The current measles outbreak has gripped US states like Texas and New Mexico leaving people worried whether it would become a new pandemic. According to the Texas Department of State Health Services as of February 21, 90 cases were diagnosed in the last month in the South Plains area, with at least 77 of them were reported in children and teens under 17.

Measles is highly contagious and can be deadly. The outbreak, which started spreading in late January, has resulted in multiple hospitalizations, with at least nine confirmed cases and three probable cases as of early February. Health officials caution that at least one in five infected individuals will have to be hospitalized, highlighting the severity of the situation.

Misinformation surrounding vaccines and with the new Trump administration anti-vaccine campaigs, has causing parents to hesitate or refuse vaccination.

Furthermore, the country down under Australia is also witnessing a surge in measles cases as health officials in Sydney have issued an urgent alert, urging residents to watch for measles symptoms after an infected individual visited several places in Sydney over the last seven days.

Authorities report that the traveller had returned from South East Asia where there are ongoing outbreaks of measles.

What Are The Symptoms Measles?

Key symptoms of measles include fever, a runny nose, sore eyes, and a cough. Typically, a red, blotchy rash appears three to four days later, spreading from the head down to the body. Symptoms can manifest between 7 and 18 days after exposure.

Anyone who experiences these symptoms after potential exposure should immediately contact their doctor or emergency department. It is crucial to call ahead before visiting to avoid potentially exposing others in the waiting room. Dr. Selvey also highlighted that ongoing measles outbreaks are occurring in various parts of the world, making awareness and prompt action essential.

Why It Is Important To Get Vaccinated?

According to CDC everyone should get the MMR vaccine. It protects you from measles, mumps, and rubella. Getting vaccinated helps stop these diseases from spreading. There are two safe MMR vaccines available. They work the same way, so it doesn't matter which one you get. Kids can also get a shot that protects against chickenpox too, but this is only for children.

Who Should Get Vaccinated?

Kids Need Two Shots

All children should get two MMR shots. The first shot should be given when they are between 12 and 15 months old. The second shot should be given when they are between 4 and 6 years old. If needed, the second shot can be given earlier, but it must be at least 28 days after the first shot.

College Students Need to Be Protected

Students going to college or other schools after high school, need two shots if they are not already immune. The shots must be at least 28 days apart.

Adults Need at Least One Shot

Most adults need at least one MMR shot. Some adults need two shots, especially those who work in healthcare, travel a lot, or go to college. These people should get two shots, with 28 days between them.

Travelers Need to Be Extra Careful

Anyone traveling to other countries should make sure they are protected. Babies 6 to 11 months old should get one shot before traveling. Kids 12 months and older, teens, and adults need two shots, with 28 days between them.

Healthcare Workers Must Be Immune

People who work in healthcare should have proof that they are immune to measles, mumps, and rubella. If they are not immune, they need two MMR shots, spaced 28 days apart.

Women Thinking About Having Babies

Women who might get pregnant should talk to their doctor about the MMR vaccine. It's safe to get the shot while breastfeeding.

India’s latest cancer drug price revision has reduced the maximum retail prices (MRPs) of several anti-cancer medicines. While the average price reduction comes around to be more than 50%, roughly one in four of the listed drugs still remain unchanged.

Also, the overall decline across all products is only 13.8%, according to an analysis by the Working Group on Access to Medicines and Treatments.

The analysis examined 643 anti-cancer drugs that were a part of the revised price list issued by the National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority (NPPA). 484 products, or 75.27%, recorded a price reduction, while 159 products, accounting for 24.73%, remained unchanged.

Why Is Overall Price Reduction In Cancer Drugs Only 13.8%?

Also read: Top Neurologist Says Stroke Could Be First Sign of Undiagnosed Cancer: Red Flags to Know | Interview

Among products that became cheaper, the average price reduction was 50.78%. But when the combined listed MRPs of all 643 products were compared, the overall reduction was only 13.8%.

The difference between the two figures reflects the fact that many expensive cancer medicines have remained unaffected.

According to the working group’s analysis, the combined listed MRP of all 643 products fell from approximately ₹2.51 crore to ₹2.17 crore, marking a reduction of around ₹34.57 lakh.

However, the 159 products that recorded no price reduction accounted for 86.2% of the combined revised MRP value of the entire list.

“Of course, average can be misleading,” said KM Gopakumar, researcher with the Third World Network and co-convenor of the working group. “This weighted reduction gives us much more a realistic view.”

Expensive Cancer Drugs Remain Unchanged

Also read: Cancer Drug Prices Slashed For 543 Brands From Nov 9, But A Blockbuster Drug That Treats 21 Cancers Remains Untouched

The analysis found that several expensive cancer drug brands, including medicines manufactured by multinational pharmaceutical companies, retained their earlier MRPs. These include:

• Keytruda (pembrolizumab): The listed price remains ₹2,16,500 for a 100 mg injection.
• Tagrisso (osimertinib): The price remains approximately ₹4.16 lakh for a pack of 30 tablets.
• Avastin (bevacizumab): Roche’s 400 mg vial remains priced at ₹1,23,506.
• Alimta (pemetrexed): Eli Lilly’s 500 mg injection remains priced at ₹29,531.25.

The analysis also found that 110 of 122 products examined across 18 selected multinational pharmaceutical companies recorded no price reduction. Their average price reduction across all 122 products was just 1.3%.

On the other hand, several generic medicines recorded substantial cuts. For example, the price of a 400 mg bevacizumab vial sold as Bevacirel by Reliance Life Sciences fell by 83.27%, while Abbott Healthcare’s Bevacizab recorded an 86.26% reduction.

Call For Further Action

The Working Group on Access to Medicines and Treatments has urged the government to consider additional measures to improve access to expensive cancer medicines.

It has called for public health safeguards under Sections 92 and 100 of the Patents Act, which provide for compulsory licensing and government use of patented inventions in particular circumstances.

Such provisions can allow access to patented medicines under defined legal conditions when public health requirements warrant intervention.

The group has also questioned the trade margin framework, arguing that the margins remain high and that the government should disclose the calculations used to ascertain revised MRPs.

The NPPA introduced the latest intervention to address excessive trade margins and reduce the cost of cancer medicines.

Its October 28 list initially covered 543 brands, with subsequent updates expanding the coverage to 643 products.

The price revisions suggest that the overall impact remains limited because pricey drugs have not become cheaper. So patients who need expensive patented treatments, the latest price cuts may therefore offer little direct relief.

Barbados recently joined the list of 26 countries and territories that have been certified by the World Health Organization for eliminating mother-to-child-transmission (EMTCT) of HIV, syphilis or hepatitis B. 15 of these countries are in the Americas, which makes the region a global leader to achieve this feat.

The major public health milestone comes after years of sustained efforts to prevent mother-to-child-transmission of HIV.

Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General, said, “I congratulate Barbados on protecting a generation of children from HIV,” said “Barbados has shown what universal health coverage looks like in practice: free services for every pregnant woman, regardless of nationality, and care that respects her rights and privacy. With 15 countries and territories in the Americas now recognized, the region continues to show the world the way.”

How Did Barbados Prevent Mother-To-Child HIV Transmission?

Also read: Exclusive With Leading HIV Expert: What's Driving Rising HIV Cases Among India's Youth And How To Prevent It

The Caribbean country's achievement was backed by widespread coverage of antenatal care, HIV testing and antiretroviral treatment.

“Barbados has shown that eliminating mother-to-child transmission of HIV is possible when women and children have access to quality health services without barriers,” said Dr Jarbas Barbosa, Director of the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) and WHO Regional Director for the Americas.

“This achievement means that children are born free of HIV and that women living with HIV can access the care and treatment they need. It is a proud moment for Barbados, the Caribbean, and the global effort to end AIDS in children.”

During the three-year period, 98% of pregnant women received antenatal care, 98% were tested for HIV, and 98% of pregnant women living with HIV received antiretroviral treatment.

An essential step in Barbados' HIV elimination strategy is making HIV testing and treatment accessible to all pregnant women. Free HIV testing and treatment are available to all pregnant women regardless of race and nationality. These services are available through public clinics and hospitals.

“This is incredible for us, and it allows us to be able to see our children living their full, best lives. It allows mothers to be able to have the benefit of treatment during pregnancy, before treatment, but also, it means that we're able to ensure that we have a healthier population, and we're able to join the other countries around the globe that have also equally been able to achieve this historic milestone,” said Lisa Cummins, Minister of Health and Wellness of Barbados.

Additionally, pregnant women are offered voluntary and confidential HIV testing. Those who test positive are provided specialised care and treatment to reduce the risk of passing the virus to their babies.

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) is central to preventing mother-to-child HIV transmission. These medicines suppress HIV in the body, reducing the amount of virus in the blood. When an HIV+ pregnant woman receives ART, the risk of transmission to her baby can be reduced significantly.

Barbados also provides early testing and follow-up care for babies at risk of contracting HIV from their mothers.

Also read: 1 In 60 Adults In Fiji May Now Have HIV As Meth Use, Unsafe Injecting And Treatment Gaps Fuel Surge

How Does HIV Pass From Mother To Child?

HIV can be transmitted from a woman living with HIV to her child during pregnancy, childbirth or breastfeeding. This is known as vertical transmission or mother-to-child transmission.

Without preventive interventions, the risk of transmission can be significant. However, timely diagnosis, antiretroviral treatment during pregnancy and appropriate care around childbirth can substantially reduce this risk.

With effective treatment and appropriate medical support, women living with HIV can have children who are born without the infection.

The WHO certification recognises that Barbados has brought transmission down to a level at which it is no longer considered a public health problem. It does not mean that HIV has been eliminated from the country.

In a world first, scientists have administered AI-designed viruses to a human patient to treat a serious antibiotic-resistant bacterial infection. The experimental treatment marks a milestone in the development of personalized therapies that use artificial intelligence (AI) to design viruses capable of targeting drug-resistant bacteria.

California-based AI startup Radical Numerics announced the development in a blog post, saying a patient with a serious bacterial infection received an experimental treatment containing viruses generated by its AI model, Omnii-1.

How AI Helped Design the Viruses

Also read: AI Creates 16 Viruses To Kill Drug-Resistant E. coli, Raises Biosafety Concerns

The treatment uses bacteriophages, or phages, which are viruses that infect and kill bacteria. Phage therapy is being explored as an alternative when antibiotics fail, particularly in drug-resistant infections.

However, identifying phages that can effectively target the specific bacteria causing an individual patient's infection remains a major challenge.

Antibiotic resistance is a growing global health threat. A 2024 study published in The Lancet projected that bacterial antimicrobial resistance could directly cause 39.1 million deaths globally between 2025 and 2050.

Radical Numerics said it trained Omnii-1, its multimodal genome language model, to address the challenge of identifying and designing effective phages.

"We trained Omnii-1, our multimodal genome language model, to help bridge this gap. We demonstrate that it can generate viable phages, prioritize variants, and predict phage-host interactions," the company said.

"In the world's first clinical use of AI-generated phages, Omnii-1 designs were administered to a human patient under compassionate use," it added.

How Did the AI-Designed Phage Treatment Work?

Read More: Anthropic Says Claude Blocked Bird Flu, Chikungunya Research: How AI Could Enable Biological Misuse

According to the company, researchers tested the AI-designed viruses against bacteria obtained from the patient before administering the treatment. The resulting phage cocktail eliminated the patient's antibiotic-resistant bacterial sample in laboratory testing.

The treatment was administered under an authorized, physician-led compassionate-use pathway. Compassionate use allows patients with serious conditions to access investigational treatments outside clinical trials when satisfactory alternatives are unavailable, subject to regulatory authorization and appropriate oversight.

The report has not been peer-reviewed or published in a scientific journal. Company officials said the trial had been authorized by the Food and Drug Administration, the New York Times reported.

The company has not disclosed the patient's diagnosis, clinical course or treatment outcome, citing privacy concerns. It is therefore unclear whether the treatment successfully cleared the infection.

Eric Nguyen, chief executive officer of Radical Numerics, said the company was prioritizing patient confidentiality and intended to publish its findings through peer-reviewed research.

"We intend to publish our scientific findings through peer-reviewed research, with any future disclosure of clinical details subject to appropriate consent," he added.

The company said making phage therapy accessible to more patients would require reliable workflows for designing effective phages against individual bacterial infections.

Previous Research Used AI to Design Bacteria-Killing Viruses

The development comes amid growing interest in using AI to accelerate medical research, including the design of new biological therapies.

In August 2026, researchers at Stanford University and the Arc Institute announced that they had used AI to design previously unseen bacteriophages capable of killing E. coli bacteria in laboratory experiments.

Of nearly 300 AI-designed phages synthesized and tested, 16 produced functional viruses. However, these experiments were conducted in bacteria and did not involve human patients.

The Radical Numerics development goes a step further by reporting the clinical administration of AI-designed phages to a human patient.