Credits: Canva
Japan could become one of the first countries in the world to end the HIV epidemic, says the president of Gilead Sciences Japan, Kennet Brysting. The idea for now could seem a little too ambitious, but it is not entirely unrealistic, given that the availability of medicines that can prevent transmission of HIV. Drugs are not the cure, but control over the spread of virus to the point where the disease is no longer a major public health threat.
Gilead's have two key drugs, Truvada and lenacapavir. These two are playing a crucial role in prevention. Truvada is taken as a daily pill, while lenacapavir requires two injections per year. It can make the virus undetectable in infected individuals and prevent transmission to those who are not infected yet. In trials, lenacapavir showed 100% efficacy in preventing HIV infections. This is why it is describe as "almost a vaccine".
In 2024, Japan also approved Truvada for HIV prevention, but the country has yet to approve lenacapavir for the same. Until now, people in Japan had been importing generic versions of Truvada or purchasing it from clinics that source it from overseas.
Up until now, Japan reported around 25,000 HIV infections, whereas 669 new cases were reported in 2023. For seven consecutive years, the number of new infections remained under 1,000. The downward trend thus shows that the virus has been controlled, however, getting to zero new infections remains the ultimate goal.
Brysting too acknowledged that simply having effective drug is not enough. What is important is to have a proper implementation, access and healthcare support to make sure that these treatments are widely available and effective.
The biggest challenges is testing rates. There is a need to increase testing rates. At this very moment, around 86% people infective with Japan have been tested, but the goal is to increase it up to 95%, with an ideal goal of 100%. Without widespread testing, many infected people may not even know that they are infected and it could transmit the virus.
Another measure issue is the cost of preventative medication. While Japan's health insurance covers treatments for diseases, it does not cover preventative drugs. Those who purchase Truvada for prevention, pay around $470 per month. Some clinics in Tokyo offer generic alternatives too, which is cheaper, but they are not ideal.
Brysting expressed concern that individuals importing medications might not be consulting doctors regularly, which is essential for monitoring HIV status and overall health. Truvada users need to be tested for HIV initially and every three months, along with screenings for other infections and kidney function checks. Without proper medical supervision, there is a risk of misuse and inadequate protection.
Gilead is in discussions with Japanese authorities to improve access and insurance coverage for Truvada, and progress is being made. Japan has shown efficiency in approving critical medicines, as seen during the COVID-19 pandemic when Gilead’s remdesivir was approved in just three days.
Gilead at this moment is not only focused on HIV and hepatitis C, but also expanding into oncology with innovative treatments like CAR-T cell therapy, which strengthens a patient's immune system to fight cancer.
However, Japan’s strict approval processes can slow down drug availability. Phase 3 clinical trials often need to be conducted within the country, and Japan tends to approve medicines much later than other regions. For instance, Truvada was approved for prevention in Japan 12 years after the U.S. and nearly 20 years after its approval for treatment. inancial factors also play a role. The Japanese government adjusts drug prices annually, often reducing them, which can make long-term investment challenging for pharmaceutical companies.
Credit: AI
The Centre has tightened restrictions on certain cough and cold medicines for children below four years, citing potential health risks associated with a specific drug combination in children.
The Union Health Ministry has restricted the manufacture, sale and distribution of fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) containing chlorpheniramine maleate and phenylephrine hydrochloride for children under four.
Manufacturers have also been instructed to carry a clear warning stating that the medicine “shall not be used in children below four years of age.”
The decision follows recommendations from an expert committee and the Drugs Technical Advisory Board (DTAB), which reviewed the safety of the combination in young children.
Chlorpheniramine is an antihistamine, while phenylephrine is a decongestant. The combination is used to relieve symptoms like blocked or runny nose, sneezing and watery eyes caused by colds, flu and allergies.
However, young children can respond differently to medicines than adults, and dosing errors or adverse effects can result in more serious effects in this age group.
The Health Ministry’s expert committee concluded that the combination could pose potential health risks in children below four, particularly when safer alternatives are available.
The latest directive therefore requires manufacturers to clearly communicate the age restriction rather than putting the onus on parents.
A common cold is usually caused by a virus, meaning antibiotics do not treat it. In many children, symptoms improve with supportive care such as adequate fluids, rest and measures recommended by a paediatrician.
Combination cough and cold products can contain several active ingredients, increasing the possibility of incorrect dosing and side effects if parents give more than one medicine containing the same ingredient.
This is particularly important for young children because their medication doses are generally calculated according to age and/or body weight.
The government has been tightening oversight of paediatric medicines following serious concerns surrounding cough syrups in India.
In June, the Centre removed cough syrups from an exemption that had allowed certain products to be sold through retail outlets in smaller villages without the same pharmacy restrictions.
Parents should avoid giving children under four any medicine containing this combination unless specifically advised by a qualified healthcare professional.
The government has emphasised that safer alternatives are available, while the latest restriction is intended to reduce avoidable medication-related risks in young children.
Credit: iStock
‘Scromiting’ is back in the news as emergency department visits in the US involving cannabis hyperemesis syndrome (CHS) were 3.7 times as high, according to a CDC report.
CHS is associated with frequent cannabis use and is characterized by episodes of severe nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain. The term “scromiting” refers to a combination of screaming and vomiting that can occur during severe episodes.
The CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), which analyzed data from January 2023 through May 2026, found that the rate of emergency department visits involving CHS remained largely steady from January 2023 through September 2025.
CHS is likely under-recognized in both adolescents and adults. Clinicians may not routinely assess or document cannabis use, while CHS can also be misdiagnosed as other gastrointestinal conditions, including cyclic vomiting syndrome.
To improve clinical identification, a specific International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) discharge diagnosis code for CHS was introduced on October 1, 2025. The CDC report examined CHS-related emergency department visits before and after the code was introduced.
The change was immediate. From September 2025 to October 2025, CHS-involved emergency department visits jumped from 3.35 per 10,000 to 11.26 per 10,000. The rate rose further to 13.10 per 10,000 by May 2026.
From October 2025 through May 2026, CHS-involved emergency department visits were 3.7 times as high as the monthly average recorded before the new diagnostic code was introduced.
The CDC noted that the new code made the condition easier to identify and track, meaning the sharp increase may partly reflect greater recognition and documentation of CHS.
Also read: Sugar Rationing In First 1,000 Days Linked To Lower Depression, Cancer Risk In Adulthood
CHS is a syndrome associated with prolonged, frequent cannabis use. It is characterized by sudden episodes of severe nausea, repeated vomiting and abdominal pain.
Reports of suspected CHS increased sharply between 2016 and 2022, with the largest increase occurring during the COVID-19 pandemic. The CDC noted that the rise also coincided with widespread state-level cannabis legalization in the US, although cannabis remains illegal under federal law.
People with CHS often seek medical care because symptoms can be severe and debilitating. Outcomes can range from resolution of symptoms after stopping cannabis use to, in rare cases, death.
CHS was first identified in Australia in 2004, yet nearly two decades later, the condition remains poorly understood. It typically affects people who use marijuana daily or near daily for more than a year. Symptoms can include severe nausea, repeated vomiting and abdominal pain, along with a compulsive desire to take extremely hot showers or baths.
Many patients report that heat temporarily eases their symptoms, although the relief is often short-lived.
Read More: Scottish Toddler With Rare UV Disorder Gets UV-Safe Home: All About Inherited XP
CHS episodes can last for days, while recovery may take weeks or even months, depending on overall health, eating habits and whether the person stops using marijuana. Continuing to use cannabis can quickly trigger symptoms again.
A study from George Washington University found that nearly half of surveyed patients had been hospitalized at least once because of CHS. Many reported using marijuana more than five times a day before symptoms began. Starting cannabis at an early age was also linked to a higher likelihood of developing the condition.
Researchers emphasize that CHS is real, although many questions remain unanswered, including why hot showers provide temporary relief and how much cannabis use puts someone at risk.
Health experts say greater clinical awareness is needed. Better screening for cannabis use and recognition of symptom patterns could help reduce misdiagnosis and guide patients towards the only proven treatment: stopping marijuana use.
Credit: AI
The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has to stop the sale of all variants of ghee manufactured by Daman-based SDP Industries, after laboratory tests found signs of adulteration and violation of food safety standards.
The move came after an inspection conducted on May 19. FSSAI said multiple samples were found adulterated, with laboratory analysis detecting β-sitosterol, a plant sterol that should not be present in genuine ghee. The samples also contained abnormalities in fatty-acid composition.
The food regulator has prohibited the manufacture, storage and sale of the company’s ghee products from its authorised premises until further orders. The products include brands like SHRADDHA, SHREE SARAS and GOKUL.
As pure ghee is made from milk fat, the presence of β-sitosterol is a red flag as it is a plant sterol. FSSAI said its detection, together with the abnormal fatty-acid profile, indicated the presence of vegetable fats in ghee touted to be "pure".
The latest action is not based on a single sample. FSSAI said that surveillance samples collected in 2024 and January 2026 had also shown non-compliance with critical parameters, including β-sitosterol, fatty-acid profile, B.R. reading and R.M. value.
The health impact of adulteration depends on what has been added to or substituted for the ghee. Vegetable oils and other fats used in adulterated products may negatively alter the nutritional composition of the food. Some counterfeit products may also contain poor-quality, repeatedly heated or improperly processed oils and other non-food-grade substances.
Regular consumption of unhealthy fats can contribute to an overall diet high in saturated or trans fats, which may adversely affect cholesterol levels and cardiovascular health.
However, it is important not to assume that every adulterated ghee product will cause immediate poisoning or disease. The exact health risk depends on the adulterant, its concentration in the product and the amount consumed.
At the recent action in Hyderabad, authorities there seized around 36 tonnes of adulterated ghee, raw materials and chemical additives after inspecting 130 establishments. Officials said the suspected adulterated ghee involved ingredients including palm oil, vanaspati, skimmed milk powder and starch.
Also read: FSSAI Warns Influencers, Celebrities Of Legal Action Over Unverified Food Claims
There is no reliable kitchen test that can establish whether packaged ghee is genuine. Colour, smell, texture and whether ghee melts quickly are not enough to confirm purity because manufacturers can easily manipulate these characteristics. Instead, consumers should look for:
For suspected adulteration, laboratory testing is always the reliable method.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited