Heart attacks and strokes are among the leading causes of death globally, with millions suffering from cardiovascular diseases (CVD) every year. There are more than seven million people in the UK alone, with about 100,000 patients experiencing heart attacks annually. However, a group of researchers at University College London (UCL) estimate that one 'polypill' taken daily day could eliminate a majority of these cases dramatically lowering death tolls.

The proposed polypill, a combination of a statin and three blood pressure-lowering drugs, has been under study for over two decades. Experts argue that introducing this pill universally for individuals aged 50 and above could be more effective than the current NHS Health Check, which assesses risk factors every five years for those aged between 40 and 74.

Studies have repeatedly proven the effectiveness of the polypill in preventing CVD. A groundbreaking 2019 study in The Lancet found that five years' use of the polypill cut the risk of heart attack and stroke by a third. In addition, previous modelling analyses have estimated that if given universally to people over 55, the polypill might be able to prevent 80% of heart attacks and strokes.

Today, the NHS Health Check follows a risk-based model in which patients are tested for CVD risk factors and treated with drugs accordingly. Yet, as per UCL's study, this system has serious flaws:

Low Uptake: Just 40% of those eligible for the NHS Health Check choose to have it, leaving a considerable number of at-risk patients undiagnosed and untreated.

Ineffective Prediction of Risk: The majority of heart attacks and strokes happen to people at average risk levels, thus making it challenging to identify the need for intervention effectively.

Limited Effectiveness: Even at maximum take-up, the NHS Health Check programme is predicted to have fewer health impacts compared to a polypill initiative applied to the whole population.

Simplicity and Affordability of the Polypill Strategy

One of the big benefits of the polypill is that it is so easy. In contrast to the existing screening-based model, the polypill scheme would not involve complicated medical tests or lengthy risk assessments. Instead, people reaching 50 would just have to fill out a few questions to determine possible side effects before they were prescribed.

Professor Aroon Hingorani of the UCL Institute of Cardiovascular Science, one of the strongest proponents of this scheme, says:

"Finally, the time is now to do much better on prevention. A population approach would prevent a lot more heart attacks and strokes than is done today with a strategy of trying to target a smaller group only."

Aside from the possible health implications, the polypill is also an economic solution. The drugs used are off-patent, thus cheap to produce and distribute. With the vast economic cost of managing CVD-related illnesses, a preventive model could result in substantial cost-saving for the NHS in the future.

The polypill has been proven to be effective by numerous international trials. In 2019, a randomised trial in rural Iran discovered that participants who took the polypill for five years had a 34% reduced risk of having a heart attack or stroke compared to non-participants.

Likewise, modelling research has indicated that even if only 8% of people aged over 50 took up the polypill regimen, it would still be more beneficial to their health than the NHS Health Check programme.

Is This a Case of Over-Medicalisation?

One of the main objections to the polypill strategy is the suggestion that it might result in the unnecessary medicalisation of a significant proportion of the population. But, it is argued, it should be considered as a preventative measure, not as mass medication.

Professor Sir Nicholas Wald of UCL's Institute of Health Informatics explains:

"Instead of being a 'medicalisation' of a significant proportion of the population, a polypill programme is a prevention measure to prevent an individual from becoming a patient."

He compares it with public health measures like water fluoridation or compulsory seatbelts—interventions that have been shown to have a significant impact in reducing public health danger at low individual cost.

With the evidence in favour of the polypill's effectiveness and viability overwhelming, experts are calling on the NHS to act now. It is their belief that substituting the NHS Health Check with a polypill-based prevention program could be the UK government's flagship policy under its pledge to put disease prevention ahead of cure.

As Professor Hingorani points out, "The status quo is not a justifiable option." With CVD still a major cause of death globally, taking a population-wide polypill approach could be a turning point for preventative medicine, potentially saving thousands of lives annually. The question now is whether the NHS will take up this call and establish a policy with the potential to transform the prevention of cardiovascular disease on a national level.

Scientists have discovered an Achilles' heel that helps some of the most aggressive cancers escape treatment. The discovery that could pave the way for new targeted therapies against specific drug-resistant tumours.

Researchers at Nanyang Technological University (NTU) Singapore, identified a protein called TEX264 that enables cancer cells to escape the therapeutic effects of a widely used class of targeted cancer drugs known as PARP inhibitors. The study is published in Nature Cell Biology.

What Does This Mean For Drug-Resistant Cancers?

The findings could have positive implications for patients with triple-negative breast cancer, as well as ovarian, prostate, and pancreatic cancers that are treated with PARP inhibitors. These cancers eventually become resistant to the drugs.

"Our findings have identified a new biological process involving TEX264 as a key mechanism of drug resistance in an aggressive form of cancer," said Professor Kristijan Ramadan, who led the research. "We coined this new biological mechanism 'autophagy of DNA lesions', or simply 'nucleophagy'. This makes TEX264 a potential target for future cancer therapies."

Also read: Don't Fear The Biopsy, Fear The Delay

How Do Some Cancers Escape Treatment?

PARP inhibitors work by blocking PARP1, a protein that repairs damaged DNA inside cancer cells. Without this repair system, tumour cells accumulate DNA damage and die. However, many cancers eventually become resistant to this treatment.

The researchers discovered that TEX264 helps remove trapped PARP1 proteins from damaged DNA through a newly identified clean-up process called nucleophagy, allowing cancer cells to continue repairing themselves and escape the treatment. This is the cellular recycling system that makes cancer resistant to treatments.

When scientists blocked TEX264 in experiments, PARP1 remained stuck on DNA, DNA damage accumulated, and the cancer cells became far more vulnerable to therapy.

Also read: US FDA Approves New Blood Test To Screen For Colorectal Cancer

What Are PARP Inhibitors?

They are approved for several cancers, including ovarian, breast, prostate, and pancreatic cancer.

While many patients initially respond well, resistance develops in an estimated 40% to 70% of breast and ovarian cancer cases.

Also read: Scientists Find Rare Contagious Skin Cancer In Fish From US, Canada: Should Humans Worry?

Importance Of This Study

Instead of targeting the DNA repair machinery directly, the new study targets an entirely different weak spot, the cellular cycle that cancer cells exploit to discard damaged repair proteins.

Researchers believe drugs that inhibit TEX264 or block nucleophagy could potentially restore the effectiveness of existing PARP inhibitors, offering a new targeted treatment strategy for patients whose cancers no longer respond to therapy.

The researchers caution that the findings are currently based on laboratory studies, and more research, including clinical trials, will be needed before therapies targeting TEX264 can reach patients.

The promising results adds to growing efforts worldwide to overcome one of oncology's biggest challenges: preventing cancers from evolving resistance to life-saving treatments.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has updated its treatment guidelines for visceral leishmaniasis (VL), commonly known as kala-azar, and post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL).

Through this update, WHO is recommending shorter, safer and more patient-friendly treatments that could improve outcomes for thousands of patients across eastern Africa and South-East Asia.

The revised guidance marks the first major update in nearly two decades for these forms of leishmaniasis.

It introduces new treatment options, including the use of oral miltefosine in combination therapies, reducing the need for long courses of painful daily injections.

What Is PKDL?

Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) is a skin condition that appears months or years after a patient recovers from visceral leishmaniasis.

Visceral leishmaniasis, also known as kala-azar or black fever, is a life-threatening parasitic disease caused by Leishmania. It is spread by infected female sandflies. It attacks internal organs like the spleen and liver and is almost always fatal if left untreated.

In post-kala-azar, while patients usually feel well, they develop patches, papules or nodules on the skin that harbour the parasite. This allows sandflies to transmit the infection to others.

Early diagnosis and effective treatment of PKDL are therefore considered essential for interrupting transmission and elimination of kala-azar.

Also read: Uganda Declared Ebola-Free As Congo Outbreak Grows To 3,262 Cases, 1,437 Deaths

About The New Treatment Guidelines

WHO now recommends a 14-day regimen combining oral miltefosine with once-daily paromomycin injections for patients with primary visceral leishmaniasis in eastern Africa.

The new approach replaces older sodium stibogluconate-based regimens that required 17 days of treatment, 34 injections, which were often associated with toxicity.

The guidelines also introduce shorter treatment options for PKDL. For patients in eastern Africa and South-East Asia, WHO recommends new combination treatments that substantially shorten duration. It also allows part of the therapy to be completed at home.

Dr Daniel Ngamije Madandi, WHO Director of Malaria and Neglected Tropical Diseases, "For too long, patients suffering from leishmaniasis have endured treatments nearly as punishing as the disease itself. By recommending safer, shorter and more patient-friendly regimens, we are not just improving care; we are accelerating our fight to eliminate this devastating disease and offering renewed hope to communities across Africa and Asia."

Also read: Ebola Scare In The UK After Humanitarian Worker Monitored In London Hospital; Here's what Happened

Milestone In PKDL Treatment

The updated recommendations also revise the safety guidance for miltefosine in line with advice from the WHO Advisory Committee on the Safety of Medicinal Products and introduce allometric dosing to help optimise treatment across different body weights.

Kala-azar is one of the world's deadliest parasitic diseases after malaria. According to WHO, eastern Africa accounted for nearly 79% of global visceral leishmaniasis cases in 2024, with around half of patients being children under the age of 15.

Transmitted through the bite of infected female sandflies, it causes prolonged fever, weight loss, anaemia and enlargement of the spleen and liver. If left untreated, the disease is fatal in up to 95% of cases.

Maharashtra Food And Drug Administration (FDA) has taken a significant step towards promoting healthy eating habits in children. On Wednesday, FDA commissioner Tukaram Mundhe announced that foods and drinks high in fat, sugar, and salt should not be sold within 50 metres of school premises.

"Within school premises and up to 50 metres from the school compound, the sale, advertisement and free distribution of high fat, salt and sugar (HFSS) food items is completely banned by the FDA. It will be implemented strictly," Mundhe said.

Why Did Maharashtra FDA Ban The Sale Of HFSS Food Items?

HFSS food items could neither be sold, advertised, nor distributed free of cost within the prescribed limits around schools in Maharashtra anymore.

The recent ban covers popular junk food items like vada pav, samosas, deep-fried snacks, chips, cold drinks, sugary beverages, chocolates and ice cream.

Mundhe said the state government had issued a compliance order on July 27 to enforce food safety and nutritional standards across educational institutions.

He also said that the move would affect nearly two crore students studying in around 1.08 lakh schools in Maharashtra.

The guidelines would apply to all government, government-aided and private schools affiliated to any education board, meaning that no educational institution would be exempt from the ban.

Also read: No More 'Buy 1 Get 1 Free': After UK, Northern Ireland Restricts Promotion Of Unhealthy Foods To Tackle Obesity

He also said that canteens, midday meal kitchens, food suppliers and hostel kitchens catering to schools must obtain mandatory registration and licenses under food safety regulations.

He added, "No organisation or institution can prepare or supply food to schools, hostels or under the midday meal scheme without registration and a valid license to operate."

He said school principals, headmasters and local authorities would play a key role in implementing the restrictions.

According to the guidelines, the move is applicable for children from 22 months of age up to students studying in Class 12.

Experts React

Also read: Nearly 1.6 Million Dozen Eggs Recalled in US Over Potential Salmonella Contamination: FDA

HealthandMe spoke to Dr Rahul Verma, Director of Paediatrics and Neonatology at Sir H.N. Reliance Foundation Hospital, Mumbai, about the impact this move would have on children's health.

Dr Verma says that rather than viewing the decision only as a ban on junk food, it should be seen as an attempt to reshape children's food environment.

He says, "When healthier choices become the default in schools, children are more likely to develop better eating habits that can continue into adulthood. Reaching over 1.08 lakh schools and nearly 2 crore students from preschool to Class 12 gives this initiative the potential to influence an entire generation at a stage when lifelong dietary preferences are still being formed."

He also said that the policy also goes beyond simply removing HFSS foods. By making FSSAI licensing mandatory for school canteens, introducing regular compliance checks, and encouraging the inclusion of nutritious foods such as fruits, pulses, and whole grains, it creates a structured system that supports healthier eating rather than relying on restrictions alone.

In an X post, Dr. Sivaranjini, a pediatrician, suggested a different approach which seems to be a much simpler way of differentiating between healthy and unhealthy foods.

She wrote, " Front-of-pack label (FOPL) warnings are the simplest and most effective way to help people make better food choices in India. A clear “High in Sugar” or “High in Salt” or "High in Fat" warning takes seconds to understand. No calculations. No nutrition knowledge. Just a simple signal that says, 'Think twice'".

The doctor says that unhealthy, processed foods are often marketed as healthy due to misleading labels and claims on their packaging.

She added, "The problem with systems like Nutri-Score or Health Star Ratings is that they average everything into one score. A product loaded with sugar can still look “healthy” because it has added protein, fiber, or vitamins."

Providing real-life examples, she informed, "A sugary breakfast cereal still gets HIGH IN SUGAR, even if fibre and vitamins are added to it. An instant noodle high in sodium still gets HIGH IN SODIUM even if protein and vitamins are added to it. A packaged fruit juice with excessive free sugars still gets HIGH IN SUGAR, though it's directly from the fruit."

Although the move is a positive step towards protecting children's health, sustained success will depend on whether healthy food remains accessible, affordable, and appealing to children. If children continue to consume highly processed foods outside school or at home, the long-term benefits may be limited.