Singer Jesy Nelson recently shared an emotional update regarding the complications she is experiencing in her pregnancy with twin babies. Former Little Mix singer Jesy, who is having twins with partner Zion Foster, announced that she has been diagnosed with pre-twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (pre-TTTS). The condition, which is present in pregnancies involving twins with a shared placenta, has serious risks involved and needs intense medical supervision. As Nelson embarks on this difficult journey, her story enlightens us about a rare but dangerous condition many expectant parents may not know much about.
Twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome is a rare but dangerous condition that arises in monochorionic twin pregnancies, in which identical twins share a single placenta. The placenta supplies the developing babies with oxygen, nutrients, and blood flow, but in TTTS, there is an imbalance of blood vessels that interconnect the twins, and thus the vital resources are not evenly distributed. One twin, or the donor twin, shares excess blood with the other, referred to as the recipient twin. This leads to one baby becoming malnourished and possibly anemic, and the other in danger of heart problems due to too much blood.
Nelson described her diagnosis in a heartfelt Instagram video, explaining that she is currently in the pre-stage of TTTS and undergoing frequent monitoring. "I am being scanned twice a week, and each time, things have gotten a little worse," she shared, expressing her fears and hopes for the health of her babies.
If left untreated, TTTS can have devastating consequences. Medical research indicates that:
TTTS usually advances in stages, beginning with minimal changes in fluid levels and worsening as one twin continues to get an unequal share of blood. In extreme cases, fetal laser surgery, referred to as the Solomon technique, can be employed to divide the blood vessels and balance the twins.
Identical twins may develop differently, and their own unique form of placental sharing can have a dramatic effect on pregnancy risk. Jesy Nelson's twins are considered monochorionic diamniotic (mono/di), which means they share a placenta but have two amniotic sacs. This is the type of pregnancy in about 70% of identical twin pregnancies and carries an increased risk of complications like TTTS, umbilical cord entanglement, and growth restriction.
Conversely, dichorionic diamniotic (di/di) twins both have a separate placenta and amniotic sac, which greatly diminishes the threat of TTTS. Twin pregnancy type is normally identified by early ultrasound, with physicians being able to track future complications from inception.
Twin pregnancies, even without the presence of TTTS, entail a variety of health risks to the mother as well as infants:
Over 60% of twin pregnancies end in premature delivery, with birth usually taking place before 37 weeks. Premature infants can have immature organs and need neonatal intensive care (NICU) assistance to assist with breathing, feeding, and infection fighting.
Pregnant women with multiples are at increased risk of having high blood pressure during pregnancy. This, if left untreated, can result in preeclampsia, a serious complication of pregnancy that can result in damage to organs, preterm labor, and in some cases, maternal or fetal death.
Pregnant women carrying multiples are twice as likely to experience anemia, a condition where the body does not produce enough healthy red blood cells. This can lead to fatigue, dizziness, and complications during delivery.
According to John Hopkins Medicine, multiple birth babies are twice as likely to have congenital abnormalities compared to single births. These can include heart defects, neural tube defects, and gastrointestinal issues.
When twins have to share a placenta, they are more likely to have polyhydramnios (excess amniotic fluid) or oligohydramnios (not enough amniotic fluid). Both result in distress to the babies during fetal development and can result in premature labor.
Twins are at increased risk of excessive postpartum hemorrhage because their uterus is larger and there are greater blood supply needs.
Jesy Nelson's openness about her challenging experience is raising awareness for TTTS, a condition that few individuals—let alone expectant mothers and fathers—might be aware of. Through her tearful video, Nelson stressed the significance of knowing about twin pregnancies aside from the thrill of having multiples. "We had no idea that this type of thing occurs when you're having twins. We just desperately want to make people aware of this because there are so many people who aren't aware."
Her case reminds us of the intricacies involved in twin pregnancy and the significance of early identification and medical management. For mothers carrying twins, frequent ultrasounds and vigilance can become a life-and-death issue for early detection and better outcomes of both babies.
Through constant medical attention and care, she and her partner Zion Foster remain positive and get ready for their babies to be born. In other parents whose situations are no different, the story of Nelson highlights awareness, medical progress, and emotional encouragement in handling complicated pregnancies.
The expecting parents of twin siblings are advised to discuss TTTS screening and possible interventions with their physicians to give their babies the best chance.
Credit: iStock
The sudden collapse and death of a nine-year-old girl inside her Delhi classroom following a cardiac arrest has raised concerns about sudden cardiac emergencies in children. The Class 3 student reportedly collapsed shortly after returning to the classroom from a games period.
CCTV footage showed her entering the classroom, holding her waist and falling to the floor. A teacher rushed to help her, while school staff took her to a nearby hospital. She was subsequently taken to another hospital in Nirman Vihar, where doctors declared her dead.
Speaking to HealthandMe, Dr Neeraj Awasthy, Senior Director, Pediatric Cardiology, Fortis Hospital, Okhla, said the heart condition in children are extremely rare and differ from those in adults.
"In adults, a heart attack is usually caused by a blockage in the arteries supplying the heart. In children, sudden cardiac arrest is more often associated with an underlying heart condition, such as a structural abnormality, an inherited problem affecting the heart rhythm or inflammation of the heart muscle," he said.
According to Dr Awasthy, sudden cardiac arrest in children is commonly associated with structural heart abnormalities, inherited rhythm disorders and inflammation of the heart muscle.
In a post on X, Dr Sudhir Kumar, Neurologist at Apollo Hospitals, Hyderabad, identified other conditions that can trigger cardiac arrest in apparently healthy children:
Some children may have no symptoms until a life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia occurs, he noted.
Nearly one in five sudden cardiac deaths in young people may have a definite genetic explanation, according to scientist Vinod Scaria.
In a post on X, he identified three groups of inherited conditions linked to this risk:
An analysis of Indian genomes found variants associated with channelopathies in approximately 1% of individuals, cardiomyopathies in more than 1.5% and familial hypercholesterolaemia in about one in 150 individuals, Scaria said.
A molecular autopsy can identify genetic causes that a conventional autopsy may miss. Since many of these conditions are inherited in an autosomal dominant manner, up to half of first-degree relatives could carry the same genetic variant.
People with a family history of unexplained sudden death or inherited heart disease should seek genetic counselling.
Read More: Energy Drinks Linked To More Heart Problems In Young Adults: Study Flags Cardiac Risks
Dr Awasthy and Dr Kumar highlighted the following warning signs:
Dr Kumar said immediate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and access to an automated external defibrillator (AED) can save a child's life if they collapse and are unresponsive or not breathing normally. He also outlined the steps teachers and bystanders should take:
For a school-age child, he advised:
Dr Kumar recommended that schools:
Credit: AI
An experimental gene therapy has shown tremendous potential in reducing the frequency of seizures in three patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.
The results have raised hopes for a new approach to treating epilepsy patients who do not respond to conventional anti-seizure medications.
All three participants experienced a reduction of more than 90% in their monthly seizure frequency after the treatment. No serious side effects were reported during the study.
The results were reported today in The New England Journal of Medicine by Yang Dai, a neurosurgeon at Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University in Beijing, and his colleagues.
“It’s exciting that there’s such a dramatic effect, and that they see very few side effects,” says Matthew Walker, a neurologist at University College London who was not associated with the study.
The treatment uses a modified virus called adeno-associated virus 9 (AAV9) to deliver genetic instructions directly into the part of the brain from where seizures stem.
The virus carries a gene that instructs specific neurons, known as excitatory neurons, to produce a receptor that are sensitive to a particular medication.
Once the gene is delivered, patients take clozapine, which is an antipsychotic medication. The drug activates the receptors, reducing the activity of the neurons and helping suppress the electrical signals that cause seizures.
Researchers describe the medication as a kind of dimmer switch because it allows them to adjust the activity of the genetically modified brain cells.
Unlike conventional gene therapies, this approach gives researchers a way to regulate the treatment using medication.
The study was led by neurosurgeon Yang Dai of Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, in Beijing.
It involved three adults with drug-resistant epilepsy caused by hippocampal sclerosis, a condition in which scarring develops in the hippocampus, a brain region involved in memory and seizure activity.
All three participants had experienced epilepsy for 10 to 25 years. Despite trying at least two anti-seizure medications, their seizures still remained out of control.
They also experienced at least two seizures per month on average during the three months before entering the trial.
After gene therapy all three participants saw a reduction of more than 90% in their monthly seizure frequency.
Also read: Can ChatGPT Replace Your Doctor? Why Epilepsy Patients Should Never Alter Medication on AI Advice
Epilepsy is a neurological disorder characterised by recurrent seizures caused by abnormal electrical activity in the brain.
Anti-seizure medications can help many people control their seizures. However, some patients continue to experience seizures despite trying multiple medications.
This is known as drug-resistant epilepsy. According to the International League Against Epilepsy, it generally refers to a failure to achieve control of seizure after sufficient trials of two anti-seizure medications.
Surgery may be an option for patients with focal epilepsy if doctors can identify the brain region responsible for seizures.
The new gene therapy takes a different approach by targeting the neurons responsible for seizures.
However, experts have raised concerns about the long-term use of clozapine. High doses of the drug have been associated with cardiovascular complications and other adverse effects.
Despite the reduction in seizures, researchers have warned against interpreting the findings as proof that the treatment is effective for all people with epilepsy.
The trial involved only three participants, making it too small to probe the treatment’s long-term safety or effectiveness.
All three also had a specific form of epilepsy related to hippocampal scarring on one side of the brain. The findings cannot automatically be applied to people with other forms of epilepsy or seizures originating in different brain regions.
Credit: iStock
More than a quarter of Americans (28%) misrepresented symptoms to obtain antibiotics for themselves, while 27% did so to get antibiotics for a child in their care, according to an alarming survey.
The nationwide survey of nearly 1,000 people, published in JAMA Network Open, found that common reasons included feeling very sick, believing antibiotics were the only effective treatment and needing to recover quickly to return to work or school.
The findings highlight the need for better communication between doctors and patients so that concerns are heard and symptoms are appropriately treated, whether or not antibiotics are needed.
“Now that we have a clearer picture of how common these behaviors are and the reasons behind them, the next step is to look at strategies that help patients express their preferences and communicate what they’re feeling to their provider, and for their provider to hear them, understand their concerns, and reassure them,” said Alistair Thorpe, research assistant professor of population health sciences at the University of Utah Health and one of the study's first authors.
Also read: AI-Created Virus Injected Into A Human For The First Time To Fight Antibiotic Resistance
Among respondents, 28% said they had deliberately exaggerated or fabricated symptoms to obtain antibiotics for themselves, while 27% had done so for a child in their care.
The most common reason was feeling that they or their child were very sick and believing antibiotics were the only treatment that could help.
“It is a tough situation,” Thorpe said. “People are experiencing unpleasant symptoms, and they can have this strong feeling that antibiotics are the only thing that can help them feel better. Being told to just rest and wait is a hard thing to do, and if you think there’s something that could make you feel better, it’s a very hard impulse to override.”
Other reasons included needing to recover quickly to return to work or school and wanting greater control over treatment decisions.
Antibiotics treat bacterial infections but do not work against viral infections, which commonly cause cold- and flu-like symptoms. They can also cause side effects.
“These medications are not totally benign for the patient,” explained Andrea Levy, Professor of social sciences at Connecticut State Community College Middlesex and one of the study's first authors. “And antibiotic use contributes to increasing antimicrobial resistance, which is a broader public health concern.”
Unnecessary antibiotic use contributes to antimicrobial resistance (AMR), making bacterial infections harder to treat.
Accurate symptom reporting is therefore important. Doctors need a clear picture of a patient's symptoms to determine whether antibiotics are necessary and avoid prescribing them when they are unlikely to help.
Read More: 98 Years After Penicillin: Are We Running Out Of Effective Antibiotics?
Children commonly receive antibiotics for infections such as ear infections and respiratory illnesses. However, many childhood infections are caused by viruses, against which antibiotics are ineffective.
Unnecessary antibiotic exposure can cause side effects, including diarrhoea, nausea and allergic reactions. It can also contribute to antimicrobial resistance, making future bacterial infections harder to treat.
Repeated antibiotic use may also disrupt the developing gut microbiome, which plays a role in digestion and immune function.
The researchers emphasise that the findings are not intended to blame patients or caregivers.
“There are very understandable reasons that we can sympathize with about why patients might feel the need to misrepresent symptoms, or why caregivers might do so on behalf of their children,” Levy said. “We’re simply saying: perhaps there’s a better way.”
Past experiences with healthcare providers may influence these decisions. People were more likely to exaggerate symptoms if a doctor had previously dismissed or downplayed their concerns.
Another factor is the mistaken belief that antibiotics helped someone recover from an earlier viral infection. Since viral infections usually resolve on their own, patients may incorrectly attribute their recovery to antibiotics rather than the body's natural healing process, Thorpe explained.
The findings highlight the need for better communication between doctors and patients.
Healthcare providers need to reassure patients that their symptoms are being heard and taken seriously, even when antibiotics are not appropriate.
© $2026 Times Horizon Private Limited