Credits: Canva
Is your teenager skipping breakfast? Why is that happening and what can you do? As per the data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which surveyed adolescent health and well-being found that 1 in 4 students in high school ate breakfast, which means 3 in 4 high school students are not eating their breakfast. This data is as per the 2023 survey.
The report describes a 10-year long trend and also recent changes among the two years. The study delved deeper into adolescents' dietary, physical activity and sleep behaviors. The study is also based on a national youth risk behavior survey of a representative sample of students from grade nine to 12.
The study found that while high school students drank slightly less soda and sports drinks and consumed more water, other healthy eating habits declined. In 2023, only 27% of students ate breakfast every day in the past week. The numbers were even lower for female students, with just 22% eating breakfast daily, compared to 32% of male students. Boys were also more likely to eat fruits and vegetables daily and drink water at least three times a day. Poor mental health and lack of physical activity have also been linked to skipping breakfast.
The other findings included a survey across 10-year period, where a decrease in the percentage of students eating fruits from 65% to 55%, eating vegetables, from 61% to 58%, and having breakfast daily from 38% to 27% was noted.
However, there was a positive trend among this, which was in children drinking plain water at least three times a day, which increased from 49% to 54% from when the survey began in 2015.. There were fewer students who also said that they drank soda in 2023 than in 2013. On an average, in 2013, around 22% students avoided soda, whereas in 2023, 31% students avoided it.
The report also emphasized that a healthy diet, along with daily physical activity and sufficient sleep further contributes to a healthy lifestyle. “The 10-year trends from 2013 to 2023 also show a decline in healthy dietary, physical activity, and sleep behaviors,” the survey reported.
While there is no one straightforward answer to it, psychologists and those who study children, believe that for many high school going kids, it is the easiest time to skip a meal. This is because they are caught between rushing to school, or not just that hungry in the morning. So for them, to sit down to have a breakfast may seem hassle and something they would have to take time out from their busy schedule. They at this age also prioritize their extra-curricular activities.
There has also been a shift in their circadian rhythm, and most teens cannot fall asleep before 11 pm, or even at midnight. Which means they wake up tired and struggle to do things right in the morning, which is why they choose to skip breakfast or give extra minutes to any other activities.
There is of course another, more popular reason, to lose weight. While experts and studies, like the one published in the Journal of Nutrition that found skipping breakfast leads to higher levels of hunger hormones, the students still feel the need to do this. However, it could lead to a slow metabolism, prompt the body to conserve energy and burn fewer calories, weight gain and deprive yo off the essential nutrients like calcium, iron, and vitamin D.
Without a morning breakfast, your blood sugar might drop too, which can increase irritability and stress, along with including the risk of depression in teenage.
Credit: iStock
Around 450 people in Gorakhpur district of Uttar Pradesh have received anti-rabies vaccinations after consuming charanamrit prepared with milk from a cow suspected of being rabid. The animal died after exhibiting unusual behaviour, which sparked concern among residents of two villages who may have consumed milk from the same cow.
The health department organised a vaccination camp in Dadi Khas village, in the Gola block of Gorakhpur, on October 21. Officials said around 50 people received the vaccine on Tuesday, followed by another 400 during the camp on Wednesday.
The incident came to light after the cow's condition deteriorated and the animal died on Tuesday evening. According to its owner, Navami Yadav, the cow had appeared unwell for one or two days before its condition worsened.
Private veterinarians suspected that a stray dog might have bitten the animal, although they did not confirm if the animal had rabies.
The cow's milk had reportedly been supplied to two shops and various households, extending concern beyond those who consumed charanamrit during Durga Puja.
Residents of Dadi Khas and neighbouring Govindpur village were among those affected by the concern over possible exposure.
A health department team led by pharmacist Siddharth Singh visited the village and administered the vaccines.
Amarendra Thakur, the in-charge of the community health centre, advised residents concerned about exposure to consult medical professionals and follow the recommended vaccination schedule. He also said arrangements would be made to ensure vaccines remained available at the health centre.
Also read: Decoding Unusual Rabies Symptoms: Why Can Rabies Cause a Fear of Water, Air or Wind?
The incident has raised questions about whether consuming milk from a suspected rabid animal can transmit the infection.
Rabies is a viral disease that affects the central nervous system. It is mostly transmitted when the saliva of an infected animal enters the body through a bite or scratch, or comes into contact with broken skin or the mucous membranes of the eyes, nose or mouth.
Dogs account for most human rabies cases worldwide, but other infected mammals, like cattle, can also carry the virus.
However, there is no evidence that rabies is transmitted through the consumption of milk.
The World Health Organization (WHO) states that post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), which includes preventive treatment after a possible exposure, is not required solely because a person has consumed milk from a rabid animal. The WHO nevertheless advises against consuming milk from animals infected with rabies.
India's National Rabies Control Programme provides similar guidance, stating that there are no evidence-based reports of human rabies arising from consuming milk, including breast milk.
The cow in the UP incident was suspected of having rabies, but it had not been confirmed. But people who have consumed milk from a suspected infected animal should seek exposure advice from a healthcare professional.
According to the WHO, suspected rabies exposure requires prompt assessment because the disease is almost invariably fatal once clinical symptoms develop, but can be prevented when post-exposure prophylaxis is administered on time. Treatment may involve wound care, course of rabies vaccinations and, rabies immunoglobulin in some cases.
Credit: AI
Pharmaceutical giants Moderna and Merck have been developing a personalised cancer vaccine that differs according to the patient's tumour characteristics.
According to results from a Phase 3 clinical trial, the vaccine has reportedly reduced the risk of melanoma returning or death by 42% and the risk of cancer spreading by 38% when combined with standard immunotherapy.
The findings, reported on October 22, build on evidence that messenger RNA (mRNA) technology could play a pathbreaking role in treating cancer.
The experimental vaccine, intismeran autogene, was tested alongside Keytruda, Merck’s immunotherapy drug, in patients whose melanoma had been surgically removed.
The Phase 3 INTerpath-001 trial was based on 1,137 patients with high-risk stage IIB, IIC, III or IV melanoma who had undergone surgical removal of their cancer.
Participants received either intismeran autogene alongside Keytruda or Keytruda alone. The researchers compared how effectively the treatments helped prevent the cancer from returning or spreading.
After two years, 82.2% of patients who received the vaccine combination remained cancer-free, compared to 70% of those who received Keytruda alone, according to the trial results.
The combination also reduced the risk of recurrence or death by 42% and the risk of metastasis or death by 38%.
The study achieved its primary endpoint of recurrence-free survival and its key secondary endpoint of distant metastasis-free survival.
Also read: Norah O’Donnell’s Skin Cancer Journey: Her Dermatologist Warns Against Tanning Beds & Sunburns
Unlike conventional vaccines that prevent infections, intismeran autogene is a personalised cancer vaccine. It is developed using a sample of the patient’s tumour to identify mutations that distinguish cancer cells from healthy cells.
The treatment uses mRNA to encode up to 34 tumour targets, known as neoantigens. Once administered, these targets help the immune system recognise those targets and generate an immune response against cancer cells.
The vaccine is designed to be used with Keytruda. The vaccine and immunotherapy therefore have complementary roles in the treatment strategy.
Professor Georgina Long, the trial’s principal investigator and medical director of Melanoma Institute Australia, said the results are a significant development for treatment after surgery.
“'This is a coalescence of an mRNA platform, personalised, and the use of algorithms and data in a way that we've never seen before. These results show that patients with earlier-stage melanoma can be treated after surgery in a fundamentally new way,” Professor Long said.
The combination’s safety profile was consistent with previous studies, and the companies said no new safety signals were observed in the Phase 3 trial. Detailed findings are being presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology meeting in Madrid.
She added, “Intismeran in combination with pembrolizumab has the potential to establish a new treatment paradigm in the adjuvant melanoma setting, helping patients remain cancer-free for longer,” Long said in the companies’ August announcement of the trial’s positive topline results.
Moderna and Merck have said they will engage with regulators about submitting the treatment for approval. Further FD review will be needed before it can become a treatment option.
Credit: AI
An experimental daily pill developed by Swiss healthcare company F Hoffmann-La Roche AG has sparked hope for a new treatment option for people with early-stage breast cancer. The drug, giredestrant, reduced the risk of invasive disease recurrence or death by at least 30% compared to standard hormone therapy, according to findings from its Phase 3 trial.
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is expected to share its drug approval verdict by November 30, 2026.
Giredestrant is an experimental once-daily pill designed to block and degrade oestrogen receptors, which can contribute to breast cancer risk.
It is being studied in oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, a subtype that accounts for the majority of breast cancer diagnoses.
The Phase 3 lidERA trial, involving 4,100 people with early-stage ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, compared giredestrant to standard endocrine therapy.
The results showed that giredestrant reduced the risk of disease recurrence or death by 30% relative to standard endocrine therapy.
At three years, 92.4% of participants receiving giredestrant were alive and free of invasive disease, compared to 89.6% of those receiving standard treatment.
Even though the trial met its primary goal, overall survival data was still immature at the time of analysis. Hence, the findings depict an improvement in invasive disease-free survival, not proof that the drug helps people live longer.
Giredestrant was generally well tolerated in the trial. Treatment was discontinued because of adverse events in 5.3% of participants receiving the drug, compared to 8.2% receiving standard endocrine therapy.
On October 19, Roche announced that it would present new giredestrant data at the 2026 ESMO Annual Meeting, scheduled for October 23 to 27 in Madrid.
The presentation includes outcomes reported by patients from the lidERA trial. According to Roche, these findings suggest that the promising results in reducing disease recurrence seen with giredestrant was achieved without compromising tolerability or quality of life of the patients.
The company will also present biomarker findings from the evERA trial, which was based on giredestrant combined with everolimus in advanced breast cancer. These are separate settings from using giredestrant alone after surgery for early-stage disease.
Earlier in October, detailed results from the Phase 3 evERA trial were published in The New England Journal of Medicine.
In people with advanced ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, giredestrant combined with everolimus reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 44%.
With 62%, the combination showed even results among participants whose tumours had an ESR1 mutation, compared to standard endocrine therapy combined with everolimus. The FDA has set December 18, 2026, to announce its decision for this combination in certain patients with advanced breast cancer.
The FDA accepted Roche's application for giredestrant as an adjuvant treatment for adults with stage I to III ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer under priority review. The decision will be made on November 30, 2026.
If approved, giredestrant’s use will depend on the overall clinical guidance and patient's individual circumstances. According to Bloomberg, the drug is expected to generate up to $15 billion in revenue.
© $2026 Times Horizon Private Limited