(Credit-Canva)
The current measles outbreak has gripped US states like Texas and New Mexico leaving people worried whether it would become a new pandemic. According to the Texas Department of State Health Services as of February 21, 90 cases were diagnosed in the last month in the South Plains area, with at least 77 of them were reported in children and teens under 17.
Measles is highly contagious and can be deadly. The outbreak, which started spreading in late January, has resulted in multiple hospitalizations, with at least nine confirmed cases and three probable cases as of early February. Health officials caution that at least one in five infected individuals will have to be hospitalized, highlighting the severity of the situation.
Misinformation surrounding vaccines and with the new Trump administration anti-vaccine campaigs, has causing parents to hesitate or refuse vaccination.
Furthermore, the country down under Australia is also witnessing a surge in measles cases as health officials in Sydney have issued an urgent alert, urging residents to watch for measles symptoms after an infected individual visited several places in Sydney over the last seven days.
Authorities report that the traveller had returned from South East Asia where there are ongoing outbreaks of measles.
Key symptoms of measles include fever, a runny nose, sore eyes, and a cough. Typically, a red, blotchy rash appears three to four days later, spreading from the head down to the body. Symptoms can manifest between 7 and 18 days after exposure.
Anyone who experiences these symptoms after potential exposure should immediately contact their doctor or emergency department. It is crucial to call ahead before visiting to avoid potentially exposing others in the waiting room. Dr. Selvey also highlighted that ongoing measles outbreaks are occurring in various parts of the world, making awareness and prompt action essential.
According to CDC everyone should get the MMR vaccine. It protects you from measles, mumps, and rubella. Getting vaccinated helps stop these diseases from spreading. There are two safe MMR vaccines available. They work the same way, so it doesn't matter which one you get. Kids can also get a shot that protects against chickenpox too, but this is only for children.
All children should get two MMR shots. The first shot should be given when they are between 12 and 15 months old. The second shot should be given when they are between 4 and 6 years old. If needed, the second shot can be given earlier, but it must be at least 28 days after the first shot.
Students going to college or other schools after high school, need two shots if they are not already immune. The shots must be at least 28 days apart.
Most adults need at least one MMR shot. Some adults need two shots, especially those who work in healthcare, travel a lot, or go to college. These people should get two shots, with 28 days between them.
Anyone traveling to other countries should make sure they are protected. Babies 6 to 11 months old should get one shot before traveling. Kids 12 months and older, teens, and adults need two shots, with 28 days between them.
People who work in healthcare should have proof that they are immune to measles, mumps, and rubella. If they are not immune, they need two MMR shots, spaced 28 days apart.
Women who might get pregnant should talk to their doctor about the MMR vaccine. It's safe to get the shot while breastfeeding.
Credit: AP
US President is reportedly asking Secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr to make more efforts to cut childhood vaccines in America, according to a media report.
The 80-year-old US president hopes to make “alleviating autism” a component of his legacy, and told Kennedy that he wasn’t making enough cuts to the US vaccination schedule, the Wall Street Journal reported. The report, citing sources, said that Trump believes cutting down the number of recommended childhood vaccines may lead to a drop in autism rates in the country.
He, thus, expressed frustration with the slow pace of progress on the issue at a mid-June Oval Office meeting with Kennedy.
“Donald Trump has been anti-vaccine at least since 2015,” said Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center and an infectious diseases physician at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. At the Republican primary debate that year, Trump said that autism had gotten “totally out of control” and vaccines should be in “smaller doses over a longer period of time”.
Further, Trump reportedly also wants to break the combination vaccine for the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination (MMR) into different shots, to reduce the risk of autism.
However, there has been no scientific evidence to prove that paring down the childhood vaccine schedule can reduce autism rates. Similarly, studies over the years have shown no connection between the MMR and autism.
Kennedy, last year, cancelled roughly $500 million in mRNA vaccine research grants and removed every single member of an immunization advisory panel.
But after White House aides told Kennedy that vaccine skepticism was less popular with voters, and they asked him to focus on more palatable topics, such as food reform, the Health Secretary has largely been mum on vaccines publicly. Trump’s recent urgency on the issue ignores his political advisers’ warnings.
Meanwhile, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) revised webpage on autism and vaccines is reigniting the debate over how health agencies should communicate scientific evidence.
The controversy was sparked by changes made to the CDC's autism webpage, which now states that the claim "vaccines do not cause autism" is "not an evidence-based claim" as studies have not ruled out every possible link between infant vaccines and autism.
The page also says the HHS is continuing to investigate the causes of autism.
The revised language represents a shift from the CDC's longstanding public messaging, which for years stated that extensive scientific research had found no causal relationship between vaccines and autism.
Republican Senator Bill Cassidy slammed the agency's messaging while continuing to defend the overwhelming scientific evidence that vaccines do not cause autism.
The changes have also drawn criticism from scientists, physicians, and lawmakers who fear they could weaken public confidence in routine childhood immunization.
Despite the debate surrounding the CDC webpage, the broader scientific consensus has not changed. Large studies conducted over several decades in multiple countries have consistently found no evidence that routine childhood vaccines cause autism.
Major medical organizations continue to support vaccination as one of the safest and most effective public health interventions.
Health experts have also warned that ambiguous or conflicting public health messaging could further affect vaccine confidence at a time when the United States is experiencing its highest number of measles cases in more than three decades, largely driven by declining childhood vaccination rates.
The controversy highlights the growing tension between political oversight and scientific communication within U.S. public health agencies.
For public health experts, the concern extends beyond a single webpage. They argue that how government agencies present scientific evidence can directly influence vaccine confidence, healthcare decisions, and efforts to prevent outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases.
Credit: AI
A new study suggests that nearly one in three adults in the United States could benefit from blood pressure-lowering medication under the latest treatment guidelines.
Yet millions who qualify are either not taking medication or have blood pressure that remains above recommended targets, highlighting a major gap in hypertension care.
The findings, published in JAMA, analysed data from the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) collected between 2021 and 2023.
Researchers evaluated how the updated 2025 American Heart Association (AHA) and American College of Cardiology (ACC) blood pressure guidelines would affect treatment eligibility.
According to the researchers, an estimated 34 million U.S. adults, roughly one in three, meet the criteria for blood pressure medication but are not currently taking it.
Nearly 19 million of them have blood pressure readings of 140/90 mmHg or higher, placing them at increased risk of heart attack, stroke, kidney disease, and dementia if left untreated.
The study also found that almost 80% of adults with hypertension have blood pressure levels above the recommended treatment goal of less than 130/80 mmHg.
Also read: Not Just The Heart, Obesity In Midlife Could Be Just As Harmful To The Brain: Study
Researchers observed that many adults with high blood pressure were not taking any antihypertensive medication, despite being eligible under current guidelines.
Among those who were not receiving treatment, about two-thirds had blood pressure values within 10 mmHg of the recommended target.
The observation suggested that a combination of medication and lifestyle changes could help many get their readings down.
On the other hand, people who were already taking medication often had blood pressure levels that remained well above target, indicating that medication may need to be intensified.
The authors wrote, “Many could potentially achieve blood pressure control with initiation of antihypertensive medication and lifestyle modification.”
They further noted, “These findings highlight a large gap in hypertension control that implementation of the 2025 AHA/ACC blood pressure guideline recommendations could address.”
High blood pressure is often called the “silent killer” because it usually causes no symptoms while quietly damaging blood vessels and vital organs over time.
According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), uncontrolled hypertension is a major contributor to heart disease and stroke, two of the leading causes of death in the country.
Researchers also pointed out that more than 80% of adults with uncontrolled blood pressure had health insurance and a regular place for medical care, suggesting that access alone does not fully explain why treatment goals are not being met.
The updated AHA/ACC guidelines emphasise that treatment should not rely on medication alone. Doctors recommend:
As hypertension continues to affect millions, researchers say earlier diagnosis, timely treatment, and sustained lifestyle changes could substantially reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease and improve long-term health outcomes.
Credit: AI
Northern Ireland is set to restrict price promotions on unhealthy foods as part of its long-term strategy to curb rising obesity rates,
With this move, the country has joined the UK who has been making efforts to create healthier food environments.
The proposed policy is expected to limit promotions like multi-buy offers and other incentives on foods high in fat, salt and sugar (HFSS).
It could make healthier choices more accessible, reducing the influence of marketing on consumer behavior.
The policy forms part of Northern Ireland's Healthy Futures: Tackling Obesity strategy, which emphasizes prevention alongside better treatment services.
The Department of Health has recently announced the rollout of a Regional Obesity Management Service, but public health experts say clinical services alone will not reverse the obesity epidemic without stronger preventive policies.
Obesity remains one of Northern Ireland's biggest public health challenges. Around 65% of adults in Northern Ireland are overweight or living with obesity, while about one in four children are affected.
Excess weight significantly increases the risk of type 2 diabetes, heart disease, stroke, certain cancers and other chronic illnesses.
Policymakers and health advocates argue that supermarkets' rampant discounts and volume-based promotions on calorie-dense processed foods encourage unnecessary purchasing and higher consumption, particularly among families with constrained budgets.
Also read: Not Just The Heart, Obesity In Midlife Could Be Just As Harmful To The Brain: Study
The proposed restrictions are expected to target promotions on HFSS foods, including multi-buy deals such as "buy one, get one free", volume-based discounts, and other promotional tactics that encourage purchasing larger quantities of unhealthy foods.
The initiative complements broader UK policies that are already being implemented, including restrictions on junk food advertising before 9 p.m. on television and a ban on paid online advertising for unhealthy foods.
These measures aim to reduce children's exposure to unhealthy food marketing and encourage healthier eating habits.
Northern Ireland's plans have received strong backing from public health organizations and health advocates.
Fearghal McKinney, Head of the British Heart Foundation Northern Ireland, said, "While we welcome the announcement of the first phase of the obesity programme as a significant step forward to support people living with obesity, this alone does not go far enough in providing a long-term and multi-department government solution."
He added, "Obesity is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease and a leading cause of the increasing number of deaths in Northern Ireland."
McKinney also said, "This announcement must be accompanied by urgent delivery of actions within the Healthy Futures obesity strategy, including publishing a consultation to restrict price promotions on unhealthy foods."
Across the UK, governments are increasingly focusing on reducing consumption of unhealthy food through marketing tactics rather than focusing on individual behavior change.
Announcing England's advertising restrictions, Health Minister Ashley Dalton said, "By restricting adverts for junk food before 9pm and banning paid adverts online, we can remove excessive exposure to unhealthy foods, making the healthy choice the easy choice for parents and children."
Northern Ireland's proposed promotion restrictions are still going through implementation stages, but health experts view them as positive step towards broader obesity prevention strategy.
Combined with better medical services, education and healthier food environments, policymakers hope the measures will reduce obesity rates, lower the burden of chronic disease and ease pressure on the healthcare system.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited