MRI scans are strong diagnostics with high-definition images of what lies inside a body. Strong magnetic fields require precaution, as brought out by an instance where a young woman suffered very serious injuries due to an oversight in a metallic core within a silicone sex toy that she happened to have before the MRI scan. This makes a stark reminder about the potentially deadly consequences of missing metal objects when such procedures are being performed. In April 2023, a 23-year-old woman went into an MRI with a silicone plug containing a metal core that was not known.

She thought that the item is made entirely out of silicone according to the advertising. However, the strong magnetic field of the MRI machine interacted with the hidden metal, dragging the object through her body and causing excruciating pain. According to reports from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the scene was harrowing, with the woman screaming in agony and requiring immediate hospitalization. Despite pre-scan screenings, which are routine prior to a scan, the patient did not inform the facility that the object existed because he presumed it was purely non-metallic. This caused serious injuries that led to the patient's law suit against the manufacturer for deceitful misrepresentations of material content.

MRI machines employ magnets between 0.5 to 3 Tesla (T). This is thousands of times stronger than the Earth's magnetic field. The tremendous force causes ferromagnetic materials, like iron and nickel, to be magnetized quickly and become strongly attracted toward the magnet. Objects as small as hairpins or paper clips will accelerate at 40 miles per hour inside the magnetic field.

The force can lead to catastrophic injuries in items lodged within the body, such as metallic implants or foreign objects. Metallic cores within devices, like pacemakers or intrauterine devices, must be disclosed to radiologists to prevent such complications.

How Metal Objects Interact with MRI Fields?

On these claims, Dr. Adam Taylor, a specialist in human anatomy, weighed his words in a international health website and added that the distance away and mass of this object would increase its velocity towards that of sound, "The acceleration would be phenomenal, but with a metallic core, it can't go anywhere near supersonic speeds. As for the size, the magnetic acceleration to the internal soft tissues would ensure that there could be severe intracranial trauma."

The injuries inflicted in this case likely involved damage to major blood vessels, nerves, or organs, highlighting the devastating impact of even minor oversight during an MRI scan.

This is not an isolated case. There are documented cases of metallic objects causing serious damage during MRI scans with a 65-year-old man with schizophrenia swallowed metal objects, including sockets and a hinge pin. The powerful magnetic field during an MRI scan caused the objects to rupture his stomach, resulting in serious injuries.

A toddler who ingested 11 small magnets perforated his bowel while undergoing a scan, making his case unique. In another deadly but extremely rare incident, there have been people who hide a firearm on themselves during MRI procedures. Magnetic attraction can trigger a discharge in a weapon and has led to some fatal injuries.

These cases emphasize the very strong need for adequate screening and patient education prior to an MRI.

Preventing MRI-Related Incidents

Medical professionals have been trained to avoid risks. This is by properly screening a patient for metallic objects. In general, most pre-scan protocols include:

• Patients are interrogated about implants, recent surgery or exposures at work related to metals.
• Radiologists sometimes use handheld metal detectors to search for hidden items.
• People who work with metal, like welders or machinists, will need additional testing to detect microscopic metal fragments within soft tissues or eyes.

The case emphasizes the importance of product labeling by manufacturers, especially those products that are likely to unintentionally cause harm to health. The patient's assumption that her device was 100% silicone points to a larger problem in consumer markets with misinformation.

It also reminds the patients to report any possible dangers to the medical professionals, no matter how the objects look non-metallic. In sensitive cases, patients can request private discussions with healthcare providers to ensure safety without discomfort.

In the end, it is a joint effort from manufacturers, healthcare professionals, and patients that can prevent such tragedies. Manufacturers must ensure truthful marketing, while healthcare providers should educate patients about the dangers of metal objects in MRI settings. For patients, understanding the risks and actively participating in pre-scan disclosures can be lifesaving.

This young woman's experience is a sobering example of the unforeseen dangers posed by MRI machines when precautions are overlooked. It serves as a wake-up call to address gaps in patient awareness, medical protocols, and product transparency. By learning from this incident, the medical community and the public can work together to ensure MRI scans remain a safe and effective diagnostic tool.

Japanese researchers have developed a new form of wearable health technology that could reshape how illness is detected. The innovation takes the form of a “living skin” implant that emits a green glow when the body begins to show early signs of disease. Designed to sit within the skin, the implant offers a visible warning when internal health markers shift, potentially alerting users before symptoms become obvious.

How The Glowing Implant Works

The implant works by monitoring internal biomarkers, which are proteins linked to inflammation, stress, and disease processes. When these biomarkers move outside their normal range, the implant responds by glowing green. Rather than depending on a smartwatch or fitness tracker, this approach would allow people to see changes in their health directly on their skin, offering continuous feedback throughout the day and night.

The project was developed by scientists from Tokyo City University and the University of Tokyo, with technical support from engineers at RIKEN and Canon Medical Systems. The team has already tested the concept in mice, where the implant functioned as a living sensor display embedded in the skin.

Why Researchers Sought a New Approach

The research was also featured in the Daily Star as part of The Weird Science Drop newsletter, which highlighted a range of unusual scientific developments alongside this project.

No Batteries, No Replacements

One of the most striking aspects of the implant is what it does not need. The sensor is made from living epidermal stem cells, allowing it to survive through the skin’s natural regeneration process. Because it is maintained by the body itself, the implant does not require batteries or external power sources, as per Express UK.

Professor Fujita noted that this makes the technology fundamentally different from traditional devices. “Unlike conventional devices that require power sources or periodic replacement, this system is biologically maintained by the body itself,” he said. In laboratory experiments, the sensor remained functional for more than 200 days, with the engineered stem cells continuously renewing the skin while keeping the implant active.

Potential Uses Beyond Human Health

As per Express UK, while the technology is still being tested, the researchers believe its applications could extend well beyond human healthcare. They suggest it may be especially useful in animal research and veterinary medicine. Since animals cannot describe how they feel, a visible signal on the skin could help detect illness earlier and allow for faster intervention.

Although the implant is not yet ready for everyday use, it offers a glimpse into a future where health monitoring becomes part of the body itself, quietly working in the background and providing clear visual cues when something is not right.

Specialty chocolate bars are being removed from store shelves after concerns were raised about possible salmonella contamination, the US Food and Drug Administration said on January 12. Spring & Mulberry has announced a voluntary recall of its Mint Leaf Date-Sweetened Chocolate Bar, which has been sold online and at selected retail locations across the country since September, the FDA confirmed.

The issue was flagged during routine testing carried out by an independent laboratory. So far, no illnesses or negative health effects linked to the product have been reported.

As per The Independent, consumers who purchased the recalled chocolate are being advised to throw it away and seek a refund from Spring & Mulberry. The company has asked customers to contact them directly and provide a photograph of the chocolate bar showing the affected lot code.

Chocolate Bars Sold Across The US Recalled Over Salmonella Concerns

A well-known chocolate brand has issued a recall after possible salmonella contamination was detected. Spring & Mulberry, a Raleigh, North Carolina-based company, voluntarily recalled its Mint Leaf Date-Sweetened Chocolate Bar following routine third-party testing that found traces of salmonella, according to an FDA notice released Monday.

The recalled bars have been sold online and through selected retail partners since September 15, 2025. Consumers can identify the affected product by its teal-colored packaging and the lot code 025255 printed on the back of the box and the inner wrapper.

What Is Salmonella?

• Bloody diarrhea or diarrhea that lasts more than three days without improvement
• Diarrhea accompanied by a fever above 102 degrees
• Severe vomiting that makes it difficult to keep fluids down
• Signs of dehydration such as dry mouth, reduced urination, and dizziness when standing
• Abdominal cramps

Symptoms usually appear between six hours and six days after exposure. While most people recover within four to seven days, those at higher risk, including children under 5 and adults over 65, may develop more severe illness that requires medical care or hospitalization.

Affected Lot Code For Recalled Chocolates

The recalled Spring & Mulberry chocolate carries the lot code #025255. This code applies specifically to the Mint Leaf Date-Sweetened Chocolate Bar that has been pulled from the market due to the potential risk of salmonella contamination identified during routine lab testing.

Shoppers are urged to check their packaging carefully for the listed lot code. Anyone who has a bar with the affected code should not eat it. Instead, they should discard the product and contact Spring & Mulberry to request a refund.

As per USA TODAY, although no illnesses have been reported so far, the recall has been issued as a precaution to safeguard public health, especially for vulnerable groups such as children, older adults, and people with compromised immune systems. The FDA has shared further guidance on recall steps and salmonella symptoms.

The chocolate recall follows another FDA action just months earlier involving Doughy Chocolate Chip Cookie Dough produced by Hudson River Foods in November, also due to possible salmonella contamination. That recall was later upgraded to a Class I recall on December 5 after officials determined that consuming the product could result in serious health effects or death.

A total of 113 units of the edible cookie dough were included in that recall. The affected products were sold in 12-ounce containers and carried a best-by date of July 4, 2026.

The UK’s drug regulator has cleared a higher-strength dose of the weight-loss injection Wegovy, as demand for the treatment is expected to rise sharply. The newly approved 7.2 mg dose is three times stronger than the current weekly dose of 2.4 mg. The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, or MHRA, said the stronger dose can lead to weight loss of more than 20 per cent. Trial data reviewed by the regulator showed that around one in three adults living with obesity who took the higher weekly dose lost more than 25 per cent of their body weight after 72 weeks.

Weight Loss Jab To Launch Stronger Dosage In UK

The approval comes alongside research from the University of Oxford suggesting that people using drugs such as semaglutide, sold as Wegovy, and tirzepatide, marketed as Mounjaro, tend to lose weight while on treatment but regain it within about 20 months after stopping the injections. According to The Independent, people who lose weight through diet and exercise tend to maintain the loss for longer, close to four years on average, although some regain still occurs over time.

Researchers cautioned that people using weight-loss injections need long-term support, as their analysis showed weight returns more quickly after stopping the drugs than it does for those following traditional diet plans. The study also found that improvements in blood sugar, cholesterol levels, and blood pressure fade once the medication is discontinued, leaving many patients back where they started. The Oxford-led research, published in the British Medical Journal, reviewed 37 studies involving more than 9,000 participants.

What Is Wegovy?

Wegovy is a widely used weight-loss injection containing the active ingredient semaglutide. Studies show that people on the standard maintenance dose of 2.4 mg lose an average of 17 per cent of their body weight over 68 weeks. A higher 7.2 mg dose has now been approved for use in the UK, with clinical trials indicating it can deliver weight loss of up to 21 per cent.

What is Wegovy 7.2mg?

Wegovy 7.2 mg is a new maintenance dose of the semaglutide-based weight-loss injection. Until now, the highest approved weekly dose was 2.4 mg. The stronger 7.2 mg option is being introduced by the drug’s manufacturer, Novo Nordisk, following its submission to regulators for approval.

This new dose uses the same active ingredient, semaglutide, and works in the same way by helping overweight or obese adults lose weight. It does this by copying the action of the hormone glucagon-like peptide-1, or GLP-1, which helps regulate appetite and food intake.

Further studies examining the safety and effectiveness of the higher dose are already in progress. The latest findings from the STEP UP phase 3b trial were published in November 2025.

How Effective Is The Wegovy 7.2 Dose?

The STEP UP phase 3b trial assessed how safe and effective the 7.2 mg dose of Wegovy is. The study included 1,407 participants who were randomly assigned to receive either 7.2 mg or 2.4 mg of Wegovy, or a placebo, over an 11-month period.

The average weight loss recorded was:

• 20.7 per cent in the 7.2 mg group
• 17.5 per cent in the 2.4 mg group
• 2.4 per cent among those given a placebo

The approval follows recent findings showing that about 1.6 million people used Wegovy or Mounjaro last year. Another 3.3 million people said they would consider using weight-loss medications in the coming year.

According to The Independent, research by University College London based on a survey of 5,260 people found that 2.9 per cent of respondents were using GLP-1 drugs for weight loss. Of those, 15 per cent were taking medication that is not licensed for that purpose. Researchers warned that using drugs off label, meaning for conditions they are not approved to treat, such as using diabetes drugs for weight loss, can carry safety risks if taken without proper medical supervision.