Heart attacks and strokes are among the leading causes of death globally, with millions suffering from cardiovascular diseases (CVD) every year. There are more than seven million people in the UK alone, with about 100,000 patients experiencing heart attacks annually. However, a group of researchers at University College London (UCL) estimate that one 'polypill' taken daily day could eliminate a majority of these cases dramatically lowering death tolls.

The proposed polypill, a combination of a statin and three blood pressure-lowering drugs, has been under study for over two decades. Experts argue that introducing this pill universally for individuals aged 50 and above could be more effective than the current NHS Health Check, which assesses risk factors every five years for those aged between 40 and 74.

Studies have repeatedly proven the effectiveness of the polypill in preventing CVD. A groundbreaking 2019 study in The Lancet found that five years' use of the polypill cut the risk of heart attack and stroke by a third. In addition, previous modelling analyses have estimated that if given universally to people over 55, the polypill might be able to prevent 80% of heart attacks and strokes.

Today, the NHS Health Check follows a risk-based model in which patients are tested for CVD risk factors and treated with drugs accordingly. Yet, as per UCL's study, this system has serious flaws:

Low Uptake: Just 40% of those eligible for the NHS Health Check choose to have it, leaving a considerable number of at-risk patients undiagnosed and untreated.

Ineffective Prediction of Risk: The majority of heart attacks and strokes happen to people at average risk levels, thus making it challenging to identify the need for intervention effectively.

Limited Effectiveness: Even at maximum take-up, the NHS Health Check programme is predicted to have fewer health impacts compared to a polypill initiative applied to the whole population.

Simplicity and Affordability of the Polypill Strategy

One of the big benefits of the polypill is that it is so easy. In contrast to the existing screening-based model, the polypill scheme would not involve complicated medical tests or lengthy risk assessments. Instead, people reaching 50 would just have to fill out a few questions to determine possible side effects before they were prescribed.

Professor Aroon Hingorani of the UCL Institute of Cardiovascular Science, one of the strongest proponents of this scheme, says:

"Finally, the time is now to do much better on prevention. A population approach would prevent a lot more heart attacks and strokes than is done today with a strategy of trying to target a smaller group only."

Aside from the possible health implications, the polypill is also an economic solution. The drugs used are off-patent, thus cheap to produce and distribute. With the vast economic cost of managing CVD-related illnesses, a preventive model could result in substantial cost-saving for the NHS in the future.

The polypill has been proven to be effective by numerous international trials. In 2019, a randomised trial in rural Iran discovered that participants who took the polypill for five years had a 34% reduced risk of having a heart attack or stroke compared to non-participants.

Likewise, modelling research has indicated that even if only 8% of people aged over 50 took up the polypill regimen, it would still be more beneficial to their health than the NHS Health Check programme.

Is This a Case of Over-Medicalisation?

One of the main objections to the polypill strategy is the suggestion that it might result in the unnecessary medicalisation of a significant proportion of the population. But, it is argued, it should be considered as a preventative measure, not as mass medication.

Professor Sir Nicholas Wald of UCL's Institute of Health Informatics explains:

"Instead of being a 'medicalisation' of a significant proportion of the population, a polypill programme is a prevention measure to prevent an individual from becoming a patient."

He compares it with public health measures like water fluoridation or compulsory seatbelts—interventions that have been shown to have a significant impact in reducing public health danger at low individual cost.

With the evidence in favour of the polypill's effectiveness and viability overwhelming, experts are calling on the NHS to act now. It is their belief that substituting the NHS Health Check with a polypill-based prevention program could be the UK government's flagship policy under its pledge to put disease prevention ahead of cure.

As Professor Hingorani points out, "The status quo is not a justifiable option." With CVD still a major cause of death globally, taking a population-wide polypill approach could be a turning point for preventative medicine, potentially saving thousands of lives annually. The question now is whether the NHS will take up this call and establish a policy with the potential to transform the prevention of cardiovascular disease on a national level.

The United States is now providing doses of an experimental Ebola treatment developed by Mapp Biopharmaceutical for clinical trials in the Democratic Republic of Congo, where a growing outbreak of the Bundibugyo strain has infected more than 1,000 people and claimed over 250 lives. The decision marks a significant shift from the U.S. government's earlier stance, which limited access to the drug to Americans considered at high risk of exposure.

Health officials are racing to find effective ways to contain the outbreak, as there are currently no approved vaccines or treatments specifically designed for the Bundibugyo strain of Ebola. A small number of cases and deaths have also been reported in neighboring Uganda, raising concerns about the disease spreading further across the region.

The experimental therapy, known as MBP134, was developed by San Diego-based Mapp Biopharmaceutical. While the U.S. had previously kept its stockpile for potential use in exposed American citizens, it is now making doses available to support clinical research in Congo. This is the first time Washington has publicly committed stockpiled supplies of the treatment for a broader international trial.

According to the World Health Organization, researchers will test MBP134 both on its own and alongside the antiviral drug remdesivir, marketed as Veklury. Remdesivir became widely known during the COVID-19 pandemic and is being evaluated to see whether it can improve outcomes when combined with the antibody treatment.

Also Read: Nutritional Foods That Help Keep Cholesterol Under Control

Ebola Situation In Western Africa

The confirmed cases in the Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) have reached the highest total ever recorded during the first month of an outbreak in Africa, according to the World Health Organization (WHO).

As of June 22, confirmed Ebola cases in Congo had risen to 1,094 and deaths to 277, according to the DRC Ministry of Health. The WHO raised concerns about the rapid spread of the deadly virus and the challenges facing containment efforts.

“This is the largest number of confirmed cases in the first month of an Ebola disease outbreak in Africa,” said Dr Abdirahman Mahamud, Director, Health Emergency Alert and Response Operations at WHO, during a press briefing in Geneva.

"What is important is we need to scale up and this outbreak is moving faster than us," he told reporters after returning from Bunia last week.

Mahamud also noted signs of hope, highlighting a quick increase in the number of Ebola beds to over 500 in the past fortnight and signs that community resistance and violent resistance to Ebola responders was beginning to abate.

As of June 24, Uganda had recorded 20 confirmed Ebola cases, including two fatalities. The latest infection was identified on June 21, with no additional cases reported afterward. Of the confirmed infections, 15 were linked to travel from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), while five resulted from local transmission. Among the nine cases with available location data, eight were detected in Kampala and one in the neighboring Wakiso District.

Chemotherapy is often considered the most challenging aspect of cancer treatment due to its wide range of side effects. However, new advances in targeted therapies may soon reduce the need for conventional chemotherapy for some breast cancer patients.

Two drugs developed by pharmaceutical giants AstraZeneca and Gilead Sciences have shown encouraging results in treating triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), one of the most aggressive and difficult-to-treat forms of the disease.

Triple-negative breast cancer lacks three key receptors commonly targeted by standard breast cancer therapies, making many conventional treatments ineffective.

In recent weeks, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved two targeted therapies—Datroway, developed by AstraZeneca in partnership with Daiichi Sankyo, and Trodelvy from Gilead Sciences—as first-line treatment options for certain patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer.

Why These Drugs Are Better Than Chemo?

Both Datroway and Trodelvy belong to a class of medicines known as antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). These therapies use antibodies to identify proteins present on most triple-negative breast cancer cells and deliver a potent dose of chemotherapy directly to the tumor.

The approach is designed to minimize damage to healthy tissues compared with traditional chemotherapy, which affects rapidly dividing cells throughout the body. Clinical trials showed that both drugs reduced the risk of disease progression by about 40% compared with standard chemotherapy, Washington Post reported.

“For seven out of 10 patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer who are not candidates for immunotherapy, chemotherapy has remained the only treatment option," said Arlene Brothers, Executive Director, Triple Negative Breast Cancer Foundation, in a statement.

The new drugs for the first time, will pave the way "for these patients will have a new standard of care beyond traditional chemotherapy at the outset of their treatment.”

Efficacy of Trodelvy And Datroway

Gilead's approval is based on two clinical trials that evaluated how effectively Trodelvy delayed tumor growth. When used alone, Trodelvy reduced the risk of tumor progression or death by 38% compared with chemotherapy in patients who were not eligible for immunotherapy.

Among patients eligible for immunotherapy—approximately 30% of all triple-negative breast cancer cases—a combination of Trodelvy and Merck's Keytruda reduced the risk of tumor progression or death by 35%.

“For more than twenty years, patients with mTNBC have had limited choices in first-line treatment. Building on its impact in second-line mTNBC, Trodelvy now offers patients a powerful new backbone therapy option in the first-line setting,” said Dietmar Berger, Chief Medical Officer, Gilead Sciences, in a statement.

Read More: Ozempic-Like Weight-Loss Drugs May Cut Breast Cancer Risk By A Third, Finds Research

In a separate clinical trial, AstraZeneca's Datroway reduced the risk of tumor progression or death by 43% compared with chemotherapy. The drug also extended median progression-free survival by five months.

“Datopotamab deruxtecan (brand name Datroway) is the first and only medicine to significantly prolong overall survival in the 1st-line setting compared to chemotherapy in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer who are not candidates for immunotherapy. This approval will bring a much-needed treatment option for these patients,” said Tiffany A. Traina, Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Clinical Research Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre, part of the study.

Burden Of Triple-negative Breast Cancer

Read To Know: More Indian Women Turning To Egg Freezing For Future Family Planning: Know The Risks And Benefits

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents about 10–15% of global breast cancer cases but accounts for a disproportionately high share of mortality. In 2025, more than 48,000 Americans were diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer.

The disease is known for its aggressive nature. On average, triple-negative breast cancer recurs or spreads within about 2½ years, compared with around five years for other forms of breast cancer. Additionally, nearly half of patients never receive a second line of treatment.

Both AstraZeneca and Gilead are now investigating their therapies in earlier stages of breast cancer.

The Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), driven by the Bundibugyo virus, continues to grow rapidly.

According to the latest government data, the number of confirmed cases in the DRC has risen to 1,118, including 291 deaths.

As of June 24, Uganda had reported 20 confirmed cases, including two deaths. The most recent case was reported on June 21, and no new cases have been recorded since.

Among the confirmed cases in Uganda, 15 had travel links to the DRC and five were linked to local transmission.

Outside Africa, France has reported a confirmed Ebola case in a doctor who returned from a humanitarian mission in Ituri province, the hardest-hit region in the DRC, with 997 confirmed cases and nearly 280 deaths.

What Makes Bundibugyo Virus Unique?

Also read: Ebola Bundibugyo Strain: All You Should Know About The Rare Virus

Bundibugyo is one of the rarest Ebola virus strains. There have been only two previous outbreaks: one in Uganda in 2007 and another in the DRC in 2012, with case fatality rates of 32% and 55%, respectively.

A key difference is that there is currently no approved vaccine for the Bundibugyo strain. Vaccines are available for the Sudan and Zaire Ebola strains, but treatment for the Bundibugyo virus remains limited to supportive care.

The Unusual Symptoms Seen in Bundibugyo Patients

In a Correspondence published in The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), researchers from the Institut National de Santé Publique in Kinshasa analyzed the clinical characteristics of Bundibugyo virus disease (BVD).

Researchers recorded symptoms in 405 patients with confirmed BVD and 516 people who tested negative.

Among confirmed BVD patients, the most common symptoms were:

• Fever (74.3%)
• Diarrhea (67.4%)
• Vomiting (66.7%)
• Headache (42.2%)
• Loss of appetite (39.5%)
• Abdominal pain (37.3%)
• Difficulty breathing (34.1%)
• Difficulty swallowing (32.8%)
• Muscle pain (23.5%)
• Joint pain (22.7%)

Notably, bleeding-related symptoms, often associated with Ebola, were relatively uncommon and were reported in only 10.4% of patients at presentation.

Bundibugyo: Symptoms That Differed Between Men and Women

Read More: Global Hantavirus Response To End On July 2: WHO

The symptom profile was largely similar across age groups and between men and women. However, fever was slightly less common among men, while headaches became less frequent with increasing age. Men were also somewhat more likely to report cough and chest pain, the researchers said.

Bundibugyo: Symptoms That Distinguished Confirmed Cases

Compared with people who tested negative, patients with confirmed BVD were much more likely to experience gastrointestinal and systemic symptoms.

• Vomiting: 66.7% vs. 50.8%
• Diarrhea: 67.4% vs. 49.6%
• Loss of appetite: 39.5% vs. 17.2%
• Abdominal pain: 37.3% vs. 16.3%
• Difficulty breathing: 34.1% vs. 10.9%
• Difficulty swallowing: 32.8% vs. 10.7%
• Fever: 74.3% vs. 64.9%

How Was The Study Conducted

The researchers reviewed 2,351 recorded cases in the individual-level database for BVD between May 3 and June 8, 2026.

Of these, 505 patients (21.5%) had laboratory-confirmed BVD based on PCR testing, while 635 patients (27.0%) who were suspected of having the disease tested negative.

Researchers noted that patients with confirmed BVD were demographically similar to those who tested negative. In both groups, most patients were adults aged 20 to 39 years, and women slightly outnumbered men.

Higher Viral Load Linked to Death

Among 253 patients with laboratory-confirmed infection tested using the RADIONE PCR assay in Bunia, Ituri Province, researchers found that patients who died generally had lower cycle-threshold (Ct) values, indicating a higher viral load, than those who survived.

Among 129 patients with available symptom-onset and sample-collection dates, the mean delay between symptom onset and testing was 7.4 days, with a median delay of 4.8 days.

Earlier diagnosis and treatment could improve survival rates and help reduce virus transmission within communities, the researchers said.