“I'm not great at the advice. Can I interest you in a sarcastic comment?”

This is what ‘Friends’ actor Matthew Perry’s character Chandler Bing was known for. He was known for being funny. However, he had his own struggles in his personal life and those struggles were acute depression. He was treating it with ketamine infusion therapy which is legal in the US and the UK.

What is Ketamine infusion therapy?

Ketamine is an anaesthetic used to treat depression, anxiety and pain under supervised and controlled medical settings. However, it does have its side effects, which can lead to distortion of sight, sound and time. It can also produce calming and relaxing effects.

Ketamine increases a person’s heart rate and blood pressure. If overdosed, it can leave users confused and agitated and can cause them to hurt themselves without even realising it. It can also lead to liver damage and bladder problems.

However, when used in moderation and under the supervision of medical doctors, it can treat depression where traditional antidepressants have failed.

Prof Rupert McShane, a University of Oxford psychiatrist who runs an NHS ketamine treatment clinic told BBC that ketamine “probably turns off the area of the brain that is involved in disappointment.”

Can Ketamine Infusion Therapy Kill Someone?

In simple terms, it cannot, be if the dosage is given in a controlled setting and as prescribed. Ketamine infusion therapy uses drugs in small doses than those used for anaesthesia. It acts faster than traditional anti-depressants, but the effects also wear off way quickly. Which is why it is important to monitor patients’ mental state for relapsing back into depression and discouraging them from overdosing on it.

There are ways of giving people ketamine. One of the ways is through “infusing”, which means to use an IV drip. However, injections, nasal sprays and capsules are also methods used to give people ketamine.

Since the dosage of ketamine used in the infusion treatment is small, it being the reason of actor Perry’s death was ruled out. The medical examiner also noted that Perry’s last ketamine infusion therapy session happened more than a week before his death, which means by the time he had died, it must have worn off.

So, What Happened To Perry?

Though Perry’s last session was more than a week before, his post-mortem showed that his blood contained a high concentration of ketamine. He had died of the “acute effects” of ketamine.

If it was not his session, then how did he get ketamine?

Prosecutors alleged that his assistant gave him at least 27 shots of ketamine in four days before his death, reported BBC.

Perry has been open about his personal struggles and this is what the doctors and dealers used against him. Martin Estrada, the US attorney for California’s Central District told the BBC that people took advantage of his condition. They charged him 165 times more than what vials of ketamine cost.

Names that have come up include Dr Salvador Plasencia, drug dealers “Ketamine Queen” aka Jasveen Sangha and Eric Fleming, and Perry’s live-in assistant Kenneth Iwamasa.

Who Are These Names And What Did They Do?

Ketamine Queen or Sangha supplied drugs that led to Perry’s death. Her home was a “drug-selling emporium,” said Estrada. More than 80 vials of ketamine, and thousands of pills including methamphetamine, cocaine and Xanax were allegedly found in her house known as the “Sangha Stash House.”

Sangha is known to deal with high-end celebs and was a “major source of supply for ketamine to others as well as Perry,” said Estrada.

Dr Plasencia called Perry a “moron” while charging him $2,000 for vials that cost only $12. He sold Perry 20 vials of ketamine between September and October 2023, costing $55,000.

He was the one who taught Iwamasa, who had no medical knowledge to inject the drug. This is after he knew that “Perry’s ketamine addiction was spiralling out of control,” as per what the investigators told the BBC.

Another dealer Fleming was told by Sangha to “delete all our messages.” While Fleming pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute drugs unlawfully, he also allegedly messaged Sangha: “Please call...Got more info and want to bounce ideas off you. I’m 90% sure everyone is protected. I never dealt with [Perry] only his assistant. So the assistant was the enabler.”

The court documents also revealed that he asked Sangha on whether the ketamine stays in your system or “is it immediately flushed out.”

Dr Pepper, Bots, Cans

The people who allegedly exploited Perry used coded language for ketamine and called it “Dr Pepper”, “bots”, or “cans.”

Selling overpriced drugs, taking advantage of Perry’s mental condition and falsifying medical records to make the drugs given to him look legitimate by Dr Plasencia is what took Perry’s life.

Iwamasa is said to have administered more than 20 shots of ketamine and three on the day Perry died. Whereas ketamine is only administered by a physician. Authorities also found that weeks before Perry’s death, Dr Plasencia allegedly bought 10 vials of ketamine and intended to sell to Perry.

He also injected Perry with a large dose, two days later. This caused him to “freeze up” and spiked his blood pressure.

When I Die, I Want Helping Others To Be The First Thing That’s Mentioned

Perry had always been open about his drug addictions, struggles with alcohol and his depression. He said that his openness would help others who are also struggling and wanted to be remembered by his quote which also is on the homepage of the Mattew Perry Foundation that helps others struggling with the disease of addiction: “When I die, I want helping others to be the first thing that’s mentioned.”

Five arrests have been made in the case so far.

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is preparing to announce a crackdown on children's access to social media within days. A speech from the prime minister, which is expected to include a new policy on social media, is planned for next week.

The UK is the latest country considering restrictions on social media use among those under the age of 16 amid growing concerns about mental health, online abuse, and child protection.

Several countries have introduced or proposed regulations on children's access to social media as concerns mount over the impact of these platforms on young people's health and safety.

A look at the countries planning to implement social media ban:

Australia: Banned social media for children under 16, including TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, and YouTube.

China: Uses a "minor mode" system that limits screen time and access based on a child's age.

Denmark: Plans to ban social media for children under 15, with limited parental exceptions for those aged 13–14.

France: Approved a bill to ban social media for children under 15, pending final legislative approval.

Germany: Children aged 13–16 can use social media only with parental consent.

Greece: Preparing to introduce a social media ban for children under 15.

India: Karnataka has banned social media for children under 16. Other states like Andhra Pradesh, Goa, and Bihar are considering age restrictions.

Italy: Children under 14 need parental consent to create social media accounts.

Malaysia: Barred users under 16 from registering new social media accounts.

Norway: Proposed raising the minimum age for social media consent from 13 to 15 and introducing a 15-year minimum age limit.

Poland: Drafted legislation to ban social media for children under 15 and require age verification.

Slovenia: Preparing a law that would prohibit social media access for children under 15.

Spain: Plans to ban social media access for minors under 16 and require age verification.

Sweden: A government commission has recommended a minimum social media age of 15.

Turkey: Passed legislation banning social media use by children under 15.

United States: Several states require parental consent for minors, while federal legislation seeks stronger protections for young users.

European Union: Considering stricter child safety rules, including parental consent for under-16s and a ban for children under 13.

Will A Blanket Ban on Social Media Work?

Also read: Is India Set To Implement A Social Media Ban For Children?

Blocking children from social media is no substitute for making platforms safe in the first place, the UN human rights office warned last month.

"Online harms to children's safety, privacy, and wellbeing result from design choices and business practices that undermine safety, including addictive features such as infinite scroll, autoplay, and persistent notifications," said UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk.

Türk cautioned that such bans can be easily circumvented and risk pushing children towards riskier, less-monitored spaces.

"Simply limiting access to platforms that remain unsafe cannot stand as the endpoint," he said.

The UN Office also issued a 10-point framework urging governments and technology companies to go further and faster in protecting children online. The guidelines, titled Getting Children's Safety Online Right, come as age-based social media restrictions proliferate worldwide. It includes:

• Embedding child safety measures directly into platform design from the outset.

• Not leaving parents and children solely responsible for managing online risks.

• Conducting mandatory child-rights impact assessments for digital platforms.

• Implementing tightly regulated age-verification systems to protect privacy.

• Consulting children meaningfully when developing online safety regulations and policies.

Read More: Mayim Bialik Says Just One GLP-1 Shot Triggered ‘Nightmare’ Side Effects

"The intent to protect young minds from addiction, misinformation, and harmful content is welcome. However, effectiveness will depend less on restricting children and more on regulating platforms," Dr. Rajendra Pratap Gupta, Chairman of Health Parliament, creator of SHE App, and former adviser to the Union Health Minister, told HealthandMe.

"Stronger platform accountability, age-appropriate design, and algorithmic responsibility are crucial. Combined with digital literacy and parental awareness, oversight and control, such measures can create a healthier digital ecosystem. Without platform control, regulations risk remaining largely symbolic," Dr. Gupta said.

With inputs from Reuters

West Bengal today became the 36th state to implement the Indian government's flagship health insurance scheme, Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (AB PM-JAY).

The scheme aims to achieve universal health coverage and ensure seamless access to quality healthcare for every eligible citizen across the country.

The National Health Authority (NHA), under the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW), signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Department of Health and Family Welfare, Government of West Bengal, for the implementation of AB PM-JAY in the state.

Over 12 Crore Treatments Availed Under PM-JAY

“Beneficiaries under the AB PM-JAY scheme have availed over 12 crore treatments worth more than Rs 1.82 lakh crore, providing substantial financial protection to poor and vulnerable families,” said JP Nadda, Union Health Minister.

He noted that one of the most significant outcomes of the government's efforts has been the reduction in out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure, which has declined from 64.6 per cent before 2018 to 43.4 per cent today.

Nadda further stated that AB PM-JAY has enabled timely access to quality healthcare through a cashless, paperless, and fully digital platform.

Referring to findings published in The Lancet, he noted that nearly 90 per cent of eligible cancer patients under the scheme were able to access treatment within 30 days, demonstrating the program's role in improving timely healthcare access.

Who Will Benefit From AB PM-JAY in West Bengal?

Also read: India working on grand preventive and holistic health vision: PM Modi

Chief Minister of West Bengal Suvendu Adhikari noted that under the National Health Mission has recently released Rs 527 crore to the state, which will further support healthcare infrastructure and service delivery.

The scheme will cover:

• 1.43 crore families in total
• 1.24 crore eligible beneficiary families
• Around 3.06 lakh families of ASHAs, Anganwadi workers, and helpers
• Nearly 15.95 lakh families of senior citizens aged 70 years and above

Anupriya Patel, Minister of State for Health and Family Welfare, said that AB PM-JAY is not merely a health scheme but a transformative initiative that has brought financial protection and healthcare security to millions of vulnerable families across India.

She noted that AB PM-JAY, "now covers more than 62 crore people, including poor and vulnerable families, senior citizens aged 70 years and above, and gig and platform workers" in India.

Achievements include:

• More than 44 crore Ayushman Cards have been created.
• Over 12 crore hospital admissions have been authorised under the scheme.
• Women are accounting for nearly half of all beneficiaries.

What Is Ayushman Bharat PM-JAY?

Read More: India AI Summit: Union Health Minister Nadda Launches SAHI And BODH Initiatives To Boost AI In Healthcare

Ayushman Bharat PM-JAY was launched in September 2018 and has since emerged as the world's largest government-funded health assurance programme.

The scheme provides health coverage of Rs 5 lakh per family per year for secondary and tertiary care hospitalization. It covers around 12 crore families, representing the bottom 40 per cent of India's population.

The program was later expanded to include 6 crore senior citizens aged 70 years and above, belonging to 4.5 crore families, irrespective of their socio-economic status.

In a major crackdown on social media use among those under the age of 16, the UK government, led by Prime Minister Keir Starmer, is preparing to curb children's access to harmful content online.

In recent weeks, the government has examined a variety of options for restrictions, including a blanket ban on under-16s accessing social media, similar to measures introduced in Australia and Karnataka in India.

Why Is the UK Considering a Social Media Ban?

The proposed plan comes amid growing concerns about mental health, online abuse, and child protection.

Several studies have linked excessive social media use to increased social isolation, sleep loss, higher stress levels, reduced physical activity, and less time spent outdoors, all of which can have significant health consequences.

In addition, concerns about children's online exploitation, cyberbullying, and exposure to inappropriate content have fueled calls for stricter regulations. Another key concern is the rise of online grooming, sextortion, and harmful content that can be accessed by children through social media and other digital services.

The government has been since months reviewing evidence on how social media affects young users and whether certain platform features encourage addictive behavior. Policymakers are also examining the role of algorithms that promote endless scrolling and prolonged engagement, The Sunday Guardian reported.

Which Social Media Apps Could Be Affected?

Also read: Is India Set To Implement A Social Media Ban For Children?

The UK government is yet to make the final decision and publish an official list of social media platforms that would be restricted if the proposed rules move forward. However, reports suggest that platforms considered to pose higher risks to children could face tighter age restrictions. This include:

• TikTok
• Instagram
• Snapchat
• X
• Facebook
• Discord
• Reddit

UK May Block Children From Sharing Explicit Images

Also read: Should Parents Limit Social Media For Teens? New Study Shows It Is Lowering Their Memory Score

Beyond social media restrictions, the government is also looking at measures aimed at preventing children from creating, sharing, or viewing explicit images on smartphones and other devices.

Prime Minister Starmer has given major technology companies, including Apple and Google, a three-month deadline to introduce stronger safeguards designed to protect children from online exploitation and sextortion.

“When it comes to the safety of our children, standing by is not an option,” he said, while speaking at London Tech Week

The proposed system would require adults to undergo verification before sending, receiving, or accessing explicit content, while technology companies could face penalties if they fail to implement the required protections.

The move is designed to address the growing problem of children being pressured into sharing intimate images that are later used for blackmail or abuse.

Social Media Ban in Australia And India

Anyone under the age of 16 in Australia is now banned from using social media services. These platforms include TikTok, X, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Snapchat, and Threads. Under the law, people under 16 cannot create new social media accounts, and their existing accounts will be deactivated.

In India, Karnataka became the first state to announce plans for a broad restriction on social media use among teenagers. Andhra Pradesh and Bihar have also been considering similar measures aimed at restricting social media use among children.