MRI scans are strong diagnostics with high-definition images of what lies inside a body. Strong magnetic fields require precaution, as brought out by an instance where a young woman suffered very serious injuries due to an oversight in a metallic core within a silicone sex toy that she happened to have before the MRI scan. This makes a stark reminder about the potentially deadly consequences of missing metal objects when such procedures are being performed. In April 2023, a 23-year-old woman went into an MRI with a silicone plug containing a metal core that was not known.
She thought that the item is made entirely out of silicone according to the advertising. However, the strong magnetic field of the MRI machine interacted with the hidden metal, dragging the object through her body and causing excruciating pain. According to reports from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the scene was harrowing, with the woman screaming in agony and requiring immediate hospitalization. Despite pre-scan screenings, which are routine prior to a scan, the patient did not inform the facility that the object existed because he presumed it was purely non-metallic. This caused serious injuries that led to the patient's law suit against the manufacturer for deceitful misrepresentations of material content.
MRI machines employ magnets between 0.5 to 3 Tesla (T). This is thousands of times stronger than the Earth's magnetic field. The tremendous force causes ferromagnetic materials, like iron and nickel, to be magnetized quickly and become strongly attracted toward the magnet. Objects as small as hairpins or paper clips will accelerate at 40 miles per hour inside the magnetic field.
The force can lead to catastrophic injuries in items lodged within the body, such as metallic implants or foreign objects. Metallic cores within devices, like pacemakers or intrauterine devices, must be disclosed to radiologists to prevent such complications.
On these claims, Dr. Adam Taylor, a specialist in human anatomy, weighed his words in a international health website and added that the distance away and mass of this object would increase its velocity towards that of sound, "The acceleration would be phenomenal, but with a metallic core, it can't go anywhere near supersonic speeds. As for the size, the magnetic acceleration to the internal soft tissues would ensure that there could be severe intracranial trauma."
The injuries inflicted in this case likely involved damage to major blood vessels, nerves, or organs, highlighting the devastating impact of even minor oversight during an MRI scan.
This is not an isolated case. There are documented cases of metallic objects causing serious damage during MRI scans with a 65-year-old man with schizophrenia swallowed metal objects, including sockets and a hinge pin. The powerful magnetic field during an MRI scan caused the objects to rupture his stomach, resulting in serious injuries.
A toddler who ingested 11 small magnets perforated his bowel while undergoing a scan, making his case unique. In another deadly but extremely rare incident, there have been people who hide a firearm on themselves during MRI procedures. Magnetic attraction can trigger a discharge in a weapon and has led to some fatal injuries.
These cases emphasize the very strong need for adequate screening and patient education prior to an MRI.
Medical professionals have been trained to avoid risks. This is by properly screening a patient for metallic objects. In general, most pre-scan protocols include:
The case emphasizes the importance of product labeling by manufacturers, especially those products that are likely to unintentionally cause harm to health. The patient's assumption that her device was 100% silicone points to a larger problem in consumer markets with misinformation.
It also reminds the patients to report any possible dangers to the medical professionals, no matter how the objects look non-metallic. In sensitive cases, patients can request private discussions with healthcare providers to ensure safety without discomfort.
In the end, it is a joint effort from manufacturers, healthcare professionals, and patients that can prevent such tragedies. Manufacturers must ensure truthful marketing, while healthcare providers should educate patients about the dangers of metal objects in MRI settings. For patients, understanding the risks and actively participating in pre-scan disclosures can be lifesaving.
This young woman's experience is a sobering example of the unforeseen dangers posed by MRI machines when precautions are overlooked. It serves as a wake-up call to address gaps in patient awareness, medical protocols, and product transparency. By learning from this incident, the medical community and the public can work together to ensure MRI scans remain a safe and effective diagnostic tool.
Credit: iStock
July 2026 was the hottest month in the US in more than a century of official temperature records, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
The Lower 48 states recorded an average temperature of 76.89°F (24.94°C) — 3.3°F (1.8°C) above the 20th-century average — narrowly surpassing the previous July record set in 1936, when severe drought and extreme heat devastated large parts of the country.
The record followed weeks of intense heatwaves, prolonged extreme temperatures and widespread wildfires.
Daytime maximum temperatures averaged 89.5°F, making July the sixth-warmest month on record for daytime temperatures.
Overnight temperatures averaged 64.2°F, the highest recorded in any month and 3.7°F above the average. They were also 0.7°F hotter than July 2022.
Scientists attributed the record heat to climate change. A Climate Central analysis using data from 1970 to 2024 found that climate change has contributed to hotter summer nights and made extreme heat more frequent, longer-lasting and intense.
“Much-above-average” temperatures were recorded across the interior of West, Southwest, Rockies, northern Plains, upper Midwest and parts of the Gulf Coast and Southeast.
Thirteen states had one of their five warmest Julys. Wyoming recorded its hottest month on record, 0.9°F above its previous record.
Alaska was 0.9°F cooler than its 1925–2000 average, while Hawaii was 0.6°F warmer than its 1991–2020 average.
High temperatures coincided with below-average precipitation across several regions, including the northern Rockies, northern Plains, upper Midwest, Northeast, southern Plains, Mississippi Valley, central Gulf Coast and Southeast.
About 48.5% of the mainland US and Washington, DC, were in drought as of Tuesday, according to the US Drought Monitor. More than two-thirds of Puerto Rico were also in drought.
Wildfire smoke blanketed parts of the US as major fires burned across Canada and the Pacific Northwest.
The UK and France are bracing for the fifth heat wave of the season, following repeated bouts of extreme heat across Europe since May.
France’s Météo-France is warning of temperatures approaching 40°C (104°F) in southeastern France from Tuesday.
In the UK, an amber heat-health alert for most of England will begin Tuesday, with temperatures forecast to reach 36°C (96.8°F) later this week.
Extreme heat has been linked to more than 25,000 deaths across Europe in 2026, while at least 70 deaths have been directly linked to major July heat domes in the US.
Credit: UCSF
Drug-resistant superbug Candida auris (C. auris) has now been detected in 27 US states. According to the latest data from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 3,437 clinical cases have been reported through July 25.
The figure is about 1,000 fewer than the 4,290 cases reported during the same period last year.
C. auris is a deadly fungus that primarily poses a concern for people who are hospitalised or in long-term care facilities. The total number of clinical cases has increased since the pathogen was first detected in the US in 2016, the CDC said.
While the rate of increase has slowed in recent years, C. auris remains a “critical public health threat.”
First discovered in Japan in 2009, the pathogen can live silently on the skin but can become deadly when it reaches the bloodstream. It kills about 3,000 patients in US hospitals and long-term care facilities each year.
Now, a new study published in the journal Science has revealed why the deadly superbug can be so difficult to remove from the skin once it takes hold.
Researchers at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) found that C. auris actively rewires the skin’s immune system to protect itself, taking refuge in hair follicles where current therapies cannot reach it.
“Candida auris colonizes skin way better than most other fungi, setting it up to invade once the immune system is weakened,” said Dean Merrill, a dermatologist, UCSF professor and first author of the study.
“The big clinical problem is that we have no effective way to remove it from the skin,” he added.
To understand why C. auris persists on the skin unlike other fungi, researchers compared it with Candida albicans, a common fungus that the skin and immune system normally clear quickly.
In mice, C. auris was found to persist by taking refuge in hair follicles.
While C. albicans activated an immune signal called IL-17, which helps renew the skin’s surface and strengthen antifungal defenses, allowing the infection to be cleared, C. auris, triggered interferon gamma, a signal more commonly associated with viral infections.
The fungus achieved this by remodeling its outer cell wall to expose more of a molecule called chitin. This prompted immune cells to release interferon gamma around the hair follicle.
