report? Here's What LDL And ApoB Really Mean
Atorvastatin belongs to a class of medicines called statins. It reduces cholesterol production in the liver and helps prevent heart attacks and strokes. Doctors may prescribe it to people with high cholesterol or an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, including those with diabetes or a family history of heart disease.
High cholesterol can cause fatty deposits to build up inside blood vessels, restricting blood flow. Statins help lower cardiovascular risk, particularly in people with existing heart disease or other risk factors.
The NHS previously warned that certain medicines can interact with atorvastatin and increase the risk of serious side effects, including muscle damage. Patients should tell their doctor or pharmacist about all medicines and supplements they take.
On its website, the NHS lists certain “cautions with other medicines.” This means you should check that atorvastatin is safe to take alongside any other drugs or supplements.
Read More: You Feel Healthy. But Plaque May Already Be Building In Your Arteries In Your 20s
The NHS explained: “Some medicines can affect the way atorvastatin works and can increase the chances of you having serious side effects, such as muscle damage.” You should tell your doctor or pharmacist if you are taking any of the following:
Depending on the interaction, a doctor may adjust the dose, prescribe another statin or temporarily pause treatment. Check with a healthcare professional before taking supplements.
According to the NHS, common side effects affecting more than one in 100 people include:
“Drinking large amounts of alcohol regularly increases the risk of side effects and liver problems while taking atorvastatin,” the NHS added. “If side effects make you want to stop taking the medicine, speak to your doctor first. They may be due to another cause, and your doctor can suggest lowering the dose or switching medicines.”
© $2026 Times Horizon Private Limited