Credits: Canva
After mpox outbreak, Africa is under the threat of yet another virus outbreak, this is the Marburg virus outbreak in Rwanda. So far, six people have died from the outbreak, confirmed the health minister. Most victims were the healthcare workers in the hospital's intensive care unit. As per reports, 20 cases have been identified since the outbreak was confirmed on Friday.
With the fatality rate of 8% it is the same virus family as Ebola. The main carrier is from fruit bats which spreads to humans then through the contact of bodily fluids of infected individuals, it spreads to others.
The common signs and symptoms of the Marburg virus include fever, pain, diarrhoea, vomiting and in the case of extreme blood loss, death too can happen.
So far, there is no specific treatment or vaccine for the virus. However, treatments like drugs and immune therapy are being developed as per the World Health Organisation (WHO).
Rwanda says that it has intensified its contact tracing, surveillance and testing to contain the spread. It has also tracked about 300 people who had come into contact with individuals affected by the Marburg virus.
The health minister has urged people to stay vigilant and avoid any physical contact and to wash their hands with clean water, soap or sanitiser and report any suspected case.
As of now, most of the cases have spread to the capital in Kigali. In light of this, the US Embassy in the city has advised its employees to work remotely for the next week.
This is the first time Rwanda has confirmed for Marburg cases, before this, in 2023, Tanzania confirmed the outbreak, whereas three people had died of this in Uganda in 2017.
As per WHO, this virus kills half of the people it infects. In the previous outbreaks, it has killed between 24% to 88% of the patients.
The virus was first detected in 1976 after 31 people were infected, out of which 7 died in simultaneous outbreak in Marburg and Frankfurt in Germany, and Belgrade in Serbia.
The source was traced to African green monkeys who were imported from Uganda. However, other animals too are linked to the virus spread, including bats.
In the past, the virus outbreaks have happened in countries like Equatorial Guinea, Ghana, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Kenya, South Africa, Uganda, and Zimbabwe. In 2005, this virus killed 300 people in Angola.
However, for the rest of the world, only two people have died from the virus in the rest of the world, with one of them being in Europe, and the other in the US. These both have been on expeditions to caves in Uganda.
Credit: Ministry of Commerce & Industry
In a landmark deal, India and New Zealand today signed the India- New Zealand Free Trade Agreement (IN- NZ FTA).
The Agreement was signed by Union Minister of Commerce and Industry Piyush Goyal and New Zealand’s Minister for Trade and Investment Todd McClay at Bharat Mandapam, New Delhi.
The FTA will not only strengthen India’s global economic partnerships but also boost strategic opportunities for the medical devices sector, as well as the country's traditional medicine sector.
In a post on social media platform X, Prime Minister Narendra Modi highlighted the agreement’s "role in promoting traditional knowledge systems, including AYUSH, yoga and organic products, positioning them for greater global relevance".
"The FTA broadens its scope to agriculture productivity, organics, services, mobility, Ayush, and pharma access, making the opportunities all-inclusive and future-oriented," added Commerce Secretary Rajesh Agrawal.
For the first time, New Zealand has facilitated trade in Ayurveda, yoga, and other traditional medicine services with India. This landmark provision promotes the global recognition of India’s AYUSH systems, supports medical value travel, and encourages collaboration in wellness services, according to an official statement.
It also reinforces India’s position as a global hub for health, wellness, and traditional medicine services. It gives centre stage to India’s AYUSH disciplines (Ayurveda, Yoga & Naturopathy, Unani, Sowa-Rigpa, Siddha, and Homeopathy) alongside Maori Health practices.

In a major breakthrough, the FTA streamlines access for pharmaceuticals and medical devices by enabling acceptance of GMP and GCP inspection reports from comparable regulators, including approvals by the US FDA, EMA, UK MHRA, Health Canada, and other comparable regulators.
"These will reduce duplicative inspections, lower compliance costs, and expedite product approvals, thereby facilitating smoother market access and supporting growth of India’s pharmaceutical and medical devices exports to New Zealand," it added.

The experts hailed the India–New Zealand FTA, calling it a strategic opportunity for the medical devices sector.
"For the healthcare and MedTech sector, the agreement is particularly consequential. A dedicated annex on pharmaceuticals and medical devices creates expedited regulatory pathways, with New Zealand agreeing to recognize GMP and GCP inspection reports from the US FDA, the EU’s EMA, and the UK’s MHRA—reducing duplicative compliance burdens and accelerating product approvals for Indian manufacturers," said Pavan Choudary, Chairman, Medical Technology Association of India (MTaI), in a statement.
"A separate annex on health services and traditional medicine opens structured avenues for medical value travel, digital health, and evidence-based AYUSH, positioning India not merely as a goods exporter, but as a global wellness and healthcare services hub," he added.
Rajiv Nath, Forum Coordinator, Association of Indian Medical Devices Industry (AiMeD), also welcomed the India-New Zealand FTA and said that the reduced tariffs and streamlined regulatory cooperation will boost exports.
It will also "enable technology partnerships, and support affordable access to quality devices. The pact enhances competitiveness for Indian manufacturers while ensuring resilient supply chains and mutual recognition standards, strengthening India’s position as a global MedTech hub," Nath added.
However, Choudary cited that there is a significant gap. He cited that the FTA’s regulatory recognition framework does not yet include India’s Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO).
"As India’s pharmaceutical and MedTech industry grows in scale, quality, and global reach, the CDSCO is rapidly maturing into a credible, reference-class regulator. Its inclusion in such bilateral recognition frameworks is not a diplomatic nicety; it is a commercial and strategic imperative. Future trade agreements, and indeed revisions to this one, must correct this omission," the expert said.
Breast cancer cases are on the rise in India, primarily because of lifestyle choices. (Photo credit: AI generated)
A new analysis by researchers at the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) points to a mixed picture when it comes to cancer trends in India. While cases of breast cancer and oral cancer in men have been steadily rising over the years, cervical cancer has seen a sharp decline—one of the few clear positives in the data.
The study, published in the Journal of Public Health, looked at patterns across G20 countries over roughly two decades. Researchers used a method that helps separate the effects of ageing from broader social and behavioural changes. In simple terms, it allowed them to see whether cancer risk itself is increasing, or if higher numbers are just a result of people living longer.
For India, the rise in certain cancers is difficult to ignore. Breast cancer cases have been increasing by around 1.8 per cent each year, while oral cancer in men has gone up by about 1.2 per cent annually. These trends stand in contrast to several high-income countries, where rates have either slowed or, in some cases, begun to fall.
The reason why breast cancer cases are surging in India is not surprising - with the shift in lifestyle choices, it is almost a no-brainer. Rising obesity, sedentary lifestyle, smoking and alcohol use are some of the key contributors. Reproductive patterns, too, have changed - women are planning pregnancies later, breastfeeding for short duration and also experiencing early onset of periods. While these factors may appear insignificant individually, they collectively play a huge role in the long run.
Oral cancer tells a different story—one that is closely tied to India’s long-standing tobacco habits. The use of smokeless tobacco and betel quid continues to be widespread, particularly among men. Alcohol adds to the risk. What makes the situation worse is that many cases are picked up late, often when the disease is already advanced. The data also shows a clear age pattern: men and women have similar rates until about 40, after which the numbers for men rise sharply.
If there is one area where India has made real progress, it is cervical cancer. The study found that incidence has been dropping by over 4 per cent each year, one of the steepest declines among the countries analysed. Experts attribute this to better awareness, improved hygiene, and gradual improvements in reproductive health services over time.
This decline offers a useful lesson. It shows that sustained public health efforts can make a difference. The recent rollout of HPV vaccination for adolescent girls could push these numbers down even further in the coming years.
The ICMR report also highlights a big concern - in developed countries, cancer risk decreases with the new generation because of improved diagnosis and treatment infrastructure. However, in India, the pattern is not evident enough - risk appears high across age groups, but the diagnosis and treatment bit is not well taken care of. Lack of mortality data in India is a key concern, which makes it hard to assess how the rising numbers translate to heightened death risk. The trend is still strong enough to require immediate intervention.
Researchers say the response cannot be one-dimensional. Expanding access to screening, especially for breast cancer, is crucial. Tobacco and alcohol control policies need to be enforced more effectively to tackle oral cancer. At the same time, the gains seen in cervical cancer underline the importance of vaccination and organised screening programmes.
Credit: iStock
India's Supreme Court has revamped guidelines for intensive care units (ICUs) across the country, and the top court has also asked all the states and Union Territories to prepare a “realistic and practical” action plan to implement the guidelines necessary as a minimum standard for intensive care units.
As per the new draft guidelines, set to be implemented from mid-May, patients who are stable and no longer need critical support will be shifted out of ICUs to wards or other care units.
The guidelines, prepared by a three-member court-appointed committee and reviewed by leading medical experts, were endorsed by the apex court as “practical, implementable, and necessary as a minimum standard for an ICU,” The Hindustan Times reported.
A bench of Justices Ahsanuddin Amanullah and R Mahadevan said copies of the guidelines should be shared with all the states and UTs.
“Moving further, as an immediate measure, let all the additional chief secretaries/secretaries … heading the department of health and medical education in the states and the UTs, convene a meeting of all experts involved in this exercise to prepare an action plan for implementation of the guidelines. Such a plan shall be realistic and practical,” the bench said in its order.
They also call for round-the-clock monitoring by resident doctors working in shifts, under the supervision of specialists with postgraduate qualifications recognized by the National Medical Council.
The SC bench had urged for a meeting of all concerned to discuss and prepare a final common guideline, which shall then be circulated to all states and UTs.
“A final report/blueprint/recommendation shall be prepared, which shall be placed before this court on the next date,” it said, adding that the entire exercise should be completed within three weeks.
“Let the Ministry of Health, Government of India, formally issue the guidelines placed before us today, to the states and UTs concerned by way of an advisory. A copy of it shall also be uploaded on the website of the Ministry of Health, Government of India,” the bench said, while posting the matter for further hearing on May 18.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited