MRI scans are strong diagnostics with high-definition images of what lies inside a body. Strong magnetic fields require precaution, as brought out by an instance where a young woman suffered very serious injuries due to an oversight in a metallic core within a silicone sex toy that she happened to have before the MRI scan. This makes a stark reminder about the potentially deadly consequences of missing metal objects when such procedures are being performed. In April 2023, a 23-year-old woman went into an MRI with a silicone plug containing a metal core that was not known.

She thought that the item is made entirely out of silicone according to the advertising. However, the strong magnetic field of the MRI machine interacted with the hidden metal, dragging the object through her body and causing excruciating pain. According to reports from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the scene was harrowing, with the woman screaming in agony and requiring immediate hospitalization. Despite pre-scan screenings, which are routine prior to a scan, the patient did not inform the facility that the object existed because he presumed it was purely non-metallic. This caused serious injuries that led to the patient's law suit against the manufacturer for deceitful misrepresentations of material content.

MRI machines employ magnets between 0.5 to 3 Tesla (T). This is thousands of times stronger than the Earth's magnetic field. The tremendous force causes ferromagnetic materials, like iron and nickel, to be magnetized quickly and become strongly attracted toward the magnet. Objects as small as hairpins or paper clips will accelerate at 40 miles per hour inside the magnetic field.

The force can lead to catastrophic injuries in items lodged within the body, such as metallic implants or foreign objects. Metallic cores within devices, like pacemakers or intrauterine devices, must be disclosed to radiologists to prevent such complications.

How Metal Objects Interact with MRI Fields?

On these claims, Dr. Adam Taylor, a specialist in human anatomy, weighed his words in a international health website and added that the distance away and mass of this object would increase its velocity towards that of sound, "The acceleration would be phenomenal, but with a metallic core, it can't go anywhere near supersonic speeds. As for the size, the magnetic acceleration to the internal soft tissues would ensure that there could be severe intracranial trauma."

The injuries inflicted in this case likely involved damage to major blood vessels, nerves, or organs, highlighting the devastating impact of even minor oversight during an MRI scan.

This is not an isolated case. There are documented cases of metallic objects causing serious damage during MRI scans with a 65-year-old man with schizophrenia swallowed metal objects, including sockets and a hinge pin. The powerful magnetic field during an MRI scan caused the objects to rupture his stomach, resulting in serious injuries.

A toddler who ingested 11 small magnets perforated his bowel while undergoing a scan, making his case unique. In another deadly but extremely rare incident, there have been people who hide a firearm on themselves during MRI procedures. Magnetic attraction can trigger a discharge in a weapon and has led to some fatal injuries.

These cases emphasize the very strong need for adequate screening and patient education prior to an MRI.

Preventing MRI-Related Incidents

Medical professionals have been trained to avoid risks. This is by properly screening a patient for metallic objects. In general, most pre-scan protocols include:

• Patients are interrogated about implants, recent surgery or exposures at work related to metals.
• Radiologists sometimes use handheld metal detectors to search for hidden items.
• People who work with metal, like welders or machinists, will need additional testing to detect microscopic metal fragments within soft tissues or eyes.

The case emphasizes the importance of product labeling by manufacturers, especially those products that are likely to unintentionally cause harm to health. The patient's assumption that her device was 100% silicone points to a larger problem in consumer markets with misinformation.

It also reminds the patients to report any possible dangers to the medical professionals, no matter how the objects look non-metallic. In sensitive cases, patients can request private discussions with healthcare providers to ensure safety without discomfort.

In the end, it is a joint effort from manufacturers, healthcare professionals, and patients that can prevent such tragedies. Manufacturers must ensure truthful marketing, while healthcare providers should educate patients about the dangers of metal objects in MRI settings. For patients, understanding the risks and actively participating in pre-scan disclosures can be lifesaving.

This young woman's experience is a sobering example of the unforeseen dangers posed by MRI machines when precautions are overlooked. It serves as a wake-up call to address gaps in patient awareness, medical protocols, and product transparency. By learning from this incident, the medical community and the public can work together to ensure MRI scans remain a safe and effective diagnostic tool.

