Cigarettes with ultralow nicotine levels are now being called the game-changer in the fight against smoking. If you are having trouble in quitting smoking, then, it is for you, that soon the Biden White House is expected to formally propose a plan that will order cigarette nicotine levels to be reduced, reports The Washington Post. For now though, it has been a failure, as these cigarettes, also known as VLN cigarettes that stands for very low nicotine are only available in 5,100 stores in 26 states. This is a very small fraction of the overall market for cigarettes. The company that makes it, 22nd Century, is struggling not because of the low supply, but also from the advocates who have long believed slashing nicotine levels altogether.
Nicotine is a chemical that is produced naturally from tobacco that makes the cigarette and also keeps people hooked. While it is believed that it makes people alert, and get the "hit" to keep them going, it exposes the users to harmful substances, carcinogens, and increases the risk of heart disease, lung cancer, and other illness.
Ultralow-nicotine cigarettes, like the VLN brand, contain about 95% less nicotine than the regular cigarettes. The idea is quite simple: without the addictive grip of nicotine, smokers will find it easier to quit. Research too has shown some promise. For instance, the studies funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse revealed that very low nicotine cigarettes reduced addiction potential significantly without having users to increase their smoking frequency. However, the problem is, why would anyone choose for a low-nicotine that does not make them feel the same way, when the high-nicotine cigarette is right next to it, making them feel the same way, with the same alertness, sold at the same price.
“It’s very hard to imagine someone actively choosing to continue to use a low-nicotine product for the same price when a high-nicotine product is right next to it,” said Eric Donny, a Wake Forest University School of Medicine nicotine researcher.
No wonder, the experiment with low nicotine product by Philip Morris' Next cigarettes in the 1980s and Vector Tobacco's Quest brand in the early 2000s, flopped.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has supported the development of such products, even allowing VLN cigarettes to be marketed as lower-risk options. However, these products remain a niche market, available in only a fraction of U.S. stores.
Recently, the Biden administration has considered a bold step—mandating a dramatic reduction in nicotine levels for all cigarettes sold in the United States. Supporters believe this move could save millions of lives, while critics, including tobacco companies, warn of potential unintended consequences.
Resistance from Big Tobacco Companies: They could argue that slashing nicotine levels could backfire. Their claim is, smokers will turn to black markets or smoke more to satisfy their cravings, which may lead to greater exposure to harmful substances.
Consumer Reluctance: History is proof to the instances of smokers being hesitant to embrace the low-nicotine products.
Political Hurdle: It may face political roadblocks, as under the Trump administration, plans to cut nicotine were shelved.
Advocates believe that ultralow-nicotine cigarettes could be a game-changer, comparing them to decaf coffee or non-alcoholic beer—products that reduce harm while offering a similar experience.
Some experts warn that a black market for traditional cigarettes could undermine these efforts. They also stress the need for safer alternatives, such as vaping products, to support smokers transitioning away from traditional cigarettes.
Credit: iStock
Amid reports of rare botulism cases in the UK, the country's Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has issued a safety warning for all botulinum toxin type A products, including Botox and other cosmetic injectables.
The regulator said cases of iatrogenic botulism—botulism caused by medical treatment—have been reported following both therapeutic and cosmetic use of botulinum toxin products when the toxin spreads beyond the intended injection site.
"Patients should seek immediate medical advice if they experience signs and symptoms," the MHRA said.
Botulinum toxin medicines are widely used for cosmetic procedures, such as reducing facial wrinkles, as well as for treating conditions including muscle spasms, excessive sweating (hyperhidrosis), and an overactive bladder.
While these medicines are considered safe when used correctly, the MHRA warned that, in very rare cases, the toxin can spread beyond the injection site and cause botulism—a serious and potentially life-threatening condition.
To improve awareness, the regulator has worked with manufacturers to update product information and patient leaflets to more clearly highlight the risk of iatrogenic botulism.
Also read: GLP-1 Weight-Loss Drugs Show Promise for 17 Million With Binge Eating Disorder, Suggests Study
The MHRA warned that symptoms may not appear immediately after treatment. They can develop within days or even up to four weeks after receiving a botulinum toxin injection.
Patients are advised to seek immediate medical attention if they experience:
According to the MHRA, the risk of serious side effects may be higher in:
Health officials say early recognition of symptoms is critical, as prompt treatment can help prevent serious complications.
"While botulism is a rare infection, it can be serious. There are effective treatments available, and we recommend seeking immediate medical advice if you have had a recent treatment and are experiencing symptoms such as difficulty swallowing," said Dr. Martin Bewley, Consultant in Health Protection at the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA).
Dr. Alison Cave, Chief Safety Officer at the MHRA, recommended that healthcare professionals and patients be aware of the symptoms of botulism and act quickly if they arise. Importantly, the expert "strongly urged the public to avoid unlicensed products and seek treatment only from appropriately qualified practitioners."
Botulism is a rare but serious illness caused by a toxin produced by the bacterium Clostridium botulinum. The toxin attacks the nervous system and can lead to paralysis, breathing difficulties, and, in severe cases, death if not treated promptly.
Because it can rapidly affect the muscles involved in breathing, botulism is considered a medical emergency.
Credit: AI generated image
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved a once-daily pill that can lower low-density lipoprotein (LDL), commonly known as "bad" cholesterol, a major risk factor for heart disease.
Developed by Merck, enlicitide, which will be marketed as Lipfendra, is the first FDA-approved oral PCSK9 inhibitor for reducing LDL cholesterol.
Lipfendra has been approved as an adjunct to diet and exercise to reduce LDL cholesterol in adults with primary hypercholesterolemia, including those with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH).
The approval is based on two Phase 3 clinical trials showing that Lipfendra can reduce LDL cholesterol to 50–60 mg/dL or even lower in many patients.
"Results from these Phase 3 trials showed treatment with Lipfendra resulted in reductions across other atherogenic lipoproteins associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk, including non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) and apolipoprotein B (ApoB)," Merck said.
High LDL cholesterol is a major risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), the leading cause of death globally.
"In two Phase 3 trials, LIPFENDRA led to impressive reductions in LDL-C. Now, for the first time, patients have an oral PCSK9 inhibitor for LDL lowering," said Dr. Ann Marie Navar, lead author of the clinical trial and associate professor at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.
Also read: Spinal Muscular Atrophy: England to Roll Out Nationwide Newborn Screening From 2027
Lipfendra is a 20 mg once-daily tablet that works by blocking PCSK9, a protein that regulates LDL receptors in the liver.
Normally, PCSK9 reduces the number of LDL receptors available to remove cholesterol from the bloodstream. By inhibiting this protein, Lipfendra allows more LDL receptors to remain active, enabling the liver to clear more LDL cholesterol from the blood.
Unlike statins, which lower cholesterol by blocking an enzyme the liver uses to produce cholesterol, Lipfendra targets the PCSK9 pathway. It is also the first oral medicine in this class, whereas existing PCSK9 inhibitors are administered as injections.
The FDA approval was supported by two Phase 3 studies, including a 24-week trial involving 2,912 participants, which demonstrated significant reductions in LDL cholesterol.
The studies found that:
The cholesterol-lowering effect was comparable to that seen with injectable PCSK9 inhibitors.
Merck is now conducting a cardiovascular outcomes trial to determine whether Lipfendra also lowers the risk of heart attacks, strokes and cardiovascular death, as injectable PCSK9 inhibitors have previously been shown to do.
Merck said Lipfendra will be available in the United States within the next few weeks. The company has set a list price of $315 for a 30-day supply, according to Merck spokeswoman Julie Cunningham.
Lipfendra is intended for adults with hypercholesterolemia, a condition characterized by elevated LDL cholesterol that can lead to plaque buildup in the arteries.
The drug may particularly benefit:
Credit: AI
Breast cancer diagnosed shortly after pregnancy may be more aggressive. According to new research, some young mothers may face poorer outcomes despite having similar types of breast cancer tumors as other women.
A UCLA-led study, published in npj Breast Cancer, found that women diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative breast cancer within the first three years after childbirth, especially during the first year, were more likely to have tumors with a higher risk of recurrence.
It therefore indicates that postpartum breast cancer is not simply breast cancer diagnosed after pregnancy but may be a biologically distinct disease.
Researchers analyzed young women with HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer using the widely used 21-gene Oncotype DX Recurrence Score, a genomic test that helps predict the likelihood of cancer recurrence and whether chemotherapy may be beneficial.
They discovered that tumors diagnosed during the first three years after childbirth had significantly higher recurrence rates than tumors in women who had never given birth.
The highest scores were observed among women diagnosed within the first year after delivery.
"Our findings suggest that the first three years after childbirth represent a distinct biological window during which hormone receptor-positive breast cancers may behave more aggressively," the researchers observed.
The study also provides one of the first genomic definitions of this high-risk postpartum period rather than relying solely on clinical observations.
Also read: You Know What? Wearing Black Underwears Do Not Cause Breast Cancer - Myths Busted By Expert
Researchers believe that the answer to that question lies in what happens to the breast after breastfeeding comes to an end.
After pregnancy and lactation, the breast undergoes a natural process called mammary gland involution, during which the milk-producing tissue shrinks, and the breast returns to its pre-pregnancy state.
While this change is normal, it creates a temporary environment that features inflammation, weakened immune system, and extensive tissue restructuring.
According to a recent review published in Breast Cancer Research, these biological changes may unintentionally create conditions that help dormant cancer cells survive, grow, and spread. Researchers describe this postpartum remodeling as a "tumor-promoting microenvironment."
These processes may partly explain why postpartum breast cancers are often diagnosed at more advanced stages and have poorer outcomes than breast cancers in women of similar age who have not recently given birth.
The findings hold importance as breast cancer rates among younger women continue to increase worldwide just when women are getting pregnant later in their lives. Previous studies have indicated that breast cancer detected after pregnancy behaves differently.
"The medical community has long recognized that breast cancers diagnosed after pregnancy can behave differently," UCLA researchers said. "With breast cancer rates among younger women increasing, scientists have been studying whether delayed timing of first pregnancy may help explain some of that trend."
Because pregnancy and breastfeeding naturally change breast tissue, warning signs like lumps or breast firmness can sometimes be mistaken for normal postpartum changes. This may delay diagnosis and allow cancers to progress before they are detected.
© 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited