MRI scans are strong diagnostics with high-definition images of what lies inside a body. Strong magnetic fields require precaution, as brought out by an instance where a young woman suffered very serious injuries due to an oversight in a metallic core within a silicone sex toy that she happened to have before the MRI scan. This makes a stark reminder about the potentially deadly consequences of missing metal objects when such procedures are being performed. In April 2023, a 23-year-old woman went into an MRI with a silicone plug containing a metal core that was not known.

She thought that the item is made entirely out of silicone according to the advertising. However, the strong magnetic field of the MRI machine interacted with the hidden metal, dragging the object through her body and causing excruciating pain. According to reports from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the scene was harrowing, with the woman screaming in agony and requiring immediate hospitalization. Despite pre-scan screenings, which are routine prior to a scan, the patient did not inform the facility that the object existed because he presumed it was purely non-metallic. This caused serious injuries that led to the patient's law suit against the manufacturer for deceitful misrepresentations of material content.

MRI machines employ magnets between 0.5 to 3 Tesla (T). This is thousands of times stronger than the Earth's magnetic field. The tremendous force causes ferromagnetic materials, like iron and nickel, to be magnetized quickly and become strongly attracted toward the magnet. Objects as small as hairpins or paper clips will accelerate at 40 miles per hour inside the magnetic field.

The force can lead to catastrophic injuries in items lodged within the body, such as metallic implants or foreign objects. Metallic cores within devices, like pacemakers or intrauterine devices, must be disclosed to radiologists to prevent such complications.

How Metal Objects Interact with MRI Fields?

On these claims, Dr. Adam Taylor, a specialist in human anatomy, weighed his words in a international health website and added that the distance away and mass of this object would increase its velocity towards that of sound, "The acceleration would be phenomenal, but with a metallic core, it can't go anywhere near supersonic speeds. As for the size, the magnetic acceleration to the internal soft tissues would ensure that there could be severe intracranial trauma."

The injuries inflicted in this case likely involved damage to major blood vessels, nerves, or organs, highlighting the devastating impact of even minor oversight during an MRI scan.

This is not an isolated case. There are documented cases of metallic objects causing serious damage during MRI scans with a 65-year-old man with schizophrenia swallowed metal objects, including sockets and a hinge pin. The powerful magnetic field during an MRI scan caused the objects to rupture his stomach, resulting in serious injuries.

A toddler who ingested 11 small magnets perforated his bowel while undergoing a scan, making his case unique. In another deadly but extremely rare incident, there have been people who hide a firearm on themselves during MRI procedures. Magnetic attraction can trigger a discharge in a weapon and has led to some fatal injuries.

These cases emphasize the very strong need for adequate screening and patient education prior to an MRI.

Preventing MRI-Related Incidents

Medical professionals have been trained to avoid risks. This is by properly screening a patient for metallic objects. In general, most pre-scan protocols include:

• Patients are interrogated about implants, recent surgery or exposures at work related to metals.
• Radiologists sometimes use handheld metal detectors to search for hidden items.
• People who work with metal, like welders or machinists, will need additional testing to detect microscopic metal fragments within soft tissues or eyes.

The case emphasizes the importance of product labeling by manufacturers, especially those products that are likely to unintentionally cause harm to health. The patient's assumption that her device was 100% silicone points to a larger problem in consumer markets with misinformation.

It also reminds the patients to report any possible dangers to the medical professionals, no matter how the objects look non-metallic. In sensitive cases, patients can request private discussions with healthcare providers to ensure safety without discomfort.

In the end, it is a joint effort from manufacturers, healthcare professionals, and patients that can prevent such tragedies. Manufacturers must ensure truthful marketing, while healthcare providers should educate patients about the dangers of metal objects in MRI settings. For patients, understanding the risks and actively participating in pre-scan disclosures can be lifesaving.

This young woman's experience is a sobering example of the unforeseen dangers posed by MRI machines when precautions are overlooked. It serves as a wake-up call to address gaps in patient awareness, medical protocols, and product transparency. By learning from this incident, the medical community and the public can work together to ensure MRI scans remain a safe and effective diagnostic tool.

In another MAHA (Make America Healthy Again) meetings, Vice President JD Vance said that he thinks Ibuprofen, a common pain medication, is 'useless'. While speaking at the MAHA summit in Washington DC on November 12, along side the Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr, Vance talked about "the one way" he is "more instinctively MAHA".

He was here making a reference to Trump's administration's Make America Healthy Again. This is an initiative led by Kennedy.

This is when Vance said, "If I have like, you know, a back sprain, or I slept weird and I woke up with back pain, I don't want to take Ibuprofen." He said that he does not like taking medications. "I don't like taking anything unless I absolutely have to. And I think that is another MAHA style attitude. It is not anti-medication, it is anti-useless-medication," he said.

His remarks has made with many experts criticizing it. This is not the first time the MAHA flag bearers have faced criticism for their 'MAHA attitudes' and opinions. Earlier the connection between Tylenol, another popular pain medication and autism was also faced with criticism, with expert commenting on why the link is not correct.

In fact, Kennedy, who is leading the MAHA initiative has had a long history of being anti-vaccination and medication, which also includes refusing to promote the measles vaccines amid a measles surge. He also announced that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) would no longer recommend children and pregnant women get COVID vaccines, and the reason he cited was "common sense".

What Does Ibuprofen Do In Your Body?

Many widely used painkillers contain ibuprofen, a medication known for easing pain, reducing inflammation, and lowering fever. It works by blocking certain natural chemicals in the body that trigger swelling and discomfort.

When someone is injured or unwell, the body produces chemicals that heighten nerve sensitivity, making pain feel more intense. Painkillers help slow this process by reducing the production of these chemicals, preventing nerves from sending strong pain signals to the brain, ultimately helping the person feel relief.

Ibuprofen’s main role is to reduce inflammation and soothe pain. By limiting the chemicals that cause discomfort, it also decreases redness and heat in the affected area. This is why it is commonly recommended for muscle spasms and sprains, as noted in a 2015 study in the National Library of Medicine.

The medication also acts on the hypothalamus, the brain’s temperature-regulation center, helping to bring down fever. The same 2015 study suggests that some painkillers may suppress certain immune responses, which can worsen inflammation but make the brain perceive less pain, creating an overall calming effect.

Former world heavyweight champion Joseph Parker faces a potential ban from boxing after testing positive for cocaine, casting a shadow over his October 26 fight with Briton Fabio Wardley. As reported by BBC Sport, the 33-year-old New Zealander returned a positive result for a recreational drug, not a performance-enhancing substance. The sample was collected a day earlier by the Voluntary Anti-Doping Association (VADA).

His promoter, Queensberry Promotions, acknowledged the “adverse finding” but said no further comment would be made while the matter is being investigated. Parker’s UK manager Spencer Brown told Reuters they were “in total shock” and intend to get to the bottom of the development.

Parker could face a ban ranging from three months to two years, depending on circumstances. Although UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) and the British Boxing Board of Control will determine sanctions, UKAD did not administer the test and must conduct its own inquiry before issuing any decision.

The case comes amid broader debates on how recreational drug use should be penalized in elite sports. Sanctions have varied widely in recent years, from a four-year ban for boxer Liam Cameron in 2019 to a three-month ban for rugby league player Adam Rusling in 2024.

Parker, who held the heavyweight world title from 2016–2018, had hoped to work his way toward a fight with undisputed champion Oleksandr Usyk before his surprise loss to Wardley.

Why the Distinction Matters

Parker’s positive test for cocaine has reignited discussion around an important but often misunderstood issue: the difference between recreational drugs and performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs). While both categories are prohibited in competitive sport, their purpose, impact, and penalties differ significantly.

Recreational Drug Use in Sports

Recreational drug use reflects broader social trends. Studies in Western countries show that up to 38% of people have used an illicit drug at least once, with even higher rates among young adults. This behavior inevitably spills into sport, where athletes, like anyone else, may be exposed socially or recreationally.

The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) classifies prohibited substances into categories such as stimulants, narcotics, cannabinoids, beta-blockers, and more. Among athletes, the most commonly misused recreational substances include alcohol, cigarettes, and cannabis, particularly among adolescents and collegiate players.

Why Athletes Use Them

• Recreational use in sports can be driven by:
• Social environments
• Stress or pressure to perform
• Age segregation and peer dynamics
• Motivation to relax or cope

In some sports, especially high-contact ones, alcohol use has been shown to be more prevalent.

Testing and Consequences

Although these drugs do not enhance performance, they raise concerns about athlete safety, decision-making, and conduct. Penalties vary widely, as seen in recent cases: some athletes have received multi-year bans, while others served suspensions as short as three months.

Performance-Enhancing Drugs (PEDs)

PEDs are substances deliberately used to boost strength, stamina, speed, or recovery beyond natural limits. Their misuse is far more dangerous and directly threatens fair play.

Common PED categories include:

• Anabolic steroids
• Growth hormone and peptide hormones
• Erythropoietin (EPO)
• Stimulants
• Blood doping agents

These substances are often abused to gain a competitive edge, and their health consequences can be severe.

Risks and Health Damage

PEDs can cause:

• Hypertension, arrhythmias, stroke, heart attacks
• Liver toxicity
• Infertility, hormonal damage, genital changes
• Psychiatric effects such as aggression, depression, mania
• Addiction and withdrawal symptoms
• In extreme cases, death

Steroids are regulated as Schedule III substances, and many PEDs banned in sport are also restricted in general medicine. To ensure athletes can receive legitimate medical treatment, WADA allows Therapeutic Use Exemptions (TUEs) under strict criteria.

Actor Jarryd Nurden, a known name in theatre has finally made his return to the West End stage six months after his surgery that removed half of his lung due to a rare cancer.

Jarryd first thought he had nothing more than a stubborn winter bug. In late 2022, he came down with what felt like a “very bad flu,” pushing through fatigue and discomfort while performing in a Christmas pantomime. He assumed it was simply illness made worse by long rehearsals and a busy stage schedule. But the symptoms persisted, and further medical checks revealed something far more serious than a seasonal infection.

A Flu That Turned Out To Be A Lung Cancer

What Jarryd thought was flu turned out to be a rare form of lung cancer. The doctors re-examined the old medical scans, which had shown minor scarring, which was thought to be form a childhood drowning accident. This is when the doctors discovered a tumor had doubled in size, and it grew from two to four centimeters.

In January 2023, the same day he received news that he had secured a role in We Will Rock You, Jarryd attended an appointment at Guy’s Hospital, where doctors told him about the tumor. “When I had that phone call, that’s when my world crashed,” he told The Independent. “I was like: ‘I’m properly screwed.’”

The Diagnosis Of The Rare Lung Cancer

After months of tests and a keyhole surgery in August 2023 to examine the tumor, doctors confirmed it was primary malignant neuroendocrine neoplasm of the lung (atypical carcinoid), a rare form of lung cancer.

“That phone call I’ve always described as being underwater,” he said to The Independent. “Everything just slows down, and you’re like: ‘Oh, I have cancer’… I don’t drink, I don’t smoke… How’s this happening?”

Though the tumor was removed, some cancerous cells remained. Jarryd was given a choice: chemotherapy and radiotherapy, or a major operation to remove part of his lung. He chose surgery.

In October 2023, he underwent a completion lobectomy, removing the entire lower lobe of his left lung. The recovery was brutal. “Recovery was really hard… I think it was touch and go at one point,” he shared with The Independent. Complications meant four months in hospital, a second open surgery due to infections, and enduring the most intense pain he had ever felt.

Despite the hardship, the Actors’ Trust helped support him financially while he was unable to work. He underwent additional treatment in July 2024 to insert stents into a chest fistula and continued healing.

Way Back To The Stage

Against all odds, just three months after his last surgery, Jarryd accepted an offer to join the international tour of Chicago, covering the role of Mary Sunshine. He rehearsed for one day in London, flew to China, had a two-hour rehearsal, and stepped onstage.

“It was do or die… The challenge was intense,” he told The Independent. Taking his bow afterward was overwhelming. “It was immense gratitude… for being back on stage… being with such a supportive company.”

He added, “I think when you go through something very life-changing, you stop sweating the small stuff… You do have that second chance at life, essentially.”