MRI scans are strong diagnostics with high-definition images of what lies inside a body. Strong magnetic fields require precaution, as brought out by an instance where a young woman suffered very serious injuries due to an oversight in a metallic core within a silicone sex toy that she happened to have before the MRI scan. This makes a stark reminder about the potentially deadly consequences of missing metal objects when such procedures are being performed. In April 2023, a 23-year-old woman went into an MRI with a silicone plug containing a metal core that was not known.
She thought that the item is made entirely out of silicone according to the advertising. However, the strong magnetic field of the MRI machine interacted with the hidden metal, dragging the object through her body and causing excruciating pain. According to reports from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the scene was harrowing, with the woman screaming in agony and requiring immediate hospitalization. Despite pre-scan screenings, which are routine prior to a scan, the patient did not inform the facility that the object existed because he presumed it was purely non-metallic. This caused serious injuries that led to the patient's law suit against the manufacturer for deceitful misrepresentations of material content.
MRI machines employ magnets between 0.5 to 3 Tesla (T). This is thousands of times stronger than the Earth's magnetic field. The tremendous force causes ferromagnetic materials, like iron and nickel, to be magnetized quickly and become strongly attracted toward the magnet. Objects as small as hairpins or paper clips will accelerate at 40 miles per hour inside the magnetic field.
The force can lead to catastrophic injuries in items lodged within the body, such as metallic implants or foreign objects. Metallic cores within devices, like pacemakers or intrauterine devices, must be disclosed to radiologists to prevent such complications.
On these claims, Dr. Adam Taylor, a specialist in human anatomy, weighed his words in a international health website and added that the distance away and mass of this object would increase its velocity towards that of sound, "The acceleration would be phenomenal, but with a metallic core, it can't go anywhere near supersonic speeds. As for the size, the magnetic acceleration to the internal soft tissues would ensure that there could be severe intracranial trauma."
The injuries inflicted in this case likely involved damage to major blood vessels, nerves, or organs, highlighting the devastating impact of even minor oversight during an MRI scan.
This is not an isolated case. There are documented cases of metallic objects causing serious damage during MRI scans with a 65-year-old man with schizophrenia swallowed metal objects, including sockets and a hinge pin. The powerful magnetic field during an MRI scan caused the objects to rupture his stomach, resulting in serious injuries.
A toddler who ingested 11 small magnets perforated his bowel while undergoing a scan, making his case unique. In another deadly but extremely rare incident, there have been people who hide a firearm on themselves during MRI procedures. Magnetic attraction can trigger a discharge in a weapon and has led to some fatal injuries.
These cases emphasize the very strong need for adequate screening and patient education prior to an MRI.
Medical professionals have been trained to avoid risks. This is by properly screening a patient for metallic objects. In general, most pre-scan protocols include:
The case emphasizes the importance of product labeling by manufacturers, especially those products that are likely to unintentionally cause harm to health. The patient's assumption that her device was 100% silicone points to a larger problem in consumer markets with misinformation.
It also reminds the patients to report any possible dangers to the medical professionals, no matter how the objects look non-metallic. In sensitive cases, patients can request private discussions with healthcare providers to ensure safety without discomfort.
In the end, it is a joint effort from manufacturers, healthcare professionals, and patients that can prevent such tragedies. Manufacturers must ensure truthful marketing, while healthcare providers should educate patients about the dangers of metal objects in MRI settings. For patients, understanding the risks and actively participating in pre-scan disclosures can be lifesaving.
This young woman's experience is a sobering example of the unforeseen dangers posed by MRI machines when precautions are overlooked. It serves as a wake-up call to address gaps in patient awareness, medical protocols, and product transparency. By learning from this incident, the medical community and the public can work together to ensure MRI scans remain a safe and effective diagnostic tool.
Credit: PIB
In yet another milestone in India’s digital healthcare, the government has launched the Swasth Bharat Portal, which aims to bring together the fragmented health systems in the country.
The portal, unveiled during the recent 10th National Summit on Innovation and Inclusivity by Union Minister for Health and Family Welfare JP Nadda, signifies a decisive shift towards a more integrated, efficient, and scalable digital public health architecture.
The portal aims to enable seamless integration with the Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission (ABDM) and support the exchange of patient records through the ABHA health account system.
The Swasth Bharat Portal has been conceptualized as an aggregator platform that integrates existing program systems through an API-based federated architecture.
It enables interoperability and convergence, creating a unified digital layer across programs.
It is a one-stop integrated platform that brings multiple national health programs onto a single interface.
It eliminates the need for multiple logins and repetitive data entry, and significantly reduces the administrative burden on healthcare providers while enhancing efficiency at all levels.
The portal also provides a single platform for easy access, along with data visualisation tools and the use of data at the local level for monitoring and evidence-based planning.
It is ABDM-compliant and supports integration with ABHA (Ayushman Bharat Health Account), enabling seamless and secure exchange of patient health records.
It is designed to evolve into a comprehensive and interoperable digital health ecosystem, further integrating with national registries such as the Healthcare Professionals Registry (HPR) and Health Facility Registry (HFR).
The new portal will help:
Read More: Medical Miracle: World First Frozen Testicular Implant Gives ‘Infertile’ UK Man Hope of Fatherhood
The Swasth Bharat portal will also lead to substantial government savings both in terms of human resources, time, and IT infrastructure as compared to the current individual portals being managed by different program divisions, the Health Ministry said.
Further, the portal enables a shift towards an integrated, efficient, and scalable digital public infrastructure with significant efficiency gains.
The Swasth Bharat Portal thus represents a transformative step towards convergence, efficiency, and data-driven governance in India’s public health system.
Researchers have just found that eggs should be eaten every day for lowering Alzheimer's disease risk. (Photo credit: AI generated)
Eggs are literally one of the healthiest foods on the planet. They offer proteins, healthy fats, vitamin D, choline, and other essential vitamins and minerals. Therefore, it is a no-brainer that eating eggs is associated with several health benefits—from weight management to a healthier heart to even diabetes management. And now, according to researchers at the Loma Linda University School of Public Health, eating eggs is associated with a lower risk of Alzheimer's disease as well. Alzheimer's is often diagnosed in people aged 65 years and above. Researchers have found that eating one egg a day for at least five days can reduce Alzheimer's risk by 27 per cent.
Also Read: Donald Trump’s Health Under Spotlight After ‘Squirrel’ Remark Sparks Cognitive Debate
Experts at the Loma Linda University School of Public Health found that, as compared to people who never eat eggs, eating at least five servings of the high-protein food option can significantly reduce Alzheimer's risk. Furthermore, the study also noted that less frequent consumption of eggs can work wonders in helping to dodge memory loss and other cognitive health-related symptoms. Researchers in the study found that eating eggs one to three times a month can reduce the risk by 17 per cent, and eating two to four times a week reduced the risk by 20 per cent. The study was published in the Journal of Nutrition.
Eggs are a whole food, and that is because of the nutrients they offer and their subsequent benefits for overall health. They are also sources of essential nutrients that improve brain health—they offer choline, phosphatidylcholine, and acetylcholine—all of which are critical for synaptic function and memory. They are also sources of zeaxanthin and lutein, carotenoids that accumulate in brain tissues and are linked to lower oxidative stress and better cognitive performance. Eggs are sources of omega-3 fatty acids and phospholipids that constitute 30 per cent of the total egg lipids essential for neurotransmitter receptor function.
Also Read: Donald Trump’s Weekend Dental Appointment Triggers Fresh Health Concerns
Researchers in the study said that their aim was to understand the relationship between modifiable dietary factors linked to Alzheimer's disease risk. Experts stated that they studied egg consumption in visible ways, for instance, eating them fried, scrambled, or boiled, or in hidden ways such as packaged or baked goods. Scientists emphasised that moderate intake of eggs is an important part of a balanced diet. Whether for breakfast, as a post-workout meal, or simply as a snack satisfying cravings, this versatile food option must find its way into your diet. And after years of research and studies (with more to come), it can be said that eggs are key to a healthy life now and even years later.
Credit: Reuters
Officials at the US Food and Drug Administration have blocked publication of several studies supporting the safety of widely used vaccines against COVID-19 and shingles in recent months, according to a spokesman for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
While the studies found serious side effects to be very rare, the HHS said they were pulled over concerns about their conclusions. These withdrawals aim to limit access to vaccines, reflecting broader policy changes under US Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a staunch critic of vaccines.
"The studies were withdrawn because the authors drew broad conclusions that were not supported by the underlying data. The FDA acted to protect the integrity of its scientific process and ensure that any work associated with the agency meets its high standards," said Andrew Nixon, a spokesman for the HHS, which oversees the FDA, in an email to Reuters.
The last one year of Trump administration, along with Kennedy as the head of the HHS, saw significant cut in research funding for vaccine development. It also fueled doubt on vaccines, and blocked other information supporting their safety.
The list includes research on COVID vaccine effectiveness by scientists from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
In October, the scientists were directed to withdraw two COVID vaccine studies that had been accepted for publication in medical journals. Further, in February, top FDA officials did not sign off on submitting abstracts about studies of Shingrix, a shingles vaccine, to a major drug safety conference.
“The design of that study fell outside the agency’s purview,” Nixon said on rejecting the shingles vaccine. He did not address a question about the Shingrix safety study, which found the vaccine to be safe.
Also read: Donald Trump’s 'Squirrel' Remark Fuels Debate Over Brain Health And Cognitive Tests
In June 2025, his office asked CDC staff members to delete from the agency’s website a 17-page summary supporting the safety of thimerosal, an additive largely removed from vaccines 25 years ago.
Further, in August, Kennedy called the journal Annals of Internal Medicine to “immediately retract” a large Danish study concluding that the vaccine additive aluminum salts were safe. However, the study was not retracted.
Recently, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, who was serving as interim leader of the CDC, canceled the publication of a report concluding that the Covid vaccine sharply cut the odds of hospitalizations and emergency room visits last winter, saying the study had limitations.
“At a moment when public trust in institutions like the CDC is fragile, we cannot afford to lower our standards,” Dr. Bhattacharya wrote in an editorial about news coverage of his decision.
Read More: Medical Miracle: World First Frozen Testicular Implant Gives ‘Infertile’ UK Man Hope of Fatherhood
Last June, a CDC panel backed by Kennedy voted to remove the mercury-based preservative thimerosal from flu shots, despite long-standing clinical evidence of its safety.
In August 2025, the HHS said it would wind down nearly $500 million in mRNA vaccine development, canceling 22 federal projects overseen by the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), a government-backed funding body.
Other vaccines, including flu and hepatitis A, were also removed from routine recommendations. He also directed the CDC to stop recommending the vaccine for healthy pregnant women and children.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited