Image Credit: Canva (representational purpose only)
Mysterious Fog in the US , Canada and UK: A dense, eerie fog with a "burning chemical-like smell" has spooked a good part of North America and parts of the United Kingdom and Canada. With social media amplifying all concerns, this phenomenon has sparked attention across all social media platforms. However, at the heart of this mysterious fog are a conjunction of natural events, social psychology, and environmental conditions that culminated in all the conspiracy theories and public health fears. Here's a closer look at the mysterious fog, its potential causes, and the societal response it has triggered.
The first reports of this "mysterious fog" came in from Florida where a resident said that they experienced respiratory symptoms, feverish warmth, and stomach cramps after contact with the fog. Similar stories started flooding social media, and within a day or two, a sinister force seemed to sweep across the United States, Canada, and parts of the UK. From Texas to Minnesota, people reported weird odors and health issues that they thought were linked to this bizarre atmospheric event.
Some witnesses were said to see "white particles" swirling through the air; theories ranged from a chemical attack or experimental weapon to drone-related chemical dispersals and references to historical military experiments, such as the infamous 1950s "Operation Sea-Spray."
Fuel to the fire were added when videos and posts, hundreds of thousands in number, began circulating on social media sites like TikTok and X (formerly Twitter) speculating on the origin of the fog. Hashtags like #ToxicFog went trending for days. Hysteria created a self-reinforcing loop in which every post spurred further scrutiny and fear.
Fog is essentially a low-lying cloud formed when the air temperature cools to its dew point, causing water vapor to condense into tiny droplets or ice crystals. Several types of fog—advection fog, radiation fog, and valley fog—can form depending on conditions such as warm, moist air moving over cooler land or when temperatures plummet rapidly under clear skies.
Such chemical-like smell as reported during the occurrence of fog events is sometimes attributed to air pollution. It acts like a sponge, where it absorbs these pollutants, which include sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, among others, that emit from industries. This mixture, therefore, leads to a stench that could be mistaken as unnatural or even toxic.
Also Read: Health Concerns Rise As US, Canada, and UK Come Under The Blanket Of Thick, Dense, Toxic Fog
High moisture levels from fog can significantly exacerbate symptoms related to respiration, but especially in already predisposed asthmatics and allergy patients. The connection of these symptoms with actual fever, stomach cramps, and puffy eyes is too remote. Experts assume that the irritating effects of entrapped pollutants trapped in fog tend to affect more the eyes and throat rather than the rest of the body affected by some report.
Social media amplified a natural weather event into a health epidemic. It made the personal experience of individuals become a cause for fear and speculation, a domino effect.
According to psychologists, this is a concept of selective perception, wherein once people's attention is drawn to environmental anomalies, they begin to notice them. This mirrors earlier panics, such as the Seattle windshield pitting panic of 1954. Then, atomic bomb testing caused fear in many and started to have people looking at their windshields for small marks that they had not seen before. Likewise, postings on the strangeness of the fog probably increased public awareness and suspicion, with people looking to attach unrelated symptoms to the phenomenon.
The fog hysteria shares a commonality with other instances of mass panic, such as the "drone sightings" of recent years or the Cold War-era fears of biological warfare.
Also Read: Mysterious Fog Is Making Americans Sick
These events underscore how fear can cloud judgment, especially when amplified by social media and sensationalist headlines. While historical cases, such as "Operation Sea-Spray," offer concrete evidence of the existence of unethical experiments, the jump from a natural weather condition to theories of chemical attacks exemplifies a more modern trend of connecting unrelated dots, all wonderfully seeded in distrust and anxiety.
Despite the swirling rumors, meteorologists and scientists are in agreement that the mysterious fog is not as alarming as it seems. It is well known that fog traps and amplifies pollutants, especially in urban and industrial regions. Moreover, winter months are the most conducive for fog formation, so its recent prevalence is unsurprising.
On the other hand, environmentalists advise that the fog should wake everyone up to increased levels of pollution. The reported odors and health irritations could be just symptoms of far deeper systemic issues like industrial emissions and lack of control over air quality.
The authorities must be transparent in their communication to combat misinformation and allay public fears. Governments and environmental agencies must provide timely updates on weather phenomena, air quality, and health risks. Initiatives like real-time pollutant tracking and public education campaigns can help demystify natural occurrences while addressing valid environmental concerns.
The mysterious Canada fog is a compelling case study in how environmental events intersect with psychology and societal dynamics. While rooted in natural phenomena, the fog became a vessel for collective fears, amplified by modern technology and historical anxieties.
In this information era where communication occurs at an almost lightning pace, the fog becomes a metaphor that reminds everyone about scientific literacy, environmental responsibility, and an effective balance when considering public concern. Whether perceived as a marvel of nature or as a tale that serves to teach, it left a very powerful mark in people's minds.
Credit: iStock
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) affects nearly 1 billion adults worldwide and is linked to cardiovascular disease, stroke and increased mortality.
Eli Lilly’s GLP-1 drugs Mounjaro and Zepbound, which contain tirzepatide, have shown promise in treating sleep apnea in a new review.
While continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), which uses air pressure to keep the airway open during sleep, remains the standard treatment, some people struggle to use it long term. Adherence rates of 30% to 60% limit its effectiveness at the population level. The review showed that GLP-1 medications may be a potential complementary therapy alongside CPAP.
Researchers from the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pennsylvania, reviewed existing evidence on GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) for OSA.
Six meta-analyses found consistent reductions in the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), ranging from 5.7 to 21.9 fewer events per hour.
The Phase 3 SURMOUNT-OSA trials found that tirzepatide reduced AHI by 20 to 24 events per hour compared with placebo. Between 42% and 50% of patients achieved disease remission.
Weight loss is the main established mechanism. GLP-1 RAs may reduce tongue fat and parapharyngel fat, which contribute to airway collapse.
Researchers also identified potential weight-independent effects involving chemosensitivity, leptin pathways and NLRP3 inflammasome suppression, although these mechanisms remain under investigation.
GLP-1 RAs did not match CPAP efficacy, with approximately 22 versus 31 fewer AHI events per hour. Cardiovascular benefits remain unproven, and weight regain commonly occurs after treatment stops.
The researchers said GLP-1 drugs are best positioned as complementary therapy alongside CPAP and other treatments.
The drugs may be appropriate for people with a BMI above 30 who are unable to tolerate CPAP or have obesity-related comorbidities. They are less likely to benefit people without obesity or those with primarily anatomical airway obstruction.
“This review suggests that GLP-1 RAs offer otolaryngologists a disease-modifying adjunct for obesity-related OSA that is best positioned as complementary therapy alongside CPAP, preoperative optimization before upper airway surgery, or potentially to expand hypoglossal nerve stimulator candidacy,” said the researchers in the paper published in JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery.
OSA occurs when the airway becomes blocked during sleep, causing breathing to repeatedly stop and restart. These interruptions can occur five to 100 times an hour and can lower oxygen levels and disrupt sleep.
In OSA, the airways become partially or completely blocked when the muscles in the head relax during sleep. This can cause soft tissue to obstruct the windpipe, making it difficult for air to pass through.
While asleep, the chest muscles may work harder than usual to reopen the airway. This can cause jerks, deep gasps and repeated disruptions to sleep.
Common symptoms include:
People may not notice these symptoms themselves, but a partner or family member may observe them.
Measures that may help prevent or manage sleep apnea include:
Credit: Wikimedia Commons
The 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center killed nearly 3,000 people, and scores of young children, infants and toddlers, as well as some still in the womb, were exposed to toxic air in and around Manhattan and the Ground Zero site.
Within seconds of the collapse of the World Trade Center, the area was filled with a cloud of dust. In the days, weeks and months that followed, the area was exposed to settling dust containing pulverized concrete, glass fibers, asbestos and other pollutants.
While various health program have emerged to address the ongoing health effects of the September 11 attacks, there have been few focused on children exposed to them.
Scientists say exposure to toxins may have long-term health consequences, including trauma, chronic illnesses, cancers, cardiovascular diseases and reproductive health problems. Some of these effects may only now be emerging as those children reach their 30s and early 40s.
Major questions remain about whether exposure to toxins and trauma on 9/11 and afterward increased their long-term health risks, according to scientists.
The federal World Trade Center Health Program and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are behind the Youth Research Cohort, which was first announced by the US Congress in 2022.
The project is expected to kick off on July 1, 2027, according to a government website announcing federal grants. The same site says research will begin once the number of people participating “grows large enough.”
Also read: 9/11 Toxic Air Exposed Thousands: What New Records Reveal 25 Years Later
The CDC has specified that study participants will have been 21 years old or younger, or in utero, and living below 14th Street in Manhattan or anywhere in Brooklyn on and after 9/11.
A cohort of similarly aged but unexposed individuals will be recruited for comparison.
It is not clear how many participants the CDC hopes to recruit, but $50 million in programme funding is estimated.
In adult survivors and first responders, dozens of types of cancers and other health issues related to their exposure have been identified.
Since 9/11, more than 96,000 people have been diagnosed with physical and mental health conditions as a result of exposure to the dust, smoke, debris and traumatic events of 9/11, according to the WTC Health Program. The program says it has recorded more than 9,000 deaths since 9/11, but it is not clear what role 9/11 played in those deaths.
Read More: PM2.5 Linked To 8.82 Million Global Cancer Cases, Accounts for Largest Share Among Pollutants: Study
Cancer cases linked to the September 11, 2001, World Trade Center terror attacks have surged 75%, according to new research, highlighting the ongoing health crisis even 25 years later.
The research was conducted by Northwell Health’s Long Island Jewish (LIJ) Medical Center, which provides free medical monitoring to people affected by the aftermath of the attacks at New York’s World Trade Center.
About two-thirds of all enrollees are certified for at least one WTC-related health condition, while 30% of those enrolled through Northwell have battled cancer. That number is expected to rise dramatically over the next decade.
A trove of newly released files by New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani also indicated that toxic air persisted for months after the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center and that officials played down the health risks.
Credit: AI Image
The Supreme Court has pushed for stronger front-of-pack warnings on packaged foods high in sugar, salt or fat, questioning the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India’s (FSSAI) two-phase labelling proposal.
On Thursday, Justice J.B. Pardiwala questioned the need for a two-phase approach.
“It has to be sugar and salt. Only then will you ask them to put a label?” Pardiwala said, stressing the word “and”.
FSSAI’s lawyer, Additional Solicitor General Brijender Chahar, said the regulator could now roll out the phases “in one go”, Reuters reported.
This could mean foods high in even one of the three nutrients — added sugar, salt or fat — would carry a red hexagonal warning.
The proposed labels would read “HIGH FAT”, “HIGH SUGAR”, “HIGH SALT” or “HIGHLY SWEETENED BEVERAGE”, making it easier for consumers to identify products high in these nutrients.
Under the earlier proposal, red hexagonal warnings would apply to products exceeding limits in at least two of three categories — added sugar, salt or saturated fat. Stricter rules would follow in the second phase.
Health experts criticized the proposal, arguing that the two-nutrient requirement could allow several products to escape warnings. Reuters reported that the approach had been described as an “industry-friendly loophole”.
Experts also raised concerns over the use of added sugar instead of total sugar and the size of the warning label.
India had already defined high-fat, sugar and salt (HFSS) foods in its 2022 draft regulations and invited public feedback.
Dr. Sivaranjini Santosh, a paediatrician and social activist, said in a post on X that the FSSAI proposal had “too many loopholes”.
Packaged foods generally carry nutritional information on the back or side, requiring consumers to turn the packet around to compare products.
A prominent red warning on the front could make high levels of sugar, salt or fat easier to spot, particularly when comparing similar products or choosing food for children.
The aim is not necessarily to tell consumers to never eat a product, but to provide information before purchase and help them decide how often to consume it.
However, a warning label cannot compensate for an overall unhealthy diet.
Read More: Synthetic Paneer Whitened With Chuna Busted In Delhi: How Dangerous Is It For Your Health?
A recent LocalCircles survey of more than 83,000 consumers across 314 districts found strong support for front-of-pack warnings.
Around 80% wanted FSSAI to mandate warnings, while another 11% wanted them specifically on ultra-processed foods. Overall, 91% supported front-of-pack warnings in some form.
Around 44% preferred a red warning symbol for products high in sugar, salt or saturated fat, while 27% chose traffic-light color coding. Only 2% preferred the conventional black-and-white nutrition panel.
About 450 million Indians could be obese or overweight by 2050, according to a recent study published in The Lancet.
Ultra-processed foods have also been linked to a range of health concerns, including diabetes, high blood pressure, cancers, and fatty liver adding to calls for clearer information on packaged foods.
“We are concerned with the health of people, more particularly growing children. We have taken it up very seriously. We expect one and all to extend their cooperation to a cause which is in national interest,” the Supreme Court said.
© $2026 Times Horizon Private Limited