MRI scans are strong diagnostics with high-definition images of what lies inside a body. Strong magnetic fields require precaution, as brought out by an instance where a young woman suffered very serious injuries due to an oversight in a metallic core within a silicone sex toy that she happened to have before the MRI scan. This makes a stark reminder about the potentially deadly consequences of missing metal objects when such procedures are being performed. In April 2023, a 23-year-old woman went into an MRI with a silicone plug containing a metal core that was not known.

She thought that the item is made entirely out of silicone according to the advertising. However, the strong magnetic field of the MRI machine interacted with the hidden metal, dragging the object through her body and causing excruciating pain. According to reports from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the scene was harrowing, with the woman screaming in agony and requiring immediate hospitalization. Despite pre-scan screenings, which are routine prior to a scan, the patient did not inform the facility that the object existed because he presumed it was purely non-metallic. This caused serious injuries that led to the patient's law suit against the manufacturer for deceitful misrepresentations of material content.

MRI machines employ magnets between 0.5 to 3 Tesla (T). This is thousands of times stronger than the Earth's magnetic field. The tremendous force causes ferromagnetic materials, like iron and nickel, to be magnetized quickly and become strongly attracted toward the magnet. Objects as small as hairpins or paper clips will accelerate at 40 miles per hour inside the magnetic field.

The force can lead to catastrophic injuries in items lodged within the body, such as metallic implants or foreign objects. Metallic cores within devices, like pacemakers or intrauterine devices, must be disclosed to radiologists to prevent such complications.

How Metal Objects Interact with MRI Fields?

On these claims, Dr. Adam Taylor, a specialist in human anatomy, weighed his words in a international health website and added that the distance away and mass of this object would increase its velocity towards that of sound, "The acceleration would be phenomenal, but with a metallic core, it can't go anywhere near supersonic speeds. As for the size, the magnetic acceleration to the internal soft tissues would ensure that there could be severe intracranial trauma."

The injuries inflicted in this case likely involved damage to major blood vessels, nerves, or organs, highlighting the devastating impact of even minor oversight during an MRI scan.

This is not an isolated case. There are documented cases of metallic objects causing serious damage during MRI scans with a 65-year-old man with schizophrenia swallowed metal objects, including sockets and a hinge pin. The powerful magnetic field during an MRI scan caused the objects to rupture his stomach, resulting in serious injuries.

A toddler who ingested 11 small magnets perforated his bowel while undergoing a scan, making his case unique. In another deadly but extremely rare incident, there have been people who hide a firearm on themselves during MRI procedures. Magnetic attraction can trigger a discharge in a weapon and has led to some fatal injuries.

These cases emphasize the very strong need for adequate screening and patient education prior to an MRI.

Preventing MRI-Related Incidents

Medical professionals have been trained to avoid risks. This is by properly screening a patient for metallic objects. In general, most pre-scan protocols include:

• Patients are interrogated about implants, recent surgery or exposures at work related to metals.
• Radiologists sometimes use handheld metal detectors to search for hidden items.
• People who work with metal, like welders or machinists, will need additional testing to detect microscopic metal fragments within soft tissues or eyes.

The case emphasizes the importance of product labeling by manufacturers, especially those products that are likely to unintentionally cause harm to health. The patient's assumption that her device was 100% silicone points to a larger problem in consumer markets with misinformation.

It also reminds the patients to report any possible dangers to the medical professionals, no matter how the objects look non-metallic. In sensitive cases, patients can request private discussions with healthcare providers to ensure safety without discomfort.

In the end, it is a joint effort from manufacturers, healthcare professionals, and patients that can prevent such tragedies. Manufacturers must ensure truthful marketing, while healthcare providers should educate patients about the dangers of metal objects in MRI settings. For patients, understanding the risks and actively participating in pre-scan disclosures can be lifesaving.

This young woman's experience is a sobering example of the unforeseen dangers posed by MRI machines when precautions are overlooked. It serves as a wake-up call to address gaps in patient awareness, medical protocols, and product transparency. By learning from this incident, the medical community and the public can work together to ensure MRI scans remain a safe and effective diagnostic tool.

Even as the Ebola outbreak caused by the rare Bundibugyo Ebola virus continues to spread, a new case study has revealed a striking finding: the lesser-known virus can remain at very high levels in a patient’s throat.

Ebola viruses are primarily known to attack the vascular system, damaging blood vessel integrity and disrupting the body’s ability to clot. This can lead to severe fluid loss, organ failure and, in some cases, internal or external bleeding.

However, a case study of a 39-year-old American healthcare worker infected with Bundibugyo Ebola virus in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) found that his throat carried more than 10 times as much viral RNA as his blood.

The patient was later medically evacuated to Germany, where he received experimental treatment at a high-level isolation unit in Berlin.

Throat Carried 10 Times More Virus

On day five of illness, testing showed:

• Throat: About 90 million viral RNA copies/mL
• Blood plasma: About 7 million copies/mL
• Difference: The throat had more than 10 times the viral RNA found in blood.

The case was published in Nature Medicine by researchers from Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, with collaborators including the CDC, US Department of State, Robert Koch Institute, Emory University and Congo’s Institut National de Recherche Biomédicale.

How Was He Exposed?

The healthcare worker had performed an ultrasound nine days before symptoms began.

Eight days before symptoms, he performed two surgeries using standard personal protective equipment and reported no specific high-risk exposure.

He voluntarily isolated himself when symptoms began. His early symptoms included:

• Severe muscle pain and malaise
• 38.9°C fever despite acetaminophen
• Positive pan-Ebola PCR on plasma by day two

By day three, he developed abdominal pain, vomiting, confusion and orthostatic symptoms.

Experimental Treatment Was Given

Bundibugyo Ebola virus has so far caused three recorded outbreaks, but there are currently no licensed vaccines or specific treatments for the disease.

The patient had received a dose of rVSV-ZEBOV 41 months earlier, but that vaccine targets the Zaire species.

He received the investigational antibody cocktail MBP134 on day four, along with a 200 mg loading dose of remdesivir off-label.

He reached Berlin on day five with thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia and elevated liver enzymes.

Viral RNA Cleared From Most Samples

By day 13, viral RNA was below detection levels in his:

• Plasma
• Throat
• Urine
• Stool

However, the virus was still detected in semen on day 20 but was gone by day 25. Three laboratories failed to culture live virus from throat, plasma or semen samples, the report said.

The researchers cautioned that this cannot be directly attributed to MBP134 because pre-treatment culture data were unavailable. The patient was discharged 22 days after symptom onset.

His Immune System Also Responded

Researchers found rising antibodies against the virus between days five and six, along with virus-specific IgM and IgA, suggesting that his own immune system mounted a response despite receiving monoclonal antibodies.

However, the researchers stressed that the case does not prove MBP134, remdesivir or their combination works. Larger studies are needed.

Congo Ebola Outbreak

Congo declared the outbreak in Ituri Province on May 15, 2026, followed by a WHO public health emergency of international concern two days later.

As of August 22, the ECDC reported:

• 5,514 confirmed cases
• 2,642 deaths
• 4,607 cases and 2,065 deaths in Ituri

The Cyclospora outbreak ongoing in the US since May this year has reached 17,180 cases, compared with 1,180 cases through August last year, according to the latest figures released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

The cases, reported across 48 states plus the District of Columbia, include two deaths, while 922 people have been hospitalized.

In addition, the CDC is investigating 11,844 additional cases that have not yet been laboratory-confirmed. The federal agency added that the true number of people sick with cyclosporiasis is likely higher because some people recover without medical care and are not tested for Cyclospora.

“Recent illnesses may not yet be reported due to the time it takes to identify and report Cyclospora cases. It can take about six weeks from the start of symptoms to when CDC receives the case information,” the CDC said.

Cyclospora Cases Expected To Dwindle

Historically, the cyclosporiasis season in the United States runs from May 1 through August 31, so cases should dwindle as summer ends, the CDC said.

The largest outbreak this summer was reported in Michigan. Last week, Michigan noted a 3% increase in cases, bringing the state's total to 14,277 cases.

Outbreak Linked To Iceberg Lettuce

The outbreak has been linked to iceberg lettuce, particularly lettuce produced by Taylor Farms de Mexico. The lettuce was sold at stores and at Taco Bell restaurants across the US before it was recalled.

Cyclosporiasis is caused by a parasite that spreads through food and water contaminated with infected human feces.

The Food and Drug Administration, which oversees food safety, has said it is “confident that all recalled iceberg lettuce related to this specific Cyclospora outbreak is off the market.”

While an average American reportedly eats about 18.3 pounds of lettuce each year, consumers purchased about 7.6 million fewer pounds of lettuce during the four weeks ending July 18 compared with the same period last year, according to The Wall Street Journal.

Is It Safe To Eat Lettuce Right Now?

Food safety experts noted that people can eat lettuce now, but should choose their greens wisely.

“Consumers should make informed choices rather than avoiding leafy greens altogether,” said Darin Detwiler, a professor at Northeastern University, Food & Wine reported.

Because the recalls so far are tied to specific products from one producer and have not expanded to include other lettuce producers, other products are likely OK, Detwiler said.

“Consumers should follow FDA and CDC recall information rather than assuming every leafy green product is unsafe,” he said.

Wade Syers, an extension specialist for food safety at Michigan State University Extension, said the ongoing Cyclospora investigation “does not mean all lettuce or all leafy greens are unsafe.”

How To Prevent Cyclospora Infection

To reduce the risk of infection, the CDC recommends:

• Wash your hands before handling food.
• Wash fresh produce under running water before eating, preparing or cooking it.
• Cook food to at least 158°F (70°C) to kill Cyclospora.
• Follow CDC and FDA recall notices and avoid recalled products.
• Avoid bagged salad mixes.

Food safety has become a serious concern in the US in recent months, with a large number of products recalled over contamination, bacterial infections, and other health risks.

The latest recalls involve rice over potential foreign material contamination and mini doughnuts over undeclared milk that may trigger allergic reactions.

Mini Donuts Recalled Over Undeclared Milk

Packages of mini donuts sold nationwide are being recalled after a consumer reported an allergic reaction linked to the product, USA Today reported.

According to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Better Bakehouse Snack Company is recalling certain lots of Donutful Chocolate Dipped Vanilla Cake Donuts because they may contain undeclared milk.

People with a milk allergy or severe sensitivity to milk could face a serious or life-threatening allergic reaction if they consume the affected product, the FDA said.

The food regulator noted that the consumer who suffered the allergic reaction has fully recovered. The manufacturer has identified the cause of the mislabeling and taken corrective measures.

Also read: From Dog Food To Fruit Bars: Over 10 Products Recalled In US Over Contamination

Which Doughnuts Are Being Recalled?

The recalled doughnuts are limited to a specific lot manufactured and distributed in March 2026. The product was shipped to retailers nationwide and sold through Amazon.

Consumers should check the following details to determine whether they have the recalled product:

• Product: Donutful Chocolate Dipped Vanilla Cake Donuts, 10 Mini Donuts
• Package: 7.05-ounce carton containing five 1.41-ounce (40g) pouches
• UPC: 3 50041 39210 3
• Best If Used By: September 15, 2026
• Lot Code: 26078

The FDA advises consumers to dispose of the affected product and obtain a refund from the point of purchase with a receipt, or return the product for a refund.

54,648 Pounds of Rice Recalled Over Foreign Material

An FDA update on August 25 provides more details about an April 2026 rice recall involving Lundberg Family Farms.

The company's Jasmine white rice was recalled because of potential contamination with foreign materials.

According to the FDA, 27,324 packages of 32-ounce rice were recalled, totaling 54,648 pounds. Lundberg-branded rice was also part of the recall initiated by the FDA in April this year.

The recalled rice was distributed in:

• California
• Connecticut
• Florida
• Illinois
• North Carolina
• New Hampshire
• New York
• Pennsylvania
• Tennessee
• Vermont
• Washington
• Wisconsin

Consumers can identify the affected products using these details:

• UPC: 073416040281
• Lot/Best Before: 260201MA, 01FEB2027; 260202MA, 02FEB2027

The expiration dates are February 1 and February 2, 2027. Consumers who were unaware of the earlier recall announcements may still have the affected product at home.

What Is the Risk From the Recalled Rice?

The recall follows the FDA's May 7 Class II classification.

According to the FDA, a Class II recall involves a situation in which use of or exposure to a violative product may cause temporary or medically reversible adverse health consequences, or where the likelihood of serious adverse health consequences is remote.