Having Trouble Quitting Smoking? Cigarettes With Low Nicotine Levels Could Be The Solution

Updated Jan 15, 2025 | 09:01 AM IST

SummaryNicotine is a chemical that is produced naturally from tobacco that makes the cigarette and also keeps people hooked. While it is believed that it makes people alert, and get the "hit" to keep them going, it exposes the users to harmful substances, carcinogens, and increases the risk of heart disease, lung cancer, and other illness.
Low-nicotine level of cigarettes

Cigarettes with ultralow nicotine levels are now being called the game-changer in the fight against smoking. If you are having trouble in quitting smoking, then, it is for you, that soon the Biden White House is expected to formally propose a plan that will order cigarette nicotine levels to be reduced, reports The Washington Post. For now though, it has been a failure, as these cigarettes, also known as VLN cigarettes that stands for very low nicotine are only available in 5,100 stores in 26 states. This is a very small fraction of the overall market for cigarettes. The company that makes it, 22nd Century, is struggling not because of the low supply, but also from the advocates who have long believed slashing nicotine levels altogether.

The Advent and ideation

Nicotine is a chemical that is produced naturally from tobacco that makes the cigarette and also keeps people hooked. While it is believed that it makes people alert, and get the "hit" to keep them going, it exposes the users to harmful substances, carcinogens, and increases the risk of heart disease, lung cancer, and other illness.

Ultralow-nicotine cigarettes, like the VLN brand, contain about 95% less nicotine than the regular cigarettes. The idea is quite simple: without the addictive grip of nicotine, smokers will find it easier to quit. Research too has shown some promise. For instance, the studies funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse revealed that very low nicotine cigarettes reduced addiction potential significantly without having users to increase their smoking frequency. However, the problem is, why would anyone choose for a low-nicotine that does not make them feel the same way, when the high-nicotine cigarette is right next to it, making them feel the same way, with the same alertness, sold at the same price.

“It’s very hard to imagine someone actively choosing to continue to use a low-nicotine product for the same price when a high-nicotine product is right next to it,” said Eric Donny, a Wake Forest University School of Medicine nicotine researcher.

No wonder, the experiment with low nicotine product by Philip Morris' Next cigarettes in the 1980s and Vector Tobacco's Quest brand in the early 2000s, flopped.

FDA's Role in the Push

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has supported the development of such products, even allowing VLN cigarettes to be marketed as lower-risk options. However, these products remain a niche market, available in only a fraction of U.S. stores.

Recently, the Biden administration has considered a bold step—mandating a dramatic reduction in nicotine levels for all cigarettes sold in the United States. Supporters believe this move could save millions of lives, while critics, including tobacco companies, warn of potential unintended consequences.

What Could Be The Challenges?

Resistance from Big Tobacco Companies: They could argue that slashing nicotine levels could backfire. Their claim is, smokers will turn to black markets or smoke more to satisfy their cravings, which may lead to greater exposure to harmful substances.

Consumer Reluctance: History is proof to the instances of smokers being hesitant to embrace the low-nicotine products.

Political Hurdle: It may face political roadblocks, as under the Trump administration, plans to cut nicotine were shelved.

Could Low-Nicotine Cigarettes Be The Solution?

Advocates believe that ultralow-nicotine cigarettes could be a game-changer, comparing them to decaf coffee or non-alcoholic beer—products that reduce harm while offering a similar experience.

Some experts warn that a black market for traditional cigarettes could undermine these efforts. They also stress the need for safer alternatives, such as vaping products, to support smokers transitioning away from traditional cigarettes.

End of Article

Delhi Again Wakes Up To Toxic Air After A Brief Respite, Children Are The Worst Hit

Updated Dec 1, 2025 | 10:56 AM IST

SummaryDelhi’s pollution surged again on December 1 as AQI levels crossed 300 at several stations after a brief dip. Children are the worst affected, with hospitals reporting a sharp rise in pollution-related illnesses. Despite emergency measures, toxic air persists, leaving parents anxious as research links prolonged exposure to long-term developmental and health risks.
Delhi Again Wakes Up To Toxic Air After A Brief Respite, Children Are The Worst Hit

Credits: iStock

Delhi pollution continues to worse, while yesterday their was a brief respite when the air quality index (AQI) levels were reported under the 'poor' category, and the AQI dropped to 269 at 7am on November 30. However, today, on December 1, the AQI at several stations crossed 300.

As per the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), Anand Vihar recorded an AQI of 325, ITO at 325, Rohini at 341, Bawana at 339, RK Puram at 336, Vivek Vihar at 321, Shadipur at 324, and Pusa at 322.

Children Are The Worst Victims Of Delhi Pollution

The toxic air in Delhi has spared no one, but the worst affected are children. On a recent weekday morning in Noida, a suburb near Delhi, BBC reported that at a crowded children’s clinic parents waited anxiously with little ones who were coughing, wheezing or struggling to breathe.

Most families said their children started falling sick in October, right when the capital’s air quality slipped into the hazardous range. This is a yearly pattern across northern India. A mix of slow winds, industrial fumes, vehicle emissions, dropping temperatures and the burning of crop residue creates a thick layer of pollution that settles over the region.

Since last month, Delhi’s Air Quality Index has mostly stayed between 300 and 400. These levels are over 20 times higher than what the World Health Organization (WHO) considers safe. Readings this high affect everyone, but young children and older adults are the most vulnerable.

Hospitals across the city have been overwhelmed with children suffering from pollution-related illnesses. Dr Shishir Bhatnagar, who heads the clinic in Noida, told BBC the number of cases has jumped sharply. He explained that young children are especially at risk because their immunity is still developing. He usually sees about 20 to 30 percent of cases linked to pollution, but that number doubles during the winter smog.

Although authorities often introduce emergency measures like halting construction or restricting vehicles, the situation has barely improved. Even an attempt at cloud seeding this year failed to bring relief, leaving millions worried about their families’ health.

For some parents, the fear is constant. BBC reports that Khushboo Bharti remembers rushing her one-year-old daughter to the hospital after a severe coughing fit left the baby vomiting and struggling to stay alert. The toddler later needed oxygen and was diagnosed with pneumonia. Other parents share similar worries, wondering whether the polluted air might cause lasting harm.

Research has repeatedly shown that prolonged exposure to polluted air can impair lung development, weaken immunity and even affect brain health. A recent study from the University of Cambridge linked certain pollutants to higher risks of dementia later in life.

While schools have postponed outdoor activities and moved younger classes online, these precautions mainly help families who have access to resources. For children living in crowded homes or near busy roads, the daily exposure is far worse. Doctors urge parents to keep children indoors when possible and use N95 masks, but many families find this unsustainable.

Parents say they feel helpless. They know children need space to play and fresh air to grow, yet every winter forces them to choose safety over normal childhood experiences.

How To Read AQI?

As per CPCB standards, here's how you can read AQI:

  • 0 to 50 Good
  • 51 to 100 Satisfactory
  • 101 to 200 Moderate
  • 201 to 300 Poor
  • 301 to 400 Very Poor
  • 401 to 500 Severe

End of Article

World Aids Day 2025: Theme, Origin And Significance

Updated Dec 1, 2025 | 08:33 AM IST

SummaryWorld AIDS Day 2025 highlights rising risks as progress against HIV stalls amid funding cuts and political barriers. With 40.8 million people affected and 630,000 deaths in 2024, the theme “Rethink, Rebuild, Rise” urges stronger systems, evidence-based action and community support to stay on track toward ending AIDS by 2030.
World Aids Day 2025: Theme, Origin And Significance

Credits: iStock

Aids Day, a day that focuses on raising awareness on a disease that effects 40.8 million lives. In 2024 alone, 630,000 people died from AIDS-related deaths. What really is AIDS? It stands for acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, which is an advanced stage of HIV, caused by the human immunodeficiency virus. It damages the immune system so that the body is less able to fight infections and diseases.

Thus, every year, on December 1, World AIDS Day is observed to increase awareness on the same, provide support to people living with it and remember those who have lost their lives to the illness.

World Aids Day 2025: Theme

This year, the theme for Aids Day is "Rethink, Rebuild, and Rise".

The International AIDS Society (IAS) wants to create a simple message through the theme that it is important for everyone to connect and work against HIV. This is an urge to everyone from local activists to scientists, to governments, and to the global organization.

The world’s fight against HIV is entering a critical phase. Hard-won progress is under threat as political tensions grow and funding becomes uncertain. This year’s theme, “Rethink. Rebuild. Rise.” is a powerful reminder that the global community must stay united, resilient and forward-thinking to meet the challenges ahead.

Rethink calls for stronger, long-term financial planning. It urges countries to invest more of their own resources instead of relying mainly on international support.

Rebuild highlights the need to strengthen health systems, protect scientific research and support civil society groups. It also emphasizes grounding every decision in solid evidence and pushing back against misinformation.

Rise encourages the world to move ahead with a fully funded, people-centered strategy that safeguards past achievements and brings us closer to ending AIDS as a public health threat by 2030.

Importance Of World Aids Day 2025

The United Nations notes that in 2025, funding crisis is threatening the progress made in the prevention of the illness. This is why this day is a reminder for more people to connect, initiate community services that are vital for the marginalized population who are often deprioritized while the rise in punitive law criminalizes same sex relationships, gender identity, and drug use that amplifies the crisis, and makes HIV-AIDS services inaccessible.

The global response to AIDS has been shaken in recent months, and much more work is needed to meet the Sustainable Development Goal of ending AIDS by 2030. The crisis is far from over, and in today’s challenging environment, a fresh, transformative strategy is essential to reduce risks and stay on track.

World Aids Day: Origin

The day was first observed in 1988 when the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations first launched it to spread awareness about HIV/AIDS, erase misconception, and build empathy for people living with AIDS. This day reminds people around the world that AIDS is not only a health problem but also a social and humanitarian issue for which everyone should work together.

Can You Prevent AIDS?

The prevention of AIDS starts from the restriction and complete stoppage of HIV. While there is no vaccine or permanent cure yet, there are ways to prevent AIDS:

  • Practice Safe Sex
  • Don't Share Needles
  • Prevent Mother-to-child Transmission
  • Ensure Safe Blood Transfusions

End of Article

Did the Covid Vaccine Kill 10 Children? An FDA Memo Raises Troubling Questions; Here's What We Know So Far

Updated Dec 1, 2025 | 06:29 AM IST

SummaryA leaked FDA memo claims at least ten children died from myocarditis linked to Covid vaccines, sparking controversy inside the agency. The findings are unpublished and lack key details, prompting criticism from experts who warn the claims may erode public trust. Officials debate tighter oversight as vaccine policies shift.
Did the Covid Vaccine Kill 10 Children? An FDA Memo Raises Troubling Questions; Here's What We Know So Far

Credits: iStock

Vaccine safety, a debate the Trump administration just cannot let go. Once again, the same debate is stirring up, and this time an internal Food and Drug Administration memo that The New York Times obtained has linked death of at least 10 children to the COVID vaccine. While the document has not been released publicly, it has already caused controversy and prompted talk of tighter regulations.

The New York Times however reports that the memo did not include essential such as the ages of the affected children, any underlying health conditions, or how the agency reached its conclusions. It also did not identify which manufacturers’ vaccines were involved. Since the findings have not been published in a peer-reviewed journal, many critics of Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. have raised concerns about the accuracy and timing of the claims. Kennedy has long questioned the safety of Covid shots, even as scientific consensus maintains that vaccines are safe and have saved countless lives.

So, What Does The Memo Say About Vaccination And Death Of Children?

Dr Vinay Prasad, who is the head of FDA's vaccine division wrote the memo based on the findings of a review of reports that suggested that the deaths were linked to myocarditis, which is a rare inflammation of the heart muscle.

But, what does the science say? Scientists have studied the connection between Covid vaccines and myocarditis for years, especially among teenage boys and young men. Most studies have shown that the condition is rare and usually resolves quickly.

Even so, Dr Prasad wrote to staff that the memo marked the first time the FDA would acknowledge that Covid vaccines may have played a role in the deaths of American children. He indicated that he would propose several new oversight measures. It is unclear whether the White House had been briefed on these plans or how closely officials would follow them. When The New York Times reached out to Department of Health and Human Services for a comment, the request was declined.

A Shift In Vaccine Policy

This memo comes at the time when the administration has already taken a more cautious stance on vaccines. Kennedy's team has already introduced new limits on who can or cannot receive COVID shots. The shot has now been restricted to people over 65 and younger individuals with medical vulnerabilities. Officials have also called for renewed studies on long-established vaccines that have been considered safe for decades.

Public health experts from previous administrations have warned that casting doubt on vaccines could have serious consequences. Covid has killed more than a million Americans, including about 2,100 children. Experts note that many more lives were saved because vaccines became widely available.

What Are The Experts Saying?

The memo appeared just before a significant upcoming meeting of the CDC’s vaccine committee, which now includes members known for supporting the medical freedom movement. Michael Osterholm, an infectious disease specialist, said the timing did not seem accidental and called the release “irresponsible.”

Other experts expressed concern that the memo lacked important context. Dr. Paul Offit of the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia pointed out that myocarditis from Covid infection itself has been far more severe than the rare cases linked to vaccines.

Dr. Prasad also criticized previous mandates for school and workplace vaccination, claiming they pressured people into receiving shots that might pose risks. His memo ended by addressing internal disagreements within the agency and outlining how staff should resign if they oppose the new direction.

End of Article