Cigarettes with ultralow nicotine levels are now being called the game-changer in the fight against smoking. If you are having trouble in quitting smoking, then, it is for you, that soon the Biden White House is expected to formally propose a plan that will order cigarette nicotine levels to be reduced, reports The Washington Post. For now though, it has been a failure, as these cigarettes, also known as VLN cigarettes that stands for very low nicotine are only available in 5,100 stores in 26 states. This is a very small fraction of the overall market for cigarettes. The company that makes it, 22nd Century, is struggling not because of the low supply, but also from the advocates who have long believed slashing nicotine levels altogether.

The Advent and ideation

Nicotine is a chemical that is produced naturally from tobacco that makes the cigarette and also keeps people hooked. While it is believed that it makes people alert, and get the "hit" to keep them going, it exposes the users to harmful substances, carcinogens, and increases the risk of heart disease, lung cancer, and other illness.

Ultralow-nicotine cigarettes, like the VLN brand, contain about 95% less nicotine than the regular cigarettes. The idea is quite simple: without the addictive grip of nicotine, smokers will find it easier to quit. Research too has shown some promise. For instance, the studies funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse revealed that very low nicotine cigarettes reduced addiction potential significantly without having users to increase their smoking frequency. However, the problem is, why would anyone choose for a low-nicotine that does not make them feel the same way, when the high-nicotine cigarette is right next to it, making them feel the same way, with the same alertness, sold at the same price.

“It’s very hard to imagine someone actively choosing to continue to use a low-nicotine product for the same price when a high-nicotine product is right next to it,” said Eric Donny, a Wake Forest University School of Medicine nicotine researcher.

No wonder, the experiment with low nicotine product by Philip Morris' Next cigarettes in the 1980s and Vector Tobacco's Quest brand in the early 2000s, flopped.

FDA's Role in the Push

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has supported the development of such products, even allowing VLN cigarettes to be marketed as lower-risk options. However, these products remain a niche market, available in only a fraction of U.S. stores.

Recently, the Biden administration has considered a bold step—mandating a dramatic reduction in nicotine levels for all cigarettes sold in the United States. Supporters believe this move could save millions of lives, while critics, including tobacco companies, warn of potential unintended consequences.

What Could Be The Challenges?

Resistance from Big Tobacco Companies: They could argue that slashing nicotine levels could backfire. Their claim is, smokers will turn to black markets or smoke more to satisfy their cravings, which may lead to greater exposure to harmful substances.

Consumer Reluctance: History is proof to the instances of smokers being hesitant to embrace the low-nicotine products.

Political Hurdle: It may face political roadblocks, as under the Trump administration, plans to cut nicotine were shelved.

Could Low-Nicotine Cigarettes Be The Solution?

Advocates believe that ultralow-nicotine cigarettes could be a game-changer, comparing them to decaf coffee or non-alcoholic beer—products that reduce harm while offering a similar experience.

Some experts warn that a black market for traditional cigarettes could undermine these efforts. They also stress the need for safer alternatives, such as vaping products, to support smokers transitioning away from traditional cigarettes.

The US Food and Drug Administration has recalled over three million eye drops in the country over safety concerns.

The 3,111,072 products were manufactured by California-based K C Pharmaceuticals and were sold under names such as “Dry Eye Relief Eye Drops,” “Sterile Eye Drops,” and “Artificial Tears Sterile Lubricant Eye Drops,” according to the FDA notice.

K C Pharmaceuticals made the voluntary recall of the eye drops in early March.

The eight types of eye drop products were sold at major retailers, including CVS, Walgreens, and Rite Aid. They have expiration dates ranging from April to October.

Eye Drops: Why Are These Recalled? What Did The US FDA Say

The FDA, in its Enforcement Reports, stated that the products recalled “lack of assurance of sterility.”

While so far, there are no reports of injuries associated with the eye drops, the FDA notice classified the action as a “Class II recall.”

Class II recalls apply to products that can cause “temporary or medically reversible” health problems.

As per the FDA, "the probability of a serious health issue is remote," over these products, and that is why the recall is categorized as a Class II, USA TODAY reported

"Patients and consumers can continue using the medicine unless otherwise directed by the recalling company or FDA," the regulator said in a statement to the publication.

Also read: Can 'Eye Strain' Lead To Brain Cancer? Experts Explain

Which Eye Drops Have Been Recalled?

NBC News reported that the recalled products include:

1. Sterile Eye Drops AC (tetrahydrozoline HCl 0.05%, zinc sulfate 0.25%), 0.5 fl oz (15 mL) bottles
2. EYE DROPS Advanced Relief, (dextran 70 0.1%, polyethylene glycol 400 1%, and tetrahydrozoline HCl 0.05%), 0.5 fl oz (15 mL) bottles
3. Dry Eye Relief Eye Drops (glycerin 0.2%, hypromellose 0.2%, and polyethylene glycol 400 1%) 0.5 fl oz (15 mL) bottles
4. Ultra Lubricating Eye Drops (polyethylene 400 0.4%, propylene glycol 0.3%), Sterile, 0.5 fl oz (15mL) bottles
5. Sterile Eye Drops Original Formula (tetrahydrozoline HCl 0.05%), 0.5 fl oz (15mL) bottles.
6. Sterile Eye Drops Redness Lubricant (glycerin 0.25% and naphazoline HCl 0.012%), 0.5 fl oz (15 mL) bottles
7. Sterile Eye Drops Soothing Tears (polyethylene glycol 400 0.4% and propylene glycol 0.3%), 0.5 OZ 0.5 fl oz (15 mL) bottles.
8. Artificial Tears Sterile Lubricant Eye Drops (polyvinyl alcohol 0.5%, povidone 0.6%), 0.5 fl oz (15 mL) bottles.

Here’s What You Can Do Instead?

Also read: Struggling With Dry Eyes? Study Reveals Surprising Treatment- Tips To Prevent This Disease

The key to ensuring that your eyes are protected from environmental factors like the sun, dust, and dirt, especially for those who work outdoors or spend long hours on screen, is investing in good sunglasses with ultraviolet protection.

"For those who are using computers a lot, you need to blink your eyes constantly, take breaks in between, and drink a lot of water. Dehydration is also a contributing factor to dry eye," Dr Anita Sethi, who is Principal Director and HOD Ophthalmology, Max Multi Specialty Centre at Panchsheel Park.

She also recommends using zero-number protective glasses and computer glasses that can decrease strain and dry eye.

While advising people to stay away from natural remedies like turmeric or ginger put inside the eye, Dr Sethi urged people to consume more “foods rich in vitamin E, antioxidants” to maintain eye health.

“Colored vegetables and fruits, and even maintaining thyroid and vitamin D levels, because these also contribute to dry eye,” the ophthalmologist said.

Smokers turn to vaping thinking that it is cooler and more convenient. Little do they realise that this seemingly convenient act could cause long-term damage, most of it irreversible. Scientists now fear that vaping could be linked to not one, but two forms of cancer. E-cigarettes can trigger lung and mouth cancer, and this is a consequence of the DNA-damaging chemicals found in vapes. Researchers at the University of New South Wales in Sydney came to this conclusion after reviewing studies on mice that developed lung tumours after being exposed to aerosol. Reports also suggest that heavy smokers are more prone to mouth cancer.

Why are vaping pens linked to cancer?

Vapour from pens has a relatively better fragrance compared to conventional cigarettes, as these pens are flavoured. However, researchers say that these pens contain chemicals that can cause cancer, damage DNA, and lead to tissue inflammation. Researchers also say that e-cigarettes contain nicotine, which is likely to trigger lung and mouth cancer. However, the extent of this effect in humans is still unknown.

Read more: Parents Who Smoke May Be Passing Severe Lung Disease Risk To Their Children

Lead researchers of the study said that they would only be able to determine the precise risk once long-term studies are available. Contrary to popular belief, while many believe that vaping is far safer than smoking, the study’s findings act as a warning for all those who use a vape but have not smoked a cigarette in their life. Experts at the University of Sydney noted that vaping is a safer alternative to smoking for smokers. However, the research has drawn criticism for being “problematic” and “misleading”.

Experts at University College London said that no one would argue that e-cigarettes are completely risk-free. Rather, they said, vapes should be used as a harm-reduction tool to help smokers quit the habit, thereby reducing their risk of chronic and acute health problems, such as heart disease. The review, however, does not give a free pass to use e-cigarettes. It issues a warning against the use of vapes, citing risks of lung and oral cancer. At a time when vape use has increased suddenly, overtaking the popularity of smoking, research is necessary to discourage people, especially youngsters, from adopting the habit in the first place.

Cancer, a rare occurrence? Unfortunately, not anymore. According to recent findings from an analysis published in The Lancet, cancer is one of the top 10 causes of death among Indian children. This is an alarming statistic, signalling an under-recognised public health problem. Data in the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023 noted that even as infectious diseases decline, noncommunicable diseases like cancer are emerging as a serious threat to child survival and well-being. In India, this epidemiological shift is particularly concerning in the context of childhood cancers. Despite being rare, they are highly treatable when detected in the early stages—yet most cases are diagnosed late.

As per the Indian Council of Medical Research’s National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research (ICMR-NCDIR), childhood cancers accounted for 3–5 per cent of cancer cases reported in India in 2022. The country sees an estimated 50,000 to 60,000 cases every year among children aged 0–14 years. This makes it one of the highest burdens globally. In 2023, 377,000 cases of childhood cancer were reported globally, along with 144,000 deaths, according to The Lancet research paper.

Read more: 3 Children In Every 4 Minutes Are Diagnosed With Cancer, That's What Makes Awareness Important Says Doctor

Hidden cancer burden in India

When it comes to childhood cancers in India, leukaemia, or blood cancers, are the most common, followed by lymphomas and tumours of the central nervous system. Collectively, these categories comprise most cases of childhood cancers in the country. The statistics vary across regions, with Delhi reporting the highest number of cases due to better diagnostic facilities. However, experts believe that the actual burden is likely to be much higher. Incomplete cancer registration and limited access to proper diagnostic facilities in underserved and rural areas are to blame for delayed diagnosis.

Why is childhood cancer detected late in India?

Experts say that cancer deaths in India can largely be attributed to delayed diagnosis. Early symptoms of cancer in children include fatigue, fever, unexplained weight loss, and swelling in certain body parts. These symptoms are often overlooked, leading to delays at multiple levels. According to the ICMR 2022 factsheet, a significant proportion of children reach hospitals only at advanced stages of the disease. By then, treatment becomes more complex, more expensive, and less likely to succeed.

Access to cancer care for children

Access to cancer care for children is uneven in India. Paediatric oncology services are largely limited to hospitals in tier-one cities, forcing families from rural areas and smaller towns to travel in order to access proper treatment. This imbalance results in delayed care, especially for economically vulnerable families. Financial limitations are another barrier in the process—even if treatment costs are subsidised, expenses such as travel, accommodation, and loss of income can be overwhelming.

Read more: 41 million children aged 5-19 living with high BMI in India: Study

Irregular survival patterns

Globally, survival rates for childhood cancers exceed 80 per cent in high-income countries. In India, outcomes are uneven. The ICMR 2022 factsheet noted that survival depends on the stage of diagnosis, type of cancer, and where the child is treated. Hospitals in India are reporting improving survival rates for certain forms of cancer, such as acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. The ICMR factsheet also highlights the need for a dedicated approach to paediatric cancer care, including better infrastructure, trained doctors, and stronger referral systems.