Heart attacks and strokes are among the leading causes of death globally, with millions suffering from cardiovascular diseases (CVD) every year. There are more than seven million people in the UK alone, with about 100,000 patients experiencing heart attacks annually. However, a group of researchers at University College London (UCL) estimate that one 'polypill' taken daily day could eliminate a majority of these cases dramatically lowering death tolls.

The proposed polypill, a combination of a statin and three blood pressure-lowering drugs, has been under study for over two decades. Experts argue that introducing this pill universally for individuals aged 50 and above could be more effective than the current NHS Health Check, which assesses risk factors every five years for those aged between 40 and 74.

Studies have repeatedly proven the effectiveness of the polypill in preventing CVD. A groundbreaking 2019 study in The Lancet found that five years' use of the polypill cut the risk of heart attack and stroke by a third. In addition, previous modelling analyses have estimated that if given universally to people over 55, the polypill might be able to prevent 80% of heart attacks and strokes.

Today, the NHS Health Check follows a risk-based model in which patients are tested for CVD risk factors and treated with drugs accordingly. Yet, as per UCL's study, this system has serious flaws:

Low Uptake: Just 40% of those eligible for the NHS Health Check choose to have it, leaving a considerable number of at-risk patients undiagnosed and untreated.

Ineffective Prediction of Risk: The majority of heart attacks and strokes happen to people at average risk levels, thus making it challenging to identify the need for intervention effectively.

Limited Effectiveness: Even at maximum take-up, the NHS Health Check programme is predicted to have fewer health impacts compared to a polypill initiative applied to the whole population.

Simplicity and Affordability of the Polypill Strategy

One of the big benefits of the polypill is that it is so easy. In contrast to the existing screening-based model, the polypill scheme would not involve complicated medical tests or lengthy risk assessments. Instead, people reaching 50 would just have to fill out a few questions to determine possible side effects before they were prescribed.

Professor Aroon Hingorani of the UCL Institute of Cardiovascular Science, one of the strongest proponents of this scheme, says:

"Finally, the time is now to do much better on prevention. A population approach would prevent a lot more heart attacks and strokes than is done today with a strategy of trying to target a smaller group only."

Aside from the possible health implications, the polypill is also an economic solution. The drugs used are off-patent, thus cheap to produce and distribute. With the vast economic cost of managing CVD-related illnesses, a preventive model could result in substantial cost-saving for the NHS in the future.

The polypill has been proven to be effective by numerous international trials. In 2019, a randomised trial in rural Iran discovered that participants who took the polypill for five years had a 34% reduced risk of having a heart attack or stroke compared to non-participants.

Likewise, modelling research has indicated that even if only 8% of people aged over 50 took up the polypill regimen, it would still be more beneficial to their health than the NHS Health Check programme.

Is This a Case of Over-Medicalisation?

One of the main objections to the polypill strategy is the suggestion that it might result in the unnecessary medicalisation of a significant proportion of the population. But, it is argued, it should be considered as a preventative measure, not as mass medication.

Professor Sir Nicholas Wald of UCL's Institute of Health Informatics explains:

"Instead of being a 'medicalisation' of a significant proportion of the population, a polypill programme is a prevention measure to prevent an individual from becoming a patient."

He compares it with public health measures like water fluoridation or compulsory seatbelts—interventions that have been shown to have a significant impact in reducing public health danger at low individual cost.

With the evidence in favour of the polypill's effectiveness and viability overwhelming, experts are calling on the NHS to act now. It is their belief that substituting the NHS Health Check with a polypill-based prevention program could be the UK government's flagship policy under its pledge to put disease prevention ahead of cure.

As Professor Hingorani points out, "The status quo is not a justifiable option." With CVD still a major cause of death globally, taking a population-wide polypill approach could be a turning point for preventative medicine, potentially saving thousands of lives annually. The question now is whether the NHS will take up this call and establish a policy with the potential to transform the prevention of cardiovascular disease on a national level.

Wegovy maker Novo Nordisk has ended its legal dispute with the Hims & Hers Health platform, according to a media report.

The two companies are likely to partner and sell the blockbuster obesity drug Wegovy together on the Hims & Hers Health platform, Bloomberg News reported.

Market analysts have expressed surprise on the move, as both Novo and Hims have been previously engaged in legal battle over Wegovy.

“There is no other way to describe the Hims news as both a surprise and an unabashed positive for Hims' stock,” Leerink Partners analyst Michael Cherny was quoted as saying in a note to clients.

A Novo spokesperson said in an emailed statement that the company is "always in conversation with companies that can help improve patient access to FDA-approved medicines".

The Dispute Between Novo and Hims

In February, Novo sued Hims for launching a similar version of its new Wegovy weight-loss pill for $49.

The Danish drugmaker accused Hims of patent infringement on Semaglutide -- the active ingredient behind its best-selling medications Ozempic and Wegovy.

Semaglutide is popularly known for weight loss , but is also effective for diabetes and is used primarily for that.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had also threatened action against Hims.

Last year, Novo had to end a short-lived agreement to sell Wegovy over Him's marketing tactics and continued sales of copycat versions of Wegovy.

Recently, the FDA has signaled plans to crack down on the proliferation of copycat, or compounded, weight-loss drugs.

Wegovy And Ozempic To Cost Less In 2027

Currently, Wegovy injections and pills cost $1,349.02 a month, whereas Ozempic and Rybelus cost $1,027.51, Novo told PEOPLE.

Individuals with commercial insurance pay $25 a month, whereas those using cash pay between $149 to $499. Patients on Medicare will pay $274 per month.

Late in February, Novo Nordisk announced it would slash the price for all doses:

• The list price of Wegovy injections and the new Wegovy pill will be cut in half
• Ozempic injections will be cut by 35 percent
• The semaglutide tablet Rybelsus will now cost $675 a month

"There are more than 100 million people living with obesity and over 35 million with type 2 diabetes and, and for some, list price has been a real barrier to access and affordability," Jamey Millar, Executive Vice President, US Operations of Novo Nordisk Inc., was quoted as saying to PEOPLE.

Indian Drugmakers Rush For Generic Weight Loss Drugs

Meanwhile, amid the patent expiration of semaglutide, several pharma companies in India are planning big launches of Wegovy's generic versions.

Several leading drugmakers have already secured regulatory approval or recommendations to produce and market generic versions of the weight loss drugs in the country.

Hyderabad-based Dr. Reddy's already applied for a trademark with the brand name Obeda and a logo.

Other companies like Sun Pharma, Zydus Lifesciences, and Nacto Pharma are also entering the rat race of launching multiple generic versions to make the treatment more affordable for patients with obesity and weight-related health risks.

Sun Pharma also announced the plans for "day-one" launches of generic prefilled pens.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)’s Vinay Prasad has once again — for the second time in less than a year — stepped down from his post as director of the agency’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, amid controversies over the review of vaccines and specialty drugs for rare diseases.

Announcing the news to FDA staff in an email late Friday, FDA Commissioner Marty Makary said Prasad would depart at the end of April. Makary added that Prasad would return to his academic position at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF).

Taking to social media platform X, Makary said that under Prasad’s leadership, his center recorded a record number of approvals in December.

“A year ago, Dr. Prasad came to the FDA to implement four major long-lasting reforms: a 2-to-1 pivotal trial requirement, national priority reviews, a risk-stratified COVID vaccine framework, and the new plausible mechanism framework for ultra-rare diseases, which we launched last week,” Makary said.

The FDA commissioner noted that Prasad “got a tremendous amount accomplished within his one-year sabbatical from UCSF and will be returning to his academic home later next month,” and thanked him “for his service and personal sacrifice in taking time away from his family.”

The FDA is expected to announce Prasad’s successor before his departure.

Who Is Vinay Prasad?

Vinay Prasad is an Indian-origin American hematologist-oncologist and author. He was first appointed as the FDA’s vaccines chief in May 2025.

Prasad, known as a longtime critic of the FDA’s standards for drug reviews, drew controversy for raising the bar for new drug approvals. The move did not sit well with pharmaceutical companies and reportedly dashed the hopes of some patients with rare diseases.

In July, he was removed from his position following disputes with biotechnology executives, patient organisations, and conservative allies of US President Donald Trump. He was later reinstated after Makary and US Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. pushed for reconsideration.

What Is The Controversy?

While Prasad, along with Makary, announced several measures to make FDA drug reviews faster and easier for companies, he also imposed new warnings and study requirements for some biotech drugs and vaccines.

This was particularly evident in the case of COVID-19 vaccines, which have been a target of criticism from Kennedy, who was a longtime anti-vaccine activist before joining the Trump administration.

The latest controversy involves the FDA’s interactions with Dutch biopharma company uniQure, which developed an experimental gene therapy for Huntington’s disease that is injected directly into the brain during a surgical procedure.

Huntington’s is a deadly neurological condition affecting about 40,000 Americans, and currently has no cure.

UniQure faced a setback after Prasad’s centre said its earlier studies were insufficient to support a biologics licence application.

During an earnings call earlier this week, the company said the FDA was demanding a new trial involving sham surgery for some patients.

Executives said the request for a sham-controlled trial contradicted earlier FDA guidance. They also questioned whether such an approach would be ethical for patients with Huntington’s disease, which is progressive and ultimately fatal, typically in middle age.

Earlier, Prasad also refused to allow the FDA to review a highly anticipated flu vaccine from Moderna made using mRNA technology.

The rejection of the application -- highly unusual for the FDA -- prompted Moderna to go public with Prasad’s decision and vow to formally challenge it.

A week after the rejection became public, the FDA reversed course and said it would accept the vaccine for review, pending an additional study from the company.

Prasad’s handling of rare-disease therapy applications also drew criticism after the FDA asked Sarepta Therapeutics, a drugmaker developing treatments for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, to pause shipments following reports of patient deaths.

The company initially resisted, wanting to continue distributing treatments for patients who could still walk, but later agreed. The agency, however, reversed the pause just days later.

Duchenne muscular dystrophy affects a small number of boys and young men who typically lose their ability to walk before puberty and often die by around age 30.

Union Health Minister JP Nadda has announced that cervical cancer screenings using Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (VIA) will now be available at Ayushman Arogya Mandirs and other health facilities for women between 30 and 65 years of age.

"Screening for cervical cancer is now available at 1,81,000 Ayushman Arogya Mandirs, also known as Health and Wellness Centers, across the country as a part of population based screening for early detection and treatment," said Nadda, while addressing a press briefing at the World Health Organization virtually.

Using VIA, a low-cost, point-of-care method, trained health workers will screen women for cervical cancer. Those who test positive will then be referred to higher centers for diagnostic confirmation and further evaluation.

Nadda also shared that the cervical cancer screening in the country has been expanded as part of comprehensive primary healthcare under the National Program for Prevention and Control of Non-Communicable Diseases (NP-NCD).

"Over 86 million women have already been screened for cervical cancer under the program, reflecting India’s sustained commitment to early detection and prevention," Nadda informed.

Despite being highly preventable as well as treatable, cervical cancer is a public health concern in India.

The country loses one women every eight minutes to cervical cancer.

As per the World Health Organization (WHO) Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, about 42,000 new cases of cervical cancer is reported annually in India. This underscores the need for preventive measures such as vaccination and early screening.

The WHO Global Strategy to eliminate cervical cancer includes the 90-70-90 targets by 2030 -- vaccinating 90 per cent of girls against HPV, screening 70 percent of women, and ensuring treatment for 90 percent of those diagnosed with cervical disease.

In line with the global strategy to fight cervical cancer, Prime Minister Narendra Modi recently also launched a free HPV vaccination drive that will target health and well being of adolescent girls in the country.

What Is Cervical Cancer?

Cervical cancer develops in a women's cervix (uterus opening) due to abnormal cell growth, primarily caused by persistent HPV infection, a common infection that's passed through sexual contact.

When exposed to HPV, the body's immune system typically prevents the virus from causing damage however, in a small percentage of people, the virus can survive for years and pave the way for some cervical cells to become cancerous.

Treatment involves surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, with early detection significantly improving outcomes, though it remains a major cancer in low-income countries Cervical cancer can also be prevented through vaccination and regular screening (Pap/HPV tests).

Symptoms Of Cervical Cancer

Cervical cancer has no symptoms in the early days and therefore, is hard to detect until it has spread. However, the early-stage symptoms include:

• Vaginal bleeding after sex
• Vaginal bleeding post-menopause
• Vaginal bleeding between periods or unusually heavy/long periods
• Watery vaginal discharge with a strong odour or containing blood
• Pelvic pain or pain during intercourse
• Advanced Cervical Cancer Symptoms (when cancer has spread beyond the cervix)
• Painful or difficult bowel movements or rectal bleeding
• Painful or difficult urination or blood in the urine
• Persistent dull backache
• Swelling of the legs
• Pain in the pelvis or lower abdomen

How Can Cervical Cancer Be Prevented?

Cervical cancer is largely preventable and, when detected early, it is highly treatable. The WHO recommends HPV vaccination for girls aged 9 to 14, before they become sexually active, along with regular cervical screening from age 30, or 25 for women living with HIV.

Despite this, unequal access to vaccination, screening and treatment continues to drive higher rates of illness and deaths in regions such as sub-Saharan Africa, Central America and Southeast Asia.