Is your teenager skipping breakfast? Why is that happening and what can you do? As per the data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which surveyed adolescent health and well-being found that 1 in 4 students in high school ate breakfast, which means 3 in 4 high school students are not eating their breakfast. This data is as per the 2023 survey.

What Did The Study Intend?

The report describes a 10-year long trend and also recent changes among the two years. The study delved deeper into adolescents' dietary, physical activity and sleep behaviors. The study is also based on a national youth risk behavior survey of a representative sample of students from grade nine to 12.

What Did The Study Find?

The study found that while high school students drank slightly less soda and sports drinks and consumed more water, other healthy eating habits declined. In 2023, only 27% of students ate breakfast every day in the past week. The numbers were even lower for female students, with just 22% eating breakfast daily, compared to 32% of male students. Boys were also more likely to eat fruits and vegetables daily and drink water at least three times a day. Poor mental health and lack of physical activity have also been linked to skipping breakfast.

The other findings included a survey across 10-year period, where a decrease in the percentage of students eating fruits from 65% to 55%, eating vegetables, from 61% to 58%, and having breakfast daily from 38% to 27% was noted.

However, there was a positive trend among this, which was in children drinking plain water at least three times a day, which increased from 49% to 54% from when the survey began in 2015.. There were fewer students who also said that they drank soda in 2023 than in 2013. On an average, in 2013, around 22% students avoided soda, whereas in 2023, 31% students avoided it.

The report also emphasized that a healthy diet, along with daily physical activity and sufficient sleep further contributes to a healthy lifestyle. “The 10-year trends from 2013 to 2023 also show a decline in healthy dietary, physical activity, and sleep behaviors,” the survey reported.

Why Do High School Students Skip Breakfast?

While there is no one straightforward answer to it, psychologists and those who study children, believe that for many high school going kids, it is the easiest time to skip a meal. This is because they are caught between rushing to school, or not just that hungry in the morning. So for them, to sit down to have a breakfast may seem hassle and something they would have to take time out from their busy schedule. They at this age also prioritize their extra-curricular activities.

There has also been a shift in their circadian rhythm, and most teens cannot fall asleep before 11 pm, or even at midnight. Which means they wake up tired and struggle to do things right in the morning, which is why they choose to skip breakfast or give extra minutes to any other activities.

There is of course another, more popular reason, to lose weight. While experts and studies, like the one published in the Journal of Nutrition that found skipping breakfast leads to higher levels of hunger hormones, the students still feel the need to do this. However, it could lead to a slow metabolism, prompt the body to conserve energy and burn fewer calories, weight gain and deprive yo off the essential nutrients like calcium, iron, and vitamin D.

Without a morning breakfast, your blood sugar might drop too, which can increase irritability and stress, along with including the risk of depression in teenage.

Kate Middleton or Catherine, Princess of Wales reflected on the aftermath of chemotherapy in her first public appearance since she had unexpectedly withdrawn from Royal Ascot just two weeks ago.

She has called the entire experience "really difficult". On her visit to a wellbeing garden at Colchester Hospital in Essex, England on Wednesday, she told the patients, "You put on a sort of brave face, stoicism through treatment, treatment’s done – then it’s like ‘I can crack on, get back to normal.’ But actually the phase afterwards is really difficult, you’re not necessarily under the clinical team any longer, but you’re not able to function normally at home as you perhaps once used to."

The reason she visited the hospital garden in the Southeast of England was to "celebrate the incredible healing power of nature", noted Kensington Palace.

She also met with patients and hospital staff at the Cancer Wellbeing Centre "to understand how gardens in healthcare setting play a crucial role in promoting good health outcomes, preventing poor health and supporting increased recovery time."

Now 43, Kate herself has pointed out to the importance of nature in her health journey over the last year.

Is There Any Scientific Proof That Nature Could Actually Heal You?

Lisa A Cooper, MD, MPH writes in the 'Letter from the Director' at John Hopkins Medicine that nature does have healing power. She notes that green spaces play a role in cardiovascular health, and also facilitates to interact with other people who are there to enjoy nature. The American Psychological Association (APA) also noted that spending time in nature is linked to both cognitive benefits and improvements in mood, mental health and emotional well-being. The University of Cincinnati also points out that being out in nature can further reduce anxiety, lower blood pressure, enhance immune system function, and boost self esteem and mood.

In fact in a video, which was posted by Kate on X to mark Mental Health Awareness Week in May, she said, "over the past year, nature has been my sanctuary."

Kate's Cancer Timeline

In March, Princess Kate publicly shared her cancer diagnosis and confirmed she had begun chemotherapy. As she focused on her recovery, she stepped away from the public eye, making only a few limited appearances over the summer. By September, she announced she had completed chemotherapy and was "doing what I can to stay cancer-free."

Since then, the Princess of Wales has been gradually re-engaging with her royal responsibilities. While she has increased her public appearances this year, palace insiders say she is carefully managing her return to balance her health with her official duties.

Earlier this summer, Kate made high-profile appearances at key royal events, including the Trooping the Colour parade in London and the Order of the Garter service in Windsor. However, she later withdrew from the Royal Ascot at the last minute, signaling that her return to full-time royal duties is still being handled with care.

Just last week, Kate resumed in-person engagements, joining Prince William in hosting philanthropist Melinda French Gates at Windsor Castle. The meeting, reportedly focused on their shared philanthropic interests, marked one of her first official engagements in recent weeks.

On Wednesday, the Princess made a meaningful visit to Colchester Hospital, where she helped plant several “Catherine’s Rose” plants—a specially bred rose named in her honor by the Royal Horticultural Society. The visit coincided with the hospital receiving a donation of 50 such plants.

The rose holds special significance: proceeds from its commercial sale will go to The Royal Marsden Cancer Charity, supporting cancer patients through treatment and beyond. The funds will help the charity develop a dedicated program focused on improving quality of life for those living with cancer and those who have completed treatment.

Princess Kate has deepened her connection with the Royal Marsden since her diagnosis. In January, Kensington Palace announced she had been named joint patron of The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, the specialist cancer center in Chelsea, west London, where she received treatment.

Her involvement with the charity and efforts to raise awareness reflect her commitment to supporting others navigating a cancer diagnosis. While her return to public life is cautious and measured, each appearance signals both her resilience and her intention to use her platform for meaningful causes.

As she continues to recover and adjust, the Princess of Wales remains one of the most admired and closely followed members of the royal family—balancing personal healing with her public role.

The global community seems to have received a stark warning based a new study published in The Lancet, President Donald Trump's drastic cuts of US foreign humanitarian aid could lead to over 14 million extra deaths by 2030. The study, based on two decades of global health data, highlights the alarming consequences of retracting the US support to vulnerable groups, especially in low- and middle-income nations. With an estimated third of these deaths likely to be children, the results have left the global aid and public health communities in shock.

The Trump administration's wholesale slashing of foreign assistance programs was grounded in the "America First" doctrine, a political ideology that subordinates global involvement to domestic priorities. In March, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said more than 80% of all USAID programs had been cut. The sudden rollback came as billionaire Elon Musk—then leading a federal workforce reduction effort—sought to re-make the delivery of aid programs, which critics claim were more concerned with trimming costs than with saving lives.

America has traditionally been the globe's biggest giver of humanitarian aid, with the US Agency for International Development (USAID) active in over 60 countries. In 2023 alone, America spent $68 billion on foreign aid. But in March this year, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio declared that the Trump administration had terminated more than 80% of all USAID programmes due to a desire to cut wasteful spending, as the administration claimed. It was an effort to cut the federal workforce and trim government operations, led in part by billionaire Elon Musk.

As per the Lancet research, written by Davide Rasella of the Barcelona Institute for Global Health and colleagues, the suggested 83% funding reduction has the potential to halt or even reverse two decades of improvement in global health. The researchers simulated the probable effect on low- and middle-income countries' mortality and opined that the end of U.S. support would unleash a devastating increase in avoidable deaths.

The team from The Lancet study examined data from 133 nations and projected the effect of the cuts over the period to 2030. Their forecasts are grim:

• Over 14 million extra deaths worldwide by 2030 if the cuts are not reversed.
• Over 4.5 million of those deaths would be children under the age of five, representing around 700,000 child deaths annually.

The impact on global health systems would be "comparable in magnitude to a global pandemic or a major war," co-author Davide Rasella of the Barcelona Institute for Global Health said.

The findings of the study are especially concerning for low- and middle-income countries, whose health, nutrition, and development programs have been a lifeline for USAID funding. The sudden cutoff in support risks stopping—and even reversing—two decades of advances in decreasing mortality and enhancing health outcomes among the world's most vulnerable citizens.

The United States' withdrawal has had spillovers. In Washington's wake, a number of other donor states, such as the UK, France, and Germany, also reduced their own contributions. The chain reaction has exacerbated the worldwide funding gap for humanitarian projects. The United Nations says that the global humanitarian community is now experiencing "the deepest funding cuts ever," as needs continue higher than ever in response to conflict, climate-related disaster, and pandemic fallout.

Between 2001 and 2021, estimated lives saved in developing countries through USAID-supported programmes are 91 million, including 30 million children. The effect was particularly significant among recipient countries with high volumes of aid, where all-cause mortality reduced by 15%, and child mortality declined by 32%. In focus disease areas, mortality due to HIV/AIDS, malaria, and neglected tropical diseases decreased by 74%, 53%, and 51% respectively in recipient countries with significant USAID presence.

