'We Have The Means To Prevent 80% Heart Attacks And Strokes', Expert Urges NHS To Give 'Polypill'

Updated Mar 6, 2025 | 05:00 AM IST

SummaryA polypill combining statins and blood pressure drugs could prevent 80% of heart attacks and strokes. Research shows it cuts cardiovascular risk by a third, benefiting millions globally with minimal side effects.
'We Have The Means To Prevent 80% Heart Attacks And Strokes', Expert Urges NHS To Give 'Polypill'

Image Credits: Canva

Heart attacks and strokes are among the leading causes of death globally, with millions suffering from cardiovascular diseases (CVD) every year. There are more than seven million people in the UK alone, with about 100,000 patients experiencing heart attacks annually. However, a group of researchers at University College London (UCL) estimate that one 'polypill' taken daily day could eliminate a majority of these cases dramatically lowering death tolls.

The proposed polypill, a combination of a statin and three blood pressure-lowering drugs, has been under study for over two decades. Experts argue that introducing this pill universally for individuals aged 50 and above could be more effective than the current NHS Health Check, which assesses risk factors every five years for those aged between 40 and 74.

Studies have repeatedly proven the effectiveness of the polypill in preventing CVD. A groundbreaking 2019 study in The Lancet found that five years' use of the polypill cut the risk of heart attack and stroke by a third. In addition, previous modelling analyses have estimated that if given universally to people over 55, the polypill might be able to prevent 80% of heart attacks and strokes.

Today, the NHS Health Check follows a risk-based model in which patients are tested for CVD risk factors and treated with drugs accordingly. Yet, as per UCL's study, this system has serious flaws:

Low Uptake: Just 40% of those eligible for the NHS Health Check choose to have it, leaving a considerable number of at-risk patients undiagnosed and untreated.

Ineffective Prediction of Risk: The majority of heart attacks and strokes happen to people at average risk levels, thus making it challenging to identify the need for intervention effectively.

Limited Effectiveness: Even at maximum take-up, the NHS Health Check programme is predicted to have fewer health impacts compared to a polypill initiative applied to the whole population.

Simplicity and Affordability of the Polypill Strategy

One of the big benefits of the polypill is that it is so easy. In contrast to the existing screening-based model, the polypill scheme would not involve complicated medical tests or lengthy risk assessments. Instead, people reaching 50 would just have to fill out a few questions to determine possible side effects before they were prescribed.

Professor Aroon Hingorani of the UCL Institute of Cardiovascular Science, one of the strongest proponents of this scheme, says:

"Finally, the time is now to do much better on prevention. A population approach would prevent a lot more heart attacks and strokes than is done today with a strategy of trying to target a smaller group only."

Aside from the possible health implications, the polypill is also an economic solution. The drugs used are off-patent, thus cheap to produce and distribute. With the vast economic cost of managing CVD-related illnesses, a preventive model could result in substantial cost-saving for the NHS in the future.

The polypill has been proven to be effective by numerous international trials. In 2019, a randomised trial in rural Iran discovered that participants who took the polypill for five years had a 34% reduced risk of having a heart attack or stroke compared to non-participants.

Likewise, modelling research has indicated that even if only 8% of people aged over 50 took up the polypill regimen, it would still be more beneficial to their health than the NHS Health Check programme.

Is This a Case of Over-Medicalisation?

One of the main objections to the polypill strategy is the suggestion that it might result in the unnecessary medicalisation of a significant proportion of the population. But, it is argued, it should be considered as a preventative measure, not as mass medication.

Professor Sir Nicholas Wald of UCL's Institute of Health Informatics explains:

"Instead of being a 'medicalisation' of a significant proportion of the population, a polypill programme is a prevention measure to prevent an individual from becoming a patient."

He compares it with public health measures like water fluoridation or compulsory seatbelts—interventions that have been shown to have a significant impact in reducing public health danger at low individual cost.

With the evidence in favour of the polypill's effectiveness and viability overwhelming, experts are calling on the NHS to act now. It is their belief that substituting the NHS Health Check with a polypill-based prevention program could be the UK government's flagship policy under its pledge to put disease prevention ahead of cure.

As Professor Hingorani points out, "The status quo is not a justifiable option." With CVD still a major cause of death globally, taking a population-wide polypill approach could be a turning point for preventative medicine, potentially saving thousands of lives annually. The question now is whether the NHS will take up this call and establish a policy with the potential to transform the prevention of cardiovascular disease on a national level.

End of Article

Cancer Survivorship Beyond Treatment: Why Caregiver Support Must Become A Standard Of Oncology Care

Updated Jul 4, 2026 | 05:00 PM IST

SummaryWe must acknowledge that supporting caregivers is not separate from supporting patients. It is an integral part of comprehensive cancer care and long-term survivorship.
Cancer Survivorship Beyond Treatment: Why Caregiver Support Must Become A Standard Of Oncology Care

Credit: iStock

Cancer care has evolved significantly over the last few decades. Today, success is measured not only by survival rates but also by quality of life, emotional well-being, and the ability to return to a regular life after treatment. Yet, in our pursuit of patient-centered care, an essential component often remains invisible: caregivers.

Every cancer diagnosis affects more than just the patient. Behind every woman navigating treatment is often a spouse, parent, sibling, child, or friend who assumes the role of caregiver. They accompany patients to appointments, help manage treatment schedules, provide emotional reassurance, and often become the primary support system through one of life's most challenging experiences.

Why Caregivers Need Support

Despite their indispensable role, caregivers frequently receive little formal support themselves.

As oncologists, we witness this every day. We see caregivers putting their own health, careers, and emotional needs on hold to care for a loved one. While patients are understandably at the center of treatment, caregivers often carry an immense psychological and physical burden that goes unrecognized.

Through years of clinical practice, I have come to understand that caregivers are not merely bystanders in the cancer journey; they are active partners in healing. Yet, many families find themselves navigating unfamiliar territory with little guidance on what to expect, how to cope, or where to seek support.

The guide was conceived as a practical, step-by-step resource to help caregivers navigate different stages of the cancer journey from diagnosis and treatment to recovery and survivorship. More importantly, it acknowledges their resilience, fears, sacrifices, and emotional struggles, while equipping them with the information and support needed to care for both their loved ones and themselves.

Cancer Survivorship Is a Shared Journey

Cancer survivorship does not begin when treatment ends; it begins when patients and families start rebuilding their lives after cancer. Survivors may continue to face concerns around recurrence, fertility, body image, relationships, mental health, and long-term treatment effects. Caregivers, too, often carry lingering anxiety, exhaustion, and emotional trauma long after active treatment is over.

If we truly want to improve survivorship outcomes, caregiver support must become a standard component of oncology care rather than an afterthought.

This support can take many forms. It may include counselling services, support groups, educational resources, survivorship planning sessions, and opportunities for caregivers to openly discuss their own concerns. Equally important is creating healthcare environments where caregivers feel seen, heard, and included in care conversations.

Moving Towards Holistic Cancer Care

It is about time cancer care should move beyond a disease-centered approach towards a more holistic understanding of survivorship. While medical treatment remains central, there is growing recognition that recovery is also shaped by emotional well-being, family support systems, fertility concerns, body image, nutrition, rehabilitation, and quality of life after treatment.

This broader view of cancer care requires us to look beyond the patient alone. Caregivers are often the invisible backbone of the treatment journey, yet their needs frequently go unaddressed. As healthcare professionals, we must acknowledge that supporting caregivers is not separate from supporting patients. It is an integral part of comprehensive cancer care and long-term survivorship.

Caring Beyond Cure

As healthcare systems continue to advance, we must expand our understanding of what comprehensive cancer care looks like. A patient cannot thrive in isolation. When caregivers are empowered, informed, and emotionally supported, patient outcomes improve and survivorship becomes more sustainable for everyone involved.

Cancer survivorship is not an individual journey. It is a shared experience of resilience, hope, and recovery. By recognizing caregivers as integral members of the care team and providing them with the support they need, we move one step closer to a more humane and holistic model of oncology care, one that truly cares beyond cure.

(Dr. Jyoti Wadhwa, Principal Lead, Medical & Precision Oncology, Apollo Athenaa Women's Centre)

End of Article

Bryan Johnson Blames Sugary Cereals, Soda and Stress for His Autoimmune Disease; Shares Treatment Plan

Updated Jul 4, 2026 | 07:00 AM IST

Summary​Bryan Johnson noted that autoimmune gastritis can cause irreversible damage, including nutritional deficiencies, anemia, and an increased long-term risk of stomach cancer.
Bryan Johnson Blames Sugary Cereals, Soda and Stress for His Autoimmune Disease; Shares Treatment Plan

Credit: X/Instagram

Longevity expert and millionaire Bryan Johnson has revealed that he has been diagnosed with autoimmune gastritis (AIG), a condition in which the immune system attacks the stomach lining.

In a post on X, Johnson, known for his radical experiments, including receiving blood transfusions from his teenage son, said he believes years of eating sugary cereals, drinking soda, consuming fast food and experiencing chronic stress contributed to the development of his autoimmune conditions.

Calling it a "bad news", the millionaire said: "I have an autoimmune disease. My stomach is eating itself". He added that "2–5% of people have this, too. Likely more, because it hides".

“As a kid, I ate sugar cereal, drank sugary soda, and gobbled down fast food. I had a few healthy years in my early 20s, but then became a young father of three and began building a business. Juggling that stress and grind, I let my health slip and gained 40 lbs,” he wrote.

He added that he later developed chronic depression and believes that during this period, his body began an autoimmune process affecting both his thyroid and stomach lining.

Also read: Donald Trump Posts AI Video of Himself Treating Critics for 'Derangement Syndrome'

Diagnosed With Hypothyroidism At 21

Johnson said he was diagnosed with hypothyroidism at the age of 21 during a routine blood test. He has since managed the condition with levothyroxine and Armour Thyroid.

“They are the hormones my body should be producing on its own, but wasn’t. By taking these pills daily, my body was able to operate as though my thyroid was functioning properly.”

He said his stomach had also begun attacking itself, but the condition went undetected because he had no symptoms. It was only discovered in May.

Johnson noted that autoimmune gastritis can cause irreversible damage, including nutritional deficiencies, anemia, and an increased long-term risk of stomach cancer.

Early Signs

Read More: Why Fentanyl Addiction Treatments Are Losing Effectiveness, Study Finds

Johnson said he had persistently low ferritin levels for the past 11 years despite not having anemia.

“We continually tried to raise my iron levels with food and supplementation, but nothing would work.”

He said he followed a plant-based diet, trained intensely, used a sauna and hyperbaric oxygen therapy, and took iron supplements, but his iron levels remained low.

A colonoscopy ruled out slow gastrointestinal bleeding, while an upper endoscopy with five stomach biopsies revealed early autoimmune gastritis. The biopsies showed early atrophy confined to the stomach's acid-producing lining, while

the rest of the stomach remained unaffected.

“So this was never one problem. It was three, linked to one another: the iron deficiency, the autoimmune gastritis driving it, and the autoimmune thyroid disease alongside it.”

Bryan Johnson's Treatment Plan

Johnson said he has undergone a large blood draw to sequence more than one million individual immune cells.

According to him, the goal is to identify the specific immune cell clones attacking his stomach lining. He compared immune cells to soldiers carrying unique "keys," explaining that the advanced sequencing technology can identify the rogue immune cells responsible for autoimmune gastritis.

Johnson said that once those immune cells are identified, the findings will help determine the most appropriate therapy to target and suppress the autoimmune attack.

What Is Autoimmune Gastritis?

Autoimmune gastritis (AIG) is a long-term autoimmune disorder in which the body's immune system mistakenly attacks the stomach's parietal cells, which produce stomach acid, as well as intrinsic factor, a protein essential for absorbing vitamin B12. Over time, this damages the stomach lining and reduces the body's ability to absorb iron and vitamin B12, increasing the risk of nutrient deficiencies.

In many people, symptoms are caused more by these nutritional deficiencies than by inflammation of the stomach itself.

Common symptoms include:

  • Ongoing fatigue and weakness
  • Low iron levels or iron-deficiency anemia
  • Vitamin B12 deficiency, which may lead to numbness, tingling, balance problems or memory difficulties
  • Pale skin and shortness of breath
  • Reduced appetite, bloating, nausea or discomfort in the upper abdomen
  • Mouth ulcers.

End of Article

Congo Starts Ebola Treatment Trial As Cases Reach 1,427, Deaths Hit 440

Updated Jul 4, 2026 | 12:00 AM IST

SummaryAccording to Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General, the PARTNERS trial in the DR Congo will evaluate the monoclonal antibody MBP134 and the antiviral drug remdesivir, alone and in combination.
Congo Starts Ebola Treatment Trial As Cases Reach 1,427, Deaths Hit 440

Credit: iStock/Canva

The Ebola outbreak in DR Congo has risen to 1,427 cases, while the death toll has climbed to 440, according to the latest government data.

More than 609 patients are hospitalized in Congo, while many have also recovered. Uganda has so far reported 20 confirmed cases and two deaths. There has also been one case in France and another in a US citizen medically evacuated to Germany, both believed to have been imported from areas affected by the ongoing outbreak.

The Ebola virus disease, caused by the Bundibugyo strain, has no approved vaccine or treatment.

"Even without approved therapeutics, people are recovering from this disease, but, of course, we could save many more lives with safe and effective therapeutics in our toolkit," said Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General.

He said this while announcing the launch of the clinical trial of two therapeutics, with the enrolment of the first patient.

"The PARTNERS trial will evaluate the monoclonal antibody MBP134 and the antiviral drug remdesivir, alone and in combination," he added.

Also read: Donald Trump Posts AI Video of Himself Treating Critics for 'Derangement Syndrome'

All About the Trial

The study is being coordinated by the DRC's National Institute for Biomedical Research, supported by a coalition of partners including WHO, and conducted in close cooperation with the affected communities.

According to Tedros, patients who enroll in the trial will receive comprehensive supportive care and close follow-up.

"We are also working to ensure they have access to the two drugs should they prove safe and efficacious in the trial."

In addition, the WHO has granted emergency use listing to the first molecular diagnostic test for Bundibugyo virus.

Further, the antiviral drug remdesivir, marketed as Veklury is also expected to start. Remdesivir became widely known during the COVID-19 pandemic and is being evaluated to determine whether it can improve outcomes when combined with the antibody treatment.

As per experts, it could take months, and possibly as many as 1,000 study participants, to determine whether either drug works.

Currently, the study is being offered only at one Ebola treatment center in Congo's Ituri province. The region has been heavily affected by violence, including attacks on healthcare workers responding to a virus spread through contact with infected patients' bodily fluids. Officials plan to expand the trial to other locations once it is safe to do so.

Read More: Australia Reports More H5 Bird Flu Cases: Does It Have Pandemic Potential?

Challenges Remain

Tedros said that despite the progress, significant challenges remain, including mistrust and violence.

This week, an Ebola treatment center in Ituri province was attacked, resulting in the deaths of two people. The center was set on fire, and patients fled.

Such acts not only endanger patients and health workers but also impede efforts to stop transmission and save lives.

He added that the complexity of the outbreak requires close coordination across the United Nations system.

What Is Ebola?

Ebola is a severe and often fatal viral hemorrhagic fever first identified in 1976. Since then, more than 30 outbreaks have been recorded, primarily in Central and West Africa.

Common Symptoms of Ebola

  • Fever
  • Headache
  • Weakness and fatigue
  • Vomiting
  • Diarrhea
  • Muscle pain
  • Sore throat
  • Unexplained bleeding or bruising.

End of Article