Cigarettes with ultralow nicotine levels are now being called the game-changer in the fight against smoking. If you are having trouble in quitting smoking, then, it is for you, that soon the Biden White House is expected to formally propose a plan that will order cigarette nicotine levels to be reduced, reports The Washington Post. For now though, it has been a failure, as these cigarettes, also known as VLN cigarettes that stands for very low nicotine are only available in 5,100 stores in 26 states. This is a very small fraction of the overall market for cigarettes. The company that makes it, 22nd Century, is struggling not because of the low supply, but also from the advocates who have long believed slashing nicotine levels altogether.

The Advent and ideation

Nicotine is a chemical that is produced naturally from tobacco that makes the cigarette and also keeps people hooked. While it is believed that it makes people alert, and get the "hit" to keep them going, it exposes the users to harmful substances, carcinogens, and increases the risk of heart disease, lung cancer, and other illness.

Ultralow-nicotine cigarettes, like the VLN brand, contain about 95% less nicotine than the regular cigarettes. The idea is quite simple: without the addictive grip of nicotine, smokers will find it easier to quit. Research too has shown some promise. For instance, the studies funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse revealed that very low nicotine cigarettes reduced addiction potential significantly without having users to increase their smoking frequency. However, the problem is, why would anyone choose for a low-nicotine that does not make them feel the same way, when the high-nicotine cigarette is right next to it, making them feel the same way, with the same alertness, sold at the same price.

“It’s very hard to imagine someone actively choosing to continue to use a low-nicotine product for the same price when a high-nicotine product is right next to it,” said Eric Donny, a Wake Forest University School of Medicine nicotine researcher.

No wonder, the experiment with low nicotine product by Philip Morris' Next cigarettes in the 1980s and Vector Tobacco's Quest brand in the early 2000s, flopped.

FDA's Role in the Push

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has supported the development of such products, even allowing VLN cigarettes to be marketed as lower-risk options. However, these products remain a niche market, available in only a fraction of U.S. stores.

Recently, the Biden administration has considered a bold step—mandating a dramatic reduction in nicotine levels for all cigarettes sold in the United States. Supporters believe this move could save millions of lives, while critics, including tobacco companies, warn of potential unintended consequences.

What Could Be The Challenges?

Resistance from Big Tobacco Companies: They could argue that slashing nicotine levels could backfire. Their claim is, smokers will turn to black markets or smoke more to satisfy their cravings, which may lead to greater exposure to harmful substances.

Consumer Reluctance: History is proof to the instances of smokers being hesitant to embrace the low-nicotine products.

Political Hurdle: It may face political roadblocks, as under the Trump administration, plans to cut nicotine were shelved.

Could Low-Nicotine Cigarettes Be The Solution?

Advocates believe that ultralow-nicotine cigarettes could be a game-changer, comparing them to decaf coffee or non-alcoholic beer—products that reduce harm while offering a similar experience.

Some experts warn that a black market for traditional cigarettes could undermine these efforts. They also stress the need for safer alternatives, such as vaping products, to support smokers transitioning away from traditional cigarettes.

The ongoing Ebola virus outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo, which has also spread to Uganda, has been identified as caused by the rare Bundibugyo strain.

As per the US CDC, as of May 17, there are reports of 10 confirmed cases and 336 suspected cases, including 88 deaths, in DRC.

Uganda has reported 2 confirmed cases, including 1 death, among people who travelled from DRC. No further spread has been reported. These numbers are subject to change as the outbreak evolves.

Speaking exclusively to HealthandMe, Professor Emma Thomson, Director of the Centre for Virus Research (Virology) in the School of Infection and Immunity at the University of Glasgow, shared why the virus outbreak, which has been declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) by the World Health Organization (WHO), is of concern.

While the Bundibugyo virus, a member of the species Orthoebolavirus bundibugyoense, is closely related to the Ebola virus (species Orthoebolavirus zairense), it is still different and currently has no treatment or vaccine.

Professor Emma told HealthandMe that “there are several reasons for concern".

Ebola Outbreak: Likely Went Undetected For Some Time

The expert noted that "the reports that initial GeneXpert Ebola testing was negative suggest that the outbreak may have gone undetected for some time, with early diagnostic blind spots delaying recognition".

There have also been reports of infections in healthcare workers, which is "a serious warning sign in any filovirus outbreak, because they indicate unrecognized transmission in healthcare settings and gaps in infection prevention and control", the Professor said.

Notably, Ebola cases have been identified in Kinshasa and Kampala. These are "hundreds of kilometres from Ituri province, and it shows that the virus has already moved through human mobility networks before full containment was in place," Professor Emma said.

The Bundibugyo virus: Previous Outbreaks

The Bundibugyo virus has previously caused two recognized outbreaks. The first was in Bundibugyo District, Uganda, in 2007–2008, with 131 reported cases and 42 deaths, and a case fatality proportion of 34–40 per cent.

The second was in Isiro, Democratic Republic of the Congo, in 2012, with 38 laboratory-confirmed cases and 13 deaths, although wider outbreak reports, including probable and suspected cases, gave higher totals.

These figures are lower than the case fatality rates seen in many outbreaks caused by the Ebola virus, but they are still extremely serious. "Bundibugyo virus disease is not a mild infection," the expert said.

Ebola virus: Vaccine And Therapeutics

Currently, there is a licensed vaccine that targets the Ebola virus from the species Orthoebolavirus zairense (rVSV-ZEBOV).

"Experimental non-human primate work suggests that rVSV-ZEBOV may provide partial heterologous protection against Bundibugyo virus, but this cannot be assumed to translate into reliable protection in people during an outbreak," Professor Emma noted.

"Adenovirus- and MVA-vectored vaccine platforms may offer broader possibilities, particularly where multivalent constructs are used, but recent immunological data suggest that some licensed or advanced platforms still induce responses that are predominantly directed against the Ebola virus rather than broadly cross-reactive across all ebolaviruses," she added.

In other words, "we do not currently have a proven, licensed, Bundibugyo-virus-specific vaccine available for outbreak control," the Professor said, stressing the need for "urgent research" on vaccines.

Similarly, she stressed the need to boost "therapeutics" against the Ebola virus.

"Approved monoclonal antibody treatments such as Inmazeb and Ebanga were developed for the disease caused by the Ebola virus, not Bundibugyo virus, and their efficacy against other ebolaviruses has not been established," Professor Emma told HealthandMe.

"There are promising experimental broad-spectrum antibodies, but these are not yet a substitute for rapid detection, high-quality supportive care, infection prevention and control, and contact tracing," she added.

Bundibugyo-virus OutbreaK: What Should Be Prioritized?

Professor Emma further called for ramping up practical and scientifical priorities. These include:

• the Bundibugyo-virus-capable diagnostics,
• rapid genomic sequencing,
• strong infection prevention in healthcare settings,
• safe clinical pathways,
• contact tracing,
• community engagement,
• treatment centres able to deliver high-quality supportive care.

The expert also stressed the importance of genomic sequencing as it can:

• confirm the virus species,
• Identify whether cases are linked,
• reconstruct transmission chains,
• Detect whether the outbreak reflects sustained human-to-human transmission or multiple introductions.

“This outbreak also highlights a persistent weakness in epidemic preparedness. We tend to build tools around the best-known outbreak pathogens, but rarer viruses such as Bundibugyo virus can still cause severe disease and international spread," Professor Emma said.

The expert also highlighted the essential need for

• sustained investment in high-containment laboratories,
• diagnostic development,
• genomic surveillance,
• vaccine platforms,
• therapeutics and international research partnerships.

There is no case of Ebola reported in India, said the government today, while stepping up surveillance in the country at key places such as airports and seaports.

The government has also "initiated precautionary public health measures", following the declaration of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) by the World Health Organization (WHO).

A senior official in the Ministry of Health clarified that "there is no reported case of Ebola in India and the current risk to the country remains minimal".

However, India is closely monitoring the outbreak that has so far 336 suspected cases, including 88 deaths, in DR Congo; and

2 confirmed cases, and 1 death in Uganda.

"Senior officials of the Ministry, including officials from the National Centre for Disease Control (NCDC), Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP), ICMR, and other concerned divisions, have reviewed the evolving situation and initiated precautionary public health measures," said the Ministry.

Key preparedness measures include:

• Review of SOPs for screening, surveillance, quarantine , and case management;
• Strengthening laboratory preparedness, with NIV Pune designated for testing and additional laboratories being onboarded in phases;
• Enhanced coordination with relevant Ministries and agencies for monitoring international travel from affected regions;
• Identification and readiness of isolation and quarantine facilities at major airports and ports.

"India’s public health system remains vigilant and fully prepared to respond to any emerging situation,” it said, adding that “citizens are advised to follow official updates issued by the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare and WHO”.

The official asserted that India continues to maintain close coordination with international health authorities and will take all necessary measures to safeguard public health.

The Ebola Outbreak

On May 17, the WHO declared the Ebola outbreak in Central Africa a "public health emergency of international concern."

According to the Africa CDC, the outbreak is caused by a rare strain of the Bundibugyo virus, for which there is no vaccine available currently.

Bundibugyo virus disease is a rare and deadly illness that has caused outbreaks in several African countries in the past. It is different from other known ebolaviruses such as the Zaire ebolavirus and the Sudan ebolavirus.

How Does Ebola Bundibugyo Spread?

The Bundibugyo virus spreads through contact with the blood or bodily fluids of a person infected with or who has died from the rare Ebola strain.

It can also spread through contact with contaminated objects such as clothing, bedding, needles, and medical equipment, or through contact with infected animals such as bats and nonhuman primates.

Historically, Bundibugyo virus outbreaks have recorded fatality rates ranging from 25 per cent to 50 per cent.

Symptoms To Watch For

Symptoms of Bundibugyo virus disease are similar to other forms of Ebola and include:

• Fever
• Headache
• Muscle pain
• Weakness
• Diarrhea
• Vomiting
• Stomach pain
• Unexplained bleeding or bruising, usually in later stages of illness

Prof Trudie Lang from the University of Oxford also described dealing with Bundibugyo as “one of the most significant concerns” in the current outbreak, the BBC reported.

Symptoms are believed to appear between two and 21 days after infection.

With no approved drugs specifically targeting the Bundibugyo virus, treatment currently depends on supportive care, including managing pain, treating secondary infections, maintaining fluids, and ensuring adequate nutrition. Early medical care improves survival chances.

The Democratic Republic of Congo is currently facing its 17th outbreak of the Ebola virus. While scientists have identified the outbreak as being caused by the rare Bundibugyo strain, a major concern is that there is currently no approved treatment or vaccine specifically targeting it.

Although highly effective vaccines such as ERVEBO exist, they are designed specifically for the Zaire strain of Ebola and do not protect against other strains like Sudan or Bundibugyo.

Now, a team of scientists at the Université de Montréal (UdeM) in Canada has identified a new family of natural molecules with strong antiviral activity, particularly against the Ebola virus.

Previously, in 2016 and again in 2020, researchers at the university’s Montreal Clinical Research Institute (IRCM) demonstrated that a plant extract rich in isoquercitrin — a flavonoid found in many plants — showed strong antiviral activity in laboratory studies.

However, the exact source of the effect remained unclear.

What Were The Plant Molecules?

Researchers, including scientists from the University of Chicago, used advanced analytical methods and a rigorous bioassay-guided approach to determine that the antiviral activity did not originate from isoquercitrin itself, but rather from two previously unknown triterpenoid compounds.

Though present at only 0.4 per cent of the analyzed extract, these newly identified molecules — named dicitriosides — proved to be up to 25 times more active than the original extract against the Ebola virus under experimental conditions.

The compounds were also found to be effective against SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic. Researchers noted that the molecules demonstrated antiviral efficacy at pharmacologically achievable concentrations.

“This discovery illustrates how compounds present in vanishingly small amounts in nature can have major therapeutic potential,” said Majambu Mbikay from the IRCM. “It also underscores the importance of carefully examining the true composition of natural products used in biomedical research.”

The scientists noted in the study that even though the findings are "still at the preclinical stage, it opens promising avenues for the discovery of new broad-spectrum antivirals derived from natural products”.

“No one knows when the next pandemic will occur, but one thing is certain: we must be prepared,” said Michel Chrétien, medical professor at UdeM. “These results demonstrate the importance of long-term fundamental research and international collaboration in anticipating the public-health challenges of the future.”

The Ebola Outbreak

On May 17, the World Health Organization declared it a "public health emergency of international concern." The outbreak has also spread to Uganda.

According to the Africa CDC, the outbreak is caused by a rare strain of the Bundibugyo virus, for which there is no vaccine available currently.

Bundibugyo virus disease is a rare and deadly illness that has caused outbreaks in several African countries in the past. It is different from other known ebolaviruses such as the Zaire ebolavirus and the Sudan ebolavirus.

As per the US CDC, as of May 17, there are reports of 10 confirmed cases and 336 suspected cases, including 88 deaths, in DRC.

Uganda has reported 2 confirmed cases, including 1 death, among people who travelled from DRC. No further spread has been reported. These numbers are likely to increase as the outbreak evolves.