Mysterious Fog in the US , Canada and UK: A dense, eerie fog with a "burning chemical-like smell" has spooked a good part of North America and parts of the United Kingdom and Canada. With social media amplifying all concerns, this phenomenon has sparked attention across all social media platforms. However, at the heart of this mysterious fog are a conjunction of natural events, social psychology, and environmental conditions that culminated in all the conspiracy theories and public health fears. Here's a closer look at the mysterious fog, its potential causes, and the societal response it has triggered.

Fog that Feeds Fear

The first reports of this "mysterious fog" came in from Florida where a resident said that they experienced respiratory symptoms, feverish warmth, and stomach cramps after contact with the fog. Similar stories started flooding social media, and within a day or two, a sinister force seemed to sweep across the United States, Canada, and parts of the UK. From Texas to Minnesota, people reported weird odors and health issues that they thought were linked to this bizarre atmospheric event.

Some witnesses were said to see "white particles" swirling through the air; theories ranged from a chemical attack or experimental weapon to drone-related chemical dispersals and references to historical military experiments, such as the infamous 1950s "Operation Sea-Spray."

Fuel to the fire were added when videos and posts, hundreds of thousands in number, began circulating on social media sites like TikTok and X (formerly Twitter) speculating on the origin of the fog. Hashtags like #ToxicFog went trending for days. Hysteria created a self-reinforcing loop in which every post spurred further scrutiny and fear.

Scientific Explanation of the Dense Mysterious Fog

1. What is Fog?

Fog is essentially a low-lying cloud formed when the air temperature cools to its dew point, causing water vapor to condense into tiny droplets or ice crystals. Several types of fog—advection fog, radiation fog, and valley fog—can form depending on conditions such as warm, moist air moving over cooler land or when temperatures plummet rapidly under clear skies.

2. Why the Chemical Smell?

Such chemical-like smell as reported during the occurrence of fog events is sometimes attributed to air pollution. It acts like a sponge, where it absorbs these pollutants, which include sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, among others, that emit from industries. This mixture, therefore, leads to a stench that could be mistaken as unnatural or even toxic.

Also Read: Health Concerns Rise As US, Canada, and UK Come Under The Blanket Of Thick, Dense, Toxic Fog

3. What are the Health Concerns?

High moisture levels from fog can significantly exacerbate symptoms related to respiration, but especially in already predisposed asthmatics and allergy patients. The connection of these symptoms with actual fever, stomach cramps, and puffy eyes is too remote. Experts assume that the irritating effects of entrapped pollutants trapped in fog tend to affect more the eyes and throat rather than the rest of the body affected by some report.

Psychological Effects of Mass Panic Caused by Social Media

Social media amplified a natural weather event into a health epidemic. It made the personal experience of individuals become a cause for fear and speculation, a domino effect.

According to psychologists, this is a concept of selective perception, wherein once people's attention is drawn to environmental anomalies, they begin to notice them. This mirrors earlier panics, such as the Seattle windshield pitting panic of 1954. Then, atomic bomb testing caused fear in many and started to have people looking at their windshields for small marks that they had not seen before. Likewise, postings on the strangeness of the fog probably increased public awareness and suspicion, with people looking to attach unrelated symptoms to the phenomenon.

The fog hysteria shares a commonality with other instances of mass panic, such as the "drone sightings" of recent years or the Cold War-era fears of biological warfare.

Also Read: Mysterious Fog Is Making Americans Sick

These events underscore how fear can cloud judgment, especially when amplified by social media and sensationalist headlines. While historical cases, such as "Operation Sea-Spray," offer concrete evidence of the existence of unethical experiments, the jump from a natural weather condition to theories of chemical attacks exemplifies a more modern trend of connecting unrelated dots, all wonderfully seeded in distrust and anxiety.

Despite the swirling rumors, meteorologists and scientists are in agreement that the mysterious fog is not as alarming as it seems. It is well known that fog traps and amplifies pollutants, especially in urban and industrial regions. Moreover, winter months are the most conducive for fog formation, so its recent prevalence is unsurprising.

On the other hand, environmentalists advise that the fog should wake everyone up to increased levels of pollution. The reported odors and health irritations could be just symptoms of far deeper systemic issues like industrial emissions and lack of control over air quality.

The authorities must be transparent in their communication to combat misinformation and allay public fears. Governments and environmental agencies must provide timely updates on weather phenomena, air quality, and health risks. Initiatives like real-time pollutant tracking and public education campaigns can help demystify natural occurrences while addressing valid environmental concerns.

