Image Credit: Freepik
Timothy had always been health-conscious. After years of social drinking, she decided to quit alcohol for good. But giving up the ritual of sipping on a drink at social gatherings felt impossible. That's when alcohol-free beer and wine seemed like the perfect alternative—offering the taste and experience without the intoxication. However, what Sarah didn't realize was that these supposedly "harmless" drinks might still be affecting her liver in ways she hadn't anticipated.
With a global shift toward healthier choices, the rise of alcohol-free beverages has been fuelled. Do these drinks, however, live up to their promise of being risk-free? New research shows that while they may eliminate the dangers of intoxication, they still pose metabolic and liver-related risks, which calls for moderation in the long run.
The first time you take a sip of an alcohol-free beverage, your body responds almost instantly. Anshul Singh, Lead Clinical Nutritionist and Dietetics Department says, "In as little as 10 minutes, your taste buds have picked up on the flavors, and your brain might even get a placebo effect, giving you the sensation that you're about to be drunk. Some alcohol-free drinks have up to 0.5% ABV, which goes into the bloodstream in minute quantities but will probably not affect you in any significant way."
By the 30-minute mark, your body has metabolized the sugars, artificial sweeteners, or additives in the drink. "Some people may experience a mild insulin spike, which can cause temporary energy boosts. Some non-alcoholic drinks also contain fermentation byproducts or botanical extracts that mimic the sedative effects of alcohol, causing slight drowsiness or relaxation," adds Anshul.
After 60 minutes, most of the drink has been metabolized. Although there is no risk of intoxication, repeated consumption can subtly affect metabolism, gut health, and even trigger cravings for alcohol among those in recovery. Those sensitive to sugar, caffeine, or preservatives might experience even more pronounced effects over time.
Your liver and gut health are connected, forming what is called the gut-liver axis. Anshul emphasises, "Even though drinks without alcohol seem harmless, they usually contain sugars, artificial sweeteners, and fermentation byproducts that can disturb this delicate balance."
Long-term consumption of these drinks may gradually affect digestion, liver detoxification, and overall metabolic health, making moderation necessary.
Even though these nonalcoholic beverages contain virtually insignificant alcohol, the liver processes them as well. "These small concentrations of alcohol-which may go as high as 0.5% ABV-trigger the liver's detoxification pathways but only at much weaker intensities compared to ordinary alcoholic drinks. But the added sugars, artificial sweeteners, and preservatives in the products could pose significant pressure on liver functions over the long term," explains Anshul.
High sugar intake causes insulin resistance, which can lead to the buildup of fat in the liver and increase the risk of developing NAFLD. Some fermentation byproducts in these beverages also trigger oxidative stress, which puts extra pressure on the liver. Though occasional consumption will not pose a significant threat, regular consumption might lead to chronic liver stress and metabolic imbalance.
Although trace amounts of alcohol exist in alcohol-free beer and wine, the body will still have to metabolize them. The body employs the same enzymatic pathways used for alcoholic beverages but at a much lower intensity. However, the added sugars, preservatives, and fermentation byproducts present their own set of challenges:
Alcohol-free drinks do not cause the liver to become overwhelmed as traditional alcohol does, although it does have a lower, but still important, risk for someone who is drinking too much. For someone with a problem of liver disease or metabolic syndrome, limiting alcohol-free drinks is also important.
Alcoholic beverages have always been a dangerous drink, but the safer option for those who want to avoid intoxication. However, it is not totally risk-free. Its impact on metabolism, gut health, and liver function cannot be ignored. Although they are not harmful at first, their consumption over a long period leads to insulin resistance, liver stress, and imbalance in the gut.
For the consumers who love these drinks, moderation is the way forward. The expert shares, "The choice of brands with the least additives, lower sugar, and natural ingredients will reduce risks. In addition, supplementing with a diet that is rich in antioxidants, fiber, and hydration can complement the liver in general."
For most, thought that adopting alcohol-free beverages was a healthier decision. On discovering their side effects on liver health, though, she learned to limit its intake and settle for alternatives that included infused sparkling water, herbal teas, or even kombucha with controlled sugar levels.
