Heart attacks and strokes are among the leading causes of death globally, with millions suffering from cardiovascular diseases (CVD) every year. There are more than seven million people in the UK alone, with about 100,000 patients experiencing heart attacks annually. However, a group of researchers at University College London (UCL) estimate that one 'polypill' taken daily day could eliminate a majority of these cases dramatically lowering death tolls.

The proposed polypill, a combination of a statin and three blood pressure-lowering drugs, has been under study for over two decades. Experts argue that introducing this pill universally for individuals aged 50 and above could be more effective than the current NHS Health Check, which assesses risk factors every five years for those aged between 40 and 74.

Studies have repeatedly proven the effectiveness of the polypill in preventing CVD. A groundbreaking 2019 study in The Lancet found that five years' use of the polypill cut the risk of heart attack and stroke by a third. In addition, previous modelling analyses have estimated that if given universally to people over 55, the polypill might be able to prevent 80% of heart attacks and strokes.

Today, the NHS Health Check follows a risk-based model in which patients are tested for CVD risk factors and treated with drugs accordingly. Yet, as per UCL's study, this system has serious flaws:

Low Uptake: Just 40% of those eligible for the NHS Health Check choose to have it, leaving a considerable number of at-risk patients undiagnosed and untreated.

Ineffective Prediction of Risk: The majority of heart attacks and strokes happen to people at average risk levels, thus making it challenging to identify the need for intervention effectively.

Limited Effectiveness: Even at maximum take-up, the NHS Health Check programme is predicted to have fewer health impacts compared to a polypill initiative applied to the whole population.

Simplicity and Affordability of the Polypill Strategy

One of the big benefits of the polypill is that it is so easy. In contrast to the existing screening-based model, the polypill scheme would not involve complicated medical tests or lengthy risk assessments. Instead, people reaching 50 would just have to fill out a few questions to determine possible side effects before they were prescribed.

Professor Aroon Hingorani of the UCL Institute of Cardiovascular Science, one of the strongest proponents of this scheme, says:

"Finally, the time is now to do much better on prevention. A population approach would prevent a lot more heart attacks and strokes than is done today with a strategy of trying to target a smaller group only."

Aside from the possible health implications, the polypill is also an economic solution. The drugs used are off-patent, thus cheap to produce and distribute. With the vast economic cost of managing CVD-related illnesses, a preventive model could result in substantial cost-saving for the NHS in the future.

The polypill has been proven to be effective by numerous international trials. In 2019, a randomised trial in rural Iran discovered that participants who took the polypill for five years had a 34% reduced risk of having a heart attack or stroke compared to non-participants.

Likewise, modelling research has indicated that even if only 8% of people aged over 50 took up the polypill regimen, it would still be more beneficial to their health than the NHS Health Check programme.

Is This a Case of Over-Medicalisation?

One of the main objections to the polypill strategy is the suggestion that it might result in the unnecessary medicalisation of a significant proportion of the population. But, it is argued, it should be considered as a preventative measure, not as mass medication.

Professor Sir Nicholas Wald of UCL's Institute of Health Informatics explains:

"Instead of being a 'medicalisation' of a significant proportion of the population, a polypill programme is a prevention measure to prevent an individual from becoming a patient."

He compares it with public health measures like water fluoridation or compulsory seatbelts—interventions that have been shown to have a significant impact in reducing public health danger at low individual cost.

With the evidence in favour of the polypill's effectiveness and viability overwhelming, experts are calling on the NHS to act now. It is their belief that substituting the NHS Health Check with a polypill-based prevention program could be the UK government's flagship policy under its pledge to put disease prevention ahead of cure.

As Professor Hingorani points out, "The status quo is not a justifiable option." With CVD still a major cause of death globally, taking a population-wide polypill approach could be a turning point for preventative medicine, potentially saving thousands of lives annually. The question now is whether the NHS will take up this call and establish a policy with the potential to transform the prevention of cardiovascular disease on a national level.

India has seen a significant rise in the cancer burden, with the cases rising to 1,569,793 in 2025, the government has informed the Parliament.

From more than 1.4 million in 2021, the cancer cases in the country rose to over 144,000 in the last five years, revealed Prataprao Jadhav, Union Minister of State for Health, in a written reply in the Rajya Sabha.

The increase in cases has been consistent:

• 1,426,447 cases in 2021
• 1,461,427 cases in 2022
• 1,496,972 cases in 2023
• 1,533,055 cases in 2024
• 1,569,793 cases in 2025

Similarly, cancer deaths also increased in the country -- 868,588 in 2025 from 789,202 in 2021.

The country reported about 15,000 cancer -related deaths each year:

• 789,202 deaths in 2021
• 808,558 deaths in 2022
• 828,252 deaths in 2023
• 848,266 deaths in 2024
• 868,588 deaths in 2025

Worst-Affected States And Key Reasons

Jadhav informed that bigger states with large populations have seen a major increase in cancer cases and deaths consistently in the last five years.

States with the highest estimated cancer cases in 2025 include:

Uttar Pradesh - 226,125

Bihar - 118,136 cases

West Bengal - 121,639 cases

Maharashtra - 130,465 cases

Rajasthan - 80,628 cases

States with the highest estimated cancer deaths in 2025 include:

Uttar Pradesh - 125,184 deaths

Bihar - 65,571 deaths

West Bengal - 67,093 deaths

Maharashtra - 71,696 deaths

Rajasthan - 44,402 deaths

Major reasons for the rise in cancer burden include:

• environmental factors such as industrial pollution, pesticide exposure,
• contaminated water sources, by pollutants like industrial waste, pesticides, heavy metals, and pharmaceuticals.

“The review provides a critical analysis of the current evidence, summarizing the association of water contamination, including industrial waste, pesticides, and heavy metals, with rectal and colorectal cancer,” Jadhav stated in the Upper House of the Parliament.

Cancer Care Facilities In India

Jadhav further informed that the government is tackling the growing burden by expanding cancer care infrastructure across the country.

The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare has implemented the Strengthening of Tertiary Care Cancer Facilities Scheme, which has approved:

• 19 State Cancer Institutes (SCI)
• 20 Tertiary Care Cancer Centers (TCCC)

Other high-quality comprehensive cancer care facilities in the country include:

• Tata Memorial Centre’s (TMC) six hospitals in Varanasi, Visakhapatnam, New Chandigarh, Guwahati, Sangrur, and Muzaffarpur
• Cancer treatment facilities in all 22 new AIIMS
• Advanced diagnostic and treatment facilities at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) at Jhajjar
• A second campus of Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute in Kolkata
• 297 Day Care Cancer Centers (DCCCs) as promised in the Union Budget 2025-26
• Free essential medicines and diagnostics at public health facilities
• Anti-cancer drugs in the Essential Drugs List at District and Sub-Divisional Hospitals
• Health insurance of Rs. 5 lakh per family annually for secondary and tertiary care under Ayushman Bharat – Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (AB PMJAY)
• Affordable Medicines and Reliable Implants for Treatment (AMRIT) Pharmacies providing access to affordable cancer medicines.

A new vaccine that targets the mosquito-borne dengue has proven to be over 80 percent effective in preventing the risk of severe disease for up to five years, according to a recent study conducted by Brazilian researchers.

The study, published in the journal Nature Medicine, confirmed that the tetravalent dengue vaccine -- Butantan-DV -- developed by the Butantan Institute in São Paulo, prevents hospitalizations and offers broader protection against all four dengue serotypes.

“This vaccine is establishing itself as a very important tool in the fight against dengue in Brazil, with the potential to contribute to reducing the circulation of the virus, in addition to individual protection,” said Fernanda Boulos, the institute’s medical director of clinical trials.

The Phase 3 Clinical Trial

The phase 3 clinical trial, conducted from February 2016 to July 2019, involved 16,235 participants between the ages of 2 and 59.

The researchers compared individuals who received a single dose of the vaccine (10,259) with those who were administered a placebo (5,976).

• The results showed
• 80.5 percent effectiveness against severe dengue cases
• no hospitalization in the vaccinated group vs 8 cases in the placebo group
• 65 percent effective in preventing symptomatic dengue

The Butantan-DV Vaccine

The Butantan-DV vaccine is tetravalent and offers protection against the four known serotypes: DENV-1, DENV-2, DENV-3, and DENV-4.

The vaccine uses live viruses that have been “weakened” (attenuated) in a laboratory.

Once administered, the vaccine controls replication of these attenuated viruses in the body -- a process which induces the immune system to produce neutralizing antibodies specific to each of the four serotypes.

The vaccines create immunity specific to each serotype to enable the body to recognize and neutralize each variant individually.

The Butantan-DV vaccine was approved by the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (ANVISA) on November 26, 2025, for use by the Brazilian population aged 12 to 59.

The country's Ministry of Health has

• incorporated the vaccine into the national immunization program in January
• launched a pilot project to immunize 90 percent of the target population in states with high burden
• rolled out vaccination of primary care health professionals in February

Also read: Why Is Dengue Fever on the Rise Despite Vaccines?

Global Dengue Burden

Dengue is transmitted through infected mosquitoes, primarily the species Aedes aegypti.

Common Symptoms include:

• Sudden onset of high-grade fever.
• Intense headache
• Severe muscle, joint, or bone pain.
• Skin Rash that often appears 2–5 days after the fever starts
• Nausea and Vomiting
• Fatigue

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), about half of the world's population is now at risk of dengue.

It estimates that:

• about 390 million dengue infections occur annually worldwide
• nearly 100 million people develop symptoms each year

The two main authorized vaccines in the world against dengue are Dengvaxia and Qdenga.

These vaccines are designed to protect against all four serotypes of the virus, with a focus on reducing severe disease and hospitalizations.

The recent decision by the Supreme Court of India allowing withdrawal of life support for a 32-year-old man in an irreversible permanent vegetative state is an important development in patient-centered healthcare.

The order follows the principles established in the landmark Common Cause v. Union of India, which recognized passive euthanasia and affirmed that individuals have the right to die with dignity. From the perspective of a critical care specialist, this decision supports ethical medical practice while protecting the dignity and rights of patients.

In modern intensive care units (ICUs), doctors use advanced technologies such as ventilators, feeding tubes, dialysis machines, and strong medications to sustain life during serious illness. These treatments are extremely valuable when there is a reasonable chance of recovery.

However, in some medical conditions—particularly severe brain injuries—patients may enter a permanent vegetative state. In this condition, the patient’s body may continue functioning with medical support, but the brain has lost the ability to produce consciousness or awareness. The patient cannot communicate, recognize loved ones, or interact with the environment, and medical science currently has no effective treatment to reverse this condition.

From a medical standpoint, continuing life support in such cases may only prolong biological survival without any possibility of recovery or meaningful quality of life. The Supreme Court’s decision acknowledges this difficult reality and allows withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment when doctors confirm that recovery is medically impossible. This approach respects the patient’s dignity and avoids unnecessary prolongation of suffering.

Harish Rana Case: Key benefits

One of the key benefits of this judgment is the recognition of dignity at the end of life. The Court has interpreted the right to life under the Constitution of India to include the right to die with dignity. In practical terms, this means that patients should not be forced to remain on life-support machines when such treatment no longer benefits them.

Medicine should focus not only on prolonging life but also on ensuring that patients are treated with respect, comfort, and compassion during their final stages of life.

The decision also supports patient autonomy, which is a core principle of ethical medical care. Individuals have the right to make decisions about their own bodies and medical treatment. The recognition of living wills or advance directives allows patients to express their wishes in advance regarding life-prolonging treatments. This ensures that medical decisions align with the patient’s values and preferences, even if the patient is no longer able to communicate.

Also read: Harish Rana Case Highlights Why Planning For A Living Will Is Important

Another important benefit is the support it provides to families. Families often experience deep emotional stress when a loved one remains in a permanent vegetative state for a long period. They may struggle with uncertainty about whether continuing life support is truly helping the patient.

The Supreme Court’s framework provides a clear and compassionate process for decision-making involving medical boards and proper documentation. This helps families make informed choices in consultation with doctors while ensuring that the decision is ethically and legally sound.

Harish Rana Case: Offers Clarity For Healthcare Workers

The ruling also offers legal clarity for doctors and hospitals. In the past, physicians sometimes feared legal consequences if life support was withdrawn, even in medically futile situations.

The guidelines established under the Common Cause judgment create a structured and transparent process for making such decisions. This allows doctors to practice responsible and ethical medicine without unnecessary legal concerns.

Also read: Passive Euthanasia: Harish Rana’s Case May Reshape End-of-life Protocols, Say Experts

Passive Euthanasia: A Compassionate Step

In conclusion, the Supreme Court’s order is a compassionate step forward in Indian healthcare. From a critical care perspective, it respects patient dignity, supports family decision-making, provides legal clarity for doctors, and encourages thoughtful end-of-life care.

Most importantly, it reminds us that the true goal of medicine is not merely to extend life at all costs, but to ensure that every patient is treated with dignity, humanity, and respect throughout all stages of life.

Also read: Harish Rana Case Brings Spotlight On How Passive Euthanasia Has Evolved Over The Years