The cuts now in place risk reversing these hard-won achievements. The authors of the study say the withdrawal of US funding will not only raise mortality but also destabilize health systems, undermine disease control, and deny millions access to life-saving services

Ironically, the release of the Lancet report happened at the same time that a large United Nations-sponsored aid conference took place in Seville, Spain—the largest one in a decade. The lack of U.S. participation in this pivotal meeting did not escape attention. Critics point out that Washington's absence belittles decades of American dominance in global health diplomacy and squanders its credibility as a humanitarian leader.

President Trump has consistently justified the cuts as a way to eliminate waste and make sure US spending is aligned with America's national interests. Secretary of State Rubio said the remaining 1,000 or so aid programs will be handled "more effectively" by the State Department and in coordination with Congress. Critics counter that the cuts are short-sighted and could jeopardize both global stability and America's international reputation.

Human rights activists and world health professionals warn that the erosion of US leadership in humanitarian assistance could spur other nations to do the same, further exacerbating the crisis. The authors of the Lancet study emphasize that if the sudden funding reductions are not reversed, the world will see a "staggering number of avoidable deaths" in coming years

They also support more intelligent, effective aid delivery systems that focus on transparency, local participation, and evidence-based action. The bottom line: investing in global health is not only a moral imperative but a strategic one that ensures world stability, economic growth, and public health security.

With the world confronting increasing challenges—from climate change and pandemics to conflict and displacement—the demand for strong, united global assistance has never been greater. The future of millions of people is at stake, and the choices that are made today will determine the future of global health for generations to come.

Medicine is evolving—and quickly. With chronic diseases surging and scientific innovations accelerating, a new generation of best-selling medicines is revolutionizing the way we treat cancer, diabetes, autoimmune diseases, and obesity. These are not merely pharma successes—these are clinical game changers fueling billions of dollars in investment, research, and optimism.

These most-anticipated drugs in 2025 reflect this shift. Cancer drugs such as Keytruda are raising the bar in oncology, and metabolic medicines such as Ozempic and Mounjaro are transforming the treatment of diabetes and weight. And drugs such as Dupixent and Skyrizi are breaking ground in treating chronic inflammatory diseases, bringing targeted comfort to tens of millions.

The best-selling medications in the world are not only business blockbusters—they are also medical breakouts in the treatment of cancer, diabetes, obesity, and chronic disease. Although sales estimates provide mind-boggling numbers—such as Merck & Co.'s Keytruda poised to exceed $31 billion—the tale behind the tabulation is based on mighty innovations that are transforming how we address some of the globe's most urgent health issues.

The pharma landscape of 2025 is considerably characterized by a focused attempt to address some of the most debilitating and entrenched health issues of our era. Cancer, especially aggressive and difficult-to-treat types such as non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, and multiple myeloma, continues to remain high on the agenda, with cutting-edge immunotherapies and biologics at the forefront. Simultaneously, increasing worldwide incidence of metabolic disorders like type 2 diabetes and obesity has fueled a new generation of therapies targeted at controlling blood sugar, facilitating weight loss, and lowering cardiovascular risk.

What Diseases are The Main Focus?

Cancer (Oncology)

Cancer is still the biggest and best-funded field in contemporary medicine, with non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, multiple myeloma, and triple-negative breast cancer ranking high. New immunotherapies and monoclonal antibodies are transforming therapy by educating the immune system to recognize and destroy cancer cells more precisely and with fewer side effects than conventional chemotherapy.

Leading the charge is Keytruda (pembrolizumab), an immunotherapy medication that's transforming cancer treatment. Approved for use to treat several kinds of cancer, including melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, head and neck cancer, and others, Keytruda functions by strengthening the immune system so it can more effectively find and kill cancer cells. This type of mechanism, referred to as a checkpoint inhibitor, has significantly enhanced survival rates for many aggressive cancers.

Its estimated $31 billion worth of sales in 2025 attests to more than pure economic success—it is a testament to the extent to which immunotherapies have become integrated in oncology therapy worldwide. The rising cancer burden across the world and high growth in the use of immunotherapies in early-stage treatment are among the principal factors propelling its quick ascension.

Type 2 Diabetes

Type 2 diabetes is a metabolic disorder with insulin resistance and persistent hyperglycemia, resulting in long-term damage to the heart, kidneys, and nerves. New drugs not only are enhancing glucose control but also are showing substantial reductions in cardiovascular risks, making them an dual solution for two of the world's top causes of death.

Then come Ozempic and Wegovy, which are trade names for semaglutide, made by Novo Nordisk. The two drugs, though chemically the same, have very different uses. Ozempic is indicated for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, whereas Wegovy is indicated for long-term weight management in people who have obesity or overweight and one or more weight-related conditions.

