MRI scans are strong diagnostics with high-definition images of what lies inside a body. Strong magnetic fields require precaution, as brought out by an instance where a young woman suffered very serious injuries due to an oversight in a metallic core within a silicone sex toy that she happened to have before the MRI scan. This makes a stark reminder about the potentially deadly consequences of missing metal objects when such procedures are being performed. In April 2023, a 23-year-old woman went into an MRI with a silicone plug containing a metal core that was not known.

She thought that the item is made entirely out of silicone according to the advertising. However, the strong magnetic field of the MRI machine interacted with the hidden metal, dragging the object through her body and causing excruciating pain. According to reports from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the scene was harrowing, with the woman screaming in agony and requiring immediate hospitalization. Despite pre-scan screenings, which are routine prior to a scan, the patient did not inform the facility that the object existed because he presumed it was purely non-metallic. This caused serious injuries that led to the patient's law suit against the manufacturer for deceitful misrepresentations of material content.

MRI machines employ magnets between 0.5 to 3 Tesla (T). This is thousands of times stronger than the Earth's magnetic field. The tremendous force causes ferromagnetic materials, like iron and nickel, to be magnetized quickly and become strongly attracted toward the magnet. Objects as small as hairpins or paper clips will accelerate at 40 miles per hour inside the magnetic field.

The force can lead to catastrophic injuries in items lodged within the body, such as metallic implants or foreign objects. Metallic cores within devices, like pacemakers or intrauterine devices, must be disclosed to radiologists to prevent such complications.

How Metal Objects Interact with MRI Fields?

On these claims, Dr. Adam Taylor, a specialist in human anatomy, weighed his words in a international health website and added that the distance away and mass of this object would increase its velocity towards that of sound, "The acceleration would be phenomenal, but with a metallic core, it can't go anywhere near supersonic speeds. As for the size, the magnetic acceleration to the internal soft tissues would ensure that there could be severe intracranial trauma."

The injuries inflicted in this case likely involved damage to major blood vessels, nerves, or organs, highlighting the devastating impact of even minor oversight during an MRI scan.

This is not an isolated case. There are documented cases of metallic objects causing serious damage during MRI scans with a 65-year-old man with schizophrenia swallowed metal objects, including sockets and a hinge pin. The powerful magnetic field during an MRI scan caused the objects to rupture his stomach, resulting in serious injuries.

A toddler who ingested 11 small magnets perforated his bowel while undergoing a scan, making his case unique. In another deadly but extremely rare incident, there have been people who hide a firearm on themselves during MRI procedures. Magnetic attraction can trigger a discharge in a weapon and has led to some fatal injuries.

These cases emphasize the very strong need for adequate screening and patient education prior to an MRI.

Preventing MRI-Related Incidents

Medical professionals have been trained to avoid risks. This is by properly screening a patient for metallic objects. In general, most pre-scan protocols include:

• Patients are interrogated about implants, recent surgery or exposures at work related to metals.
• Radiologists sometimes use handheld metal detectors to search for hidden items.
• People who work with metal, like welders or machinists, will need additional testing to detect microscopic metal fragments within soft tissues or eyes.

The case emphasizes the importance of product labeling by manufacturers, especially those products that are likely to unintentionally cause harm to health. The patient's assumption that her device was 100% silicone points to a larger problem in consumer markets with misinformation.

It also reminds the patients to report any possible dangers to the medical professionals, no matter how the objects look non-metallic. In sensitive cases, patients can request private discussions with healthcare providers to ensure safety without discomfort.

In the end, it is a joint effort from manufacturers, healthcare professionals, and patients that can prevent such tragedies. Manufacturers must ensure truthful marketing, while healthcare providers should educate patients about the dangers of metal objects in MRI settings. For patients, understanding the risks and actively participating in pre-scan disclosures can be lifesaving.

This young woman's experience is a sobering example of the unforeseen dangers posed by MRI machines when precautions are overlooked. It serves as a wake-up call to address gaps in patient awareness, medical protocols, and product transparency. By learning from this incident, the medical community and the public can work together to ensure MRI scans remain a safe and effective diagnostic tool.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced nationwide recalls of two blood pressure medications over concerns about excess drug levels and manufacturing quality failures.

The recalls involve combination medications prescribed to manage hypertension. The FDA cited concerns that one medication may contain more of an active ingredient than specified, while the other failed quality tests that assess how quickly the drug dissolves in the body.

Which Blood Pressure Medications Have Been Recalled?

Also read: US FDA Recalls India-Made BP Drug For The Second Time In 3 Months: Here's Why

1. Viatris blood pressure medication: 21,620 bottles recalled

The FDA has announced a Class III recall of Viatris Inc.'s combination telmisartan and amlodipine tablets because they may contain more telmisartan than specified.

The Class III recall means the use of the affected product is not likely to cause adverse health consequences.

The FDA did not specify how much additional telmisartan the tablets may contain. However, the National Library of Medicine warns that an overdose of this medication could cause low blood pressure, dizziness or a rapid heart rate.

In total, 21,620 bottles of the medication have been recalled.

The recall covers 30-count bottles of telmisartan and amlodipine tablets (40 mg/5 mg) with the following lot codes:

• Lots 3228113, 3228114 and 3228115, with an expiration date of October 31.
• Lots 3228120 and 3228121, with an expiration date of November 30.

2. Macleods Pharmaceuticals blood pressure medication: 3,744 bottles recalled

The FDA has also recalled 3,744 bottles of another combination blood pressure medication manufactured by Macleods Pharmaceuticals.

The company first initiated the recall on October 7 over "failed dissolution specifications." This means the medication may not release its active ingredients at the required rate after being taken.

If a drug does not dissolve properly, its active ingredients may not be absorbed as intended, potentially affecting its effectiveness. In this case, the medication may not lower blood pressure as expected.

On October 26, the FDA classified the recall as Class II. This means using the affected product may cause temporary or medically reversible adverse health consequences, although serious health problems are unlikely.

The recall covers:

• Olmesartan Medoxomil, Amlodipine and Hydrochlorothiazide Tablets (40 mg/10 mg/12.5 mg), 30-count: 3,528 bottles; NDC 33342-246-07; lot number 12251163A; expiration date May 31, 2027.
• Olmesartan Medoxomil, Amlodipine and Hydrochlorothiazide Tablets (40 mg/10 mg/12.5 mg), 90-count: 216 bottles; NDC 33342-246-10; lot number 12251163B; expiration date May 31, 2027.

Read More: Mounjaro, Zepbound Ingredient Recalled In US Over Sterility Concerns

What Should You Do If You Have The Recalled Medication?

The FDA advises patients not to stop taking their medication without consulting their healthcare provider, as abruptly discontinuing blood pressure treatment may pose additional health risks.

If you have any of the affected products, contact your doctor or pharmacist for guidance on whether you should continue taking them or switch to an alternative.

For the Macleods Pharmaceuticals medication, the FDA did not issue a separate news release. Its enforcement report states that letters were sent to notify businesses and individuals who may have the affected products.

Patients should consult their healthcare provider before making any changes to their medication routine.

A child recently died in Lewis County amid an ongoing measles outbreak, marking New York state's first measles-related death in more than 30 years. The New York State Department of Health and Lewis County Public Health confirmed the death in a joint statement on November 2.

Officials did not release more information about the child or the circumstances surrounding the death to protect the family's privacy.

The death comes as measles cases continue to rise across the United States. New York had recorded 178 cases in 2026 as of October 24, including eight in New York City, according to health officials.

Last month, Governor Kathy Hochul declared a state disaster emergency. The order gave registered nurses the authority to order specimen collection and testing for measles cases.

US Reports More Than 4,800 Measles Cases In 2026

Also read: EXCLUSIVE: Ex-CDC Vaccine Advisor Says Measles Outbreak Bigger Than Reported, Slams RFK Jr’s ‘No-See Evil’ Approach

The outbreak in New York is part of a wider resurgence of measles across the country. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported 4,852 confirmed cases as of October 29, 2026, the highest annual total since 1991.

In an exclusive interview with HealthandMe, Dr Paul Offit, paediatrician and director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and former member of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, said that the reported number of measles cases in the US could underestimate the actual scale of transmission. “You can assume that's off by a factor of at least five."

The CDC said 96% of confirmed cases this year were linked to outbreaks. It has also reported that at least 96% of cases have occurred among people who were unvaccinated.

Declining vaccination coverage has contributed to the growing measles transmission. During the 2025-2026 school year, 92.4% of US kindergarteners had received the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine, below the 95% coverage level generally needed to maintain community protection.

When Can Measles Become Life-Threatening?

Also read: 'It’s The Best-Studied Vaccine In Human History': Former CDC Adviser Busts Common Myths About COVID Vaccines

Measles is a highly contagious viral infection that spreads through the air when an infected person coughs or sneezes. The virus can remain infectious in the air for up to two hours after an infected person has left a space.

Early symptoms include high fever, cough, runny nose and red, watery eyes. Small white spots called Koplik spots may appear inside the mouth, followed by a rash that begins on the face and spreads down the body.

While many people recover, measles can cause serious complications, including pneumonia and encephalitis, or inflammation of the brain. These complications can lead to hospitalisation and, in some cases, death. Young children, pregnant women and people with weakened immune systems are vulnerable to the illness.

MMR Vaccine Is The Best Protection Against Measles

The CDC recommends two doses of the MMR vaccine. The first is given between 12 and 15 months of age, while the second is recommended between four and six years.

One dose is approximately 93% effective against measles infection, while two doses are about 97% effective, according to the CDC.

Infants aged six to 11 months who live in or are travelling to areas with a high risk of measles exposure may be advised to receive an early dose. However, this dose does not replace the two routine doses recommended after the child's first birthday..

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted tentative approval to Dr. Reddy's Laboratories for the first generic version of lenacapavir, a long-acting injectable for HIV prevention. The development raises hopes of making HIV prevention more affordable in 120 low- and middle-income countries, including India.

The approval is considered “tentative”, the FDA’s standard designation for generics while the originator remains under patent.

The development comes just 16 months after Gilead Sciences received approval for its original product, marking one of the fastest timelines for a major HIV innovation.

Lenacapavir is the first twice-yearly injectable pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) option for HIV prevention. Dr. Reddy's generic injection is expected to cost US$40 per person annually across the 120 eligible countries, with initial supplies expected by the end of 2026.

Calling it “a moment of immense pride”, Deepak Sapra, Chief Executive Officer, API and Services, at Dr. Reddy's, said the FDA approval validates the company's efforts to expand access to twice-yearly HIV prevention across low- and middle-income countries.

Also read: South Africa Receives 1st Batch Of HIV Prevention Medicine Lenacapavir

Dr Reddy's First Of 6 Generic Drugmakers To Get FDA Nod

In October 2024, Gilead Sciences signed voluntary licensing agreements with six generic manufacturers to produce and supply low-cost versions of lenacapavir in 120 low- and middle-income countries.

The six manufacturers are:

• Dr. Reddy's Laboratories (India)
• Emcure Pharmaceuticals (India)
• Hetero Labs (India)
• Eva Pharma (Egypt)
• Ferozsons Laboratories (Pakistan)
• Mylan (a subsidiary of Viatris)

Dr. Reddy's is the first among the six licensees to receive tentative US FDA approval. The other five companies are at various stages of product development, bioequivalence testing and regulatory filing.

What Will Cheaper Lenacapavir Mean For India?

At its August 11, 2026, meeting, the Indian drug regulator's Subject Expert Committee recommended waiving local Phase III clinical trials and bioequivalence studies for generic injectable lenacapavir applications submitted by Dr. Reddy's and Emcure Pharmaceuticals for PrEP.

The proposed price of approximately US$40 per person annually could make twice-yearly HIV prevention more accessible.

However, this is an indicative price for generic supplies, not a confirmed retail price in India. The eventual Indian price will depend on regulatory approval, manufacturing costs, supply capacity, competition and distribution.

Read More: Exclusive With Leading HIV Expert: What's Driving Rising HIV Cases Among India's Youth And How To Prevent It

What Does The Approval Mean For HIV Prevention?

Generic lenacapavir could offer people at risk of HIV an alternative to daily oral PrEP pills. Its twice-yearly dosing may help those who struggle with daily medication adherence or face stigma and barriers to healthcare access.

“For someone at risk of HIV, taking a pill every day to prevent a disease they do not have is a hard thing to ask. Two injections a year of a product that is almost 100% effective at preventing HIV changes that entirely.”

“Generic lenacapavir has the potential to transform HIV prevention, and this is a significant milestone, but an affordable drug alone is not enough,” said Professor Saiqa Mullick, Director of Implementation Science at Wits RHI, University of the Witwatersrand, which partnered with Dr. Reddy's.

Lenacapavir: How Does It Work?

Lenacapavir is a long-acting antiretroviral drug developed by Gilead. For HIV prevention, it is administered as two injections in the abdomen, providing protection for six months.

People must test negative for HIV before receiving it. The drug does not treat existing HIV infections or prevent other sexually transmitted infections.

Two major clinical trials demonstrated its high efficacy. In one study involving adolescent girls and young women in South Africa and Uganda, there were zero new HIV infections among participants who received lenacapavir. A second trial involving gay men and gender-diverse individuals also demonstrated high efficacy with twice-yearly injections.