Amid a crackdown on manufacturers selling unsafe food products, the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has now turned its attention to food claims such as “immunity booster” and “nutrient-rich” endorsed by celebrities and social media influencers.

FSSAI Asks Influencers To Verify Food Claims

With millions of followers, celebrities and digital creators have become an increasingly popular channel for brands marketing health drinks, protein supplements, snacks and packaged foods.

“When you say ‘boosts immunity’, ‘rich in nutrients’, consumers trust you. Make sure every claim deserves that trust,” FSSAI said.

The food regulator asked influencers to verify that every claim made by a brand is:

• Truthful
• Scientifically substantiated
• Compliant with food safety regulations

FSSAI warned that misleading food advertisements and endorsements can have legal consequences.

Under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, and the Food Safety and Standards (Advertising and Claims) Regulations, 2018, misleading food advertisements and endorsements are prohibited and may attract legal action and penalties.

Also read: Why Indian Doctors Are Seeking A Ban On Junk Food Ads And Mandatory Warning Labels On Packaging?

FSSAI Steps Up Food Safety

In recent weeks, FSSAI has acted against or scrutinized products and companies over misleading claims, hygiene and food-safety violations, non-compliant ingredients, labelling issues and failure to meet prescribed standards.

The action has covered packaged foods, liquor, edible oils, sweeteners and high-caffeine beverages. The latest move involves tightening packaging rules for pan masala.

New Pan Masala Packaging Rules

Under the new Food Safety and Standards (Packaging) Amendment Regulations, 2026, notified on August 10, pan masala packaging can no longer use plastic-based materials, plastic laminates, aluminium foil or metallised layers.

Pan masala can now be packaged in materials made of paper, paperboard, cellulose and other naturally derived materials, provided they are completely free from plastic and synthetic polymers. Tin and glass containers are also allowed.

The decision follows an earlier draft notification issued by FSSAI in April, which proposed adding specific packaging materials for pan masala to the food packaging regulations.

Why Is FSSAI Targeting Pan Masala Packaging?

Read More: World Organ Donation Day 2026: Too Old Or Too Sick To Donate Organs? Doctors Bust Key Myths

Pan masala sachets have traditionally relied heavily on plastic and foil materials as they are lightweight, inexpensive and shield the contents from moisture.

However, such multilayer plastic packaging is difficult to recycle and contributes to persistent plastic waste. The new rules push manufacturers towards packaging made of paper and other naturally derived materials that will not harm the environment.

This does not mean that pan masala itself is safer to consume. Pan masala, particularly products containing tobacco or areca nut, continues to be harmful. The regulation is primarily about packaging standards and waste.

Taiwan’s Food and Drug Administration (TFDA) has recalled of 87,360 tablets of a blood pressure medication after a specific batch failed a quality test. Health officials raised concerns, saying that the drug may not work as effectively as expected.

The recall involves Beniel F.C. Tablets 8 mg, manufactured by Synmosa Biopharma Corp. The affected batch is 2KA31, and the medicine contains benidipine hydrochloride, a drug used to treat high blood pressure.

Why Has The Blood Pressure Medicine Been Recalled?

The problem was first identified during a stability test of the drug, which found that the tablets failed to meet the required dissolution standards.

In simple terms, a dissolution test is conducted to check how a tablet breaks down and releases its active ingredient under controlled conditions.

This is an important test as a tablet has to release the medicine in the proper way for the body to absorb it and for the drug to produce its intended effect.

Also read: Blood Pressure, Heart Medicines May Boost Effectiveness Of Antidepressants, AIIMS Study Finds

What Is Benidipine And How Does It Work?

Benidipine hydrochloride belongs to a group of drugs called calcium channel blockers. These medicines help lower blood pressure by relaxing and widening blood vessels. This enables the blood to flow more easily and reduces the pressure against artery walls.

That is why a problem affecting how a tablet dissolves can matter. If the active ingredient is not released into the body as expected, the medicine may not deliver its intended therapeutic effect.

Also read: Why Are More Women Under 35 Reporting Heart-Related Symptoms?

