How Quitting Smoking Can Quickly Lower Risk Of A-Fib
Smokers who make the decision to quit will experience immediate health benefits, including a rapid reduction in their risk of atrial fibrillation (A-Fib), according to new research published in JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology. The study, conducted by Dr. Gregory Marcus, a cardiologist at the University of California, San Francisco, offers compelling evidence for smokers to quit, showing that it’s never too late to avoid the damaging effects of smoking on heart health.
Dr. Marcus, the senior author of the study, emphasized that A-Fib can be prevented even in individuals who have smoked for years. "The findings provide a compelling new reason to show current smokers that it’s not too late to quit, and that having smoked in the past doesn’t mean you’re ‘destined’ to develop A-Fib," Marcus explained. "Even for the current and longtime smoker, A-Fib can still be avoided."
"There’s strong evidence that smoking increases the risk of A-Fib," Marcus said. "But the benefits of quitting smoking have been less certain." With this in mind, his team sought to determine whether quitting could significantly lower a person’s risk of developing A-Fib, or if the risk would remain the same.
The research team analyzed data from over 146,700 current and former smokers, tracking their smoking habits and health over a 12-year period using data from the UK Biobank database. The results were promising: former smokers had a 13% lower risk of developing A-Fib compared to current smokers, while those who quit during the study saw an 18% reduction in their risk.
"This is likely a testament to the potency of reducing atrial fibrillation risk pretty shortly after quitting," Marcus said in a statement from the American College of Cardiology.
The findings highlight the importance of quitting smoking, not only for general health but specifically for reducing the risk of serious heart conditions like A-Fib.
Quitting smoking is one of the most effective ways to lower the risk of A-Fib and improve overall heart health. While it can be challenging, the benefits of quitting are clear and immediate. Here are some tips to help you quit smoking successfully:
1. Choose a specific date to quit smoking and stick to it. Prepare yourself mentally and physically for this change.
2. Reach out to family, friends, or a support group to help keep you accountable. Sharing your goals with others can provide encouragement.
3. Options like nicotine patches, gum, or lozenges can help ease withdrawal symptoms and reduce cravings.
4. Identify situations that make you want to smoke, such as stress or social gatherings, and find healthy ways to cope with them.
5. Regular exercise can help distract you from cravings and improve your mood during the quitting process.
6. Drinking water can help flush nicotine out of your system faster, reducing cravings.
7. Activities like yoga, meditation, or deep breathing exercises can help manage stress, a common trigger for smoking.
Quitting smoking offers immediate and significant benefits, particularly in reducing the risk of atrial fibrillation. The latest research provides smokers with more motivation to quit, showing that it's never too late to take control of their heart health.
Credit: AI
The Delhi High Court has refused to stay the Centre's ongoing Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programme for adolescent girls. The court said that there is no evidence of "immediate harm" from the vaccine.
It also said that the concerning questions around its rollout, safety and scientific backing remain open for judicial scrutiny.
A public interest litigation (PIL) was filed by gynaecologist Dr. Sujata Mittal and health entrepreneur Jitendra Chouksey, who challenged the nationwide rollout of Merck's Gardasil vaccine.
The plea states that the vaccination programme violates the constitutional rights of adolescent girls, including their rights to bodily autonomy, informed parental consent and personal liberty under Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India. It also raises concerns over long-term safety, efficacy, and post-vaccination monitoring.
A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice D.K. Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia rejected the plea for an interim stay.
The Bench observed, "There may not be long-term benefit (of HPV vaccination) but there is no immediate harm."
It added that the safety concerns related to the vaccine would be examined during the course of the proceedings.
Also read: Delhi High Court Questions Govt, ICMR Over HPV Vaccine Rollout, Issues Notice
Representing the Centre, Additional Solicitor General Chetan Sharma told Delhi HC that over 55 crore people worldwide have received HPV vaccines across nearly 160 countries.
He also informed the Bench that more than 55 lakh doses have been administered in India so far and only around 120 recipients reported minor side effects like nausea or headache.
"The government is taking appropriate and adequate measures while administering the vaccination," Sharma said, arguing that there was no scientific basis to drop the programme.
The High Court directed the Centre, the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), the Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO) and the National Immunization Technical Advisory Group (NITAG) to file detailed replies explaining the scientific and regulatory justification for introducing the vaccine.
Also read: India Vaccinates Over 5.2 Million Girls Against HPV To Fight Cervical Cancer
Apart from arguing that the programme violates the bodily autonomy of adolescent girls, the petition also alleged that the vaccinations are being administered through schools and public health systems without adequate informed parental consent.
It also states that frontline health workers have been assigned with enrolment targets. This directly creates pressure on the workers who compel these girls to receive the vaccine.
The plea also includes cases of reported adverse events after vaccine administration, including that of a 14-year-old girl from Tamil Nadu.
The case was first heard by the Delhi High Court on July 22, when the Bench described the issue as "extremely important" and sought the Centre's response.
During the latest hearing, the court declined to halt the programme but clarified that its order should not be considered as the final endorsement of the vaccine rollout.
The court will continue hearing arguments on the programme's scientific basis, efficacy, informed consent process, and adverse event reporting.
HPV is one of the most common sexually transmitted viruses and persistent infection with high-risk strains, particularly HPV-16 and HPV-18, and is responsible for nearly all cases of cervical cancer.
Vaccination before exposure to the virus is considered one of the most effective ways to prevent cervical cancer and many other HPV-related cancers.
India launched its HPV vaccination campaign in February 2026, offering a free single-dose quadrivalent HPV vaccine to eligible 14-year-old girls as part of its cervical cancer prevention strategy.
Credit: AI
COVID-19 antiviral drug remdesivir can help kidney transplant patients in more than one ways. Apart from keeping them free from COVID-19 infection, the drug could also help lower the risk of losing the transplanted kidney and reduce future heart-related complications.
The findings, published in JAMA Network Open, come from one of the largest studies to examine the long-term effects of remdesivir in adult kidney transplant recipients.
The subsection of patients that remains especially vulnerable to severe COVID-19 because of lifelong immune-suppressing medications.
Researchers from Johns Hopkins Medicine studied data from 432 adult kidney transplant recipients diagnosed with COVID-19 between March 2020 and January 2024.
Of these, 177 patients received remdesivir within a week of diagnosis for at least three consecutive days, while 255 did not receive the antiviral.
Patients treated with other COVID-19 therapies, such as monoclonal antibodies or alternative antivirals, were excluded.
After adjusting for factors including age, underlying illnesses, transplant timing, vaccination status and disease severity, researchers found that patients who received early remdesivir had a 47% lower risk of all-cause graft loss, over the following year.
Graft loss refers to transplant failure or death. They also had a 42% lower risk of cardiovascular events, including heart attack, stroke or cardiac-related death.
“These findings suggest that timely antiviral treatment may have benefits beyond the acute phase of COVID-19 in this population,” said Dr. Nitipong Permpalung, senior author of the study and associate director of the Johns Hopkins Transplant Research Center.
“We hope these findings will help reduce hesitations that physicians may have with considering providing remdesivir, when clinically appropriate, to adult kidney transplant recipients,” he added.
Patients who have undergone kidney transplants take immunosuppressive medicines to prevent organ rejection. While these drugs protect the transplanted kidney, they also weaken the body’s ability to fight infections, making COVID-19 more severe and increasing the risk of serious complications.
In the study, nearly 95% of participants had high blood pressure, 46% had diabetes, and one in five required supplemental oxygen when diagnosed with COVID-19.
More than half also temporarily stopped one of their immunosuppressive medications during infection.
Also read: Can Long COVID Be Prevented Before It Starts? Study Suggests Early Paxlovid May Help
Although the initial results are encouraging, researchers stressed that the study was observational rather than a randomised clinical trial.
That means it shows a strong association but cannot definitively prove that remdesivir alone caused the improved outcomes.
“I do think that the findings suggest the potential benefits of treating COVID-19 early may extend beyond the short-term benefits that the early clinical trials have shown,” Dr. Permpalung said in an interview with The American Journal of Managed Care.
He also said that that larger and more diverse studies are needed to understand why early treatment appears to protect transplanted kidneys and whether similar benefits extend to recipients of other transplanted organs such as the heart, lungs and liver.
The findings could help guide treatment for transplant specialists, particularly because kidney transplant recipients are often excluded from large clinical trials.
If confirmed in future studies, early antiviral treatment with remdesivir may become an important strategy not only for reducing severe COVID-19 but also for protecting transplanted organs and lowering long-term cardiovascular risks in such patients.
Credit: AI
Millions of bottles of over-the-counter cooling eye drops have been recalled across the United States after the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) raised concerns that the products may not be sterile. Sterility issues raises the risk of eye infections significantly.
The FDA has classified the recall as a Class II recall. An FDA Class II recall for a product refers to the public health action that may cause temporary health problems, where the chance of serious harm is remote.
This recall covers nearly 12 million bottles of eight Rohto cooling eye drop products. The agency said the recall was initiated on July 14, due to a “lack of assurance of sterility” in the affected products.
The eye drops were manufactured in Vietnam and distributed nationwide by The Mentholatum Company.
The recent FDA recall includes several popular Rohto products, including:
The food and drugs regulatory body has warned consumers to stop using the recalled eye drops immediately and check the FDA’s recall notice for affected lot numbers and expiration dates.
Also read: FDA Recalls Popular Thyroid Medication: What Levothyroxine Users Need to Know
Unlike tablets or capsules, eye drops are applied directly onto the eye. The process has limited natural protection against harmful microorganisms.
When sterility cannot always be guaranteed, bacteria or fungi may contaminate the solution easily.
Using contaminated eye drops significantly increases the risk of eye irritation, painful infections, damage to the corneas and, in extreme cases, vision loss.
Although the FDA has not disclosed any confirmed adverse effects linked to this recall, it said the products were withdrawn from the market as a precaution because ophthalmic products must strictly remain sterile throughout their shelf life.
The agency classified the recall as Class II, meaning exposure could cause temporary or reversible health effects, while serious harm is mostly unlikely.
Also read: US FDA Approves New Blood Test To Screen For Colorectal Cancer
Commenting on previous FDA recalls, Dr Gary Novack, clinical professor in the Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science at UC Davis, said, “For eye drops, that means strict sterility, ensuring products are free from microorganisms like bacteria.”
He also said that manufacturing facilities must maintain contamination-free conditions because medicines used in the eye bypass many of the body’s natural defence mechanisms.
Dr Jeffrey H. Ma, ophthalmologist at the UC Davis Eye Center, also advised patients not to use recalled products: “Drops that are not on the recall list should be safe to use. If you have any of the drops on the list, you should immediately throw them away.”
Health authorities recommend that people:
The latest recall comes after multiple eye drop recalls in recent years linked to manufacturing and sterility issues, highlighting growing scrutiny of ophthalmic products.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited