Singer Jesy Nelson recently shared an emotional update regarding the complications she is experiencing in her pregnancy with twin babies. Former Little Mix singer Jesy, who is having twins with partner Zion Foster, announced that she has been diagnosed with pre-twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (pre-TTTS). The condition, which is present in pregnancies involving twins with a shared placenta, has serious risks involved and needs intense medical supervision. As Nelson embarks on this difficult journey, her story enlightens us about a rare but dangerous condition many expectant parents may not know much about.
Twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome is a rare but dangerous condition that arises in monochorionic twin pregnancies, in which identical twins share a single placenta. The placenta supplies the developing babies with oxygen, nutrients, and blood flow, but in TTTS, there is an imbalance of blood vessels that interconnect the twins, and thus the vital resources are not evenly distributed. One twin, or the donor twin, shares excess blood with the other, referred to as the recipient twin. This leads to one baby becoming malnourished and possibly anemic, and the other in danger of heart problems due to too much blood.
Nelson described her diagnosis in a heartfelt Instagram video, explaining that she is currently in the pre-stage of TTTS and undergoing frequent monitoring. "I am being scanned twice a week, and each time, things have gotten a little worse," she shared, expressing her fears and hopes for the health of her babies.
If left untreated, TTTS can have devastating consequences. Medical research indicates that:
TTTS usually advances in stages, beginning with minimal changes in fluid levels and worsening as one twin continues to get an unequal share of blood. In extreme cases, fetal laser surgery, referred to as the Solomon technique, can be employed to divide the blood vessels and balance the twins.
Identical twins may develop differently, and their own unique form of placental sharing can have a dramatic effect on pregnancy risk. Jesy Nelson's twins are considered monochorionic diamniotic (mono/di), which means they share a placenta but have two amniotic sacs. This is the type of pregnancy in about 70% of identical twin pregnancies and carries an increased risk of complications like TTTS, umbilical cord entanglement, and growth restriction.
Conversely, dichorionic diamniotic (di/di) twins both have a separate placenta and amniotic sac, which greatly diminishes the threat of TTTS. Twin pregnancy type is normally identified by early ultrasound, with physicians being able to track future complications from inception.
Twin pregnancies, even without the presence of TTTS, entail a variety of health risks to the mother as well as infants:
Over 60% of twin pregnancies end in premature delivery, with birth usually taking place before 37 weeks. Premature infants can have immature organs and need neonatal intensive care (NICU) assistance to assist with breathing, feeding, and infection fighting.
Pregnant women with multiples are at increased risk of having high blood pressure during pregnancy. This, if left untreated, can result in preeclampsia, a serious complication of pregnancy that can result in damage to organs, preterm labor, and in some cases, maternal or fetal death.
Pregnant women carrying multiples are twice as likely to experience anemia, a condition where the body does not produce enough healthy red blood cells. This can lead to fatigue, dizziness, and complications during delivery.
According to John Hopkins Medicine, multiple birth babies are twice as likely to have congenital abnormalities compared to single births. These can include heart defects, neural tube defects, and gastrointestinal issues.
When twins have to share a placenta, they are more likely to have polyhydramnios (excess amniotic fluid) or oligohydramnios (not enough amniotic fluid). Both result in distress to the babies during fetal development and can result in premature labor.
Twins are at increased risk of excessive postpartum hemorrhage because their uterus is larger and there are greater blood supply needs.
Jesy Nelson's openness about her challenging experience is raising awareness for TTTS, a condition that few individuals—let alone expectant mothers and fathers—might be aware of. Through her tearful video, Nelson stressed the significance of knowing about twin pregnancies aside from the thrill of having multiples. "We had no idea that this type of thing occurs when you're having twins. We just desperately want to make people aware of this because there are so many people who aren't aware."
Her case reminds us of the intricacies involved in twin pregnancy and the significance of early identification and medical management. For mothers carrying twins, frequent ultrasounds and vigilance can become a life-and-death issue for early detection and better outcomes of both babies.
Through constant medical attention and care, she and her partner Zion Foster remain positive and get ready for their babies to be born. In other parents whose situations are no different, the story of Nelson highlights awareness, medical progress, and emotional encouragement in handling complicated pregnancies.
The expecting parents of twin siblings are advised to discuss TTTS screening and possible interventions with their physicians to give their babies the best chance.
Credit: iStock
Long COVID is a group of debilitating conditions that can persist for months or even years after infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which causes COVID-19.
While scientists are still working to fully define the condition, one of the most common and disabling symptoms is brain fog—a cognitive impairment that can significantly affect people's personal and professional lives.