Is There A Risk Of Medicine Shortage?

According to the TFDA, there is no immediate concern of medication shortage. Other batches of Beniel F.C. Tablets 8 mg are not affected, and the manufacturer has sufficient inventory.

Production of the drug will also not been stopped. Taiwan News reported that two other products containing the same active ingredient are also authorised for sale.

The manufacturer has been ordered to complete the recall by August 24 and submit an investigation report along with corrective and preventive measures for future production.

Also read: Smoking, Diabetes, High Blood Pressure May Fuel the Most Dangerous Type of Artery Plaque, Study Finds

What Should Patients Taking Medicine From Recalled Batch Do?

Patients should not stop their blood pressure medication on their own. The TFDA advised people who are concerned about their prescription to speak with their doctor about whether an alternative medicine is necessary.

The recall highlights an often overlooked part of medication safety: a medicine can contain the correct active ingredient but still fail a quality test if its physical properties affect how the drug is released. For now, the concern is focused on one specific batch, rather than the entire Beniel F.C. product line.

The ongoing Ebola virus disease epidemic in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is moving faster than any previous outbreak, said WHO chief Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.

According to official data, confirmed cases have reached 4,449, with the death toll climbing to 2,061 across five provinces and 53 health zones in the country. However, the number of uncounted cases may be far higher than the reported figure.

“It is already the second-biggest Ebola epidemic on record, and it is moving faster than any previous Ebola outbreak. At its current pace, it is on track to eclipse the West African Ebola outbreak of 2014 to 2016,” Tedros said in a briefing.

The 2014-2016 outbreak reported at least 28,000 cases and took about eight months to reach 1,000 deaths.

Ebola 2026: Big Head Start, Likely to Peak in 6 Months

Tedros noted that the current “outbreak had a big head start, it is still way ahead of us, and we are playing catch-up.”

He said this even as reports showed that the disease caused by the rare Bundibugyo virus had been circulating since February and went undetected for months. The WHO declared the outbreak on May 15.

Dr Abdirahman Mahamud, WHO’s director for health emergency alert and response operations, said the agency expects the outbreak to reach its peak within six months, AP News reported.

“But ... that’s the moderate scenario,” Mahamud said. “There is a one-case scenario where this outbreak may last nine months to 12 months.”

Also read: Ebola Death Toll Tops 2,000 In DRC: New Study Reveals Likely Source Of Bundibugyo Virus Outbreak

Unknown Chains of Transmission

Tedros said about 90% of all cases and 80% of deaths are in the province of Ituri, with sustained transmission in the towns of Bunia, Rwampara, Nizi and Lita.

“Most concerningly, we see a high proportion of deaths in communities instead of treatment units, outside of known contact lists,” Tedros said.

“That tells us there are chains of transmission we don’t know about, and until we know about – and break – every chain of transmission, we will not stop the outbreak.”

Most transmission happens when people have late-stage disease and are not in treatment, or when their bodies are handled after death.

Early clinical care and safe and dignified burials are therefore critical for interrupting transmission. Both depend on the trust of affected communities, making community engagement and ownership essential.

“There is no other way,” Tedros said, adding that the response is now being scaled up, with the primary goal of interrupting transmission.

With partners, WHO is mapping and pooling resources to strengthen community-based surveillance, bring every suspected case into care and reach the 95% contact-tracing target needed to interrupt transmission. Currently, the rate is around 80%.

Read More: Ebola Outbreak: Officials To Probe Whether Bundibugyo Virus Is Mutating

Progress Made

• More than 21,000 community health workers have been trained.
• Treatment centres, safe burial teams, laboratories and community engagement teams are operating across the affected provinces, reaching hundreds of thousands of people.
• A total of 886 patients have recovered, even without specific therapeutics and vaccines, which are progressing through trials.
• For the first time, two vaccines specifically designed against Bundibugyo virus have entered Phase 1 safety trials in humans.
• Two new animal studies of a vaccine against Zaire ebolavirus — the more common species — have shown promising evidence of cross-protection in animals, Tedros said.