The bottom line? Alcohol-free doesn't mean consequence-free. The best way to achieve long-term health is by paying attention to what goes into the body and yet still enjoy social rituals of preference.
Anshul Singh is the Team Lead with the Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics Department at Artemis Hospitals in India.
Credit: AI
A cancer diagnosis in your 20s or 30s could be a life-altering event as it brings several difficult questions that you may not be prepared to answer.
Depending on the cancer type and treatment, the possibility of you having children in the future could get significantly affected. Chemotherapy, radiation and certain surgeries can have a profound impact on reproductive health in both men and women. However, infertility is not an inevitable outcome of cancer treatment.
On National Cancer Awareness Day, experts help us understand the impact of cancer treatment on fertility by discussing options that can help young patients make informed decisions.
Dr Jeyhan B. Dhabhar, Medical Oncologist at Head Neck Cancer Institute India (HNCII), told HealthandMe that the effect of cancer treatment on fertility depends on several factors, including the type of chemotherapy, the area exposed to radiation, the patient's age and the treatment regimen.
“Cancer treatment can affect fertility in both men and women, but it is important to understand that not every cancer treatment causes infertility,” he said.
Dr Vijayalaxmi Koppad, Fertility Consultant at Birthright Fertility, HRBR, Marathahalli, Bengaluru, told HealthandMe that treatments designed to target rapidly dividing cancer cells can also damage reproductive cells. She said, "Chemotherapy may affect ovarian egg reserves or sperm production, while radiation and surgery can also affect reproductive organs."
Also read: FDA Probes Cancer Risk After Tumours Reported In Children Given Novartis's SMA Gene Therapy
The impact of cancer treatment can differ between men and women. In men, certain chemotherapy drugs may reduce sperm count or disrupt sperm production. Although sperm production can recover after treatment, the extent and timing of recovery vary.
In women, treatment may damage the remaining egg supply or affect ovarian function and menstrual cycles. Dr Dhabhar said, "In women, some treatments may affect the number of healthy eggs remaining in the ovaries or cause changes in menstrual cycles. Age is an important factor, as women naturally have a declining egg reserve as they grow older."
Dr Koppad explains that the biological differences between men and women influence their chances of recovery. “Men continuously produce new sperm throughout life, so their reproductive system might recover over time, whereas women are born with a fixed supply of eggs that cannot be replaced once damaged by treatment, making age a critical factor for women,” she said.
However, fertility outcomes cannot be predicted by age or gender alone. As Dr Dhabhar points out, two patients of the same age may have very different outcomes depending on the treatment they receive.
Also read: NCCN Issues First-Ever Guidelines For Cancer Caregivers
Dr Dhabhar said that some cancer treatments can cause permanent infertility but this does not happen to everyone. The risk may be higher with certain chemotherapy drugs, particularly alkylating agents, high-dose chemotherapy and radiation directed at reproductive organs.
Surgeries that involve removing the ovaries or testes can also result in permanent loss of fertility. However, advances in fertility preservation have given young patients options to consider before starting cancer treatment.
Dr Koppad said, “High-dose chemotherapy, pelvic radiation, or surgeries that remove reproductive organs (like the ovaries or testes) can lead to permanent loss of fertility. However, modern fertility preservation techniques—such as freezing eggs, embryos, or sperm before treatment begins—give young patients a crucial safety net for the future.”
Men may be able to freeze sperm, while women can consider egg or embryo freezing. These procedures can preserve fertility post after treatment.
Dr Dhabhar said, "My advice to young patients is simple: if having children in the future is important to you, speak to your oncologist before starting treatment. Even a short discussion can make a meaningful difference to your future choices."
Fertility can return naturally after cancer treatment and some survivors go on to have children without fertility assistance. In men, sperm production may gradually recover after chemotherapy. In women, menstrual cycles and ovarian function may return, depending on their age and the treatment.
However, the return of regular periods does not always mean that ovarian function or fertility has fully recovered. Similarly, sperm production may take time to return, and recovery is not guaranteed.
“Many cancer survivors go on to have healthy children,” says Dr Dhabhar. He recommends that patients planning a family after treatment undergo a fertility assessment and discuss the appropriate time to try for pregnancy with their oncologist.
Ideally fertility should be discussed between oncologists and young patients before treatment begins. This gives patients an opportunity to understand the risks and consider preservation options.
Dr Koppad says, “While global medical guidelines urge doctors to discuss fertility before starting any therapy, it still gets overlooked during the initial rush to fight the disease.”
She encourages patients and their families to raise the subject early. One question they can ask their oncologist is: “How will this treatment affect my future family plans?”
Dr Dhabhar also emphasises that fertility planning should be addressed alongside cancer care, rather than becoming a reason to avoid or postpone essential treatment.
His message to young patients is clear. He said, “A cancer diagnosis does not mean giving up the dream of having a family. With the right guidance and timely planning, many patients can successfully balance cancer treatment with their future fertility goals.”
Credit: AI
Breast cancer is a diagnosis that understandably brings fear and uncertainty. However, when detected at an early stage- particularly Stage 1- the outlook is often very positive. In fact, many patients with Stage 1 breast cancer go on to live long, healthy lives after treatment. Understanding why this stage is considered highly curable can help reduce anxiety and encourage timely action.
Stage 1 breast cancer means the tumor is still small and confined to the breast, typically measuring up to 2 centimeters, with little to no spread to nearby lymph nodes. At this stage, the disease is localized, which makes it significantly easier to treat compared to more advanced stages where cancer may have spread to other parts of the body.
One of the main reasons Stage 1 breast cancer is often curable is early detection. With increased awareness and the use of screening tools such as mammography, many cases are identified before symptoms even appear. Detecting cancer early allows doctors to intervene before it grows or spreads, improving the chances of complete removal and recovery.
Treatment for Stage 1 breast cancer is usually very effective and may involve a combination of surgery, radiation therapy, and sometimes medication such as hormone therapy or targeted therapy. In many cases, patients can undergo breast-conserving surgery (lumpectomy), where only the tumor and a small margin of surrounding tissue are removed, preserving most of the breast. This is often followed by radiation therapy to eliminate any remaining cancer cells.
Another important factor is the biology of the tumor. Early-stage cancers are often less aggressive and have not yet developed the ability to spread extensively. Doctors also assess hormone receptor status and other markers to tailor treatment specifically to the patient, improving outcomes further.
Survival rates for Stage 1 breast cancer are very high. With timely and appropriate treatment, the five-year survival rate is close to 100%. This highlights how powerful early diagnosis and modern treatment approaches can be.
However, it is important to remember that “curable” does not mean “to be taken lightly.” Regular follow-ups, adherence to treatment, and lifestyle modifications play a key role in ensuring long-term health. Patients are encouraged to maintain a balanced diet, stay physically active, and attend all scheduled medical check-ups.
In conclusion, Stage 1 breast cancer offers a window of opportunity where the disease can be treated effectively and often completely cured. The key lies in awareness, regular screening, and seeking medical advice at the earliest sign of any change. Early action not only saves lives but also allows patients to return to their normal lives with confidence and hope.
By Dr. Pragati Singhal, Consultant Surgical Oncology, Breast Oncoplasty, Narayana RN Tagore Hospital, Mukundapur
Credit: AI
Delhi was ranked the world's most polluted major city on Saturday morning, November 7, 2026, by Swiss air-quality technology company, IQAir. The national capital has been grappling with worsening pollution ahead of Diwali.
IQAir placed Delhi at the top of its live global ranking at 10:35 am, with an air quality index (AQI) reading of 581. The AQI was more than twice that of Lahore in Pakistan, which recorded an AQI of 285 at the time.
However, India's Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) reported different readings as it uses different scales than IQAir to calculate AQI. According to CPCB, Delhi's AQI was 363 at 10 am on Saturday, placing the city under 'very poor' category. According to reports, Friday's air quality was the worst recorded before Diwali in eight years.
Also read: High AQI and High Blood Pressure: Is There a Connection People Often Overlook?
Several north Indian states including Delhi choke due to severe air pollution ahead of and during winter due to several reasons. Cold, dense air and slow winds can trap pollutants close to the ground, fueling rising AQI. Vehicular emissions, stubble burning, construction dust, and firecracker smoke from Diwali celebrations only compound to the hazardous environmental crisis.
The Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) introduced restrictions as pollution levels have increased drastically. Schools in and around Delhi have been directed to switch to online classes, while residents have been encouraged to work from home. Authorities have also asked local governments to consider allowing half of public- and private-sector employees to work remotely.
Delhi Environment Minister Manjinder Singh Sirsa warned that weather conditions could worsen further. “From tomorrow, the weather is going to become worse, winds will completely stop, which will worsen the AQI,” he said, according to Reuters.
Also read: Delhi Air Pollution: Should You Move Your Morning Walk And Jog Indoors As AQI Nears 400?
PM2.5, fine particulate matter, is a major health concern because its tiny particles can travel deep into the lungs and enter the bloodstream.
Exposure to these pollutants can aggravate asthma and other respiratory conditions like COPD and bronchitis, irritate the eyes and airways, and increase the risk of cardiovascular and respiratory disease.
In an X post, Dr. Sudhir Kr. Gupta (MD, Resp. MED), Senior Consultant Chest Physician & Bronchoscopist at Kailash Healthcare said, “Those who struggle with such respiratory problems should strictly avoid going out, especially when pollution levels are severe.”
The effects are not limited to people with existing health conditions. Children, older adults, pregnant women and people with heart or lung diseases may be particularly vulnerable.
As pollution levels remain high, health experts advise limiting strenuous outdoor activity, especially during periods of severe air quality. People who need to go outside can use a well-fitting N95 or N99 respirator.
Dr Viny Kantroo, Senior Consultant, Respiratory Medicine, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi, told HealthandMe, “A well-fitted N95 mask filters at least 95% of airborne particles under standard testing conditions and can reduce exposure to PM2.5. Its protection depends on how closely it fits the face. There is no fixed number of hours for which it can be worn. Follow the manufacturer's instructions and replace it if it becomes wet, dirty, damaged or difficult to breathe through. A disposable N95 should not be washed.”
Many opt for cloth masks while stepping. The doctor explained if cloth masks are as effective as N95 or N99 masks to protect yourself from toxic air.
She added, “Cloth masks offer limited and inconsistent protection against PM2.5. Their effectiveness depends on the fabric, number of layers and fit, but they generally do not filter fine particles as reliably as an N95. A well-fitted N95 or equivalent respirator is a better choice when stepping outdoors during severe pollution. Even then, reducing time outdoors remains important.”
Dr. Jeenam Shah, Consultant Pulmonology, Wockhard Hospital, Mumbai Central told HealthandMe that scarves, handkerchiefs and loose-fitting surgical masks are also not adequate substitutes for a properly fitted N95 or equivalent respirator. He said, "During severe pollution, an N95 mask is a better option when outdoor exposure is unavoidable."
She also recommended not wearing masks for long hours and disposing them off when they get soiled.
She said, “An N95 can be worn for several hours if it remains dry, clean, undamaged and fits properly. Replace it if breathing becomes difficult or the mask becomes wet or dirty. Disposable N95 masks should not be washed. If wearing one for long periods, take breaks in a cleaner indoor environment when possible. The mask should fit closely around the nose and mouth, as gaps reduce its effectiveness.”
Indoor exposure can also be reduced by keeping windows closed when outdoor pollution is high, using an appropriately sized HEPA air purifier where available and avoiding indoor sources of smoke.
Dr Kantroo said, “Polluted air can enter through gaps in doors and windows, while cooking fumes, incense, smoking and cleaning products can add to indoor pollution. A HEPA air purifier can reduce fine particles, provided it is suitable for the room size and its filters are maintained. During severe pollution, keep windows closed. Ventilate when outdoor air quality improves, rather than relying on a fixed time of day.”
Dr Gupta also recommended using masks and keeping an air purifier at home to maintain indoor air quality.
Dr Kantroo also spoke about morning walks and outdoor exercise when AQI is severe. She explained, “When AQI is Very Poor or Severe, strenuous outdoor exercise should be avoided."
Dr Shah explained that physical activity increases your breathing rate, which means you inhale more pollutants and expose your lungs to higher levels of harmful particles. He advised, "Instead, opt for indoor exercises in a well-ventilated, air-purified environment. If outdoor activity is unavoidable, keep it brief and avoid high-traffic areas."
© $2026 Times Horizon Private Limited