Measles Outbreak Cases Cross 100 Mark In US, Australia Sees Sudden Surge Of The Infectious Disease

Updated Feb 23, 2025 | 11:46 AM IST

SummaryMeasles continues to create havoc with over 100 people infected in US. New health guidelines and advisories are being issued to ensure people remain safe and vigilant.
(Credit-Canva)

(Credit-Canva)

The current measles outbreak has gripped US states like Texas and New Mexico leaving people worried whether it would become a new pandemic. According to the Texas Department of State Health Services as of February 21, 90 cases were diagnosed in the last month in the South Plains area, with at least 77 of them were reported in children and teens under 17.

Measles is highly contagious and can be deadly. The outbreak, which started spreading in late January, has resulted in multiple hospitalizations, with at least nine confirmed cases and three probable cases as of early February. Health officials caution that at least one in five infected individuals will have to be hospitalized, highlighting the severity of the situation.

Misinformation surrounding vaccines and with the new Trump administration anti-vaccine campaigs, has causing parents to hesitate or refuse vaccination.

Furthermore, the country down under Australia is also witnessing a surge in measles cases as health officials in Sydney have issued an urgent alert, urging residents to watch for measles symptoms after an infected individual visited several places in Sydney over the last seven days.

Authorities report that the traveller had returned from South East Asia where there are ongoing outbreaks of measles.

What Are The Symptoms Measles?

Key symptoms of measles include fever, a runny nose, sore eyes, and a cough. Typically, a red, blotchy rash appears three to four days later, spreading from the head down to the body. Symptoms can manifest between 7 and 18 days after exposure.

Anyone who experiences these symptoms after potential exposure should immediately contact their doctor or emergency department. It is crucial to call ahead before visiting to avoid potentially exposing others in the waiting room. Dr. Selvey also highlighted that ongoing measles outbreaks are occurring in various parts of the world, making awareness and prompt action essential.

Why It Is Important To Get Vaccinated?

According to CDC everyone should get the MMR vaccine. It protects you from measles, mumps, and rubella. Getting vaccinated helps stop these diseases from spreading. There are two safe MMR vaccines available. They work the same way, so it doesn't matter which one you get. Kids can also get a shot that protects against chickenpox too, but this is only for children.

Who Should Get Vaccinated?

Kids Need Two Shots

All children should get two MMR shots. The first shot should be given when they are between 12 and 15 months old. The second shot should be given when they are between 4 and 6 years old. If needed, the second shot can be given earlier, but it must be at least 28 days after the first shot.

College Students Need to Be Protected

Students going to college or other schools after high school, need two shots if they are not already immune. The shots must be at least 28 days apart.

Adults Need at Least One Shot

Most adults need at least one MMR shot. Some adults need two shots, especially those who work in healthcare, travel a lot, or go to college. These people should get two shots, with 28 days between them.

Travelers Need to Be Extra Careful

Anyone traveling to other countries should make sure they are protected. Babies 6 to 11 months old should get one shot before traveling. Kids 12 months and older, teens, and adults need two shots, with 28 days between them.

Healthcare Workers Must Be Immune

People who work in healthcare should have proof that they are immune to measles, mumps, and rubella. If they are not immune, they need two MMR shots, spaced 28 days apart.

Women Thinking About Having Babies

Women who might get pregnant should talk to their doctor about the MMR vaccine. It's safe to get the shot while breastfeeding.

End of Article

Injectable Contraceptive Or Copper IUD? Study Says Your Choice Of Birth Control May Not Influence HPV Risk

Updated Jul 6, 2026 | 02:00 PM IST

SummaryA recent study in The Lancet confirmed that a woman's choice of contraception does not increase her chances of contracting HPV.
Injectable Contraceptive Or Copper IUD? Study Says Your Choice Of Birth Control May Not Influence HPV Risk

Credit: AI

Women who are conflicted while choosing between an injectable contraceptive, a copper intrauterine device (IUD) or a hormonal implant may not need to worry about its impact on human papillomavirus (HPV).

What Is Human Papillomavirus (HPV)?

HPV is one of the most common sexually transmitted infections worldwide. While many HPV infections go away on their own without causing problems, some high-risk types can persist and increase the risk of cervical cancer in the long run.

Before this study, scientists debated whether hormonal contraceptives could affect a woman's immune response, making it easier to contract HPV or harder for the body to clear the infection.

Birth Control Choice May Not Influence HPV Risk

According to a new study published in The Lancet Regional Health – Africa, your choice of contraception may not have an impact on the risk of contracting HPV.

Researchers found that women using a commonly used injectable contraceptive known as depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-IM), copper IUDs, and levonorgestrel implants had similar chances of contracting HPV and clearing existing infections.

About The Lancet Study

Also read: You Can Still Get HPV If You're Not Sexually Active

The researchers examined data from women who participated in the large ECHO (Evidence for Contraceptive Options and HIV Outcomes) clinical trial. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three contraceptive methods:

  • Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-IM) injectable contraceptive

  • Copper IUD

  • Levonorgestrel implant

They then compared how often women acquired HPV during the study and how often those who already had HPV were able to clear the infection naturally. The analysis found no meaningful differences between the three contraceptive methods.

Women using the injectable contraceptive were no more likely to acquire HPV than those using a copper IUD or a hormonal implant. Similarly, women across all three groups cleared HPV infections at comparable rates.

Significance Of The Study

Also read: Teplizumab: UK NHS To Roll Out World-First Drug To Delay Onset Of Type 1 Diabetes

Earlier studies finding the link between hormonal contraceptives and HPV have reported mixed results. Some suggested that hormonal birth control might increase the risk of HPV infection or make infections last longer, while others found no clear outcomes.

This new research provides stronger evidence because it is based on a randomized clinical trial. The findings suggest that the type of contraceptive a woman chooses is unlikely to have an impact on her risk of getting HPV or her body's ability to clear the infection.

Women Can Take Control Of Their Contraceptive Choice

The study allows women to choose between these commonly used contraceptive methods based on factors such as effectiveness, convenience, side effects, and personal preference, rather than concerns about HPV risk.

However, experts stress that no contraceptive method protects against sexually transmitted infections, including HPV. Using condoms can help reduce the risk of HPV and other STIs.

The human papillomavirus causes more than 200 known infections. While some types lead to benign skin warts, others are responsible for severe health threats, such as cervical, throat, anal, and penile cancers. The HPV vaccine provides strong protection against the most lethal strains, avoiding long-term health complications.

The HPV vaccine helps the immune system recognize and fight off high-risk strains of the virus before they cause harm. It protects against:

  • Genital warts

  • Cervical cancer

  • Vaginal, vulvar, anal, and penile cancers

  • Mouth, throat, head, and neck cancers linked to HPV

Experts also stress that HPV vaccination and regular cervical cancer screening remain the most effective ways to prevent cervical cancer and detect abnormal changes early.

End of Article

Wegovy Weight Loss Pill Available in UK Pharmacies From Today: All You Should Know

Updated Jul 6, 2026 | 10:38 AM IST

SummaryAlthough Wegovy weight loss pill has received MHRA approval, it is not currently available through the NHS. The MHRA said NHS availability will depend on the usual evaluation process by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE).
Wegovy Weight Loss Pill Available in UK Pharmacies From Today: All You Should Know

Credit: www.wegovy.com

People in the UK can, from today, access the Wegovy weight loss pill through pharmacies with a doctor's prescription. It is the first oral glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) medicine approved in the UK for weight loss.

The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) approved the tablet on June 11, marking the first oral GLP-1 treatment available in the country for obesity management.

"Having met the MHRA's rigorous standards of safety, quality and effectiveness, the semaglutide tablet has been approved in the UK for weight loss and weight management," Julian Beach, Executive Director of Healthcare Quality and Access at the MHRA, said in a statement.

"As with all GLP-1 receptor agonists, this is a prescription-only medication," Beach added.

Novo Nordisk called it an "important milestone for obesity care in the UK".

"For the first time, people living with obesity have access to a GLP-1 treatment in a daily pill, allowing them the choice and flexibility of oral treatment to support their long-term weight management," said Sebnem Avsar Tuna, General Manager at Novo Nordisk UK.

Wegovy Weight Loss Pill: Who Is Eligible?

Also read: US Medicare Set To Cover GLP-1 Drugs For Weight Loss: All You Should Know About Eligibility, Costs

The semaglutide (Wegovy) tablet can be prescribed alongside a reduced-calorie diet and increased physical activity for adults who:

  • Have obesity (BMI of 30 or above), or
  • Are overweight (BMI between 27 and 30) and have at least one weight-related comorbidity.

Wegovy Weight Loss Pill Dosage

Patients must begin with the lowest dose of 1.5 mg once daily, which can be gradually increased to:

  • 4 mg
  • 9 mg
  • 25 mg
Each dose level should be taken for at least one month before moving to the next.

People currently taking 2.4 mg weekly semaglutide injections privately can switch directly to 25 mg semaglutide tablets once daily.

Wegovy: How To Take The Tablet

Read More: This 45-Minute Weight-Loss Procedure May Work Better Than Semaglutide Pills, Study Claims

According to the MHRA, the tablet should be:

  • Taken whole on an empty stomach after fasting for at least eight hours.
  • Swallowed with a small sip of water.
  • Followed by no food or drink for at least 30 minutes, as eating or drinking sooner reduces the drug's absorption.

Patients are advised to carefully follow the instructions in the Patient Information Leaflet.

How Does Wegovy Work?

Semaglutide is a GLP-1 receptor agonist that mimics the action of the naturally occurring GLP-1 hormone released after eating.

It acts on areas of the brain that regulate appetite by:

  • Helping people feel fuller for longer.
  • Reducing hunger.
  • Decreasing food cravings.
Combined with diet and lifestyle changes, this helps support long-term weight loss.

Wegovy: Is It Available On The NHS?

Not yet. Although the medicine has received MHRA approval, it is not currently available through the NHS.

The MHRA said NHS availability will depend on the usual evaluation process by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE).

NICE said Novo Nordisk has not yet formally approached it, but that it is in active discussions with the company, BBC reported.

Wegovy Weight Loss Pill: What Are The Side Effects?

The most commonly reported side effects are gastrointestinal and include:

  • Nausea
  • Diarrhea
  • Constipation
  • Vomiting

The MHRA said it will continue to monitor the medicine's safety and effectiveness. Anyone experiencing side effects should speak to their doctor, pharmacist, or nurse and report them through the MHRA Yellow Card scheme.

Pharmacies Expect High Demand

Community pharmacies say they are preparing for a surge in demand following the launch. The National Pharmacy Association (NPA) urged patients to obtain the medicine only from regulated pharmacies following a proper clinical consultation.

End of Article

Ebola Deaths In DRC Top 500 With At Least 1528 Cases Reported; What Makes This Outbreak Different & Deadlier?

Updated Jul 6, 2026 | 08:17 AM IST

SummaryAs Congo continues to battle Bundibugyo Ebola virus, we take a look at why the recent outbreak is more than a public health emergency.
Ebola Deaths In DRC Top 500 With At Least 1528 Cases Reported; What Makes This Outbreak Different & Deadlier?

Credit: AI

The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) is battling one of its deadliest Ebola outbreaks in recent years. While it is driving innovation in medical science with new clinical trials and diagnostic tests, it is also a stark reminder of the urgency to contain the outbreak as soon as possible.

What Makes This Ebola Outbreak Deadlier?

According to the latest data, the death toll in DRC has now crossed 500 with at least 1,528 cases that are reported and confirmed.

While Ebola is not a new disease, the current outbreak stands apart because it is being caused by a rare strain of the virus, Bundibugyo.

Unlike previous outbreaks dominated by the Zaire strain of Ebola, the current epidemic, caused by the Bundibugyo virus, is a much less common species of the Ebola virus family.

The rarity of the strain has created unique scientific and emergency public health challenges, as there is currently no licensed vaccine designed to protect against Bundibugyo Ebola virus.

During outbreaks caused by the Zaire strain, vaccination became an important part of outbreak control. In the current epidemic, however, public health officials are being forced to rely heavily on rapid diagnosis, infection prevention, surveillance, and existing medical care.

Read more: Legionnaires' Disease Outbreak Grips NYC After At Least 14 Cases Reported Across 2 Neighborhoods

Bundibugyo Ebola Virus: Latest Developments

WHO Clears First Diagnostic Test

In a major scientific breakthrough, the World Health Organization (WHO) recently added the first molecular diagnostic test for the Bundibugyo Ebola virus to its Emergency Use Listing (EUL).

The test detects the virus's genetic material in blood samples, enabling laboratories to confirm infections more quickly and accurately.

First Treatment Trial Underway

WHO and its partners have launched the first clinical trial specifically evaluating treatments for Bundibugyo Ebola virus disease.

Researchers are testing the experimental monoclonal antibody MBP134, the antiviral drug remdesivir, and a combination of both to determine whether they can improve survival.

About Bundibugyo Ebola Virus

The Bundibugyo virus was first identified in Uganda in 2007 and has caused only a few outbreaks since then. As infections have been relatively uncommon compared to the Zaire strain, researchers have had limited opportunities to develop vaccines, treatments and diagnostic tests.

Due to this, healthcare workers have been compelled to rely primarily on rapid isolation of patients, intensive supportive care, contact tracing, and strict infection prevention measures to slow transmission.

Currently, Eastern DRC is the hotspot for the Bundibugyo Ebola outbreak, where conflict, population displacement, skepticism, and insecurity have made it difficult for health workers to reach affected locations.

Here, access to healthcare still remains uneven in many areas. Additionally, movement of people across districts and states in the country can accelerate the spread of infection significantly.

As scientists race to validate new diagnostics and evaluate experimental treatments, the Bundibugyo outbreak is becoming more than a public health emergency. It is also serving as a critical test of how quickly the global health community can develop and deploy new tools against an emerging infectious disease.

End of Article