MRI scans are strong diagnostics with high-definition images of what lies inside a body. Strong magnetic fields require precaution, as brought out by an instance where a young woman suffered very serious injuries due to an oversight in a metallic core within a silicone sex toy that she happened to have before the MRI scan. This makes a stark reminder about the potentially deadly consequences of missing metal objects when such procedures are being performed. In April 2023, a 23-year-old woman went into an MRI with a silicone plug containing a metal core that was not known.

She thought that the item is made entirely out of silicone according to the advertising. However, the strong magnetic field of the MRI machine interacted with the hidden metal, dragging the object through her body and causing excruciating pain. According to reports from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the scene was harrowing, with the woman screaming in agony and requiring immediate hospitalization. Despite pre-scan screenings, which are routine prior to a scan, the patient did not inform the facility that the object existed because he presumed it was purely non-metallic. This caused serious injuries that led to the patient's law suit against the manufacturer for deceitful misrepresentations of material content.

MRI machines employ magnets between 0.5 to 3 Tesla (T). This is thousands of times stronger than the Earth's magnetic field. The tremendous force causes ferromagnetic materials, like iron and nickel, to be magnetized quickly and become strongly attracted toward the magnet. Objects as small as hairpins or paper clips will accelerate at 40 miles per hour inside the magnetic field.

The force can lead to catastrophic injuries in items lodged within the body, such as metallic implants or foreign objects. Metallic cores within devices, like pacemakers or intrauterine devices, must be disclosed to radiologists to prevent such complications.

How Metal Objects Interact with MRI Fields?

On these claims, Dr. Adam Taylor, a specialist in human anatomy, weighed his words in a international health website and added that the distance away and mass of this object would increase its velocity towards that of sound, "The acceleration would be phenomenal, but with a metallic core, it can't go anywhere near supersonic speeds. As for the size, the magnetic acceleration to the internal soft tissues would ensure that there could be severe intracranial trauma."

The injuries inflicted in this case likely involved damage to major blood vessels, nerves, or organs, highlighting the devastating impact of even minor oversight during an MRI scan.

This is not an isolated case. There are documented cases of metallic objects causing serious damage during MRI scans with a 65-year-old man with schizophrenia swallowed metal objects, including sockets and a hinge pin. The powerful magnetic field during an MRI scan caused the objects to rupture his stomach, resulting in serious injuries.

A toddler who ingested 11 small magnets perforated his bowel while undergoing a scan, making his case unique. In another deadly but extremely rare incident, there have been people who hide a firearm on themselves during MRI procedures. Magnetic attraction can trigger a discharge in a weapon and has led to some fatal injuries.

These cases emphasize the very strong need for adequate screening and patient education prior to an MRI.

Preventing MRI-Related Incidents

Medical professionals have been trained to avoid risks. This is by properly screening a patient for metallic objects. In general, most pre-scan protocols include:

• Patients are interrogated about implants, recent surgery or exposures at work related to metals.
• Radiologists sometimes use handheld metal detectors to search for hidden items.
• People who work with metal, like welders or machinists, will need additional testing to detect microscopic metal fragments within soft tissues or eyes.

The case emphasizes the importance of product labeling by manufacturers, especially those products that are likely to unintentionally cause harm to health. The patient's assumption that her device was 100% silicone points to a larger problem in consumer markets with misinformation.

It also reminds the patients to report any possible dangers to the medical professionals, no matter how the objects look non-metallic. In sensitive cases, patients can request private discussions with healthcare providers to ensure safety without discomfort.

In the end, it is a joint effort from manufacturers, healthcare professionals, and patients that can prevent such tragedies. Manufacturers must ensure truthful marketing, while healthcare providers should educate patients about the dangers of metal objects in MRI settings. For patients, understanding the risks and actively participating in pre-scan disclosures can be lifesaving.

This young woman's experience is a sobering example of the unforeseen dangers posed by MRI machines when precautions are overlooked. It serves as a wake-up call to address gaps in patient awareness, medical protocols, and product transparency. By learning from this incident, the medical community and the public can work together to ensure MRI scans remain a safe and effective diagnostic tool.

The Punjab and Haryana High Court, after 19 years, has finally ended the case of medical reimbursement of heart surgery from a non-empanelled hospital. The surgery happened in 2002. This was a government school teacher, Bhupinder Singh, from Government Elementary School, Phus Mandi, Mansa, who had undergone coronary artery bypass surgery at Escorts Heart Institute and Research Centre in Delhi. The bill was of Rs. 2,20,677 and Rs 11,000 during his admission from November 18 to 30 that year.

Justice Sudeepti Sharma dismissed the earlier regular second appear filed by the State of Punjab, upholding the 2006 order of district judge, Mansa, that allowed the reimbursement.

The court observed that Singh was referred to the hospital through official government channels after an angiography showed serious cardiac issues. It also noted that Escorts Heart Institute was a recognized center for open-heart surgery under a 1991 Punjab government notification, along with Christian Medical College, Ludhiana, and Apollo Hospital, Madras.

Read: Supreme Court Steps In For 31-year-old's Passive Euthanasia Plea Who Has Been In Vegetative State For 10 Years

The Cycle Of Reimbursement Finally Ends

The judgment referred to official records showing that the referral was made by the Punjab Health Systems Corporation because of the patient’s critical condition. It also relied on a 1995 government instruction stating that prior approval from a medical board is not required in life-threatening emergencies.

The court came down strongly on the delay in deciding the case, expressing anguish over the 19-year wait. The judge noted that reimbursement matters should be settled promptly, pointing out that the patient had been pursuing his claim since 2002, only for it to take nearly two decades to reach a decision.

Justice Sharma noted: “The government should be liberal in framing the policies for medical treatment and reimbursement since a person in pain is not expected to choose the hospital and would prefer the nearest one only.”

Read: Andhra Pradesh May Ban Social Media for Under-16s To Protect Teenagers

One More Medical Expense Case Allowed

In another news, in the case of another government employee asking for reimbursement from a non-panelled hospital, the Punjab and Haryana high Court under the judgment directed the Haryana Government to reimburse the remaining medical expenses of a government employee incurred for the emergency treatment of his wife, in a non-empanelled private hospital. Justice Sandeep Moudgil said that the denial of reimbursement without reasons is arbitrary and violative of the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution.

Read: Delhi High Court Permits JNTL to Sell ₹180-Crore ORSL Stock Despite FSSAI Dispute

The court also found a violation of Article 14. It stated that such rigid application or procedural during a pandemic is arbitrary and unequal treatment. The petition was filed by CRPF personnel Balhar Singh, who is seeking the reimbursement for his wife's medical treatment, which were rejected on technical grounds during the COVID-19 pandemic. Singh began his wife's treatment at an empanelled CGHS hospital in Chandigarh, with limited facility, however, he was compelled to seek further cardiac care at a private hospital with better facilities.

"The medical records established that both the petitioner and his wife faced urgent cardiac emergencies, making the treatment unavoidable. The repeated rejection of the petitioner and his wife's medical reimbursement claims during the COVID-19 pandemic amounts to a clear violation of constitutional rights."

Andy Kershaw, the legendary Radio 1 DJ is diagnosed with cancer that has left him "unable to walk". Now 66, Kershaw revealed that tumors found in his spine back in August 2025 has left him unable to walk. He, however joked, as Daily Star reported, "I am determined not to die before Benjamin Netanyahu, Vladimir Putin, Donald Trump and Ant n Dec. That should keep me going for a while."

Kershaw's friend Peter Everett said, "My friend Andy has been going through a difficult time. Last August he was diagnosed with cancer, mainly affecting his spine and making him unable to walk. Since then he has been undergoing treatment, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, physiotherapy and a lot of scans and painkillers. Although we have not been able to put together any podcasts in the last six months, we are very grateful to all the patrons and supporters who have stuck with us."

Andy Kershaw Diagnosis: What Are Spinal Tumors?

A spinal tumor is an abnormal growth of cells within or surrounding your spinal cord. Spine is a long flexible column of bones that protects the spinal cord. Usually the spinal tumors are located inside of the spinal cord, in the tissues that cover spinal cord, between the tissues and bones of spine, or in the bone vertebrae of spine.

Tumors that develop on spine are called spinal tumors. Most spinal tumors result from cancer metastasis, which means the cancer has spread from another area of your body to your spine. However, Kershaw has not clarified how his tumor was detected and whether it has spread from another cancer in the body.

Spinal Cancer: Malignant Tumors of the Spine

Most spinal cancers develop within the spinal column itself and do not directly involve the spinal cord. Several types of cancer can affect the spine, either by starting there or spreading from other parts of the body. These include:

Osteosarcoma: A form of bone cancer that can originate in the spine, though it is more commonly found in the long bones of the legs, such as the thigh and shin.

Chondrosarcoma: This cancer begins in cartilage cells surrounding the bone. While it is rare in the spine, it can sometimes arise as a primary tumor in the bones that make up the spinal column.

Multiple myeloma: A blood cancer that affects plasma cells. These abnormal cells accumulate in the bone marrow and the outer layer of bones, with the spine being a frequent site of involvement.

Lymphoma: A group of cancers that affect lymphocytes, which are key cells of the immune system. Lymphoma can develop in the spine as a primary tumor, but more often it starts elsewhere in the body and later spreads to the spine.

Chordoma: A rare malignant bone tumor that forms within the spinal column. It can occur anywhere along the spine but is most commonly diagnosed in the sacrum, the bone at the base of the spine.

Ewing sarcoma: A cancer that affects both bone and surrounding soft tissue. It is uncommon in adults and accounts for roughly one percent of childhood cancers.

Nearly 100 children were harmed by a Great Ormond Street hospital limb reconstruction surgeon, Yaser Jabbar. A London-based children's hospital's internal review published a study that concluded that 94 out of 789 children who were treated by the doctor between 2017 and 2022, came to harm. Of these, 91 were harmed during surgeries he performed. Jabbar specialized in limb-lengthening and complex bone reconstruction procedures for children, many of which are inherently high-risk.

While the hospital said some complications are expected in such procedures, the investigation found that Jabbar’s practice fell below acceptable standards in multiple areas and that this directly contributed to patient harm. Great Ormond Street Hospital said it was deeply sorry for the suffering caused to children and families.

The BBC has attempted to contact Jabbar. He is understood to be living abroad and no longer holds a license to practice medicine in the UK.

Great Ormond Street Hospital: What Did The Report Find?

According to the report, more than a quarter of Jabbar’s surgical patients experienced harm. Thirty-five children suffered severe harm, while another child experienced severe harm unrelated to surgery.

Independent reviewers highlighted a series of troubling patterns. These included premature removal of bone fixation devices, operations carried out without a clear clinical rationale, incorrect placement of pins, and bone cuts made at the wrong anatomical level. The investigation also criticized how complications were identified and managed, suggesting delays and missed warning signs.

While the report stated it could not definitively determine whether every case of harm was avoidable, it concluded that the standard of care was suboptimal in many instances and that this had undoubtedly worsened outcomes for patients.

Nearly 100 Children Harmed: Families Speak Of Lifelong Trauma And Consequences

Although the report did not name individual cases, several families have previously shared their experiences publicly.

One of them is Bunty, a young girl born with a rare bone condition that left her left leg bowed and shorter than the other. She underwent multiple surgeries performed by Jabbar. Eventually, her lower left leg had to be amputated. Her case was classified as moderate harm.

Her father, Dean Stalham, told BBC, that the findings were “too little, too late” and questioned why concerns were not identified earlier. “These problems should have been spotted long before so many children were hurt,” he said.

According to another parent, Lizzie Roberts, as reported in the BBC, her son Tate was left in constant pain after surgery carried out by Jabbar when he was 16. Tate had been injured in a road accident years earlier, and the surgery was meant to address knee problems. Roberts said an operation was also performed on his ankle without consent and without clinical need.

“He is now facing further surgery and has had to drop out of college,” she said. Tate’s case was also classified as moderate harm.

Both families have called for a police investigation. The Metropolitan Police confirmed to the BBC that it would review the findings of the report to decide whether further action is required.

Questions Are Raised Over Hospital Culture

The investigation was launched in 2024, after concerns were raised internally. It followed a review by the Royal College of Surgeons, commissioned by the hospital, which flagged serious issues around working culture. Staff described the environment as toxic and raised concerns about inappropriate and incorrect surgeries being carried out on children.

Although independent clinicians reviewed patient records, Great Ormond Street Hospital collated and published the final findings. NHS England’s London region is now conducting a separate review into how the hospital handled the case.

The trust said it had already implemented recommendations from the Royal College of Surgeons, including better training on complaints handling, increased whistle-blowing support, and mandatory discussions of the most complex cases with the National Royal Orthopedic Hospital.

However, questions remain. Surgeon Sarah McMahon, who worked in the same service as Jabbar, reportedly raised concerns with hospital management in autumn 2021. According to a statement in Parliament by Dame Meg Hillier, no action was taken at the time.

'Bleakest Day' For Hospital

Great Ormond Street Hospital chief executive Matthew Shaw described the publication of the report as the bleakest day in the hospital’s history. He apologized unreservedly to affected families and said the trust acted quickly once formal concerns were raised in June 2022.

Shaw also pointed to the challenges of monitoring highly specialized surgical fields with very few practitioners nationwide. Still, he said transparency was essential.

“By publishing these findings, we hope to begin rebuilding trust with families,” he said. “They rely on us at the most vulnerable moments of their children’s lives.”