Semaglutide is a mimic of the GLP-1 hormone, controlling insulin secretion, appetite, and digestion. Its success is representative of the increasing convergence between metabolic health and management of chronic disease. Together, these drugs are expected to account for more than $36 billion in 2025, not just an indication of their medical importance but also of society's increasing interest in the prevention of diabetes and obesity.

Obesity

Obesity is increasingly being seen as a chronic, complex disease rather than merely a matter of lifestyle, and it's firmly connected with diabetes, heart disease, and some types of cancer. New generation weight-loss medications imitate gut hormones to reduce hunger, control blood sugar, and achieve long-term weight loss without surgery.

Eli Lilly's blockbuster, tirzepatide, takes a parallel course with its two brand names, Mounjaro for type 2 diabetes and Zepbound for weight loss. With its novel dual-action mechanism acting on GLP-1 and GIP receptors, it has even more potent appetite suppression and glucose lowering compared to earlier treatments.

Mounjaro's $19.8 billion forecasted sales, combined with Zepbound's $11.3 billion, are testament to the status of tirzepatide as a next-generation therapy for the obesity-diabetes continuum. With obesity as a gateway disease for cancer, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes, the role of drugs such as these in the preventive sphere cannot be overemphasized.

Chronic Inflammatory Diseases

Diseases like eczema (atopic dermatitis), asthma, nasal polyps, and eosinophilic esophagitis are fueled by hyperactive immune reactions that lead to ongoing inflammation and tissue injury. Biologics for targeted therapies are enabling patients to control these diseases over the long term by silencing particular immune pathways, leading to enhanced quality of life and reduced flare-ups.

Outside of cancer and metabolic disorders, chronic inflammatory and viral diseases also top the list of 10:

Dupixent (dupilumab) is revolutionizing treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis, asthma, and eosinophilic esophagitis by addressing the IL-4 and IL-13 pathway responsible for allergic inflammation. Its estimated $16.9 billion indicates the increasing application of biologics in dermatological and respiratory conditions.

Skyrizi (risankizumab), for plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and Crohn's disease, employs IL-23 blockade to decrease systemic inflammation. Its increasing popularity indicates an increased emphasis on fewer side effects and targeted immunomodulators.

HIV/AIDS

Treatment for HIV has improved with once-daily combination tablets that suppress the virus, prevent transmission, and promote near-normal life expectancy. The regimens are now maximized for tolerability and long-term administration, including pediatric and adolescent options.

Biktarvy, which is an HIV drug made by Gilead, combines three antiviral medicines to hold back the virus and make treatment regimens easier. As HIV progresses to become a chronic manageable disease, Biktarvy's projected $13.4 billion sales reflect its place in contemporary, once-daily HIV treatment.

Cardiovascular Disease

The prevention of strokes, blood clots, and heart attacks is a central focus in world health, especially in older adults. Oral anticoagulants are commonly used to treat atrial fibrillation and prevent thromboembolism after surgery or due to chronic disease without the requirement for ongoing blood monitoring.

Eliquis (apixaban), an anticoagulant for stroke prevention and deep vein thrombosis, remains a best-seller. With aging populations and increasing cases of atrial fibrillation, so does demand for safer anticoagulants increase. Its $13 billion forecast confirms the value of preventive cardiology.

COVID-19

Although the pandemic's peak has already gone, innovation in vaccines continues to safeguard susceptible groups and look ahead to future variants. mRNA-based platforms became a template for rapid-response vaccine development, representing a pivot in infectious disease prevention.

At the same time, Comirnaty, the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, holds its commercial value at $13.5 billion in anticipated 2025 sales. While demand for vaccination on a worldwide scale has leveled off, booster drives, new strains, and breaking into mRNA-based flu and RSV vaccines keep Comirnaty in worldwide circulation.

Top 10 Drugs Projected by Global Sales in 2025

What holds all of these number-one-selling medications together is their evidence of a larger shift in world medicine. The action is more personalized, with gene-targeting and biologics mirroring the old one-size-fits-all approach. There's a discernible trend toward preventive health, where problems like diabetes, obesity, and cardiovascular disease are treated early and aggressively.

Additionally, the triumph of drugs such as Keytruda, Dupixent, and Skyrizi reflects the broadening scope of immune-based treatments, not only in cancer but in dermatology, gastroenterology, and pulmonology. Likewise, the call for metabolic treatments reflects public health efforts addressing global epidemics such as obesity and diabetes.

Though forecasted 2025 revenues of leading medicines present stunning numbers, the actual story involves what these medications are accomplishing for patients. From transforming cancer treatment to allowing long-term weight management, to allowing people with HIV to live longer and healthier—these drugs are milestones in contemporary medicine.