The Union Health Ministry implemented a ban on 156 "irrational" FDC medicines, effective immediately. These medicines, including widely used antibiotics, painkillers, and multivitamins, were commonly used to treat fever, cough, and infections. The ban was imposed due to the associated health risks and lack of therapeutic justification for the ingredients in these FDCs.

What are FDC medicines?

FDCs or fixed-dosed combinations, also known as "cocktail drugs," are medications that combine multiple drugs in a single pill. They are designed to treat multiple symptoms or conditions simultaneously. While they offer convenience, they can pose significant risks. These risks include the possibility of overdose, adverse interactions between the drugs, and the development of antibiotic resistance. Additionally, many FDC medicines lack sufficient scientific evidence to support their safety and efficacy.

Expert opinions on FDC medicines

Experts have raised concerns about the use of FDC medicines. They believe that many of these combinations lack sufficient scientific evidence to support their safety and effectiveness. Additionally, the combination of multiple drugs in a single pill can increase the risk of adverse side effects and interactions with other medications.

Experts have also found that FDC medicines may not be as effective as individual drugs in treating certain conditions. It is important to note that safer and more effective alternatives are available for most of the medical conditions that FDC medicines were used to treat. One particular concern is the inclusion of antibiotics in some FDCs. Overuse of antibiotics can contribute to the development of antibiotic resistance, a major public health threat.

The risks of FDC medicines

The use of FDC medicines can lead to adverse effects, including serious ones. Additionally, safer alternatives, tested in clinical trials, are available to treat the same medical conditions. Experts recommend prescribing drugs individually based on a patient's clinical symptoms rather than combining them in FDCs.

The ban on irrational FDC medicines by the Union Health Ministry can be seen as a positive step towards promoting rational drug use and protecting public health. The goal is to eliminate unnecessary and potentially harmful drug combinations. This is a step forward in reducing the risks associated with medication and ensure safer and more effective treatment options for patients.

On Wednesday, Pennsylvania health officials reported its fifth measles-related death of 2026, as the state’s outbreak continues to expand in what can be described as the country’s most serious measles resurgence in decades.

The latest death involved Lancaster County resident who had tested positive for measles, according to the Pennsylvania Department of Health. The state now has 943 confirmed measles cases across 39 counties, with 40 new infections reported since September 28. At least 176 people have been hospitalised.

The latest death is the third reported in Lancaster County, which has remained one of the hardest-hit areas in Pennsylvania. This has raised the measles death toll in the state to 5, all of whom were unvaccinated.

Health Officials Are Concerned

Measles is one of the most contagious infectious diseases. It spreads when an infected person coughs or sneezes, with the virus capable of remaining in the air for up to two hours after the person has left an area.

The outbreak is particularly concerning because measles can cause serious complications, including pneumonia, dehydration, brain swelling and, in rare cases, death.

Pennsylvania’s news also comes as measles cases continue to increase across the country. The US has recorded 3,659 confirmed measles cases this year, according to CDC data cited by Reuters, making 2026 the country's worst measles outbreak in decades.

Also read: Pennsylvania Measles Cases Cross 900 As US Total Climbs To 3,659

People Who Died Were Unvaccinated

According to the Pennsylvania health officials, all the five people who died due to measles were unvaccinated. Of the state's 943 confirmed cases, only four people were vaccinated.

Three of the deaths were among unvaccinated adults. The other two deaths were among infants who were too young to have received the measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine.

The numbers highlight the role of vaccination in preventing severe disease and controlling transmission. The MMR vaccine, which protects against measles, mumps and rubella, is highly effective. Two doses provide about 97% protection against measles.

According to Pennsylvania’s health department, less than 1% of measles cases occurred in people who were fully vaccinated against the virus. A total of 176 people have been hospitalized, while about 31% of cases occurred in people under 18.

In response to the outbreak, Pennsylvania administered more than 53,000 MMR doses in September, more than double the number typically given in a month.

Also read: Rabies Day Exclusive: ‘We Need To Target The Source’ For A Rabies-Free India By 2030, Says Veterinary Epidemiologist

Officials Are Disagreeing Over The Death Toll

There is also a dispute over how measles-related deaths should be counted. Pennsylvania has reported five “measles-associated” deaths, using a state definition that includes people with confirmed measles who die within 30 days of developing symptoms, unless another unrelated event caused the death.

The CDC, on the other hand, has confirmed two measles-related deaths nationally after changing its approach to rely on mortality data from the National Center for Health Statistics rather than state health department reports.

The disagreement has triggered a public dispute between Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro and US Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr. The CDC has said it is working with state epidemiologists to establish a more consistent definition for measles-related deaths.

Measles is preventable, but protection depends on maintaining high vaccination coverage across communities. When vaccination rates fall, the virus can spread rapidly, particularly among people who are too young to be vaccinated, have medical reasons or have not completed their recommended doses.

From H. pylori and parasitic infections to metabolic and lifestyle-related conditions, the global burden of gastrointestinal (GI) diseases is changing, said experts at the World Congress of Gastroenterology (WCOG) 2026 in New Delhi today.

Being held in India for the first time, the four-day Congress brings together around 3,000 delegates from 61 countries to discuss the changing burden of gastrointestinal and liver diseases, early diagnosis, prevention and treatment.

Speaking at a media roundtable, Dr Govind Makharia, Professor, Department of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition Unit, AIIMS New Delhi, stated that "the GI disease burden is changing in both its scale and clinical profile. Alongside infections such as H. pylori and parasitic diseases, metabolic and lifestyle-related conditions are becoming increasingly important".

He stressed the need for making timely diagnosis critical, whether for liver disease, colorectal cancer, celiac disease or IBD.

H. pylori And Cancer Risk

Notably, infections like H. pylori have become a major driver of cancer. A recent Lancet study found that five infections, including H. pylori and HPV, contribute to about 1 in 8 cancers worldwide.

Speaking to HealthandMe, Dr Garg said H. pylori is a very important bacterial infection that resides in the stomach.

“It is very common in India; about 40-60% of people might be affected by this. It has been shown that H. pylori infection can cause swelling in the stomach, can cause ulcers in the stomach, and in some cases may also cause gastric or stomach cancer. It has been classified as a carcinogen,” he said.

However, he stressed that H. pylori infection does not mean a person will develop cancer.

“So, it is not that anybody who is infected with this will develop cancer. This is very, very important for people to understand otherwise, there will be a lot of scare,” he cautioned.

On whether everyone with H. pylori should be treated, Garg said the answer depends on the context.

“In some countries, they are testing and treating; in others we are not advocating routine testing and treating because the other factors which lead to cancer are not fully known in that case.”

Also read: Fatty Liver, Chronic Gut Diseases And Worm Infections: India’s Changing Disease Burden

MASLD And Liver Disease

The experts also discussed colorectal cancers, MASLD and liver disease and stressed the need to strengthen screening, risk stratification, newer pharmacological approaches and identifying patients at risk of hepatocellular carcinoma.

“Gastrointestinal diseases may present differently across populations, but many of the challenges are shared. Earlier diagnosis, access to evidence-based treatment and stronger prevention strategies remain important priorities,” said Professor Carolina Olano, Professor and Director, Department of Gastroenterology, Universidad de la República, Uruguay, and President, World Gastroenterology Organisation.

Alongside these clinical priorities, WCOG 2026 is also highlighting simple measures for better digestive and liver health, including safe food and clean water, a balanced diet, regular exercise and avoiding alcohol.

How Can You Boost Your Digestive and Liver Health

Beyond diagnosis and treatment, the experts also highlighted simple measures that can support digestive and liver health.

1. Wash it. Cook it. Keep it safe.

2. Eat a balanced diet.

3. Eat smart, not large.

4. Eat slowly.

5. Make yoghurt your daily gut friend.

6. Drink water and eat whole fruits, not just fruit juice.

7. Think twice before eating processed, fatty or sugary foods.

8. Your liver is better without alcohol.

9. Exercise daily for better health and long-term wellness.

10. Sharing is caring — but not all the time.

The four-day Congress is jointly organized by the Indian Society of Gastroenterology and the World Gastroenterology Organization under the theme “Transforming Gastrointestinal Health, Preserving Nature.”

A recent Delhi High Court ruling has highlighted reproductive autonomy of women with disabilities. The court dismissed a plea seeking to let a woman with cerebral palsy undergo hysterectomy (uterus removal) solely because she was unable to manage her menstrual cycles independently.

The court stated that “disability can never be the only ground to deny reproductive autonomy”. At the same time, it also said that such surgeries can only be considered if medical experts determine that it is in the person's best interests and would protect their welfare and dignity.

Also Read: We Are Exposed To 93% Of Plastic Chemicals Through Food Packaging, Toys & Clothes: What Are The Health Risks

Delhi HC On Disability And Reproductive Autonomy

The Delhi High Court was hearing a plea from the parents of a differently-abled woman suffering from cerebral palsy with spastic moderate hemiparesis with moderate mental retardation. They had approached the court seeking to let the woman undergo a surgery for removal of the uterus.

According to the petition, the woman was born in March 2005 and had cerebral palsy with spastic moderate hemiparesis and moderate mental retardation.

Her parents argued that her disability was permanent and that she was unable to give consent for the procedure. They also cited difficulties in managing her during menstruation. The court, however, dismissed the plea for the surgery.

Justice Amit Mahajan, instead, directed authorities to constitute an independent multidisciplinary medical board to evaluate whether hysterectomy was medically appropriate. The board was asked to make a decision within four weeks.

The court's stance was that disability by itself cannot justify removing a person's reproductive organs.

The judge said, “It is apposite to mention that disability in itself can never be the only ground to deny reproductive autonomy or approve removal of reproductive organ and thus, such a route of surgical intervention can be adopted if medical evaluations suggest that the same would be in the best interest of the petitioner for protection of her welfare and dignity.”

The court also clarified that allowing the medical board to examine the situation was not the same as approving the hysterectomy.

“The same may not be construed as carte blanche or approval of the surgery, since the opinion on the surgery has to be formed by domain experts, that is, medical experts,” the judge said.

Also read: Trying to Conceive After an Abortion? Key Physical and Emotional Factors to Consider

What Is A Hysterectomy?

Hysterectomy is a surgical procedure to remove the uterus. Depending on medical reasons, other reproductive organs like the cervix, fallopian tubes or ovaries may also be removed.

After the uterus removal, a woman can no longer become pregnant and will no longer have menstrual periods. It is therefore a major, irreversible procedure that warrants careful consideration.

When Is Hysterectomy Medically Necessary?

Difficulty in managing menstruation due to a disability is not automatically the same thing as a medical indication for hysterectomy. Hysterectomy may be recommended for certain serious medical conditions when other treatments are ineffective or inappropriate.

Dr. Renu Raina Sehgal, Chairperson - Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Artemis Hospital, Gurugram, told HealthandMe, “Hysterectomy is not indicated for disability alone. It may be considered if a woman has heavy bleeding, pain, fibroids, cancer and another problem with her uterus.”

Doctors also believe that women with disabilities may have difficilty in managing heavy periods and other symptoms difficult.

Dr. Anagha Chhatrapati, Senior Consultant Gynaecologist, Gleneagles Hospital, told HealthandMe, “For a woman with severe physical or cognitive disability, managing recurrent heavy periods may be particularly difficult, but less invasive options should generally be considered first. The decision should be individualised, medically justified, and made with the woman’s informed consent, wherever she has decision-making capacity.”

Also read: Rare Pregnancy Infections Linked To 3-Fold Higher Autism Risk: What Is TORCH?

Experts On The Court's Ruling

Delhi High Court’s ruling focuses on medical necessity and reproductive autonomy for disabled women. People with disabilities may require additional support to manage menstruation and reproductive needs. But the need for assistance does not, by itself, mean that an irreversible reproductive surgery is appropriate.

Dr. Raina Sehgal said, “Removal of the uterus cannot be done solely on the wishes of the patient or caregivers. There must be a valid medical indication and in cases involving mental illness and severe debilitating conditions, approval of an appropriate medical board may also be required. Disability may affect care needs but should never automatically determine hysterectomy.”

Alternatives For Disabled Women Besides Hysterectomy

The doctors also explain that women with disability have several alternatives to an irreversible surgery.

Dr. Raina Sehgal said, “Alternatives may include menstrual management with hormonal medications, a hormonal intrauterine device, pain management, management of underlying conditions and endometrial ablation in selected women. Practical support, accessible menstrual products as well as caregiver support could help.”

Dr. Chhatrapati said that the choice should be individualised based on the woman’s medical needs, preferences, and overall wellbeing.

Risks Of Hysterectomy

It is important to consider alternatives to hysterectomy as it is not only irreversible but also has some risks.

Dr. Chhatrapati said, “Hysterectomy can lead to bleeding, infection, blood clots and injury to nearby organs such as the bladder or bowel. Recovery can take several weeks, depending on the type of surgery and the woman’s overall health. It also permanently ends the ability to carry a pregnancy and, if the ovaries are removed, can cause surgical menopause.”