MRI scans are strong diagnostics with high-definition images of what lies inside a body. Strong magnetic fields require precaution, as brought out by an instance where a young woman suffered very serious injuries due to an oversight in a metallic core within a silicone sex toy that she happened to have before the MRI scan. This makes a stark reminder about the potentially deadly consequences of missing metal objects when such procedures are being performed. In April 2023, a 23-year-old woman went into an MRI with a silicone plug containing a metal core that was not known.

She thought that the item is made entirely out of silicone according to the advertising. However, the strong magnetic field of the MRI machine interacted with the hidden metal, dragging the object through her body and causing excruciating pain. According to reports from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the scene was harrowing, with the woman screaming in agony and requiring immediate hospitalization. Despite pre-scan screenings, which are routine prior to a scan, the patient did not inform the facility that the object existed because he presumed it was purely non-metallic. This caused serious injuries that led to the patient's law suit against the manufacturer for deceitful misrepresentations of material content.

MRI machines employ magnets between 0.5 to 3 Tesla (T). This is thousands of times stronger than the Earth's magnetic field. The tremendous force causes ferromagnetic materials, like iron and nickel, to be magnetized quickly and become strongly attracted toward the magnet. Objects as small as hairpins or paper clips will accelerate at 40 miles per hour inside the magnetic field.

The force can lead to catastrophic injuries in items lodged within the body, such as metallic implants or foreign objects. Metallic cores within devices, like pacemakers or intrauterine devices, must be disclosed to radiologists to prevent such complications.

How Metal Objects Interact with MRI Fields?

On these claims, Dr. Adam Taylor, a specialist in human anatomy, weighed his words in a international health website and added that the distance away and mass of this object would increase its velocity towards that of sound, "The acceleration would be phenomenal, but with a metallic core, it can't go anywhere near supersonic speeds. As for the size, the magnetic acceleration to the internal soft tissues would ensure that there could be severe intracranial trauma."

The injuries inflicted in this case likely involved damage to major blood vessels, nerves, or organs, highlighting the devastating impact of even minor oversight during an MRI scan.

This is not an isolated case. There are documented cases of metallic objects causing serious damage during MRI scans with a 65-year-old man with schizophrenia swallowed metal objects, including sockets and a hinge pin. The powerful magnetic field during an MRI scan caused the objects to rupture his stomach, resulting in serious injuries.

A toddler who ingested 11 small magnets perforated his bowel while undergoing a scan, making his case unique. In another deadly but extremely rare incident, there have been people who hide a firearm on themselves during MRI procedures. Magnetic attraction can trigger a discharge in a weapon and has led to some fatal injuries.

These cases emphasize the very strong need for adequate screening and patient education prior to an MRI.

Preventing MRI-Related Incidents

Medical professionals have been trained to avoid risks. This is by properly screening a patient for metallic objects. In general, most pre-scan protocols include:

• Patients are interrogated about implants, recent surgery or exposures at work related to metals.
• Radiologists sometimes use handheld metal detectors to search for hidden items.
• People who work with metal, like welders or machinists, will need additional testing to detect microscopic metal fragments within soft tissues or eyes.

The case emphasizes the importance of product labeling by manufacturers, especially those products that are likely to unintentionally cause harm to health. The patient's assumption that her device was 100% silicone points to a larger problem in consumer markets with misinformation.

It also reminds the patients to report any possible dangers to the medical professionals, no matter how the objects look non-metallic. In sensitive cases, patients can request private discussions with healthcare providers to ensure safety without discomfort.

In the end, it is a joint effort from manufacturers, healthcare professionals, and patients that can prevent such tragedies. Manufacturers must ensure truthful marketing, while healthcare providers should educate patients about the dangers of metal objects in MRI settings. For patients, understanding the risks and actively participating in pre-scan disclosures can be lifesaving.

This young woman's experience is a sobering example of the unforeseen dangers posed by MRI machines when precautions are overlooked. It serves as a wake-up call to address gaps in patient awareness, medical protocols, and product transparency. By learning from this incident, the medical community and the public can work together to ensure MRI scans remain a safe and effective diagnostic tool.

Health officials at the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC) today confirmed that the current Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda is being caused by the rare Bundibugyo strain.

Bundibugyo ebolavirus was first isolated during an outbreak of hemorrhagic fever in Uganda in 2007. There are no vaccines or specific treatments approved to prevent or treat the Bundibugyo strain.

Preliminary laboratory results from the Institut National de Recherche Biomedicale (INRB) detected Ebola virus in 13 of 20 samples tested with the Bundibugyo Virus.

"Africa CDC is actively collaborating with health authorities in DRC, Uganda, and regional partners to deliver a coordinated response to confirmed Ebola Virus Disease cases linked to the Bundibugyo strain," the Africa CDC said in a statement.

"Rapid laboratory testing, contact tracing, cross-border surveillance, and enhanced infection prevention measures are already deployed to protect communities and stop the spread," it added.

Ebola Outbreak: Cases And Deaths

As of the latest update from DRC, approximately 246 suspected cases and 65 deaths have been reported, mainly in Mongwalu and Rwampara health zones.

Four deaths have been reported among laboratory-confirmed cases.

Suspected cases have also been reported in Bunia and are pending confirmation. These figures remain provisional and are being validated through laboratory confirmation, line-list harmonization, contact identification, and epidemiological investigation.

Also read: Ebola Resurfaces In Eastern DR Congo In 17th Outbreak, Claims 65 Lives: All You Need To Know

Ebola Bundibugyo Virus Kills Ugandan Man

Uganda’s Ministry of Health, in a statement, reported a confirmed Ebola Bundibugyo Virus Disease case in a 59-year-old Congolese male who was admitted to Kibuli Muslim Hospital on May 11 and died on May 14.

The country's officials reported the case as imported from DRC and have indicated that no local case has yet been confirmed.

Africa CDC noted that it remains concerned by the urban context of Bunia and Rwampara, with intense population movement, insecurity, mining-related mobility in Mongwalu, gaps in contact listing, infection prevention and control challenges, and the proximity of affected areas to Uganda and South Sudan.

What Is Bundibugyo Virus Disease?

Bundibugyo virus disease is a rare and deadly illness that has caused outbreaks in several African countries in the past.

It is also spread by contact with contaminated objects (such as clothing, bedding, needles, and medical equipment), or by contact with animals, such as bats and nonhuman primates, that are infected with BVD.

Symptoms include fever, headache, muscle pain, weakness, diarrhea, vomiting, stomach pain, and unexplained bleeding or bruising (a late stage of illness).

Read More: National Dengue Day 2026: India Reports 6,927 Cases And 10 Deaths In 2026

Ebola Outbreak: Here's How To Prevent

The US CDC advised people to avoid:

• contact with people who have symptoms such as fever, muscle pain, and rash
• contact with blood and other body fluids or objects that are contaminated with them
• visiting healthcare facilities in the affected areas for nonurgent medical care or for non-medical reasons. Avoid visiting traditional healers in the affected areas
• contact with dead bodies or items that have been in contact with dead bodies
• participating in funeral or burial practices that involve touching the body of someone who has died
• contact with bats, forest antelopes, nonhuman primates (e.g., monkeys, chimpanzees, gorillas), and blood, fluids, or raw meat from these or unknown animals.
• going into areas where bats live, such as mines or caves.

In case of infection, the CDC advises:

• Monitoring for symptoms of BVD while in the outbreak area and for 21 days after leaving.
• If you develop fever, headache, muscle pain, weakness, diarrhea, vomiting, stomach pain, and unexplained bleeding or bruising (a late stage of illness)
• Isolate immediately
• Do not travel.
• Contact local health authorities

Even as the world is still grappling with the news of a hantavirus and two separate norovirus outbreaks, the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC) today confirmed that the Ebola virus has resurfaced in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo for the 17th time.

In a statement, the Africa CDC reported that there are 246 suspected cases and 65 deaths, mainly in the mining areas of Mongwalu and Rwampara, about 100 kilometers north of the provincial capital, Bunia.

While tests are being carried out to identify the strain of the virus, early indications suggest the strain is not the Zaire variant, which has been responsible for several previous outbreaks in the country, the health officials said.

The Ebola Zaire strain was prominent in Congo’s past outbreaks, including the 2018 to 2020 outbreak in the eastern region that killed more than 1,000 people.

Ebola: 17th outbreak in DR Congo

Ebola was first discovered in 1976 in the DR Congo. This is the 17th outbreak of the deadly viral disease in the country.

As per preliminary tests conducted at the Institut National de Recherche Biomédicale (INRB) in the country's capital, Kinshasa, the Ebola virus has been detected in 13 of 20 samples analysed, following consultations with DR Congo's Ministry of Health and National Public Institute.

Of the 65 deaths, four were reported among lab-confirmed cases, Africa CDC said.

Additional suspected cases have also been reported in Ituri's provincial capital, Bunia, a densely populated urban centre near the borders with Uganda and South Sudan, raising fears of regional transmission.

All affected communities and at-risk areas have been advised to follow guidelines from the national health authorities.

Also read: More Americans Exposed To Hantavirus; 41 Under Monitoring, Says CDC

What Is Ebola Virus Disease?

As per the WHO, Ebola virus disease (EVD) is a rare but severe illness in humans and is often fatal.

People can get infected with the virus if they touch an infected animal when preparing food, or touch body fluids of an infected person, such as saliva, urine, feces, or semen, or things that have body fluids of an infected person, like clothes or sheets.

How Does Transmission Work?

Read More: Another Norovirus Outbreak Confirmed Aboard Cruise Ship In France; Over 1,700 People Trapped

Ebola enters the body through cuts in the skin or when one touches their eyes, nose, or mouth. Early symptoms include fever, fatigue, and headache.

It is a highly infectious and transmissible disease; in fact, there have been cases of healthcare workers who have frequently been infected while treating patients with suspected or confirmed Ebola. This occurs through close contact with patients when infection control precautions are not practiced strictly.

Cases of people conducting burial ceremonies, involving direct contact with the body of the deceased, can lead to the transmission of Ebola. Even after the long suffering and recovery, there is a possibility of sexual transmission. Pregnant women who get acute Ebola and recover may still carry the virus in their breastmilk or in pregnancy-related fluids and tissues.

Symptoms include:

• feeling tired
• headache
• muscle and joint pain
• eye pain and vision problems
• weight gain
• belly pain and loss of appetite
• hair loss and skin problems
• trouble sleeping
• memory loss
• hearing loss
• depression and anxiety.

Is There Any Vaccine for Ebola?

According to the WHO, there are two vaccines against the Ebola virus. But both the Merck-developed Ervebo vaccine, administered in one dose, and Johnson & Johnson-developed Zabdeno and Mvabea vaccine, administered in a two-dose regimen, target Zaire ebolavirus.

The Ervebo vaccine is recommended for use in outbreak settings and is currently the only vaccine available in the global stockpile.

The hantavirus outbreak may no longer be confined to the luxury Dutch cruise ship MV Hondius, with health officials now assessing the possibility of wider exposure. Officials at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said that although no cases have been reported in the US so far, the agency is monitoring 41 people for possible exposure.

The 41 includes the 18 people evacuated from the hantavirus-hit ship from Spain’s Canary Islands.

Notably, of the 18 passengers evacuated, two were carried in the plane's biocontainment units out of an abundance of caution — one who tested positive and another considered a suspected case. They were quarantined at a special facility in Nebraska. The remaining 16 are being quarantined in Omaha and Atlanta.

Speaking to CNN from a biocontainment unit at the University of Nebraska Medical Center in Omaha, Dr. Stephen Kornfeld of Oregon said he “feels wonderful” and is not experiencing symptoms.

Spanish officials confirmed that after initially testing positive for hantavirus, Dr. Kornfeld has since tested negative twice for the disease, meaning no Americans currently have the illness, Forbes reported.

CDC Monitoring More People

However, an additional 16 people are being monitored by the CDC.

The new individuals were not on the cruise ship but were passengers on an April 25 flight to Johannesburg and were exposed to someone known to have been infected, said Dr. David Fitter, who is leading the CDC response to the outbreak, according to The New York Times.

Also read: Shocking Study Finds Andes Hantavirus Could Linger In Semen For Years, Pose Transmission Risk

Seven other passengers from the cruise ship had disembarked on April 24 in St. Helena, an island in the Atlantic Ocean, returned to the US on commercial flights, and are being monitored by state health departments.

As of May 14, there were no confirmed hantavirus cases in the United States, Dr. Fitter said.

“Our job is to ensure that we are monitoring and in contact with anybody that might have been on the flight this person had taken,” Dr. Fitter told reporters. The agency is “monitoring all Americans that potentially would have been exposed, whether in the US or abroad, and we have been in contact with them,” he said.

Hantavirus Outbreak: 11 Cases And 3 Deaths Reported

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), 10 people have been affected by the rat-borne virus so far, of whom three have died.

A Dutch couple is believed to have first been exposed to the virus while visiting a birdwatching site in Argentina.

The WHO has confirmed that the Andes strain of hantavirus — the only strain known to spread from person to person — is behind the outbreak.

While all passengers onboard the cruise have been taken care of by health authorities, the virus’ long incubation period remains a serious concern. This means that even asymptomatic individuals could potentially become infectious 6-8 weeks later.

WHO Guidelines On Hantavirus Exposure

The WHO recommends that people exposed to hantavirus should be:

• Monitored actively at a specified quarantine facility
• Monitored at home for 42 days from the last exposure