People with brain fog often report difficulty concentrating, multitasking, reading, remembering information, and speaking in full sentences. Fatigue frequently worsens these symptoms. Despite its widespread impact, there are currently no established diagnostic tests or approved treatments for long COVID-related cognitive impairment.
A new clinical trial led by researchers at UCL now offers promising evidence that cognitive rehabilitation may provide lasting relief for these symptoms.
Published in JAMA Network Open, the study found that a 10-week cognitive rehabilitation program helped people with long COVID-related brain fog achieve meaningful improvements in returning to work, hobbies, and everyday activities.
The treatment consisted of weekly one-hour, one-to-one video sessions with a therapist who helped participants develop practical strategies to meet their personal rehabilitation goals. Most participants continued to benefit from the program for at least six months after treatment.
"As many as one in three people with COVID go on to develop long COVID, and cognitive difficulties are among the most common symptoms that can persist for months, disrupting day-to-day functioning and quality of life. People might find it hard to focus or hold on to their thoughts as they struggle with memory, attention and planning, often compounded by fatigue," said lead author Dr Martina Vanova, who completed the research at UCL before moving to Kingston University.
"In our study, we used well-established strategies of goal-oriented cognitive rehabilitation to help people develop ways to tackle the challenges that are most meaningful to them," Vanova added.
Read More: 1 in 6 Americans May Be Suffering From Long COVID, Study Finds
The study, funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), included 78 participants in England who had experienced cognitive symptoms of long COVID for at least three months.
Half of the participants received the cognitive rehabilitation program, while the other half continued with standard NHS care, which varied by region.
Before treatment began, each participant completed an online goal-setting interview to identify three personal goals they wanted to achieve. Most goals focused on returning to work and improving job performance, while others involved everyday activities such as staying focused long enough to watch a full film or read a book.
Therapists then worked with participants to develop personalized strategies to help them achieve those goals.
Read: COVID-19 Vaccination Reduced Risk of Heart Attacks and Strokes in Elderly by 40%: Study
Three months after completing treatment, 84% of participants who received cognitive rehabilitation reported a significant improvement in goal attainment on a 10-point scale, compared with 53% of those receiving standard care.
The benefits were sustained over time. After six months, 53% of participants in the rehabilitation group reported a substantial improvement—defined as an increase of four or more points on the 10-point goal scale—compared with just 15% of those in the control group.
Researchers also observed measurable improvements in executive function, including better cognitive flexibility and faster processing speed.
Researchers also noted that early findings from a separate analysis suggest the program is cost-effective.
"We have found a treatment that provides clinically meaningful and sustained benefit for people with cognitive long COVID symptoms," said Joint senior author Dr Aida Suarez-Gonzalez of the UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology.
"As this program is based on established cognitive rehabilitation techniques that have been used for other conditions, we hope that it can be easily rolled out as a treatment option for people currently living with long COVID."
Credit: Instagram
For nearly eight decades, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has been regarded as one of the world's leading public health institutions.
Established in 1946 to combat malaria, the public health agency has since evolved into a global authority and standard on infectious diseases, vaccinations, chronic illnesses, epidemics, emergency preparedness, health surveillance and much more.
However, the institute has undergone significant changes President Donald Trump returned to the White House in January 2025.
Since its inception in 1946, the CDC has led the response to numerous public health threats, including polio, HIV/AIDS, Ebola, Zika, H1N1 influenza, and the COVID-19 pandemic.
CDC scientists have spent decades shaping its long-standing vaccination programs and policies, disease tracking systems, and emergency responses during epidemics that have influenced public health policies and practices globally.
As the institution completes eight decades, we take a look at how it has changed over time under Donald Trump’s administration. From changes in vaccination policies, reduction in workforce to a shuffle in leadership, CDC has undergone a tectonic shift.
While planning and preparedness for infectious disease has been a huge part of CDC's legacy, the current administration has increasingly focused on chronic diseases, nutrition, and environmental exposures.
One of the earliest and most controversial consequential decisions of the administration was the appointment of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
Kennedy, who is a renowned anti-vaxxer, introduced different goals for federal public health, particularly on chronic disease prevention, environmental health, and greater scrutiny of long-standing vaccine policies.
Also read: Illinois Governor Claims Trump Continues To Suffer From Dementia
Soon after the administration took office, HHS was significantly restructured, with plans to consolidate many public health functions under a newly created Administration for a Healthy America.
In February 2025, more than 1,300 employees of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention lost their jobs. Workforce restructuring was carried out in multiple departments in the following months.
Departments like outbreak surveillance, violence prevention, antibiotic resistance surveillance, Freedom of Information Act requests, and laboratory leadership programs were either downsized or eliminated.
Public health experts widely critcised the move, warning that the reductions could hamper the country’s ability to detect and respond quickly to future outbreaks.
One of the healthcare sections that saw perhaps the biggest change under Trump’s administration was vaccination.
In June 2025, HHS dismissed all 17 members of the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), the independent panel tasked for recommending how vaccines are used in the country.
Also read: New Book Examines Donald Trump's Health, Age Concerns; White House Responds
The committee was later recreated with new members. The move that drew criticism from several medical and scientific organisations. The administration revised several vaccine recommendations, particularly those relating to COVID-19, vaccination for healthy children and pregnant women.
The U.S. additionally withdrew its financial support for Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance. It also stopped hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funding for mRNA vaccine research, including projects involving COVID-19, influenza and RSV vaccines.
Major changes were made in reproductive and gender-related healthcare policies. One of the most talked about was the Mexico City Policy, also known as the ‘global gag rule’. The move restricted U.S. funding for non-government organisations that provide abortion services.
Insurance coverage and funding for gender-affirming healthcare was withdrawn. Several LGBTQ+ references were removed from many federally supported health programs, which sparked widespread outrage.
Susan Monarez was appointed as CDC Director in 2025. But her stint was short-lived after she was dismissed later that year. Reports stated that disagreements over vaccine recommendations led to the leadership dispute. Several senior CDC officials also resigned after Monarez’s exit.
Trump supporters support these changes as they believe they are a part of a long-overdue overhaul of an institution they believe had grown too bureaucratic and too reliant on established scientific principles.
However, many public health experts argue that the changes have affected scientific independence, disrupted long-standing public health programs, and altered the CDC's traditional role as a reliable evidence-driven body.
Credit: iStock
Weight-loss medications such as oral semaglutide have become increasingly popular for treating obesity. However, a new study suggests that a 45-minute, minimally invasive procedure called Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) may deliver greater short-term weight loss than oral semaglutide tablets.
Published in the Endoscopy journal, the study compared two established non-surgical obesity treatments—ESG and oral semaglutide 14 mg.
Researchers from AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad, found that patients who underwent ESG lost significantly more weight than those taking oral semaglutide after six months.
Patients treated with ESG achieved an average 12.72% total body weight loss, compared with 8.67% among those taking semaglutide. The difference remained significant even after adjusting for age, sex, BMI and diabetes.
"The most important message from this study is that obesity treatment has to be individualized. ESG appears to offer a stronger early push in weight loss, especially for patients who need a meaningful reduction in a short period," said Dr. Nitin Jagtap, Consultant Gastroenterologist at AIG Hospitals.
He added that ESG is not a shortcut but a structured intervention that helps patients reset eating habits and build sustainable lifestyle changes.
The retrospective study included 150 adults with obesity treated between January 2024 and April 2025. Of these, 50 underwent ESG, while 100 received oral semaglutide 14 mg once daily.
All participants also followed a calorie-deficient diet and moderate exercise plan, highlighting that both treatments work best alongside lifestyle modifications.
ESG also outperformed semaglutide in the number of patients achieving clinically meaningful weight loss.
No major adverse events were reported in either group.
Notably, by 12 months, the gap between the two treatments had narrowed. Average weight loss was 11.92% in the ESG group and 10.91% in the semaglutide group, with no statistically significant difference.
The findings are particularly relevant for India, where obesity often occurs alongside diabetes, fatty liver disease and cardiovascular risk at lower BMI levels than in Western populations, the researchers said.
The researchers noted that the findings should be interpreted carefully because this was a retrospective, single-centre study, not a randomized clinical trial.
They also stressed that the comparison was limited to oral semaglutide 14 mg and should not be extended to higher-dose injectable GLP-1 drugs or newer dual-incretin therapies, which may produce different results.
"Obesity care is entering a new phase where endoscopy, pharmacology, nutrition and lifestyle medicine must come together," said Dr. D. Nageshwar Reddy, Chairman of AIG Hospitals.
He emphasized that ESG and medications like semaglutide should be viewed as complementary options rather than competing therapies, with the shared goal of achieving and maintaining meaningful weight loss.
Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) is a minimally invasive procedure performed through the mouth without external incisions. Using an endoscope and suturing device, doctors reduce the stomach's size by placing internal stitches, helping patients feel full sooner without surgically removing part of the stomach.
Oral semaglutide belongs to the GLP-1 receptor agonist class of drugs. It reduces appetite, increases feelings of fullness and helps lower calorie intake. Unlike ESG, it requires daily medication, long-term adherence and continued affordability.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited