(Credit-Canva)
The current measles outbreak has gripped US states like Texas and New Mexico leaving people worried whether it would become a new pandemic. According to the Texas Department of State Health Services as of February 21, 90 cases were diagnosed in the last month in the South Plains area, with at least 77 of them were reported in children and teens under 17.
Measles is highly contagious and can be deadly. The outbreak, which started spreading in late January, has resulted in multiple hospitalizations, with at least nine confirmed cases and three probable cases as of early February. Health officials caution that at least one in five infected individuals will have to be hospitalized, highlighting the severity of the situation.
Misinformation surrounding vaccines and with the new Trump administration anti-vaccine campaigs, has causing parents to hesitate or refuse vaccination.
Furthermore, the country down under Australia is also witnessing a surge in measles cases as health officials in Sydney have issued an urgent alert, urging residents to watch for measles symptoms after an infected individual visited several places in Sydney over the last seven days.
Authorities report that the traveller had returned from South East Asia where there are ongoing outbreaks of measles.
Key symptoms of measles include fever, a runny nose, sore eyes, and a cough. Typically, a red, blotchy rash appears three to four days later, spreading from the head down to the body. Symptoms can manifest between 7 and 18 days after exposure.
Anyone who experiences these symptoms after potential exposure should immediately contact their doctor or emergency department. It is crucial to call ahead before visiting to avoid potentially exposing others in the waiting room. Dr. Selvey also highlighted that ongoing measles outbreaks are occurring in various parts of the world, making awareness and prompt action essential.
According to CDC everyone should get the MMR vaccine. It protects you from measles, mumps, and rubella. Getting vaccinated helps stop these diseases from spreading. There are two safe MMR vaccines available. They work the same way, so it doesn't matter which one you get. Kids can also get a shot that protects against chickenpox too, but this is only for children.
All children should get two MMR shots. The first shot should be given when they are between 12 and 15 months old. The second shot should be given when they are between 4 and 6 years old. If needed, the second shot can be given earlier, but it must be at least 28 days after the first shot.
Students going to college or other schools after high school, need two shots if they are not already immune. The shots must be at least 28 days apart.
Most adults need at least one MMR shot. Some adults need two shots, especially those who work in healthcare, travel a lot, or go to college. These people should get two shots, with 28 days between them.
Anyone traveling to other countries should make sure they are protected. Babies 6 to 11 months old should get one shot before traveling. Kids 12 months and older, teens, and adults need two shots, with 28 days between them.
People who work in healthcare should have proof that they are immune to measles, mumps, and rubella. If they are not immune, they need two MMR shots, spaced 28 days apart.
Women who might get pregnant should talk to their doctor about the MMR vaccine. It's safe to get the shot while breastfeeding.
Credits: Canva
High levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), commonly called "bad" cholesterol, continue to be a leading modifiable risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) worldwide. While statins and other cholesterol-lowering medications have significantly improved treatment, many patients still do not reach the LDL-C targets recommended by guidelines.
However, a new potential solution has emerged. The experimental daily oral drug called enlicitide, part of the PCSK9 inhibitor class, demonstrated in a key Phase 3 study (CORALreef Lipids) a reduction in LDL-C of about 55.8% at 24 weeks, with post-hoc analysis suggesting reductions up to 59.7% compared to a placebo.
Statins are the standard first-line treatment for high LDL-C and have strong evidence for lowering the risk of cardiovascular events. Yet, many patients either cannot tolerate high doses or still have elevated cholesterol levels. Injectable PCSK9 inhibitors, which are monoclonal antibodies, address this gap and can lower LDL-C by up to 70% but are expensive, require injections, and have limited uptake.
Introducing an oral PCSK9 inhibitor could make powerful LDL-C reduction more accessible. According to trial data, enlicitide may achieve reductions similar to injectable options while being more convenient and potentially more widely available.
The CORALreef Lipids Phase 3 study involved 2,912 adults at risk of or with established ASCVD who were either already on lipid-lowering therapy or unable to take statins. Participants were randomly assigned to receive a daily 20 mg dose of oral enlicitide or a placebo. At 24 weeks, the main analysis showed an average LDL-C reduction of 55.8%, with a post-hoc reanalysis estimating 59.7%. The drug’s safety profile was similar to placebo, with no major safety concerns reported and low rates of discontinuation due to adverse effects.
These reductions are substantial, suggesting oral enlicitide could:
In India, where ASCVD prevalence is high and expensive therapies are less accessible, this pill could provide a practical, scalable option alongside diet, exercise, and current statin or ezetimibe treatments.
Despite the promising LDL-C reductions, several key issues remain:
The investigational oral pill enlicitide could represent a major advance in cholesterol management. For patients whose LDL-C remains high despite statins, or who cannot tolerate injections, it offers a potent and convenient alternative. Yet, medicine requires caution.
Disclaimer: This content is for general informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult a doctor or specialist before starting or changing any medication
Credits: Canva
According to NHS advice, people who use gabapentin may face rare emergencies linked to the medicine. Although it is not officially classed as a painkiller, doctors often prescribe it for nerve pain that follows an injury. It is also used for discomfort caused by shingles or diabetes. The medicine works by interrupting pain signals that move between the brain and spinal cord. Gabapentin is also a common treatment for epilepsy and falls under the group of anticonvulsant drugs. Most people take it as capsules, tablets, or a liquid, usually three times a day.
NHS information notes that the majority of users do not face any side effects. Those who do usually notice only mild and short-lived symptoms.
Gabapentin is a prescription drug that belongs to a group of medicines called anticonvulsants. Doctors usually give it to people who have nerve pain or to help manage certain types of seizures in epilepsy. It is sold under names like Neurontin, Gralise, and Horizant, along with widely used generic versions.
Gabapentin is prescribed for a few main purposes:
There are times when gabapentin may lead to serious reactions that need emergency attention. Mild effects can include an upset stomach, dry mouth, weight gain, or slight memory troubles.
More concerning reactions may involve thoughts of self-harm, unusual muscle pain or weakness, or seeing or hearing things that are not there. Even then, NHS guidance states that these usually require an urgent call to a doctor or 111 rather than ambulance help.
Like many medicines, gabapentin can trigger a severe allergic reaction known as anaphylaxis. This can cause several symptoms, such as swelling in the throat or difficulty breathing. The NHS advises calling 999 if you are taking gabapentin and experience any of the following:
Credits: Canva
Prostate Cancer Screening: A panel of government health experts in the UK has advised that routine prostate cancer screening should not be made available to most men, a decision that has drawn disappointment from several charities and campaigners.
The UK National Screening Committee (UKNSC) instead recommends targeted screening for men who carry a confirmed BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation. These gene variants are linked to a higher risk of aggressive prostate cancers at a younger age. Men in this high-risk group could undergo screening every two years between ages 45 and 61.
The committee concluded that offering prostate cancer screening to all men—or even those with a family history—would do more harm than good. While it might slightly reduce the number of deaths from prostate cancer, it could result in extensive overdiagnosis.
Screening for black men, who are known to have a higher risk of developing prostate cancer, was not recommended due to insufficient and uncertain evidence.
A major hurdle is the lack of strong evidence showing that mass prostate cancer screening significantly reduces deaths. The UK National Screening Committee (UKNSC) has determined that, at present, the potential harms of widespread testing outweigh the benefits, and therefore, a nationwide screening programme is not justified.
Health Secretary Wes Streeting said he would carefully review the draft recommendation, which will now undergo a 12-week consultation period before a final decision is presented to the government in March.
Prostate cancer remains the most common cancer among men, affecting one in eight, with around 55,300 new cases and 12,200 deaths each year in the UK. Despite being the second most common cancer overall after breast cancer, there is no routine screening program, partly because the PSA (prostate-specific antigen) test is not entirely reliable.
BRCA1 and BRCA2 are faulty genes that increase the risk of several cancers, including breast, pancreatic, ovarian, and prostate cancer. Around one in 300–400 people carries these mutations, and many are unaware of their status. Individuals with Jewish ancestry are at higher risk, with one in 40 Ashkenazi Jews and one in 140 Sephardi Jews carrying the faulty genes.
Men with a strong family history of cancer are encouraged to discuss blood or saliva testing with their GP. The proposed screening would likely only apply to a few thousand men due to the rarity of these gene mutations.
The UKNSC noted that screening black men or men with a family history of prostate cancer could result in significant overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Their modeling suggested that annual screening for black men aged 55–60 could lead to 44% of detected prostate cancers being overdiagnosed. Many of these cancers grow slowly and might never need treatment, but intervention could cause unnecessary anxiety and lifelong side effects, such as incontinence, erectile dysfunction, and bladder problems.
Six-time Olympic gold medallist Sir Chris Hoy has shared his “disappointment and sadness” after learning that the UKNSC has not recommended population-level prostate cancer screening. Despite this setback, Hoy remains committed to using his platform to advocate for earlier detection of the disease.
Since his own diagnosis, Hoy has actively campaigned for better screening measures to catch prostate cancer sooner. Today’s decision by the UKNSC, however, has temporarily delayed those efforts.
The committee’s decision has been met with mixed reactions. Cancer Research UK supported the cautious, evidence-based approach, noting that PSA testing can miss dangerous cancers and detect ones that do not require treatment. Prof Kamila Hawthorne, chair of the Royal College of GPs, also backed the committee’s decision, emphasizing that whole-population screening is not supported by current evidence.
However, charities like Prostate Cancer UK and Prostate Cancer Research, along with public figures including Stephen Fry and Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, expressed deep disappointment. They warned that excluding high-risk groups could lead to late diagnoses and preventable deaths.
Prostate Cancer Research criticized the exclusion of black men and those with family histories, calling it a “serious error” that could worsen health inequalities. Stephen Fry and Rishi Sunak both echoed disappointment, calling for broader screening. Former Prime Minister David Cameron also expressed concern, emphasizing the need for early detection to protect men and their families.
Health Secretary Wes Streeting reaffirmed that he wants evidence-backed screening and is committed to improving early detection and treatment for the most common cancers in men. He stated that progress is being made in reducing cancer waiting times, with 193,000 more patients diagnosed on time in the past year.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited