The Union Health Ministry implemented a ban on 156 "irrational" FDC medicines, effective immediately. These medicines, including widely used antibiotics, painkillers, and multivitamins, were commonly used to treat fever, cough, and infections. The ban was imposed due to the associated health risks and lack of therapeutic justification for the ingredients in these FDCs.

What are FDC medicines?

FDCs or fixed-dosed combinations, also known as "cocktail drugs," are medications that combine multiple drugs in a single pill. They are designed to treat multiple symptoms or conditions simultaneously. While they offer convenience, they can pose significant risks. These risks include the possibility of overdose, adverse interactions between the drugs, and the development of antibiotic resistance. Additionally, many FDC medicines lack sufficient scientific evidence to support their safety and efficacy.

Expert opinions on FDC medicines

Experts have raised concerns about the use of FDC medicines. They believe that many of these combinations lack sufficient scientific evidence to support their safety and effectiveness. Additionally, the combination of multiple drugs in a single pill can increase the risk of adverse side effects and interactions with other medications.

Experts have also found that FDC medicines may not be as effective as individual drugs in treating certain conditions. It is important to note that safer and more effective alternatives are available for most of the medical conditions that FDC medicines were used to treat. One particular concern is the inclusion of antibiotics in some FDCs. Overuse of antibiotics can contribute to the development of antibiotic resistance, a major public health threat.

The risks of FDC medicines

The use of FDC medicines can lead to adverse effects, including serious ones. Additionally, safer alternatives, tested in clinical trials, are available to treat the same medical conditions. Experts recommend prescribing drugs individually based on a patient's clinical symptoms rather than combining them in FDCs.

The ban on irrational FDC medicines by the Union Health Ministry can be seen as a positive step towards promoting rational drug use and protecting public health. The goal is to eliminate unnecessary and potentially harmful drug combinations. This is a step forward in reducing the risks associated with medication and ensure safer and more effective treatment options for patients.

Eat healthy meals and follow a proper diet plan; your diet must be balanced—many have grown up listening to these healthy recommendations. However, little do we realise just how much difference healthy habits make to our lives. Even when it comes to constipation, one barely understands the long-term repercussions of irregular trips to the loo and how this may impact overall health. According to a 2023 review, prominent differences can be noticed in the gut microbiomes of 'slowpokes' and 'speeders.' Because the gut is strongly linked to overall health, there are several health implications that often go unnoticed.

What happens when you are constipated for a long time?

Constipation refers to a state wherein one fails to pass stools at least three times a week. Slow transit, too, is associated with inflammatory and metabolic disorders—and even Parkinson’s disease. Experts say that identifying microbiome profiles linked to gut transit time could help develop a fresh approach to treating and managing these conditions. Experts involved in the study explained how bidirectional interactions between transit time and gut microbiota provide a useful way to understand gut microbiome variations in both disease and health.

Why is the gut microbiome important?

Experts say that the gut microbiome, in both activity and composition, plays a crucial role in health. From diet to exercise, it can be shaped by various factors. For this, experts evaluated the impact of holding in stool and its consequent effects on health. They analysed previously published research on gut transit time, diet, gut microbiome composition, stool consistency, and metabolites released. Experts found that the studies involved thousands of participants—both healthy individuals and those dealing with comorbidities such as liver cirrhosis, irritable bowel syndrome and constipation. However, this required swallowable capsules with sensors to track their journey through the digestive tract.

Another method used was the Bristol Stool Scale—a diagnostic tool that classifies stool based on whether it resembles hard pellets or watery mush. Some studies also tracked how long participants took to pass sweetcorn or blue dye. The goal was the same — estimating how long food remains in the colon. The longer it stays, the more time bacteria have to regulate gut acidity, ferment components, and produce metabolites that influence overall health.

The nutrition link

The research team yielded interesting results — people with faster gut transit had different microbiomes compared to those with slower transit times. This helped provide better predictions for gut microbiota than a simple test alone. It was also found that faster gut transit times were associated with microbiomes dominated by faster-growing species that thrived on a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet. Slower transit times, however, were linked to microbiomes influenced by diets high in protein. These extremes can reduce gut microbiome diversity compared to average transit times. Therefore, both fast and slow movement create environments where specific species dominate.

Collectively, the research showed that gut transit time is an overlooked tool for understanding how the gut functions, its role in overall health, and how people respond to treatments such as probiotics. This could also explain why the same gut health advice does not work for everyone. Two people can consume the same meal and still show different results, suggesting that an individual's gut rhythm can help tailor dietary advice and treatment to suit their body.

The research is published in the journal Gut.

Heart diseases cause the highest number of deaths globally every year, and over the past few years, cardiovascular complications have been noted among youngsters as well. Research has long shown that body fat accumulation can lead to harmful changes to heart structure. This can be potentially deadly later, and the risks were earlier thought to increase in middle age. However, as per Finnish and UK scientists, the most critical age for a spike in the risk of cardiac conditions is 17. Yes, this is when high levels of body fat become potentially harmful to heart health.

Why is 17 a critical age for heart health?

According to experts at the University of Eastern Finland, 17 is a critical age for young people, as adolescents often move towards a more independent life after that. From moving away from home to changes in diet and lifestyle habits, there is a likelihood that many may adopt unhealthy habits like drinking and smoking. This social shift can, over time, result in fat accumulation, thus posing heart disease risks in the future.

On the other hand, experts say that adolescence is the best time to adopt a healthy lifestyle and lower body fat in cases of childhood obesity. It is the best time to reduce the risk of heart disease, thereby increasing the chances of a healthy adulthood.

For this, scientists tracked 1,803 children aged 9–24 years. They used dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans to evaluate fat levels in the abdomen and body and to calculate muscle mass. The children had the scans completed at the age of nine, and then were tested again at ages 11, 15, 17, and 24 years. Echocardiography scans were also done at 17 and 24 years to examine heart function and structure, as well as insulin, blood sugar, and cholesterol levels.

Researchers found that from the age of 17, excessive fat (abdominal fat specifically) was linked to structural changes in the heart. This can lead to excessive pressure to pump blood normally, thereby contributing to a heightened risk of heart disease later. The results were published in the European Journal of Endocrinology.

The role of fat in changing heart structure

Researchers found that the heart’s structure can be altered by fat, and this happens primarily through inflammation and high blood pressure. Experts concluded that BMI is a poor marker for calculating fat mass in adolescents and children because they have four times more lean mass than fat mass, and BMI does not distinguish between the two. The study helps us understand that accumulated total abdominal and body fat in late adolescence can adversely affect a growing heart. Therefore, any lifestyle changes that can help lower body fat in adolescence, as early as 17 years, can be beneficial.

Fatty liver, or non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), refers to the accumulation of excess fat in liver cells in people who consume little or no alcohol. In its early stages, it may seem harmless. However, it is, in fact, the liver’s first warning that the body’s metabolic balance is burdened. What is concerning is who we are now diagnosing. Young adults in their 20s and early 30s, often with no visible signs of illness, are clear evidence of this condition. This is no longer an additional finding but has become routine. Dr Kandarp Saxena, Gastroenterologist, Manipal Hospital, Jaipur, recently spoke about how fatty liver, which is now becoming more common among younger people, may soon become a lifestyle crisis.

A Lifestyle That Directly Impacts the Liver

Irregular eating habits, such as late-night meals or long gaps followed by overeating, can further throw off the body’s natural metabolic balance. Poor sleep adds another layer, affecting insulin sensitivity and fat metabolism. These are not abstract risks but measurable contributors to how and why fatty liver is developing.

Why Most Young Patients Do Not Realise It

Unlike many other conditions, fatty liver does not produce symptoms that prompt early medical attention. In the early stages, the liver continues to function normally, so daily life goes on as usual. There are no obvious signs to suggest that anything is changing beneath the surface.

Most diagnoses in this age group are incidental, detected during routine blood tests showing mildly elevated liver enzymes or through ultrasound imaging done for unrelated reasons. The absence of these symptoms is not a favourable feature. It delays recognition at a stage when the condition is most easily reversible.

The Indian Risk Profile Is Different

The early onset of fatty liver in India cannot be viewed in the same way as in Western populations. South Asians are known to develop metabolic complications at lower body mass indices. This means that even people who appear healthy or not overweight may still carry harmful fat deep inside the body, along with underlying insulin resistance.

When this is combined with rapid urbanisation, less movement in daily life, and a growing dependence on calorie-dense foods, it slowly adds up to a higher overall risk. As a result, fatty liver is appearing earlier and progressing faster in this population.

From Fat Accumulation to Liver Damage

It is important to understand that fatty liver is not a static condition. In some individuals, simple fat accumulation remains stable. In others, it moves beyond fat build-up and starts irritating the liver, leading to a stage called non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). This is important because the liver is no longer just holding fat; it is getting damaged.

As the damage continues, the liver tries to heal, but this repair leaves behind scar tissue, known as fibrosis. Over time, this scarring can build up and start to affect how well the liver works. If it continues, it can lead to cirrhosis, where the liver becomes heavily scarred and begins to struggle, increasing the risk of liver failure and cancer. This progression does not happen abruptly; it occurs over years, often without clear clinical warning, making early identification critical.

Why Early Intervention Is Being Missed

Despite being detectable and reversible in its early stages, fatty liver is often not addressed with the urgency it requires. Mild elevations in liver enzymes are sometimes overlooked. Imaging findings are not always followed up with structured intervention. More importantly, younger patients are less likely to be counselled about long-term risk. There is also a tendency to delay action because the condition does not immediately affect quality of life. This delay allows progression that could otherwise have been prevented.

Treatment Exists—but Depends on Behaviour

There is no single drug that reverses fatty liver in the way lifestyle modification does. Clinical evidence consistently shows that sustained weight reduction, regular physical activity, and dietary changes can significantly reduce liver fat and, in some cases, reverse early damage. However, these interventions require consistency. Short-term efforts do not produce lasting benefit. Without sustained change, the underlying process continues.

A Shift That Needs Recognition

The increasing prevalence of fatty liver in young Indians is not an isolated clinical observation; it reflects a shift in how disease is presented. When a condition that was once seen later in life starts appearing a decade or two earlier, it changes the health trajectory of an entire population. It raises the chances of long-term complications and means people end up living with the disease for much longer. Fatty liver is now emerging as one of the earliest indicators of this shift.

Fatty liver does not begin with symptoms. It begins with accumulation of excess calories, reduced activity, and sustained metabolic imbalance. By the time it is detected, the process is already in motion. The challenge, therefore, is not just in treating the condition but in recognising it early enough to change its course.