MRI scans are strong diagnostics with high-definition images of what lies inside a body. Strong magnetic fields require precaution, as brought out by an instance where a young woman suffered very serious injuries due to an oversight in a metallic core within a silicone sex toy that she happened to have before the MRI scan. This makes a stark reminder about the potentially deadly consequences of missing metal objects when such procedures are being performed. In April 2023, a 23-year-old woman went into an MRI with a silicone plug containing a metal core that was not known.

She thought that the item is made entirely out of silicone according to the advertising. However, the strong magnetic field of the MRI machine interacted with the hidden metal, dragging the object through her body and causing excruciating pain. According to reports from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the scene was harrowing, with the woman screaming in agony and requiring immediate hospitalization. Despite pre-scan screenings, which are routine prior to a scan, the patient did not inform the facility that the object existed because he presumed it was purely non-metallic. This caused serious injuries that led to the patient's law suit against the manufacturer for deceitful misrepresentations of material content.

MRI machines employ magnets between 0.5 to 3 Tesla (T). This is thousands of times stronger than the Earth's magnetic field. The tremendous force causes ferromagnetic materials, like iron and nickel, to be magnetized quickly and become strongly attracted toward the magnet. Objects as small as hairpins or paper clips will accelerate at 40 miles per hour inside the magnetic field.

The force can lead to catastrophic injuries in items lodged within the body, such as metallic implants or foreign objects. Metallic cores within devices, like pacemakers or intrauterine devices, must be disclosed to radiologists to prevent such complications.

How Metal Objects Interact with MRI Fields?

On these claims, Dr. Adam Taylor, a specialist in human anatomy, weighed his words in a international health website and added that the distance away and mass of this object would increase its velocity towards that of sound, "The acceleration would be phenomenal, but with a metallic core, it can't go anywhere near supersonic speeds. As for the size, the magnetic acceleration to the internal soft tissues would ensure that there could be severe intracranial trauma."

The injuries inflicted in this case likely involved damage to major blood vessels, nerves, or organs, highlighting the devastating impact of even minor oversight during an MRI scan.

This is not an isolated case. There are documented cases of metallic objects causing serious damage during MRI scans with a 65-year-old man with schizophrenia swallowed metal objects, including sockets and a hinge pin. The powerful magnetic field during an MRI scan caused the objects to rupture his stomach, resulting in serious injuries.

A toddler who ingested 11 small magnets perforated his bowel while undergoing a scan, making his case unique. In another deadly but extremely rare incident, there have been people who hide a firearm on themselves during MRI procedures. Magnetic attraction can trigger a discharge in a weapon and has led to some fatal injuries.

These cases emphasize the very strong need for adequate screening and patient education prior to an MRI.

Preventing MRI-Related Incidents

Medical professionals have been trained to avoid risks. This is by properly screening a patient for metallic objects. In general, most pre-scan protocols include:

• Patients are interrogated about implants, recent surgery or exposures at work related to metals.
• Radiologists sometimes use handheld metal detectors to search for hidden items.
• People who work with metal, like welders or machinists, will need additional testing to detect microscopic metal fragments within soft tissues or eyes.

The case emphasizes the importance of product labeling by manufacturers, especially those products that are likely to unintentionally cause harm to health. The patient's assumption that her device was 100% silicone points to a larger problem in consumer markets with misinformation.

It also reminds the patients to report any possible dangers to the medical professionals, no matter how the objects look non-metallic. In sensitive cases, patients can request private discussions with healthcare providers to ensure safety without discomfort.

In the end, it is a joint effort from manufacturers, healthcare professionals, and patients that can prevent such tragedies. Manufacturers must ensure truthful marketing, while healthcare providers should educate patients about the dangers of metal objects in MRI settings. For patients, understanding the risks and actively participating in pre-scan disclosures can be lifesaving.

This young woman's experience is a sobering example of the unforeseen dangers posed by MRI machines when precautions are overlooked. It serves as a wake-up call to address gaps in patient awareness, medical protocols, and product transparency. By learning from this incident, the medical community and the public can work together to ensure MRI scans remain a safe and effective diagnostic tool.

The suspected pneumonic plague case in Russia has revived memories of the Black Death and the 1979 Sverdlovsk anthrax outbreak.

While Russia has denied any plague outbreak, the death of a young laboratory worker and reports of nearly 200 people being placed under medical observation have raised questions about laboratory safety and what may have happened.

Moscow told the World Health Organization (WHO) that no plague cases have been detected in Irkutsk and that the deceased woman’s contacts tested negative for dangerous pathogens. COVID-19 and rhinovirus were detected in some people under observation.

Russia Says No Plague Cases Detected

Russian authorities told the WHO that there was “no case of this dangerous disease” in Irkutsk, WHO spokesperson Christian Lindmeier said at a Geneva briefing.

Russia also said contacts of the deceased tested negative for dangerous infectious pathogens.

The circumstances of the death have nevertheless raised questions about laboratory safety and possible pathogen exposure.

Also read: Russia Plague Scare: Could It Trigger A New Pandemic? Experts Explain

From Black Death to Pneumonic Plague

The Black Death swept across Eurasia and North Africa between 1346 and 1353, killing an estimated 30% to 60% of Europe’s population.

It was caused by Yersinia pestis, the same bacterium responsible for plague today. The pandemic was primarily associated with bubonic plague, although pneumonic plague also occurred.

Bubonic plague is mainly spread through infected flea bites, while pneumonic plague affects the lungs and can spread between people through respiratory droplets during close contact. Modern antibiotics can treat plague, particularly when given early.

The 1979 Sverdlovsk Anthrax Outbreak

The circumstances surrounding the Russian lab worker’s death have also revived memories of the anthrax outbreak in Sverdlovsk, then part of the Soviet Union, in April and May 1979.

Soviet authorities initially blamed contaminated meat, while US officials attributed the outbreak to anthrax spores accidentally released from a military microbiology facility.

The distribution of human and animal cases along a path extending from the facility was consistent with an airborne release.

The incident remains an important example of the consequences of an accidental biological-agent release.

Why Has the Russia Case Raised Questions?

Read More: Russia Plague Scare: Is Pneumonic Plague Deadlier Than Bubonic & Septicemic Plague?

The cause of the laboratory worker’s death and the circumstances of any possible exposure remain unclear.

The reported quarantine of nearly 200 people has also raised questions about the scale of the response.

Dr. Ashish Jha, former dean of Brown University’s School of Public Health, said the case had raised several “red flags.”

He questioned whether a laboratory worker handling plague would have been vaccinated or received antibiotics promptly after a suspected exposure, and why so many people were placed under quarantine.

Jha also pointed to Russia’s history of biological weapons research and expressed concern about the lack of information from Russian authorities.

There is currently no evidence, however, that the death was linked to a biological weapons programme or that a laboratory leak occurred.

How Safe Are Plague Laboratories?

Javier Pizarro-Cerda, head of the Yersinia Research Unit at the Institut Pasteur in Paris, told CNBC that he was “very surprised” by the reported death because laboratories handling plague generally use strict protective measures.

“You work with a full body suit. You work with masks. You work with gloves. So even if you break a tube, normally you should be protected,” he said.

Pizarro-Cerda also said Russia has a plague vaccine, although he described its protection as low and transient compared with standards elsewhere.

What Could Confirm Plague?

Pizarro-Cerda said plague testing can be performed rapidly and that an autopsy should provide evidence if the woman had pulmonary plague.

The laboratory worker reportedly died on October 2, giving authorities several days to conduct diagnostic tests.

Still, there is no confirmation that pneumonic plague caused her death or that a laboratory accident occurred.

Key questions remain whether Yersinia pestis was detected, whether there was evidence of laboratory exposure, and whether genetic testing can establish the source of any infection.

A deadly fungal infection that can cause brain abscesses has shown a sharp increase in detections in the US, according to a new report from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

The CDC’s latest Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report flagged a substantial rise in detections of Cladophialophora bantiana, a neurotropic fungus associated with a 60%–70% case-fatality rate, even with aggressive treatment. The fungus can also infect people without known immune problems.

How Were the Cases Detected?

A clinical reference laboratory at the University of Washington identified 48 confirmed cases and one probable case of C. bantiana infection from January 2009 through July 2026.

Annual case counts ranged from one to five between 2009 and 2023 before rising to eight in 2024 and 14 in 2025.

Among the 49 cases, 43 (88%) were detected in intracranial central nervous system (CNS) tissue specimens, while six (12%) were found in lung specimens. The presence of the fungus in lung specimens supports a presumed respiratory route of infection.

The detection rate also increased sharply. Between 2017 and 2023, an average of 8.4 cases were detected per 1,000 CNS specimens submitted for fungal PCR testing at the University of Washington. By 2025, this had increased by 210% to 26 cases per 1,000 specimens.

The cases were reported from 21 US states and the District of Columbia, with the highest numbers coming from California, Florida, Texas and Pennsylvania.

Also read: Candida auris: US CDC Reports 3,437 Cases of Deadly Superbug In 27 States

Why Is the Fungus Increasing?

The CDC said the reason for the apparent increase is unknown. The agency called for further research into possible epidemiologic risk factors and whether changes in the fungus, including potentially increased virulence, could be contributing to the rise.

The CDC also noted that there is no routine surveillance system for C. bantiana. Available information largely comes from case reports and retrospective studies, making it difficult to assess how widespread the infection is or whether its epidemiology is changing.

The report recommended that clinicians consider C. bantiana in patients with brain abscesses. Prompt antifungal treatment is required, while surgical removal of the abscess may improve outcomes.

What Is Cladophialophora bantiana?

Read More: Russia Plague Scare: Could It Trigger A New Pandemic? Experts Explain

C. bantiana is a highly virulent, neurotropic dematiaceous mold that predominantly causes brain abscesses.

It is a rare and life-threatening collection of pus enclosed in the brain tissue that creates dangerous pressure inside the skull.

It can infect both immunocompromised people and those without known immune problems. About half of reported patients have no preceding immunocompromising condition.

The presumed route of infection is inhalation or direct inoculation following a skin injury. The fungus can then enter the bloodstream and spread to the brain.

Rare pulmonary and skin infections have also been reported, but most cases involve the brain, often without evidence of infection elsewhere in the body or a clear source of exposure.

The fungus has only rarely been isolated from environmental sources, and researchers have not identified consistent exposure histories or risk factors among patients.

What Are the Symptoms?

Symptoms primarily reflect brain involvement, including fungal brain abscesses and increased pressure inside the skull.

Common symptoms include:

• Headache, often progressive or persistent
• Hemiparesis, or weakness on one side of the body
• Seizures
• Confusion, lethargy or altered consciousness
• Nausea and vomiting
• Fever
• Speech problems, including difficulty speaking
• Visual disturbances and other neurological deficits

Because C. bantiana commonly affects the brain, symptoms can vary depending on the location of the abscess and the extent of inflammation or pressure inside the skull.

How Is the Infection Treated?

Treatment requires prompt antifungal therapy, although there is no established optimal regimen for C. bantiana infection.

The CDC noted that surgical excision or drainage of brain abscesses may improve outcomes. A 2024 study involving 23 patients in France found more favorable outcomes among patients who underwent surgical treatment.

When possible, surgical removal of the abscess may therefore be considered alongside combination antifungal therapy.

The most effective antifungal combination remains uncertain. Treatment approaches have included liposomal amphotericin B, posaconazole or voriconazole, and flucytosine.

A suspected case of pneumonic plague in Siberia has triggered quarantine measures after a laboratory worker at Russia’s Irkutsk Anti-Plague Research Institute died following severe pneumonia.

Russian health authorities have not yet confirmed that the 28-year-old died due to plague. Rospotrebnadzor has described the illness as pneumonia of unknown origin and said tests have found no evidence linking her death to pathogens at the institute.

Reportedly, around 200 people who may have had contact with her have been placed under medical observation.

As of October 5, Russian health authorities said about 60% of contacts had completed observation successfully and no one reported symptoms of plague infection.

The incident has attracted international attention as unconfirmed reports claimed that the woman may have developed pneumonic plague after she accidentally broke a test tube at the research facility. Russian authorities have denied that there was a laboratory accident. The hospital where she died has also been placed under quarantine.

Pneumonic vs Bubonic vs Septicemic Plague: Which Is Deadlier?

Also read: Russia Plague Outbreak: Lab Worker Dies Of 'Unknown Infection' After Suspected Exposure; CDC Monitors The Situation

Bubonic plague is the most common form. It accounts for most number of naturally occurring human plague infections.

It usually develops after an infected flea bite. The bacteria this case travels to nearby lymph nodes and causing the characteristic painful swelling known as a bubo. If diagnosed early, it can be successfully treated with antibiotics.

Septicemic plague occurs when the bacteria enter the bloodstream. It can develop as a complication of bubonic plague, but it can also occur as a primary infection.

Because the bacteria are circulating throughout the body, patients can rapidly develop shock, bleeding and tissue death.

Pneumonic plague is the most dangerous from a transmission standpoint. It infects the lungs and can develop after inhaling Y. pestis or when infection spreads to the lungs from another form of plague.

Unlike bubonic and septicemic plague, pneumonic plague can spread directly from one person to another through respiratory droplets.

The CDC describes pneumonic plague as the most serious form of plague and says untreated pneumonic plague is almost always fatal. It can also progress rapidly, making early diagnosis and antibiotic treatment critical.

There isn’t a definitive answer to which one is deadlier as we have no simple ranking based purely on fatality percentage because outcomes depend heavily on how quickly treatment begins.

But pneumonic plague is generally regarded as the most dangerous form because it can be rapidly fatal and can spread directly between people.

The World Health Organization says untreated bubonic plague has a case-fatality rate of around 30% to 60%, while pneumonic and septicemic plague can be 100% fatal without treatment. Its incubation period is sometimes as short as one day.

Bubonic plague is less transmissible between humans and is usually more treatable when identified early.

Septicemic plague can also become rapidly life-threatening because the infection has entered the bloodstream.

Also read: Pneumonic Plague: COVID-19, Rhinovirus Detected in Russian Lab Worker’s Contacts; Trump Offers US Help

Russia Plague: Updates

Regarding Russia’s plague scare, the concern around pneumonic plague is not only its severity, but the possibility of respiratory transmission if a case were ever confirmed. No plague infection has been confirmed in the reported Russian case so far.

Russian authorities have repeatedly said there is no confirmed plague outbreak and urged people to rely on official information rather than rumours. The Kremlin has also said the situation is under control.

The WHO has said, based on unofficial information, that the risk to the general public appears to be low.

Meanwhile, the US State Department says it is monitoring the situation. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the possibility of an infectious disease spreading from a laboratory was being watched closely, while stressing that it was not currently a cause for alarm.

There are also reports that preventive measures have been introduced in the region, including isolation of hospital contacts and mask use at a nearby aluminum plant.