The mysterious Canada fog is a compelling case study in how environmental events intersect with psychology and societal dynamics. While rooted in natural phenomena, the fog became a vessel for collective fears, amplified by modern technology and historical anxieties.

In this information era where communication occurs at an almost lightning pace, the fog becomes a metaphor that reminds everyone about scientific literacy, environmental responsibility, and an effective balance when considering public concern. Whether perceived as a marvel of nature or as a tale that serves to teach, it left a very powerful mark in people's minds.

Leprosy will soon be a notifiable disease in India’s national capital, Delhi, in a move to boost surveillance, improve early diagnosis and treatment, the state health department has said.

The Delhi Health Department has submitted the proposal, under the Delhi Epidemic Diseases Act, for necessary approval. Once approved, Delhi will join states like Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, Karnataka, and West Bengal that have already made leprosy notifiable.

“Leprosy is completely curable. Making it a notifiable disease will help us find hidden cases, stop transmission, and ensure every patient gets standard treatment with dignity. This is a critical step towards honoring our commitment to a leprosy-free Delhi and supporting India’s journey towards the interruption of its transmission by 2030,” Health Minister Pankaj Singh said, in a statement.

Why Notifying Leprosy Is Important?

More than 40 per cent of leprosy patients are managed by private health facilities in India, revealed a recent pan-India study. As a result, most go unreported to the National Leprosy Eradication Programme (NLEP).

Cases that go unreported continue to spike the risk of transmission. The variance in treatment protocols also raises the threat of drug resistance. WHO's Independent Evaluation of the NLEP program in India suggests that leprosy should be included in the list of diseases mandatory for notification.

According to the Ministry, the notification will mandate all government and private healthcare providers, including clinics, hospitals, and individual practitioners, to report every new leprosy case to the District Leprosy Officer.

Mandatory notification will

• boost surveillance
• boost targeted interventions
• lead to early diagnosis
• prompt early treatment with standard Multi-Drug Therapy (MDT)
• reduce disability risk
• prevent transmission through timely contact tracing and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP),
• reduce stigma and discrimination by normalizing leprosy as a treatable medical condition,
• improve treatment compliance and reduced defaulter rates,
• boost ownership among all healthcare establishments toward the common goal of leprosy eradication.

The proposed notification will be issued following the advice of the Delhi Government as per the GNCTD Act 1991. Detailed reporting formats and guidelines will be shared with all health institutions and practitioners across the National Capital Territory of Delhi.

Also read: ORS For Schoolchildren, Cool Roofs, Misting Systems: Here's All About Delhi’s Heatwave Action Plan 2026

What Is Leprosy?

Leprosy is also known as Hansen's disease. It is a chronic infectious disease that is caused by the bacterium Mycobacterium leprae. It affects the skin, peripheral nerves, upper respiratory tract mucosa, and eyes.

If it is not treated promptly, it could lead to permanent nerve damage, disabilities, and social stigma. However, the condition is fully curable with multidrug therapy, and early detection could prevent further complications.

Leprosy is also a neglected tropical disease (NTD), which occurs in more than 120 countries, with around 2,00,000 new cases reported every year.

The Prevalence Of Leprosy In India

India achieved the official elimination of leprosy as a public health problem (less than 1 case per 10,000 population) nationally in December 2005. However, the country still accounts for approximately 59 per cent of global annual new leprosy cases.

As per data from the Health Ministry, till March 2025, 31 states/UTs and 638 districts have achieved less than 1 case per 10,000 population of leprosy, with a prevalence rate of 0.57 per 10,000.

The NLEP now targets "Zero Transmission, Zero Leprosy" by 2027 through early detection, free multidrug therapy (MDT), and stigma reduction.

Under the NLEP, the government provides services such as free diagnosis and treatment (MDT) at all government health facilities, microcellular rubber footwears for patients, free assistive devices for leprosy patients, self-care kits for patients with ulcers, and reconstructive surgery for Grade 2 deformities with a welfare allowance of Rs 12,000.

All services under NLEP are available free of cost at all government health facilities.

The Supreme Court of India has urged the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) to set up an expert panel

to examine how brain death is certified in India.

The apex Court has sought to know whether additional tests, such as electroencephalogram (EEG) and angiogram, are needed to declare a person brain dead.

A bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta was hearing a petition filed by Kerala-based medic and activist S Ganapathy, alleging malpractices in brain death certification, Times of India reported.

Ganapathy alleged that patients who may not be brain dead are sometimes declared so to facilitate organ donation. The petition also questioned the reliability of the apnea test—the standard method used to confirm brain death—calling it subjective and claiming that the legal requirement of video graphing the procedure is often not followed.