The interferon gamma then blocked the skin’s antifungal defenses, including IL-17. It also slowed the natural replacement of cells in the hair follicle, causing older, damaged cells to accumulate and creating a niche where C. auris could flourish.
The findings reveal potential targets for preventing C. auris from persisting on the skin.
One possible approach could involve drugs that shift the immune response away from interferon gamma and toward IL-17, which drives the skin’s normal antifungal clearing process.
Another possibility could be drugs that block chitin, potentially preventing the fungus from amplifying interferon gamma signals, Merrill said.
More broadly, the researchers say the findings offer a new way of understanding how microbes can quietly coexist with humans before becoming dangerous.
Credit: AI
The Democratic Republic of Congo’s (DRC) Ebola outbreak may have been spreading for months before health authorities officially declared it, raising new questions about why the early warning signs were missed.
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), genetic sequencing indicates that the current outbreak began as early as February 2026, while the DRC officially declared the outbreak on May 15. By then, the virus had already had time to spread through communities in eastern DRC.
The outbreak is being caused by the Bundibugyo virus, a rare Ebola species for which there is currently no approved vaccine or specific course of treatment.
One of the major reasons why the current Ebola outbreak expanded within a short period of time was that it not immediately recognised.
Some early patients were reportedly treated for malaria or typhoid, illnesses that can initially cause symptoms such as fever, weakness, vomiting and diarrhoea. Early testing also focused on the more common Zaire strain of Ebola, delaying recognition of Bundibugyo virus.
WHO’s own assessment had already identified an unusual cluster of severe illness and deaths in the Mongbwalu health zone in Ituri Province by early May. A subsequent investigation covering April 15 to May 13 identified 246 suspected cases and 65 deaths across three health zones.
Geographical disadvantage was also one of the reasons. Ituri is affected by armed conflict, population displacement and poor road access. Health workers have faced shortages of protective equipment, while some facilities have struggled because of workers' strikes.
Also read: Nova Scotia's Ebola Trial: Why Is Canada Testing A Vaccine When It Has No Outbreak?
The Ebola outbreak in DRC continues to grow at a rapid pace. The latest government figures cited by WHO and international media show about 4,200 confirmed Ebola cases and at least 1,900 deaths in DRC.
WHO Regional Director for Africa Mohamed Janabi described the situation bluntly: “We are chasing the virus, the virus is ahead of us.”
WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has also warned that the outbreak is moving faster than the response, with cases doubling in some hotspots. He wrote on on X that “the outbreak is spreading faster than our scale up of the response”, adding that new cases had doubled in some hotspots over the previous week.
Ebola becomes considerably harder to contain once transmission moves beyond identifiable limits. Unlike respiratory viruses, Ebola primarily spreads through contact with infected bodily fluids and contaminated materials. But when patients are not recognised early, they can unknowingly expose others, healthcare workers and caregivers.
Also read: FDA Approves Moderna's First mRNA Flu Vaccine, Marking A Milestone In Influenza Prevention
One of the major challenges in this outbreak is that around 60–70% of new cases are reportedly occurring outside known contact chains, making traditional contact tracing much harder. The current outbreak has also unfolded in crowded urban and displacement settings, rather than remaining confined to an isolated rural location.
The 2014–2016 West African Ebola epidemic was officially declared in March 2014, although the first human case was later traced back to December 2013. That outbreak eventually led to more than 11,000 deaths.
The WHO is now pushing to accelerate the response, including clinical trials of the Ervebo vaccine, which is licensed against the Zaire strain but may offer some protection against Bundibugyo. Researchers are also developing vaccines specifically targeting Bundibugyo virus.
mRNA-1469 is an investigational vaccine developed using Moderna's messenger RNA (mRNA) platform, the same technology used in its COVID-19 vaccine. The vaccine builds on the company's broader research into filoviruses, the family of viruses that includes Ebola.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited