Singer Jesy Nelson recently shared an emotional update regarding the complications she is experiencing in her pregnancy with twin babies. Former Little Mix singer Jesy, who is having twins with partner Zion Foster, announced that she has been diagnosed with pre-twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (pre-TTTS). The condition, which is present in pregnancies involving twins with a shared placenta, has serious risks involved and needs intense medical supervision. As Nelson embarks on this difficult journey, her story enlightens us about a rare but dangerous condition many expectant parents may not know much about.

Twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome is a rare but dangerous condition that arises in monochorionic twin pregnancies, in which identical twins share a single placenta. The placenta supplies the developing babies with oxygen, nutrients, and blood flow, but in TTTS, there is an imbalance of blood vessels that interconnect the twins, and thus the vital resources are not evenly distributed. One twin, or the donor twin, shares excess blood with the other, referred to as the recipient twin. This leads to one baby becoming malnourished and possibly anemic, and the other in danger of heart problems due to too much blood.

Nelson described her diagnosis in a heartfelt Instagram video, explaining that she is currently in the pre-stage of TTTS and undergoing frequent monitoring. "I am being scanned twice a week, and each time, things have gotten a little worse," she shared, expressing her fears and hopes for the health of her babies.

Potential Risks of TTTS

If left untreated, TTTS can have devastating consequences. Medical research indicates that:

• 90% of the cases of untreated TTTS lead to loss of one or both twins.
• Despite treatment, only a 70% survival rate for both twins is assured.
• Severe forms can result in preterm labor, cardiac failure in the recipient twin, and organ failure in the donor twin.
• Complications in long-term survivors include neurological damage and developmental delay in surviving infants.

TTTS usually advances in stages, beginning with minimal changes in fluid levels and worsening as one twin continues to get an unequal share of blood. In extreme cases, fetal laser surgery, referred to as the Solomon technique, can be employed to divide the blood vessels and balance the twins.

Why Identical Twin Pregnancies Are More Complicated

Identical twins may develop differently, and their own unique form of placental sharing can have a dramatic effect on pregnancy risk. Jesy Nelson's twins are considered monochorionic diamniotic (mono/di), which means they share a placenta but have two amniotic sacs. This is the type of pregnancy in about 70% of identical twin pregnancies and carries an increased risk of complications like TTTS, umbilical cord entanglement, and growth restriction.

Conversely, dichorionic diamniotic (di/di) twins both have a separate placenta and amniotic sac, which greatly diminishes the threat of TTTS. Twin pregnancy type is normally identified by early ultrasound, with physicians being able to track future complications from inception.

Other Twin Pregnancy Health Risks

Twin pregnancies, even without the presence of TTTS, entail a variety of health risks to the mother as well as infants:

1. Premature Birth

Over 60% of twin pregnancies end in premature delivery, with birth usually taking place before 37 weeks. Premature infants can have immature organs and need neonatal intensive care (NICU) assistance to assist with breathing, feeding, and infection fighting.

2. Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia

Pregnant women with multiples are at increased risk of having high blood pressure during pregnancy. This, if left untreated, can result in preeclampsia, a serious complication of pregnancy that can result in damage to organs, preterm labor, and in some cases, maternal or fetal death.

3. Anemia

Pregnant women carrying multiples are twice as likely to experience anemia, a condition where the body does not produce enough healthy red blood cells. This can lead to fatigue, dizziness, and complications during delivery.

4. Birth Defects

According to John Hopkins Medicine, multiple birth babies are twice as likely to have congenital abnormalities compared to single births. These can include heart defects, neural tube defects, and gastrointestinal issues.

5. Amniotic Fluid Imbalances

When twins have to share a placenta, they are more likely to have polyhydramnios (excess amniotic fluid) or oligohydramnios (not enough amniotic fluid). Both result in distress to the babies during fetal development and can result in premature labor.

6. Postpartum Hemorrhage

Twins are at increased risk of excessive postpartum hemorrhage because their uterus is larger and there are greater blood supply needs.

Jesy Nelson's openness about her challenging experience is raising awareness for TTTS, a condition that few individuals—let alone expectant mothers and fathers—might be aware of. Through her tearful video, Nelson stressed the significance of knowing about twin pregnancies aside from the thrill of having multiples. "We had no idea that this type of thing occurs when you're having twins. We just desperately want to make people aware of this because there are so many people who aren't aware."

Her case reminds us of the intricacies involved in twin pregnancy and the significance of early identification and medical management. For mothers carrying twins, frequent ultrasounds and vigilance can become a life-and-death issue for early detection and better outcomes of both babies.

Through constant medical attention and care, she and her partner Zion Foster remain positive and get ready for their babies to be born. In other parents whose situations are no different, the story of Nelson highlights awareness, medical progress, and emotional encouragement in handling complicated pregnancies.

The expecting parents of twin siblings are advised to discuss TTTS screening and possible interventions with their physicians to give their babies the best chance.

The COVID-19 pandemic did more than overwhelm global healthcare systems. It also disrupted timely care for people experiencing strokes.

Published in European Medical Journal, a global review of 107 studies has found that patients delayed hospital visits, stroke-related hospital admissions fell and treatment became harder to access during the pandemic.

The review, which examined research published between December 2019 and September 2024, looked at how the pandemic affected stroke care from the moment symptoms began through hospital treatment and recovery. Researchers initially screened 1,405 studies before including 107 in their analysis.

Stroke Patients Delayed Going To Hospital

One of the alarming patterns among stroke victims was a delay in seeking medical help. People experiencing stroke symptoms were reluctant to go to hospitals because they feared catching COVID-19 or believed healthcare facilities were already overwhelmed.

The delay was particularly noticeable among people with milder stroke symptoms; some of whom reached hospitals after critical treatment windows had passed.

The findings are a cause of concern as stroke treatment is extremely time-sensitive. Delays can prevent patients from seeking timely treatments to restore blood flow to the brain.

Also read: Surgeon In Gurugram, Patient In Hyderabad: Could Robotic Telesurgery Bring Specialists To Smaller Cities?

Stroke Admissions Declined

Several studies included in the review reported a decline in stroke admissions during the pandemic. One study found a 31% decrease in monthly admissions for ischaemic stroke, while another reported a 44% reduction.

The drop did not mean fewer people were having strokes. Instead, researchers found evidence that some patients may simply have avoided or delayed seeking emergency care.

When patients did reach hospitals, several studies found they were more likely to have more severe strokes than patients treated before the pandemic.

Also read: Innovations in Structural Heart Care: The Shift Towards Minimally Invasive Therapies

Stroke Treatment Was Delayed Inside Hospitals

The disruption was not limited to patients' decisions about when to seek help. Hospitals had to reorganise resources and reassign staff towards COVID-19 response. These changes affected stroke services and contributed to delays in treatment.

The review also identified increases in both symptom-to-door time, the period between stroke symptoms beginning and reaching hospital, and door-to-treatment time, the period between arriving at hospital and receiving treatment to restore blood flow. Ambulance services also faced additional pressure during the pandemic.

Also read: 'Heart Attack Of The Leg': Women May Overlook This Leg Symptom That Signals Blocked Arteries & Heart Risk

Delays Affected Stroke Recovery

The review found evidence that the disruption was associated with poorer outcomes for some stroke patients. One study reported significantly greater disability at discharge during the pandemic, with a median modified Rankin Scale score of 4 compared with 2 before the pandemic. The difference remained at three months after the stroke.

Another analysis reported higher mortality at discharge among patients treated during the pandemic, at 7.7% compared with 2.5% in a pre-pandemic group.

Role Of Telemedicine In Stroke Care During Pandemic

Telemedicine refers to seeking healthcare remotely using technology, without the doctor and patient needing to be in the same physical location.

Telemedicine helped maintain some continuity of stroke care during the pandemic, but access was not even everywhere.

The review found that younger patients were more likely to use remote healthcare services, while older adults didn't.

This raises concerns about whether telemedicine can adequately support people who may have greater healthcare needs but face barriers to digital access.

The researchers added that said future preparedness should focus on keeping stroke services accessible, ensuring equitable access to telemedicine and educating patients about the need to seek emergency care promptly.

A few extra minutes during an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy may help doctors detect more gastric cancers and precancerous alternations, according to research recently discussed at the World Congress of Gastroenterology (WCOG) 2026 in New Delhi.

At WCOG, it was discussed that the quality and duration of an endoscopic examination can influence the chances of finding early cancer. An inspection time of an additional at least seven minutes was linked with about 3.4 times higher detection of gastric cancer and dysplasia.

The finding comes as gastrointestinal cancers continue to increase, contributing to a growing global health burden. GI cancers currently account for around one in four cancer cases and one in three cancer deaths worldwide. The overall burden of the disease is projected to nearly double by 2050.

Dr. Pramod Garg, Professor & Head, Department of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition, AIIMS, New Delhi; President, Indian Society of Gastroenterology and Co-Chair, Steering Committee, WCOG 2026, said, “Earlier detection depends on both identifying people at risk and ensuring that diagnostic procedures are performed to the highest possible standard. High-quality endoscopy can create an important opportunity to identify disease at a stage when intervention can make a greater difference.”

Could Endoscopy Time Affect Cancer Detection?

Also read: WCOG 2026: How Infections, Metabolic Disease Are Changing Digestive Health

An upper gastrointestinal endoscopy allows doctors to examine the lining of the oesophagus, stomach, and upper part of the small intestine using a flexible camera device.

Simply inserting the scope and looking quickly may not be enough to identify subtle abnormalities. A more systematic examination allows the endoscopist more time to examine the stomach lining, identify suspicious areas, improve mucosal visualisation and document findings accordingly.

The WCOG discussion therefore puts focus on not just whether endoscopy is performed, but also on how long and how well it is performed.

The reported 3.4 times association highlights the value of a careful, detailed examination that could help detect changes related to cancer early, prompting timely treatment.

Also read: Fatty Liver, Chronic Gut Diseases And Worm Infections: India’s Changing Disease Burden

India's GI Cancer Burden

The changes in India's gastrointestinal cancer burden were also discussed, including growing concern around early-onset colorectal cancer. Researchers are examining whether genetics, environmental exposures and changes in the gut microbiome could be contributing to colorectal cancer appearing at younger ages.

WCOG 2026 also included concerns related gallbladder cancer, liver cancer and the rising role of metabolic risk factors. Discussions also focused on the use of AI in gastrointestinal diagnosis and the importance of validating these tools before introducing them in standard practice.

Dr. Govind Makharia, Professor, Department of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition, AIIMS, New Delhi and Chairman, Local Organising Committee, WCOG 2026, said, “AI has the potential to strengthen diagnosis and decision-making across gastroenterology, while advanced endoscopy is expanding what can be treated through minimally invasive approaches. The next step is ensuring that these technologies are supported by robust evidence and integrated responsibly into clinical practice.”

H. pylori was also addressed as a preventable risk factor for gastric cancer.

Dr Barry Marshall, Nobel Laureate in Physiology or Medicine, said, “H. pylori is much more than an ulcer organism. If the infection persists for many years, it can cause chronic inflammation in the stomach and increase the risk of gastric cancer. That gives us an opportunity because this is a potentially preventable cause of cancer.”

Advances in minimally invasive procedures like POEM, endoscopic submucosal dissection and therapeutic EUS were also discussed, although access to advanced GI care remains uneven.

The President of the United States, Donald Trump, has revealed that he takes aspirin every day, sharing that he has been doing so for decades because he believes it helps keep his blood “thin”.

He said it while discussing his aspirin use and the bruising that was recently seen on his knuckles. He also said that doctors have advised he take a lower dose.

“I take an aspirin a day. I don’t know if it works but psychologically I need it. It thins the hell out of your blood I guess. I don’t know if it works or not but I’ve been doing it for a long time. And here I am making speeches. I like Bayer aspirin. And I take the big one. They want me to go down to the 80. I take the 386. I don’t know what the hell it is. It’s a monster. They said, ‘Sir, you don’t need that!’ I said, do me a favor, I’ve been doing okay for 35 years. Leave me alone.”

So, does taking an aspirin every day actually protect the heart? And if yes, does a higher dose necessarily provide better results?

Aspirin Reduces Blood Clot Formation

Aspirin affects platelets, which are tiny components of blood that help form clots. By making platelets less likely to clump together, aspirin can reduce the formation of blood clots that could block an artery supplying the heart or brain.

This is why doctors may prescribe daily aspirin to people who have already had a heart attack, stroke, or procedures like coronary stent placement.

But aspirin does not make the blood “thin” in a literal sense. It changes the way blood platelets clot. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) says daily aspirin can help people with cardiovascular disease or those who have already had a heart attack or stroke, but daily use is not suitable for everyone.

Aspirin can reduce the risk of certain blood clot formations, but it can also increase the risk of unwanted bleeding. The FDA warns that aspirin can lead to serious side effects like bleeding in the stomach and brain.

It recommends that people do not take daily aspirin without discussing it first with their healthcare professionals.

Mayo Clinic also says that daily aspirin is not right for everyone. Regular use can increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding and stomach ulcers, while in some people it can also increase the risk of a bleeding stroke.

Also read: Trump Administration Asks SC To Restrict Gender-Affirming Care In Prisons: What Happens If Treatment Stops

Who Should And Shouldn't Take It?

For people who have never had a heart attack or stroke or any other type of cardiovascular disease, taking aspirin routinely to prevent a cardiovascular event is generally not recommended.

The American Heart Association says routine daily aspirin is not recommended for most healthy adults without cardiovascular disease because its benefit can be offset by the risk of serious bleeding.

The FDA also says that for people without cardiovascular disease risk, the risks of long-term aspirin use may be greater than the benefits.

For someone who has already had a heart attack, stroke or any other cardiovascular event, doctors may prescribe daily aspirin because preventing another clot-related event can outweigh the bleeding risk.

According to Mayo Clinic, this is a secondary method of prevention. It says that the benefit of daily aspirin in this group is well established. This does not mean that patients should start, stop or change their aspirin dose on their own.

Also read: White House Chief Of Staff Susie Wiles Reveals Brutal Toll Of Fighting Cancer

Is A Bigger Aspirin Dose Better For Heart?

A higher dose does not automatically provide better protection against heart attacks. Low-dose aspirin prescribed for cardiovascular health is usually around 75 to 100 mg, with 81 mg frequently used.

Mayo Clinic says that the appropriate dose depends on the individual and should be discussed with a healthcare professional.

Taking higher doses of aspirin can increase the risk of bleeding. People with a history of stomach ulcers or gastrointestinal bleeding, bleeding disorders or aspirin allergy may also face greater risks.

The risk of bleeding also increases with age. The American Heart Association says routine aspirin for primary prevention is generally not recommended for healthy adults over 70.