What is Brain Death?

Brain death, technically referred to as brain-stem death, is the irreversible end of all brain activity.

In India, according to the Transplantation of Human Organs (THO) Act, 1994 (Subsection 6 of Section 3), 'brain stem death' refers to the stage at which all functions of the brain stem have permanently and irreversibly ceased.

This is to be certified by a 'Board of Medical Experts' consisting of:

(1) The medical superintendent (MS)/In-Charge of the hospital in which 'brain stem' death has occurred,

(2) a specialist,

(3) a neurologist or a neurosurgeon nominated by the MS, from a panel approved by the Appropriate Authority, and the doctor under whose care the 'brain- stem' death has occurred.

Amendments in the THO Act 2011 have allowed the selection of a surgeon/physician and an anesthetist, if an approved neurosurgeon or neurologist is unavailable.

“Brain stem death has to be certified by a panel of four independent doctors, including a neurologist or neurosurgeon, and confirmed twice with a minimum gap of six hours. The process is carried out with due diligence and seriousness,” Dr Manjari Tripathi, head of neurology at AIIMS, was quoted as saying.

“While the guidelines require the team of doctors to meet and declare brain death at least twice, we end up doing it sometimes three times for the patients. The current guidelines require various bedside tests for the declaration of brain death. It does not specify the need for tests such as an EEG or angiogram,” added Dr. Tripathi.

Experts said additional tests could add to the system burden. EEG is not routinely recommended for brainstem death certification, while an angiogram is used only in select cases where the apnea test cannot be performed. Globally, the apnea test remains the gold standard. These criteria are clearly laid down and cannot be altered, said experts.

Challenges To Brain Death Certification In India

The Indian Express reported that the lack of knowledge even among physicians is a significant challenge in India.

This leads to several patients never being officially declared and asked to be organ donors.

An AIIMS-led study, published in the journal Neurology India last year, found that more than half the doctors — including neurosurgeons, neurologists, and critical care specialists who are most commonly included in the certification process — did not receive any training on brain death certification at the time of their graduation.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved Merck's Idvynso (doravirine/islatravir), a new, once-daily pill for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in adults.

The two-drug single tablet replaces the current antiretroviral regimen in those who are virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies per mL).

The single tablet contains 100 mg doravirine and 0.25 mg islatravir. The FDA has approved it for adults on a stable antiretroviral regimen with no history of virologic treatment failure and no known substitutions associated with resistance to doravirine.

“IDVYNSO combines islatravir, a next-generation NRTI with multiple mechanisms of action, including translocation inhibition, with doravirine, an NNRTI with an established efficacy and safety profile,” said Dr. Eliav Barr, senior vice president and chief medical officer, Merck Research Laboratories, in a statement.

How Was The Pill Approved?

The approval is based on data from two randomized, active-controlled, noninferiority trials. In the double-blind Trial 052, participants were randomly assigned to stay on Glilead's Biktarvy (bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide; 171 individuals) or switch to Idvynso (342 individuals).

Results showed that 1 per cent of participants in both groups had a viral load of ≥50 copies/mL at 48 weeks.

In the open-label Trial 051, participants were randomly assigned to stay on their oral antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimen (185 individuals) or switch to Idvynso (366 individuals).

Results showed that 1 per cent of participants who were switched to Idvynso had a viral load of ≥50 copies/mL at week 48 versus 5 per cent who continued on ART.

"As the only two-drug, non-integrase strand transfer inhibitor, tenofovir-free regimen, Idvynso expands therapeutic diversity beyond the currently available oral treatment options," Barr said.

"As the health needs of adults living with HIV change over time, Idvynso gives clinicians a new choice for HIV treatment."

What Is IDVYNSO? How Does It Work?

IDVYNSO is a fixed-dose combination of two medicines, doravirine with islatravir.

Doravirine is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) that inhibits HIV-1 replication by non-competitive inhibition of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase.

Islatravir is a potent, next-generation nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) that blocks HIV-1 replication by multiple mechanisms, including:

• inhibition of reverse transcriptase translocation, resulting in immediate chain termination,
• induction of structural changes in the viral DNA (delayed chain termination).

Global Burden Of HIV

According to the latest data from UNAIDS, 40.8 million people globally were living with HIV in 2024. Of these, 39.4 million were adults (15 years or older) and 1.4 million were children (0–14 years).

While 1.3 million people became newly infected with HIV in 2024, 630,000 died from AIDS-related illnesses.

About 87 per cent of all people living with HIV knew their HIV status, and 5.3 million people did not know that they were living with HIV.