A new study has found that a combination of two drugs could enhance the immune system to treat one of the most common types of cancer in the world, bowel cancer. Also known as colorectal cancer, despite its widespread presence, the treatment options for this condition are limited. What the study specifically found was that this procedure could shrink the tumours caused by this condition by around 60%.

What Are The Drugs Involved

The trial involved the use of two immunotherapy drugs, botancilimab and balstilumab. It is a monoclonal antibody that works to stimulate the body's immune system to attack cancer. The study is a rather significant find, as it’s the first time that a consistent and durable response to immunotherapy has been reported in patients with solid MSS mCRC tumours.

The study was divided into several phases for more than 6 months. In the US trial, around around 101 patients with microsatile stable metastatic colorectal (MSS-mCRC) tumours showed a decrease . Around 61% of the patients experienced tumour shrinkage or stabilization after combined treatment with votancilumab and balstilumab. When it comes to downsides, diarrhea and fatigue were found to be the most common side effects or side effects of this drug.

These results are interesting and open to exploration. To date, immunotherapy has not been effective in patients with CNS-mCRC tumors. This study demonstrates the potential of the combination of botenlimab and balstilimab in the treatment of CNS mCRC, providing new hope for people diagnosed with colon cancer.

What Could This Mean For Bowel Cancer Treatment In The Future

The study is currently in the final stages of clinical trials, and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) hopes to quickly gain approval for its use because of the importance of this area that affects many people. The efficiency shown demonstrates the potential of botansilimab to contribute to broad antitumor immunity.

All in all, the combination of botensilimab and balstilimab represents a promising new direction in the treatment of colorectal cancer. This breakthrough could improve conditions for many patients worldwide and lights a new hope in the fight against this common disease. The results of this study show the effectiveness of immunotherapy in this field and how its potential to transform cancer treatment can only grow in the years to come.

A child recently died in Lewis County amid an ongoing measles outbreak, marking New York state's first measles-related death in more than 30 years. The New York State Department of Health and Lewis County Public Health confirmed the death in a joint statement on November 2.

Officials did not release more information about the child or the circumstances surrounding the death to protect the family's privacy.

The death comes as measles cases continue to rise across the United States. New York had recorded 178 cases in 2026 as of October 24, including eight in New York City, according to health officials.

Last month, Governor Kathy Hochul declared a state disaster emergency. The order gave registered nurses the authority to order specimen collection and testing for measles cases.

US Reports More Than 4,800 Measles Cases In 2026

Also read: EXCLUSIVE: Ex-CDC Vaccine Advisor Says Measles Outbreak Bigger Than Reported, Slams RFK Jr’s ‘No-See Evil’ Approach

The outbreak in New York is part of a wider resurgence of measles across the country. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported 4,852 confirmed cases as of October 29, 2026, the highest annual total since 1991.

In an exclusive interview with HealthandMe, Dr Paul Offit, paediatrician and director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and former member of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, said that the reported number of measles cases in the US could underestimate the actual scale of transmission. “You can assume that's off by a factor of at least five."

The CDC said 96% of confirmed cases this year were linked to outbreaks. It has also reported that at least 96% of cases have occurred among people who were unvaccinated.

Declining vaccination coverage has contributed to the growing measles transmission. During the 2025-2026 school year, 92.4% of US kindergarteners had received the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine, below the 95% coverage level generally needed to maintain community protection.

When Can Measles Become Life-Threatening?

Also read: 'It’s The Best-Studied Vaccine In Human History': Former CDC Adviser Busts Common Myths About COVID Vaccines

Measles is a highly contagious viral infection that spreads through the air when an infected person coughs or sneezes. The virus can remain infectious in the air for up to two hours after an infected person has left a space.

Early symptoms include high fever, cough, runny nose and red, watery eyes. Small white spots called Koplik spots may appear inside the mouth, followed by a rash that begins on the face and spreads down the body.

While many people recover, measles can cause serious complications, including pneumonia and encephalitis, or inflammation of the brain. These complications can lead to hospitalisation and, in some cases, death. Young children, pregnant women and people with weakened immune systems are vulnerable to the illness.

MMR Vaccine Is The Best Protection Against Measles

The CDC recommends two doses of the MMR vaccine. The first is given between 12 and 15 months of age, while the second is recommended between four and six years.

One dose is approximately 93% effective against measles infection, while two doses are about 97% effective, according to the CDC.

Infants aged six to 11 months who live in or are travelling to areas with a high risk of measles exposure may be advised to receive an early dose. However, this dose does not replace the two routine doses recommended after the child's first birthday..

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted tentative approval to Dr. Reddy's Laboratories for the first generic version of lenacapavir, a long-acting injectable for HIV prevention. The development raises hopes of making HIV prevention more affordable in 120 low- and middle-income countries, including India.

The approval is considered “tentative”, the FDA’s standard designation for generics while the originator remains under patent.

The development comes just 16 months after Gilead Sciences received approval for its original product, marking one of the fastest timelines for a major HIV innovation.

Lenacapavir is the first twice-yearly injectable pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) option for HIV prevention. Dr. Reddy's generic injection is expected to cost US$40 per person annually across the 120 eligible countries, with initial supplies expected by the end of 2026.

Calling it “a moment of immense pride”, Deepak Sapra, Chief Executive Officer, API and Services, at Dr. Reddy's, said the FDA approval validates the company's efforts to expand access to twice-yearly HIV prevention across low- and middle-income countries.

Also read: South Africa Receives 1st Batch Of HIV Prevention Medicine Lenacapavir

Dr Reddy's First Of 6 Generic Drugmakers To Get FDA Nod

In October 2024, Gilead Sciences signed voluntary licensing agreements with six generic manufacturers to produce and supply low-cost versions of lenacapavir in 120 low- and middle-income countries.

The six manufacturers are:

• Dr. Reddy's Laboratories (India)
• Emcure Pharmaceuticals (India)
• Hetero Labs (India)
• Eva Pharma (Egypt)
• Ferozsons Laboratories (Pakistan)
• Mylan (a subsidiary of Viatris)

Dr. Reddy's is the first among the six licensees to receive tentative US FDA approval. The other five companies are at various stages of product development, bioequivalence testing and regulatory filing.

What Will Cheaper Lenacapavir Mean For India?

At its August 11, 2026, meeting, the Indian drug regulator's Subject Expert Committee recommended waiving local Phase III clinical trials and bioequivalence studies for generic injectable lenacapavir applications submitted by Dr. Reddy's and Emcure Pharmaceuticals for PrEP.

The proposed price of approximately US$40 per person annually could make twice-yearly HIV prevention more accessible.

However, this is an indicative price for generic supplies, not a confirmed retail price in India. The eventual Indian price will depend on regulatory approval, manufacturing costs, supply capacity, competition and distribution.

Read More: Exclusive With Leading HIV Expert: What's Driving Rising HIV Cases Among India's Youth And How To Prevent It

What Does The Approval Mean For HIV Prevention?

Generic lenacapavir could offer people at risk of HIV an alternative to daily oral PrEP pills. Its twice-yearly dosing may help those who struggle with daily medication adherence or face stigma and barriers to healthcare access.

“For someone at risk of HIV, taking a pill every day to prevent a disease they do not have is a hard thing to ask. Two injections a year of a product that is almost 100% effective at preventing HIV changes that entirely.”

“Generic lenacapavir has the potential to transform HIV prevention, and this is a significant milestone, but an affordable drug alone is not enough,” said Professor Saiqa Mullick, Director of Implementation Science at Wits RHI, University of the Witwatersrand, which partnered with Dr. Reddy's.

Lenacapavir: How Does It Work?

Lenacapavir is a long-acting antiretroviral drug developed by Gilead. For HIV prevention, it is administered as two injections in the abdomen, providing protection for six months.

People must test negative for HIV before receiving it. The drug does not treat existing HIV infections or prevent other sexually transmitted infections.

Two major clinical trials demonstrated its high efficacy. In one study involving adolescent girls and young women in South Africa and Uganda, there were zero new HIV infections among participants who received lenacapavir. A second trial involving gay men and gender-diverse individuals also demonstrated high efficacy with twice-yearly injections.

Increasing consumption of caffeinated energy drinks and stimulant-containing supplements has been linked to a higher frequency of reported serious cardiovascular events, including cardiac arrest, heart attacks and abnormal heart rhythms, particularly among young adults, according to preliminary research.

The findings, based on an analysis of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) safety reports, will be presented at the American Heart Association's (AHA) Scientific Sessions 2026, scheduled for November 6-9 in Chicago.

Researchers found that cardiac arrest was reported about 11 times more frequently in connection with caffeine- and

stimulant-containing products than products without these ingredients.

Energy Drinks And Heart Problems: What Did The Study Find?

Researchers analyzed 28,345 reports of possible adverse events submitted to an FDA safety database between 2017 and 2025. Of these, 854 involved energy drinks and supplements containing caffeine or other stimulants.

Key findings included:

• Cardiac arrest was reported about 11 times more frequently with caffeine- and stimulant-containing products.
• Heart attacks were 4.5 times more likely to appear in these reports.
• Ventricular arrhythmias and heart palpitations were reported about four times more frequently.
• Elevated heart rate was reported nearly three times more frequently.
• Chest pain was reported 2.71 times more frequently, while fainting was reported about twice as frequently.

About 45% of reports involving cardiovascular events and these products concerned adults aged 18 to 34. Similar patterns were observed among men and women.

Also read: FSSAI Targets 6 Energy Drink Brands; Experts Link Them to Obesity, Liver Problems

Why Are Energy Drinks Raising Concerns?

Sales of caffeinated energy drinks have more than doubled over the past decade, reaching over $20 billion in 2024.

According to the AHA's 2026 scientific statement on caffeine and cardiovascular disease, consuming up to 400 mg of caffeine daily is generally safe for most adults.

However, some energy drinks contain up to three times more caffeine per fluid ounce than brewed coffee. Certain pre-workout supplements contain more than 12 times as much.

High caffeine intake has been associated with cardiovascular harm. Healthcare professionals have also reported cases of arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death following consumption of these products, including among young adults without known heart disease.

Why Are Young Adults Particularly Affected?

Researchers do not yet know why young adults account for such a large proportion of the cardiovascular event reports.

Possible explanations include frequent consumption, using these products before intense exercise, combining them with alcohol or other drugs, and undiagnosed heart conditions.

"These products are marketed as everyday pick-me-ups and sold next to soda and bottled water, so most people assume they carry no real risk," said study author Sai Samayamanthula, a fourth-year medical student at the University of Virginia School of Medicine.

He cautioned that regular consumers could quickly exceed recommended daily caffeine limits.

The researchers recommended better safety monitoring and urged healthcare professionals to ask younger patients experiencing palpitations, chest pain or fainting about their energy drink and stimulant supplement consumption.

Do Energy Drinks Cause Cardiac Arrest?

Read More: Excessive Energy Drinks Damaging Young Adults’ Livers, Experts Warn

The findings indicate an association, not proof that energy drinks cause cardiac arrest or other cardiovascular conditions.

Gregory M. Marcus, chair of the AHA's 2026 scientific statement on caffeine and cardiovascular disease, said the research raises concerns about products containing very high amounts of caffeine.

"Although there are biological reasons why that connection could be possible, the study does not prove that caffeine products cause these events, because other factors may have influenced the results," said Marcus, who was not involved in the study, and a professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine.

What Are The Study's Limitations?

The study relied on voluntary reports submitted to the FDA by consumers, healthcare professionals and manufacturers. Researchers could not determine how many people consumed these products without experiencing adverse events or how many cardiovascular events went unreported.